Osteoporosis has been found among the oldest existing skeletons from ancient Egypt, the Middle East, and Europe [1, 3, 6, 7]. However, a recognition and understanding of the condition likely began in the first half of the 19th Century, when, in 1833, the French pathologist, Jean Martin Lobstein described the condition as one with holes in the bone associated with fragility [4, 5] and used two terms in his paper: “osteoporose” and “osteopsathyrose” (the latter with obscure meaning). He commented on an autopsy of a “man of sixty years in which almost all the bones began to soften at the age of eighteen years and then they degenerated into tumors. Yet these same spongy bones resumed their original strength when all were united. A review of the corpse suggested the swelling was due to a bone expansion of the reticular substance therefore osteoporosis.”1 Regardless of the nature of the condition, Lobstein recognized the expansion of the marrow spaces at the expense of the trabecular bone. The term “osteoporosis” likely spread reasonably rapidly, as it is described in a German dictionary of medical terms in 1839 [9].
The predilection for osteoporosis and its relationship to fractures, particularly in elderly women, was well recognized by the late 1800s. Bauer remarked on the work of Bruns [2]: ‘‘Thus, in 1882, the general pattern of the age and the sex specific incidence of various types of fractures was formulated clearly by Bruns in an impressive review of fracture epidemiology.’’ Less well recognized, however, was the occurrence in males, albeit with lower frequency. In the article highlighted this month, Vincent and Urist [8] studied a sample of institutionalized males without regard to symptoms and found a higher incidence of osteoporosis than anticipated. They commented, “Osteoporosis of the degree previously found in 26 per cent of institutionalized women with an average age of 85, and 76 per cent of women with fracture of the hip, was observed in only 5 per cent of males. The over-all incidence of both severe and moderate osteoporosis in the male was 18% (Table 1).” Interestingly, they found the incidence of symptomatic spinal osteoporosis (with vertebral fractures) “did not increase after age 65 (Table 4).” They further commented, “The incidence of osteoporosis in the 2 sexes is much closer than that indicated by previous studies. When consideration is given to the much greater age in the female group…the incidence in the 2 sexes becomes even closer.” “Asymptomatic patients represent an ideal group for the study of osteoporosis in the 2 sexes and constitute a natural selection of cases in earlier stages of the disorder.”
Table 1.
Number of patients | Degree of osteoporosis | |
---|---|---|
Males | Females | |
6 | 2 | Expanded disks |
7 | 4 | 1 collapsed vertebra + expanded disks |
3 | 18 | 2–5 collapsed vertebrae + expanded disks |
2 | 4 | 5–8 collapsed vertebrae + expanded disks |
(Reprinted with permission and © Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, from Vincent PJ, Urist MR. The appearance of osteoporosis in ambulatory institutionalized males. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1961;19:245–251.)
Table 4.
Decade | Number of cases |
---|---|
3rd | 2 |
4th | 21 |
5th | 32 |
6th | 29 |
7th | 15 |
8th | 2 |
(Reprinted with permission and © Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, from Vincent PJ, Urist MR. The appearance of osteoporosis in ambulatory institutionalized males. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1961;19:245–251.)
Perhaps not surprisingly, the apparent differential in occurrence of osteoporosis between the sexes depended upon the population sampled and, in effect, the questions being raised. Clearly, women are more affected, in part because they live longer and in part because they develop osteoporosis earlier than males [2]. Vincent and Urist contributed to the debate by looking at the issues from a different point of view.
Footnotes
Editors Note: I have taken some liberty with the translation to render into contemporary English based on what I presume to be his intent.
References
- 1.Armelagos GJ. Disease in ancient Nubia. Science. 1969;163:255–259. doi: 10.1126/science.163.3864.255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bauer GCH. Epidemiology of fracture in aged persons: a preliminary investigation in fracture etiology. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1960;17:219–225. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1312-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Dequeker J, Ortner DJ, Stix AI, Cheng XG, Brys P, Boonen S. Hip fracture and osteoporosis in a XIIth Dynasty female skeleton from Lisht, upper Egypt. J Bone Miner Res. 1997;12:881–888. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.1997.12.6.881. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lobstein JF. Traité d’anatomie Pathologique. Paris: Chez F. G. Levrault; 1833. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lobstein JF. Von der Knochenbrüchigkeit oder Osteopsathyose. ed. Lehrbuch der pathologischen Anatomie. Stuttgart: Thieme; 1835:179.
- 6.Mays SA. Age-related cortical bone loss in women from a 3rd-4th century AD population from England. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2006;129:518–528. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.20365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ortner DJ. Disease and mortality in the Early Bronze Age people of Bab edh-Dhra, Jordan. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1979;51:589–597. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330510411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Vincent PJ, Urist MR. The appearance of osteoporosis in ambulatory institutionalized males. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1961;19:245–252. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-1876-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Walther W, Jaeger M, Radius J. Handwörterbuch der gesammten Chirurgie und Augenheilkunde. Leipzig: Verlag von Gebhard und Reisland; 1839. [Google Scholar]