Abstract
Rosiglitazone is a synthetic agonist of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ which is used to improve insulin resistance in patients with type II diabetes. Rosiglitazone exerts its glucose-lowering effects by improving insulin sensitivity. Data from various studies in the past decade suggest that the therapeutic effects of rosiglitazone reach far beyond its use as an insulin sensitizer since it also has other benefits on the cardiovascular system such as improvement of contractile dysfunction, inhibition of the inflammatory response by reducing neutrophil and macrophage accumulation, and the protection of myocardial injury during ischemic/reperfusion in different animal models. Previous clinical studies in type II diabetes patients demonstrated that rosiglitazone played an important role in protecting against arteriosclerosis by normalizing the metabolic disorders and reducing chronic inflammation of the vascular system. Despite these benefits, inconsistent findings have been reported, and growing evidence has demonstrated adverse effects of rosiglitazone on the cardiovascular system, including increased risk of acute myocardial infarction, heart failure and chronic heart failure. As a result, rosiglitazone has been recently withdrawn from EU countries. Nevertheless, the effect of rosiglitazone on ischemic heart disease has not yet been firmly established. Future prospective clinical trials designed for the specific purpose of establishing the cardiovascular benefit or risk of rosiglitazone would be the best way to resolve the uncertainties regarding the safety of rosiglitazone in patients with heart disease.
Keywords: Rosiglitazone, Ischemic reperfusion injury, Heart disease, Type II diabetic, Thiazolidinediones
INTRODUCTION
Type II diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a disease whose incidence is dramatically increasing and requires continuing medical management in many countries[1,2]. T2DM is characterized by insulin resistance and impaired glucose tolerance[3]. The development of T2DM involves 3 metabolic defects that include insulin resistance, alterations in hepatic glucose production and β-cell deficiency[4]. The earliest defect seen in the development of T2DM is insulin resistance[4]. In this state, the β-cells produce large amounts of insulin reaching a supraphysiologic level as a compensatory response to peripheral tissue insulin resistance. If insulin resistance is left untreated, the β-cells begin to fail to produce insulin, resulting in a state of relative insulin deficiency[4]. T2DM is known to develop after this phase. T2DM patients have a 2- to 4-fold increased risk of developing coronary artery disease, unstable angina and myocardial infarction (MI)[5,6]. Furthermore, T2DM patients have been shown to have a worse prognosis than non-diabetic patients after a cardiovascular event[7,8].
Thiazolidinediones (TZDs) are an oral medication developed to reduce insulin resistance in T2DM patients and have been used since 1997[9]. TZDs exert their properties by stimulating a nuclear hormone receptor, the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ)[10]. Troglitazone was the first drug developed but was withdrawn from the market due to liver toxicity[9]. Currently, pioglitazone and rosiglitazone are the only compounds that are available for clinical use[9]. However, the effects of rosiglitazone have been controversial regarding cardiovascular effects in both animal and clinical studies[11-59]. On the positive side, rosiglitazone has been shown to exert its potent insulin sensitization by improving insulin resistance in T2DM[10,60]. Various studies demonstrated that the therapeutic effects of rosiglitazone could reach far beyond its action as an insulin sensitizer because it has other therapeutic effects on many organs especially in the cardiovascular system in both animal models and humans[11-59]. Nevertheless, in the past decade growing evidence from both basic and clinical studies indicates that rosiglitazone could be harmful to the heart[11-25]. Because of its serious undesired effects, rosiglitazone has been recently withdrawn from the EU market[61], and is under close monitoring by the US Food and Drug Administration[62,63].
In this review, we aim to summarize and discuss the overall benefits as well as the adverse effects of rosiglitazone on the heart from both pre-clinical and clinical reports. Understanding the inconsistent findings as well as the limitations found in each study using rosiglitazone should allow investigators to carefully design future studies that hopefully can clarify previous inconsistent findings, and to indicate whether rosiglitazone should be used in patients.
BENEFICIAL EFFECTS OF ROSIGLITAZONE ON THE CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM
Previous studies reported that rosiglitazone had beneficial effects on the cardiovascular system in in vitro, in vivo and clinical studies. These beneficial effects of rosiglitazone are summarized in Table 1. In rat models of ischemic/reperfusion (I/R) injury, pretreatment with rosiglitazone reduced the infarct size and improved ischemia/reperfusion-induced myocardial contractile dysfunction[26,46,48]. Rosiglitazone treatment also improved left ventricular (LV) systolic pressure and positive and negative maximal values of the first derivative of LV pressure (dP/dt) during I/R injury[32,46]. In addition, in both obese and normal rats rosiglitazone could decrease systolic blood pressure, improve contractile function and normalize the insulin level[31,44,45]. These findings suggested that rosiglitazone could prevent the development of hypertension associated with insulin resistance. This notion was supported by the finding that rosiglitazone treatment could enhance nitric oxide (NO)-mediated arteriolar dilation[28]. Furthermore the accumulation of neutrophils and macrophages and expression of monocyte chemoattractant factor (MCP)-1 in the ischemic heart was diminished by rosiglitazone[46]. Likewise, rosiglitazone treatment in diabetic rat and mouse models reduced the blood levels of glucose, triglycerides, and free fatty acids, and enhanced cardiac glucose oxidation in the ischemic myocardium[26,50]. Rosiglitazone treatment also reduced myocardial apoptosis and infarction size post I/R injury by restoring the balance between the pro-apoptotic and anti-apoptotic mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway, increasing phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase-Akt phosphorylation, and inhibiting p42/44 MAPK[26,35,38,41,59].
Table 1.
Models | Dose of rosiglitazone | Major findings | Interpretation | Ref. |
Cultured neonatal rat cardiomyocytes | 5 μmol/L; pretreated for 30 min before stimulation with Ang II (1 μmol/L) for 48 h | Inhibited Ang II-induced upregulation of skeletal α-actin and ANP genes, and prevent an increase in cell surface area | Rosiglitazone involved in the inhibition of cardiac hypertrophy | [27] |
Isolated and cultured neonatal rat ventricular myocytes | 1, 5, 10 μmol/L; pretreated for 48 h | Accelerated Ca2+ transient decay rates | Cardioprotective effects of rosiglitazone may be mediated via NF-κB | [43] |
Increased SERCA2 mRNA levels | ||||
Upregulation of IL-6 secretion | ||||
Enhanced TNF-α- and lipopolysaccharide-induced NF-κB-dependent transcription | ||||
Isolated and cultured adult rat ventricular myocytes | 10-8-10-5 mol; pretreated for 24 h | Did not increase protein synthesis | Rosiglitazone did not directly induce cardiomyocyte hypertrophy in cardiomyocytes | [30] |
Did not attenuate hypertrophic response to noradrenaline, phorbol-12-myristate13-acetate and endothelin-1 | ||||
Cultured neonatal rat ventricular myocytes | 10 μmol/L; pretreated for 24 h | Inhibited the endothelin-1-induced increase in protein synthesis, surface area, calcineurin enzymatic activity, and protein expression | Rosiglitazone inhibited endothelin-1-induced cardiac hypertrophy via calcineurin/nuclear factor of activated T-cells pathway | [29] |
Inhibited the nuclear translocation of NFATc4 | ||||
Enhanced the association between PPARγ and calcineurin/nuclear factor of activated T-cells | ||||
Cultured rat cardiomyoblast cell line H9c2(2-1) | 100 μmol/L; pretreated for 24 h | Increased expression of heme oxygenase 1 | Rosiglitazone had cardioprotective effects against oxidative stress | [40] |
Increased cell viability under oxidative stress induced by H2O2 | ||||
Cultured neonatal rat cardiac fibroblasts | 0.1, 1, 10 μmol/L pretreated for 48 h | Inhibited cardiac fibroblast proliferation | Rosiglitazone could prevent myocardial fibrosis | [37] |
Increased connective tissue growth factor expression | ||||
Decreased nitric oxide production induced by advanced glycation endproducts | ||||
Cultured neonatal rat ventricular myocytes | 1 μmol/L; pretreated for 30 min prior to H2O2 treatment | Decrease cell apoptosis | Rosiglitazone protected cells from oxidative stress through upregulating Bcl-2 expression | [42] |
Increase Bcl-2 protein content | ||||
Cultured neonatal rat cardiac myocytes | 0.1, 1, 3, 10, 30 μmol/L; pretreated for 30 min before hypoxia | Decreased cytoplasmic accumulation of histone-associated DNA fragments | Rosiglitazone protected cardiac myocytes against I/R injury by facilitating Akt rephosphorylation | [35] |
Increased reoxygenation-induced rephosphorylation of Akt | ||||
Did not alter phosphorylation of the MAP kinases ERK1/2 and c-Jun N-terminal kinase | ||||
Fatty Zucker rats | 7-7.5 μmol/L per kilogram po; 9-12 wk | Decreased systolic blood pressure | Rosiglitazone prevented the development of HT and endothelial dysfunction associated with insulin resistance | [45] |
Decreased fasting hyperinsulinemia | ||||
Improved mesenteric arteries contraction and relaxation | ||||
Rats with I/R injury | 3 mg/kg per day po; pretreated for d; 1 and 3 mg/kg iv given during I/R | Improved left ventricular systolic pressure, dP/dtmax and dP/dtmin | Rosiglitazone decreased infarct size and improved contractile dysfunction during I/R possibly via inhibition of the inflammatory response | [46] |
Reduced neutrophils and macrophages accumulation | ||||
Reduced the infarct size | ||||
Downregulation of CD11b/CD18 | ||||
Upregulation of L-selectin on neutrophils and monocytes | ||||
Fatty Zucker rats with I/R injury (Ex vivo model) | 3 mg/kg po; 7 or 14 d prior to isolated perfuse heart study | Normalized the insulin resistance | Rosiglitazone protected obese rat heart from I/R injury | [44] |
Restored GLUT4 protein levels | ||||
Improved contractile function | ||||
Prevented greater loss of ATP | ||||
I/R injury in isolated perfused normal and STZ- induced diabetic rat hearts (Ex vivo model) | 1 μmol/L given prior to ischemia; 10 μmol/kg per day po after STZ injection for 4 wk | Inhibited activating protein-1 DNA-binding activity | Rosiglitazone attenuated postischemic myocardial injury in isolated rat heart | [34] |
Inhibited of Jun NH2-terminal kinase phosphorylation | ||||
Reduced lactate levels and lactate dehydrogenase activity | ||||
Sprague-Dawley rats | 5 mg/kg per day po; 7 d | Reduced systolic blood pressure | Rosiglitazone prevented the development of hypertension and endothelial dysfunction | [31] |
Reduced vascular DNA synthesis, expression of cyclin D1 and cdk4, AT1 receptors, vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, and platelet and endothelial cell adhesion molecule, and NF-κB activity | ||||
T2DM mice | 3 mg/kg per day po; 7 d | Did not affect serum glucose and insulin | Rosiglitazone enhanced nitric oxide mediation of coronary arteriolar dilations via attenuating oxidative stress in T2DM mice | [28] |
Increased serum 8-isoprostane and dihydroethydine-detectable superoxide production | ||||
Enhanced catalase and reduced NAD(P)H oxidase activity | ||||
Did not affect SOD activity | ||||
Hypercholesterolemic New Zealand rabbits with I/R injury | 3 mg/kg per day po; 5 wk prior to I/R | Attenuated postischemic myocardial nitrative stress | Rosiglitazone attenuated arteriosclerosis and prevented I/R-induced myocardial apoptosis | [38] |
Restored a beneficial balance between pro- and anti-apoptotic MAPK signaling | ||||
Reduced postischemic myocardial apoptosis | ||||
Improved cardiac functional recovery | ||||
Zucker diabetic fatty rats with I/R injury | 3 mg/kg per day po; 8 d prior to I/R | Reduced blood glucose, triglycerides, and free fatty acids levels | Rosiglitazone protected heart against I/R injury | [26] |
Enhanced cardiac glucose oxidation | ||||
Increased Akt phosphorylation (Akt-pS473) and its downstream targets (glycogen synthase kinase-3β and FKHR-pS256) (forkhead transcription factor) | ||||
Reduced apoptotic cardiomyocytes and myocardial infarct size | ||||
Sprague-Dawley rats with I/R injury | 3 mg/kg per day po; 7 d prior to I/R | Reduced infarct size | Rosiglitazone attenuated myocardial I/R injury possibly via increase expression of AT2 and inhibition of p42/44 MAPK | [41] |
Decreased myocardial expression of AT1 receptors | ||||
Increased AT2 mRNA and protein expression | ||||
Inhibited p42/44 MAPK | ||||
Did not alter Akt1 expression | ||||
Sprague-Dawley rats with I/R injury | 3 mg/kg per day po for 8 wk prior to I/R | Improved left ventricular dP/dtmax and dP/dtmin | Rosiglitazone had a beneficial effect on post-infarct ventricular remodeling, but had a neutral effect on mortality | [32] |
Inhibited myocardial angiotensin II and aldosterone | ||||
No significant effects on myocardial AT1 and AT2 mRNA | ||||
WT and eNOS knockout mice with I/R injury | 3 mg/kg ip; retreated for 45 min prior to I/R | WT mice: increased the recovery of left ventricular function and coronary flow following ischemia | Rosiglitazone protected the heart against I/R injury via nitric oxide by phosphorylation of eNOS | [48] |
eNOS knockout mice: suppressed the recovery of myocardial function following ischemia | ||||
Isolated perfused hearts from T2DM mice | 23 mg/kg per day po; pretreated for 5 wk | Normalized plasma glucose and lipid concentrations | Rosiglitazone improved cardiac efficiency and ventricular function | [50] |
Restored rates of cardiac glucose and fatty acid oxidation | ||||
Improved cardiac efficiency due to decrease in unloaded myocardial oxygen consumption | ||||
Improved functional recovery after low-flow ischemia | ||||
WT and APN knockdown/knockout mice with myocardial infarction | 20 mg/kg per day po; pretreated 72 h prior to MI and continuously treated until 7 and 14 d | Improved the postischemic survival rate of WT mice at 14 d of treatment | APN was crucial for cardioprotective effects of rosiglitazone in myocardial infarction | [57] |
Increased adipocyte APN expression | ||||
Elevated plasma APN levels | ||||
Reduced infarct size | ||||
Decreased apoptosis and oxidative stress | ||||
Improved cardiac function | ||||
Hypercholesterolemic rats | 4 mg/kg per day po; pretreated for 5 mo | Reduced Ang II level | Rosiglitazone protected the heart against cardiac hypertrophy via improved lipid profile, reduced Ang-II and increase AT2 expression | [54] |
Upregulated AT2 | ||||
Improved lipid metabolism | ||||
Mice with I/R injury | 3 mg/kg per day po; pretreated for 14 d prior to I/R | Reduced ratio of infarct size to ischemic area (area at risk) | Cardioprotective effects of rosiglitazone against I/R injury were mediated via a PI3K/Akt/GSK-3α-dependent pathway | [59] |
Reduced the occurrence ventricular fibrillation | ||||
Attenuated cardiac apoptosis | ||||
Increased levels of p-Akt and p-GSK-3α | ||||
T2DM patients (n = 21) | 4 mg/d; 6 mo | Weight loss (first 12 wk) | Rosiglitazone amplified some of the positive benefits of lifestyle intervention | [55] |
Decreased waist circumference | ||||
Decreased systolic and diastolic blood pressure | ||||
Reduced HbA1c | ||||
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in T2DM (n = 357) | 4 or 8 mg/d; 26 wk | Reduced C-reactive protein, matrix metalloproteinase-9 and white blood cell levels | Rosiglitazone had beneficial effects on overall cardiovascular risk | [49] |
Did not alter interleukin-6 level | ||||
Randomized, double-blind in CAD patients without diabetes (n = 40, control = 44) | 4 mg/d for 8 wk ollowed by 8 mg/d for 4 wk | Reduced E-selectin | Rosiglitazone reduces markers of endothelial cell activation and levels of acute-phase reactants in CAD patients without DM | [56] |
Reduced von Willebrand | ||||
Reduced C-reactive protein & fibrinogen | ||||
Reduced homeostasis model of insulin resistance index | ||||
Elevation of LDL and triglyceride level | ||||
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in T2DM with CAD patients (n = 54) | 4-8 mg/d; 16 wk | Improved glycemic control and whole-body insulin sensitivity | Rosiglitazone facilitated myocardial glucose storage and utilization in T2DM with CAD patients | [36] |
Increased myocardial glucose uptake in both ischemic and non-ischemic regions | ||||
Randomized controlled trial in patients with impaired glucose tolerance (n = 2365, control = 2634) | 8 mg/d; 3 yr | Facilitated normoglycemic | Rosiglitazone reduced incidence of T2DM and increased normoglycemia | [47] |
Did not alter cardiovascular event | ||||
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients with T2DM (n = 70, control =16) | 8 mg/d; 6 mo | Decreased plasma glucose and HbA1c with a trend to decrease HOMA index | Rosiglitazone improved endothelial function and C-reactive protein in patients with T2DM | [51] |
Decreased C-peptide and fasting insulin | ||||
Reduced C-reactive protein | ||||
Improved endothelium-dependent dilation | ||||
Randomized, controlled trial in patient with T2DM with CAD (Rosiglitazone; n = 25) | 4 mg/d; 12 wk | Decreased insulin resistance | Rosiglitazone prevented arteriosclerosis by normalizing metabolic disorders and reducing chronic inflammation of the vascular system | [58] |
Decreased pulse wave velocity | ||||
Reduced plasma levels of C-reactive protein and monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 | ||||
Prospective and cross-sectional study in T2DM (Rosiglitazone; n = 22, metformin/rosiglitazone; n = 100) | Treated with rosiglitazone 6 mo | Decreased endotoxin | Lower endotoxin and higher adiponectin in the groups treated with rosiglitazone may be responsible for the improved insulin sensitivity | [39] |
Increased adiponectin levels | ||||
Comprehensive meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (n = 42922, control = 45483) | Results of 164 trials with duration > 4 wk | The OR for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality with rosiglitazone was 0.93 and 0.94, respectively | Rosiglitazone did not increase risk of MI or cardiovascular mortality | [52] |
The OR for nonfatal MI and heart failure with rosiglitazone was 1.14 (0.9-1.45) and 1.69 (1.21-2.36), respectively | ||||
The risk of heart failure was higher when rosiglitazone was administered as add-on therapy to insulin |
Ang: Angiotensin; ANP: Atrial natriuretic peptide; OR: Odds ratio; T2DM: Type 2 diabetes mellitus; Hb: Hemoglobin; HOMA: Homeostatic Model of Insulin Resistance; CAD: Coronary artery disease; WT: Wild-type; APN: Adiponectin; eNOS: Endothelial nitric oxide synthase; GSK: Glycogen synthase kinase; LDL: Low density lipoprotein; AT: Angiotensin receptor type; SOD: Superoxide dismutase; MAPK: Mitogen-activated protein kinase; PI3K: Phosphatidyl inositol-3-kinase; STZ: Streptozotocin; I/R: Ischemia/reperfusion; TNF: Tumor necrosis factor; IL: Interleukin; NF: Nuclear factor; SERCA: sarcoendoplasmic reticulum calcium ATPase; HT: Hypertension; NFAT: nuclear factor of activated T cells; ERK: Extracellular signal-regulated kinase; PPAR: Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor; MI: Myocardial infarction.
In in vitro studies, incubation of a rat cardiomyoblast cell line with rosiglitazone demonstrated cardioprotective effects against oxidative stress, and the antioxidant enzyme heme oxygenase 1 was upregulated in these cells after rosiglitazone treatment[40]. Furthermore, rosiglitazone could inhibit cardiac fibroblast proliferation, increase connective tissue growth factor expression and decrease NO production induced by advanced glycation endproducts in cultured neonatal rat cardiac fibroblasts[37]. In addition, rosiglitazone could prevent cardiac hypertrophy by inhibiting angiotensin II[27,32,54].
Many clinical studies reported that the beneficial effects of rosiglitazone on the cardiovascular system were similar to those from animal studies. Rosiglitazone therapy has been shown to reduce cardiovascular complications associated with T2DM[47,49,58]. Data from preliminary studies in patients who underwent coronary angioplasty and stent implantation demonstrated that rosiglitazone treatment for 6 mo led to a lower occurrence of restenosis and a lower degree of stenosis of the luminal diameter after angioplasty[64]. Furthermore, a study in patients with T2DM demonstrated that treatment with 4 mg/d of rosiglitazone for 12 wk decreased not only insulin resistance but also pulse wave velocity, which is a direct parameter of arterial stiffness in patients with diabetes and coronary arteries disease (CAD)[58]. Rosiglitazone has been shown to reduce plasma levels of C-reactive protein[5,51,56,58], matrix metalloproteinase-9 and MCP-1[58] in T2DM patients, suggesting that rosiglitazone plays an important role in protecting against arteriosclerosis by normalizing metabolic disorders and reducing chronic inflammation of the vascular system. Rosiglitazone treatment in patients with T2DM with/without CAD has also been shown to improve myocardial glucose uptake and utilization[36,47]. Rosiglitazone decreased both systolic and diastolic pressure[53,55], suggesting that this drug could improve systolic and diastolic function. All of these findings indicate that in addition to improving insulin resistance in T2DM patients, rosiglitazone also has the beneficial effects on overall cardiovascular risk.
ADVERSE EFFECTS OF ROSIGLITAZONE ON THE CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM
Despite these previously mentioned beneficial effects of rosiglitazone on the cardiovascular system, growing evidence indicates other adverse cardiovascular outcomes. The effect of rosiglitazone in increasing mortality in post-MI rats was first reported by Lygate et al[21] in 2003. Later, more studies, including clinical trials, demonstrated undesirable effects of rosiglitazone on the cardiovascular system. These findings suggested that rosiglitazone treatment may be harmful and should be used with caution in cardiovascular patients. A summary of reports on the adverse effects of rosiglitazone in various models as well as clinical studies are shown in Table 2.
Table 2.
Model | Dose of rosiglitazone | Major findings | Interpretation | Ref. |
Isolated and cultured vascular smooth muscle cells | 1-10 μmol/L; incubated for 24 h | Induced cell death in a concentration-dependent manner | Rosiglitazone induced apoptotic cell death through an ERK1/2-independent pathway | [17] |
Increased caspase 3 activity and the cytoplasmic histone-associated DNA fragmentation | ||||
PD98059 (MAPKK inhibitor) did not abolish rosiglitazone induced ERK1/2 activation (proapoptotic effects) | ||||
Rats with I/R injury | 3 mg/kg per day po; pretreated for 14 d prior to I/R | Did not reduce left ventricular infarct size or hypertrophy | Rosiglitazone did not prevent left ventricular remodeling, but was associated with increased mortality after myocardial infarction | [21] |
Increased mortality rate | ||||
Improved ejection fraction and prevented an increase left ventricular end diastolic pressure | ||||
Swine with I/R injury | 3 mg/kg per day po; pretreated for 8 d prior to I/R | Increased expression of PPARγ | Rosiglitazone had no cardioprotective effects in a swine model of myocardial I/R injury | [25] |
Had no effect on myocardial contractile function | ||||
Did not alter substrate uptake and proinflammatory cytokines expression | ||||
PPARγ-knockout (CM-PGKO) mouse | 10 mg/kg per day po; 4 wk | Increased phosphorylation of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase | Rosiglitazone caused cardiac hypertrophy at least partially independent of PPARγ in cardiomyocytes | [15] |
Induced phosphorylation of extracellular signal-related kinase 1/2 | ||||
Did not affect phosphorylation of c-Jun N-terminal kinases | ||||
Induced cardiac hypertrophy | ||||
Wild type and PPARγ overexpression mice | 10 mg/kg per day po; 15 d | Increased lipid accumulation | Rosiglitazone and PPARγ overexpression could be harmful to cardiac function | [24] |
Increased size of the heart | ||||
Decreased fractional shortening | ||||
Increased CD36 expression | ||||
Swine with I/R injury | 0.1, 1.0 10 mg/kg iv; pretreated for 60 min | Attenuated MAP shortening during ischemia by blocking cardiac KATP channels | Rosiglitazone promoted onset of ventricular fibrillation during cardiac ischemia | [20] |
Increased propensity for ventricular fibrillation during myocardial ischemia | ||||
Sprague-Dawley rats | 15 mg/kg per day po; 21 d | Induced eccentric heart hypertrophy associated with increased expression of ANP, BNP, collagen I and III and fibronectin | Rosiglitazone induced cardiac hypertrophy via the mTOR pathway | [16] |
Reduced heart rate and increased stroke volume | ||||
Increased heart glycogen content, myofibrillar protein content and turnover | ||||
Reduced glycogen phosphorylase expression and activity | ||||
Meta-analysis in T2DM (n = 15 565, control = 12 282) | Received rosiglitazone more than 24 wk | Increased the risk of myocardial infarction | Rosiglitazone increased in the risk of myocardial infarction and borderline increased in risk of cardiovascular death | [11] |
Increased cardiovascular death incidence | ||||
RECORD study (n = 4447) | Received rosiglitazone with mean follow-up time of 3.75 yr | Increased the risk of heart failure | Rosiglitazone increased risk of heart failure, but did not increase the risk of cardiovascular death or all cause mortality | [18] |
RECORD study (n = 4447) | Received rosiglitazone with mean follow-up time of 5.5 yr | Increased the risk of heart failure | Rosiglitazone increased risk of heart failure | [65] |
Suggestion of contraindication for rosiglitazone to be used in patients developing symptomatic heart failure | ||||
Case-control analysis of a retrospective cohort study (n = 159 026) | Treated with TZDs at least 1 yr | Increased risk of heart failure | Rosiglitazone was associated with risk of heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, and mortality | [19] |
Increased mortality | ||||
Increased risk of acute myocardial infarction | ||||
Retrospective, double-blind, randomized clinical studies with rosiglitazone (n = 14 237) | Received rosiglitazone 24-52 wk | Increased heart failure incidence | Rosiglitazone increased the risk of heart failure and myocardial infarction | [13] |
Increased events of myocardial ischemia | ||||
A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (n = 6421, control = 7870) | Received rosiglitazone at least 12 mo | Increased risk of myocardial infarction and heart failure | Rosiglitazone increased risk of myocardial infarction and heart failure, without increased risk of cardiovascular mortality | [23] |
No increased risk of cardiovascular mortality |
I/R: Ischemia/reperfusion; PPAR: Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor; T2DM: Type 2 diabetes mellitus; RECORD: Rosiglitazone Evaluated for Cardiac Outcomes and Regulation of Glycaemia in Diabetes; ANP: Atrial natriuretic peptide; BNP: B-type natriuretic peptide; ERK: Extracellular signal-regulated kinase; TZD: Thiazolidinedione; mTOR: Mammalian Target of Rapamycin pathway
Rosiglitazone treatment has been shown to induce apoptotic cell death in cultured vascular smooth muscle cell by increasing caspase 3 activity and the cytoplasmic histone-associated DNA fragmentation via the proapototic extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2-independent pathway[17]. Likewise, in an in vivo I/R injury model, it has been demonstrated that rosiglitazone therapy for 8 wk in non-diabetic rats with MI did not reduce either LV infarct size or LV hypertrophy, and increased mortality rate after I/R injury[21]. These findings suggested that rosiglitazone did not have cardioprotective effects in myocardial I/R injury. Furthermore, rosiglitazone treatment has been shown to increase cardiac phosphorylation of the p38MAPK signaling pathway[15], suggesting that rosiglitazone could facilitate cardiomyocyte apoptosis. In addition, rosiglitazone has been shown to be associated with an increased incidence of cardiac hypertrophy due to the increased expression of atrial natriuretic peptide, B-type natriuretic peptide, collagen I and III and fibronectin[16], leading to cardiac hypertrophy. The deterioration in cardiac function was also found in mice and rats when treated with rosiglitazone[12,24].
In a large animal model, which is more similar to a human, a recent study in swine has demonstrated that intravenous administration of rosiglitazone at clinically relevant doses attenuated epicardial monophasic action potential shortening during ischemia, possibly via blockade of cardiac ATP-sensitive potassium channels, and increased the propensity for ventricular fibrillation[20].
Growing evidence from recent clinical trials suggest that rosiglitazone could have serious harmful effects on the cardiovascular system[11,13,14,18,19,22,23,65]. The meta-analysis by Nissen et al[11] was the first report raising concerns about the cardiovascular safety profile of rosiglitazone. In a meta-analysis, Nissen et al[11] demonstrated that T2DM patients who received rosiglitazone treatment had a significantly increased risk of MI, heart failure and cardiovascular mortality. Although the method and statistical analysis used in this study have been criticized[14,52,66], the subsequent meta-analyses showed similar concerns regarding MI and heart failure, but not cardiovascular mortality[23,52,65].
Lipscombe et al[19] also demonstrated that rosiglitazone therapy in patients with T2DM was associated with a significantly increased risk of congestive heart failure, acute MI, and death. Similarly, results from a meta-analysis demonstrated that rosiglitazone treatment for at least 12 mo was associated with a significantly increased risk of MI and heart failure[23]. A retrospective analysis also suggested that rosiglitazone may increase the risk of heart failure[13]. These data from the clinical trials and meta-analysis in recent years strongly indicated that rosiglitazone could have adverse effects on the cardiovascular outcome due to increased risk of MI and heart failure, resulting in increased mortality in patients treated over a long period with rosiglitazone[14,18,22,23]. A meta-analysis demonstrated that patients treated with both rosiglitazone and pioglitazone had a 1.7-fold increase in risk of congestive heart failure with a slightly greater increase in risk with rosiglitazone than with pioglitazone (1.3-fold)[67].
The association between TZDs and heart failure is well recognized as a class effect. An increased plasma volume rather than direct effects on cardiac function is thought to be the mechanism responsible for heart failure[12]. Fluid retention is mediated through increased sodium reabsorption of the renal PPARγ-dependent pathway in the collecting tubules[68].
Unlike the mechanism responsible for heart failure, the mechanism of increased MI risk of rosiglitazone is still controversial. An unfavorable effect of the lipid profile has been proposed, in which rosiglitazone increases low density lipoprotein cholesterol to a greater extent than pioglitazone, and decreases the triglyceride level to a smaller extent than pioglitazone[69].
DISCREPANCY IN FINDINGS FROM ROSIGLITAZONE USE
As summarized in Table 1 for the beneficial effects and Table 2 for the adverse effects of rosiglitazone, these controversial reports are still debated. Although each side for and against the use of rosiglitazone has its own supporting documentation, the growing number of reports of serious adverse cardiovascular effects cannot be taken lightly. It is possible that the controversy on the cardiovascular effects of rosiglitazone could be due to differences in species which could have different drug metabolism, different experimental models, different drug administration methods as well as different time intervals of drug treatment which relates to the effects of the drug. The differences in patients’ clinical characteristics may also contribute to the differences in outcomes, in which older patients with preexisting cardiovascular disease are more likely to have serious cardiovascular events.
Regardless of this controversy, since evidence from clinical reports indicated potential cardiovascular risks of rosiglitazone, the European Medicines Agency suggested that the anti-diabetes drug rosiglitazone (Avandia®) should be suspended from the EU market due to its excessive cardiovascular risk[61,70]. As a result, rosiglitazone has been withdrawn from the EU market[61]. However, rosiglitazone is still available in the US but remains under close monitoring from the US Food and Drug Administration[61-63,71].
CONCLUSION
Rosiglitazone is a potent agent in the treatment of hyperglycemia in patients with T2DM because it is an insulin sensitizer and improves glucose uptake. Despite previous reports on its beneficial effects, growing evidence indicates that rosiglitazone increases cardiovascular risks in patients taking this drug. Although this drug has been withdrawn from the EU market, it is still can be used elsewhere. It is important that future large clinical trials should be done to evaluate the definitive cardiovascular outcome of the drug and the interplay between rosiglitazone and other available anti-hyperglycemic agents. In addition, large meta-analyses are also essential and must be carefully interpreted in order to elucidate the effects of rosiglitazone on cardiovascular risks and outcomes.
Footnotes
Peer reviewer: Antigone Lazou, Professor of Physiology, Lab of Animal Physiology, Sch of Biology,Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki 54124, Greece
Supported by Grants from the Thailand Research Fund RTA 5280006 (NC), BRG (SC), MRG5280169 (AP) and the Commission of Higher Education Thailand (SP, NC)
S- Editor Cheng JX L- Editor Cant MR E- Editor Zheng XM
References
- 1.Quinn CE, Hamilton PK, Lockhart CJ, McVeigh GE. Thiazolidinediones: effects on insulin resistance and the cardiovascular system. Br J Pharmacol. 2008;153:636–645. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0707452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes--2008. Diabetes Care. 2008;31 Suppl 1:S12–S54. doi: 10.2337/dc08-S012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Jay MA, Ren J. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) in metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Curr Diabetes Rev. 2007;3:33–39. doi: 10.2174/157339907779802067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Dumasia R, Eagle KA, Kline-Rogers E, May N, Cho L, Mukherjee D. Role of PPAR- gamma agonist thiazolidinediones in treatment of pre-diabetic and diabetic individuals: a cardiovascular perspective. Curr Drug Targets Cardiovasc Haematol Disord. 2005;5:377–386. doi: 10.2174/156800605774370362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Haffner SM, Lehto S, Rönnemaa T, Pyörälä K, Laakso M. Mortality from coronary heart disease in subjects with type 2 diabetes and in nondiabetic subjects with and without prior myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:229–234. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199807233390404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Huang PL. Unraveling the links between diabetes, obesity, and cardiovascular disease. Circ Res. 2005;96:1129–1131. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000170705.56583.45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Rosamond W, Flegal K, Furie K, Go A, Greenlund K, Haase N, Hailpern SM, Ho M, Howard V, Kissela B, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics--2008 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation. 2008;117:e25–146. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.187998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Timmer JR, Ottervanger JP, Thomas K, Hoorntje JC, de Boer MJ, Suryapranata H, Zijlstra F. Long-term, cause-specific mortality after myocardial infarction in diabetes. Eur Heart J. 2004;25:926–931. doi: 10.1016/j.ehj.2004.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Day C. Thiazolidinediones: a new class of antidiabetic drugs. Diabet Med. 1999;16:179–192. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-5491.1999.00023.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Guo L, Tabrizchi R. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma as a drug target in the pathogenesis of insulin resistance. Pharmacol Ther. 2006;111:145–173. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2005.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Nissen SE, Wolski K. Effect of rosiglitazone on the risk of myocardial infarction and death from cardiovascular causes. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:2457–2471. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa072761. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Blasi ER, Heyen J, Hemkens M, McHarg A, Ecelbarger CM, Tiwari S. Effects of Chronic PPAR-Agonist Treatment on Cardiac Structure and Function, Blood Pressure, and Kidney in Healthy Sprague-Dawley Rats. PPAR Res. 2009;2009:237865. doi: 10.1155/2009/237865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Cobitz A, Zambanini A, Sowell M, Heise M, Louridas B, McMorn S, Semigran M, Koch G. A retrospective evaluation of congestive heart failure and myocardial ischemia events in 14,237 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus enrolled in 42 short-term, double-blind, randomized clinical studies with rosiglitazone. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2008;17:769–781. doi: 10.1002/pds.1615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Diamond GA, Bax L, Kaul S. Uncertain effects of rosiglitazone on the risk for myocardial infarction and cardiovascular death. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147:578–581. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-8-200710160-00182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Duan SZ, Ivashchenko CY, Russell MW, Milstone DS, Mortensen RM. Cardiomyocyte-specific knockout and agonist of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma both induce cardiac hypertrophy in mice. Circ Res. 2005;97:372–379. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000179226.34112.6d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Festuccia WT, Laplante M, Brûlé S, Houde VP, Achouba A, Lachance D, Pedrosa ML, Silva ME, Guerra-Sá R, Couet J, et al. Rosiglitazone-induced heart remodelling is associated with enhanced turnover of myofibrillar protein and mTOR activation. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2009;47:85–95. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2009.04.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Gouni-Berthold I, Berthold HK, Weber AA, Ko Y, Seul C, Vetter H, Sachinidis A. Troglitazone and rosiglitazone induce apoptosis of vascular smooth muscle cells through an extracellular signal-regulated kinase-independent pathway. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2001;363:215–221. doi: 10.1007/s002100000352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Home PD, Pocock SJ, Beck-Nielsen H, Gomis R, Hanefeld M, Jones NP, Komajda M, McMurray JJ. Rosiglitazone evaluated for cardiovascular outcomes--an interim analysis. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:28–38. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa073394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lipscombe LL, Gomes T, Lévesque LE, Hux JE, Juurlink DN, Alter DA. Thiazolidinediones and cardiovascular outcomes in older patients with diabetes. JAMA. 2007;298:2634–2643. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.22.2634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lu L, Reiter MJ, Xu Y, Chicco A, Greyson CR, Schwartz GG. Thiazolidinedione drugs block cardiac KATP channels and may increase propensity for ischaemic ventricular fibrillation in pigs. Diabetologia. 2008;51:675–685. doi: 10.1007/s00125-008-0924-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lygate CA, Hulbert K, Monfared M, Cole MA, Clarke K, Neubauer S. The PPARgamma-activator rosiglitazone does not alter remodeling but increases mortality in rats post-myocardial infarction. Cardiovasc Res. 2003;58:632–637. doi: 10.1016/s0008-6363(03)00289-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Psaty BM, Furberg CD. The record on rosiglitazone and the risk of myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:67–69. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe078116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Singh S, Loke YK, Furberg CD. Long-term risk of cardiovascular events with rosiglitazone: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2007;298:1189–1195. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.10.1189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Son NH, Park TS, Yamashita H, Yokoyama M, Huggins LA, Okajima K, Homma S, Szabolcs MJ, Huang LS, Goldberg IJ. Cardiomyocyte expression of PPARgamma leads to cardiac dysfunction in mice. J Clin Invest. 2007;117:2791–2801. doi: 10.1172/JCI30335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Xu Y, Gen M, Lu L, Fox J, Weiss SO, Brown RD, Perlov D, Ahmad H, Zhu P, Greyson C, et al. PPAR-gamma activation fails to provide myocardial protection in ischemia and reperfusion in pigs. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2005;288:H1314–H1323. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00618.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Yue TL, Bao W, Gu JL, Cui J, Tao L, Ma XL, Ohlstein EH, Jucker BM. Rosiglitazone treatment in Zucker diabetic Fatty rats is associated with ameliorated cardiac insulin resistance and protection from ischemia/reperfusion-induced myocardial injury. Diabetes. 2005;54:554–562. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.54.2.554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Asakawa M, Takano H, Nagai T, Uozumi H, Hasegawa H, Kubota N, Saito T, Masuda Y, Kadowaki T, Komuro I. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma plays a critical role in inhibition of cardiac hypertrophy in vitro and in vivo. Circulation. 2002;105:1240–1246. doi: 10.1161/hc1002.105225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Bagi Z, Koller A, Kaley G. PPARgamma activation, by reducing oxidative stress, increases NO bioavailability in coronary arterioles of mice with Type 2 diabetes. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2004;286:H742–H748. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00718.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Bao Y, Li R, Jiang J, Cai B, Gao J, Le K, Zhang F, Chen S, Liu P. Activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma inhibits endothelin-1-induced cardiac hypertrophy via the calcineurin/NFAT signaling pathway. Mol Cell Biochem. 2008;317:189–196. doi: 10.1007/s11010-008-9848-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Bell D, McDermott BJ. Effects of rosiglitazone and interactions with growth-regulating factors in ventricular cell hypertrophy. Eur J Pharmacol. 2005;508:69–76. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2004.12.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Diep QN, El Mabrouk M, Cohn JS, Endemann D, Amiri F, Virdis A, Neves MF, Schiffrin EL. Structure, endothelial function, cell growth, and inflammation in blood vessels of angiotensin II-infused rats: role of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma. Circulation. 2002;105:2296–2302. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000016049.86468.23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Geng DF, Wu W, Jin DM, Wang JF, Wu YM. Effect of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma ligand. Rosiglitazone on left ventricular remodeling in rats with myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiol. 2006;113:86–91. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2006.03.060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Graham DJ, Ouellet-Hellstrom R, MaCurdy TE, Ali F, Sholley C, Worrall C, Kelman JA. Risk of acute myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, and death in elderly Medicare patients treated with rosiglitazone or pioglitazone. JAMA. 2010;304:411–418. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.920. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Khandoudi N, Delerive P, Berrebi-Bertrand I, Buckingham RE, Staels B, Bril A. Rosiglitazone, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma, inhibits the Jun NH(2)-terminal kinase/activating protein 1 pathway and protects the heart from ischemia/reperfusion injury. Diabetes. 2002;51:1507–1514. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.51.5.1507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kilter H, Werner M, Roggia C, Reil JC, Schäfers HJ, Kintscher U, Böhm M. The PPAR-gamma agonist rosiglitazone facilitates Akt rephosphorylation and inhibits apoptosis in cardiomyocytes during hypoxia/reoxygenation. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2009;11:1060–1067. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2009.01097.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Lautamäki R, Airaksinen KE, Seppänen M, Toikka J, Luotolahti M, Ball E, Borra R, Härkönen R, Iozzo P, Stewart M, et al. Rosiglitazone improves myocardial glucose uptake in patients with type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease: a 16-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Diabetes. 2005;54:2787–2794. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.54.9.2787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Li J, Liu NF, Wei Q. Effect of rosiglitazone on cardiac fibroblast proliferation, nitric oxide production and connective tissue growth factor expression induced by advanced glycation end-products. J Int Med Res. 2008;36:329–335. doi: 10.1177/147323000803600216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Liu HR, Tao L, Gao E, Lopez BL, Christopher TA, Willette RN, Ohlstein EH, Yue TL, Ma XL. Anti-apoptotic effects of rosiglitazone in hypercholesterolemic rabbits subjected to myocardial ischemia and reperfusion. Cardiovasc Res. 2004;62:135–144. doi: 10.1016/j.cardiores.2003.12.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Al-Attas OS, Al-Daghri NM, Al-Rubeaan K, da Silva NF, Sabico SL, Kumar S, McTernan PG, Harte AL. Changes in endotoxin levels in T2DM subjects on anti-diabetic therapies. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2009;8:20. doi: 10.1186/1475-2840-8-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Mersmann J, Tran N, Zacharowski PA, Grotemeyer D, Zacharowski K. Rosiglitazone is cardioprotective in a murine model of myocardial I/R. Shock. 2008;30:64–68. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0b013e31815dbdc3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Molavi B, Chen J, Mehta JL. Cardioprotective effects of rosiglitazone are associated with selective overexpression of type 2 angiotensin receptors and inhibition of p42/44 MAPK. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2006;291:H687–H693. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00926.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Ren Y, Sun C, Sun Y, Tan H, Wu Y, Cui B, Wu Z. PPAR gamma protects cardiomyocytes against oxidative stress and apoptosis via Bcl-2 upregulation. Vascul Pharmacol. 2009;51:169–174. doi: 10.1016/j.vph.2009.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Shah RD, Gonzales F, Golez E, Augustin D, Caudillo S, Abbott A, Morello J, McDonough PM, Paolini PJ, Shubeita HE. The antidiabetic agent rosiglitazone upregulates SERCA2 and enhances TNF-alpha- and LPS-induced NF-kappaB-dependent transcription and TNF-alpha-induced IL-6 secretion in ventricular myocytes. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2005;15:41–50. doi: 10.1159/000083637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Sidell RJ, Cole MA, Draper NJ, Desrois M, Buckingham RE, Clarke K. Thiazolidinedione treatment normalizes insulin resistance and ischemic injury in the zucker Fatty rat heart. Diabetes. 2002;51:1110–1117. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.51.4.1110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Walker AB, Chattington PD, Buckingham RE, Williams G. The thiazolidinedione rosiglitazone (BRL-49653) lowers blood pressure and protects against impairment of endothelial function in Zucker fatty rats. Diabetes. 1999;48:1448–1453. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.48.7.1448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Yue Tl TL, Chen J, Bao W, Narayanan PK, Bril A, Jiang W, Lysko PG, Gu JL, Boyce R, Zimmerman DM, et al. In vivo myocardial protection from ischemia/reperfusion injury by the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma agonist rosiglitazone. Circulation. 2001;104:2588–2594. doi: 10.1161/hc4601.099403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Gerstein HC, Yusuf S, Bosch J, Pogue J, Sheridan P, Dinccag N, Hanefeld M, Hoogwerf B, Laakso M, Mohan V, et al. Effect of rosiglitazone on the frequency of diabetes in patients with impaired glucose tolerance or impaired fasting glucose: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2006;368:1096–1105. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69420-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Gonon AT, Bulhak A, Labruto F, Sjöquist PO, Pernow J. Cardioprotection mediated by rosiglitazone, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma ligand, in relation to nitric oxide. Basic Res Cardiol. 2007;102:80–89. doi: 10.1007/s00395-006-0613-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Haffner SM, Greenberg AS, Weston WM, Chen H, Williams K, Freed MI. Effect of rosiglitazone treatment on nontraditional markers of cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Circulation. 2002;106:679–684. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000025403.20953.23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.How OJ, Larsen TS, Hafstad AD, Khalid A, Myhre ES, Murray AJ, Boardman NT, Cole M, Clarke K, Severson DL, et al. Rosiglitazone treatment improves cardiac efficiency in hearts from diabetic mice. Arch Physiol Biochem. 2007;113:211–220. doi: 10.1080/13813450701783281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Kelly AS, Thelen AM, Kaiser DR, Gonzalez-Campoy JM, Bank AJ. Rosiglitazone improves endothelial function and inflammation but not asymmetric dimethylarginine or oxidative stress in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Vasc Med. 2007;12:311–318. doi: 10.1177/1358863X07084200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Mannucci E, Monami M, Di Bari M, Lamanna C, Gori F, Gensini GF, Marchionni N. Cardiac safety profile of rosiglitazone: a comprehensive meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Int J Cardiol. 2010;143:135–140. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2009.01.064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Nilsson PM, Hedblad B, Donaldson J, Berglund G. Rosiglitazone reduces office and diastolic ambulatory blood pressure following 1-year treatment in non-diabetic subjects with insulin resistance. Blood Press. 2007;16:95–100. doi: 10.1080/08037050701396652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Ren L, Li Y, Li Y, Tang R, Hu D, Sheng Z, Liu N. The inhibitory effects of rosiglitazone on cardiac hypertrophy through modulating the renin-angiotensin system in diet-induced hypercholesterolemic rats. Cell Biochem Funct. 2010;28:58–65. doi: 10.1002/cbf.1621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Reynolds LR, Konz EC, Frederich RC, Anderson JW. Rosiglitazone amplifies the benefits of lifestyle intervention measures in long-standing type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2002;4:270–275. doi: 10.1046/j.1463-1326.2002.00207.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Sidhu JS, Cowan D, Kaski JC. The effects of rosiglitazone, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma agonist, on markers of endothelial cell activation, C-reactive protein, and fibrinogen levels in non-diabetic coronary artery disease patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42:1757–1763. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Tao L, Wang Y, Gao E, Zhang H, Yuan Y, Lau WB, Chan L, Koch WJ, Ma XL. Adiponectin: an indispensable molecule in rosiglitazone cardioprotection following myocardial infarction. Circ Res. 2010;106:409–417. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.109.211797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Yu J, Jin N, Wang G, Zhang F, Mao J, Wang X. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma agonist improves arterial stiffness in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease. Metabolism. 2007;56:1396–1401. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2007.05.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Zhang XJ, Xiong ZB, Tang AL, Ma H, Ma YD, Wu JG, Dong YG. Rosiglitazone-induced myocardial protection against ischaemia-reperfusion injury is mediated via a phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt-dependent pathway. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2010;37:156–161. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1681.2009.05232.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Sauer WH, Cappola AR, Berlin JA, Kimmel SE. Insulin sensitizing pharmacotherapy for prevention of myocardial infarction in patients with diabetes mellitus. Am J Cardiol. 2006;97:651–654. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.09.106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.European Medicines Agency. European Medicines Agency recommends suspension of Avandia, Avandamet and Avaglim. Press release, September 23, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- 62.The US Food and Drug Administration. Decision on continued marketing of rosiglitazone (Avandia, Avandamet, Avandaryl). September 22, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- 63.The US Food and Drug Administration. FDA significantly restricts access to the diabetes drug Avandia. September 23, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- 64.Choi D, Kim SK, Choi SH, Ko YG, Ahn CW, Jang Y, Lim SK, Lee HC, Cha BS. Preventative effects of rosiglitazone on restenosis after coronary stent implantation in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:2654–2660. doi: 10.2337/diacare.27.11.2654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Komajda M, McMurray JJ, Beck-Nielsen H, Gomis R, Hanefeld M, Pocock SJ, Curtis PS, Jones NP, Home PD. Heart failure events with rosiglitazone in type 2 diabetes: data from the RECORD clinical trial. Eur Heart J. 2010;31:824–831. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Bilous RW. Rosiglitazone and myocardial infarction: cause for concern or misleading meta-analysis? Diabet Med. 2007;24:931–933. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2007.02259.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Lago RM, Singh PP, Nesto RW. Congestive heart failure and cardiovascular death in patients with prediabetes and type 2 diabetes given thiazolidinediones: a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials. Lancet. 2007;370:1129–1136. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61514-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Zhang H, Zhang A, Kohan DE, Nelson RD, Gonzalez FJ, Yang T. Collecting duct-specific deletion of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma blocks thiazolidinedione-induced fluid retention. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:9406–9411. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0501744102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Goldberg RB, Kendall DM, Deeg MA, Buse JB, Zagar AJ, Pinaire JA, Tan MH, Khan MA, Perez AT, Jacober SJ. A comparison of lipid and glycemic effects of pioglitazone and rosiglitazone in patients with type 2 diabetes and dyslipidemia. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:1547–1554. doi: 10.2337/diacare.28.7.1547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Blind E, Dunder K, de Graeff PA, Abadie E. Rosiglitazone: a European regulatory perspective. Diabetologia. 2011;54:213–218. doi: 10.1007/s00125-010-1992-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Woodcock J, Sharfstein JM, Hamburg M. Regulatory action on rosiglitazone by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:1489–1491. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1010788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]