Introduction
Survival for gastric cancer (GC) is markedly worse in the West than the East, yet components of care affecting survival have not been well defined.
Methods
Using a RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method, an international, multi-disciplinary expert panel of 16 physicians scored 2000 scenarios for GC treatments for appropriateness and necessity. Agreement was defined as 11 of 16 panelists scoring the statement as appropriate or necessary.
Results
Scoring showed the necessity of CT abdomen/pelvis for preoperative assessment, whereas CT chest, abdominal ultrasound, barium swallow and abdominal MRI were indeterminate. Routine PET is inappropriate. A diagnostic laparoscopy before initiation of curative-intent treatments is appropriate, with the exception of early gastric cancer. Sending ascites/peritoneal washings for hematoxylin and eosin examination as part of a diagnostic laparoscopy was found appropriate, whereas immunohistochemistry, polymerase chain reaction and immunoassay examinations were indeterminate. There was strong support for laparoscopic resection by surgeons with experience in both advanced laparoscopic surgery and gastric cancer management, and for a D2 lymph node dissection in patients with advanced, nonmetastatic gastric cancer. Involvement of a multi-disciplinary team before treatment initiation was felt to be necessary. In locally advanced GC (> T2N0M0 AJCC7), it is necessary to consider adjunctive therapies. For patients with metastatic disease, nonsurgical management should be sought in the absence of major symptoms. Nonemergent, curative intent resections should be performed in hospitals with an annual volume of more than 15 cases per year and by surgeons with a volume of more than 6 per year.
Conclusion
Treatment of GC has evolved substantially, requiring new recommendations for optimal processes of care for these patients.