Skip to main content
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases logoLink to PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
. 2011 Jun 7;5(6):e1185. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001185

A Cross-Sectional Study of People with Epilepsy and Neurocysticercosis in Tanzania: Clinical Characteristics and Diagnostic Approaches

Joachim Blocher 1,2,3,*, Erich Schmutzhard 1, Patricia P Wilkins 4, Paige N Gupton 4, Matthias Schaffert 1,2, Herbert Auer 5, Thaddaeus Gotwald 6, William Matuja 7, Andrea S Winkler 2,8
Editor: Ana Flisser9
PMCID: PMC3110162  PMID: 21666796

Abstract

Neurocysticercosis (NCC) is a major cause of epilepsy in regions where pigs are free-ranging and hygiene is poor. Pork production is expected to increase in the next decade in sub-Saharan Africa, hence NCC will likely become more prevalent. In this study, people with epilepsy (PWE, n = 212) were followed up 28.6 months after diagnosis of epilepsy. CT scans were performed, and serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of selected PWE were analysed. We compared the demographic data, clinical characteristics, and associated risk factors of PWE with and without NCC. PWE with NCC (n = 35) were more likely to be older at first seizure (24.3 vs. 16.3 years, p = 0.097), consumed more pork (97.1% vs. 73.6%, p = 0.001), and were more often a member of the Iraqw tribe (94.3% vs. 67.8%, p = 0.005) than PWE without NCC (n = 177). PWE and NCC who were compliant with anti-epileptic medications had a significantly higher reduction of seizures (98.6% vs. 89.2%, p = 0.046). Other characteristics such as gender, seizure frequency, compliance, past medical history, close contact with pigs, use of latrines and family history of seizures did not differ significantly between the two groups. The number of NCC lesions and active NCC lesions were significantly associated with a positive antibody result. The electroimmunotransfer blot, developed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, was more sensitive than a commercial western blot, especially in PWE and cerebral calcifications. This is the first study to systematically compare the clinical characteristics of PWE due to NCC or other causes and to explore the utility of two different antibody tests for diagnosis of NCC in sub-Saharan Africa.

Author Summary

Neurocysticercosis, a preventable and treatable disease, is one of the main causes of epilepsy in low income countries. In these countries, the diagnosis of epilepsy is often based on clinical presentation and interviews as neuroimaging is rarely available. It is crucial to distinguish people with epilepsy due to neurocysticercosis from other people with epilepsy by clinical symptoms and/or serology, because the former warrants a specific approach both in terms of diagnosis and treatment. The authors compared the demographic and clinical data of the two groups and found that people with epilepsy due to neurocysticercosis are older, more likely to consume pork, and respond better to anti-epileptic treatment. Additionally, the authors compared two antibody tests for cysticercosis with computed tomography images, which showed a higher sensitivity of the CDC electroimmunotransfer blot compared to a commercial western blot. The number of neurocysticercosis lesions was significantly associated with a positive antibody result in both tests. In summary, this research describes clinical characteristics of people with epilepsy and neurocysticercosis and assesses the usefulness of two immunoblots in those patients. This has implications not only for the diagnosis of neurocysticercosis in low income countries, but also for future epidemiological research.

Introduction

Epilepsy in Low Income Countries

Epilepsy is one of the most common neurological disorders worldwide. More than 80% of people with epilepsy (PWE) live in low income countries [1] and more than 75% of them are not treated sufficiently [2]. The prevalence of epilepsy is two to ten times higher and the incidence rate twice that of high income countries [3]. In northern Tanzania, where our study took place, recent results indicate a prevalence of 11.2 per 1000 [4]. One important step towards reducing the burden of epilepsy is to assess its prevalence, causes and risk factors in resource poor countries.

Cysticercosis

According to the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE), neurocysticercosis (NCC) is a growing problem in tropical countries and increasingly recognized as a leading cause of epilepsy [5][8]. A recent meta-analysis including only studies from Africa revealed a highly significant association between cysticercosis and epilepsy, suggesting that NCC is a major cause of epilepsy in Africa [9]. In endemic countries, NCC is the cause of epilepsy in more than a quarter of PWE [10]. Worldwide, NCC is the most common parasitic disease of the nervous system [1]. Cysticercosis occurs when humans become infected with Taenia solium eggs and develop the larval stage. Typical clinical manifestations of NCC are epileptic seizures, which are caused by the cysticerci themselves and by the host's immune response [11].

Pig farming has increased considerably in East and South Africa, especially in rural, low income, smallholder communities [12]. Thus cysticercosis may represent a growing problem, especially in rural areas like our study area, where proper meat inspection does not exist and lack of health education and hygiene is common [11]. The costs of cysticercosis are considerable. Carabin et al. calculated a loss of 34.2 million US-Dollars caused by cysticercosis for the Eastern Cape Province in South Africa with 7 million inhabitants in 2004 [13].

Diagnostic accuracy is the key to identify people with NCC and to treat them according to established guidelines. In most low income countries where NCC is rampant, neuroimaging is not readily available. Diagnosis is established based on medical history, physical examination and, if present, laboratory testing. In our study, we present clinical details of PWE with and without NCC, results of neuroimaging and of two different antibody tests for cysticercosis in an area of northern Tanzania, which only recently has been shown to be highly endemic for cysticercosis [14], [15].

Methods

Ethical Considerations

The project was ethically cleared by The National Institute for Medical Research (NIMR), Tanzania. Patients were informed about the risks and benefits of participating in the study, computed tomography (CT) examination and necessary treatments. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. Patients received free anti-epileptic and, if necessary, anthelmintic treatment according to national guidelines during and after the study. The shipment of samples to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, in Atlanta, GA (CDC), was in accordance with institutional review boards and material transfer agreements between Haydom Lutheran Hospital (HLH), CDC, NIMR and the Medical University Innsbruck.

Study Site

The study was conducted at HLH, which is situated in a remote rural area of northern Tanzania. The total immediate catchment area of the hospital comprises 316,168 people [16]. In 2002, one of the authors (ASW) established a clinic for PWE at HLH, which nowadays cares for more than 400 PWE. The implementation of CT scanning in 2005 further improved diagnostic capacity for people with epileptic seizures/epilepsy. The main tribes in the study area are Iraqw, Datoga and Bantu tribes. The Iraqw and Bantu are agro-pastoralists, while the Datoga traditionally have been nomadic pastoralists, though many are now less nomadic and more agricultural.

Recruitment of People with Epilepsy

In a former project between August 2002 and October 2004, our research group identified and characterised 346 people with epileptic seizures [17]. Demographic and clinical characteristics, psychosocial as well as sociocultural aspects and the pattern of injuries were evaluated. Epilepsy was defined as two or more afebrile seizures unrelated to acute metabolic disorders or to withdrawal of drugs or alcohol [18] and grouped according to a classification developed for resource poor countries [19], which is based on the ILAE classification for epileptic seizures [20]. The diagnosis was based on seizure semiology, past and present medical history, other associated risk factors and physical examination only. Imaging or EEG was not available at time of diagnosis of epilepsy. Of these 346 people with epileptic seizures 212 participated in the CT study. Due to ethical reasons children younger than ten years at time of diagnosis of epilepsy and pregnant women were excluded. For more details on inclusion and exclusion criteria see Figure 1.

Figure 1. Flow chart for the recruitment of patients.

Figure 1

For more details see Methods.

Study Protocol

All participating PWE were interviewed by a doctor in training and two local nurses using a follow up protocol, which had been validated in a previous study [17]. Additional questions related to NCC were added. Compliance with treatment was assessed by checking regular attendance at HLH and, if attending regularly, calculating the number of tablets that should have remained since the last appointment and counter-checking it with the actual number of tablets.

Neuroimaging and Serodiagnosis

All 212 PWE underwent CT examination. The CT machine was a Toshiba Auklet Single Slice Spiral CT. The thickness of slices was 5 mm in the posterior cranial fossa and 10 mm for the rest. Intravenous contrast medium was applied in all patients. The pictures were saved digitally and sent to Innsbruck, where a neuroradiologist reviewed all scans. A detailed description of the results on neuroimaging has recently been published [15].

CT based diagnosis of NCC was divided into three groups: definite NCC lesions, lesions highly suggestive of, and those compatible with NCC. Definite NCC lesions were cystic lesions showing the scolex. Any cystic lesion without a visible scolex, single or multiple ring or nodular enhancing lesions and parenchymal brain calcifications were categorized as lesions highly suggestive of NCC [21], [22]. Any pathology that might be caused by NCC such as hydrocephalus or enhancement of the leptomeninges was considered compatible [21], [22], single calcifications in parenchymal brain were also considered compatible. Active NCC was defined as any cystic lesions or lesions with ring enhancement. Parenchymal calcifications were classified as inactive [23], [24].

Due to financial restrictions only part of the collected serum samples (20 of PWE with either highly suggestive or definite NCC lesions and 20 of PWE without NCC lesions on CT scan) and all 11 CSF samples of PWE with highly suggestive or definite NCC lesions on CT scan were analysed with a commercially available western blot (CWB) for cysticercosis (LDBio, Lyon, France) [25][27] at the Department for Medical Parasitology, Institute of Specific Prophylaxis and Tropical Medicine, Medical University Vienna, Austria. The antigen used in this test was prepared from T. solium larvae (cysticerci). At a later stage of the project all collected serum samples (28 of PWE with either highly suggestive or definite NCC lesions, 7 of PWE with compatible NCC lesions and 46 of PWE without NCC lesions on CT scan) and CSF samples (11 CSF samples of PWE with highly suggestive or definite NCC lesions on CT scan) were tested at the CDC using the CDC-developed enzyme-linked electroimmunotransfer blot (CDC EITB). The CDC EITB was performed as described previously [28].

Diagnostic Criteria of Neurocysticercosis

The criteria proposed by Del Brutto et al. were used for diagnosis of clinical NCC. A set of defined absolute, major and minor criteria, based on clinical signs and symptoms, neuroimaging, detection of antibodies and epidemiological considerations, were used to establish degrees of certainty for diagnosis, which are classified as definitive and probable NCC [21], [22]. In our study, we compared PWE with definitive or probable NCC to those without NCC. A positive serological result in both tests (CWB and CDC EITB) was only considered once as a criterion for the diagnosis of NCC.

Statistical Analysis

All data were entered in a SPSS-database. Statistical analysis was performed with the same program. Since all numeric variables had a non-parametric distribution, differences between PWE with and without NCC were tested for significance with Mann-Whitney-U test. Categorical data were tested with Fisher's exact test. McNemar's test was applied to data from samples that were analysed with both antibody tests in order to find significant differences. A p-value lower than 0.05 was regarded as significant. Insufficient answers were left as missing data in the database and were excluded from statistical analysis. Hence the number of people within a specific category might differ from the total number of examined PWE (n = 212).

The reduction of seizure frequency was calculated by dividing the seizure frequency after treatment in 2006 by the seizure frequency before treatment. People with no seizures in 2006 had a reduction of 100 percent. People with an increased number of seizures had zero percent reduction.

Results

Demographic Details

The median duration of epilepsy from the day of diagnosis until the day of the follow up for this study was 28.6 months. The range was between 19.3 and 47.7 months. In our cohort of 212 PWE, 35 (16.5%) satisfied the diagnostic criteria for either probable or definitive NCC. The main demographic findings are shown in Table 1.

Table 1. Demographic data, clinical characteristics and associated factors of people with epilepsy with and without neurocysticercosis.

Characteristics PWE with NCC PWE without NCC Total
Age at examination day in years N 35 177 212
p = 0.530 Mean (SD) 32.5 (20.6) 27.3 (12.7) 28.2 (14.4)
Median (range) 22 (13–83) 24 (11–72) 24 (11–83)
Age at first seizure in years N 35 176 211
p = 0.097 Mean (SD) 24.3 (22.0) 16.3 (12.2) 17.7 (14.5)
Median (range) 17 (0.1–77) 14 (0.3–64) 14 (0.1–77)
Gender Male N (%) 21 (60.0) 87 (49.2) 108 (50.9)
p = 0.270 Female N (%) 14 (40.0) 90 (50.8) 104 (49.1)
Tribe Iraqw N (%) 33 (94.3) 120 (67.8) 153 (72.2)
p = 0.005 Datoga N (%) 2 (5.7) 27 (15.3) 29 (13.7)
Bantu tribes N (%) 0 (0.0) 28 (15.8) 28 (13.2)
Other N (%) 0 (0.0) 2 (1.1) 2 (0.9)
Educational level None N (%) 14 (40.0) 53 (30.1) 67 (31.8)
p = 0.734 Less than 7 years N (%) 9 (25.7) 49 (27.8) 58 (27.5)
Primary school (7 years) N (%) 12 (34.3) 68 (38.6) 80 (37.9)
7–11 years N (%) 0 (0.0) 1 (0.6) 1 (0.5)
Secondary school (11 years) N (%) 0 (0.0) 5 (2.8) 5 (2.4)
Type of seizure1) Gwa N (%) 15 (42.9) 100 (56.5) 115 (54.2)
p = 0.461 Gfs N (%) 7 (20.0) 33 (18.6) 40 (18.9)
Goa N (%) 8 (22.9) 22 (12.4) 30 (14.2)
Gbd N (%) 2 (5.7) 11(6.2) 13 (6.1)
Tt N (%) 3 (8.6) 9 (5.1) 12 (5.7)
U N (%) 0 (0.0) 2 (1.1) 2 (0.9)
Frequency of seizures / month before Tx N 26 153 179
p = 0.461 Mean (SD) 6.8 (14.1) 7.8 (19.3) 7.7 (18.6)
Median (range) 2.75 (0.1–70) 3 (0.1–180) 3 (0.1–180)
Frequency of seizures / month after Tx in 2006 N 35 175 210
p = 0.093 Mean (SD) 0.4 (0.8) 0.8 (2.6) 0.8 (2.4)
Median (range) 0 (0–3) 0.2 (0–29.5) 0.2 (0–29.5)
Compliance with Tx Compliant N (%) 14 (42.4) 95 (53.7) 109 (51.9)
p = 0.259 Non-compliant N (%) 19 (57.6) 82 (46.3) 101 (48.1)
Reduction of seizure frequency in 2006 in percent N 32 169 201
All PWE Mean (SD) 90.2 (21.9) 81.6 (29.5) 82.9 (28.5)
p = 0.081 Median (range) 100 (0–100) 97.8 (0–100) 99.6 (0–100)
Reduction of seizure frequency in 2006 in percent N 16 80 96
Non compliant Mean (SD) 82.2 (29.0) 73.0 (34.1) 74.6 (33.3)
p = 0.362 Median (range) 96.5 (0–100) 87.0 (0–100) 89.3 (0–100)
Reduction of seizure frequency in 2006 in percent N 14 89 103
All Compliant: Mean (SD) 98.6 (3.6) 89.2 (22.1) 90.5 (20.8)
p = 0.046 Median (range) 100 (89–100) 100 (0–100) 100 (0–100)
Reduction of seizure frequency in 2006 in percent N 9 65 74
Compliant on Carbamazepine Mean (SD) 99.0 (2.8) 89.2 (21.7) 90.4 (20.6)
p = 0.069 Median (range) 100 (92–100) 98.8 (0–100) 100 (0–100)
Reduction of seizure frequency in 2006 in percent N 5 21 26
Compliant on Phenobarbitone Mean (SD) 97.8 (5.0) 87.9 (24.7) 89.8 (22.5)
p = 0.294 Median (range) 100 (89–100) 100 (0–100) 100 (0–100)
Family history of seizures n = 212; p = 0.688 N (%) 11 (31.4) 50 (28.2) 61 (28.8)
PPH of depression n = 211; p = 0.224 N (%) 0 (0.0) 12 (6.8) 12 (5.7)
PPH of psychotic episodes n = 212; p = 1.000 N (%) 1 (2.9) 5 (2.8) 6 (2.8)
PPH of mental retardation n = 212; p = 1.000 N (%) 4 (11.4) 23 (13.0) 27 (12.7)
1)

Gwa...Generalised seizures that started within a specific age range (seizures most likely due to idiopathic epilepsy), Gfs...Generalised seizures with obvious focal neurological signs, Goa...Generalised seizures that started outside the age range of idiopathic epilepsies but without any obvious sign or history of an underlying cause, Gbd...Generalised seizures with more widespread brain damage, Tt...Two different seizure types, U...Unclassified epileptic seizures; for more details see Winkler et al. [19] PWE... People with epilepsy, NCC... Neurocysticercosis, Tx... Anti-epileptic treatment, PPH... Past psychiatric history.

People with active NCC lesions (n = 6) with an average age of 47.7 years (SD 23.4) were significantly older than people with inactive NCC (n = 25) with an average age of 25.2 years ((SD 15.5); Mann-Whitney-U, p = 0.015). Also, the mean age of PWE with active NCC at first seizure (41.2 years (SD 23.0)) was significantly higher when compared to PWE with inactive NCC (16.8 years (SD 16.5); Mann-Whitney-U, p = 0.007).

Clinical Characteristics

The seizure frequencies, compliance with anti-epileptic drug (AED) and reduction of seizure frequency after treatment in PWE with and without NCC are listed in Table 1. There was a trend towards generalised epilepsies without focal neurological signs that started outside the age range of idiopathic epilepsies (implying that there may be structural brain damage) and generalised epilepsies with clear focal signs being commoner in the NCC group. On the other hand, idiopathic epilepsies, which are usually generalised seizures starting within a specific age range, and epilepsies associated with brain damage were more frequent in PWE without NCC.

The compliance with AED was slightly better in the group without NCC, although this did not reach significance. The administration of the type of AED was similar in both groups. Among compliant PWE taking their AED regularly, the group of PWE with NCC had a significantly higher reduction of seizures (Table 1). The percentage of people without seizures since their last visit was higher among compliant PWE (compliant: 54.1%, 59/109; non-compliant: 40.6%, 41/101; Fisher's exact test p = 0.054). Dividing compliant and non-compliant PWE according to the presence of NCC a higher percentage of people without seizures was observed among compliant PWE with NCC compared to those without NCC (compliant: 78.6%, 11/14 PWE with NCC, 50.5%, 48/95 PWE without NCC, Fisher's exact test p = 0.082; non-compliant: 42.1%, 8/19 PWE with NCC, 40.2%, 33/82 PWE without NCC, p = 1.000), although the result did not reach significance. In terms of past psychiatric history, family history of seizures and educational level no significant differences were found. For more details see Table 1.

Risk Factors Associated with Neurocysticercosis

Number of people in household as an indicator of crowding, number of pigs at home, close contact with pigs and use of latrines as possible risk factors for NCC were not significantly associated with NCC. However, the percentage of people who consumed pork was significantly higher in the group of people with NCC (Table 2).

Table 2. Frequency of potential risk factors of neurocysticercosis in people with epilepsy with and without neurocysticercosis.

Potential risk factors of NCC PWE with NCC PWE without NCC Total
Number of people in household N 35 174 209
p = 0.856 Mean (SD) 6.9 (3.0) 7.4 (4.2) 7.3 (4.0)
Median (range) 6 (2–13) 7 (1–30) 7 (1–30)
Number of pigs in household N 35 174 209
p = 0.370 Mean (SD) 1.3 (2.0) 1.1 (2.0) 1.1 (2.0)
Median (range) 0 (0–10) 0 (0–10) 0 (0–10)
Close contact with pigs n = 212; p = 0.351 N (%) 17 (48.6) 70 (39.5) 87 (41.0)
Pork consumption n = 209; p = 0.001 N (%) 34 (97.1) 128 (73.6) 162 (77.5)
Use of latrine n = 209; p = 1.000 N (%) 34 (97.1) 169 (97.1) 203 (97.1)

PWE... People with epilepsy, NCC... Neurocysticercosis.

Serological Analysis of Serum Samples

All samples which were positive using the CWB were also positive using the CDC EITB. Additionally, seven samples that were negative in the CWB were positive in the CDC EITB, which was statistically significant (McNemar, p = 0.016). Five of these seven had multiple calcified lesions highly suggestive of NCC, one had multiple calcified lesions and one hypodense lesion and one had a normal CT. The percentage of a positive CDC EITB result in the group of PWE with NCC calcifications ( = highly suggestive of NCC) was much higher (52.2%, 12/23) than the percentage of the same group tested with the CWB (13.3%, 2/15; “sensitivity”, if CT was used as a gold standard). Even with the small number of samples that was analysed in both labs (n = 15), this approached significance (negative in both tests: 8, positive in both tests: 2, CWB negative, CDC EITB positive: 5; McNemar, p = 0.063). Concerning people with a normal CT, all samples (20/20) were negative with the CWB, whereas 91.3% (42/46) were negative with the CDC EITB (“specificity”, if CT was used as gold standard). The results of CSF samples were identical in CWB and CDC EITB.

Diagnosis of Neurocysticercosis

Using the results of the CDC EITB as the serological gold standard, as suggested by Del Brutto et al. [21], [22], 17 people were classified with definitive NCC, versus 7, if the data obtained from the CWB had been used (Table 3). Similarly, the percentage of PWE with probable and definitive NCC was 16.5% (35/212) using the CDC EITB results, compared to 13.7% (29/212) if the CWB was used.

Table 3. Diagnosis of neurocysticercosis according to Del Brutto et al. using two different antibody tests.

Diagnosis of NCC* Commercial Western blot CDC EITB
n Positive Negative nt n Positive Negative nt
No NCC 183 (86.3%) 0 20 163 177 (83.5%) 0 47 130
Probable NCC 22 (10.4%) 0 13 9 18 (8.5%) 6 11 1
Definitive NCC 7 (3.3%) 6 1 0 17 (8.0%) 17 0 0

*According to NCC diagnostic criteria of Del Brutto et al. [21], [22]

NCC... Neurocysticercosis, CDC EITB... Electroimmunotransfer blot developed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA, nt... Not tested.

Association of Antibody Test Results with Number and Type of Neurocysticercosis Lesions

The results of both antibody tests together with the number of total NCC lesions on CT, including cysts and calcifications, are listed in Table 4. The number of NCC lesions was significantly associated with a positive serum antibody result (Mann-Whitney-U, CWB: p = 0.006, CDC EITB: p<0.001). People with more CT lesions had a higher chance of a positive antibody result. Probably due to the low number of samples, there was no significant association in CSF (Mann-Whitney-U, p = 0.537).

Table 4. Number and activity of neurocysticercosis lesions on cerebral computed tomography scan and cysticercosis antibody results.

Number of NCC EITB CDC Commercial Western Blot CSF both tests
lesions on CT scan* Negative Positive Negative Positive Negative Positive
0 42 (91.3%) 4 (8.7%) 20 (100%) 0 (0.0%) 0 0
1 7 (77.8%) 2 (22.2%) 0 0 0 0
2–4 5 (45.5%) 6 (54.5%) 6 (100%) 0 (0.0%) 3 (100%) 0 (0.0%)
≥5 4 (26.7%) 11 (73.3%) 8 (57.1%) 6 (42.9%) 3 (37.5%) 5 (62.5%)
Total 58 (71.6%) 23 (28.4%) 34 (85.0%) 6 (15.0%) 6 (54.5%) 5 (45.5%)
Activity of NCC lesions on CT scan
Inactive 16 (55.2%) 13 (44.8%) 13 (92.9%) 1 (7.1%) 6 (85.7%) 1 (14.3%)
Active 0 (0%) 6 (100%) 1 (16.7%) 5 (83.3%) 0 (0%) 4 (100%)

*Including active and inactive lesions; NCC... Neurocysticercosis, CDC EITB... Electroimmunotransfer blot developed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, in Atlanta, GA, USA, CSF... Cerebrospinal fluid, CT...Computed tomography.

Active NCC lesions were significantly associated with a positive antibody result in both tests for serum and CSF (Fisher's exact test, Serum CWB: p = 0.002; Serum CDC EITB: p = 0.022; CSF both tests: p = 0.015, see Table 4). The prevalence of cysticercosis antibodies detected by the CDC EITB among people with single lesions was 22.2% (2/9, “sensitivity”, if CT was used as gold standard). CWB was not performed in people with single lesions (Table 4). People with at least two lesions, when analysed with CDC EITB and CWB had antibodies in 65.4% (17/26) and 30% (6/20), respectively (“sensitivity”, if CT was used as a gold standard). Looking at individuals with a positive CSF result, all corresponding serum samples were positive in the CDC EITB and four out of five were positive in the CWB.

Discussion

General Aspects

To our knowledge this is the first study that systematically compares demographic data and clinical characteristics of PWE with and without NCC in sub-Saharan Africa. A differentiation between these two groups is important not only because of the possible treatment of active NCC, but also because of prevention and disease control programs for NCC.

There are several limitations of our study. The diagnosis of epilepsy was made up to three years prior to the performance of the CT scan and the collection of specimens. Hence the number of people with active NCC might be underestimated. Due to lack of EEG the diagnosis of epilepsy is based on clinical examination and thorough interviews of patients and relatives. Epileptic seizures that appear generalized may have a short focal start that clinically goes unnoticed. Simple partial seizures may not be diagnosed, because patients do not report to the hospital. As to serology, it would have been preferable, if cysticercosis serology had been performed in all PWE. This unfortunately was not possible in our study.

Clinical Characteristics of People with Epilepsy and Neurocysticercosis

Demographic data about PWE in low income countries is limited. Singhvi et al. described the patterns of patients (n = 100) with intractable epilepsy at a tertiary center in India. All patients received at least two AEDs. In their study, the mean age was 23.2 years with a mean duration of seizures of 11.4 years and their mean seizure frequency was 12.4 seizures per month [29]. In our study, the mean age was higher with 28.2 years and the average age at first seizure was 17.7 years. The older age of our study population could be explained by the exclusion of children younger than ten years at time of diagnosis. The mean seizure frequency in our drug naïve PWE with 7.7 seizures per month was lower compared to the study of Singhvi et al.

The mean age of PWE with NCC in our study (32.5 years) is comparable to the mean age (28.6 years) of people with NCC in a large retrospective study of people with NCC treated in Houston, Texas, that included 202 individuals mainly presenting with seizures [30]. In our study, there was a trend that PWE with NCC were older and that they had their first seizure later compared to PWE without NCC. This may suggest that NCC should be considered as an underlying cause of epilepsy especially among PWE with a late onset of seizures. Other studies reported that NCC is the cause of late onset epilepsy in up to 50% [31][34]. However, a recent review revealed similar percentages of NCC associated epilepsy in the age group below 20 years and that of 20–54 years of age [10]. These data suggest that NCC has also to be considered as a cause of epilepsy in young PWE.

In our study, PWE with active NCC were significantly older than PWE with inactive NCC, which might be explained by a different immune response to the infestation with age. Porcine cysticercosis was first detected in our study area in the late 1980s and previously pig husbandry was not common [12]. If infestations caused more calcifications in younger people, the lower number of calcifications among older people could also be explained by the absence of NCC before the introduction of pig husbandry.

The gender in our study population of PWE was equally distributed, which is in accordance with another study in Tanzania [35] and with the conclusion of reviews about the prevalence of epilepsy in Asia [36] and sub-Saharan Africa [1], which did not find a significant difference regarding gender. In our study slightly more males had NCC, a result similar to the one reported by Nicoletti et al., who diagnosed 21 males and 14 females with NCC among 124 PWE [34].

It is remarkable that, although PWE with NCC were less compliant, they had a lower seizure frequency. The reduction of seizure frequency in compliant PWE was significantly higher in PWE with NCC compared to those without NCC. 78.6% of compliant PWE with NCC had no seizures, whereas this was only the case in 50.5% of compliant PWE without NCC. These observations not only suggest that the frequency of seizures due to NCC seems to decline faster over time, but also that anti-epileptic treatment with carbamazepine or phenobarbitone, which is available in most low income countries, is very efficient in controlling seizures due NCC. Del Brutto et al., who investigated 203 PWE with NCC, reported a similar seizure control rate of 83% [37].

The reason for the higher percentage of NCC among people of the Iraqw tribe might be that according to our observation pig farming is more common in that tribe compared to other tribes. This difference might disappear in future, because tribes are intermingling and pig husbandry seems to become abundant in all tribes.

The past psychiatric history and family history of seizures seem to be similar in PWE with and without NCC. In our study, the only significant risk factor associated with NCC was pork consumption. In this context, we want to stress that cysticercosis is a faecal-oral infestation and pork consumption is not a prerequisite for cysticercosis. The consumption of undercooked pork or the handling of infected pig meat could lead to a tapeworm carrier in the household. Lescano et al. showed that there is a significant cysticercosis seroprevalence gradient around a tapeworm carrier and that the risk for cysticercosis is high, if there is a tapeworm carrier in the household [38]. Other factors related to social status such as number of people per household or educational level and also pig contact or number of pigs per household were not significantly associated with NCC. The use of latrines, which has been identified as a risk factor for porcine cysticercosis [39], was almost omnipresent in our study population. The number of people who did not use a latrine (6/209) was too low to identify significant differences.

Antibody Tests for Cysticercosis in People with Epilepsy and Neurocysticercosis

It is difficult to define sensitivity and specificity of serological tests for cysticercosis, because the gold standard for the diagnosis of NCC is not well defined. Probably the best available single examination to diagnose NCC in low income countries is a CT scan. Taking the CT result as a gold standard, the comparison between the two antibody tests for cysticercosis revealed a difference mainly in terms of sensitivity. Especially among people with lesions highly suggestive of NCC, which are mainly multiple calcified lesions, the CDC EITB had a higher sensitivity than the CWB. Antibodies were detected in 52.2% and 13.3% with the CDC EITB and the CWB, respectively. However, sensitivity was low compared to other studies that reported a sensitivity of 60% to 89% in sera with only calcified cysts [40], [41]. Rajshekhar et al., who studied NCC and epilepsy in India, showed a positive EITB result in 26.1% (12/46) of PWE with NCC lesions on CT scan [7]. This relatively low number could be explained by the high percentage of people with only one or two calcifications (81.3%). In Peru, Montano et al. detected antibodies in 46.7% (7/15) of PWE with NCC lesions on CT scan. The type of lesions however was not specified [6]. In active lesions, where the CDC EITB detected antibodies in all six samples and the CWB in five of six, the number of samples was too low to show significant differences. Our results confirm the high sensitivity of the CDC EITB in people with more than one viable NCC cysts [28], [40]. As expected the total number of active and inactive NCC lesions was positively correlated with a positive antibody result in both tests. It seems that a higher burden of disease leads more often to a detectable antibody response. When looking at PWE with normal CT, it seems that the specificity of the CDC EITB (91.3%) is lower compared to the CWB (100%). However, it has to be considered that cysticercosis may be present in other organs such as eye and subcutaneous/muscular tissue or that calcifications smaller than 10 mm may be missed because of the thickness of CT slices. The specificity of the EITB is very high, near 100%, with only a few anecdotal reports [42], [43] of false positive results since the time the test was introduced in 1989. Therefore, it seems probable that the four PWE with a positive CDC EITB and normal CT scan may have had some exposure to T. solium larvae in the past or may harbour cysts in other organs than the brain.

The analysis of CSF with CDC EITB did not give additional information regarding the diagnosis of NCC, because all CSF positive cases had also positive serum samples. Our results are in accordance with the study of Proaño-Narvaez et al, in which analysis of serum and CSF samples with a EITB for cysticercosis were equally sensitive and specific [44]. We conclude that an analysis of CSF may only be indicated, if a quantitative test is used in order to calculate a specific T. solium antibody index of a serum/CSF pair.

In summary, our study compares demographic and clinical characteristics of PWE with and without NCC in rural northern Tanzania, showing that PWE with NCC tend to be older with a later onset of seizures compared to those without NCC. Seizure frequency in compliant PWE with NCC, using AEDs available on site, seems to respond better than in compliant PWE without NCC. The only risk factor for NCC that could be identified is consumption of pork. In addition, the sensitivity and specificity of a commercially available western blot and the CDC EITB was tested in PWE with NCC showing a higher sensitivity of the latter, especially in PWE with calcifications.

Supporting Information

Checklist S1

STROBE checklist.

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

The authors are very grateful to the staff and supporters of the Haydom Lutheran Hospital, especially to Michaeli Ombay and Bartholomayo Mathias, who are in charge of the Mental Health Unit. Without their support this study would not have been possible. We are also indebted to the PWE of the Haydom Lutheran Epilepsy Clinic who have patiently endured our lengthy interviews.

Footnotes

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

The study was supported by the Savoy Epilepsy Foundation, Quebec, Canada and ASW was supported by the Centre for International Migration, Frankfurt, Germany. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Preux PM, Druet-Cabanac M. Epidemiology and aetiology of epilepsy in sub-Saharan Africa. Lancet Neurol. 2005;4:21–31. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(04)00963-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Meyer A, Dua T, Ma J, Saxena S, Birbeck G. Global disparities in the epilepsy treatment gap: a systematic review. Bull World Health Organ. 2010;88:260–266. doi: 10.2471/BLT.09.064147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dumas M, Preux PM. [Epilepsy in tropical areas]. Bull Acad Natl Med. 2008;192:949–960. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Winkler AS, Kerschbaumsteiner K, Stelzhammer B, Meindl M, Kaaya J, et al. Prevalence, incidence, and clinical characteristics of epilepsy--a community-based door-to-door study in northern Tanzania. Epilepsia. 2009;50:2310–2313. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2009.02184.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.De Bittencourt PR, Adamolekum B, Bharucha N, Carpio A, Cossío OH, et al. Epilepsy in the tropics: II. Clinical presentations, pathophysiology, immunologic diagnosis, economics, and therapy. Epilepsia. 1996;37:1128–1137. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1996.tb01036.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Montano SM, Villaran MV, Ylquimiche L, Figueroa JJ, Rodriguez S, et al. Neurocysticercosis: association between seizures, serology, and brain CT in rural Peru. Neurology. 2005;65:229–233. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000168828.83461.09. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Rajshekhar V, Raghava MV, Prabhakaran V, Oommen A, Muliyil J. Active epilepsy as an index of burden of neurocysticercosis in Vellore district, India. Neurology. 2006;67:2135–2139. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000249113.11824.64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Medina MT, Durón RM, Martínez L, Osorio JR, Estrada AL, et al. Prevalence, incidence, and etiology of epilepsies in rural Honduras: the Salamá Study. Epilepsia. 2005;46:124–131. doi: 10.1111/j.0013-9580.2005.11704.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Quet F, Guerchet M, Pion SDS, Ngoungou EB, Nicoletti A, et al. Meta-analysis of the association between cysticercosis and epilepsy in Africa. Epilepsia. 2010;51:830–837. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2009.02401.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ndimubanzi PC, Carabin H, Budke CM, Nguyen H, Qian Y, et al. A systematic review of the frequency of neurocyticercosis with a focus on people with epilepsy. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010;4:e870. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Winkler AS, Willingham AL, Sikasunge CS, Schmutzhard E. Epilepsy and neurocysticercosis in sub-Saharan Africa. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2009;121(Suppl 3):3–12. doi: 10.1007/s00508-009-1242-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Phiri IK, Ngowi H, Afonso S, Matenga E, Boa M, et al. The emergence of Taenia solium cysticercosis in Eastern and Southern Africa as a serious agricultural problem and public health risk. Acta Trop. 2003;87:13–23. doi: 10.1016/s0001-706x(03)00051-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Carabin H, Krecek RC, Cowan LD, Michael L, Foyaca-Sibat H, et al. Estimation of the cost of Taenia solium cysticercosis in Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. Trop Med Int Health. 2006;11:906–916. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2006.01627.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Winkler AS, Blocher J, Auer H, Gotwald T, Matuja W, et al. Anticysticercal and antitoxocaral antibodies in people with epilepsy in rural Tanzania. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2008;102:1032–1038. doi: 10.1016/j.trstmh.2008.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Winkler AS, Blocher J, Auer H, Gotwald T, Matuja W, et al. Epilepsy and neurocysticercosis in rural Tanzania-An imaging study. Epilepsia. 2009;50:987–993. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2008.01867.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Haydom Lutheran Hospital. Haydom Lutheran Hospital Annual report 2008. Haydom Lutheran Hospital. 2008. Available at: http://www.haydom.no/facts_and_map.aspx. Accessed March 10th, 2011.
  • 17.Schaffert M. Medical Thesis, Medical University Innsbruck; 2005. A clinic for people with epilepsy in rural Tanzania: patientś characteristics, a classification system, pattern of injuries and a 25-month follow up. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Senanayake N, Román GC. Epidemiology of epilepsy in developing countries. Bull World Health Organ. 1993;71:247–258. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Winkler AS, Schaffert M, Schmutzhard E. Epilepsy in resource poor countries--suggestion of an adjusted classification. Epilepsia. 2007;48:1029–1030. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2007.01009_1.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.ILAE. Proposal for revised clinical and electroencephalographic classification of epileptic seizures. From the Commission on Classification and Terminology of the International League Against Epilepsy. Epilepsia. 1981;22:489–501. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1981.tb06159.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Del Brutto OH. Neurocysticercosis. Semin Neurol. 2005;25:243–251. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-917661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Del Brutto OH, Rajshekhar V, White AC, Tsang VC, Nash TE, et al. Proposed diagnostic criteria for neurocysticercosis. Neurology. 2001;57:177–183. doi: 10.1212/wnl.57.2.177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Nash TE, Del Brutto OH, Butman JA, Corona T, Delgado-Escueta A, et al. Calcific neurocysticercosis and epileptogenesis. Neurology. 2004;62:1934–1938. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000129481.12067.06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Nash TE, Singh G, White AC, Rajshekhar V, Loeb JA, et al. Treatment of neurocysticercosis: current status and future research needs. Neurology. 2006;67:1120–1127. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000238514.51747.3a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Simac C, Michel P, Andriantsimahavandy A, Esterre P, Michault A. [Value of immunodiagnosis by ELISA and Western blotting for the diagnostic and therapeutic management of neurocysticercosis]. Arch Inst Pasteur Madagascar. 1994;61:21–27. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Simac C, Michel P, Andriantsimahavandy A, Esterre P, Michault A. Use of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and enzyme-linked immunoelectrotransfer blot for the diagnosis and monitoring of neurocysticercosis. Parasitol Res. 1995;81:132–136. doi: 10.1007/BF00931618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Michault A, Rivière B, Fressy P, Laporte JP, Bertil G, et al. [Contribution of enzyme-linked immuno-electrotransfer blot assay for the diagnosis of human neurocysticercosis]. Pathol Biol. 1990;38:119–125. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Tsang VC, Brand JA, Boyer AE. An enzyme-linked immunoelectrotransfer blot assay and glycoprotein antigens for diagnosing human cysticercosis (Taenia solium). J Infect Dis. 1989;159:50–59. doi: 10.1093/infdis/159.1.50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Singhvi JP, Sawhney IM, Lal V, Pathak A, Prabhakar S. Profile of intractable epilepsy in a tertiary referral center. Neurol India. 2000;48:351–356. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Serpa JA, Yancey LS, White AC. Advances in the diagnosis and management of neurocysticercosis. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2006;4:1051–1061. doi: 10.1586/14787210.4.6.1051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Rigatti M, Trevisol-Bittencourt PC. [Causes of late-onset epilepsy in an epilepsy clinic of Santa Catarina--Southern Brazil]. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 1999;57:787–792. doi: 10.1590/s0004-282x1999000500009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Medina MT, Rosas E, Rubio-Donnadieu F, Sotelo J. Neurocysticercosis as the main cause of late-onset epilepsy in Mexico. Arch Intern Med. 1990;150:325–327. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Del Brutto OH, Santibáñez R, Idrovo L, Rodrìguez S, Díaz-Calderón E, et al. Epilepsy and neurocysticercosis in Atahualpa: a door-to-door survey in rural coastal Ecuador. Epilepsia. 2005;46:583–587. doi: 10.1111/j.0013-9580.2005.36504.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Nicoletti A, Bartoloni A, Sofia V, Bartalesi F, Chavez JR, et al. Epilepsy and neurocysticercosis in rural Bolivia: a population-based survey. Epilepsia. 2005;46:1127–1132. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2005.67804.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Dent W, Helbok R, Matuja WBP, Scheunemann S, Schmutzhard E. Prevalence of active epilepsy in a rural area in South Tanzania: a door-to-door survey. Epilepsia. 2005;46:1963–1969. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2005.00338.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Mac TL, Tran D, Quet F, Odermatt P, Preux PM, et al. Epidemiology, aetiology, and clinical management of epilepsy in Asia: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol. 2007;6:533–543. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70127-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Del Brutto OH, Santibañez R, Noboa CA, Aguirre R, Díaz E, et al. Epilepsy due to neurocysticercosis: analysis of 203 patients. Neurology. 1992;42:389–392. doi: 10.1212/wnl.42.2.389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Lescano AG, Garcia HH, Gilman RH, Gavidia CM, Tsang VCW, et al. Taenia solium cysticercosis hotspots surrounding tapeworm carriers: clustering on human seroprevalence but not on seizures. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2009;3:e371. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ngowi HA, Kassuku AA, Maeda GEM, Boa ME, Carabin H, et al. Risk factors for the prevalence of porcine cysticercosis in Mbulu District, Tanzania. Vet Parasitol. 2004;120:275–283. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2004.01.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Wilkins PP, Wilson M, Allan JC, Tsang VCW. Taenia solium Cysticercosis: Immunodiagnosis of Neurocysticercosis and Taeniasis. In: Singh G, Prabhakar S (2002) Taenia solium cysticercosis. CAB International. 2002. pp. 329–341.
  • 41.Wilson M, Bryan RT, Fried JA, Ware DA, Schantz PM, et al. Clinical evaluation of the cysticercosis enzyme-linked immunoelectrotransfer blot in patients with neurocysticercosis. J Infect Dis. 1991;164:1007–1009. doi: 10.1093/infdis/164.5.1007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ong S, Talan DA, Moran GJ, Mower W, Newdow M, et al. Neurocysticercosis in radiographically imaged seizure patients in U.S. emergency departments. Emerging Infect Dis. 2002;8:608–613. doi: 10.3201/eid0806.010377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kojic EM, White AC. A positive enzyme-linked immunoelectrotransfer blot assay result for a patient without evidence of cysticercosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2003;36:e7–9. doi: 10.1086/344445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Proaño-Narvaez JV, Meza-Lucas A, Mata-Ruiz O, García-Jerónimo RC, Correa D. Laboratory diagnosis of human neurocysticercosis: double-blind comparison of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and electroimmunotransfer blot assay. J Clin Microbiol. 2002;40:2115–2118. doi: 10.1128/JCM.40.6.2115-2118.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Checklist S1

STROBE checklist.

(PDF)


Articles from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES