Skip to main content
Nutrition Journal logoLink to Nutrition Journal
. 2011 May 8;10:43. doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-10-43

Nutritional status of pre-school children from low income families

Denise O Shoeps 1, Luiz Carlos de Abreu 1,2, Vitor E Valenti 2,3,4, Viviane G Nascimento 1, Adriana G de Oliveira 1, Paulo R Gallo 1, Rubens Wajnsztejn 2, Claudio Leone 1,
PMCID: PMC3112402  PMID: 21549003

Abstract

Background

We evaluated growth and nutritional status of preschool children between 2 and 6 years old from low income families from 14 daycare centers.

Methods

Cross-sectional study with 1544 children from daycare centers of Santo Andre, Brazil. Body weight (W), height (H) and body mass index (BMI) were classified according to the 2000 National Center for Health Statistics (CDC/NCHS). Cutoff points for nutritional disorders: -2 z scores and 2.5 and 10 percentiles for malnutrition risk, 85 to 95 percentile for overweight and above BMI 95 percentile for obesity. Stepwise Forward Regression method was used including age, gender, birth weight, breastfeeding duration, age of mother at birth and period of time they attended the daycare center.

Results

Children presented mean z scores of H, W and BMI above the median of the CDC/NCHS reference. Girls were taller and heavier than boys, while we observed similar BMI between both genders. The z scores tended to rise with age. A Pearson Coefficient of Correlation of 0.89 for W, 0.93 for H and 0.95 for BMI was documented indicating positive association of age with weight, height and BMI. The frequency of children below -2 z scores was lower than expected: 1.5% for W, 1.75% for H and 0% for BMI, which suggests that there were no malnourished children. The other extremity of the distribution evidenced prevalence of overweight and obesity of 16.8% and 10.8%, respectively.

Conclusion

Low income preschool children are in an advanced stage of nutritional transition with a high prevalence of overweight.

Background

Several countries are going through a period of epidemiological transition with reduced incidence of infectious diseases, child mortality and birth rates, associated with high prevalence of chronic diseases and increase in life expectancy at birth [1]. With respect to nutritional transition this situation also results in decreased prevalence of malnutrition in childhood and improved growth pattern of children, a fact that was also observed recently in Brazil [2-4]. In the last two decades in industrialized countries this trend has continued with a higher prevalence of obesity and its consequences, presenting in adults from higher socio-economic classes [5].

Since the early 90's several authors have noted the obesity epidemic affecting developing countries as this change in nutritional status is occurring much faster than in developed countries [3,4,6,7]. The obesity epidemic quickly spread to teenagers, school age children and recently to preschool children, mainly three years old [7]. As a result of early obesity onset several other health problems may arise in childhood, including hypertension, dyslipidemia, type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular problems, which may impair quality of life and decrease life expectancy [8,9].

The literature has already demonstrated the relationship between childhood poverty and abdominal obesity in adulthood [10]. A rise in inactivity is also a risk factor for obesity [11,12]. As mentioned above, obesity is a risk factor for many diseases such as certain cancers, hypertension, type II diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, metabolic syndrome and coronary heart disease [13,14]. The primary cause of malnutrition in developed countries is disease. Disease related malnutrition is associated with adverse effects on clinical outcome. These adverse effects vary from impaired wound healing and postoperative complications to mortality. Poor nutritional status has not only been associated with in-hospital adverse effects, but also with adverse effects at both pre-admission and post-discharge [15,16].

According to the IDB (Indicadores de Dados Básicos - Indicators of Basic Data), in 2008 the percentage of poor people in the State of São Paulo was 14.9% [17]. Data of overweight and obesity rates in Brazilian school-age children between 2 and 6 years old from low income families are limited. Because country-specific studies do not provide generalizable information, the World Health Organization (WHO) has highlighted the need to study child obesity around the world [18]. In addition, new evidences regarding overweight prevalence in children from low income families are important to direct and implement public politics and improve public health system. Thus, given the relevance of obesity in infancy and the lack of studies which investigate its association with socioeconomic status, we endeavored to evaluate growth and nutritional status of children from low income families. We also evaluated the relationship between obesity/overweight and child age, gender, birth weight and duration of breast feeding.

Methods

This is a cross-sectional study of anthropometric data in preschool children from 14 daycare centers linked to the Department of Health and the Federation of charities (FEAS) in Santo Andre, SP, Brazil. The data collection was performed between 2001 and 2002. Santo Andre is a city with approximately 600,000 inhabitants and a total of 43 daycare centers. The Department of Health and the FEAS develop systematic surveillance activities to children's health enrolled in day care centers. The project was undertaken in partnership between the day care centers and the public system. This study was explained to the parents or guardians responsible for the child and it was begun only after his or her consent according to the standards of the committees of research and ethics. All experimental procedures were in compliance with the Helsinki Declaration. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee in Research of the Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP, number 923/00).

The study population included 1639 children aged between 2 and 6 years old, all from low income families. We excluded 95 (5.8%) because they were not of preschool age, hence, it remained 840 (54.4%) boys and 704 (45.6%) girls from a total of 1544 children (Table 1). We also excluded children who presented congenital diseases, history of nutritional and metabolic diseases, chronic diseases that could influence their growth and those who did not agree to collect data. This information was collected during the interview. According to the government (http://www2.santoandre.sp.gov.br/), this population represents a proportion of approximately 40% of all children from 2 to 6 years old from Santo Andre. We observed average monthly income per capita (AMPC) of 0.55 minimum wages (MW - ~U$175.00), the average number of persons per house was 4.6, the median years of mother schooling was 6 years and the median years of father schooling was 5 years. Half of the parents worked in trades such as unskilled and 15% were unemployed (Table 2).

Table 1.

Children distribution according to gender and age

Gender Age Male n (%) Female n (%) Total n(%)
< 3 years 69 (8.21) 71 (10.08) 140 (9.06)
3 - 4 years 251 (29.88) 179 (25.43) 430 (27.85)
4.1- 4.9 years 101 (12.03) 142 (20.18) 243 (15.75)
> 5 years 419 (49.88) 312 (44.31) 731 (47.34)

Total 840 (100) 704 (100) 1544 (100)

Table 2.

Distribution of children parents enrolled in day care centers according to occupation*

Ocupation Father (%) Mother (%)
Unemployed 198 (19.1) 167 (11.5)
Service generalities 447 (43.1) 900 (62.2)
Trade 9 (10.5) 164 (11.3)
Industries 130 (12.5) 60 (4.1)
Retired or pensioner 20 (1.9) 7 (0.5)
Others 134 (13.0) 150 (10.4)
Total 1038 (100.0) 1448 (100.0)

*Adapted from the classification of Ministério da Fazenda - Secretaria da Receita Federal Natureza da Ocupação, www.receita.fazenda.gov.br

Weight (W) and height (H) were measured by researchers using internationally accepted techniques [19] under supervision of pediatricians from the daycare centers and all data were collected from records of child care using a standardized form. Anthropometric data were collected in the daycare center, according to Lohman et al [20] method. The child's weight was measured by using the Seca® electronic scale with a split of 0.1 g, and height was measured by stadiometer wall (Seca®) with two meters and centimeters and millimeters subdivision [21]. In addition to weight and height we included the following variables: age, gender, birth weight, duration of breastfeeding, maternal age at child birth, level of maternal education, AMPC and how long they had attended the daycare center. Scales and stadiometers were calibrated regularly and reliably.

The values of W, H and body mass index (BMI) were transformed into z scores and percentiles based on the National Center for Health Statistics - 2000 (CDC/NCHS) framework and it was statistically analyzed in relation to the distribution and the association with socio-demographic and health data.

The cutoff points for nutritional disorders analysis were: -2 z scores and 2.5 and 10 percentiles for risk of malnutrition, 85 to 95 percentile for overweight and above the 95 percentile for obesity [22,23].

Data were stored in an Excel® worksheet. In order to calculate anthropometric indices we used the software EpiInfo 3.3.2 Nutrition February 2005, which described the frequency distribution and central tendency measures (mean, standard deviation and median). Pearson's coefficient was used to evaluate the correlation between age and anthropometric indices.

The analysis was performed by the Stepwise Backward Regression method including the following variables: age, gender, birth weight, duration of breastfeeding, age of mother at birth and how long they had attended the daycare center which in univariate analysis showed a p < 0.15 in the evaluation of its association with excess weight (overweight and obesity, evaluated by z score of BMI). In order to verify if the proposed regression model fits the data well, we applied the F-test.

The level of significance (α) adopted for all statistical tests was 5%. The statistical processing of data was performed with SPSS ® 12.0.

Results

Regarding the average growth achieved by the group of children as a whole, Table 3 shows that in the three variables studied: height, weight and BMI, the mean z score was above the reference values of the CDC/NCHS and that this difference was much higher with respect to weight and BMI. There was no significant difference between the variability of the variables collected in our study and the variability of the same variables according to the CDC/NCHS reference.

Table 3.

Mean and standard deviation of z scores for height (height/age - HAZ), weight (weight/age - WAZ) and body mass index (BMI/age - BMIZ) according to gender in preschool children 2-6 years of age

Gender Male (n = 840) Female (n = 704) Total (n = 1544)
HAZ 0.07 (1.039) 0.23 (0.99) 0.14 (1.02)
WAZ 0.28 (1.108) 0.33 (0.977) 0.30 (1.05)
BMIZ 0.41 (1.174) 0.41 (1.006) 0.41 (1.1)

In Table 4 the z scores for W and BMI tended to reach higher values than those of H in older children. Moreover, higher' values can also be observed in younger children: the z-score of BMI (or BMI/BMI/age) is higher than the z-score of H (or H/A - height/age) in children aged 2 years old as well. However, those differences did not reach statistical significance. The average values of z scores for W and H were higher in females, however, BMI were identical between the both genders. The slope of the three lines was statistically significant with F of 11.53 (p = 0.0426), 20.81 (p = 0.0197) and 27.70 (p = 0.0134), respectively, for W, H and BMI. The average H was the only variable in those younger than 3 years old below the median of the reference. The correlation coefficient for each of the 3 variables was quite high: 0.89, 0.93 and 0.95, respectively for W, H and BMI. Our findings indicate high prevalence of overweight and obesity affecting approximately one in four children.

Table 4.

Mean and standard deviation of z scores of HAZ (height/age), WAZ (weight/age) and BMIZ (body mass index/age) of preschool children 2-6 years of age according to age

Age 2 years (n = 141) 3 years (n = 313) 4 years (n = 354) 5 years (n = 453) 6 years (n = 278)
HAZ -0.154 (0.909) 0.072 (1.058) 0.081 (1.028) 0.165 (0.973) 0.183 (1.068)
WAZ 0.006 (1.052) 0.071 (1.111) 0.164 (1.004) 0.261 (1.031) 0.355 (1.042)
BMIZ 0.111 (1.189) 0.218 (1.245) 0.276 (1.06) 0.365 (1.014) 0.454 (1.032)

Child growth evaluation values in Figure 1 represented the distribution of z scores with respect to W, H, and BMI, which were shifted to the right of the standard, towards higher values, especially BMI. The average values of z scores of W and H were higher for girls, however, BMI were identical, suggesting no significant gender differences in the prevalence of obesity.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Distribution of preschool children 2-6 years of age according to their z scores of weight, height and BMI for age.

In Figure 2, noting nutritional risks below 2.5 p or between 2.5 p and 10 p, for W and BMI, the proportion of children was decreased or equal compared to what was expected according to the CDC/NCHS reference, while the other spectrum extremity showed a higher than expected percentile proportion of obese or overweight values.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Proportion of preschool children 2-6 years of age classified as nutritional risk according to percentiles of W/A (weight/age) and BMI/A (BMI/age). *The dark green bar represents the values according to the 2000 National Center for Health Statistics (CDC/NCHS).

In Multinomial Logistic Regression, when using obesity as the only dependent variable, there was an association with girls and higher birth weight (3,000 g or more), (OR: 1.52; IC 95%: 1.17 to 2.12; p = 0.028 and OR: 1.8; IC 95%: 1.25 to -2.34; p = 0.0001, respectively). When analyzed together, obesity or overweight, as a single dependent variable, we observed only association with high birth weight, OR 1.44 (IC 95%: 1.19 to 2.01; p = 0.001).

Discussion

Until recently the literature indicated that children from low income families presented growth development below their potential, with height values lower than the median values of the reference growth of children in industrialized countries, as proposed by the CDC/NCHS in the United States of America. These differences were observed among children from the same country or the same region differing only in socioeconomic class and it always reported the disadvantage of children from low income families [24]. The differences regarding height were the result of a worse nutritional status and not inadequate living conditions [25].

Daycare centers in Santo Andre showed growth in stature was similar and even higher, from four years old on, compared to the U.S. reference, even though they were children from low income families. We may propose some reasons for the prevalence of being overweight. First, this fact associated with low prevalence (or even absence) of malnutrition indicate improvement of living conditions of this population, particularly with regard to access to food and health care [4,26]. Second, our results indicated high prevalence of overweight and obesity, affecting approximately one in four children. The high prevalence to be overweight and obesity in children at preschool age was described in several countries, including Chile [27]. The anthropometric profile of preschool children found in Santo Andre is compatible with the rapid nutritional transition shown in developing countries, including Latin America [6]. Third, in these stages of epidemiological nutritional transition, daycare and preschools, which are traditionally regarded as a protective factor for malnutrition, might become a risk for overweight and obesity, since it is where children stay on average 8 hours per day, 5 days per week, and where about 75% of daily calories [28-30] provided. It is clear that this finding cannot be attributed directly and exclusively to daycare centers. Possibly low income families cannot access proper nutrition, which would account for the rest of their daily caloric intake. Moreover, it is possible that these pre-school children perform less physical activity at home, due to the use of television [3,29]. This situation may be considered as a risk factor for children born with normal or high weight [30]. Fourth, the interpretation of our findings indicates that overweight and obesity compromise growth at this stage of epidemiological and nutritional transition in low income children from an urban area of a developing country. This nutritional deficiency due to increased access to inadequate food quality tends to continue throughout life [31-33]. It results in elevated social costs to the health care system, which will financially affect these. All factors cited above may affect our population.

Our data are particularly alarming because obesity was already observed in 3 year old children with a tendency to increase as they grow. This trend may result in high rates of obesity in young adults, with a very early onset of morbidity [9,34]. The metabolic changes that occur as a result of rapid and intense growth tend to continue into itself until adulthood, hence compromising health [8].

Our study presents some points that should be addressed. Although a large part of the recognized classification systems of growth and development define preschool period from 3 to 6 years old [16,35] we investigated children from 2 to 6 years old. On the other hand, families in Brazil [36,37] do send 2 year old children to school. Not including maternal anthropometry is a limitation, because it does affect the children's nutritional status [38]. We did not use the outcome measure BMI-for-age percentile, as recommended by the CDC/NCHS for people aged 2-20. We used Z-scores only, the z-score indicates how many standard deviations an observation or data is above or below the mean [21]. We decided to use only z-score because it is our protocol.

Conclusion

Main results showed that: 1) height, weight and BMI presented average z score are above the reference values of the CDC/NCHS, this difference was higher in weight and BMI; 2) z scores for weight and BMI tended to reach higher values than those of stature in older children; 3) the distribution of z scores with respect to weight, height and BMI were shifted towards higher values compared to the CDC/NCHS, more pronounced in BMI; 4) the average values of z scores of weight and height were higher in females, however, BMI were identical, suggesting no significant difference between gender regarding overweight prevalence and; 5) there was a percentile proportion of obese or overweight higher than expected in this population composed of children from low income families. In conclusion, preschool children from low income families are in an advanced stage of nutritional transition with a high prevalence for overweight and obesity.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

All authors participated in the acquisition of data and revision of the manuscript. DOS and CL conceived of the study, determined the design, performed the statistical analysis, interpreted the data and drafted the manuscript, VEV, LCA, VGN, PR, RW and AGO determined the design, interpreted the data and drafted the manuscript. All authors read and gave final approval for the version submitted for publication.

Contributor Information

Denise O Shoeps, Email: denise-dos@ig.com.br.

Luiz Carlos de Abreu, Email: luizcarlos@usp.br.

Vitor E Valenti, Email: vitor.valenti@gmail.com.

Viviane G Nascimento, Email: vivisimon@hotmail.com.

Adriana G de Oliveira, Email: agdeoliveira@gmail.com.

Paulo R Gallo, Email: prgallo@usp.br.

Rubens Wajnsztejn, Email: rubenswajnsztejn@terra.com.br.

Claudio Leone, Email: leone.claudio@gmail.com.

Acknowledgements

This study received financial support from Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP). We are very grateful for the kind and helpful English spell and grammar review performed by Dr. Jaques Belik. We appreciate the reviewers for their highly constructive reviews (Dr. Alaa Ibrahim, Dr. Anna Winkvist, Dr. Fernando Luiz Affonso Fonseca, Dr. Juliana Kain and Dr. Iris Groeneveld).

References

  1. Omran AR. The Epidemiologic Transition in the Americas. Panamerican Health Organization and World Health Organization: Maryland; 1996. [Google Scholar]
  2. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística - IBGE Pesquisa de Orçamentos Familiares 2002-2003 - Antropometria e analise do estado nutricisonal de crianças e adolescentes no Brasil 2006IBGE: Rio de Janeiro; 21552747 [Google Scholar]
  3. Monteiro CA, Mondini L, Souza ALM, Popkin BM. The nutrition transition in Brazil. Eur J Cl Nut. 1995;49:105–113. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Monteiro CA, Conde WL. Tendência secular da desnutrição e da obesidade na infância na Cidade de São Paulo (1974 a 1996) Rev Saúde Públ. 2000;34:52–61. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dehghan M, Akhtar-Danesh N, Merchant AT. Childhood obesity, prevalence and prevention. Nutr J. 2005;4:24. doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-4-24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Popkin BM. The nutrition transition in low-income countries: An emerging crisis. Nutrition Reviews. 1994;52:285–298. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.1994.tb01460.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. DeOnis M, Blösner M. Prevalence and trends of overweight among preschool children in developing countries. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000;72:1032–9. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/72.4.1032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Paulson QX, Hong J, Holcomb VB, Nunez NP. Effects of body weight and alcohol consumption on insulin sensitivity. Nutr J. 2010;9:14. doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-9-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Estrada E. Childhood obesity: complications. Consensus in Pediatrics. 2004;1:13–24. [Google Scholar]
  10. Drewnowski A, Specter SE. Poverty and Obesity: the role of energy density and energy costs. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;79:6–16. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/79.1.6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Jahns L, Siega-Riz AM, Popkin BM. The increasing prevalence of snacking among US children from 1977 to 1996. J Pediatr. 2001;138:493–8. doi: 10.1067/mpd.2001.112162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Robinson TN. Television viewing and childhood obesity. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2001;48:1017–25. doi: 10.1016/S0031-3955(05)70354-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Marshall SJ, Biddle SJH, Gorely T, Cameron N, Murdey I. Relationship between media use, body fatness and physical activity in children and youth: A meta-analysis. Int J Obes. 2004;28:1238–1246. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Stunkard AJ, Berkowitz RI, Stallings VA, Schoeller DA. Energy intake, not energy output, is a determinant of body size in infants. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999;69:524–30. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/69.3.524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Bundred P, Kitchiner D, Buchan I. Prevalence of overweight and obese children between 1989 and 1998: population based series of cross sectional studies. BMJ. 2001;322:326–329. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7282.326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Townsend MS. Obesity in low-income communities: prevalence, effects, a place to begin. J Am Diet Assoc. 2006;106:34–37. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2005.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. González D, Nazmi A, Victora CG. Childhood poverty and abdominal obesity in adulthood: a systematic review. Cad Saude Publica. 2009;25:S427–40. doi: 10.1590/s0102-311x2009001500008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kain J, Uauy R, Leyton B, Cerda R, Olivares S, Vio F. Effectiveness of a dietary and physical activity intervention to prevent obesity in school age children. Rev Med Chil. 2008;136:22–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Groeneveld IF, Solomons NW, Doak CM. Nutritional status of urban schoolchildren of high and low socioeconomic status in Quetzaltenango, Guatemala. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2007;22:169–77. doi: 10.1590/s1020-49892007000800003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Flodin L, Svensson S, Cederholm T. Body mass index as a predictor of 1 year mortality in geriatric patients. Clin Nutr. 2000;19:121–125. doi: 10.1054/clnu.1999.0091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Neelemaat F, Thijs A, Seidell JC, Bosmans JE, van Bokhorst-de van der Schueren MA. Study protocol: cost-effectiveness of transmural nutritional support in malnourished elderly patients in comparison with usual care. Nutr J. 2010;9:6. doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-9-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Yanai H, Tomono Y, Ito K, Furutani N, Yoshida H, Tada N. The underlying mechanisms for development of hypertension in the metabolic syndrome. Nutr J. 2008;7:10. doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-7-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Ibrahim AI, Hawamdeh ZM, Al-Smadi JT, Ammari BA. Prevalence of overweight and obesity in urban and semi-urban Jordanian children aged 3-6 years. Child Care Health Dev. 2008;34:464–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2008.00821.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Indicadores de Dados Básicos. Indicadores Socioeconômicos - B.5 Proporção de pessoas de baixa renda. http://tabnet.datasus.gov.br/cgi/tabcgi.exe?idb2009/b05.def Accessed on April 16, 2009.
  25. Onis M, Garza C, Onyango AW. Comparison of the WHO child growth standards and the CDC 2000 Growth Charts. J Nutr. 2007;137:144–8. doi: 10.1093/jn/137.1.144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Tai ML, Goh KL, Mohd-Taib SH, Rampal S, Mahadeva S. Anthropometric, biochemical and clinical assessment of malnutrition in Malaysian patients with advanced cirrhosis. Nutr J. 2010;9:27. doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-9-27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lohman TG, Roche AF, Matorell R. Antropometric standardization reference mamual. Human Kinetics Books: Illinois; 1988. [Google Scholar]
  28. Nascimento VG, Machado TC, Bertoli CJ, de Abreu LC, Valenti VE, Leone C. Evaluation of Mid-upper Arm Circumference in Pre-school Children: Comparison Between NCHS/CDC-2000 and WHO-2006 References. J Trop Pediatr. 2010. [DOI] [PubMed]
  29. World Health Organization. Physical status: the use and interpretation of anthropometry. WHO: Geneva; 1995. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Cole TJ, Bellizzi Mc, Flagal M, Dietz WH. Estabilishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: international survey. BMJ. 2000;320:1240–1243. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7244.1240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Velásquez MM, Salazar G, Vio F, Hernandez J, Rojas J. Nutritional status and body composition in Chilean preschool children attending day care centers. Food and Nutrition Bull. 2002;23:250–3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Uauy R, Kain J. The epidemiological transition: need to incorporate obesity prevention into nutrition programmes. Public Health Nutr. 2002;5:223–229. doi: 10.1079/PHN2001297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Agras WS, Mascola JM. Risk factors for childhood overweight. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2005;17:648–652. doi: 10.1097/01.mop.0000172818.87261.ab. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Guimarães LV, Barros MBA. Differences between the nutritional status of children in public preschools and nutritional transition. J Pediatr. 2001;77:381–85. doi: 10.1590/S0021-75572001000500008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Baird JB, Fisnher D, Lucas P, leijnen J, Roberts H, Law C. Being big or growing fast: systematic review of size and growth in infancy and later obesity. BMJ. 2005;331:929. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38586.411273.E0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Bueno MB, Marchioni DML, Fisberg RM. Changes in the nutritional status of children in public day care facilities in the municipality of São Paulo, Brazil. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2003;14:165–170. doi: 10.1590/s1020-49892003000800003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Dennison BA, Erb TA, Jenkins PL. Television viewing and television in bedroom associated with overweight risk among low-income preschool children. Pediatrics. 2002;109:1028–1035. doi: 10.1542/peds.109.6.1028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Silveira KB, Alves JF, Ferreira HS, Sawaya AL, Florêncio TM. Association between malnutrition in children living in slums, maternal nutritional status, and environmental factors. J Pediatr. 2010;86:215–20. doi: 10.1590/S0021-75572010000300009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Nutrition Journal are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES