Thoracic injuries following trauma is an important cause of morbidity and mortality.[1] There is no doubt that urgent thoracotomy remains the access of choice in patients with shock due to life-threatening thoracic injuries. However, a majority of hemodynamically stable thoracic injuries can be managed with tube thoracostomy initially or as a definitive care.[2] It is in this group of hemodynamically stable patients that thoracoscopy or video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) has a definite role for timely assessment and treatment of intrathoracic injuries. As a minimal access procedure, it reduces the morbidity associated with a negative or non-therapeutic thoracotomy and also avoids chronic post-thoracotomy pain observed in 5 to 25% of patients.[3]
An improvement in video imaging and increasing expertise in thoracoscopy for routine thoracic surgical procedure has been observed in the last decade, which has increased its application in the setting of chest injuries among thoracic surgeons and trauma surgeons.[4] Before operation, all patients must undergo a complete imaging evaluation, including plain chest roentgenogram, a computed tomography (CT) angiography scan of the chest, and abdominal assessment with ultrasound imaging, CT scan, or both.
The procedure is performed under general anesthesia with single lung ventilation using double-lumen tube. It can be truly an endoscopic procedure using three incisions 1 to 2 cm long at the intercostals spaces known as thoracoscopy. When a 5-cm utility incision without rib spreading is used at the fourth or fifth anterolateral chest wall, it is known as video assisted thoracic surgery (VATS).
A conversion to open thoracotomy should be promptly done should the situation demand and not to be regarded as a failure. More complex cases are best managed by a team comprising of thoracic surgeons with support of heart lung machine by cardiac surgeons, respiratory physicians, physiotherapists and dedicated nurses for the best postoperative outcome.
Thoracoscopy or VATS is ideal for evacuation of residual hemothorax following tube thoracostomy, managing thoracic bleeding in stable patients, prevention and treatment of empyema, assessment and repair of persistent air leak, diagnosis and repair of diaphragmatic injuries and also removal of foreign bodies such as glass or metal fragments.[5,6]
Following chest trauma, retained hemothorax which can occur in up to 18% of patients initially treated with tube thoracostomy is among the commonest complications and can significantly increase the morbidity and hospital costs.[7] Several authors have cited 500 ml of retained blood clot as a threshold for operative intervention which should be done as early as possible from the 2nd to 10th day of tube drainage.[8,9] This avoids complication such as fibrothorax, lung entrapment or empyema arising due to undrained intrapleural clot.
In patients who are hemodynamically stable but continue to bleed from the thoracostomy tube, a carefully performed thoracoscopy, gives valuable information about parietal or pulmonary bleeding and managed accordingly.
A persistent air-leak or bronchopleural fistula following trauma should be managed early using thoracoscopy, before pleural adhesions sets in limiting utility of thoracoscopy.[10]
In suspected injuries of the mediastinum with the availability of high-resolution CT scan, thoracoscopy is infrequently used for a diagnosis. However, when such facility is not available, thoracoscopy can be both diagnostic and therapeutic to visualize the integrity of the trachea, esophagus and pericardium.[11]
For suspected diaphragmatic injuries, thoracoscopy is both diagnostic and therapeutic by visualizing the diaphragm including the posterior recesses, an area not often seen well with the laparoscope.[12]
Thoracoscopy can also be used for retrieval of foreign bodies within the thorax, such as glass fragments avoiding a thoracotomy.[13] This issue of Lung India contains an article on retrieval of foreign body using VATS.[14]
In the modern era of trauma management, it can be concluded that thoracoscopy for chest trauma should be considered an essential tool and not a luxury for thoracic or trauma surgeons.
REFERENCES
- 1.Bellamy RF. History of surgery for penetrating chest trauma. Chest Surg Clin N Am. 2000;10:55–70. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Pickard LR, Mattox KL. Thoracic trauma and indications for thoracotomy. In: Mattox KL, Moore EE, Feliciano DV, editors. Trauma. Norwalk: Appleton and Lange; 1980. pp. 315–20. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hazelrigg SR, Cetindag IB, Fullerton J. Acute and chronic pain syndromes after thoracic surgery. Surg Clin North Am. 2002;82:849–65. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6109(02)00031-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Milanchi S, Makey I, McKenna R, Margulies DR. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in the management of penetrating and blunt thoracic trauma. J Minim Access Surg. 2009;5:63–6. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.58499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ivatury RR. Thoracoscopy for trauma. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2010;36:15–8. doi: 10.1007/s00068-010-9214-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bartek JP, Grasch A, Hazelrigg SR. Thoracoscopic retrieval of foreign bodies after penetrating chest trauma. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997;63:1783–5. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(97)83864-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Morrison CA, Lee TC, Wall MJ, Jr, Carrick MM. Use of a Trauma Service Clinical Pathway to Improve Patient Outcomes for Retained Traumatic Hemothorax. World J Surg. 2009;33:1851–6. doi: 10.1007/s00268-009-0141-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Velhamos GC, Demetriated D, Chan L, Tatevossian R, Cornwell EE, 3rd, Yassa N, et al. Predicting the need for thoracoscopic evacuation of residual traumatic hemothorax: chest radiograph is insufficient. J Trauma. 1999;46:65–70. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199901000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Morales Uribe CH, Villegas Lanau MI, Petro Sánchez RD. Best timing for thoracoscopic evacuation of retained post-traumatic hemothorax. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:91–5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9378-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Schermer CR, Matteson BD, Demarest GB, Albrecht RM, Davis VH. A prospective evaluation of video-assisted thoracic surgery for persistent air leak due to trauma. Am J Surg. 1999;177:480–4. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(99)00100-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Pons F, Lang-Lazdunski L, de Kerangal X, Chapuis O, Bonnet PM, Jancovici R. The role of videothoracoscopy in management of precordial thoracic penetrating injuries. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2002;22:7–12. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(02)00248-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Freeman RK, Al-Dossari G, Hutcheson KA, Huber L, Jessen ME, Meyer DM, et al. Indications for using video assisted thoracoscopic surgery to diagnose diaphragmatic injuries after penetrating chest trauma. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;72:342–7. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(01)02803-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bartek JP, Grasch A, Hazelrigg SR. Thoracoscopic retrieval of foreign bodies after penetrating chest trauma. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997;63:1783–5. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(97)83864-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Radjou AN, Uthrapathy M. Video-assisted thoracoscopy in trauma: Case report and review of literature. Lung India. 2011;28:142–44. doi: 10.4103/0970-2113.80335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]