Skip to main content
Molecular Vision logoLink to Molecular Vision
. 2011 May 13;17:1324–1333.

Identification of differentially expressed genes in uveal melanoma using suppressive subtractive hybridization

Solange Landreville 1, Caroline B Lupien 1, Francois Vigneault 1, Manon Gaudreault 1, Mélissa Mathieu 1, Alain P Rousseau 1, Sylvain L Guérin 1, Christian Salesse 1,
PMCID: PMC3107995  PMID: 21647268

Abstract

Purpose

Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common primary cancer of the eye, resulting not only in vision loss, but also in metastatic death. This study attempts to identify changes in the patterns of gene expression that lead to malignant transformation and proliferation of normal uveal melanocytes (UVM) using the Suppressive Subtractive Hybridization (SSH) technique.

Methods

The SSH technique was used to isolate genes that are differentially expressed in the TP31 cell line derived from a primary UM compared to UVM. The expression level of selected genes was further validated by microarray, semi-quantitative RT–PCR and western blot analyses.

Results

Analysis of the subtracted libraries revealed that 37 and 36 genes were, respectively, up- and downregulated in TP31 cells compared to UVM. Differential expression of the majority of these genes was confirmed by comparing UM cells with UVM by microarray. The expression pattern of selected genes was analyzed by semi-quantitative RT–PCR and western blot, and was found to be consistent with the SSH findings.

Conclusions

We demonstrated that the SSH technique is efficient to detect differentially expressed genes in UM. The genes identified in this study represent valuable candidates for further functional analysis in UM and should be informative in studying the biology of this tumor.

Introduction

Uveal melanoma (UM) is a malignant tumor that arises from neural crest-derived melanocytes of the uveal tract of the eye [1]. It is the most prevalent primary cancer of the eye with an annual frequency of 4–7 cases per million of population in North America [1]. This ocular tumor not only has the capacity to destroy vision but can also metastasize and ultimately cause death in up to half of patients diagnosed with this type of cancer. Despite chemotherapy, the metastatic disease is fatal, usually within a few months of diagnosis [1].

Carcinogenesis occurs as an accumulation of molecular events involving disruption of cell cycle and apoptotic control, as well as increased aneuploidy leading ultimately to malignant transformation and dissemination of tumor cells. In the past decade, many details of the pathogenesis of UM have emerged, e.g., the gene-expression signatures with prognostic significance, as well as guanine nucleotide-binding proteins alpha-q and alpha 11 (GNAQ/GNA11) and BRCA1 associated protein-1 (BAP1) mutations [2-5]. Despite these discoveries, a better insight into tumor progression of UM primary tumors remains of utmost importance to identify new therapeutic targets. One way to better understand the malignant transformation of cells is to determine which genes are differentially expressed between primary tumors and normal melanocytes.

The suppressive subtractive hybridization (SSH) technique, a combination of subtraction and kinetic enrichment coupled to subsequent amplification, increases the representation of rare mRNAs, which enables to compare two different populations of mRNAs and to obtain clones of genes that are differentially expressed in the population of interest [6,7]. This technique has proven to be useful in identifying tissue-specific and less abundant transcripts as it can achieve over a 1,000 fold enrichment for differentially expressed cDNA populations [6,8]. Here, we describe the identification of 73 genes differentially expressed in primary UM using the SSH technique. Some of these genes are likely involved in malignant transformation and should be informative in studying the biology of UM.

Methods

This study followed the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by our institutional human experimentation committee. Written informed consent was obtained from the enucleated subjects.

Tissue collection and cell culture

The TP31 cell line is derived from a mixed epitheloid-spindle primary UM tumor of a 62-year-old patient that died of liver metastases (Table 1) [9]. This cell line does not have mutations in GNAQ or GNA11 and was cultured in DMEM/F12 medium (Gibco BRL, Burlington, ON) supplemented with 10% FBS (Gemini; NorthBio, Toronto, ON) under 5% CO2. Normal uveal melanocytes (UVM) were grown from human donor eyes provided by the Banque d’Yeux Nationale (CHUL, Québec, QC), according to the procedure described by Hu et al. [10]. Samples of UM primary tumors were collected at the time of enucleation (Table 1) and were either immediately stored at −80 °C in Tri-Reagent for RNA extraction (Sigma-Aldrich, Oakville, ON) or grown in tissue culture for less than 9 passages [9]. Tumors were classified according to a modification of the Callender’s classification [11].

Table 1. Clinicopathological characteristics and survival data of uveal melanoma cases.

# Age, Sex Size Last status Follow-up* (months) Pathology
TP31
62, M
Large
Dead of metastasis
42
Mixed
1
69, M
Large
Alive without metastasis
104
Mixed
2
33, M
Large
Alive without metastasis
104
Spindle
3
45, M
Medium
Alive without metastasis
81
Spindle
4
34, F
Medium
Alive without metastasis
103
Spindle
5
69, M
Small
Alive without metastasis
57
Spindle
6 46, M Large Dead of metastasis 18 Epithelioid

*Follow-up: period from enucleation until patient death or last visit.

Suppressive subtractive hybridization (SSH)

Total RNA derived from both the TP31 cell line and UVM (pool of 18 donors) was extracted with the RNeasy kit (Qiagen, Mississauga, ON) and mRNA was isolated with the Oligotex mRNA kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. cDNA was synthesized using the SMART PCR cDNA Synthesis kit (Clontech Laboratories, Mountain View, CA). Two SSH libraries were then performed between the TP31 cell line and UVM (a forward subtraction named “TP31 cell line subtracted library” and a reverse one named “UVM subtracted library”) using the PCR-Select cDNA Subtraction kit (Clontech Laboratories) according to the procedure described by Diatchenko et al. [7]. In the forward subtraction, the TP31 cell line was used as the tester and UVM as the driver (TP31 cell line subtracted library, which corresponds to upregulated genes in the TP31 cell line) whereas the UVM were used as the tester and the TP31 cell line as the driver in the reverse subtraction (UVM subtracted library, which corresponds to downregulated genes in the TP31 cell line). To evaluate the efficiency of the cDNA subtraction, the expression level of actin and endothelin receptor type B (EDNRB; Table 2) was monitored by RT–PCR in subtracted cDNA and unsubtracted cDNA. Aliquots of subtracted and unsubtracted cDNAs were removed from each reaction after 18, 23, 28, and 33 cycles and compared by agarose gel electrophoresis.

Table 2. Sequence of forward and reverse primers used for PCR amplification.

Gene Forward primer (5′-3′) Reverse primer (5′-3′) Expected PCR product size (bp)
Actin
TGTCCACCTTCCAGCAGATGT
CACTCCCAGGGAGACCAAAA
609
ANLN
CCAAGTCCTGTGTCCTCA
TGTCCCTCACAACTTTTAGCA
643
ANP32E
CGCGCTAGTGTGTGGACAAG
CGGCGCTTCATTATCCTCCT
700
CKAP5
CAGTGAGTGGTTGAAACTGCC
CTCCAGGGCCTCTTTTCTC
895
CTSK
ACCCCGGTTCTTCTGCACAT
GCCGAGGTACCCCTGTCTCA
306
DTL
CTTGGCGTCCTGAGAAATGG
TGGAAATCCACAGAAGGAGCA
614
EDNRB
CCAACATGTGGCCCAGCCTA
TGAGGTGGGGTTGGAGGAAA
231
MTAP
AGTAGCATGGCTGCCCAGGA
CCCTCCACCCTTTATTGTTGC
310
PPP3CA
AGGCAATTGATCCCAAGTTGT
GGGGTAGAGAATTTTCAAGGC
409
TSPYL5
AGATGCAAGGGAAAGGAAGCA
CTCGGACCCCATGTGTCCAT
323
TYRP1 ACCGCTGTGGCTCATCATCA TCCCCGTTGCAAAATTCCAG 603

Cloning, differential screening, sequencing and analysis of the subtracted cDNAs

The PCR products of the SSH libraries were purified (NucleoSpin Extract kit; Clontech Laboratories) and then inserted into the T/A cloning vector pGEM-T Easy (Promega, Madison, WI). Individual transformants carrying subtracted cDNA fragments were isolated from white colonies and used for differential screening (PCR-Select Differential Screening kit; Clontech Laboratories) to eliminate false positives, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. PCR fragments of the positive clones were isolated with QIAquick PCR Purification kit (Qiagen) and then sequenced using Nested PCR Primers 1 and 2R (Clontech Laboratories) with an automated DNA sequencer (ABI Prism model 3900; Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). DNA sequencing of positive clones was performed by the Plateforme de séquençage et de génotypage des génomes at Université Laval (Québec, QC). The inserted sequences were examined for similarities to human genes with the NCBI BLAST program. Poly (A)+, vector sequences, and sequences with many ambiguities were manually removed from the sequence data. A sequence was considered significant to a database entry when an aligned region was more than 95% identical over the entire cDNA length.

Microarray gene expression profiling

Gene expression profiling was performed as previously reported [12] using HumanHT-12 v3 Expression BeadChip arrays (48,804 probes; Illumina, San Diego, CA). Data were analyzed using the ArrayStar v3.0 software (DNASTAR, Madison, WI).

Semi-quantitative RT–PCR

Total RNA derived from the TP31 cell line, as well as from UVM was extracted with the RNeasy kit (Qiagen) as described above. Total RNA derived from uncultured UM primary tumors was isolated using Tri-Reagent (Sigma-Aldrich, Oakville, ON) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Reverse transcription was performed using random hexamer primers following manufacturer’s protocol for synthesis of first strand cDNA (MBI Fermentas, Burlington, ON). Primers (Table 2) were designed using the GenBank database (NCBI, Bethesda, MD). Semi-quantitative RT–PCR was performed as described previously [13] using the QuantumRNA 18S Internal standards protocol (Ambion, Austin, TX) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

SDS–PAGE and western blot

Protein extraction and SDS–PAGE/western blot were performed as described previously [14]. Proteins were separated on 10% polyacrylamide gels, transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane (Biorad, Hercules, CA) and incubated with antibodies directed against β-actin (loading control; mouse, 0.025 µg/ml; Cedarlane, Hornby, ON), anillin (ANLN; rabbit, 1.0 µg/ml; kindly provided by Dr. Peter A. Hall, Queens University, Belfast, Ireland), protein phosphatase 3 catalytic subunit alpha isoform (PPP3CA; rabbit, 1.0 µg/ml; Chemicon, Temecula, CA) and tyrosinase-related protein 1 (TYRP1; rabbit, 0.08 µg/ml; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA). The blots were visualized using the Fluor-S Max System (Biorad, Hercules, CA) after incubation with peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies.

Results

Evaluation of subtraction efficiency

Successful SSH should decrease housekeeping gene transcripts abundance and enrich tissue-specific gene transcripts [6]. A reduction of actin mRNA expression can be observed in the TP31 subtracted library compared to the unsubtracted TP31 cDNA. Indeed, the actin amplicon can be observed after 23 cycles of amplification in the subtracted library compared to 18 cycles for the unsubtracted population (Figure 1A). A similar reduction of actin mRNA expression was observed in the UVM subtracted library (Figure 1B). As a positive control for the enrichment of differentially expressed genes, EDNRB, a melanocytic lineage marker was amplified. EDNRB amplicon can be observed after 18 cycles in the UVM subtracted library compared to 33 cycles for the unsubtracted population (Figure 1C). These data demonstrate successful subtractions, with significant reduction of actin abundance and significant enrichment of EDNRB, 5 cycles corresponding roughly to a 20-fold cDNA concentration difference.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Evaluation of the subtraction efficiency by PCR using the housekeeping gene actin and the melanocyte marker EDNRB. A: Reduction of actin expression in the TP31 subtracted library compared to unsubtracted TP31 cDNA. B: Reduction of actin expression in the UVM subtracted library compared to unsubtracted UVM cDNA. C: Enrichment of EDNRB expression in the UVM subtracted library compared to unsubtracted UVM cDNA. Samples were taken after 18, 23, 28, and 33 PCR cycles.

Comparison of mRNA profiles between uveal melanoma and normal uveal melanocytes using SSH

The analysis of the TP31 cell line subtracted library (UM upregulated genes) showed that 58 positive clones corresponded to 37 genes when taking the redundancy into account (Table 3). 57% of these genes were previously associated with cancer (highlighted in bold in Table 3). The most highly represented genes in this subtracted library were anillin (ANLN) and the cytoskeleton associated protein 5 (CKAP5). Analysis of the UVM subtracted library (UM downregulated genes) showed that 54 positive clones corresponded to 36 genes when taking the redundancy into account (Table 4). Among these genes, 55% were previously found to be downregulated in cancer (highlighted in bold in Table 4). The most highly represented genes in the UVM subtracted library were actin gamma 1 (ACTG1), alpha-2-macroglobuline (A2M), cathepsin K (CTSK), and proteolipid protein 1 (PLP1). Comparison with microarray data of the previously published transcriptome of UVM [12] confirmed an upregulation of 70% of the genes identified in the TP31 cell line subtracted library and a downregulation of 81% of the genes identified in the UVM subtracted library (Table 3 and Table 4, last column). The most represented biologic processes were associated to cell division and metabolism for the upregulated genes, while they were linked to differentiation and G-protein signaling for the downregulated genes.

Table 3. Upregulated genes from the TP31 cell line subtracted library.

Gene Chromosomal location GenBank accession # Biological process Redundancy Microarray fold-change UM/UVM*
Acidic (leucine-rich) nuclear phosphoprotein 32 member E (ANP32E)
1q21.2
NM_030920
Apoptosis
1
1.59
Alkylglycerone phosphate synthase (AGPS)
2q31.2
NM_003659
Lipid metabolism
2
2.85
Anillin actin binding protein (ANLN)
7p14
NM_018685
Cell division
4
2.69
ATP synthase H+ transporting mitochondrial F0 complex subunit G (ATP5L)
11q23.3
NM_006476
ATP synthesis
1
11.20
Calumenin (CALU)
7q32.1
NM_001219
Calcium ion binding
2
1.43
Chromosome 6 open reading frame 211 (C6orf211)
6q25.1
NM_024573
Unknown
2
1.72
Chromosome 6 open reading frame 62 (C6orf62)
6p22.3
NM_030939
Unknown
1
0.43
Chromosome 7 open reading frame 64 (C7orf64)
7q21.2
NM_032120
Unknown
2
1.53
Cytoskeleton associated protein 5 (CKAP5)
11p11.2
NM_014756
Cell division
5
4.13
Denticleless homolog (DTL)
1q32
NM_016448
Protein ubiquitination
1
3.79
Family with sequence similarity 126 member B (FAM126B)
2q33.1
NM_173822
Unknown
1
1.28
Family with sequence similarity 35 member A (FAM35A)
10q23.2
NM_019054
Unknown
1
1.02
Family with sequence similarity 63 member B (FAM63B)
15q21.3
NM_001040450
Unknown
1
0.92
Glutamate-ammonia ligase (GLUL)
1q31
NM_002065
Cell proliferation
1
1.65
HEAT repeat containing 5A (HEATR5A)
14q12
NM_015473
Unknown
2
1.63
Histone deacetylase 3 (HDAC3)
5q31
NM_003883
Chromatin modification
1
3.03
Human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 binding protein 1 (TAX1BP1)
7p15
NM_006024
Apoptosis
1
2.03
Integrin alpha 6 subunit (ITGA6)
2q31.1
NM_000210
Cell adhesion
2
1.68
Interleukin 1 receptor antagonist (IL1RN)
2q14.2
NM_173842
Inflammatory response
5
1.71
KIAA2018
3q13.2
NM_001009899
Unknown
2
1.62
Melanocortin 3 receptor (MC3R)
20q13.2
NM_019888
G-protein signaling
1
1.81
Microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MITF)
3p14.2
NM_198159
Melanocyte differentiation
2
0.48
Multiple coagulation factor deficiency protein 2 (MCFD2)
2p21
NM_139279
Vesicule-mediated transport
1
1.37
MutL homolog 3 (MLH3)
14q24.3
NM_014381
DNA repair
2
1.43
Oligosaccharyltransferase complex subunit (OSTC)
4q25
NM_021227
Protein glycosylation
1
4.31
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1 (PPARGC1)
4p15.1
NM_013261
Cellular respiration
1
0.51
Pleckstrin homology domain containing family A member 8 (PLEKHA8)
7p21-p11.2
NM_032639
Protein transport
1
1.38
Potassium voltage-gated channel, Shab-related subfamily member 1 (KCNB1)
20q13.2
NM_004975
Potassium ion transport
1
1.84
Proteasome 26S subunit non-ATPase 2 (PSMD2)
3q27.1
NM_002808
Protein ubiquitination
1
1.40
Proteasome maturation protein (POMP)
13q12.3
NM_015932
Proteasome assembly
1
3.16
Protein phosphatase 3 catalytic subunit alpha isozyme (PPP3CA)
4q24
NM_000944
Protein phosphorylation
1
1.51
Required for meiotic nuclear division 5 homolog A (RMND5A)
2p11.2
NM_022780
Cell division
1
1.77
Topoisomerase (DNA) II alpha (TOP2A)
17q21-q22
NM_001067
DNA replication
1
19.52
Translocase of inner mitochondrial membrane 17 homolog A (TIMM17A)
1q32.1
NM_006335
Mitochondrial protein transport
1
1.63
Tyrosine 3-monooxygenase/tryptophan 5-monooxygenase activation protein beta polypeptide (YWHAB)
20q13.1
NM_003404
Ras signal transduction
1
4.00
Vaccinia related kinase 1 (VRK1)
14q32
NM_003384
Protein phosphorylation
2
6.53
Zinc finger, HIT-type containing 6 (ZNHIT6) 1p22.3 NM_017953 Ribosome biogenesis 1 3.89

*Considerated validated if the UM/UVM fold-change was >1.5. Genes highlighted in bold were previously shown to be upregulated in cancer.

Table 4. Downregulated genes from the UVM subtracted library.

Gene Chromosomal location GenBank accession# Biological process Redundancy Microarray fold-change UM/UVM*
Actin gamma 1 (ACTG1)
17q25.3
NM_001614
Motility
3
−86.7
A kinase (PRKA) anchor protein 12 (AKAP12)
6q25
NM_005100
G-protein signaling
1
−1.91
Alpha-2-macroglobuline (A2M)
12p13.31
NM_000014
Cytokine transport
3
−44.4
Cathepsin K (CTSK)
1q21
NM_000396
Proteolysis
3
−106.5
Chromosome 1 open reading frame 124 (C1orf124)
1q42
NM_032018
DNA repair
2
−0.62
Chromosome 18 open reading frame 32 (C18orf32)
18q21.1
NM_001035005
NF-kappaB cascade regulation
1
−2.69
Dynein cytoplasmic 1 light intermediate chain 2 (DYNC1LI2)
16q22.1
NM_006141
Endosome transport
1
−2.61
E74-like factor 1 (ets domain transcription factor) (ELF1)
13q13
NM_172373
Transcription
1
−1.83
Endothelin receptor type B (EDNRB)
13q22
NM_000115
Melanocyte differentiation
1
−38.9
Epithelial membrane protein 1 (EMP1)
12p12.3
NM_001423
Epithelial cell differentiation
1
−148.8
Formin binding protein 4 (FNBP4)
11p11.2
NM_015308
Unknown
1
−7.82
Glycoprotein (transmembrane) nmb (GPNMB)
7p15
NM_002510
Melanocyte differentiation
1
−84.5
Guanine nucleotide binding protein alpha inhibiting polypeptide 3 (GNAI3)
1p13
NM_006496
G-protein signaling
2
−0.82
Guanine nucleotide binding protein (G protein) gamma 11 (GNG11)
7q21
NM_004126
G-protein signaling
1
−6.56
Heterochromatin protein 1 binding protein 3 (HP1BP3)
1p36.12
NM_016287
Nucleosome assembly
1
−2.37
Importin 7 (IPO7)
11p15.4
NM_006391
Protein transport
2
−0.64
Junction mediating and regulatory protein p53 cofactor (JMY)
5q14.1
NM_152405
Apoptosis
1
−1.68
Leucine rich repeat containing 39 (LRRC39)
1p21.2
NM_144620
Unknown
1
−3.90
Lysophosphatidic acid receptor 6 (LPAR6)
13q14
NM_005767
G-protein signaling
2
−20.7
Methylthioadenosine phosphorylase (MTAP)
9p21
NM_002451
Polyamine metabolism
1
−2.55
Nerve growth factor receptor associated protein 1 (NGFRAP1)
Xq22.2
NM_206915
Apoptosis
1
−2.45
Potassium channel tetramerisation domain containing 18 (KCTD18)
2q33.1
NM_152387
Potassium ion transport
1
−1.33
Potassium inwardly-rectifying channel subfamily J member 13 (KCNJ13)
2q37
NM_002242
Potassium ion transport
2
−21.9
Proteolipid protein 1 (PLP1)
Xq22
NM_000533
Glial cell differentiation
4
−5.78
Rho-related BTB domain-containing protein 3 (RHOBTB3)
5q15
NM_014899
Retrograde transport
1
−2.69
Ribosomal protein S6 kinase polypeptide 1 (RPS6KC1)
1q41
NM_012424
Protein phosphorylation
1
−1.64
SLIT and NTRK-like family member 2 (SLITRK2)
Xq27.3
NM_032539
Axonogenesis
2
−2.51
SRY (sex determining region Y)-box 4 (SOX4)
6p22.3
NM_003107
Transcription
1
−1.26
Subunit of the oligosaccharyltransferase complex homolog B (STT3B)
3p23
NM_178862
Protein glycosylation
2
−1.50
Transcription elongation factor A (SII)-like 7 (TCEAL7)
Xq22.1
NM_152278
Transcription
1
−2.82
Transmembrane emp24 protein transport domain containing 7 (TMED7)
5q22.3
NM_181836
ER transport
2
−1.15
Testis-specific protein-like 1, y-encoded (TSPYL5)
8q22.1
NM_033512
Nucleosome assembly
1
−4.02
Tyrosinase-related protein 1 (TYRP1)
9p23
NM_000550
Melanocyte differentiation
1
−397
Ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2H (UBE2H)
7q32
NM_003344
Protein ubiquitination
1
−2.32
WW domain binding protein 5 (WBP5)
Xq22.2
NM_016303
Unknown
1
−2.54
Zinc finger AN1-type domain 5 (ZFAND5) 9q21 NM_006007 Development 2 0.61

*Considerated validated if the UM/UVM fold-change was <-1.5. Genes highlighted in bold were previously shown to be downregulated in cancer.

Validation of selected up- and downregulated genes by semi-quantitative RT–PCR and western blot

Semi-quantitative RT–PCR analyses were performed to compare the expression of the upregulated genes acidic nuclear phosphoprotein 32 member E (ANP32E), CKAP5, and denticleless homolog (DTL) from the TP31 cell line subtracted library (Figure 2A), as well as the downregulated genes CTSK, methylthioadenosine phosphorylase (MTAP), and testis-specific protein-like 1 y-encoded (TSPYL5) from the UVM subtracted library (Figure 2B) between the TP31 cell line, UM primary tumors, and UVM. These genes were chosen for their redundancy in the SSH libraries and/or their implication in malignant melanoma or other cancers, after microarray validation. These analyses showed identical expression patterns as those revealed by the SSH technique, indicating that the SSH data were accurate. Indeed, no band could be seen in the UVM for the upregulated genes (Figure 2A). In addition, no band could be observed in the TP31 cell line and UM primary tumors for the downregulated genes (Figure 2B). We next examined both mRNA and protein expression of ANLN and TYRP1 between TP31 cell line, UM primary tumors, and UVM (Figure 3). Neither mRNA nor protein could be detected for ANLN in UVM compared to TP31 and some primary tumors (Figure 3A). TYRP1 mRNA and protein level were greatly decreased in TP31 cell line and primary tumors compared to UVM (Figure 3B). In addition, PPP3CA mRNA or protein was not detected in UVM compared to TP31 and primary tumors (Figure 4). Moreover, we identified a new splice variant of PPP3CA in the TP31 cell line as well as in the primary tumors. This shorter amplicon was not expressed by the UVM (Figure 4A, lower band). The sequencing of this amplicon allowed the identification of a new splice variant of PPP3CA lacking exon 2 (PPP3CAΔ2). Western blots were performed to confirm the existence of a splice variant of the PPP3CA protein using an antibody raised against exon 1 to assess the expression of both the native protein and the splice variant lacking exon 2. As can be seen in Figure 4B (left panel), two protein products were detected at 51- and 59-kDa in the extracts prepared from both the TP31 cell line and a pool of UM primary tumor protein extracts, but not in UVM. When using several UM primary tumors separately, some expressed both the native PPP3CA protein and the splice variant, while others expressed only the splice variant (Figure 4B, right panel).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Validation of upregulated and downregulated genes identified in the subtracted libraries. The mRNA expression level of selected genes was measured by semi-quantitative RT–PCR in the TP31 cell line, a pool of RNA from uncultured UM primary tumors (Tumors) and UVM. A: Upregulated genes identified in the TP31 subtracted library (ANP32E, CKAP5, DTL). B: Downregulated genes identified in the UVM subtracted library (CTSK, MTAP, TSPYL5). The 18S rRNA was used as an internal control of amplification (489 bp). Data are representative of three independent experiments.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

ANLN and TYRP1 expression in UM. A: The expression level of ANLN was measured by semi-quantitative RT–PCR (left panel) and western blot (right panel) in the TP31 cell line, UM primary tumors (Tumors), and UVM. B: The expression level of TYRP1 was measured by semi-quantitative RT–PCR (left panel) and western blot (right panel) in UVM, the TP31 cell line and UM primary tumors (Tumors). The 18S rRNA was used as an internal control of amplification (489 bp). Actin was used as a protein loading control. Data are representative of three independent experiments.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

PPP3CA expression in UM. A: The expression level of PPP3CA mRNA was measured by semi-quantitative RT–PCR in the TP31 cell line, UM primary tumors (Tumors), and UVM. B: The expression level of the PPP3CA protein was measured by western blot in the TP31 cell line, UVM, and UM primary tumors (left panel: pool of protein extracts from UM primary tumors; right panel: individual UM primary tumors). A new splice variant was detected, which lacks parts of the NH2-terminal and catalytic domains after the deletion of exon 2 (PPP3CAΔ2). The 18S rRNA was used as internal control of amplification (489 bp). Actin was used as a protein loading control. Data are representative of three independent experiments.

Discussion

Only a few oncogenes involved in the development of UM primary tumors have been discovered until now. This study was undertaken to identify additional genes that could be required for malignant transformation of melanocytes by preparing subtracted libraries using normal UVM and the UM cell line TP31. The sequencing of upregulated cDNAs from the TP31 cell line subtracted library and downregulated cDNAs from the UVM subtracted library has resulted in the identification of 73 genes differentially expressed by UM.

Many genes found to be upregulated in the TP31 cell line subtracted library were previously associated with cancer, including ANLN and PPP3CA. ANLN is an actin binding protein that can associate with septins and is involved in cytokinesis [15]. Several studies have demonstrated an overexpression of ANLN in cancer such as in several of the UM tumors assayed in the present study. Indeed, Hall et al. assessed ANLN expression in several human tissue samples and cell lines by microarray analyses and demonstrated that the median level of ANLN expression was higher in tumors than in normal tissues and correlated with the metastatic potential of these tumors [16]. Moreover, ANLN overexpression was shown to increase levels of active RhoA and subsequently cell motility [16]. Therefore, given that increased genomic instability is a feature of metastatic UM tumors [1], ANLN overexpression could create defects in cytokinesis leading to binucleation and genomic instability. Calcineurin is a protein phosphatase regulating the Ca2+/calmodulin complex, formed by a catalytic A subunit (PPP3CA) and a regulatory B subunit [17]. Whereas interest was previously confined to its activity in immune response, calcineurin is now becoming recognized as a predominant participant in oncogenesis [18]. Indeed, the Ca2+/calcineurin/ nuclear factor of activated T-cells (NFAT) signaling pathway influences different aspects of tumor biology, such as stimulation of angiogenesis through upregulation of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), tumor cell proliferation through upregulation of myelocytomatosis oncogene (MYC), and tumor cell migration through cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) [18]. Native PPP3CA contains five distinct domains: the NH2-terminal, the catalytic, the B-subunit binding, the calmodulin-binding and the auto-inhibitory domains [17]. Three variants were identified previously and one splice variant showed no phosphatase activity, but was able to stimulate the phosphatase activity of the native protein, thus rendering PPP3CA more calcium-sensitive [19]. In the present study, we reported the expression of a novel PPP3CA splice variant in primary UM cells that lacks part of the NH2-terminus and catalytic domains (PPP3CAΔ2; GenBank#AY904364; Figure 4). Further biochemical analysis will be necessary to determine whether or not the catalytic activity of this new variant is altered.

Among the genes found to be downregulated in the UVM subtracted library, several were previously associated with melanoma, such as melanocytic markers TYRP1, EDNRB, MTAP, and sex determining region Y box 4 (SOX4; Table 4). Indeed, the expression of TYRP1 was inversely correlated with tumor stage in malignant melanoma [20]. A decreased expression of EDNRB was previously associated with early metastasis and short survival in UM [21]. A tissue microarray study in malignant melanoma demonstrated a significant reduction of MTAP in melanomas and metastases compared with nevi [22]. In addition, SOX4 expression was reduced in metastatic malignant melanoma compared with dysplastic nevi and primary melanoma. SOX4 downregulation was correlated with a poor prognosis and SOX4-depleted melanoma cells showed enhanced invasion and migration [23].

SSH technique was previously used in efforts to identify genes that were differentially expressed in UM [21,24,25]. One study was aiming to identify genes involved in the development of metastases [21] whereas the other studies were rather aiming to identify genes that are involved in malignant transformation of melanocytes [24,25]. Only a very small number of genes were reported by these studies as a result of the analysis of their subtracted library [21,24,25]. As a consequence, an extensive comparison between our results and their data could not be performed. Among the four genes they reported, namely the cysteine-rich protein 61 (CYR61) and tissue factor (also called coagulation factor III), EDNRB and the AXL receptor tyrosine kinase (AXL), only EDNRB was identified in our UVM subtracted library [21,24,25].

One limitation of the present study is the use of only one primary UM cell line for the preparation of the SSH libraries. However, the validation of the SSH list of genes by microarray, semi-quantitative RT–PCR and western blot with primary tumor samples compensated for the use of only the TP31 cell line as starting material. It is noteworthy that the TP31 cell line is devoided of the GNAQ/GNA11 mutations and that, consequently, the genes reported in the present study could allow to establish a new mechanism for early gene expression changes leading to malignant transformation and proliferation of uveal melanocytes. Consistent data have been obtained when comparing the SSH results with microarray data and RNA/protein extracts of primary UM tumors, suggesting that UM cell lines could represent good models for such analyses given the limited availability of primary UM tumor samples. Studying the function of these genes and their biologic pathways may lead to the development of new therapeutic options.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Dr. Dan Bergeron and Mrs. Marcelle Giasson for clinical follow-up data, and Drs. Daniel O. Black and Yvonne Molgat for the UM tumor samples. They are also grateful to the nurses Louise Monroe and Sylvie Marcoux from the Clinique des tumeurs oculaires du service d’ophtalmologie du CHUL for the recruitment of patients, as well as the Banque d’Yeux Nationale for providing human globes. The Banque d’Yeux Nationale is partly supported by the Réseau de Recherche en Santé de la Vision. The authors are indebted to the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) and the Réseau de Recherche en Santé de la Vision for their financial support. S.L. and C.B.L. were holding scholarships from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) as well as from the Fonds de la Recherche en Santé du Québec (FRSQ). F.V. and M.G. were supported by scholarships from the CIHR and the FRSQ, respectively. M.M. was supported by an Undergraduate Student Research Award from NSERC.

References

  • 1.Landreville S, Agapova OA, Harbour JW. Emerging insights into the molecular pathogenesis of uveal melanoma. Future Oncol. 2008;4:629–36. doi: 10.2217/14796694.4.5.629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Onken MD, Worley LA, Tuscan MD, Harbour JW. An accurate, clinically feasible multi-gene expression assay for predicting metastasis in uveal melanoma. J Mol Diagn. 2010;12:461–8. doi: 10.2353/jmoldx.2010.090220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Van Raamsdonk CD, Bezrookove V, Green G, Bauer J, Gaugler L, O'Brien JM, Simpson EM, Barsh GS, Bastian BC. Frequent somatic mutations of GNAQ in uveal melanoma and blue naevi. Nature. 2009;457:599–602. doi: 10.1038/nature07586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Van Raamsdonk CD, Griewank KG, Crosby MB, Garrido MC, Vemula S, Wiesner T, Obenauf AC, Wackernagel W, Green G, Bouvier N, Sozen MM, Baimukanova G, Roy R, Heguy A, Dolgalev I, Khanin R, Busam K, Speicher MR, O'Brien J, Bastian BC. Mutations in GNA11 in uveal melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:2191–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1000584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Harbour JW, Onken MD, Roberson ED, Duan S, Cao L, Worley LA, Council ML, Matatall KA, Helms C, Bowcock AM. Frequent mutation of BAP1 in metastasizing uveal melanomas. Science. 2010;330:1410–3. doi: 10.1126/science.1194472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Velculescu VE, Madden SL, Zhang L, Lash AE, Yu J, Rago C, Lal A, Wang CJ, Beaudry GA, Ciriello KM, Cook BP, Dufault MR, Ferguson AT, Gao Y, He TC, Hermeking H, Hiraldo SK, Hwang PM, Lopez MA, Luderer HF, Mathews B, Petroziello JM, Polyak K, Zawel L, Kinzler KW. Analysis of human transcriptomes. Nat Genet. 1999;23:387–8. doi: 10.1038/70487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Diatchenko L, Lau YF, Campbell AP, Chenchik A, Moqadam F, Huang B, Lukyanov S, Lukyanov K, Gurskaya N, Sverdlov ED, Siebert PD. Suppression subtractive hybridization: a method for generating differentially regulated or tissue-specific cDNA probes and libraries. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:6025–30. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.12.6025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wan JS, Sharp SJ, Poirier GM, Wagaman PC, Chambers J, Pyati J, Hom YL, Galindo JE, Huvar A, Peterson PA, Jackson MR, Erlander MG. Cloning differentially expressed mRNAs. Nat Biotechnol. 1996;14:1685–91. doi: 10.1038/nbt1296-1685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Beliveau A, Berube M, Rousseau A, Pelletier G, Guerin SL. Expression of integrin alpha5beta1 and MMPs associated with epithelioid morphology and malignancy of uveal melanoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:2363–72. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hu DN, McCormick SA, Ritch R, Pelton-Henrion K. Studies of human uveal melanocytes in vitro: isolation, purification and cultivation of human uveal melanocytes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993;34:2210–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.McLean IW, Foster WD, Zimmerman LE, Gamel JW. Modifications of Callender’s classification of uveal melanoma at the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology. Am J Ophthalmol. 1983;96:502–9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)77914-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Landreville S, Vigneault F, Bergeron M, Leclerc S, Gaudreault M, Morcos M, Mouriaux F, Salesse C, Guérin SL. Suppression of 5 gene expression is closely related to the tumorigenic properties of uveal melanoma cell lines. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res 2011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Proulx S, Landreville S, Guerin SL, Salesse C. Integrin alpha5 expression by the ARPE-19 cell line: comparison with primary RPE cultures and effect of growth medium on the alpha5 gene promoter strength. Exp Eye Res. 2004;79:157–65. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2004.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zaniolo K, Desnoyers S, Leclerc S, Guerin SL. Regulation of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1) gene expression through the post-translational modification of Sp1: a nuclear target protein of PARP-1. BMC Mol Biol. 2007;8:96. doi: 10.1186/1471-2199-8-96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Piekny AJ, Maddox AS. The myriad roles of Anillin during cytokinesis. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2010;21:881–91. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2010.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hall PA, Todd CB, Hyland PL, McDade SS, Grabsch H, Dattani M, Hillan KJ, Russell SE. The septin-binding protein anillin is overexpressed in diverse human tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11:6780–6. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-0997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Rusnak F, Mertz P. Calcineurin: form and function. Physiol Rev. 2000;80:1483–521. doi: 10.1152/physrev.2000.80.4.1483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Buchholz M, Ellenrieder V. An emerging role for Ca2+/calcineurin/NFAT signaling in cancerogenesis. Cell Cycle. 2007;6:16–9. doi: 10.4161/cc.6.1.3650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Reuter A, Mi J, Sehrsam I, Ludolph AC, Volkel H. A novel calcineurin splice variant that modifies calcineurin activity. Eur J Biochem. 2001;268:5955–60. doi: 10.1046/j.0014-2956.2001.02551.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bolander A, Agnarsdóttir M, Strömberg S, Ponten F, Hesselius P, Uhlen M, Bergqvist M. The protein expression of TRP-1 and galectin-1 in cutaneous malignant melanomas. Cancer Genomics Proteomics. 2008;5:293–300. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Smith SL, Damato BE, Scholes AG, Nunn J, Field JK, Heighway J. Decreased endothelin receptor B expression in large primary uveal melanomas is associated with early clinical metastasis and short survival. Br J Cancer. 2002;87:1308–13. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Meyer S, Wild PJ, Vogt T, Bataille F, Ehret C, Gantner S, Landthaler M, Klinkhammer-Schalke M, Hofstaedter F, Bosserhoff AK. Methylthioadenosine phosphorylase represents a predictive marker for response to adjuvant interferon therapy in patients with malignant melanoma. Exp Dermatol. 2010;19:e251–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0625.2010.01072.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Jafarnejad SM, Wani AA, Martinka M, Li G. Prognostic significance of Sox4 expression in human cutaneous melanoma and its role in cell migration and invasion. Am J Pathol. 2010;177:2741–52. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2010.100377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Walker TM, Van Ginkel PR, Gee RL, Ahmadi H, Subramanian L, Ksander BR, Meisner LF, Albert DM, Polans AS. Expression of angiogenic factors Cyr61 and tissue factor in uveal melanoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:1719–25. doi: 10.1001/archopht.120.12.1719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.van Ginkel PR, Gee RL, Shearer RL, Subramanian L, Walker TM, Albert DM, Meisner LF, Varnum BC, Polans AS. Expression of the receptor tyrosine kinase Axl promotes ocular melanoma cell survival. Cancer Res. 2004;64:128–34. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-03-0245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecular Vision are provided here courtesy of Emory University and the Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, P.R. China

RESOURCES