Introduction
Stroke is an important cause of disability among adults and is one of the leading causes of death worldwide.(1) A higher proportion of younger individuals suffer from stroke among developing countries as compared with developed countries.(2) Data from India on stroke among the young are mostly limited to ischemic stroke.(3–5) There is paucity of information on stroke in young individuals covering important types of stroke.(6) Therefore, we conducted a study to study the profile of stroke cases among young adults admitted in one of the tertiary referral centers of Karnataka state.
Materials and Methods
This is a retrospective, record-based study of patients of stroke in the age group of 15-45 years admitted to two referral hospitals of Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore. The patients were identified from the medical records, starting from January 1998 to June 2008. Consent was sought for accessing the medical records. One hundred and nine patients fulfilled the WHO definition of stroke.(7) Important subtypes of stroke were included (i.e., ischemic, hemorrhagic, embolic). Patients who presented with drop attacks and loss of consciousness due to other causes were excluded. The following information was noted in a semistructured proforma: the sociodemographic patient characteristics (like age, sex and occupation), presenting symptoms, risk factors present (like hypertension,(8) diabetes mellitus,(9) smoking, alcoholism, family history, cardiac disease and dyslipidemias(10)), investigations performed and outcome following stroke.
Stroke subtypes
Cardioembolic: presence of potential cardiac sources of embolism as documented from the ECHO cardiograph.
Hemorrhagic stroke: as documented from the cranial computerized tomography (CT) scan.
Ischemic stroke: supported by axial CT or digital subtraction angiography.
Outcome of stroke
The cases were categorized into the following classes based on Activities of Daily Living (ADL):
Class 1: no significant disability or can independently perform the ADL.
Class 2: slight disability or able to carry out ADL without assistance.
Class 3: moderate disability or able to carry out ADL or walk with assistance.
Class 4: severe disability or unable to carry out ADL or walk without assistance.
Class 5: dead.(11)
Analysis
The data were fed into SPSS version 12 and analyzed. A chi-square test was used to determine whether the differences observed were statistically significant. A P-value <0.05 was considered to be significant.
Results
Of the 109 cases of stroke, 61 (56%) were ischemic stroke, 25 (22.9%) were hemorrhagic stroke and 23 (21.1%) were embolic stroke. Depending on the subtype, the numbers of case who underwent various investigations along with the proportion of those with abnormal reports are given in Table 1.
Table 1.
Number of patients who were investigated and numbers with abnormal reports

Demographic characteristics
Overall, there is male preponderance (74 out of 109) in all subtypes of stroke. Stroke is more common (78 out of 109) among the 31–45 years category as compare with the <30 years category. The occupational distribution did not show any pattern: students (3), unskilled (20), semiskilled (24), business (28) and professionals (34). Professionals included bank employees, managers and engineers in private companies.
Symptoms and disability
Cases of embolic stroke mostly presented with loss of power in the limbs. Mostly (12 cases), they woke up in the morning and noticed loss of power. Headache was more common among hemorrhagic stroke, and it occurred in the evenings, between 4 pm and 6 pm. No pattern could be observed in the headache occurring among cases of ischemic stroke. Vomiting and seizures were more common among hemorrhagic stroke than in the other stroke subtypes.
The disabilities observed were: monoplegia (right lower limb [2] , left lower limb [1] , right upper limb [4], left upper limb [2]) and hemiplegia with upper motor neuron facial palsy (right [16] , left [5]).
Risk factors
There were 76 (69.7%) smokers, 53 (48.6%) alcoholics, 59 (54.1%) diabetics and 79 (72.5%) hypertensives. Family history of stroke was present in 42 (38.5%) patients. Using the body mass index (≥25) criteria, 53 (48.6%) were overweight, of which 20 (18.3%) were males. Abnormal platelets and coagulation parameters were found in four cases, all of which had hemorrhagic stroke. Elevated homocysteine was found in three cases, all of which had ischemic stroke. Single risk factor was present in 57 (52.2%) patients, two risk factors in 68 (62.4%) and three or more risk factors in 79 (72.5%) patients. Twelve cases did not have any known risk factor. Mortality was lower (8, 7.3%) than disability (60, 55%), and 41 (37.6%) had good outcome. The distribution of patient characteristics/risk factors according to stroke subtype is given in Table 2.
Table 2.
Distribution of patient characteristics/risk factors according to stroke subtype

Investigation results
ECHO revealed the following abnormalities: hypertensive heart disease (28), rheumatic heart disease (RHD) (14), cardiomayopathy (4) and aortic stenosis (3). The involvement of mitral valve (regurgitation [6], stenosis [5]) was more common among the RHDs.
Cranial CT scan: Involvement of the middle cerebral artery territory in 18 patients was the most common finding. Digital subtraction angiography revealed abnormalities in seven (stenosis [4], occlusion [3]) patients.
Discussion
There is one comparable study from India performed on all subtypes of stroke in young adults(1) that also found that ischemic stroke was the most common subtype followed by hemorrhagic and embolic. Overall, there is a male preponderance of stroke. Studies performed on ischemic stroke among the 15–45 years age group from India also reported a male preponderance.(3,4) Similar findings have been reported from Denmark in cases of thromboembolic stroke.(12) A higher proportion of males was found among cases of ischemic stroke in studies outside India.(13,14) The proportion of cases is higher in the 31-45 years age group, which is similar to the findings reported by Nayak et al.(3) No pattern could be observed among occupation, although the proportions (56.8%) in sedentary (professional, business) occupation outnumbered the more physically active occupations (40.3%). No comparable findings were reported from Indian studies.
Presenting symptoms similar to those in our study have been reported by Chopra and Prabhakar(15) and Nayak et al.(3) Although day time onset is reported to be more common,(3,16,17) we could not find such a difference. The proportion of nonischemic strokes (44%) is slightly less than ischemic strokes (56%). Cases of ischemic stroke had a day time onset (43 out of 61), and no pattern could be observed in nonischemic stroke. This could have accounted for the differences.
Smoking, alcoholism and hypertension have been found to be significantly associated with ischemic stroke,(3,4,18) and in all subtype strokes(6) from India, which is similar to our finding. Diabetes mellitus is reported to be a risk factor for ischemic stroke from India(4) and Switzerland,(18) which was not found in our study. Diabetes was not found to be a risk factor for ischemic stroke in Sweden(19) and Taiwan.(20) Lipska et al.(4) have reported that diabetes is not a risk factor for stroke when compared with hospital-based controls. Apart from differences in patient profile (all subtypes, i.e. our study vs. ischemic stroke), there does not seem to be a consistent association between diabetes and stroke in studies conducted in various countries. Hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia are known to be associated with stroke in young adults.(18,20) Lipska et al.(4) did not find such an association in south Indian patients. The proportion of patients who did not have an abnormal lipid profile was so low in this study that we could not undertake a meaningful analysis. The role of elevated homocysteine levels requires further investigation in the Indian setting, although its association was reported from the USA.(21) A majority of the investigated cases had normal platelets and coagulation parameters, indicating that it is not an important cause of stroke in young adults. A majority of the cases had good outcome and low mortality, which is comparable with other Indian studies.(3,15)
There are some limitations in our study. Apart from inadequate numbers (in spite of including 10 years records), not all the patients underwent all the investigations, thereby making analysis and interpretations difficult. Being a tertiary care center, the referred patients’ profiles may not be representative, creating a bias. Because of paucity of information, this study gives an idea of the sample size required to undertake more detailed studies with bigger sample sizes to explore the associations and risk factors.
Footnotes
Source of Support: Nil
Conflict of Interest: None declared.
References
- 1.Bonita R, Mendis S, Truelsen T, Bogousslavsky J, Toole J, Yatsu F. The global stroke initiative. Lancet Neurol. 2004;3:391–3. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(04)00800-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Truelsen T, Bonita R, Jamrozik K. Surveillance of stroke: A global perspective. Int J Epidemiol. 2001;30:S11–6. doi: 10.1093/ije/30.suppl_1.s11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Nayak SD, Nair M, Radhakrishnan K, Sarma PS. Ischemic stroke in the young adult: Clinical features, risk factors and outcome. Natl Med J India. 1997;10:107–12. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lipska K, Sylaja PN, Sarma PS, Thankappan KR, Kutty VR, Vasan RS, et al. Risk factors for acute ischaemic stroke in young adults in South India. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007;78:959–63. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2006.106831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Srinivasan K. Ischemic cerebrovascular disease in the young: Two common causes in India. Stroke. 1984;15:733–5. doi: 10.1161/01.str.15.4.733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mehindiratta MM, Agarwal P, Sen K, Sharma B. Stroke in young adults: A study from a university hospital in north India. Med Sci Monit. 2004;10:CR535–41. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hatano S. Experience form a mulit centre stroke register: A preliminary report. Bull WHO. 1976;54:541–3. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo JL, Jr, et al. The seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: The JNC 7 report. JAMA. 2003;289:2560–72. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.19.2560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.American Diabetes Association. All about Diabetes. [last accessed on 2008 Jan 4]. Available from: http://www.diabetes.org/about-diabetes.jsp .
- 10.Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. Executive summary of The Third Report of National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert panel on Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adults Treatment Panel III) JAMA. 2001;285:2486–97. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.19.2486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Department of Health and Ageing, Government of Australia. [last accessed on 2008 Jan 4]. Available from: http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/content/
- 12.Lidegard O, Soe M, Andersen NM. Cerebral thromboembolism among young women and men from Denmark 1977 - 1982. Stroke. 1986;17:670–5. doi: 10.1161/01.str.17.4.670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lisovoski F, Rousseaux P. Cerebral infarction in young people: A study of 148 patients with cerebral angiography. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1991;54:576–7. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.54.7.576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bogousslavsky J, Regli F. Iscemic stroke in adults younger than 30 years of age: Cause and prognosis. Arch Neurol. 1987;44:479–82. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1987.00520170009012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Chopra JS, Prabhakar S. Clinical features and risk factors in stroke in young. Acta Neurol Scand. 1979;60:289–300. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1979.tb02984.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wroe SJ, Sandercock P, Bamford J, Dennis M, Slattery J, Warlow C. Diurnal variation in incidence of stroke: Oxfordshire community stroke project. BMJ. 1992;304:155–7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6820.155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kelly-Hayes M, Wolf PA, Kase CS, Brand FN, Mc Guirk JM, D‘Augustino RB, et al. Temporal patterns of stroke onset: The Framingham study. Stroke. 1995;26:1343–7. doi: 10.1161/01.str.26.8.1343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Arnold M, Halpern M, Meier N, Fischer U, Haefeli T, Kappeler L, et al. Age dependent differences in demographics, risk factors, co-morbidity, etiology, management and clinical outcome of acute ischeamic stroke. J Neurol. 2008;255:1503–7. doi: 10.1007/s00415-008-0949-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kristensen B, Malm J, Carlberg B, Stegmayr B, Backman C, Fagerlund M, et al. Epidemiology and etiology of ischemic stroke in young adults aged 18 to 44 years in northern Sweden. Stroke. 1997;28:1702–9. doi: 10.1161/01.str.28.9.1702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lee TH, Hsu WC, Chen CJ, Chen ST. Etiologic study of young ischemic stroke in Taiwan. Stroke. 2002;33:1950–5. doi: 10.1161/01.str.0000021409.16314.16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kittner SJ, Giles WH, Macko RF, Hebel JR, Wozniak MA, Wityk RJ, et al. Homocyst(e)ine and risk of cerebral infarction in a biracial population: The stroke prevention in young women study. Stroke. 1999;30:1554–60. doi: 10.1161/01.str.30.8.1554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
