Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Nucleic Acids Research logoLink to Nucleic Acids Research
. 1993 Nov 11;21(22):5101–5109. doi: 10.1093/nar/21.22.5101

SIN1 interacts with a protein that binds the URS1 region of the yeast HO gene.

D J Katcoff 1, E Yona 1, G Hershkovits 1, H Friedman 1, Y Cohen 1, O Dgany 1
PMCID: PMC310623  PMID: 8255763

Abstract

Evidence has recently been mounting suggesting that a number of chromatin components previously thought to primarily or exclusively have structural function, also have a regulatory role in eukaryotic transcription. Notably, in yeast, histone H4 N-terminal sequence has been shown to be required for promoter activation of certain genes in vivo, and mutations in histone H3 (SIN2) or in SIN1 (which has some sequence similarity to HMG1) are able to suppress swi1, swi2, and swi3 mutations, restoring transcription to HO as well as a number of other genes. In this paper we report the identification of a novel protein or protein complex that specifically binds a short sequence in the HO regulatory region on the one hand, and on the other somehow appears to contact the SIN1 protein. We have shown that the DNA binding activity itself does not contain SIN1, since extracts from sin1 delta strains retain the activity. Interestingly, extracts made from cells carrying the dominant sin1-2 point mutation lack the binding activity. Furthermore, bacterially produced sin1-2 protein can dissociate a DNA/protein complex while a similarly produced SIN1 protein has no effect on the complex at similar concentrations. When the DNA sequence to which the protein complex binds is placed in a CYC1 promoter lacking a UAS (upstream activating sequence), it can serve as a weak UAS in a SIN1 dependent way. Our data imply that a sequence specific DNA binding protein(s) may mediate between the SIN1 protein and the basal transcription apparatus transcribing HO.

Full text

PDF
5101

Images in this article

5104Image
on p.5104
5105Image
on p.5105
5105Image
on p.5105
5106Image
on p.5106
5106Image
on p.5106
5107Image
on p.5107

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Benezra R., Davis R. L., Lockshon D., Turner D. L., Weintraub H. The protein Id: a negative regulator of helix-loop-helix DNA binding proteins. Cell. 1990 Apr 6;61(1):49–59. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90214-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bianchi M. E., Beltrame M., Paonessa G. Specific recognition of cruciform DNA by nuclear protein HMG1. Science. 1989 Feb 24;243(4894 Pt 1):1056–1059. doi: 10.1126/science.2922595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bradford M. M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976 May 7;72:248–254. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bram R. J., Kornberg R. D. Specific protein binding to far upstream activating sequences in polymerase II promoters. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Jan;82(1):43–47. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.1.43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Breeden L., Nasmyth K. Cell cycle control of the yeast HO gene: cis- and trans-acting regulators. Cell. 1987 Feb 13;48(3):389–397. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90190-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Buchman A. R., Lue N. F., Kornberg R. D. Connections between transcriptional activators, silencers, and telomeres as revealed by functional analysis of a yeast DNA-binding protein. Mol Cell Biol. 1988 Dec;8(12):5086–5099. doi: 10.1128/mcb.8.12.5086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Davis J. L., Kunisawa R., Thorner J. A presumptive helicase (MOT1 gene product) affects gene expression and is required for viability in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 Apr;12(4):1879–1892. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.4.1879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Durrin L. K., Mann R. K., Kayne P. S., Grunstein M. Yeast histone H4 N-terminal sequence is required for promoter activation in vivo. Cell. 1991 Jun 14;65(6):1023–1031. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90554-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Einck L., Bustin M. The intracellular distribution and function of the high mobility group chromosomal proteins. Exp Cell Res. 1985 Feb;156(2):295–310. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(85)90539-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Giese K., Cox J., Grosschedl R. The HMG domain of lymphoid enhancer factor 1 bends DNA and facilitates assembly of functional nucleoprotein structures. Cell. 1992 Apr 3;69(1):185–195. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90129-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Grunstein M. Histone function in transcription. Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1990;6:643–678. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cb.06.110190.003235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Grunstein M. Nucleosomes: regulators of transcription. Trends Genet. 1990 Dec;6(12):395–400. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(90)90299-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Happel A. M., Swanson M. S., Winston F. The SNF2, SNF5 and SNF6 genes are required for Ty transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1991 May;128(1):69–77. doi: 10.1093/genetics/128.1.69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Herskowitz I. A regulatory hierarchy for cell specialization in yeast. Nature. 1989 Dec 14;342(6251):749–757. doi: 10.1038/342749a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Igo-Kemenes T., Hörz W., Zachau H. G. Chromatin. Annu Rev Biochem. 1982;51:89–121. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.51.070182.000513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kayne P. S., Kim U. J., Han M., Mullen J. R., Yoshizaki F., Grunstein M. Extremely conserved histone H4 N terminus is dispensable for growth but essential for repressing the silent mating loci in yeast. Cell. 1988 Oct 7;55(1):27–39. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90006-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kruger W., Herskowitz I. A negative regulator of HO transcription, SIN1 (SPT2), is a nonspecific DNA-binding protein related to HMG1. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Aug;11(8):4135–4146. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.8.4135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Landsman D., Bustin M. Assessment of the transcriptional activation potential of the HMG chromosomal proteins. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Sep;11(9):4483–4489. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.9.4483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lassar A. B., Buskin J. N., Lockshon D., Davis R. L., Apone S., Hauschka S. D., Weintraub H. MyoD is a sequence-specific DNA binding protein requiring a region of myc homology to bind to the muscle creatine kinase enhancer. Cell. 1989 Sep 8;58(5):823–831. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90935-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Laurent B. C., Yang X., Carlson M. An essential Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene homologous to SNF2 encodes a helicase-related protein in a new family. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 Apr;12(4):1893–1902. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.4.1893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lefebvre L., Smith M. Mutational and functional analysis of dominant SPT2 (SIN1) suppressor alleles in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1993 Sep;13(9):5393–5407. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.9.5393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lilley D. M. DNA--protein interactions. HMG has DNA wrapped up. Nature. 1992 May 28;357(6376):282–283. doi: 10.1038/357282a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Nasmyth K., Stillman D., Kipling D. Both positive and negative regulators of HO transcription are required for mother-cell-specific mating-type switching in yeast. Cell. 1987 Feb 27;48(4):579–587. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90236-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Peterson C. L., Herskowitz I. Characterization of the yeast SWI1, SWI2, and SWI3 genes, which encode a global activator of transcription. Cell. 1992 Feb 7;68(3):573–583. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90192-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Peterson C. L., Kruger W., Herskowitz I. A functional interaction between the C-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II and the negative regulator SIN1. Cell. 1991 Mar 22;64(6):1135–1143. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90268-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Roeder G. S., Beard C., Smith M., Keranen S. Isolation and characterization of the SPT2 gene, a negative regulator of Ty-controlled yeast gene expression. Mol Cell Biol. 1985 Jul;5(7):1543–1553. doi: 10.1128/mcb.5.7.1543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Russell D. W., Jensen R., Zoller M. J., Burke J., Errede B., Smith M., Herskowitz I. Structure of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae HO gene and analysis of its upstream regulatory region. Mol Cell Biol. 1986 Dec;6(12):4281–4294. doi: 10.1128/mcb.6.12.4281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Shirakata M., Hüppi K., Usuda S., Okazaki K., Yoshida K., Sakano H. HMG1-related DNA-binding protein isolated with V-(D)-J recombination signal probes. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Sep;11(9):4528–4536. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.9.4528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Singh J., Dixon G. H. High mobility group proteins 1 and 2 function as general class II transcription factors. Biochemistry. 1990 Jul 3;29(26):6295–6302. doi: 10.1021/bi00478a026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Smith D. B., Johnson K. S. Single-step purification of polypeptides expressed in Escherichia coli as fusions with glutathione S-transferase. Gene. 1988 Jul 15;67(1):31–40. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(88)90005-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Sternberg P. W., Stern M. J., Clark I., Herskowitz I. Activation of the yeast HO gene by release from multiple negative controls. Cell. 1987 Feb 27;48(4):567–577. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90235-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Tamkun J. W., Deuring R., Scott M. P., Kissinger M., Pattatucci A. M., Kaufman T. C., Kennison J. A. brahma: a regulator of Drosophila homeotic genes structurally related to the yeast transcriptional activator SNF2/SWI2. Cell. 1992 Feb 7;68(3):561–572. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90191-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Travers A. A. The reprogramming of transcriptional competence. Cell. 1992 May 15;69(4):573–575. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90218-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Tremethick D. J., Molloy P. L. Effects of high mobility group proteins 1 and 2 on initiation and elongation of specific transcription by RNA polymerase II in vitro. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988 Dec 9;16(23):11107–11123. doi: 10.1093/nar/16.23.11107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Wang H., Nicholson P. R., Stillman D. J. Identification of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA-binding protein involved in transcriptional regulation. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 Apr;10(4):1743–1753. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.4.1743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Wang H., Stillman D. J. In vitro regulation of a SIN3-dependent DNA-binding activity by stimulatory and inhibitory factors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Dec;87(24):9761–9765. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.24.9761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Watt F., Molloy P. L. High mobility group proteins 1 and 2 stimulate binding of a specific transcription factor to the adenovirus major late promoter. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988 Feb 25;16(4):1471–1486. doi: 10.1093/nar/16.4.1471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Winston F., Carlson M. Yeast SNF/SWI transcriptional activators and the SPT/SIN chromatin connection. Trends Genet. 1992 Nov;8(11):387–391. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(92)90300-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Winston F., Chaleff D. T., Valent B., Fink G. R. Mutations affecting Ty-mediated expression of the HIS4 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1984 Jun;107(2):179–197. doi: 10.1093/genetics/107.2.179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Nucleic Acids Research are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES