Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Chem Soc. 2011 May 6;133(21):8062–8065. doi: 10.1021/ja111613c

1H-detected 13C Photo-CIDNP as a Sensitivity Enhancement Tool in Solution NMR

Jung Ho Lee 1,, Ashok Sekhar 1,, Silvia Cavagnero 1,*,†,
PMCID: PMC3107191  NIHMSID: NIHMS295666  PMID: 21548581

Abstract

NMR is a powerful yet intrinsically insensitive technique. The applicability of NMR to chemical and biological systems would be substantially extended by new approaches going beyond current signal-to-noise capabilities. Here, we exploit the large enhancements arising from 13C photo-chemically induced dynamic nuclear polarization (13C photo-CIDNP) in solution to improve biomolecular NMR sensitivity in the context of heteronuclear correlation spectroscopy. The 13C-PRINT pulse sequence presented here involves an initial 13C nuclear spin polarization via photo-CIDNP followed by conversion to antiphase coherence and transfer to 1H for detection. We observe substantial enhancements, up to ≫200-fold, relative to the dark (laser off) experiment. Resonances of both side-chain and backbone CH pairs are enhanced for the three aromatic residues Trp, His and Tyr and the Trp-containing σ32 peptide. The sensitivity of this experiment, defined as signal-to-noise per unit time (S/N)t, is unprecedented in the NMR polarization enhancement literature dealing with polypeptides in solution. Up to a 16-fold larger (S/N)t than the 1H-13C SE-HSQC reference sequence is achieved, for the σ32 peptide. This gain leads to a reduction in data collection time up to 256-fold, highlighting the advantages of 1H-detected 13C photo-CIDNP in solution NMR.


NMR is an invaluable spectroscopic tool to probe residue-specific molecular properties such as dynamics, folding and noncovalent interactions. To date, this technique has been largely exploited to study native and nonnative states of biomolecules in solution, including peptides, proteins and nucleic acids.1

Due to either scarce sample solubility,2 the need to maintain low concentrations to overcome competing processes (e.g., aggregation), or the intrinsically low abundance of the target species in the relevant physiological environment,3 liquid-state biomolecular NMR samples are often rather dilute, requiring highly sensitive data collection. In addition, real-time kinetic studies of fast events by NMR impose a need for rapid and efficient data collection even in concentrated samples.4, 5

NMR’s low sensitivity stems from marginal nuclear polarization at thermal equilibrium. Enhanced polarization methods tackle this problem by perturbing the thermal equilibrium upon coupling nuclei to other highly polarized quantum states.6 For instance, unpaired electron polarization is transferred to nuclei in dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP).7 Parahydrogen reacts with unsaturated bonds to create 1H- polarized substrates.9 Nuclear polarization via coupling with rotational quantum states of methyl groups and entire small molecules leads to NMR signal enhancements by the Haupt effect10 and hyperfine depolarization,11 respectively. In addition, electron polarization of alkali-metals leads to hyperpolarization of noble gases via optical pumping.12 Despite the large signal enhancements attainable by the above methods, substrates amenable to these approaches are confined to the solid-state or to small molecules in liquid solution. Promising DNP methods that polarize samples directly in the liquid state13 or rely on the rapid thawing of prepolarized frozen solutions have proven effective for small molecules (e.g. urea, glucose)14 and dipeptides.15 On the other hand, the harsh rapid-dissolution procedures necessary for some of these applications are generally not desirable for large biomolecules.

A different method, photo-chemically induced dynamic nuclear polarization (photo-CIDNP) offers considerable potential and opportunities, mostly unexplored to date,5, 16, 17, 18 as an NMR sensitivity enhancement tool for the study of both small and large biomolecules examined under mild solution conditions. According to the Radical Pair Mechanism (RPM),19 photo-CIDNP20, 21 proceeds via laser-triggered formation of a transient radical pair between oxidizable amino acids (typically Trp, His and Tyr) and a light-absorbing oxidizing dye (often flavin mononucleotide, FMN). After laser irradiation, the photo-excited dye in its triplet state extracts an electron from a nearby residue, giving rise to a transient radical pair. Recombination rates back to the original species depend on the hyperfine coupling between unpaired electron and the surrounding nuclei. The effect of the hyperfine coupling can be highly nuclear-spin-state-dependent, resulting in the selectively faster recombination for one of the nuclear spin states (α or β, in case of spin-1/2 nuclei). This process leads to enrichment in the fast-recombining nuclear spins, and is the key aspect of photo-CIDNP. The fraction of molecules bearing the nuclear spin state with slower recombination rate does not effectively contribute to the net polarization. In this case, the radical pairs are often sufficiently long-lived to dissociate and then undergo rapid paramagnetic nuclear relaxation, leading to thermally equilibrated spin populations at the applied field. All nuclei in solvent-exposed oxidizable residues of polypeptides and proteins are potential photo-CIDNP candidates.

The heteronuclear photo-CIDNP sensitivity enhancement efforts carried out so far focused on the Trp indole 15N-1H bond pair, and exploited a) 15N CIDNP followed by 15N→1H nuclear polarization transfer,16 b) 1H CIDNP followed by 1H→15N→1H transfer,16, 17 c) 1H→15N nuclear polarization transfer followed by 15N CIDNP and 15N→1H transfer,18 or a combination of b) and c).18 While these studies led to promising enhancements, their applicability is limited by the fact that the 15N-1H pair in the Trp indole is the only viable probe. Furthermore, the Trp indole 15N-1H resonances tend to be poorly dispersed in nonnative proteins.22

Inspired by the established existence of 13C photo-CIDNP,23, 24 the large enhancements achieved via 1H-detected 15N heteronuclear photo-CIDNP,16, 18 and considering that there are many 13C-1H bond pairs in aromatic residues, we explored the potential of heteronuclear 1H-detected 13C photo-CIDNP. Here, we show that this effect leads to large NMR sensitivity enhancements in several 13C-1H resonances of Trp, His and Tyr, including both side chain and, intriguingly, also backbone 13Cα-1Hs. Thus, 13C photo-CIDNP followed by polarization transfer to 1H enables the highly sensitive detection of both side chain and backbone resonances in amino acids, polypeptides and proteins.

As shown in Figure 1, the 13C photo-CIDNP-enhanced constant time reverse INEPT (13C-PRINT) pulse sequence is designed to enhance 13C polarization followed by transfer to 1H for detection. In the case of emissive photo-CIDNP, the initial 13Cπ pulse constructively adds 13C longitudinal magnetization to 13C-photo-CIDNP-induced polarization. The photo-CIDNP-inducing light beam (generated via a Spectra Physics 2017-AR in multiline mode with main lines at 488 and 514 nm, operating at 5.0 and 0.5 W for 1D and 2D experiments, respectively) was guided into the NMR sample tube inside the magnet via an optical fiber.16, 17 Uniformly 13C, 15N-enriched Trp, His, Tyr, a 13-mer σ32 peptide (1.0 mM each) and the N-terminal SH3 domain of the drk adaptor protein from Drosophila (drkN SH3, 0.3 mM) were used as model substrates. All data were collected in the presence of 0.2 mM of FMN in 95%H2O/5%D2O adjusted to pH 7.0, at 24°C. The chemically synthesized σ32 peptide (see primary structure in Fig. 4) comprises the 132–144 residues of the E. coli σ32 transcriptional regulator, with Leu135 replaced by 13C,15N-Trp.25

Figure 1.

Figure 1

13C-PRINT NMR pulse sequence for 1H-detected 13C Photo-CIDNP-enhanced data collection. T is the total evolution time in the indirect dimension (13 and 27 ms for side chain and Cα carbons, respectively), for this constant-time sequence. τ is 1/4JCH (1.6 ms) and tL is the laser irradiation time. All pulses have x phase unless otherwise noted. 13C decoupling during acquisition was performed by WURST140.8 The phase cycling is φ1 = y, −y; φ2 = y, y, −x, −x, −y, −y, x, x; φrec = x, −x, −x, x. 2D experiments were run in States-TPPI mode (i.e., phase shifting of φ1, φ3, φrec concurrent with sign inversion of the last z-gradient). The initial 13C π pulse is used to constructively add emissive 13C photo-CIDNP polarization to the pre-existing 13C magnetization. In the case of absorptive 13C photo-CIDNP polarization, the π pulse is omitted.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

a) 1D NMR spectra for the 1H-detected 13C photo-CIDNP enhancement of the σ32 peptide. Experimental procedures are as in Figure 2. b) 2D dark and light 13C-PRINT spectra of the σ32 peptide. 2D data were collected according to States-TPPI with 32 increments per row and 1 scan per increment. Sweep widths of 6,000 Hz and 4,000 Hz were employed, for the direct and indirect dimensions, respectively. Black and red contours denote positive and negative resonances, respectively. Emissive 13C photo-CIDNP enhancements originate from Cδ1, Cε3 and Cη2 while absorptive enhancements are observed for Cζ2 and Cζ3. Note that emissive enhancements are phased to be positive.

Figure 2 shows that 13C-1H photo-CIDNP leads to significant increases in signal-to-noise per unit time (S/N)t for free Trp under laser-on (light) conditions, relative to both laser-off (dark) conditions and to a reference sensitivity-enhanced pulse-field-gradient 1H-13C HSQC sequence26 in constant-time mode27 (denoted as 1H-13C SE-HSQC). The observed enhancements, relative to 1H-13C SE-HSQC, are 12 and 4-fold for 13Cη2-1H and 13Cα-1H, respectively (Table 1). This result is particularly significant if one considers that 1H-13C SE-HSQC involves a full 1H→13C→1H transfer while 13C-PRINT only entails a 13C→1H transfer. Even larger enhancements (41- and 22-fold) are detected, relative to dark conditions. A second type of dark experiment, denoted as dark’, was also performed, with laser irradiation time (tL) set to 0 to minimize unnecessary signal losses due to 13C T1 relaxation in the reference experiment. The observed Trp enhancements for 13Cη2-1H and 13Cα-1H relative to the dark’ experiments are 27 and 14-fold, respectively (Table 1). Figure 2b shows how (S/N)t varies upon increasing tL. After the maximum enhancement is reached, a decrease in (S/N)t at long tL is observed under light conditions, due to reduced sample photostability and 13C T1 relaxation, both of which counteract 13C photo-CIDNP buildup. This profile shows the main drawback of photo-CIDNP, i.e., the need to properly modulate laser power and irradiation time to minimize photodegradation. Comparable photo-CIDNP enhancements are also found for His and Tyr (Fig. 3, Table 1). 13C,15N-labeled Leu and Ser, on the other hand, experience no photo-CIDNP enhancement. Note that Tyr displays a significant Cα enhancement while this effect is negligible for His. Small Cβ 13C-PRINT enhancements are also observed for Trp (data not shown). These effects are smaller in steady-state than in time-resolved CIDNP24 likely due to differences in the extent of cancellation effects.21

Figure 2.

Figure 2

a) 1D 13C-PRINT NMR spectra illustrating the 1H-detected 13C photo-CIDNP enhancements of 1.0 mM Trp in aqueous solution. A spectral window of 6,000 Hz with 2,000 complex points was used. The t1 carbon chemical shift evolution was set to 0. The relaxation delay was set to 1.5 s in all experiments. Four transients and two steady-state scans were collected. The data shown in this panel were acquired with a laser irradiation time tL corresponding to the maximum (S/N)t (see tL.dependence profiles in panel b) Spectra were phased so that resonances resulting from emissive enhancements are positive. All the NMR data shown in this work were collected on Varian INOVA 600 MHz spectrometer equipped with a triple resonance 1H{13C,15N} triple axis gradient probe. b) Dependence of 13C photo-CIDNP enhancements on the laser irradiation time tL. Experimental conditions and acquisition parameters other than tL are as in a). (S/N)t, defined as (S/N)/t 1/2, was determined as described.18 All measurements were carried out on 3 independent samples. Uncertainties are expressed as ±1 standard error of the mean. Note that an increase in tL leads to a decrease in dark (S/N)t due to 13C T1 relaxation during laser irradiation.

Table 1.

(S/N)t enhancements obtained via 1D 13C-PRINT on Trp, His, Tyr and the σ32 peptide in solution.a,b

Reference exp. Samples
Trp
His
Tyr
σ32 peptide
η2 α ε1 α δ1, δ2 ε1 ε2 α η2 δ1 α
1H-13C SE-HSQC 11.8±0.7 3.95±0.03 10.4±0.3 0.49±0.02 6.7±0.4 7.5±0.4 2.9±0.3 12±1 6.9±0.1 16±1
13C-PRINT dark 41±2 22±30 43±4 2.2±0.2 21±2 38±3 14±1 ≫200c ≫200 c 220±20
13C-PRINT dark'd 27±1 13.5±0.6 36±2 1.88±0.07 16±1 23±2 11.7±0.3 30±2 27.1±0.6 60±1
a

The tL value giving rise to maximums signal under light conditions (see Figure 2, 3) were used, for calculating the enhancements in this table.

b

All uncertainties were propagated considering the ±1 standard error in (S/N)t resulting from 3 independent measurements.

c

No explicit (S/N)t could be evaluated for these experiments because the dark spectrum lacked any detectable signal beyond the noise, even for prolonged data collection (64 transients).

d

The notation dark’ denotes dark reference experiments with tL set to 0 s.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Laser irradiation time dependence of photo-CIDNP enhancements of a) His and b) Tyr via 13C-PRINT. Experimental parameters and error analysis are as in Figure 2. The initial 13C π pulse was omitted for the data collection on Tyr Cα because the photo-CIDNP enhancement is absorptive, in this case.

To directly address the method’s applicability to larger biological systems, we analyzed the σ32 model polypeptide, as shown in Figure 4. Interestingly, even larger enhancements than in the case of free Trp are observed for the σ32 peptide. 13C-PRINT yields 16-fold larger (S/N)t than 1H-13C SE-HSQC for Cα, which is 4-fold larger than the enhancement observed for free Trp (Table 1). Photo-CIDNP enhancement patterns are also different for the side chain 13Cs of free Trp and the σ32 peptide’s Trp. Specifically, a dramatic enhancement is observed for 13Cδ1 of the σ32 peptide Trp while a negligible effect is detected for the corresponding nucleus of free Trp (Figs 4 and S1, and Table 1). Therefore, 13C photo-CIDNP enhancement patterns can be sensitive to the surrounding chemical environment.

In order to illustrate the power of 13C photo-CIDNP in cases where high resolution is critical, 2D 13C-PRINT data were collected for the σ32 peptide (Fig. 4b). Mild laser irradiation (power = 0.5W, tL = 0.1sec) was employed in this case, to optimize sample photostability (<5% degradation) during data collection. Significant enhancements are evident here too (Fig. 4b). A comparison between Figures 4b, S1 and S2 illustrates how (S/N)t is maximized, in the case of emissive photo-CIDNP (e.g. see Trp 13Cε3, 13Cη2), by retaining the initial 13C π pulse.

Finally, we collected 2D 13C-PRINT data on drkN SH3, a protein that populates both native and unfolded states in slow exchange on the NMR chemical shift timescale (Supp. Fig. S3). The greatest (S/N)t enhancements, up to 2.4-fold relative to 1H-13C SE-HSQC, were observed for the Trp36 and Tyr52 1H-13Cα pairs in the unfolded state, Moderate enhancements (up to 1.7-fold) were also observed for the partially solvent-exposed Trp36 in the native state. The above experiments concisely illustrate the fact that 13C-PRINT is an extremely sensitive tool to probe amino acid, peptide and protein backbone conformation.

Comparisons between 13C-PRINT enhancements of amino acids, peptide and protein (Figs. 2, 4 and S3) show different relative intensities and signs. We ascribe these variations to a combination of (a) the greater extent of exchange and recombination cancellation expected for amino acids, relative to proteins, and (b) the different hyperfine constants arising from changes in electronic distribution of the different species, likely due to differences in primary structure, conformation and protonation state of the radical cation within the transient radical ion pair.21

In summary, this work demonstrates the power of 13C photo-CIDNP in heteronuclear correlation NMR. Indeed, 1H-detected 13C photo-CIDNP leads to sensitivity enhancement for both side-chain and backbone CH pairs in amino acids, peptides and proteins in solution. The σ32 peptide sensitivity enhancement, up to 16-fold over SE-HSQC, yields a reduction in data collection time up to 256-fold and highlights the promise of this approach. 13Cα-1H enhancements are particularly noteworthy, as these nuclei are robust reporters of backbone secondary structure. While 13C-PRINT is tailored to enhance resonances from specific solvent-exposed residues (Tyr, Trp and His), recent advances suggest that in the future it may be possible to transfer photo-CIDNP-enhanced Cα and side chain C magnetization to other nearby nuclei via NOE.28 We anticipate that the 1H-detected 13C photo-CIDNP method highlighted in this work will prove useful to study of both equilibrium biological processes in dilute solutions and kinetic time-courses demanding rapid data collection.

Supplementary Material

1_si_001

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Alexandra Yurkovskaya, Lewis Kay, Charles Fry and Milo Westler for helpful discussions, to Robert Shanks for technical assistance, and to Julie Forman-Kay for donating the drkN SH3 plasmid. This research was funded by the National Institute of Health Grant R21AI088551.

Footnotes

Supporting Information Available: This file includes 2D 13C-PRINT data on Trp, σ32 peptide (with no initial 13C π pulse), and drkN SH3. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

References

  • 1.(a) Wright PE, Dyson HJ. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2009;19:31. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2008.12.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Dyson HJ, Wright PE. Chem Rev. 2004;104:3607. doi: 10.1021/cr030403s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Gardner KH, Kay LE. Annu Rev Biophys Biomolec Struct. 1998;27:357. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biophys.27.1.357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Farrow NA, Muhandiram R, Singer AU, Pascal SM, Kay CM, Gish G, Shoelson SE, Pawson T, Formankay JD, Kay LE. Biochemistry. 1994;33:5984. doi: 10.1021/bi00185a040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.(a) Kurt N, Rajagopalan S, Cavagnero S. J Mol Biol. 2006;355:809. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.10.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Kurt N, Cavagnero S. Biophys J. 2008;94:L48. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.107.127647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.(a) Rajagopalan S, Chow C, Raghunathan V, Fry CG, Cavagnero S. J Biomol NMR. 2004;29:505. doi: 10.1023/B:JNMR.0000034354.30702.de. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Bakke CK, Jungbauer LM, Cavagnero S. Protein Expr Purif. 2006;45:381. doi: 10.1016/j.pep.2005.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.(a) Frydman L, Scherf T, Lupulescu A. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:15858. doi: 10.1073/pnas.252644399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Gal M, Schanda P, Brutscher B, Frydman L. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:1372. doi: 10.1021/ja066915g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Giraudeau P, Shrot Y, Frydman L. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:13902. doi: 10.1021/ja905096f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Shapira B, Morris E, Muszkat KA, Frydman L. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:11756. doi: 10.1021/ja0461668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Köckenberger W, Matysik J. Hyperpolarization Methods and Applications in NMR. In: John CL, editor. Encyclopedia of Spectroscopy and Spectrometry. Elsevier; Oxford: 2010. p. 963. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.(a) Overhauser AW. Physical Review. 1953;92:411. [Google Scholar]; (b) Carver TR, Slichter CP. Physical Review. 1953;92:212. [Google Scholar]; (c) Griffin RG, et al. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2010;12:5725–5928. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kupce E, Freeman R. J Magn Reson Ser A. 1995;115:273. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Natterer J, Bargon J. Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc. 1997;31:293. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Haupt J. Phys Lett A. 1972;38:389. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.(a) Rakitzis TP, Samartzis PC, Toomes RL, Kitsopoulos TN, Brown A, Balint-Kurti GG, Vasyutinskii OS, Beswick JA. Science. 2003;300:1936. doi: 10.1126/science.1084809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Van Brunt RJ, Zare RN. J Chem Phys. 1968;48:4304. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.(a) Navon G, Song Y, Room T, Appelt S, Taylor RE, Pines A. Science. 1996;271:1848. [Google Scholar]; (b) Goodson BM. J Magn Reson. 2002;155:157. doi: 10.1006/jmre.2001.2341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.(a) Reese M, Turke MT, Tkach I, Parigi G, Luchinat C, Marquardsen T, Tavernier A, Hofer P, Engelke F, Griesinger C, Bennati M. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:15086. doi: 10.1021/ja905959n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Lingwood MD, Han SG. J Magn Reson. 2009;201:137. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2009.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Loening NM, Rosay M, Weis V, Griffin RG. J Am Chem Soc. 2002;124:8808. doi: 10.1021/ja026660g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.(a) Ardenkjaer-Larsen JH, Fridlund B, Gram A, Hansson G, Hansson L, Lerche MH, Servin R, Thaning M, Golman K. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:10158. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1733835100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Joo CG, Casey A, Turner CJ, Griffin RG. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:12. doi: 10.1021/ja805521y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Vasos PR, Comment A, Sarkar R, Ahuja P, Jannin S, Ansermet JP, Konter JA, Hautle P, van den Brandt B, Bodenhausen G. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:18469. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0908123106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lyon CE, Jones JA, Redfield C, Dobson CM, Hore PJ. J Am Chem Soc. 1999;121:6505. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sekhar A, Cavagnero S. J Phys Chem B. 2009;113:8310. doi: 10.1021/jp901000z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sekhar A, Cavagnero S. J Magn Reson. 2009;200:207. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2009.07.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.(a) Kaptein R, Oosterhoff JL. Chem Phys Lett. 1969;4:195. [Google Scholar]; (b) Closs GL, Closs LE. J Am Chem Soc. 1969;91:4550. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.(a) Bargon J, Fischer H, Johnson U. Z Naturforsch A. 1967;22:1551. [Google Scholar]; (b) Ward HR, Lawler RG. J Am Chem Soc. 1967;89:5518. [Google Scholar]; (c) Kaptein R, Dijkstra K, Nicolay K. Nature. 1978;274:293. doi: 10.1038/274293a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Closs GL, Miller RJ, Redwine OD. Accounts Chem Res. 1985;18:196. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hore PJ, Broadhurst RW. Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc. 1993;25:345. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Schlorb C, Mensch S, Richter C, Schwalbe H. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128:1802. doi: 10.1021/ja056757d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.(a) Lippmaa E, Pehk T, Buchachenko AL, Rykov SV. Chem Phys Lett. 1970;5:521. [Google Scholar]; (b) Thamarath SS, Heberle J, Hore PJ, Kottke T, Matysik J. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:15542. doi: 10.1021/ja1082969. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kiryutin AS, Morozova OB, Kuhn LT, Yurkovskaya AV, Hore PJ. J Phys Chem B. 2007;111:11221. doi: 10.1021/jp073385h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.McCarty JS, Rudiger S, Schonfeld HJ, Schneider-Mergener J, Nakahigashi K, Yura T, Bukau B. J Mol Biol. 1996;256:829. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kay LE, Keifer P, Saarinen T. J Am Chem Soc. 1992;114:10663. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Cavanagh J. Protein NMR spectroscopy: principles and practice. Academic Pr; 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Mok KH, Kuhn LT, Goez M, Day IJ, Lin JC, Andersen NH, Hore PJ. Nature. 2007;447:106. doi: 10.1038/nature05728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1_si_001

RESOURCES