Skip to main content
PMC home page
BMC Molecular Biology logoLink to BMC Molecular Biology
. 2011 May 24;12:25. doi: 10.1186/1471-2199-12-25

Functional characterization of the ER stress induced X-box-binding protein-1 (Xbp-1) in the porcine system

Jin-Yu Zhang 1,2,#, Kyu-Sun Lee 1,#, Ji-Su Kim 3, Bong-Seok Song 3, Dong-Il Jin 2, Deog-Bon Koo 4,✉, Kweon Yu 1,✉
PMCID: PMC3112107  PMID: 21605464

Abstract

Background

The unfolded protein response (UPR) is an evolutionary conserved adaptive reaction for increasing cell survival under endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress conditions. X-box-binding protein-1 (Xbp1) is a key transcription factor of UPR that activates genes involved in protein folding, secretion, and degradation to restore ER function. The UPR induced by ER stress was extensively studied in diseases linked to protein misfolding and aggregations. However, in the porcine system, genes in the UPR pathway were not investigated. In this study, we isolated and characterized the porcine Xbp1 (pXbp1) gene in ER stress using porcine embryonic fibroblast (PEF) cells and porcine organs. ER stress was induced by the treatment of tunicamycin and cell viability was investigated by the MTT assay. For cloning and analyzing the expression pattern of pXbp1, RT-PCR analysis and Western blot were used. Knock-down of pXbp1 was performed by the siRNA-mediated gene silencing.

Results

We found that the pXbp1 mRNA was the subject of the IRE1α-mediated unconventional splicing by ER stress. Knock-down of pXbp1 enhanced ER stress-mediated cell death in PEF cells. In adult organs, pXbp1 mRNA and protein were expressed and the spliced forms were detected.

Conclusions

It was first found that the UPR mechanisms and the function of pXbp1 in the porcine system. These results indicate that pXbp1 plays an important role during the ER stress response like other animal systems and open a new opportunity for examining the UPR pathway in the porcine model system.

Background

Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is an essential cellular compartment for protein synthesis and maturation [1]. The perturbation of ER functions such as disruption of Ca++ homeostasis, inhibition of protein glycosylation or disulfide bond formation, hypoxia, and bacteria infections results in the accumulation of unfolded or mis-folded proteins in ER lumen. To reduce the excessive mis-folded protein loading, cells trigger unfolded protein response (UPR) including the transient attenuation of protein translation, the degradation of mis-folded proteins, and the induction of molecular chaperones and protein folding enzymes [1]. In severe ER stress, UPR results in cell death through the activation of apoptotic pathways [2].

Three distinct UPR signaling pathways exist in mammalian cells that include ER transmembrane inositol-requiring enzyme 1 (IRE1), PKR-like ER kinase (PERK), and activating transcription factor 6 (ATF6) pwthways [3]. The evolutionary conserved IRE1 in the UPR pathway plays as a Ser/Thr protein kinase and endoribonuclease [4,5]. Upon the activation of IRE1α by ER stress, the endonuclease domain of IRE1 splices the XBP1 mRNA and removes 26 base pairs from the full-length XBP1 mRNA by the unconventional splicing. This event results in the conversion of the premature unspliced XBP1 protein (XBP1u, 267 amino acids) to the spliced XBP1 protein (XBP1s, 371 amino acids) by the frame shift. XBP1s induces a subset of UPR target genes related to protein quality control, ER translocation, glycosylation, and ER/Golgi biogenesis [1,6].

UPR has been intensively studied in various model systems including mice and human cell lines. However, the UPR pathway and its components have not yet been elucidated in the porcine model system. Pigs are an important resource in biomedical research because they are more similar to humans than the rodent model [7,8]. Therefore, pigs have wide implications for studying human diseases such as diabetes obesity, hypertension, and cardiovascular diseases [9-11]. In addition, transgenic pigs are used as the bioreactor for the production of various growth hormones used in human medicine [12]. Organs from cloned pigs produced by the somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) can be used in xenotransplantation [13-15].

In this study, we report the function of pXbp1, the porcine ortholog of the human Xbp1, in ER stress. The unconventional splicing of pXbp1 mRNA is evolutionary conserved. In the RNA interference-mediated pXbp1 knock-down, we found that the pXbp1 participated in ER stress-mediated cell death through the regulation of the target gene expression. We also detected the spliced pXbp1S mRNA and protein in adult organs of pigs.

Results

Tunicamycin induces UPR in PEF cells

Tunicamycin (TM), which inhibits N-linked glycosylation in newly synthesized polypeptide, induces ER stress [16]. We tested whether the treatment of TM triggers ER stress-induced cell death in porcine embryonic fibroblast (PEF) cells. When cells were treated with TM for 24 h, we detected the morphological changes and the reduction of cell numbers (Figure 1A). The effect of TM on ER stress-mediated cell death was also detected by the morphological changes of apoptotic nuclei and the activity of caspase-3 (Additional file 1, Fig. S1). In addition, the cell viability was significantly decreased from 12 h in TM treated cells. The cell death was time and dose-dependent (Figure 1B).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Tunicamycin treatment induced cell death and unfolded protein response in PEF cells. (A) Tunicamycin treatment for 24 h in PEF cells induced cell death compared to the control PEF cells and (B) the cell death was dose-dependent. Data are presented as means ± SEM. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.001. (C) Tunicamycin treatment increased expression of an ER stress marker BiP in the RT-PCR analysis. (D) Three major ER stress sensors IRE1, PERK, and ATF6 were activated after TM treatment. (E) Quantification of the Western blot analysis in (D). Data were presented as means ± SD from three independent experiments.

To access whether ER stress response is activated in PEF cells by the TM treatment, we measured the expression levels of a ER stress marker BiP [17] and the activation of three major ER stress sensors IRE1α, PERK, and ATF6 with the Western blot analysis. BiP protein expression was significantly up-regulated from 3 h (Figure 1C). IRE1α and ATF6 were activated from 3 h and PERK was activated from 6 h after TM treatment (Figure 1D). These results indicate that ER stress induces unfolded protein response in PEF cells.

Cloning and sequence analysis of porcine Xbp1

We focused on the IRE1α-Xbp1 pathway of UPR in this study and cloned the porcine Xbp1 gene (GenBank accession number FJ213449.1) as described in Materials and Methods. Porcine Xbp1 mRNA has two open reading frames (ORF) composed of 792 bp and 1137 bp which are alternatively produced by the IRE1α-mediated unconventional splicing (Figure 2A). Notably, 26 nucleotide sequences, splicing sites by IRE1α, within Xbp1 ORF and its flanking sequence are identical with those of the human Xbp1 sequences. When the secondary structures of pXbp1 sequence around the IRE1α cleavage sites were predicted using CentroidFOLD [18], the consensus cleavage sites were located in the loop-portion (Figure 2B and 2C). The amino acid sequences of the pXBP1 protein show significant homology with hXBP1 including the conserved basic leucine zipper (bZIP) region. The amino acid similarity was 89% between pXBP1 and hXBP1 (Figure 2D). Phylogenetic tree of XBP1 sequences from various organisms was generated using the neighbor-joining method. The phylogenetic tree showed that the pXBP1 is a closer match to the human XBP1 (Accession No. NM_005080, 85% amino acid identity) rather than that of a rat (Accession No. JC4857, 83% amino acid identity) or a mouse (Accession No. NP_038870, 80% amino acid identity) (Figure 2E).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Sequence analysis of pXbp1. (A) After IRE1-mediated splicing, 26 nucleotides were deleted from unspliced pXbp1U mRNA and produced the 378 amino acids spliced pXbp1 protein. Arrow shows the primers used in this study. pXbp1-F1 and pXbp1-R1 were used to amplify the full length of pXbp1 mRNA. pXbp1-SF and pXbp1-SR were used to detect the spliced pXbp1 mRNA. (B) The consensus sequence of the cleavage targets by IRE1α is in gray and the cleavage sites are indicated by arrows. (C) Schematic representation of the cleavage sites with secondary structure were predicted by CentroidFOLD. (D) Amino acid sequence comparisons between the human XBP1 and porcine XBP1 protein using the ClustalW method. Identical amino acid residues are shaded in black and the basic leucine zipper (bZIP) domain is underlined. (E) Phylogenetic trees of XBP1 were generated with the neighbor-joining method.

Unconventional splicing of the porcine Xbp1

To elucidate whether IRE1α-mediated splicing of pXbp1 mRNA was triggered by ER stress like a human Xbp1 mRNA, PEF cells were treated with TM and performed the RT-PCR analysis. The spliced form of pXbp1 product (pXbp1S) was detected in the TM treated cells from 3 h. The spliced pXbp1 mRNA level was significantly increased during ER stress (Figure 3A). In the Western blot analysis, the expression level of the activated pXbp1 protein (Xbp1S) significantly up-regulated by the TM treatment from 3 h which is consistent with the RT-PCR analysis (Figure 3B). These results indicate that pXbp1 mRNA is processed upon ER stress and can be used as a major marker for UPR response in the porcine system.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

ER stress induced the spliced pXbp1 mRNA and active pXbp1 protein. Tunicamycin treatment induced spliced pXbp1 mRNA (A) and active pXbp1 protein (B) from 3 h. β-actin was used as the loading control. (C) Quantification of the Western blot analysis in (B). Data were presented as means ± SD from three independent experiments.

Nuclear localization of pXbp1 and ERAI vector system in PEF cells

XBP1 belongs to a bZIP transcription factor. When cells are challenged with ER stress, activated XBP1 enters into the nucleus for activating its target genes [19]. When we tested the localization of XBP1 in the TM treated PEF cells by the immunostaining, pXBP1 was predominantly localized in the nucleus after 6 h (Figure 4A).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Nuclear localization of pXbp1 and the ERAI vector system. (A) pXbp1 was immunostained with the Xbp1 antibody in the TM treated PEF cells. pXbp1 protein was localized in cytoplasm under the normal condition but was predominantly translocated into the nuclei by the ER stress. (B) Detection of the ER stress-activated indicator (ERAI) by the green fluorescence (green) in the TM treated PEF cells (arrows). DAPI is used for marking the nuclei. (C) In the Western blot analysis with the ant-FLAG antibody, FLAG-tagged XBP1-venus fusion protein was found in PEF cells transfected with ERAI plasmids and treated with TM. The upper bands indicate the XBP1-venus fusion protein (45 kDa). The lower bands indicate the truncated XBP1 (30 kDa).

Recently Iwawaki et al [20] reported the ER stress-activated indicator (ERAI) vector system for monitoring ER stress with the green fluorescence protein (GFP). In the ERAI plasmid, human Xbp-1-Venus fusion construct contains the partial sequence of the human XBP1 and a GFP variant (Venus) sequence. Upon ER stress, 26 nucleotides of human Xbp1 are spliced out and the XBP1-Venus fusion protein is produced. To test whether ERAI works as an indicator for ER stress in the porcine system, we checked the GFP signal in the ERAI transfected PEF cells after TM treatment. We found that 20.5% of total cells showed GFP signal in the TM treated ERAI-PEF cells, not in TM non-treated ERAI-PEF cells (Figure 4B, arrows). This observation was consistent with the results of the Western blot analysis. The band of the XBP-1-venus fusion protein (45 kDa) was very strong under ER stress (Figure 4C). These results suggest that the ERAI system can be used for monitoring the activation of UPR in the porcine system.

Porcine Xbp1 plays a role in ER stress-mediated cell death

To investigate whether pXbp1 is involved in ER stress induced cell death, knock-down experiments were performed with pXbp1 siRNA. pXbp1 knock-down cells expressed only 20% of pXbp1 mRNA compared with the control siRNA transfected cells (Additional file 2, Fig. S2). In addition, we performed the Western blot analysis using the Xbp-1 antibody in pXbp-1 knock-down PEF cells. Active and inactive Xbp-1 proteins were significantly decreased in pXbp1 knock-down cells compared with the control siRNA transfected cells (Additional file 3, Fig. S3). pXbp1 knock-down cells displayed decreased cell viability compared with the control siRNA transfected cells (Figure 5A). To further support the role of pXbp1 in survival during ER stress, we compared the number of apoptotic cells in the control siRNA and pXbp1 siRNA transfected PEF cells by the TUNEL staining. In pXbp1 knock-down cells, TUNEL positive cells increased about 10-fold compared with the control (Additional file 4, Fig. S4). These results indicate that the knock-down of pXbp1 is more sensitive to ER stress-induced apoptosis, which is consistent with the published data in human myeloma cells [21].

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Knock-down of pXbp1 increased ER stress-induced cell death and down-regulated expression of target genes. (A) Cell viability of TM treated PEF cells was decreased by the knock-down of pXbp1 (open square) compared with the control siRNA (square). Data are presented as means ± SEM. *P < 0.05. (B) Knock-down of pXbp1 decreased expression of ERdj4, p58IPK, BiP, CHOP, and GRP94 target genes in the TM treated and non- treated PEF cells. β-actin was used as the loading control.

Xbp1 activates its UPR target genes for maintaining the ER function and suppressing ER stress-induced cell death. The inhibition of Xbp1 activity by the dominant negative Xbp1 or knock-down Xbp1 markedly reduces the expression of Xbp1 dependent UPR target genes [6]. Thus, we investigated the expression of pXbp1 target genes during ER stress response. The knock-down pXbp1 significantly reduced the expression of ERdj4 and p58IPK both in the normal condition and TM treated PEF cells (Figure 5B). In addition, well-known UPR target genes, including BiP, CHOP, and GRP94, were also significantly induced by TM treated PEF cells, but reduced in the pXbp1 knock-down PEF cells (Figure 5B). These results suggest that pXbp1 dependent target gene expression might be required for maintaining cell viability in PEF cells under the ER stress condition.

Porcine XBP1 as a UPR marker in the porcine system

Finally, we assessed the unconventional splicing pattern of pXbp1 as a UPR marker in the porcine system. Xbp1 is essential for development of liver and exocrine organs like the pancreas or salivary gland and holds a crucial role in immune systems and metabolic regulations [22-24]. To investigate expression of pXbp1 in adult porcine organs, we performed the RT-PCR and Western blot analysis with adult organs. Unspliced and spliced pXBP1 mRNA and protein was expressed in liver, spleen, intestine, kidney, and ovary (Figure 6A, B). In the absence of exogenously induced ER stress, the unconventional splicing of pXbp1 takes place in adult tissues. These results support that pXbp1 can be used for monitoring ER stress response and as a specific UPR marker in the porcine system.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Expression of pXbp1 mRNA and protein in adult organs. Unspliced and spliced pXbp1 mRNA (A) and protein (B) was expressed in liver, spleen, intestine, kidney, and ovary.

Discussion

The porcine model system is important to study human diseases because it shares similarities with humans in similar organ sizes, anatomy, and physiology [10]. Comparative genomic analysis showed that porcine genomic sequences are more similar to those of the human than to the genomic sequences of the mouse [25]. The UPR pathway is valuable for cellular homeostasis and animal development. Therefore, investigating the UPR pathway and monitoring ER stress in the model system is important to the study of pathogenic mechanisms that cause human diseases [1,3,26].

The results of this study show the UPR pathway in porcine system. As well as IRE1α-Xbp1 pathway, two ER transmembrane proteins, PERK and ATF6α, play important roles in the mammalian UPR. Upon UPR induction, ATF6α is released by BiP and exported to the Golgi, where it is cleaved by S1P proteases [5,27]. Cleaved ATF6α acts as a transcriptional activator that can increase the expression of ER chaperones and Xbp1 [5]. In this study, we found that three UPR components (IRE1α, PERK, and ATF6α) are activated by ER stress in porcine cells (Figure 1D and 1E). Among these three UPR sensors, IRE1α-Xbp1 pathway plays a central role in ER stress response by the transcriptional regulation of genes involved in ER function. The amino acid sequence comparison and the phylogenetic analysis showed that pXbp1 has a high similarity to human Xbp1. In addition, the consensus sequence (CAGCAC/G) in Xbp1 mRNA of IRE1α target site is conserved between pigs and human (Figure 2). These results suggest that the IRE1α-Xbp1 pathway is evolutionary conserved in mammals.

Conventional splicing is catalyzed by the spliceosome for removing an intron within a primary transcript [28]. In contrast, Xbp1 pre-mRNA is cleaved by IRE1α endonuclease-mediated unconventional splicing and this process is independent of the spliceosome [5,29]. Unconventional splicing of Xbp1 mRNA leads to the production of an active transcription factor and induction of adaptive genes in the mammalian UPR. We showed that pXbp1 was also cleaved by unconventional splicing during ER stress response (Figure 3). Spliced pXbp1 mRNA was detected in the TM treated cells from 3 h and gradually increased until 9 h. In contrast, the protein level of active pXbp1s peaked within 3 h and slightly decreased from 6 h. During ER stress response, activated PERK pathway attenuates global protein translation by phosphorylating the eIF2α [30]. We also detected that active PERK increased from 6 h in the TM treated cells (Figure 1D, E). Therefore, the translation of spliced and active Xbp1 mRNA may be attenuated by the PERK-eIF2α pathway.

In this study, we revealed that pXbp1 suppression is involved ER-mediated cell death through the regulation of target gene expression, such as ERdj4, p58IPK, and BiP. In addition, the ER stress-induced expression of CHOP, a pro-apoptotic transcription factor, was also reduced in the pXbp1 knockdown cell (Figure 5). The CHOP promoter contains ER stress response element (ERSE) and amino-acid-regulatory element (AARE). All three UPR transcription factors, ATF4, ATF6 and XBP1, can bind these promoter regions and regulate the transcription of CHOP [31]. The expression of CHOP is reduced in Xbp1 knockout MEF cell line [6] and in pXbp1 knock-down porcine cells (Figure 5). These results indicate that pXbp-1 may be involved in the regulation of CHOP expression. However, PERK-ATF4 and ATF6α are known as dominant regulators for the CHOP expression rather than XBP1 [32,33] and all three UPR pathways are required for the maximal induction of CHOP [34].

Studies in the mouse model show that the IRE1α-XBP1 pathway is essential for the liver and heart development and the function of secretion in pancreatic exocrine and plasma cells [22-24,35]. The embryonic fibroblasts from XBP1-deficient mouse show defects in adipogenesis [36]. We have investigated expression of the inactive and active isoforms of pXBP1 in various porcine tissues. While unspliced pXbp1 was expressed in all examined tissues, spliced pXbp1 was strongly expressed in liver and kidney (Figure 6A). Furthermore, active pXbp1s protein was detected in all examined tissues except heart (Figure 6B). This result indicates that pXbp1 plays a role in porcine tissues like other animals.

Conclusion

In this study, we show that unconventional splicing of pXbp1 mRNA is evolutionary conserved and pXbp1 is involved in ER-stress mediated apoptosis. In the adult porcine organs, spliced pXbp1 was expressed. These results suggest that pXbp1 can be used to monitor physiological and pathological ER stress in the porcine model system.

Methods

Cell culture and ER stress condition

Porcine embryo fibroblast (PEF) cells derived from 25-26 days of fetal pigs were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium supplemented with 10% heat inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS), 1% NEAA, 0.1% Gentamicine. PEF cells were maintained at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2. In order to induce ER stress, PEF cells seeded in a 6-well dish were treated with Tunicamycin (TM, 2 μg/ml in DMSO) and harvested at 3 h, 6 h, and 9 h. Animal care and all experiments were conducted in accordance with KRIBB Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and all experiments were approved by the institutional review board (KRIBB Institutional animal care and use committee/KRIBB-IACUC).

Cell viability assay

Cell viability was determined by 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay using the CellTiter 96 Aqueous One kit (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Cloning of the porcine Xbp1 cDNA and phylogenetic analysis

To isolate porcine Xbp1, we searched the GenBank EST database with the BLAST (tblastn) program using the human XBP1 (GenBank accession number NM_005080) as the query sequence. LVRM100070G04, a Sus scrofa mRNA clone expressed in liver (GenBank accession number AK233029.1), showed high homology with the human XBP1 mRNA sequence. Oligonucleotide primers (pXBP1-F1, pXBP1-R1) were designed to clone the complete sequence of porcine Xbp1 mRNA (Figure 2A; Additional file 5, Table S1). PCR reaction was prepared with porcine cDNA generated from PEF cells, 1 pM of each primer, and 1X AccuPower® PCR premix (Bioneer, Daejeon, Korea). PCR Amplification was performed with 30 cycles of 94°C for 30 sec, 58°C for 30 sec, and 72°C for 2 min using GeneAmp PCR system 9700 (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The cloned 1.7 kb PCR product was subcloned into the pGEM-T easy vector (Promega, Madison, WI) and was sequenced using an ABI automated sequencer (Applied Biosystem, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Homology searches for the cloned cDNA sequence and deduced amino acid sequences were performed by BLAST programs. Analysis of the primary structure of predicted proteins were performed by the SMART (Simple Modular Architecture Research Tool) at ExPASy Proteomics Server. Phylogenetic analysis was performed using ClustalW (http://www.ch.embnet.org). GenBank accession numbers for human XBP1: NM_002256, mouse Xpb-1: NM_178260, rat Xpb-1: NM_181692; bovine Xpb-1: XM_867473, Xenopus BK006297; zebrafish, EF690279; Drosophila, EF690279; C. elegans EF690279.

RNA preparation and reverse transcription-PCR analysis

The total RNA of PEF cells were extracted with Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and were further purified by On-Column RNase-free DNase digestion (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) to remove possible genomic DNA contamination. cDNA was synthesized by using Superscript II® Reverse Transcription system (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). For RT-PCR, AccuPower® PCR premix (Bioneer, Daejeon Korea) was used with the set of primers. Primer sequences are in Additional file 5 (Table S1). Amplification conditions were as follows: a single cycle of 94°C for 5 min followed by 30 cycles of 94°C for 30s, 58°C for 30s, and 72°C for 30s, and the final single cycle of 72°C extension for 7 min. PCR products were separated by electrophoresis in the 2% agarose gel.

Immunostaining

PEF cells were cultured on a gelatin-coated coverslip of up to 40% confluence. Cells were fixed in PBS contained 4% (w/v) formaldehyde for 30 min at room temperature (RT) and washed in PBS with 0.05% Tween 20 (PBST). After the incubation for 30 min in PBS containing 1% Triton X-100, the samples were blocked in PBST with 2% BSA for 1 h at RT, and incubated for 1.5 h at 37°C with a rabbit anti-Xbp1 antibody (1:200, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA). Then, the cells were washed in PBST, incubated with a secondary antibody (1:200) for 1 h at 37°C, washed in PBST for 15 min four times, and mounted on Poly-prepslide glass (Sigma Aldrish, MO, USA) with a mounting media containing DAPI (Vectashield; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA). Samples were observed with a Karl Zeiss Axiovert 200 M fluorescence microscope equipped with an Apotome apparatus. Images were captured digitally using different filter sets and merged using AxioVision (v4.5) and Adobe Photoshop software (v7.0).

Western blot analysis

Protein preparation, SDS-PAGE, and immunoblotting were performed as previously described [37]. KDEL (1:1000, Assay designs, Ann Arbor, MI, USA), phospho-PERK, PERK, IRE1α, ATF6α from (1:800, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), phospho-IIRE1α from (1:800, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), ATF6α (1:1000, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), XBP1 (1:1000, New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA) or β-actin (1:2000, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) primary antibodies and horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) were used.

RNA interference

Customized Stealth siRNA duplex oligonucleotides against pXbp1 (Genbank accession no. FJ213449.1) were synthesized by Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA, USA). The sequences were as follows: sense 5'-UGAAGAGUCAACACCGUCAGA AUCC-3', antisense 5'-GGAUUCUGACGGU-GUUGACUCUUCA-3'. BLOCK-It Fluorescent Oligo (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) was used as the control. Before transfection, cells were plated at 50% confluency in Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum without antibiotics and incubated overnight. Transfections were performed with Lipofectamine™ RNAiMAX (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) as directed by the manufacturer. Transfection efficiencies were checked by the fluorescent-labeled control siRNA. The final concentration of the siRNA was 100nM. After 24 h incubation with siRNA, RT-PCR and cell viability assay were performed.

Statistical analysis

All experiments were repeated at least three times and the data was presented as the mean and error bar (± S.E.M.). The statistical significance was tested by Microsoft Excel-based application for the student t-test statistical analysis. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered to be significant.

Authors' contributions

KSL, DBK and KY designed the experiments. JYZ, KSL, JSK, and BSS performed the experiments. DIJ supplied materials. KSL and KY analyzed and interpreted data. JYZ, KSL and KY wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Supplementary Material

Additional file 1

Figure S1 Tunicamycine triggers ER stress-mediated cell death in PEF cells. Cell morphology and caspase-3 activity

Click here for file (68.9KB, PDF)
Additional file 2

Figure S2 Knock-down of pXbp1 by the pXbp1 siRNA in PEF cells. Expression levels of pXbp1 mRNA was measured by RT-PCR

Click here for file (28.7KB, PDF)
Additional file 3

Figure S3 Knock-down of pXbp1 by the pXbp1 siRNA in PEF cells. Expression levels of pXbp1 protein was measured by the Western blot analysis using the anti-XBP-1 antibody

Click here for file (81.8KB, PDF)
Additional file 4

Figure S4 pXbp1 Knock-down enhances ER stress-mediated cell death. Cell death was analyzed by TUNEL staining in PEF cells

Click here for file (263KB, PDF)
Additional file 5

Table S1 PCR Primers used in this study. A description of PCR primers used in this study

Click here for file (71KB, PDF)

Contributor Information

Jin-Yu Zhang, Email: yuermemory@hotmail.com.

Kyu-Sun Lee, Email: ekuse74@kribb.re.kr.

Ji-Su Kim, Email: vjman@kribb.re.kr.

Bong-Seok Song, Email: sbs6401@kribb.re.kr.

Dong-Il Jin, Email: dijin@cnu.ac.kr.

Deog-Bon Koo, Email: dbkoo@daegu.ac.kr.

Kweon Yu, Email: kweonyu@kribb.re.kr.

Acknowledgements and Funding

We thank Dr. Masayuki Miura (University of Tokyo) for ERAI vector and Dr. O-Yu Kwon for comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by the grants from the National Research Foundation of Korea (2008-0061669, 2009-0080870 and 2010-0020964), the KRIBB Research Initiative Program, and BioGreen 21 Program (20070401034017) of the Republic of Korea.

References

  1. Ron D, Walter P. Signal integration in the endoplasmic reticulum unfolded protein response. Nature reviews. 2007;8(7):519–529. doi: 10.1038/nrm2199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Boyce M, Yuan J. Cellular response to endoplasmic reticulum stress: a matter of life or death. Cell death and differentiation. 2006;13(3):363–373. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Wu J, Kaufman RJ. From acute ER stress to physiological roles of the Unfolded Protein Response. Cell death and differentiation. 2006;13(3):374–384. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Urano F, Wang X, Bertolotti A, Zhang Y, Chung P, Harding HP, Ron D. Coupling of stress in the ER to activation of JNK protein kinases by transmembrane protein kinase IRE1. Science (New York, NY. 2000;287(5453):664–666. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5453.664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Yoshida H, Matsui T, Yamamoto A, Okada T, Mori K. XBP1 mRNA is induced by ATF6 and spliced by IRE1 in response to ER stress to produce a highly active transcription factor. Cell. 2001;107(7):881–891. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00611-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lee AH, Iwakoshi NN, Glimcher LH. XBP-1 regulates a subset of endoplasmic reticulum resident chaperone genes in the unfolded protein response. Molecular and cellular biology. 2003;23(21):7448–7459. doi: 10.1128/MCB.23.21.7448-7459.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ibrahim Z, Busch J, Awwad M, Wagner R, Wells K, Cooper DK. Selected physiologic compatibilities and incompatibilities between human and porcine organ systems. Xenotransplantation. 2006;13(6):488–499. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3089.2006.00346.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Rogers CS, Hao Y, Rokhlina T, Samuel M, Stoltz DA, Li Y, Petroff E, Vermeer DW, Kabel AC, Yan Z. et al. Production of CFTR-null and CFTR-DeltaF508 heterozygous pigs by adeno-associated virus-mediated gene targeting and somatic cell nuclear transfer. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2008;118(4):1571–1577. doi: 10.1172/JCI34773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bellinger DA, Merricks EP, Nichols TC. Swine models of type 2 diabetes mellitus: insulin resistance, glucose tolerance, and cardiovascular complications. ILAR journal/National Research Council, Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources. 2006;47(3):243–258. doi: 10.1093/ilar.47.3.243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dyson MC, Alloosh M, Vuchetich JP, Mokelke EA, Sturek M. Components of metabolic syndrome and coronary artery disease in female Ossabaw swine fed excess atherogenic diet. Comparative medicine. 2006;56(1):35–45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Rogers NJ, Mirenda V, Jackson I, Dorling A, Lechler RI. Costimulatory blockade by the induction of an endogenous xenospecific antibody response. Nature immunology. 2000;1(2):163–168. doi: 10.1038/77853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hammer RE, Pursel VG, Rexroad CE Jr, Wall RJ, Bolt DJ, Ebert KM, Palmiter RD, Brinster RL. Production of transgenic rabbits, sheep and pigs by microinjection. Nature. 1985;315(6021):680–683. doi: 10.1038/315680a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Dai Y, Vaught TD, Boone J, Chen SH, Phelps CJ, Ball S, Monahan JA, Jobst PM, McCreath KJ, Lamborn AE. et al. Targeted disruption of the alpha1,3-galactosyltransferase gene in cloned pigs. Nature biotechnology. 2002;20(3):251–255. doi: 10.1038/nbt0302-251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lai L, Kolber-Simonds D, Park KW, Cheong HT, Greenstein JL, Im GS, Samuel M, Bonk A, Rieke A, Day BN. et al. Production of alpha-1,3-galactosyltransferase knockout pigs by nuclear transfer cloning. Science (New York, NY. 2002;295(5557):1089–1092. doi: 10.1126/science.1068228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Polejaeva IA, Chen SH, Vaught TD, Page RL, Mullins J, Ball S, Dai Y, Boone J, Walker S, Ayares DL. et al. Cloned pigs produced by nuclear transfer from adult somatic cells. Nature. 2000;407(6800):86–90. doi: 10.1038/35024082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Elbein AD. Inhibitors of the biosynthesis and processing of N-linked oligosaccharide chains. Annu Rev Biochem. 1987;56:497–534. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.56.070187.002433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Munro S, Pelham HR. An Hsp70-like protein in the ER: identity with the 78 kd glucose-regulated protein and immunoglobulin heavy chain binding protein. Cell. 1986;46(2):291–300. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90746-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Oikawa D, Tokuda M, Hosoda A, Iwawaki T. Identification of a consensus element recognized and cleaved by IRE1 alpha. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38(18):6265–6273. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Yoshida H, Oku M, Suzuki M, Mori K. pXBP1(U) encoded in XBP1 pre-mRNA negatively regulates unfolded protein response activator pXBP1(S) in mammalian ER stress response. J Cell Biol. 2006;172(4):565–575. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200508145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Iwawaki T, Akai R, Kohno K, Miura M. A transgenic mouse model for monitoring endoplasmic reticulum stress. Nature medicine. 2004;10(1):98–102. doi: 10.1038/nm970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lee AH, Iwakoshi NN, Anderson KC, Glimcher LH. Proteasome inhibitors disrupt the unfolded protein response in myeloma cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2003;100(17):9946–9951. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1334037100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Reimold AM, Etkin A, Clauss I, Perkins A, Friend DS, Zhang J, Horton HF, Scott A, Orkin SH, Byrne MC. et al. An essential role in liver development for transcription factor XBP-1. Genes & development. 2000;14(2):152–157. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Reimold AM, Iwakoshi NN, Manis J, Vallabhajosyula P, Szomolanyi-Tsuda E, Gravallese EM, Friend D, Grusby MJ, Alt F, Glimcher LH. Plasma cell differentiation requires the transcription factor XBP-1. Nature. 2001;412(6844):300–307. doi: 10.1038/35085509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lee AH, Chu GC, Iwakoshi NN, Glimcher LH. XBP-1 is required for biogenesis of cellular secretory machinery of exocrine glands. The EMBO journal. 2005;24(24):4368–4380. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600903. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Wernersson R, Schierup MH, Jorgensen FG, Gorodkin J, Panitz F, Staerfeldt HH, Christensen OF, Mailund T, Hornshoj H, Klein A. et al. Pigs in sequence space: a 0.66X coverage pig genome survey based on shotgun sequencing. BMC genomics. 2005;6(1):70. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-6-70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Schroder M, Kaufman RJ. The mammalian unfolded protein response. Annu Rev Biochem. 2005;74:739–789. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.73.011303.074134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Haze K, Yoshida H, Yanagi H, Yura T, Mori K. Mammalian transcription factor ATF6 is synthesized as a transmembrane protein and activated by proteolysis in response to endoplasmic reticulum stress. Mol Biol Cell. 1999;10(11):3787–3799. doi: 10.1091/mbc.10.11.3787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Tarn WY, Steitz JA. Pre-mRNA splicing: the discovery of a new spliceosome doubles the challenge. Trends in biochemical sciences. 1997;22(4):132–137. doi: 10.1016/S0968-0004(97)01018-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Calfon M, Zeng H, Urano F, Till JH, Hubbard SR, Harding HP, Clark SG, Ron D. IRE1 couples endoplasmic reticulum load to secretory capacity by processing the XBP-1 mRNA. Nature. 2002;415(6867):92–96. doi: 10.1038/415092a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Harding HP, Zeng H, Zhang Y, Jungries R, Chung P, Plesken H, Sabatini DD, Ron D. Diabetes mellitus and exocrine pancreatic dysfunction in perk-/- mice reveals a role for translational control in secretory cell survival. Molecular cell. 2001;7(6):1153–1163. doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00264-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Oyadomari S, Mori M. Roles of CHOP/GADD153 in endoplasmic reticulum stress. Cell death and differentiation. 2004;11(4):381–389. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Harding HP, Zhang Y, Bertolotti A, Zeng H, Ron D. Perk is essential for translational regulation and cell survival during the unfolded protein response. Molecular cell. 2000;5(5):897–904. doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80330-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Rutkowski DT, Arnold SM, Miller CN, Wu J, Li J, Gunnison KM, Mori K, Sadighi Akha AA, Raden D, Kaufman RJ. Adaptation to ER stress is mediated by differential stabilities of pro-survival and pro-apoptotic mRNAs and proteins. PLoS Biol. 2006;4(11):e374. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Okada T, Yoshida H, Akazawa R, Negishi M, Mori K. Distinct roles of activating transcription factor 6 (ATF6) and double-stranded RNA-activated protein kinase-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK) in transcription during the mammalian unfolded protein response. Biochem J. 2002;366(Pt 2):585–594. doi: 10.1042/BJ20020391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Masaki T, Yoshida M, Noguchi S. Targeted disruption of CRE-binding factor TREB5 gene leads to cellular necrosis in cardiac myocytes at the embryonic stage. Biochemical and biophysical research communications. 1999;261(2):350–356. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1999.0972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Sha H, He Y, Chen H, Wang C, Zenno A, Shi H, Yang X, Zhang X, Qi L. The IRE1alpha-XBP1 pathway of the unfolded protein response is required for adipogenesis. Cell metabolism. 2009;9(6):556–564. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2009.04.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Lee do Y, Lee KS, Lee HJ, Kim do H, Noh YH, Yu K, Jung HY, Lee SH, Lee JY, Youn YC, Activation of PERK signaling attenuates Abeta-mediated ER stress. PloS one. p. e10489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Additional file 1

Figure S1 Tunicamycine triggers ER stress-mediated cell death in PEF cells. Cell morphology and caspase-3 activity

Click here for file (68.9KB, PDF)
Additional file 2

Figure S2 Knock-down of pXbp1 by the pXbp1 siRNA in PEF cells. Expression levels of pXbp1 mRNA was measured by RT-PCR

Click here for file (28.7KB, PDF)
Additional file 3

Figure S3 Knock-down of pXbp1 by the pXbp1 siRNA in PEF cells. Expression levels of pXbp1 protein was measured by the Western blot analysis using the anti-XBP-1 antibody

Click here for file (81.8KB, PDF)
Additional file 4

Figure S4 pXbp1 Knock-down enhances ER stress-mediated cell death. Cell death was analyzed by TUNEL staining in PEF cells

Click here for file (263KB, PDF)
Additional file 5

Table S1 PCR Primers used in this study. A description of PCR primers used in this study

Click here for file (71KB, PDF)

Articles from BMC Molecular Biology are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES