Abstract
Implantation, a critical step for establishing pregnancy, requires molecular and cellular events resulting in uterine growth and differentiation, blastocyst adhesion, invasion, and placental formation. Successful implantation requires a receptive endometrium, a normal and functional embryo at the blastocyst stage, and a synchronized dialogue between maternal and embryonic tissues. In addition to the well-characterized role of sex steroids, the complexity of embryo implantation and placentation is exemplified by the number of cytokines and growth factors with demonstrated roles in these processes. Disturbances in the normal expression and action of these cytokines result in an absolute or partial failure of implantation and abnormal placental formation in mice and human. Members of the gp130 cytokine family, interleukin-11 (IL-11) and leukemia inhibitory factor, the transforming growth factor beta superfamily, the colony-stimulating factors, and the IL-1 and IL-15 systems are crucial molecules for a successful implantation. Chemokines are also important, both in recruiting specific cohorts of leukocytes to the implantation site and in trophoblast trafficking and differentiation. This review provides discussion of the embryonic and uterine factors that are involved in the process of implantation in autocrine, paracrine, and/or juxtacrine manners at the hormonal, cellular, and molecular levels.
Keywords: Blastocyst, endometrium, implantation, pregnancy, uterine biology
The term growth factor corresponds to a family of secreted signaling proteins capable of inducing proliferation and differentiation in cells. Growth factors typically act as initiators of signaling cascades in cells by paracrine and endocrine interactions.1 Examples are cytokines and hormones that bind to specific receptors on the surface of their target cells, typically initiating a variety of cellular processes.2 They often promote cell differentiation and maturation, whose specificity varies among growth factors. For example, bone morphogenic proteins stimulate bone cell differentiation, and fibroblast growth factors and vascular endothelial growth factors stimulate blood vessel differentiation (vasculogenesis and angiogenesis).3
Cytokines, a family of soluble proteins, were thought to be produced only in the bone marrow, immune system, and circulating blood cells when first identified.3,4 Later, it was shown that these proteins are produced in many tissues including reproductive and embryonic tissues.5,6 The term growth factor is sometimes used interchangeably with the term cytokine. Whereas growth factor implies a positive effect on cell division, cytokine is a neutral term with respect to whether a molecule affects proliferation. In this sense, some cytokines can be growth factors, such as granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor.7 However, some cytokines have an inhibitory effect on cell growth or proliferation. Yet others, such as the Fas ligand, are used as “death” signals; they cause target cells to undergo programmed cell death, or apoptosis.
Growth factors can be classified according to both structural and evolutionary associations, ordering them into larger families of proteins. Recent years have seen a great increase in the number of growth factors identified and growth factor families such as bone morphogenic protein (BMP), fibroblast growth factor (FGF), transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β), neurotrophins (nerve growth factor [NGF], brain-derived neurotrophic factor [BDNF], and neurotrophin [NT3]), colony stimulating factors (CSF), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), erythropoietin (EPO), thrombopoietin (TPO), myostatin (GDF-8), growth differentiation factor 9 (GDF-9), epidermal growth factors (EGFs), hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), and more.8 Their role in implantation is becoming increasingly well understood.
Implantation necessitates complex interactions among the developing embryo, decidualizing endometrium, and developing maternal immune tolerance and/ or alterations in cellular and humoral immune responses. All of these cellular and molecular events are controlled by endocrine hormones, including sex steroids and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), and by local paracrine factors. Such factors are produced by the endometrial epithelium, decidualized stromal cells, and immune cells; they are secreted locally into the uterine lumen and the area of the decidual reaction, where they affect not only blastocyst development, attachment, and invasion, but also each others’ cellular functions and the transformation of the decidualizing extracellular matrix. These locally produced signaling molecules consist of growth factors, cytokines, and chemokines.5,9
Development of the embryo to the blastocyst stage, its implantation into the endometrium, and the formation of a functional placenta are essential steps in the establishment of pregnancy. Like many developmental processes, pregnancy involves a complicated series of genetic, molecular, and cellular interactions, all of which must be executed within an optimal time frame. In mammals, the fertilized egg undergoes many cell divisions to form a blastocyst, which is able to attach to the uterine epithelium. The implantation process starts when a free-floating blastocyst communicates with the endometrium. The adhesive interactions between the trophoblasts and the endometrial surface epithelium are followed by local invasion.5,10,11 Therefore, implantation requires the synchronous development of a blastocyst competent to implant and an endometrium able to respond to signals from the blastocyst. Countless endocrine, paracrine, and autocrine interactions during implantation occur among maternal-maternal, embryo-embryonic, and maternal-embryonic cells that mediate a complex dialogue between endometrium and the conceptus. These developmental events are orchestrated by sex steroids, hCG, growth factors, cytokines, adhesion molecules, the extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins, and prostaglandins.5
Many crucial growth factors and cytokines affect blastocyst implantation and/or endometrial receptivity; however, the molecular mechanisms regulating this process in human is still poorly understood and needs further study to have clinical treatment options for infertility patients related to implantation failure or embryo rejection. The incidence of early pregnancy loss during or immediately after implantation is high, estimated at 25 to 40%.12 Of the pregnancies that are lost, most are lost very early and represent a failure of implantation. Failed implantation is also a major limiting factor in assisted reproduction.13 Implantation failure has been estimated to be related to inadequate endometrial receptivity in up to two thirds of cases.14 Endometriosis, endocrine abnormalities, thrombophilias, immunological factors, and congenital and acquired anatomical factors may contribute to implantation failure.15 In this review, we focus on recent developments in implantation biology and discuss the significance of growth factors and cytokines involved in the implantation processes.
EBRYONIC DEVELOPMENT IN PREIMPLANTION PERIOD
Successful embryonic development in the preimplantation period in many species depends on timely activations and spatial control of maternal and embryonic genes. Maternally derived mRNAs in the oocyte are translationally activated while transcription is silent during oocyte maturation. Zygotic gene activation (ZGA) refers to the first activation of gene expression after fertilization. Following fertilization, ZGA occurs within a short time interval depending on the species; for example, it occurs at the two-cell or four- to eight-cell stage in mouse and human, respectively.16,17 Until ZGA, maternal proteins and transcripts stored in oocytes control embryonic development, indicating the importance of maternal factors in early reproductive events.18 Transcription from the newly formed zygotic genome establishes the gene expression patterns that are required for continued development. At the morula stage the embryo undergoes a reorganization processes at the cellular level, called compaction. This is the first stage during which obvious morphological differentiation can be observed. The appearance of an inner cavity within the mass of cells corresponds to the initiation of the blastocyst formation;19 this results in the appearance of two distinct types of cells: the outer cell mass, also called trophectoderm (TE), and the inner cell mass (ICM). TE gives rise to the trophoblasts and extraembryonic structures such as placenta; the ICM gives rise to the embryo.20,21 Several genes have been identified in the mouse that are crucial for this cell lineage segregation, including Oct4, Sox2, Nanog, Cdx2, and Eomesodermin (Eomes).22 Fig. 1 and Table 1 summarize their cell-specific expression and functions.
Figure 1.
Lineage differentiation during 8-cell to blastocyst transition and gene expression patterns during mouse blastocyst formation. Oct4 is expressed throughout the embryo before the late morula and crucial for the formation of inner cell mass. The expression of Nanog is induced in the inside cells of the late morula. Cdx2 is expressed in trophectoderm. Gata6 is expressed in the primitive endoderm of the late blastocyst. 2PN, two pronuclei.
Table 1.
Function of Transcription Factors Known to Be Important for the Fate of Trophectoderm and the Inner Cell Mass
Gene | Function | References |
---|---|---|
Oct4 | Expressed in nuclei of all cells of the early embryo, but its expression becomes restricted to the ICM upon blastocyst formation, preventing TE formation | Kirchhof et al, 2000190 |
Sox2 | A similar expression profile to Oct4, preventing trophoblast specification | Avilion et al, 2003191 |
Nanog | Sustaining the self-renewal capacity of embryonal stem cells and inhibiting their differentiation, ICM formation, and visceral-parietal endoderm formation | Mitsui et al, 2003192 |
Cdx2 | Segregating ICM and TE lineages by ensuring the suppression of Oct4 and Nanog | Niwa et al, 2005193 |
Eomes | Required for TE proliferation and differentiation at the blastocyst stage | Simmons and Cross26 |
Lefty-1 | Determining the left–right axis in mouse embryos | Takaoka et al23 |
ICM, inner cell mass; TE, trophectoderm.
During the early stage of blastocyst formation, an ICM-specific gene, named Lefty-1, was described in mouse embryos. Surprisingly, Lefty expression is restricted to a small subset of cells in the ICM of the early blastocyst, and the expression is localized to a region of the primitive endoderm (PE) in late-stage blastocyst.23 Although the ICM is initially a mosaic of epiblast (EPI) and PE cells, these observations support the notion that patterning of the embryonic axis may exist as early as the blastocyst stage.24 The asymmetries of the blastocyst and the later axes of the embryo suggest that early asymmetries in the relationships between the different lineages of the blastocyst will play roles in establishing later embryonic patterning. During the blastocyst stage, the TE starts to hatch from its glycoprotein coat, the zona pellucida, and acquires the ability to attach to the endometrium. At the same time, the uterine environment is able to support blastocyst growth, attachment, and the subsequent events of implantation.25 Therefore, a successful implantation depends on two important factors: blastocyst competency and endometrial receptivity. Together these are responsible for the embryo–maternal interaction necessary for the attachment and invasion of the blastocyst into the endometrium.
Recent studies on mice have identified several genes involved in the differentiation of trophoblast cell subtypes. Hand1, Stra13, and Imfa are transacting factors that are expressed specifically in trophoblastic giant cells, the main invasive cell type mediating implantation in the mouse, as well as the main endocrine cells of the placenta. These cells produce several hormones that regulate the maternal endocrine and immune systems and promote maternal blood flow to the implantation site. Decidual prolactin like A (Prlpa) gene expression decreases in the uterus adjacent to Hand1- and Ets2-deficient embryos, suggesting that normal trophoblast giant cells in the placenta are required for the conceptus-dependent effects on Prlpa expression in the mesometrial decidua. Moreover, these cells also express placental lactogen 1 and 2, a type 1 interferon-like molecule that has the ability to induce G1p2 expression in endometrial stromal cells.26 These results suggest that molecular signals from the mouse embryo have local effects on uterine gene expression during decidualization. However, these genes remain to be investigated in human embryos and decidual tissues to determine if their human homologs are expressed and function as in mouse embryos and decidua.
IMPLANTATION PROCESS
The human endometrium undergoes a complex series of organized proliferative and secretory changes in each menstrual cycle.27 When implantation does not occur, there is a deliberate and timely destruction of the fully developed endometrium, leading to menstruation, only for the same cycle of events to be repeated once again to prepare for the next blastocyst. However, if implantation does occur, the endometrium continues to grow and undergo further morphological and molecular changes to provide sufficient support for the growing embryo.27,28
Blastocyst implantation in the uterine endometrium is a highly coordinated event that depends on an intrinsic embryonic program operating in conjunction with extrinsic signals from the receptive uterus. In the past decade, many factors influencing the implantation process have been identified, and many researchers have focused on embryonic and maternal factors such as calcitonin, growth factors, integrins, cytokines, and ovarian hormones. For mammalian development to proceed beyond the first week, the embryo must establish intimate contact with uterine tissues and form a placenta that will provide an interface between the growing fetus and the maternal circulation.29 Uterine-derived signals, for example calcitonin, heparin-binding epidermal growth factor-like growth factor (HB-EGF), insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 (IGFBP-1), and lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) maintain the pace of blastocyst development and mobilize embryonic receptors used for subsequent signaling. The blastocyst is primed to advance in development only after it receives the necessary external signals from the decidua.30
The process of implantation is classified into three phases: apposition, attachment (adhesion), and penetration (invasion). Apposition is identified as an unstable adhesion of the blastocyst to the endometrial surface. During this stage, the trophoblast becomes closely apposed to the luminal epithelium.31 This is followed by a stable adhesion or attachment phase. Local paracrine signaling between the embryo and endometrium is believed to occur to trigger a stronger attachment. The first sign of the attachment reaction occurs on the evening of day 4 in mice, or day 20 to 21 in humans, and it coincides with a localized increase in the stromal vascular permeability at the site of blastocyst attachment.32 Penetration involves invasion of the embryo through the luminal epithelium and its basal lamina into the stroma, to establish a vascular relationship with the mother, and this activity is mainly controlled by trophoblasts; however the decidua also limits the extent of invasion.33 In response to this invasion and the presence of constant progesterone stimulation, the endometrial stromal cells and endometrial extracellular matrix undergo decidualization. The timely completion of attachment and decidualization are essential for the viability of the pregnancy. Human chorionic gonadotropin is one of the molecules that stimulate decidualization.34,35 In most species, hCG secreted by the embryo is detectable in maternal serum within 8 to 10 days of ovulation.32,36
HORMONAL AND MOLECULAR DETERMINANTS OF IMPLANTATION
Endometrial receptivity can be defined as the capacity of the uterine mucosa to facilitate successful embryonic implantation. The timing of implantation has now been firmly established, occurring ~7 to 10 days after ovulation, corresponding to days 21 to 24 of an idealized 28-day menstrual cycle.37 Endometrial receptivity is manifested by molecular and genetic markers including cytokines (interleukin-6 [IL-6], IL-11), growth factors (EGF, TGF-β, FGF), transcription factors (Hox), and ovarian hormones (Table 2).38
Table 2.
Reproductive Function in Animals with Targeted Disruption of Genes Important in Implantation
Gene | Reproductive Function | References |
---|---|---|
LIF | Failure of implantation, unable to induce decidualization | Stewart et al70 |
IL-6 | Reduced fertility; viable implantation sites decreased 48% | Robertson et al78 |
IL-11 | Fertility defect, which, unlike that in the LIF-deficient mice, occurs in the postimplantation response to the implanting blastocyst | Laird et al55 |
IL-15 | Fertile, but display impaired decidual integrity, unmodified spiral arteries, and lack of uNK at the implantation sites | Ashkar et al98 |
LIFR | Intrauterine lethality | Ware et al73 |
TGF-β1 | Intrauterine and early postnatal lethality | Kulkarni and Karlsson128 |
HOXA10 | Oviductal transformation of the proximal third of the uterus, defective implantation and embryonic reabsorption in the early postimplantation period | Benson et al174 |
HOXA11 | Diminished uterine glands; partial homeotic transformation of uterus to oviduct, defective implantation | Hsieh et al194 |
Hormones
SEX STEROIDS
Progesterone and estrogen have important interrelated roles in many systems and processes required for mammalian reproduction. The female reproductive tract, including the uterus, ovaries, as well as mammary glands, are all targets of both estrogen and progesterone action. Progesterone is essential for implantation and pregnancy maintenance in all mammals, whereas the requirement for estrogen is species specific.5 Estrogen is important for the proliferation of the uterine epithelium and enhances progesterone action via induction of the progesterone receptor (PR) gene. Progesterone plays a role in proliferation, differentiation, and maintenance of endometrial stromal and glandular cells and myometrial cells.39
The uterine effects of estrogen and progesterone are primarily executed by nuclear estrogen and progesterone (ER and PR) receptors.40 The discovery of ER (ERα and ERβ) and PR (PR-A and PR-B) isoforms and studies of the effects of their selective deletion provide evidence for their isoforms-specific functions in uterine biology and implantation. The uterus of ERα knockout (αERKO) mice develops normally but remains immature, remaining hypoplastic, and is unable to support implantation (Table 3).41 The phenotype of the αERKO uterus indicates that ERα does have an essential role in uterine physiology. Studies using tissue recombination have indicated that ERα need only be present in the stromal compartment for epithelial mitogenesis to occur because stromal cells from wild-type mice cultured together with epithelial cells from αERKO uterus are capable of estrogen-dependent induction of DNA synthesis in the epithelial cells.42 In contrast, the ERβ−/− mouse uterus retains biological functions that allow normal implantation.5
Table 3.
Reproductive Function in Animals with Targeted Disruption of ER and PR Genes in Implantation
Gene | Reproductive (Uterine and Implantation) Phenotype | References |
---|---|---|
ERa | Infertile owing to loss of ovarian function, immature uteri, unresponsive to estrogen | Hewitt and Korach41 |
ERb | Subfertile owing to reduced ovarian efficiency, enhanced response to estrogen | Harris, 2007195 |
PRA | Infertile, subovulatory, unable to induce and support decidualization | Mulac-Jericevic, 2000196 |
PRB | Fertile, normal ovarian and uterine response to progesterone | Mulac-Jericevic, 2003197 |
PR (PR A and PR B) | Infertile, anovulatory | J.P. Lydon, 1995198 |
Interestingly, progesterone is sufficient for decidualization in ERα−/− mice in response to artificial stimuli, which indicates that ERα might be essential for blastocyst attachment but is dispensable for subsequent decidualization.43,44 Analysis of the reproductive phenotypes of PR knockout mice (PRAKO or PRBKO) has indicated that PR-A and PR-B mediate mostly distinct but partially overlapping reproductive responses. Selective ablation of the PR-A protein (PRAKO) shows a normal mammary gland response to progesterone but severe uterine hyperplasia and ovarian abnormalities leading to female infertility (Table 2). In contrast, ablation of PR-B protein (PRBKO mice) does not affect biological responses of the ovary or uterus to progesterone but results in reduced pregnancy-associated mammary gland morphogenesis. These tissue-selective activities of PR-B are due to this isoform’s ability to regulate a subset of progesterone-responsive target genes in reproductive tissues rather than to differences in its spatiotemporal expression relative to the PR-A iso-form.45
Growth factors, particularly EGF and transforming growth factor alpha (TGFα), have gained attention as mediators of estrogen mitogenic action. In vivo experiments showed a mitogenic action of EGF on the reproductive tract of estrogen-deprived mice.46 Subsequent studies found that an antiestrogen compound blocked the mitogenic effect of EGF on the mouse reproductive tract, suggesting that EGF was acting via the estrogen receptor.47 Johnson and Chatterjee showed that EGF initiates implantation under some conditions. Although ineffective in delayed implanting ovariectomized or hypophysectomized rats treated with progesterone, a single intravenous dose of EGF initiated implantation of blastocysts that were transferred to progesterone-primed hypophysectomized rats.48 Uterine EGF and its receptor are important factors in initiating implantation and increase in response to estrogen. Even though many of the physiological roles of estrogen and progesterone have been outlined, the molecular networks that mediate their actions other than their receptor-mediated genomic activation are largely unknown. Further studies are required to determine the possible interaction among the growth factors and cytokines-mediated intracellular signaling cascades and estrogen and progesterone pathways leading to successful implantation.
HUMAN CHORIONIC GONADOTROPIN
Human chorionic gonadotropin belongs to the family of glycoprotein hormones that include follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), and thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH). It plays an important role in the implantation process and is principally produced by syncytiotrophoblasts and some tumors.49 It affects several processes during pregnancy, besides the well-known maintenance of the corpus luteum; these include cell growth, differentiation, and immunosuppression. The trophoblasts themselves express a truncated and inactive hCG receptor until the 9th week of gestation, and then switch to expression of the full-length receptor, allowing hCG autocrine regulation of various functions including cell differentiation in the trophoblasts.50 Functional hCG/LH receptors are also expressed on both cytotrophoblasts and syncytiotrophoblasts and stimulate the differentiation of cytotrophoblasts into syncytiotrophoblasts in response to hCG. In vitro hCG increases invasiveness of trophoblastic choriocarcinoma cell lines;51 however, in vitro studies of primary trophoblast showed the opposite effect.52,53 Therefore, the influence of hCG on trophoblast in vivo invasion remains unclear. In addition to its effect on decidualization,49 hCG administration modulates the secretion of endometrial paracrine factors, leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF), macrophage colony stimulating factor (M-CSF), and IGFBP-1.50 Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) was significantly stimulated by hCG, suggesting a role for hCG in the control of endometrial vascularization and placentation.54 In summary, hCG seems to have a variety of local and systemic functions both in and outside the embryo-endometrial microenvironment.
Cytokines
LEUKEMIA INHIBITORY FACTOR
LIF is a secreted glycoprotein first described as a factor that induces macrophage differentiation of the myeloid leukemia cell line M1. LIF, a member of the IL-6 type cytokine family, has a variety of functions, including stimulation of cell proliferation, differentiation, and survival—all functions that are essential for blastocyst development and implantation.55 The pleiotropic effects of LIF are accomplished by binding to heterodimeric LIF receptor (LIFR), which consists of two transmembrane proteins, LIFR and gp130. The LIF receptor activates several signaling pathways in diverse cells types, including the Jak/STAT, MAPK, and PI3-kinase (PIPK) pathways.56 In the endometrium of a fertile woman, LIF protein and mRNA are expressed throughout the menstrual cycle with a striking increase in the mid- and late-secretory phase and in early pregnancy.57,58 LIF mRNA and protein are localized mostly in the glandular and luminal epithelium as well as in stroma.59–61 Strong expression of LIF mRNA has also been detected in human decidual leukocytes, which are abundant at the implantation site, suggesting that LIF may mediate interactions between maternal decidual leukocytes and invading cytotrophoblasts.62 In humans, progesterone is likely one of the regulators of LIF expression, although locally produced factors, including HB-EGF and TGF-β1, regulate LIF secretion in cultured endometrial stromal cells in vitro in a concentration- and time-dependent manner57,63 and may also be relevant in vivo. Song et al showed that the expression of several members of the EGF family are downregulated in LIF-deficient uteri during implantation, although their receptors (erbBs) are sufficiently expressed.64
LIF protein has been detected in human uterine flushings during the time of expected implantation in fertile women, with gradually increasing concentrations from days LH + 7 to LH + 12. Interestingly, the concentration of LIF in flushings from women with unexplained infertility was significantly lower than those obtained from fertile women at the same time.65,66 Furthermore, it has been shown that mutations in the LIF gene may decrease the biological activity of LIF in the endometrium and cause an implantation failure.67 However, screening of women with unexplained infertility and with recurrent failure of implantation after in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment for LIF mutations did not reveal that LIF gene mutations play any crucial role in the etiology of unexplained infertility and IVF failure.68
The uterine milieu in LIF mutant mice fails to induce implantation irrespective of the blastocyst genotypes because LIF(−/−) blastocysts can implant after transfer to wild-type pseudopregnant recipients (Table 2).69,70 These reciprocal embryo transfer experiments suggest that maternal LIF is essential for blastocyst implantation. However, a role for this cytokine in embryonic functions cannot be ignored because LIFR and gp130 are expressed at the blastocyst stage, and administration of exogenous LIF improves embryo viability and hatching in several species.71,72 Taken together, these data suggest that both the preimplantation embryo and the uterus are sites of LIF action. However, embryos lacking either LIFR or gp130 develop to the blastocyst stage and implant normally but die during the perinatal period.73 Thus LIF may signal to both embryonic and uterine cells during implantation.65 Gp130 deficiency in mice leads to embryonic lethality.74 Gp130 mRNA localizes predominantly to glandular and luminal epithelium in human endometrium60 and has also been demonstrated in human embryos from three-cell stage onward.75 Soluble gp130 is secreted from endometrial tissues obtained from women between days 20 and 26 of the menstrual cycle at a 20-fold higher concentration to the proliferative phase. Importantly, secretion of soluble gp130 from endometrial tissues obtained between days LH + 6 and LH + 13 is reduced in infertile women compared with fertile women.76 These data cumulatively show that the presence of such soluble receptors in the endometrium has important implications in cytokine action.
INTERLEUKIN-6
IL-6 is a multifunctional cytokine that plays important roles in host defense, immune response, acute phase reaction, and hematopoiesis. IL-6 has some functional redundancy with IL-11 and LIF. IL-6 exerts its activity through binding to a high-affinity receptor complex consisting of two membrane proteins (IL-6R and gp130).77 IL-6-deficient mice have reduced fertility and a decrease in viable implantation sites78 (Table 2).
In human endometrium, IL-6 is weakly expressed during the proliferative phase, but strong epithelial immunoreactivity is present during the midsecretory phase when the implantation window opens.31 Furthermore, IL-6 secretion by endometrial stromal cells is enhanced by interferon-γ.79 In first-trimester trophoblasts, IL-6 protein and mRNA are present in both cytotrophoblastic and the syncytiotrophoblastic cells. Expression of this cytokine decreases significantly during differentiation of cytotrophoblastic cells into syncytiotrophoblast and that IL-6 concentration is found to be higher in decidual tissue than in placental tissue.80,81 Moreover, the IL-6-R is predominantly localized in glandular epithelium and to lesser extent in the stroma throughout the menstrual cycle.31 Therefore, a role in human implantation could also be postulated for this cytokine as for LIF. When levels of IL-6 secretion were measured from endometrial biopsies obtained between days LH + 6 and LH + 13 from infertile women compared with fertile women, no difference was found.76 However, a recent study showed that endometrial expression of IL-6 and IL-1 is reduced in a group of women experiencing unexplained recurrent miscarriage compared with fertile women.82
INTERLEUKIN-11
IL-11 was initially described as growth factor acting at multiple stages during hematopoiesis, synergizing with other factors.83 IL-11 has important anti-inflammatory activities84 as well as pleiotropic actions in several cell types.83 IL-11 knockout mice have a fertility defect because of the postimplantation response to the implanting blastocysts55 (Table 2). Increasing evidence indicates that IL-11 has an important function in human implantation. IL-11 and its receptor (IL-11Rα) have recently been demonstrated in human endometrium. Although all the major cell types in endometrium expressed IL-11 with cyclical variation, the most prominent immunoreactivity and mRNA expression is in the decidualized stromal cells late in the menstrual cycle.85–90 There is no cyclical variation in IL-11Rα expression, and thus the expression pattern of ligand may be critical for IL-11 function in the endometrium. Furthermore, invasive trophoblast cells are a source of IL-11 and IL-11Rα during early pregnancy in primates, suggesting involvement in placentation.88 IL-11 is involved in both in vivo and in vitro decidualization.90 Upregulation of IL-11 mRNA was detected by gene array during progesterone or cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP)-induced in vitro decidualization of endometrial stromal fibro-blasts.91,92 Interestingly, recent evidence in mice shows that IL-11 signaling is required for decidual-specific maturation of natural killer (NK) cells.93 This evidence indicates that IL-11 may be important in the establishment of viable pregnancies. To date, knowledge on IL-11 function in implantation is only at an early stage. Future studies should validate and further investigate the importance of this cytokine in human implantation.
INTERLEUKIN 15
IL-15 is a 14- to 15 kDa member of the four α-helix bundle cytokine family that includes IL-2 and promotes activation of neutrophils, macrophages, and T cells, but importantly is a core chemokine that controls lymphocyte function and maintenance.94 IL-15 is essential for NK cell development in bone marrow and stimulates the proliferation, cytokine production, and cytotoxicity of activated blood NK cells. IL-15 is reported to be essential for type 2 cytokine production by the uNK cells.95 Unlike its effects on blood NK cells, it does not transform the uNK cells into potent cytolytic cells.96 This is critically important for a cell that is present at the maternal–fetal interface where cytolytic activity would destroy trophoblast. It is therefore reasonable to assume that in the human uterus, IL-15 may play a role in promoting the uNK cell survival and expansion. IL-15 mRNA and protein have been demonstrated in non-pregnant human endometrium, decidua, and placenta96 with the protein localized perivascularly in secretory phase stromal fibroblasts, in glandular epithelial cells during the proliferative phase, and in decidua in the first trimester of pregnancy.97 IL-15 knockout mice are fertile, but they display impaired decidual integrity, unmodified spiral arteries, and lack of uNK at the implantation sites98 (Table 2).
Human endometrial stromal fibroblasts decidualized using either cAMP or progesterone show enhanced IL-15 mRNA expression and protein secretion97 that is further enhanced in the presence of interferon-γ, although the latter cytokine alone cannot stimulate IL-15 production. The probable source of interferon-γ in the endometrium is the uNK cells,99 and thus the likelihood exists of enhancement of IL-15 production from decidualizing cells by adjacent uterine NK cells. IL-1β appears to play an opposing role because it acts as a negative regulator of IL-15 mRNA and protein during in vitro decidualization.
INTERLEUKIN-1
IL-1 is a proinflammatory cytokine with multiple functions in a range of tissues.100 The IL-1 system includes two ligands, IL-1α and IL-1β, the cell surface receptors, IL-1 receptor type 1 (IL-1R1) and IL-1R2, a non-binding receptor accessory protein (IL1RAcP), and the naturally occurring receptor antagonist (IL-1ra), which competes with IL-1 for receptor binding.101 All components of the IL-1 system have been examined in the human endometrium and at the maternal–trophoblast interface during implantation. IL-1 is present at the feto-maternal interphase; trophoblastic cells and decidual cells produce IL-1, and the IL-1 receptor is present in endometrial epithelial cells as well as in trophoblasts.102 IL-1 may be one of the first signals of the blastocyst acting on the endometrium because in vitro IL-1 increases endometrial secretion of prostaglandin E2, LIF, and integrin β3 subunit expression.103 Moreover, in mice, IL-1 receptor antagonist given before implantation significantly reduces the number of implanted embryos, indicating a role for IL-1 in embryo implantation.14
Growth Factors
The expression of various growth factors and their receptors in the uterus is cell specific and temporal during the preimplantation period, suggesting that some of these factors are important for the implantation process.1 Several well-known growth factors are members of the EGF, TGF-β, and VEGF families. IGFBP-I, a member of the EGF family, is also important for implantation.
EPIDERMAL GROWTH FACTOR FAMILY OF GROWTH FACTORS
Members of the EGF family of growth factors are hypothesized to participate in multiple developmental, physiological, and pathological processes. The EGF family of growth factors includes EGF itself, TGF-α, HB-EGF, amphiregulin, β-cellulin, epiregulin, and neuregulins. The EGF-like growth factors interact with receptor subtypes that belong to an ErbB gene family of tyrosine kinase receptors: ErbB1 (EGF-R), ErbB2, ErbB3, and ErbB4. They share common structural features but differ in their ligand specificity and kinase activity.5
EGF has been localized in human endometrium throughout the menstrual cycle, in gestational decidua, and in first-, second-, and third-trimester placenta. In the proliferative phase of the human endometrium, moderate EGF immunostaining is observed in the cytoplasm of stromal cells, whereas in secretory endometrium, EGF immunostaining is intense and localizes mostly to stromal cells. EGF expression is also found in both decidual and trophoblastic cells.104 Previous studies have shown that EGF plays a critical role in trophoblast invasion,105 differentiation, and proliferation106 suggesting that EGF may affect implantation in several different ways and that this growth factor is a significant regulator of the implantation process.
Studies in mice demonstrate that EGF deficiency during pregnancy causes intrauterine growth retardation or abortion.107,108 By replacing estrogen, EGF can initiate embryo implantation in the rat.48,109 Knockout of the EGF receptor (EGFR or ERBB1) gene in mice leads to preimplantation death of the embryos.110 Thereafter, several studies have demonstrated that EGF affects mouse embryo development in vitro111,112 and promotes trophoblast differentiation into the invasive type, a crucial cell type for implantation.113,114 EGF receptors are expressed in the mouse embryo at very early stages115 and also in the peri-implantation uterus.116 The spatiotemporal expression patterns of EGF gene family members and ErbBs in the uterus during the peri-implantation period suggest compartmentalized functions of EGF-like growth factors in implantation.
HEPARIN BINDING EGF-LIKE GROWTH FACTOR
HB-EGF shares a common receptor with EGF and TGFα. HB-EGF is expressed in endometrial stromal and epithelial cells and has been demonstrated to regulate endometrial cell proliferation, glandular epithelial secretion, and decidual transformation.54 The expression of HB-EGF reaches a peak level in the midsecretory phase in uterine epithelial cells, signifying that this growth factor may also be involved in the regulation of blastocyst implantation. The two soluble and transmembrane forms of HB-EGF were found to be the earliest molecular marker of local endometrial receptivity in mouse uterus, expressed exclusively in the location of active blastocysts before the attachment reaction. These data suggest paracrine and/or juxtacrine interactions with embryonic ErbBs, as well as autocrine, paracrine, and/or juxtacrine interactions with uterine ErbBs that are expressed in a spatiotemporal manner during the peri-implantation period.117 This induction is followed by the expression of β-cellulin, epiregulin, neuregulin-1, and COX-2 around the time of the attachment reaction.118 Strong expression of amphiregulin in the luminal epithelium is found only around the implanting blastocysts, and this expression is absent by day 5 of pregnancy. Mice with targeted disruptions of EGF/TGF-α/amphiregulin do not exhibit implantation defects because HB-EGF, betacellulin, epiregulin, neuregulin, and amphiregulin all show overlapping uterine expression patterns around the implanting blastocyst at the time of attachment.118,119
In humans, HB-EGF appears to play a role in implantation and embryonic development. Its expression is maximal during the period of receptivity.120,121 Martin et al showed that the soluble form of HB-EGF increases the rate of blastocyst hatching,122 and Chobotova et al reported that human endometrial epithelial cells, expressing the transmembrane form of HB-EGF, adhere to trophectoderm of human blastocyst displaying cell surface ErbB4.123 Thus HB-EGF is one of the most potent growth factors for the blastocyst and has a significant role in preimplantation embryo development and implantation in a paracrine fashion in various species.
TRANSFORMING GROWTH FACTOR BETA
The TGF-β family of growth factors contains three isoforms. TGF-β has pleiotropic effects, playing key roles in tissue morphogenesis and growth. Detection of TGF-β isoforms at the maternal–fetal interface, together with the known roles of TGF-β in the regulation of proliferation, differentiation, extracellular matrix production, and in migration, clearly implicate it in the cellular events underlying implantation.124
In human endometrium, TGF-β protein and mRNA are localized in endometrial stromal, epithelial, and decidual cells.102 Previously it has been demonstrated that TGF-β2 expression is more intense in stroma cells, whereas TGF-β1 and -β3 are equal in intensity. Only TGF-β3 expression varies during the menstrual cycle, being more intense in glandular epithelium during the late secretory phase. TGF-β1 increases ECM oncofetal fibronectin and stimulates trophoblast adhesion to the ECM; therefore, TGF-β1 is implicated in trophoblast attachment to the endometrium during the implantation.125,126 TGF-β1, -β2, and -β3 and their receptors have also been detected at the maternal–fetal interface during the first trimester of pregnancy. TGF-βs modulate maternal immunotolerance during implantation and regulate, in vitro, several implantation-related molecules, such as VEGF, MMP-9, IGFBP-1, and LIF.127 TGF-β1 knockout mouse embryos die either in the uterus or early after birth,128 suggesting a potential role in implantation. A study of TGF-β receptor types I and II and their signal transducers, Smad2 and Smad4, in rat endometrium during the estrous cycle and early pregnancy suggest that functional TGF-β signaling is spatiotemporally associated with the onset of uterine receptivity and embryo attachment, whereas it diminishes when trophoblast invasion is initiated. Alternatively, TGF-β also inhibits trophoblast proliferation and invasion by stimulating tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase (TIMP) secretion and decreasing matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) activation through downregulation of plasminogen activators.129 Elevated TGF-β activity has been reported in the plasma of preeclamptic mothers and may be implicated in the impaired implantation associated with preeclampsia.130,131 Thus TGF-β may be considered as an endometrial signal, which is able to up- or downregulate trophoblast invasion during implantation and placentation.
INSULIN-LIKE GROWTH FACTOR BINDING PROTEIN-1 AND INSULIN-LIKE GROWTH FACTOR 1
IGFBP-1 is one of six homologous proteins that specially modulate the mitogenic and metabolic effects of insulin-like growth factors IGF1 and IGF2, which have an important role in growth, apoptosis, metabolism, and development. IGFBP-1 is expressed primarily in the liver, kidney, decidualized endometrium, and luteinizing granulosa cells.102 Both IGFBP-I protein and mRNA have been localized to the predecidual stromal cells in late secretory-phase endometrium and to decidual cells during pregnancy.132,133 IGFBP-I increases the gelatinolytic activity of t3. IGFBP-1 also inhibits trophoblast migration into decidualized stromal multilayers.134 The patterns of IGFBP expression suggest that IGFBP-1 is the predominant IGFBP synthesized by decidual cells; the IGFBP-1 interacts with the IGF2 synthesized by trophoblasts. It is proposed that IGF2 and IGFBPs are used for cell-to-cell communication between trophoblasts and decidua, regulating invasion.135 IGF-II and IL-1β are inhibitory to IGFBP-1, with IL-1β inhibiting decidualization, whereas other growth factors such as TGF-β, stem cell factor (SCF), colony-stimulating factor-1 (CSF-1) and LIF have not been reported to affect IGFBP-1 expression.136
In vitro mouse embryo studies demonstrated that the addition of IGF1 to the culture medium resulted in a significant decrease in the number of apoptotic cells per embryo, mostly in cells of the ICM lineage,137 whereas supplementation with growth hormone exerted similar effects targeting the trophectodermal cells.138 A similar effect was shown in the human cells as well. Spanos et al found that the percentage of apoptotic nuclei in human blastocysts was decreased by ~50% upon addition of IGF1 to culture.139
VASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH FACTORS
VEGF is an endothelial cell-specific mitogen in vitro and is the main factor responsible for de novo blood vessel formation (vasculogenesis) and angiogenesis in a variety of in vivo models.140 VEGF (also referred to as VEGF-A) is a member of a growth factor family that includes placenta growth factor (PlGF),141 VEGF-B,142 VEGF-C,143 and VEGF-D.144 VEGF directly binds to its surface receptors VEGFR-1 (Flt-1) and VEGFR-2 (Flk-1/KDR) that are type 3 receptor tyrosine kinases.145 VEGFR-1 also binds the PlGF, a protein closely related to VEGF and expressed only in a restricted set of tissues such as the placenta.146,147 This growth factor is reviewed extensively in other articles in this issue of Seminars in Reproductive Medicine.
It is well known that implantation occurs under hypoxic conditions. VEGF (VEGF-A) gene transcription is stimulated in hypoxic conditions. VEGF is involved in embryo–endometrium interactions by regulating increased endometrial vascular permeability and endothelial cell proliferation at implantation sites in rodents.148,149 Moreover, expression of VEGF-A shows menstrual cycle dependence in human and monkey endometrium.150,151 Expression of VEGF189, an extracellular matrix-bound isoform, was found to be progesterone dependent in cynomolgus monkey152 and in the human uterus.153 The expression of VEGF mRNA and protein has been demonstrated in endometrial stomal, glandular, and endothelial cells during the mid-secretory stage in the human, although the highest level of expression is observed in the mid to late proliferative phase.154 Both VEGFR1 and VEGFR2 are present in microvessels during the midsecretory period, emphasizing a correlation between the increased microvascular density and vascular permeability observed at this time.155 Additionally, secretion of VEGF into the lumen of endometrial glands in polarized human endometrial cell cultures suggests that apically secreted VEGF may also function as an endometrial signal for blastocyst development, implantation, or both.156 Trophoblast cells and endometrial epithelium in the rhesus monkey also express VEGF during early villous stages of implantation and placentation. Moreover, mifepristone treatment during early secretory phase causes pregnancy failure, endometrial dyssynchronization, and downregulation of VEFG expression and secretion in the rhesus monkey.157,158 A recent study has shown that administration of an immunoneutralizing monoclonal VEGF antibody at 10 mg on days 5 and 10 after ovulation inhibited pregnancy establishment significantly.159 These results reveal two basic roles for VEGF in endometrial tissue: First, VEGF regulates endometrial vascularization and vascular permeability, and second, VEGF establishes a receptive endometrium to support blastocyst implantation and trophoblast invasion.
Interactions between Growth Factors and Molecular Regulator of Implantations
Integrins are a family of cell adhesion molecules intensively studied in endometrium. Heterodimers of α and β integrins serve as receptors for ECM ligands such as collagen, laminin, and fibronectin, as well as transducing signals from soluble ligands such as osteopontin.29 Some integrins such as α4 and β3 exhibit cycle-dependent changes in gene expression in both the stroma and epithelium throughout the cycle.160 In addition to the endometrium, the cytotrophoblasts also exhibit temporal and spatial regulation of integrin expression. In normal fertile women the α4 subunit is upregulated in the glandular epithelium at the time of ovulation and disappears around cycle day 24. In contrast, β3 expression in both glandular and luminal epithelium is upregulated on day 19 or 20.161,162 Because β3 upregulation and α4 downregulation coincide with the window of receptivity, this has led to the conclusion that these integrins could serve as markers of functionally receptive endometrium. At the preimplantation phase, the human blastocyst expresses several integrin subunits, including αv, α3, β1, β3, β4, and β5.163 Cyclic-specific expression of integrins appears to be regulated by ovarian hormones and growth factors. The αVβ3 integrin expression in the human endometrium is regulated both positively by EGF and HB-EGF, and negatively by estrogen.164 During the proliferative phase, estrogen inhibits integrin expression; however, in the luteal phase, progesterone reverses the effect of estrogen, thus indirectly increasing integrin expression. Progesterone also acts positively by increasing EGF, HB-EGF, and HOXA10 to induce epithelial β3 integrin expression.165 Similarly, blastocyst-derived IL-1α and -1β upregulate endometrial epithelial β3 integrin subunit expression, suggesting a paracrine mechanism for the IL-1 system in implantation.14
MMPs are key modulators of many biological processes during angiogenesis, wound healing, and cellular migration. Twenty-four members of the MMP family have been identified in humans, degrading many components of the extracellular matrix, cellular receptors, and cytokines. Tissue remodeling and angiogenesis are hallmark events during implantation and decidualization. The changing endocrine state of the female during the reproductive cycle and pregnancy results in extensive remodeling of the uterine tissue.166 MMPs and TIMPs are thought to be key mediators for matrix degradation during implantation and decidualization.119 Evidence for an in vivo role for MMP-9 in implantation comes from studies of the Ets-2- and MMP-9-null mice, as well as the TIMP-1 overexpressing mouse, and pharmacogenetic studies using chemical inhibitors. Ets-2 is a member of the Ets family of transcription factors that regulate the transcription of diverse genes, particularly MMPs. Interestingly, in trophoblasts, expression of MMP-9, which is a transcriptional target of Ets-2, is significantly decreased in the Ets-2 null mice. Thus the placental phenotype in Ets-2 deficiency may be due to insufficient MMP-9 activity in the trophoblast. In support of this model, TIMP-1 overexpressing metalloproteinase inhibitor–treated mice167 and MMP-9-null mice on some genetic backgrounds168 display a similar placental phenotype, even though these do not lead to lethality. Mechanisms regulating the MMP and TIMP genes during the peri-implantation period are not clear, although growth factors and cytokines including the EGF and TGF-β family and LIF modulate MMPs and TIMPs.169 VEFG, FGF-4, and FGF-10 stimulate MMP-9 expression in trophoblast cells.170
Transcription Factors
All genes are transcriptionally regulated. Thus all cytokines and growth factors are regulated by transcription factors. In addition to ER and PR, some of the well-characterized transcriptional regulators of implantation are described next.
HOMEOBOX GENES
The homeobox (Hox) genes encode transcription factors that guide embryological development as well as regulate differential gene expression within the endometrium with each menstrual cycle.171 Hox genes are arranged in a cluster within chromosomal loci. There are 39 Hox genes arranged in four parallel clusters (termed A, B, C, and D), which are located on four separate chromosomes. The transcription factors encoded by the Hox genes may activate or repress downstream targets, both of which define body segment identity. The DNA-binding domain of these transcription factors contains a 60 amino acid helix-turn-helix motif that is conserved evolutionarily, suggesting common ancestry as well as evolutionary conservation and genetic importance.172
Although animal species differ widely in appearance, they all use Hox genes to establish their body plans.173 There are two Hox genes (Hoxa10 and Hoxa11) that are thought essential for implantation in mice because homozygous mutants of either of these genes are infertile due to loss of endometrial receptivity. The genes Hoxa10 and Hoxa11 are expressed in the endometrial glands and stroma of the uterus throughout the menstrual cycle, and their expression levels increase dramatically during the midsecretory phase at the time of implantation, and thereafter remain elevated throughout the remainder of the cycle as well as in the decidua of pregnancy in humans.174 Taylor et al showed that ovarian hormones regulate the expression of both HOXA10 and HOXA11 in human endometrium.175 Peak HOXA10 and HOXA11 expression is first obtained at the window of endometrial receptivity. Furthermore, there is a predictable concentration-dependent response of HOX gene expression to progesterone, which increases over the physiological range. These data demonstrate that progesterone modulates the peri-implantation increase in HOX gene expression.175
This pattern of expression in the adult suggests that HOX genes play a role in human implantation, as seen in mice.174,176 The mechanisms by which the HOX genes interfere with implantation are not fully characterized, but mice homozygous for Hoxa10 deficiency show oviductal transformation of the proximal third of the uterus, defective implantation, and embryonic reabsorption in the early postimplantation period, suggesting that HOXA10 may be important during morphogenesis for proper patterning of the reproductive tract and in adult endometrium for adequate implantation events.174 In addition to its effect during embryonic development, HOXA10 is essential for normal endometrial development in each menstrual/estrus cycle. Decreased HOXA10 expression obtained with the use of siRNA leads to decreased implantation in the mouse; humans with implantation defects, including those induced by endometriosis, fibroids, and polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) have diminished HOXA10 expression. Uterine stromal cells in HOXA10-deficient female mice show reduced proliferation in response to progesterone, leading to decidualization defects.174,176 Furthermore, because several progesterone-responsive genes are dysregulated in the uterine stroma of HOXA10 mutant mice, HOXA10 may convey progesterone responsiveness in the uterine stroma by regulating gene expression. HOXA10 has been demonstrated to regulate the expression of β 3 integrin as well as several other genes involved in endometrial receptivity Similarly, HOXA11-deficient mice are infertile due to endometrial implantation defects. HOXA11 −/− mice have reduced expression of LIF.177 A gene therapy approach that involves the manipulation of the expression of Hox genes may have a role in the enhancement of endometrial receptivity and implantation.
FORKHEAD BOX O TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR
FOXO transcription factors are critical mediators of cell fate decisions in response to growth factor, hormonal, and environmental cues.178 FOXO is involved in the control of cell cycle arrest and the induction of apoptosis. FOXO1 expression is dramatically stimulated upon decidualization both in vivo and in vitro, and it is involved in regulating the expression of decidual marker genes, such as PRL and IGFBP-1. The promoters of both genes are activated by multimeric transcription factor complexes containing FOXO1, which assemble in response to the interplay of cAMP- and progesterone-dependent signals.179 A known FOXO target gene is BIM (BCL2 L11), which encodes the proapoptotic Bcl-2 homology 3 domain-only protein Bim.180,181 Bim expression increases in the endometrium before menstruation and in culture upon activation of the cAMP pathway in a FOXO1-dependent manner.182 Another FOXO target gene, Fas ligand (FASLG), has also been implicated in regulating endometrial stromal cell apoptosis.183 These findings suggest a critical role for FOXO1 in mediating the proapoptotic pathway initiated by progesterone withdrawal at the end of the menstrual cycle.
JAK/STAT INTRACELLULAR SIGNALING
The importance of the JAK/STAT signal-transduction pathway in embryo implantation has been demonstrated by the embryonic lethality of STAT3-deficient mice. Interestingly, STAT3-deficient embryos implant but die rapidly due to placental defects.184
LIF and IL-11 induce activation of the Stat family of signal transducers via the Jak/Stat pathway. In the mouse uterus, LIF acts primarily through the activation of STAT3.185 Similarly, in human endometrial stromal cells, IL-11 acts via activated STAT3.186,187 It remains to be determined when phosphorylated-STAT3 can be detected in human endometrium because this will indicate when the signal-transduction pathway is activated. Interestingly, STAT3 protein production is stimulated by progesterone188 and is activated by IL-11 in human endometrial stromal cells in vitro.187,188 Furthermore, a role for STAT3 activity in trophoblast invasiveness has also been proposed.189
CONCLUSION
Understanding coordinated interaction among growth factors, hormones, secondary signaling cascades, and transcription factors during endometrial receptivity and trophoblast adhesion and invasion will improve not only the pregnancy rate of assisted reproductive techniques but also will deepen our understanding of several other pathophysiological processes, such as tumor development, angiogenesis, and tumor metastasis. It is clear that both endometrial receptivity and blastocyst implantation are regulated by growth factors (e.g., HB-EGF, amphiregulin) and adhesion molecules (e.g., integrins, E-cadherin, laminin, fibronectin) that are necessary for embryo attachment. However, further studies are required to understand growth factor- and cytokine-mediated signaling cascades and their pathophysiological regulation during implantation. Many cytokines are expressed during the implantation window, but only a few are required for embryonic implantation, such as LIF, IL-6, and IL-11. A significant advance has been made in recent years toward understanding the molecular mechanisms governing trophoblast and ICM differentiation. Appearance of early blastocyst formation is the first morphological sign of proper differentiation. Oct-4, Nanog, Sox2, and Gata6 are involved in ICM and its subsequent differentiation to epiblast and primitive endoderm. Cdx-2, Eomes, Stra13, Hand1, and Tpbpa are involved in trophectoderm development and subsequent differentiation to trophoblastic giant cells, spongiotrophoblasts. These genes are detected through the generation of knockout mice, and further studies are required to confirm their relevance in human embryos. Studying regulation of these genes by implantation-related growth factors and cytokines and vice versa will increase our knowledge on implantation biology and may enable novel clinical approaches to implantation-related infertility.
References
- 1.Tazuke SI, Giudice LC. Growth factors and cytokines in endometrium, embryonic development, and maternal:embryonic interactions. Semin Reprod Endocrinol. 1996;14:231–245. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1016333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Carson DD, Bagchi I, Dey SK, et al. Embryo implantation. Dev Biol. 2000;223:217–237. doi: 10.1006/dbio.2000.9767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ogita H, Takai Y. Cross-talk among integrin, cadherin, and growth factor receptor: roles of nectin and nectin-like molecule. Int Rev Cytol. 2008;265:1–54. doi: 10.1016/S0074-7696(07)65001-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.O’Hayre M, Salanga CL, Handel TM, Allen SJ. Chemokines and cancer: migration, intracellular signalling and intercellular communication in the microenvironment. Biochem J. 2008;409:635–649. doi: 10.1042/BJ20071493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Dey SK, Lim H, Das SK, et al. Molecular cues to implantation. Endocr Rev. 2004;25:341–373. doi: 10.1210/er.2003-0020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Makrigiannakis A, Minas V, Kalantaridou SN, Nikas G, Chrousos GP. Hormonal and cytokine regulation of early implantation. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2006;17:178–185. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2006.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Metcalf D. Hematopoietic cytokines. Blood. 2008;111:485–491. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-03-079681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Whitman M, Melton DA. Growth factors in early embryogenesis. Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1989;5:93–117. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cb.05.110189.000521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Duc-Goiran P, Mignot TM, Bourgeois C, Ferre F. Embryo-maternal interactions at the implantation site: a delicate equilibrium. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1999;83:85–100. doi: 10.1016/s0301-2115(98)00310-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Makrigiannakis A, Minas V. Mechanisms of implantation. Reprod Biomed Online. 2007;14:102–109. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60771-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Red-Horse K, Zhou Y, Genbacev O, et al. Trophoblast differentiation during embryo implantation and formation of the maternal-fetal interface. J Clin Invest. 2004;114:744–754. doi: 10.1172/JCI22991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wilcox AJ, Weinberg CR, O’Connor JF, et al. Incidence of early loss of pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 1988;319:189–194. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198807283190401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Norwitz ER, Schust DJ, Fisher SJ. Implantation and the survival of early pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1400–1408. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra000763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Simon C, Caballero-Campo P, Garcia-Velasco JA, Pellicer A. Potential implications of chemokines in reproductive function: an attractive idea. J Reprod Immunol. 1998;38:169–193. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0378(98)00031-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Taylor E, Gomel V. The uterus and fertility. Fertil Steril. 2008;89:1–16. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.09.069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Braude P, Bolton V, Moore S. Human gene expression first occurs between the four- and eight-cell stages of preimplantation development. Nature. 1988;332:459–461. doi: 10.1038/332459a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Flach G, Johnson MH, Braude PR, Taylor RA, Bolton VN. The transition from maternal to embryonic control in the 2-cell mouse embryo. EMBO J. 1982;1:681–686. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1982.tb01230.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Richter JD. Cytoplasmic polyadenylation in development and beyond. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1999;63:446–456. doi: 10.1128/mmbr.63.2.446-456.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Yamanaka Y, Ralston A, Stephenson RO, Rossant J. Cell and molecular regulation of the mouse blastocyst. Dev Dyn. 2006;235:2301–2314. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.20844. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kodaman PH, Taylor HS. Hormonal regulation of implantation. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2004;31:745–766. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2004.08.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lunghi L, Ferretti ME, Medici S, Biondi C, Vesce F. Control of human trophoblast function. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2007;5:6. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-5-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Johnson MH, McConnell JM. Lineage allocation and cell polarity during mouse embryogenesis. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2004;15:583–597. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2004.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Takaoka K, Yamamoto M, Shiratori H, et al. The mouse embryo autonomously acquires anterior-posterior polarity at implantation. Dev Cell. 2006;10:451–459. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2006.02.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Tabin CJ. The key to left-right asymmetry. Cell. 2006;127:27–32. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.09.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Tabibzadeh S, Shea W, Lessey BA, Broome J. From endometrial receptivity to infertility. Semin Reprod Endocrinol. 1999;17:197–203. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1016227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Simmons DG, Cross JC. Determinants of trophoblast lineage and cell subtype specification in the mouse placenta. Dev Biol. 2005;284:12–24. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Strowitzki T, Germeyer A, Popovici R, von Wolff M. The human endometrium as a fertility-determining factor. Hum Reprod Update. 2006;12:617–630. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dml033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kayisli UA, Guzeloglu-Kayisli O, Arici A. Endocrine-immune interactions in human endometrium. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004;1034:50–63. doi: 10.1196/annals.1335.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Aplin JD. Embryo implantation: the molecular mechanism remains elusive. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006;13:833–839. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)61032-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Armant DR, Wang J, Liu Z. Intracellular signaling in the developing blastocyst as a consequence of the maternal-embryonic dialogue. Semin Reprod Med. 2000;18:273–287. doi: 10.1055/s-2000-12565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Tabibzadeh S, Babaknia A. The signals and molecular pathways involved in implantation, a symbiotic interaction between blastocyst and endometrium involving adhesion and tissue invasion. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:1579–1602. doi: 10.1093/humrep/10.6.1579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Sharkey AM, Smith SK. The endometrium as a cause of implantation failure. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2003;17:289–307. doi: 10.1016/s1521-6934(02)00130-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Nikas G. Endometrial receptivity: changes in cell-surface morphology. Semin Reprod Med. 2000;18:229–235. doi: 10.1055/s-2000-12561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kao LC, Tulac S, Lobo S, et al. Global gene profiling in human endometrium during the window of implantation. Endocrinology. 2002;143:2119–2138. doi: 10.1210/endo.143.6.8885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Sherwin JR, Sharkey AM, Cameo P, et al. Identification of novel genes regulated by chorionic gonadotropin in baboon endometrium during the window of implantation. Endocrinology. 2007;148:618–626. doi: 10.1210/en.2006-0832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Enders AC. Trophoblast-uterine interactions in the first days of implantation: models for the study of implantation events in the human. Semin Reprod Med. 2000;18:255–263. doi: 10.1055/s-2000-12563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Lessey BA, Palomino WA, Apparao KB, Young SL, Lininger RA. Estrogen receptor-alpha (ER-alpha) and defects in uterine receptivity in women. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2006;4(suppl 1):S9. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-4-S1-S9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Achache H, Revel A. Endometrial receptivity markers, the journey to successful embryo implantation. Hum Reprod Update. 2006;12:731–746. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dml004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Huet-Hudson YM, Dey SK. Requirement for progesterone priming and its long-term effects on implantation in the mouse. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1990;193:259–263. doi: 10.3181/00379727-193-43032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Carpenter KD, Korach KS. Potential biological functions emerging from the different estrogen receptors. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006;1092:361–373. doi: 10.1196/annals.1365.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Hewitt SC, Korach KS. Progesterone action and responses in the alphaERKO mouse. Steroids. 2000;65:551–557. doi: 10.1016/s0039-128x(00)00113-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Cooke PS, Buchanan DL, Young P, et al. Stromal estrogen receptors mediate mitogenic effects of estradiol on uterine epithelium. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94:6535–6540. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.12.6535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Curtis SW, Clark J, Myers P, Korach KS. Disruption of estrogen signaling does not prevent progesterone action in the estrogen receptor alpha knockout mouse uterus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:3646–3651. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.7.3646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Paria BC, Tan J, Lubahn DB, Dey SK, Das SK. Uterine decidual response occurs in estrogen receptor-alpha-deficient mice. Endocrinology. 1999;140:2704–2710. doi: 10.1210/endo.140.6.6825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Conneely OM, Jericevic BM. Progesterone regulation of reproductive function through functionally distinct progesterone receptor isoforms. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2002;3:201–209. doi: 10.1023/a:1020020308980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Nelson KG, Takahashi T, Bossert NL, Walmer DK, McLachlan JA. Epidermal growth factor replaces estrogen in the stimulation of female genital-tract growth and differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991;88:21–25. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.1.21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Ignar-Trowbridge DM, Nelson KG, Bidwell MC, et al. Coupling of dual signaling pathways: epidermal growth factor action involves the estrogen receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992;89:4658–4662. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.10.4658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Johnson DC, Chatterjee S. Epidermal growth factor (EGF) replaces estradiol for the initiation of embryo implantation in the hypophysectomized rat. Placenta. 1993;14:429–438. doi: 10.1016/s0143-4004(05)80463-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Perrier d’Hauterive S, Berndt S, Tsampalas M, et al. Dialogue between blastocyst hCG and endometrial LH/ hCG receptor: which role in implantation? Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2007;64:156–160. doi: 10.1159/000101740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Licht P, Russu V, Wildt L. On the role of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) in the embryo-endometrial microenvironment: implications for differentiation and implantation. Semin Reprod Med. 2001;19:37–47. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-13909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Zygmunt M, Hahn D, Munstedt K, Bischof P, Lang U. Invasion of cytotrophoblastic JEG-3 cells is stimulated by hCG in vitro. Placenta. 1998;19:587–593. doi: 10.1016/s0143-4004(98)90019-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Milwidsky A, Finci-Yeheskel Z, Yagel S, Mayer M. Gonadotropin-mediated inhibition of proteolytic enzymes produced by human trophoblast in culture. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1993;76:1101–1105. doi: 10.1210/jcem.76.5.7684389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Yagel S, Geva TE, Solomon H, et al. High levels of human chorionic gonadotropin retard first trimester trophoblast invasion in vitro by decreasing urokinase plasminogen activator and collagenase activities. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1993;77:1506–1511. doi: 10.1210/jcem.77.6.8263134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Simón C, Martin JC, Pellicer A. Paracrine regulators of implantation. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2000;14:815–826. doi: 10.1053/beog.2000.0121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Laird SM, Tuckerman EM, Li TC. Cytokine expression in the endometrium of women with implantation failure and recurrent miscarriage. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006;13:13–23. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)62011-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Duval D, Reinhardt B, Kedinger C, Boeuf H. Role of suppressors of cytokine signaling (Socs) in leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF)-dependent embryonic stem cell survival. FASEB J. 2000;14:1577–1584. doi: 10.1096/fj.14.11.1577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Arici A, Engin O, Attar E, Olive DL. Modulation of leukemia inhibitory factor gene expression and protein biosynthesis in human endometrium. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1995;80:1908–1915. doi: 10.1210/jcem.80.6.7775640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Charnock-Jones DS, Sharkey AM, Fenwick P, Smith SK. Leukaemia inhibitory factor mRNA concentration peaks in human endometrium at the time of implantation and the blastocyst contains mRNA for the receptor at this time. J Reprod Fertil. 1994;101:421–426. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.1010421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Aghajanova L, Stavreus-Evers A, Nikas Y, Hovatta O, Landgren BM. Coexpression of pinopodes and leukemia inhibitory factor, as well as its receptor, in human endometrium. Fertil Steril. 2003;79(Suppl 1):808–814. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(02)04830-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Cullinan EB, Abbondanzo SJ, Anderson PS, Pollard JW, Lessey BA, Stewart CL. Leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) and LIF receptor expression in human endometrium suggests a potential autocrine/paracrine function in regulating embryo implantation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93:3115–3120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.7.3115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Vogiagis D, Marsh MM, Fry RC, Salamonsen LA. Leukaemia inhibitory factor in human endometrium throughout the menstrual cycle. J Endocrinol. 1996;148:95–102. doi: 10.1677/joe.0.1480095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Sharkey AM, King A, Clark DE, et al. Localization of leukemia inhibitory factor and its receptor in human placenta throughout pregnancy. Biol Reprod. 1999;60:355–364. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod60.2.355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Lessey BA, Gui Y, Apparao KB, Young SL, Mulholland J. Regulated expression of heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor (HB-EGF) in the human endometrium: a potential paracrine role during implantation. Mol Reprod Dev. 2002;62:446–455. doi: 10.1002/mrd.10129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Song H, Lim H, Das SK, Paria BC, Dey SK. Dysregulation of EGF family of growth factors and COX-2 in the uterus during the preattachment and attachment reactions of the blastocyst with the luminal epithelium correlates with implantation failure in LIF-deficient mice. Mol Endocrinol. 2000;14:1147–1161. doi: 10.1210/mend.14.8.0498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Laird SM, Tuckerman EM, Dalton CF, Dunphy BC, Li TC, Zhang X. The production of leukaemia inhibitory factor by human endometrium: presence in uterine flushings and production by cells in culture. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:569–574. doi: 10.1093/humrep/12.3.569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Ledee-Bataille N, Lapree-Delage G, Taupin JL, Dubanchet S, Frydman R, Chaouat G. Concentration of leukaemia inhibitory factor (LIF) in uterine flushing fluid is highly predictive of embryo implantation. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:213–218. doi: 10.1093/humrep/17.1.213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Giess R, Tanasescu I, Steck T, Sendtner M. Leukaemia inhibitory factor gene mutations in infertile women. Mol Hum Reprod. 1999;5:581–586. doi: 10.1093/molehr/5.6.581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Steck T, Giess R, Suetterlin MW, et al. Leukaemia inhibitory factor (LIF) gene mutations in women with unexplained infertility and recurrent failure of implantation after IVF and embryo transfer. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004;112:69–73. doi: 10.1016/s0301-2115(03)00315-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Escary JL, Perreau J, Dumenil D, Ezine S, Brulet P. Leukaemia inhibitory factor is necessary for maintenance of haematopoietic stem cells and thymocyte stimulation. Nature. 1993;363:361–364. doi: 10.1038/363361a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Stewart CL, Kaspar P, Brunet LJ, et al. Blastocyst implantation depends on maternal expression of leukaemia inhibitory factor. Nature. 1992;359:76–79. doi: 10.1038/359076a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Dunglison GF, Barlow DH, Sargent IL. Leukaemia inhibitory factor significantly enhances the blastocyst formation rates of human embryos cultured in serum-free medium. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:191–196. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Nichols J, Davidson D, Taga T, Yoshida K, Chambers I, Smith A. Complementary tissue-specific expression of LIF and LIF-receptor mRNAs in early mouse embryogenesis. Mech Dev. 1996;57:123–131. doi: 10.1016/0925-4773(96)00531-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Ware CB, Horowitz MC, Renshaw BR, et al. Targeted disruption of the low-affinity leukemia inhibitory factor receptor gene causes placental, skeletal, neural and metabolic defects and results in perinatal death. Development. 1995;121:1283–1299. doi: 10.1242/dev.121.5.1283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Yoshida K, Taga T, Saito M, et al. Targeted disruption of gp130, a common signal transducer for the interleukin 6 family of cytokines, leads to myocardial and hematological disorders. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93:407–411. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.1.407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Sharkey AM, Dellow K, Blayney M, Macnamee M, Charnock-Jones S, Smith SK. Stage-specific expression of cytokine and receptor messenger ribonucleic acids in human preimplantation embryos. Biol Reprod. 1995;53:974–981. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod53.4.974. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Sherwin JR, Smith SK, Wilson A, Sharkey AM. Soluble gp130 is up-regulated in the implantation window and shows altered secretion in patients with primary unexplained infertility. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87:3953–3960. doi: 10.1210/jcem.87.8.8766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Gearing DP, Thut CJ, VandeBos T, et al. Leukemia inhibitory factor receptor is structurally related to the IL-6 signal transducer, gp130. EMBO J. 1991;10:2839–2848. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb07833.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Robertson SA, O’Connell A, Ramsey A. The effect of interleukin-6 deficiency on implantation, fetal development and parturition in mice. Proc Aust Soc Reprod Biol. 2000;31:97. [Google Scholar]
- 79.Nasu K, Matsui N, Narahara H, Tanaka Y, Miyakawa I. Effects of interferon-gamma on cytokine production by endometrial stromal cells. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:2598–2601. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.9.2598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Jauniaux E, Gulbis B, Schandene L, Collette J, Hustin J. Distribution of interleukin-6 in maternal and embryonic tissues during the first trimester. Mol Hum Reprod. 1996;2:239–243. doi: 10.1093/molehr/2.4.239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Stephanou A, Myatt L, Eis AL, Sarlis N, Jikihara H, Handwerger S. Ontogeny of the expression and regulation of interleukin-6 (IL-6) and IL-1 mRNAs by human trophoblast cells during differentiation in vitro. J Endocrinol. 1995;147:487–496. doi: 10.1677/joe.0.1470487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Jasper MJ, Tremellen KP, Robertson SA. Reduced expression of IL-6 and IL-1alpha mRNAs in secretory phase endometrium of women with recurrent miscarriage. J Reprod Immunol. 2007;73:74–84. doi: 10.1016/j.jri.2006.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Du XX, Williams DA. Interleukin-11: a multifunctional growth factor derived from the hematopoietic microenvironment. Blood. 1994;83:2023–2030. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Sands BE, Bank S, Sninsky CA, et al. Preliminary evaluation of safety and activity of recombinant human interleukin 11 in patients with active Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology. 1999;117:58–64. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(99)70550-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Cork BA, Li TC, Warren MA, Laird SM. Interleukin-11 (IL-11) in human endometrium: expression throughout the menstrual cycle and the effects of cytokines on endometrial IL-11 production in vitro. J Reprod Immunol. 2001;50:3–17. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0378(00)00089-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Dimitriadis E, Salamonsen LA, Robb L. Expression of interleukin-11 during the human menstrual cycle: coincidence with stromal cell decidualization and relationship to leukaemia inhibitory factor and prolactin. Mol Hum Reprod. 2000;6:907–914. doi: 10.1093/molehr/6.10.907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.von Rango U, Alfer J, Kertschanska S, et al. Interleukin-11 expression: its significance in eutopic and ectopic human implantation. Mol Hum Reprod. 2004;10:783–792. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gah107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Chen HF, Lin CY, Chao KH, Wu MY, Yang YS, Ho HN. Defective production of interleukin-11 by decidua and chorionic villi in human anembryonic pregnancy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87:2320–2328. doi: 10.1210/jcem.87.5.8478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Cork BA, Tuckerman EM, Li TC, Laird SM. Expression of interleukin (IL)-11 receptor by the human endometrium in vivo and effects of IL-11, IL-6 and LIF on the production of MMP and cytokines by human endometrial cells in vitro. Mol Hum Reprod. 2002;8:841–848. doi: 10.1093/molehr/8.9.841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Dimitriadis E, Robb L, Salamonsen LA. Interleukin 11 advances progesterone-induced decidualization of human endometrial stromal cells. Mol Hum Reprod. 2002;8:636–643. doi: 10.1093/molehr/8.7.636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Popovici RM, Kao LC, Giudice LC. Discovery of new inducible genes in in vitro decidualized human endometrial stromal cells using microarray technology. Endocrinology. 2000;141:3510–3513. doi: 10.1210/endo.141.9.7789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Tierney EP, Tulac S, Huang ST, Giudice LC. Activation of the protein kinase A pathway in human endometrial stromal cells reveals sequential categorical gene regulation. Physiol Genomics. 2003;16:47–66. doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00066.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Ain R, Trinh ML, Soares MJ. Interleukin-11 signaling is required for the differentiation of natural killer cells at the maternal-fetal interface. Dev Dyn. 2004;231:700–708. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.20183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Kang J, Der SD. Cytokine functions in the formative stages of a lymphocyte’s life. Curr Opin Immunol. 2004;16:180–190. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2004.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Eriksson M, Meadows SK, Wira CR, Sentman CL. Unique phenotype of human uterine NK cells and their regulation by endogenous TGF-beta. J Leukoc Biol. 2004;76:667–675. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0204090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Verma S, Hiby SE, Loke YW, King A. Human decidual natural killer cells express the receptor for and respond to the cytokine interleukin 15. Biol Reprod. 2000;62:959–968. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod62.4.959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Kitaya K, Nakayama T, Okubo T, Kuroboshi H, Fushiki S, Honjo H. Expression of macrophage inflammatory protein-1beta in human endometrium: its role in endometrial recruitment of natural killer cells. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88:1809–1814. doi: 10.1210/jc.2002-020980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Ashkar AA, Black GP, Wei Q, et al. Assessment of requirements for IL-15 and IFN regulatory factors in uterine NK cell differentiation and function during pregnancy. J Immunol. 2003;171:2937–2944. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.171.6.2937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Dunn CL, Critchley HO, Kelly RW. IL-15 regulation in human endometrial stromal cells. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87:1898–1901. doi: 10.1210/jcem.87.4.8539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Bankers-Fulbright JL, Kalli KR, McKean DJ. Interleukin-1 signal transduction. Life Sci. 1996;59:61–83. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(96)00135-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Svenson M, Hansen MB, Heegaard P, Abell K, Bendtzen K. Specific binding of interleukin 1 (IL-1) beta and IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra) to human serum. High-affinity binding of IL-1ra to soluble IL-1 receptor type I. Cytokine. 1993;5:427–435. doi: 10.1016/1043-4666(93)90032-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Bischof P, Campana A. Molecular mediators of implantation. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2000;14:801–814. doi: 10.1053/beog.2000.0120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Vigano P, Mangioni S, Pompei F, Chiodo I. Maternal-conceptus cross talk—a review. Placenta. 2003;24(Suppl B):S56–S61. doi: 10.1016/s0143-4004(03)00137-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Hofmann GE, Scott RT, Jr, Bergh PA, Deligdisch L. Immunohistochemical localization of epidermal growth factor in human endometrium, decidua, and placenta. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1991;73:882–887. doi: 10.1210/jcem-73-4-882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Bass KE, Morrish D, Roth I, et al. Human cytotrophoblast invasion is up-regulated by epidermal growth factor: evidence that paracrine factors modify this process. Dev Biol. 1994;164:550–561. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1994.1223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Li RH, Zhuang LZ. The effects of growth factors on human normal placental cytotrophoblast cell proliferation. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:830–834. doi: 10.1093/humrep/12.4.830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Kamei Y, Tsutsumi O, Kuwabara Y, Taketani Y. Intra-uterine growth retardation and fetal losses are caused by epidermal growth factor deficiency in mice. Am J Physiol. 1993;264:R597–R600. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.1993.264.3.R597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Tsutsumi O, Oka T. Epidermal growth factor deficiency during pregnancy causes abortion in mice. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987;156:241–244. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(87)90245-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Johnson DC, Banerjee S, Chatterjee S. Estradiol and chlordecone (Kepone) decrease adenosine 3′,5′-cyclic mono-phosphate concentrations in the ovariectomized immature rat uterus. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1995;210:33–38. doi: 10.3181/00379727-210-43921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Threadgill DW, Dlugosz AA, Hansen LA, et al. Targeted disruption of mouse EGF receptor: effect of genetic background on mutant phenotype. Science. 1995;269:230–234. doi: 10.1126/science.7618084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.De La Fuente R, O’Brien MJ, Eppig JJ. Epidermal growth factor enhances preimplantation developmental competence of maturing mouse oocytes. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:3060–3068. doi: 10.1093/humrep/14.12.3060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Goldman S, Gonen Y. Monoclonal antibodies against epidermal growth factor prevent outgrowth of mouse embryos in vitro. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:2231–2233. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.8.2231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Harvey MB, Leco KJ, Arcellana-Panlilio MY, Zhang X, Edwards DR, Schultz GA. Proteinase expression in early mouse embryos is regulated by leukaemia inhibitory factor and epidermal growth factor. Development. 1995;121:1005–1014. doi: 10.1242/dev.121.4.1005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Khamsi F, Armstrong DT, Zhang X. Expression of urokinase-type plasminogen activator in human preimplan-tation embryos. Mol Hum Reprod. 1996;2:273–276. doi: 10.1093/molehr/2.4.273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Wiley LM, Wu JX, Harari I, Adamson ED. Epidermal growth factor receptor mRNA and protein increase after the four-cell preimplantation stage in murine development. Dev Biol. 1992;149:247–260. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(92)90282-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Lim H, Das SK, Dey SK. erbB genes in the mouse uterus: cell-specific signaling by epidermal growth factor (EGF) family of growth factors during implantation. Dev Biol. 1998;204:97–110. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1998.9072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Surveyor GA, Gendler SJ, Pemberton L, et al. Expression and steroid hormonal control of Muc-1 in the mouse uterus. Endocrinology. 1995;136:3639–3647. doi: 10.1210/endo.136.8.7628404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Das SK, Chakraborty I, Paria BC, Wang XN, Plowman G, Dey SK. Amphiregulin is an implantation-specific and progesterone-regulated gene in the mouse uterus. Mol Endocrinol. 1995;9:691–705. doi: 10.1210/mend.9.6.8592515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Das SK, Das N, Wang J, et al. Expression of betacellulin and epiregulin genes in the mouse uterus temporally by the blastocyst solely at the site of its apposition is coincident with the “window” of implantation. Dev Biol. 1997;190:178–190. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1997.8694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Leach RE, Khalifa R, Ramirez ND, et al. Multiple roles for heparin-binding epidermal growth factor-like growth factor are suggested by its cell-specific expression during the human endometrial cycle and early placentation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84:3355–3363. doi: 10.1210/jcem.84.9.5980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Yoo HJ, Barlow DH, Mardon HJ. Temporal and spatial regulation of expression of heparin-binding epidermal growth factor-like growth factor in the human endometrium: a possible role in blastocyst implantation. Dev Genet. 1997;21:102–108. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6408(1997)21:1<102::AID-DVG12>3.0.CO;2-C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Martin KL, Barlow DH, Sargent IL. Heparin-binding epidermal growth factor significantly improves human blastocyst development and hatching in serum-free medium. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:1645–1652. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.6.1645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Chobotova K, Spyropoulou I, Carver J, et al. Heparin-binding epidermal growth factor and its receptor ErbB4 mediate implantation of the human blastocyst. Mech Dev. 2002;119:137–144. doi: 10.1016/s0925-4773(02)00342-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Tabibzadeh S, Hemmati-Brivanlou A. Lefty at the crossroads of “stemness” and differentiative events. Stem Cells. 2006;24:1998–2006. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2006-0075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Feinberg RF, Kliman HJ, Wang CL. Transforming growth factor-beta stimulates trophoblast oncofetal fibronectin synthesis in vitro: implications for trophoblast implantation in vivo. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1994;78:1241–1248. doi: 10.1210/jcem.78.5.8175984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Tamada H, McMaster MT, Flanders KC, Andrews GK, Dey SK. Cell type-specific expression of transforming growth factor-beta 1 in the mouse uterus during the periimplantation period. Mol Endocrinol. 1990;4:965–972. doi: 10.1210/mend-4-7-965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Mazella J, Tang M, Tseng L. Disparate effects of relaxin and TGFbeta1: relaxin increases, but TGFbeta1 inhibits, the relaxin receptor and the production of IGFBP-1 in human endometrial stromal/decidual cells. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:1513–1518. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Kulkarni AB, Karlsson S. Transforming growth factor-beta 1 knockout mice. A mutation in one cytokine gene causes a dramatic inflammatory disease. Am J Pathol. 1993;143:3–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Graham CH, Connelly I, MacDougall JR, Kerbel RS, Stetler-Stevenson WG, Lala PK. Resistance of malignant trophoblast cells to both the anti-proliferative and anti-invasive effects of transforming growth factor-beta. Exp Cell Res. 1994;214:93–99. doi: 10.1006/excr.1994.1237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Caniggia I, Winter J, Lye SJ, Post M. Oxygen and placental development during the first trimester: implications for the pathophysiology of pre-eclampsia. Placenta. 2000;21(suppl A):S25–S30. doi: 10.1053/plac.1999.0522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Djurovic S, Schjetlein R, Wisloff F, Haugen G, Husby H, Berg K. Plasma concentrations of Lp(a) lipoprotein and TGF-beta1 are altered in preeclampsia. Clin Genet. 1997;52:371–376. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.1997.tb04356.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Hamilton GS, Lysiak JJ, Han VK, Lala PK. Autocrine-paracrine regulation of human trophoblast invasiveness by insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-II and IGF-binding protein (IGFBP)-1. Exp Cell Res. 1998;244:147–156. doi: 10.1006/excr.1998.4195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Irving JA, Lala PK. Functional role of cell surface integrins on human trophoblast cell migration: regulation by TGF-beta, IGF-II, and IGFBP-1. Exp Cell Res. 1995;217:419–427. doi: 10.1006/excr.1995.1105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Irwin JC, de las Fuentes L, Dsupin BA, Giudice LC. Insulin-like growth factor regulation of human endometrial stromal cell function: coordinate effects on insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1, cell proliferation and prolactin secretion. Regul Pept. 1993;48(1–2):165–177. doi: 10.1016/0167-0115(93)90345-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Fowler DJ, Nicolaides KH, Miell JP. Insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 (IGFBP-1): a multifunctional role in the human female reproductive tract. Hum Reprod Update. 2000;6:495–504. doi: 10.1093/humupd/6.5.495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Han VK, Bassett N, Walton J, Challis JR. The expression of insulin-like growth factor (IGF) and IGF-binding protein (IGFBP) genes in the human placenta and membranes: evidence for IGF-IGFBP interactions at the feto-maternal interface. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1996;81(7):2680–2693. doi: 10.1210/jcem.81.7.8675597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Makarevich AV, Markkula M. Apoptosis and cell proliferation potential of bovine embryos stimulated with insulin-like growth factor I during in vitro maturation and culture. Biol Reprod. 2002;66:386–392. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod66.2.386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Kolle S, Stojkovic M, Boie G, Wolf E, Sinowatz F. Growth hormone-related effects on apoptosis, mitosis, and expression of connexin 43 in bovine in vitro maturation cumulus-oocyte complexes. Biol Reprod. 2003;68:1584–1589. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.102.010264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Spanos S, Becker DL, Winston RM, Hardy K. Anti-apoptotic action of insulin-like growth factor-I during human preimplantation embryo development. Biol Reprod. 2000;63:1413–1420. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod63.5.1413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Ferrara N. Vascular endothelial growth factor: basic science and clinical progress. Endocr Rev. 2004;25:581–611. doi: 10.1210/er.2003-0027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Maglione D, Guerriero V, Viglietto G, et al. Two alternative mRNAs coding for the angiogenic factor, placenta growth factor (PlGF), are transcribed from a single gene of chromosome 14. Oncogene. 1993;8:925–931. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Olofsson B, Korpelainen E, Pepper MS, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor B (VEGF-B) binds to VEGF receptor-1 and regulates plasminogen activator activity in endothelial cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:11709–11714. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.20.11709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Joukov V, Sorsa T, Kumar V, et al. Proteolytic processing regulates receptor specificity and activity of VEGF-C. EMBO J. 1997;16:3898–3911. doi: 10.1093/emboj/16.13.3898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Achen MG, Jeltsch M, Kukk E, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor D (VEGF-D) is a ligand for the tyrosine kinases VEGF receptor 2 (Flk1) and VEGF receptor 3 (Flt4) Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:548–553. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.2.548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Cunningham SA, Tran TM, Arrate MP, Brock TA. Characterization of vascular endothelial cell growth factor interactions with the kinase insert domain-containing receptor tyrosine kinase. A real time kinetic study. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:18421–18427. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.26.18421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Park JE, Chen HH, Winer J, Houck KA, Ferrara N. Placenta growth factor. Potentiation of vascular endothelial growth factor bioactivity, in vitro and in vivo, and high affinity binding to Flt-1 but not to Flk-1/KDR. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:25646–25654. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Vuorela P, Hatva E, Lymboussaki A, et al. Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and placenta growth factor in human placenta. Biol Reprod. 1997;56:489–494. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod56.2.489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Rabbani ML, Rogers PA. Role of vascular endothelial growth factor in endometrial vascular events before implantation in rats. Reproduction. 2001;122:85–90. doi: 10.1530/rep.0.1220085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Rockwell LC, Pillai S, Olson CE, Koos RD. Inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor/vascular permeability factor action blocks estrogen-induced uterine edema and implantation in rodents. Biol Reprod. 2002;67:1804–1810. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.102.006700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Nayak NR, Brenner RM. Vascular proliferation and vascular endothelial growth factor expression in the rhesus macaque endometrium. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87:1845–1855. doi: 10.1210/jcem.87.4.8413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Shifren JL, Tseng JF, Zaloudek CJ, et al. Ovarian steroid regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor in the human endometrium: implications for angiogenesis during the menstrual cycle and in the pathogenesis of endometriosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1996;81:3112–3118. doi: 10.1210/jcem.81.8.8768883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Greb RR, Heikinheimo O, Williams RF, Hodgen GD, Goodman AL. Vascular endothelial growth factor in primate endometrium is regulated by oestrogen-receptor and progesterone-receptor ligands in vivo. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:1280–1292. doi: 10.1093/humrep/12.6.1280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Ancelin M, Buteau-Lozano H, Meduri G, et al. A dynamic shift of VEGF isoforms with a transient and selective progesterone-induced expression of VEGF189 regulates angiogenesis and vascular permeability in human uterus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:6023–6028. doi: 10.1073/pnas.082110999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Charnock-Jones DS, Sharkey AM, Rajput-Williams J, et al. Identification and localization of alternately spliced mRNAs for vascular endothelial growth factor in human uterus and estrogen regulation in endometrial carcinoma cell lines. Biol Reprod. 1993;48:1120–1128. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod48.5.1120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Krussel JS, Casan EM, Raga F, et al. Expression of mRNA for vascular endothelial growth factor transmembraneous receptors Flt1 and KDR, and the soluble receptor sflt in cycling human endometrium. Mol Hum Reprod. 1999;5:452–458. doi: 10.1093/molehr/5.5.452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Hornung D, Lebovic DI, Shifren JL, Vigne JL, Taylor RN. Vectorial secretion of vascular endothelial growth factor by polarized human endometrial epithelial cells. Fertil Steril. 1998;69:909–915. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(98)00044-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Ghosh D, Kumar PG, Sengupta J. Effect of early luteal phase administration of mifepristone (RU486) on leukaemia inhibitory factor, transforming growth factor beta and vascular endothelial growth factor in the implantation stage endometrium of the rhesus monkey. J Endocrinol. 1998;157:115–125. doi: 10.1677/joe.0.1570115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Ghosh D, Sharkey AM, Charnock-Jones DS, et al. Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and placental growth factor (PlGF) in conceptus and endometrium during implantation in the rhesus monkey. Mol Hum Reprod. 2000;6:935–941. doi: 10.1093/molehr/6.10.935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Sengupta J, Lalitkumar PG, Najwa AR, et al. Immunoneutralization of vascular endothelial growth factor inhibits pregnancy establishment in the rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta) Reproduction. 2007;133:1199–1211. doi: 10.1530/rep.1.01228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Lessey BA, Castelbaum AJ. Integrins and implantation in the human. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2002;3:107–117. doi: 10.1023/a:1015450727580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Acosta AA, Elberger L, Borghi M, et al. Endometrial dating and determination of the window of implantation in healthy fertile women. Fertil Steril. 2000;73:788–798. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00605-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Gonzalez RR, Palomino A, Boric A, Vega M, Devoto L. A quantitative evaluation of alpha1, alpha4, alphaV and beta3 endometrial integrins of fertile and unexplained infertile women during the menstrual cycle. A flow cytometric appraisal. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:2485–2492. doi: 10.1093/humrep/14.10.2485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Aplin JD. Adhesion molecules in implantation. Rev Reprod. 1997;2:84–93. doi: 10.1530/ror.0.0020084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Somkuti SG, Yuan L, Fritz MA, Lessey BA. Epidermal growth factor and sex steroids dynamically regulate a marker of endometrial receptivity in Ishikawa cells. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1997;82:2192–2197. doi: 10.1210/jcem.82.7.4102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Lessey BA. Two pathways of progesterone action in the human endometrium: implications for implantation and contraception. Steroids. 2003;68:809–815. doi: 10.1016/j.steroids.2003.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Curry TE, Jr, Osteen KG. The matrix metalloproteinase system: changes, regulation, and impact throughout the ovarian and uterine reproductive cycle. Endocr Rev. 2003;24:428–465. doi: 10.1210/er.2002-0005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Alexander CM, Hansell EJ, Behrendtsen O, et al. Expression and function of matrix metalloproteinases and their inhibitors at the maternal-embryonic boundary during mouse embryo implantation. Development. 1996;122:1723–1736. doi: 10.1242/dev.122.6.1723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Rinkenberger JL, Cross JC, Werb Z. Molecular genetics of implantation in the mouse. Dev Genet. 1997;21:6–20. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6408(1997)21:1<6::AID-DVG2>3.0.CO;2-B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Vu TH, Werb Z. Matrix metalloproteinases: effectors of development and normal physiology. Genes Dev. 2000;14:2123–2133. doi: 10.1101/gad.815400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Anteby EY, Greenfield C, Natanson-Yaron S, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor, epidermal growth factor and fibroblast growth factor-4 and -10 stimulate trophoblast plasminogen activator system and metalloproteinase-9. Mol Hum Reprod. 2004;10:229–235. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gah031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Taylor HS, Vanden Heuvel GB, Igarashi P. A conserved Hox axis in the mouse and human female reproductive system: late establishment and persistent adult expression of the Hoxa cluster genes. Biol Reprod. 1997;57:1338–1345. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod57.6.1338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Vitiello D, Kodaman PH, Taylor HS. HOX genes in implantation. Semin Reprod Med. 2007;25:431–436. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-991040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Krumlauf R. Hox genes in vertebrate development. Cell. 1994;78:191–201. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90290-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174.Benson GV, Lim H, Paria BC, Satokata I, Dey SK, Maas SNRL. Mechanisms of reduced fertility in Hoxa-10 mutant mice: uterine homeosis and loss of maternal Hoxa-10 expression. Development. 1996;122:2687–2696. doi: 10.1242/dev.122.9.2687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Taylor HS, Arici A, Olive D, Igarashi P. HOXA10 is expressed in response to sex steroids at the time of implantation in the human endometrium. J Clin Invest. 1998;101:1379–1384. doi: 10.1172/JCI1597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176.Lim H, Ma L, Ma WG, Maas RL, Dey SK. Hoxa-10 regulates uterine stromal cell responsiveness to progesterone during implantation and decidualization in the mouse. Mol Endocrinol. 1999;13:1005–1017. doi: 10.1210/mend.13.6.0284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177.Daftary GS, Taylor HS. Molecular markers of implantation: clinical implications. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2001;13:269–274. doi: 10.1097/00001703-200106000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178.Accili D, Arden KC. FoxOs at the crossroads of cellular metabolism, differentiation, and transformation. Cell. 2004;117:421–426. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(04)00452-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179.Christian M, Zhang X, Schneider-Merck T, et al. Cyclic AMP-induced forkhead transcription factor, FKHR, cooperates with CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein beta in differentiating human endometrial stromal cells. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:20825–20832. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M201018200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180.Dijkers PF, Medema RH, Pals C, et al. Forkhead transcription factor FKHR-L1 modulates cytokine-dependent transcriptional regulation of p27(KIP1) Mol Cell Biol. 2000;20:9138–9148. doi: 10.1128/mcb.20.24.9138-9148.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181.Sunters A, Fernandez de Mattos S, Stahl M, et al. FoxO3a transcriptional regulation of Bim controls apoptosis in paclitaxel-treated breast cancer cell lines. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:49795–49805. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M309523200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182.Labied S, Kajihara T, Madureira PA, et al. Progestins regulate the expression and activity of the forkhead transcription factor FOXO1 in differentiating human endometrium. Mol Endocrinol. 2006;20(1):35–44. doi: 10.1210/me.2005-0275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183.Chatzaki E, Makrigiannakis A, Margioris AN, Kouimtzoglou E, Gravanis A. The Fas/FasL apoptotic pathway is involved in kappa-opioid-induced apoptosis of human endometrial stromal cells. Mol Hum Reprod. 2001;7:867–874. doi: 10.1093/molehr/7.9.867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184.Takeda K, Noguchi K, Shi W, et al. Targeted disruption of the mouse Stat3 gene leads to early embryonic lethality. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94:3801–3804. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.8.3801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 185.Cheng JG, Chen JR, Hernandez L, Alvord WG, Stewart CL. Dual control of LIF expression and LIF receptor function regulate Stat3 activation at the onset of uterine receptivity and embryo implantation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:8680–8685. doi: 10.1073/pnas.151180898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 186.Salamonsen LA. Crosstalk between progesterone and interleukin-11 signal transduction pathways in human endometrial stromal cells during decidualization. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2003;15:73. [Google Scholar]
- 187.Underhill-Day N, McGovern LA, Karpovich N, Mardon HJ, Barton VA, Heath JK. Functional characterization of W147A: a high-affinity interleukin-11 antagonist. Endocrinology. 2003;144:3406–3414. doi: 10.1210/en.2002-0144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188.Dimitriadis E, Robb L, Liu YX, et al. IL-11 and IL-11Ralpha immunolocalisation at primate implantation sites supports a role for IL-11 in placentation and fetal development. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2003;1:34. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-1-34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 189.Corvinus FM, Fitzgerald JS, Friedrich K, Markert UR. Evidence for a correlation between trophoblast invasiveness and STAT3 activity. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2003;50:316–321. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0897.2003.00099.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 190.Kirchhof N, Carnwath JW, Lemme E, Anastassiadis K, Schöler H, Niemann H. Expression pattern of Oct-4 in preimplantation embryos of different species. Biol Reprod. 2000;63(6):1698–1705. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod63.6.1698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 191.Avilion AA, Nicolis SK, Pevny LH, Perez L, Vivian L, Lovell-Badge R. Multipotent cell lineages in early mouse development depend on SOX2 function. Genes Dev. 2003;17(1):126–140. doi: 10.1101/gad.224503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 192.Mitsui K, Tokuzawa Y, Itoh H, et al. The homeoprotein Nanog is required for maintenance of pluripotency in mouse epiblast and ES cells. Cell. 2003;113(5):631–642. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00393-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 193.Niwa H, Toyooka Y, Shimosato D, et al. Interaction between Oct3/4 and Cdx2 determines trophectoderm differentiation. Cell. 2005;123(5):917–929. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.08.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 194.Hsieh-Li HM, Witte DP, Weinstein M, et al. Hoxa 11 structure, extensive antisense transcription, and function in male and female fertility. Development. 1995;121(5):1373–1385. doi: 10.1242/dev.121.5.1373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 195.Harris HA. Estrogen receptor-beta: recent lessons from in vivo studies. Mol Endocrinol. 2007;(1):1–13. doi: 10.1210/me.2005-0459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 196.Mulac-Jericevic B, Mullinax RA, DeMayo FJ, Lydon JP, Conneely OM. Subgroup of reproductive functions of progesterone mediated by progesterone receptor-B isoform. Science. 2000;289(5485):1751–1754. doi: 10.1126/science.289.5485.1751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 197.Mulac-Jericevic B, Lydon JP, DeMayo FJ, Conneely OM. Defective mammary gland morphogenesis in mice lacking the progesterone receptor B isoform. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100(17):9744–9749. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1732707100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 198.Lydon JP, DeMayo FJ, Funk CR, et al. Mice lacking progesterone receptor exhibit pleiotropic reproductive abnormalities. Genes Dev. 1995;9(18):2266–2278. doi: 10.1101/gad.9.18.2266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]