Abstract
Site-directed spin labeling (SDSL) and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy offer accurate, sensitive tools for the characterization of structure and function of macromolecules and their assemblies. A new rigid spin label, spirocyclohexyl nitroxide α-amino acid and its N-(9-fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl) (Fmoc) derivative, has been synthesized that exhibit slow enough spin echo dephasing to permit accurate distance measurements by pulse EPR at temperatures up to 125 K in 1:1 water:glycerol and at higher temperatures in matrices with higher glass transition temperatures. Distance measurements in the liquid nitrogen temperature range are less expensive than those that require liquid helium, which will greatly facilitate applications of pulsed EPR to the study of structure and conformation for peptides and proteins.
Keywords: spin labels, EPR, radicals, spiro compounds, spin relaxation
Introduction
Accurate and sensitive methods to probe structure and function of proteins, nucleic acids, and their assemblies are important for understanding disease processes and interventions, and contribute to drug design. Conformations and interactions of these macromolecules can be probed using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR), fluorescence spectroscopy, and small angle scattering (SAS).
An exciting and important development is site-directed spin labeling (SDSL) of biomacromolecules, mostly proteins, but recently also RNA and DNA, and the use of pulsed EPR spectroscopy to measure distances between labels separated by 2–8 nm.[1–11] The spin-labeling/pulsed EPR technique is one of the best methods for accurate measurement of conformational changes and characterization of flexible regions of biomacromolecules, with minimum perturbation by relatively small labels. Applications are however impeded by the electron spin-spin relaxation properties of spin labels. In contrast to advances in SDSL and pulsed EPR techniques, improvements in spin labels have lagged behind.
Double electron resonance (DEER) and double quantum coherence (DQC) methods for interspin distance determination are based upon detection of an electron spin echo. The time constant for decay of the echo as a function of the time between pulses is the phase memory time Tm. The longer Tm, the longer the distance one can measure, and the more precisely the distribution of distances can be defined.[10, 12] Most spin labels, including the widely used 1-oxyl-2,2,5,5-tetramethyl-3-pyrroline-3-(methyl)methanethiosulfonate (MTSSL) (Figure 1), are nitroxide radicals in which the N-O radical moiety is sterically shielded by two gem-dimethyl-substituted quaternary carbons to provide kinetic stability. At temperatures above about 70 K rotation of these methyl groups averages inequivalent couplings of the unpaired electron to the protons on the EPR timescale, which decreases Tm,[13–15] and imposes a 50–65 K upper limit on the temperature at which distance measurements can be made with optimum performance.[12] To achieve these temperatures liquid helium is required. The gemdimethyl structure motif in spin labels has remained unchanged since McConnell's pioneering studies.[16] Recently, Velavan et al. showed that nitroxides such as 7-aza-4,12,15-trihydroxydispiro[5.1.5.3]hexadecane-7-oxyl (trihydroxy-DICPO) (Figure 1), which are stabilized by spirocyclohexyl groups at the 2-and 6-positions of the piperidine ring exhibit values of Tm in 1:1 water:glycerol that are long enough for pulsed EPR distance measurements up to about 125 K.[17] New spin labels with cyclohexyl groups instead of gem-dimethyls would make it possible to perform distance measurements with less expensive liquid nitrogen.
Figure 1.

Nitroxide spin labels and related radicals.
In spin labels such as MTSSL, the linkage between the protein and the nitroxide N-O group is relatively flexible and the distance between the protein backbone and the N-O moiety is about 0.7 nm. Another spin label is 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxyl-4-amino-4-carboxylic acid (TOAC) (Figure 1) – first synthesized by Rassat and Rey.[18] This unnatural α-amino acid greatly improves EPR distance measurements because it can be rigidly built into a polypeptide chain, though it poses more strict restraints on backbone geometry than natural amino acids. Although incorporation of TOAC into peptides and proteins is more difficult compared to MTSSL, TOAC has been used to study protein folding, backbone dynamics, and peptide aggregation.[8, 19–29]
Here we report the synthesis and characterization of spirocyclohexyl nitroxide α-amino acid 1 (7-aza-dispiro[5.1.5.3]hexadecane-7-oxyl-15-amino-15-carboxylic acid and its N-(9-fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl) (Fmoc) derivative, Fmoc-1, for incorporation into a peptide via solid-phase synthesis, analogous to that for TOAC (Figure 1).[33] The bulky spirocyclohexyl groups may make incorporation of 1 into a peptide more challenging than of TOAC. These bulky groups may also pose greater constraints on conformations of the peptide backbone, as well as on packing of the side groups, however, the significance of these constraints is likely to depend on the peptide. To distinguish between the impact of intramolecular motions and molecular librations,[13, 30, 31] the temperature dependence of Tm for 1 in 1:1 water:glycerol is compared with that in a poly(vinyl alcohol)–borate glass (PVA/borate)[32] that has a glass transition temperature well above ambient. This new spin label has long enough Tm at 125 K to perform DEER with liquid nitrogen in 1:1 water:glycerol, and at higher temperatures in PVA/borate.
Results and Discussion
Synthesis
The synthesis of nitroxide α-amino acid 1 and its Fmoc-protection is outlined in Scheme 1. Nitroxide 2 was prepared by the modified method of Bobbit and coworkers,[34] and then converted to hydantoin nitroxide 3 in high yield. Using the method for preparation of TOAC,[18] direct hydrolysis of hydantoin nitroxide 3 under forcing conditions, provided α-amino acid nitroxide 1 in about 50% yield. However, it was difficult to isolate 1 with 100% spin purity and free from the intermediate hydrolysis product (hydantoic acid).[35] The increased steric shielding of the 15-position by the spirocyclohexane rings of 1, compared to the methyl groups of TOAC, may contribute to the incomplete conversion of the intermediate hydantoic acid to 1. The synthesis was modified by following Rebek's method for conversion of hydantoin-nucleosides to the corresponding amino acid-nucleosides,[36] in two steps. Therefore, hydantoin nitroxide 3 was converted to the di-Boc derivative 4, followed by hydrolysis under relatively mild conditions to provide 1 in the zwitterionic form, as precipitate from water.
Scheme 1.

Synthesis of spirocyclic nitroxide α-amino acid 1 and its N-protected derivative Fmoc-1. (i) (NH4)2CO3, NaCN, H2O, 75 °C, 35 h; (ii) Ba(OH)2, H2O, then (NH4)2CO3, H2O, 140–170 °C; (iii) Boc2O, DMAP, THF, 25 °C, 3 h; (iv) LiOH, 40–45 °C, 12 h; (v) HCl, 0 °C, pH 6.5; (vi) Fmoc-succinimidyl carbonate (Fmoc-OSu), triethylamine, acetonitrile/water, pH 8–9, 25 °C, 45 min, then 20% aqueous citric acid, 0 °C, 15 min
The use of an amino acid as spin label is best implemented using Fmoc as an N-protecting group, to enable incorporation of the spin label in the peptide chain via solid-phase synthesis.[37, 38] Therefore, 1 was N-protected to provide Fmoc-1 in ~50% yield and ~100% spin purity (Scheme 1).
Spectroscopic data for 1 and Fmoc-1 are similar to those reported for their TOAC analogues (Supporting Information).[37, 38] In particular, 1H NMR spectrum for a 0.18 M lithium salt of 1 in D2O shows a broad resonance with a shoulder at about −1 ppm, compared to the single resonance at −5.7 ppm reported for a saturated solution of TOAC in D2O at pH 12.[39] Also, 1H NMR spectra for 1 and Fmoc-1 indicate that these nitroxide radicals possess high spin purity (Figures S17 and S18, Supporting Information).
X-ray crystallography
Although a single crystals of 1 could not be grown, the structure and conformation of hydantoin nitroxide 3 was determined by X-ray crystallography using synchrotron radiation (Figure 2).[40] Two different crystal structures were observed, designated as structure A and B, and one of them is the solvent polymorph of the other. Both structures have space group P-1 with two unique molecules (molecule A and B) per asymmetric unit; the asymmetric unit of structure B includes half of a solvent molecule (ethyl acetate). The two structures differ in the connectivity of hydrogen bonds between hydantoin moieties (Figures S4 and S5, Supporting Information).
Figure 2.

Molecular structure and conformation for hydantoin nitroxide 3. (a) Structure A. (b) Structure B. ORTEP plots with thermal ellipsoids set at 50% probability show one of the two unique molecules, without solvent of crystallization.
In both structures A and B, the piperidine ring of molecule A adopts a twist-boat conformation and that of molecule B adopts a chair conformation with an approximately Cs symmetry (Figure 2). In both unique molecules with chair conformations, the carbonyl group of the hydantoin is in the “equatorial” position. The spirocyclic cyclohexane rings of all unique molecules are in chair conformations, in which the nitroxide moiety is in an equatorial position. In peptides, the TOAC piperidine ring adopts a twist-boat conformation.[41, 42]
The co-existence of unique molecules with twist-boat and chair piperidine rings in single crystals of 3 suggests that the energy difference between the two conformations is small. This energy difference was calculated using the B3LYP density functional method with the triple-ζ basis set 6–311+G(d,p).[43] Optimization of the structures starting from the X-ray determined geometries for molecule A and molecule B in structure A gives a preference for chair over twist-boat by 0.9 kcal mol−1 (corrected for zero-point energies).[44]
Spin Echo Dephasing
The dephasing rates, 1/Tm (Figure 3), for 1 in 1:1 water:glycerol are similar to those for trihydroxy-DICPO,[17] but they are very different from methyl-containing MTSSL which is commonly used for DEER experiments, for which rotation of the gem-dimethyls dominates dephasing between about 80 and 250 K.[45] The relatively slow dephasing rates for 1 up to about 125 K will make it possible to perform DEER experiments in this liquid-nitrogen accessible temperature range. In 1:1 water:glycerol which has a glass transition temperature about 175 K,[46, 47] the dephasing rates for both MTSSL and 1 increase rapidly above about 125 K (Figure 3), which is attributed to increasing molecular motion as the glass softens.
Figure 3.

Temperature dependence of spin echo dephasing rates, 1/Tm, in 1:1 water:glycerol for 1 (
), and MTSSL (
).
The dramatic impact of the changes in 1/Tm from MTSSL to 1 on the spin echo intensity at the interpulse spacings (τ) of 1 to 2 μs that are commonly used for DEER and DQC experiments is evident from the plots shown in Figure 4. The echo intensity at the τ values used for the DEER or DQC experiments determines the signal-to-noise. Longer Tm provides adequate signal-to-noise at longer τ values, which permits measurement of longer interspin distances and more accurate definition of distributions of interspin distances.
Figure 4.

Intensity of spin echo in 1:1 water:glycerol at 105 K as a function of the time between pulses (τ) for 1 (solid red line), and MTSSL (dashed green line).
To determine whether piperidine ring dynamics impact spin echo dephasing at higher temperatures, echo decays were studied in PVA/borate, which has a glass transition temperature well above ambient. In this glass, 1/Tm for spirocyclic nitroxides 1 and trihydroxy-DICPO, which have 6-membered piperidine rings, exhibits negligible temperature dependence up to 125 K, then increases gradually with increasing temperature up to 350 K (Figure 5). In contrast, methyl rotation dominates echo dephasing between about 80 and 250 K for both MTSSL which has a 5-membered pyrroline ring and for 1-oxyl-2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-hydroxypiperidine (Tempol), which has a 6-membered piperidine ring. For MTSSL and Tempol the temperature dependence of 1/Tm above 300 K is similar to that for 1 and for trihydroxy-DICPO. At 350 K Tm for trihydroxy-DICPO and for 1 are 200 ns and 70 ns longer, respectively, than Tm for MTSSL or Tempol.
Figure 5.

Temperature dependence of spin echo dephasing rates, 1/Tm, in 1:1 PVA/borate for 1 (
), trihydroxy-DICPO (
), Tempol (Δ), and MTSSL (
)
Conclusion
The synthesis of 1 demonstrates that it is possible to prepare a spin label with a short rigid linker analogous to that of TOAC and the favorable electron spin relaxation properties of spirocyclohexyl nitroxides. The shorter distance between the α-carbon and the paramagnetic center for 1 than for MTSSL will decrease the range of conformations present in spin-labeled samples. The negligible temperature dependence of 1/Tm for 1 in 1:1 water:glycerol facilitates EPR distance measurements up to 125 K with liquid nitrogen. The spin lattice relaxation rates (1/T1) for 1 at 125 K are about 4 times faster than for MTSSL at 65 K (Figure S2, Supporting Information). The differences in Boltzmann populations, which determine echo intensity, decrease approximately linearly with increasing temperature. The loss in signal intensity due to the decrease in the difference in populations of the spin states on increasing temperature from 65 K to about 125 K is approximately compensated by the faster pulse repetition rates that can be used at 125 K. Thus, incorporation of 1 into peptides and proteins should permit EPR distance measurements using liquid nitrogen at temperatures up to about 125 K with sensitivity similar to that which has previously been possible only by using liquid helium.
Spin echo dephasing experiments as a function of temperature in rigid PVA/borate demonstrate that the faster dephasing rate for MTSSL and 1 above about 150 K in 1:1 water:glycerol is due to the onset of motion as the glass softens. MTSSL and Tempol have different ring structures, but have similar 1/Tm rates in PVA/borate above room temperature, and 1/Tm of 1 is similar to that for MTSSL at 350 K, which suggests that piperidine ring dynamics do not dominate dephasing at temperatures up to 350 K. These results demonstrate that the use of rigid matrices with high glass transition temperatures should permit pulsed EPR distance measurements with 1 as a spin label at temperature well above 125 K. Slower dephasing for trihydroxy-DICPO than for 1 above about 200 K could be attributed to hydrogen-bonding between the three hydroxyl groups and the PVA/borate matrix, which would decrease librational motion.[13, 31] The dependence of Tm on motion above about 200 K suggests that when 1 is incorporated into a peptide, Tm may increase.
Experimental Section
Experimental details on the synthesis and characterization of amino acid nitroxide and its Fmoc-derivative, Fmoc-1, as well as description of pulsed EPR experiments, may be found in the Supporting Information.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by NSF CHE-0718117 (Nebraska), NIH NIBIB EB008484 (Nebraska), Nebraska Research Initiative, and NIH NIBIB EB002807 (Denver). Use of the APS for crystallography is supported by the U. S. DOE, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357 and ChemMatCARS by the National Science Foundation/DOE grant, CHE-0535644. We thank Professor David Thomas (Minnesota) for discussions and Dr. Shuzhang Xiao (Nebraska) for attempts to optimize direct hydrolysis of hydantoin to amino acid.
Footnotes
Supporting information for this article is available on the WWW under http://www.chemeurj.org/ or from the author.
References
- [1].Dzuba SA. Russian Chem. Rev. 2007;76:699–713. [Google Scholar]
- [2].Berliner LJ, Eaton GR, Eaton SS, editors. Distance Measurements in Biological Systems by EPR. Kluwer; New York: 2000. [Google Scholar]
- [3].Eaton GR, Eaton SS. Specialist Periodical Report on Electron Spin Resonance. 2008;21:59–75. [Google Scholar]
- [4].Jeschke G. ChemPhysChem. 2002;3:927–932. doi: 10.1002/1439-7641(20021115)3:11<927::AID-CPHC927>3.0.CO;2-Q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Jeschke G. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mat. Sci. 2003;7:181–188. [Google Scholar]
- [6].Jeschke G, Chechik V, Ionita P, Godt A, Zimmermann H, Banham J, Timmel CR, Hilger D, Jung H. Appl. Magn. Reson. 2006;30:473–498. [Google Scholar]
- [7].Klug CS, Feix JB. Biol. Magn. Reson. 2005;24:269–308. [Google Scholar]
- [8].McNulty J, Silapie JL, Carnevali M, Farrar TC, Griffin RG, Formaggio F, Crisma M, Toniolo C, Millhauser G. Biopolymers. 2000;55:479–485. doi: 10.1002/1097-0282(2000)55:6<479::AID-BIP1023>3.0.CO;2-F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Schiemann O, Piton N, Plackmeyer J, Bode BE, Prisner TF, Engels JW. Nature Protocols. 2007;2:904–923. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Borbat PP, Davis JH, Butcher SE, Freed JH. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004;126:7746–7747. doi: 10.1021/ja049372o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Lovett JE, Hoffmann M, Cnossen A, Shutter ATJ, Hogben HJ, Warren JE, Pascu SI, Kay CWM, Timmel CR, Anderson HL. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009;131:13852–13859. doi: 10.1021/ja905796z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Jeschke G, Polyhach Y. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2007;9:1895–1910. doi: 10.1039/b614920k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Dzuba SA, Maryasov AG, Salikhov AK, Tsvetkov YD. J. Magn. Reson. 1984;58:95–117. [Google Scholar]
- [14].Nakagawa K, Candelaria MB, Chik WWC, Eaton SS, Eaton GR. J. Magn. Reson. 1992;98:81–91. [Google Scholar]
- [15].Lindgren M, Eaton GR, Eaton SS, Jonsson B-H, Hammarstrom P, Svensson M, Carlsson U. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1997;2:2549–2554. [Google Scholar]
- [16].Stone TJ, Buckman T, Nordio PL, McConnell HM. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA. 1965;54:1010–1017. doi: 10.1073/pnas.54.4.1010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Kathirvelu V, Smith C, Parks C, Mannan MA, Miura Y, Takeshita K, Eaton SS, Eaton GR. Chem. Commun. 2009:454–456. doi: 10.1039/b817758a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Rassat A, Rey P. Bull. Chim. Soc. Fr. 1967:815–817. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Hanson P, Martinez G, Millhauser G, Formaggio F, Crisma M, Toniolo C, Vita C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996;118:271–272. [Google Scholar]
- [20].Toniolo C, Crisma M, Formaggio F. Biopolymers. 1998;47:153–158. [Google Scholar]
- [21].Karim CB, Kirby TL, Zhang Z, Nesmelov Y, Thomas DD. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA. 2004;101:14437–14442. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0402801101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Zamoon J, Nitu F, Karim C, Thomas DD, Veglia G. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA. 2005;102:4747–4752. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0406039102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Karim CB, Zhang Z, Howard EC, Torgersen KD, Thomas DD. J. Mol. Biol. 2006;358:1032–1040. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.02.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Zhang Z, Thomas DD, Karim CB. Nature Protocols. 2006;2:43–49. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Zhang Z, Remmer HA, Thomas DD, Karim CB. Biopolymers. 2007;88:29–35. doi: 10.1002/bip.20618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].Nesmelov YE, Karim CB, Song L, Fajer P, Thomas DD. Biophys. J. 2007;93:2805–2812. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.107.108910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].Marsh D, Toniolo C. J. Magn. Reson. 2008;190:211–221. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2007.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [28].Bartucci R, Guzzi R, DeZotti M, Toniolo C, Sportelli L, Marsh D. Biophys. J. 2008;94:2698–2705. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.107.115287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].Milov AD, Samoilova RI, Tsvetkov YD, DeZotti M, Toniolo C, Raap J. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2008;112:13469–13472. doi: 10.1021/jp8046714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [30].Dzuba SA. Physics Lett. A. 1996;213:77–84. [Google Scholar]
- [31].Paschenko SV, Toropov YV, Dzuba SA, Tsvetkov YD, Vorobiev AK. J. Chem. Phys. 1999;110:8150–8154. [Google Scholar]
- [32].Nijenhuis KT. Polym. Bull. 2007;58:27–42. [Google Scholar]
- [33].Karim CB, Zhang Z, Thomas DD. Nature Protocols. 2007;2:42–49. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [34].Ma Z, Huang Q, Bobbitt JM. J. Org. Chem. 1993;58:4837–4843. [Google Scholar]
- [35].Ware E. Chem. Rev. 1950;46:403–470. doi: 10.1021/cr60145a001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [36].Kubik S, Meissner RS, Rebek J., Jr. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994;35:6635–6638. [Google Scholar]
- [37].Marchetto R, Schreier S, Nakaie CR. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993;115:11041–11043. [Google Scholar]
- [38].Smythe ML, Nakaie CR, Marshall GR. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995;117:10555–10562. [Google Scholar]
- [39].Rastrelli F, Bagno A. Chem. Eur. J. 2009;15:7990–8004. doi: 10.1002/chem.200802443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [40].Coordinates and other crystallographic information for polymorphs A and B of nitroxide 3 have been deposited with the Cambridge Crystallographic Database Center with deposition numbers CCDC 741375 and 741376, respectively.
- [41].Flippen-Anderson JL, George C, Valle G, Valente E, Bianco A, Formaggio F, Crisma M, Toniolo C. Int. J. Pept. Prot. Res. 1996;47:231–238. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3011.1996.tb01350.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [42].Crisma M, Deschamps JR, George C, Flippen-Anderson JL, Kaptein B, Broxterman QB, Moretto A, Oancea S, Jost M, Formaggio F, Toniolo C. J. Peptide Res. 2005;65:564–579. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3011.2005.00258.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [43].Frisch MJ, et al. Gaussian, Inc.; Wallingford, CT: 2004. [Google Scholar]
- [44].The preference for the chair conformation is only 0.4 kcal mol−1 at the X-ray determined geometries (Table S8, Supporting Information).
- [45].Zecevic A, Eaton GR, Eaton SS, Lindgren M. Mol. Phys. 1998;95:1255–1263. [Google Scholar]
- [46].Blochowicz T, Kudik A, Benkhof S, Senker J, Rossler E, Hinze G. J. Chem. Phys. 1999;110:12011–12022. [Google Scholar]
- [47].Murphy SSN. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2000;104:6955–6962. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
