Skip to main content
Elsevier Sponsored Documents logoLink to Elsevier Sponsored Documents
. 2011 Jun;188(3-4):359–361. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2010.05.005

Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in grazing cattle in central Ethiopia

Gobena Ameni a,c,, Martin Vordermeier b, Rebuma Firdessa c, Abraham Aseffa c, Glyn Hewinson b, Stephen V Gordon b,d,e, Stefan Berg b
PMCID: PMC3103825  PMID: 20965132

Abstract

A preliminary study to characterise mycobacteria infecting tuberculous cattle from two different management systems in central Ethiopia was carried out. Approximately 27% of isolates from grazing cattle were Mycobacterium tuberculosis, while cattle in a more intensive-production system were exclusively infected with M. bovis. The practice of local farmers discharging chewed tobacco directly into the mouths of pastured cattle was identified as a potential route of human-to-cattle transmission of M. tuberculosis.

Keywords: Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Tuberculosis, Cattle, Human, Transmission, Ethiopia


Mycobacteria of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex cause tuberculosis (TB) in various mammalian hosts but exhibit specific host tropisms (Smith et al., 2006). Bacterial species within the complex share 99.9% or greater similarity at the nucleotide level, and have a virtually identical 16S rDNA gene sequence (Sreevatsan et al., 1997; Brosch et al., 2002). The two major pathogenic species in this complex are M. tuberculosis and M. bovis, the causative agents of TB in humans and cattle, respectively. However, it is well known that M. bovis is zoonotic, while infection with M. tuberculosis has been sporadically reported in domestic and wild animal species, most frequently in animals living in prolonged, close contact with humans (Steele, 1980; Montali et al., 2001; Pavlik et al., 2003; Alfonso et al., 2004). Among domestic animals, infection with M. tuberculosis has been most frequently identified in cattle (Boulahbal et al., 1978; Sulieman, 2002; Prasad et al., 2005; Berg et al., 2009; Chen et al., 2009).

In Ethiopia, TB is prevalent in humans (0.6% prevalence; WHO, 2008) and livestock, as indicated by tuberculin test and slaughterhouse data (Ameni et al., 2007; Berg et al., 2009; Demelash et al., 2009). Previously, we found a disease prevalence of 10% in cattle from the Selalle region north of Addis Ababa and in animals in Holeta in the central highlands. These regions are major dairy farming areas that supply mainly unpasteurised milk to the urban and peri-urban areas of Addis Ababa (Ameni et al., 2007). In the present study, mycobacteria isolated from 52 cattle from these regions were characterised to the species level by molecular typing. Thirty of these animals were from the same intensive-production farm in Holeta and 22 were grazing cattle from 15 different farms in the Selalle region.

Heat-killed isolates were shipped frozen to the Veterinary Laboratories Agency (UK) for genotyping by multiplex PCR (Wilton and Cousins, 1992). Non-tuberculous mycobacteria were identified by GenoType Mycobacterium CM and AS kits (Hain Lifescience GmbH) or were sequenced at the 16S rDNA locus (Han et al., 2002) followed by sequence analysis (Berg et al., 2009). To discriminate isolates of the M. tuberculosis complex to the species level, ‘region of difference’ (RD) typing was carried out (Parsons et al., 2002) with forward, reverse, and internal primers for RD4 and RD10 (Brosch et al., 2002), and for RD9 (Berg et al., 2009). Spoligotyping of M. tuberculosis complex strains was also carried out (Kamerbeek et al., 1997).

The results of molecular typing of these isolates are summarised in Table 1. All 30 isolates from the intensive-production farm in Holeta were identified as M. bovis. The vast majority of cattle on this farm had tuberculous lesions in the lungs and thoracic lymph nodes. Of the 22 isolates from the grazing cattle in Selalle, one was identified as M. bovis and six as M. tuberculosis. These six isolates were isolated from six cattle obtained from six farms. Most of the M. tuberculosis isolates were recovered from lesions in the mesenteric and retropharyngeal lymph nodes. The M. bovis isolate had been cultured from a bronchial lymph node. Over 60% of the isolates from the grazing animals were non-tuberculous mycobacteria, as previously reported in Ethiopia (Berg et al., 2009).

Table 1.

Details of mycobacterial isolates, farms types and tissues infected in cattle from central Ethiopia.

Isolate Farm type Tissue infected Number of isolates
Mycobacterium bovis Intensive Lung, thoracic LN 30
Mycobacterium bovis Grazing Bronchial LN 1
Mycobacterium tuberculosis Grazing Bronchial,a mesenteric and retropharyngeal LN 6
Mycobacterium avium sub-species Grazing Medial retropharyngeal, mesenteric, hepatic and cranial mediastinal LN, lung 6
Mycobacterium gordonae Grazing Caudal mediastinal LN 1
Mycobacterium arupense Grazing Left bronchial LN 1
Mycobacterium vaccae Grazing Mesenteric and medial retropharyngeal LN 2
Mycobacterium holsaticum Grazing Caudal mediastinal LN 1
Other Mycobacteria Grazing Medial retropharyngeal, mesenteric and caudal mediastinal LN 4



Total 52

LN, lymph node.

a

One isolate.

Humans suffering from active TB are the most probable source of M. tuberculosis in animals, with infection spread via sputum, and rarely urine or faeces (Thoen and Steele, 1995). Reports of TB in cattle due to M. tuberculosis infection are usually from developing countries with a high prevalence of human TB. Infection rates of 6.2% and 7.4% have been reported in Algeria and Sudan, respectively (Boulahbal et al., 1978; Sulieman, 2002), and a recent slaughterhouse study from Ethiopia indicated that around 7% of isolates were M. tuberculosis (Berg et al., 2009). In the current study, approximately 27% of isolates from grazing cattle from Selalle were M. tuberculosis. This high incidence may not be representative of infection in the wider bovine population in Ethiopia, but does raise potentially serious zoonotic concerns.

In follow-up investigations we identified a unique habit among farmers in the Selalle region of chewing ground, baked tobacco and discharging the juice directly into the oral cavity of cattle (Fig. 1). This practice is considered a traditional anti-parasitic treatment that, is claimed, enhances animal performance. It is thus possible that such ‘mouth-to-mouth’ contact facilitates the transmission of M. tuberculosis from humans to cattle. Supportive evidence of this oral route of infection was the finding of tuberculous lesions in the retropharyngeal and mesenteric lymph nodes of such cattle post-mortem. In contrast, all M. bovis isolates from the intensive-production farm at Holeta were associated with respiratory tract lesions, supporting aerosol transmission between animals as the most likely route of infection (Ameni et al., 2006).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

A farmer in central Ethiopia discharging tobacco juice directly into the oral cavity of his cattle, a common practice in this region and a possible route of transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from humans to cattle.

However, it is possible that the M. tuberculosis-infected cattle became infected through other means. For example, in Ethiopia, grazing cattle are commonly brought into the farmers’ households at night where they may become infected via aerosol transmission from humans. However, it would be anticipated that this would result in a greater degree of respiratory tract disease in the animals. Although no isolates of M. tuberculosis were collected from humans on the farms under study, spoligotyping identified the six M. tuberculosis isolates from the cattle as SIT149, a type previously found in humans in central Ethiopia (Brudey et al., 2006; G. Ameni, personal communication). However, direct epidemiological links between farmers and cattle infected with M. tuberculosis remain to be elucidated.

In conclusion, this study highlights the possible risk of human-to-cattle transmission of M. tuberculosis through the practice of mouth-to-mouth feeding of tobacco juice and/or where animals live in close contact with tuberculous humans. Epidemiological studies are ongoing to determine the impact of tobacco juice feeding on cattle health and on the potential for transmitting M. tuberculosis to cattle.

Conflict of interest statement

None of the authors of this paper has a financial or personal relationship with other people or organisations that could inappropriately influence or bias the content of the paper.

Acknowledgement

The authors wish to thank The Wellcome Trust for funding this project under its ‘Animal Health in the Developing World’ initiative.

References

  1. Alfonso R., Romero R.E., Diaz A., Calderon M.N., Urdaneta G., Arce J., Patarroyo M.E., Patarroyo M.A. Isolation and identification of mycobacteria in New World primates maintained in captivity. Veterinary Microbiology. 2004;98:285–295. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2003.10.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ameni G., Aseffa A., Engers H., Young D., Hewinson G., Vordermeier M. Cattle husbandry in Ethiopia is a predominant factor affecting the pathology of bovine tuberculosis and gamma interferon responses to mycobacterial antigens. Clinical and Vaccine Immunology. 2006;13:1030–1036. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00134-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ameni G., Aseffa A., Engers H., Young D., Gordon S., Hewinson G., Vordermeier M. High prevalence and increased severity of pathology of bovine tuberculosis in Holsteins compared to zebu breeds under field cattle husbandry in central Ethiopia. Clinical and Vaccine Immunology. 2007;14:1356–1361. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00205-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Berg S., Firdessa R., Habtamu M., Gadisa E., Mengistu A., Yamuah L., Ameni G., Vordermeier M., Robertson B.D., Smith N.H., Engers H., Young D., Hewinson R.G., Aseffa A., Gordon S.V. The burden of mycobacterial disease in Ethiopian cattle: implications for public health. PLoS ONE. 2009;4:e5068. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Boulahbal F., Benelmouffok A., Brahimi K. Role of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in bovine tuberculosis. Architectural Institute of Pasteur in Algeria. 1978;53:155–164. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Brosch, R., Gordon, S.V., Marmiesse, M., Brodin, P., Buchrieser, C., Eiglmeier, K., Garnier, T., Gutierrez, C., Hewinson, G., Kremer, K., Parsons, L.M., Pym, A.S., Samper, S., van Soolingen, D., Cole, S.T., 2002. A new evolutionary scenario for the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. Proceeding of the National Academy of Science USA 99, pp. 3684–3689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  7. Brudey K., Driscoll J.R., Rigouts L., Prodinger W.M., Gori A., Al-Hajoj S.A., Allix C., Aristimuno L., Arora J., Baumanis V., Binder L., Cafrune P., Cataldi A., Cheong S., Diel R., Ellermeier C., Evans J.T., Fauville-Dufaux M., Ferdinand S., Garcia de Viedma D., Garzelli C., Gazzola L., Gomes H.M., Guttierez M.C., Hawkey P.M., van Helden P.D., Kadival G.V., Kreiswirth B.N., Kremer K., Kubin M., Kulkarni S.P., Liens B., Lillebaek T., Ho M.L., Martin C., Mokrousov I., Narvskaia O., Ngeow Y.F., Naumann L., Niemann S., Parwati I., Rahim Z., Rasolofo-Razanamparany V., Rasolonavalona T., Rossetti M.L., Rusch-Gerdes S., Sajduda A., Samper S., Shemyakin I.G., Singh U.B., Somoskovi A., Skuce R.A., van Soolingen D., Streicher E.M., Suffys P.N., Tortoli E., Tracevska T., Vincent V., Victor T.C., Warren R.M., Yap S.F., Zaman K., Portaels F., Rastogi N., Sola C. Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex genetic diversity: mining the fourth international spoligotyping database (SpolDB4) for classification, population genetics and epidemiology. BMC Microbiology. 2006;6:23. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-6-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen Y., Chao Y., Deng Q., Liu T., Xiang J., Chen J., Zhou J., Zhan Z., Kuang Y., Cai H., Chen H., Guo A. Potential challenges to the stop TB plan for humans in China; cattle maintain M. Bovis and M. tuberculosis. Tuberculosis (Edinburgh) 2009;89:95–100. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2008.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Demelash B., Inangolet F., Oloya J., Asseged B., Badaso M., Yilkal A., Skjerve E. Prevalence of bovine tuberculosis in Ethiopian slaughter cattle based on post-mortem examination. Tropical Animal Health and Production. 2009;41:755–765. doi: 10.1007/s11250-008-9248-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Han X.Y., Pham A.S., Tarrand J.J., Sood P.K., Luthra R. Rapid and accurate identification of mycobacteria by sequencing hypervariable regions of the 16S ribosomal RNA gene. American Journal of Clinical Pathology. 2002;118:796–801. doi: 10.1309/HN44-XQYM-JMAQ-2EDL. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kamerbeek J., Schouls L., Kolk A., van Agterveld M., van Soolingen D., Kuijper S., Bunschoten A., Molhuizen H., Shaw R., Goyal M., van Embden J. Simultaneous detection and strain differentiation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis for diagnosis and epidemiology. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 1997;35:907–914. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.4.907-914.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Montali R.J., Mikota S.K., Cheng L.I. Mycobacterium tuberculosis in zoo and wildlife species. Scientific and Technical Review. 2001;20:291–303. doi: 10.20506/rst.20.1.1268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Parsons L.M., Brosch R., Cole S.T., Somoskovi A., Loder A., Bretzel G., Van Soolingen D., Hale Y.M., Salfinger M. Rapid and simple approach for identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex isolates by PCR-based genomic deletion analysis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2002;40:2339–2345. doi: 10.1128/JCM.40.7.2339-2345.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Pavlik I.A., Parmova W.Y., Melicharek I., Hanzlikova M., Kormendy B., Nagy G., Cvetnic Z., Katalinic-Jankovic V., Ocepek M., Zolnir-Dovc M., Lipiec M. Mycobacterium tuberculosis in animal and human populations in six Central European countries during 1990–1999. Czech Veterinary Medicine. 2003;48:83–89. [Google Scholar]
  15. Prasad H.K., Singhal A., Mishra A., Shah N.P., Katoch V.M., Thakral S.S., Singh D.V., Chumber S., Bal S., Aggarwal S., Padma M.V., Kumar S., Singh M.K., Acharya S.K. Bovine tuberculosis in India: potential basis for zoonosis. Tuberculosis (Edinburgh) 2005;85:421–428. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2005.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Smith N.H., Kremer K., Inwald J., Dale J., Driscoll J.R., Gordon S.V., van Soolingen D., Hewinson R.G., Smith J.M. Ecotypes of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 2006;239:220–225. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2005.08.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Sreevatsan, S., Pan, X., Stockbauer, K.E., Connell, N.D., Kreiswirth, B.N., Whittam, T.S., Musser, J.M., 1997. Restricted structural gene polymorphism in the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex indicates evolutionarily recent global dissemination. Proceeding of the National Academy of Science USA 94, pp. 9869–9874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  18. Steele J.H. vol. 2. CRC Press Inc.; Boca Raton, Florida, USA: 1980. (Human Tuberculosis in Animals). [Google Scholar]
  19. Sulieman M.S.H.M.E. Identification of acid-fast bacteria from caseous lesions in cattle in Sudan. Journal of Veterinary Medicine B. 2002;49:415–418. doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0450.2002.00565.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Thoen C.O., Steele J.H. Iowa State University Press; Iowa, USA: 1995. Mycobacterium bovis Infection in Animals and Humans. [Google Scholar]
  21. WHO, 2008. Global Tuberculosis Control – Surveillance, Planning, Financing: WHO Report 2008. WHO/HTM/TB/2008.393, pp. 1–304.
  22. Wilton S., Cousins D. Detection and identification of multiple mycobacterial pathogens by DNA amplification in a single tube. Applied PCR Methods. 1992;1:269–273. doi: 10.1101/gr.1.4.269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES