Abstract
Two-dimensional films of surface-active agents—from phospholipids and proteins to nanoparticles and colloids—stabilize fluid interfaces, which are essential to the science, technology and engineering of everyday life. The 2D nature of interfaces present unique challenges and opportunities: coupling between the 2D films and the bulk fluids complicates the measurement of surface dynamic properties, but allows the interfacial microstructure to be directly visualized during deformation. Here we present a novel technique that combines active microrheology with fluorescence microscopy to visualize fluid interfaces as they deform under applied stress, allowing structure and rheology to be correlated on the micron-scale in monolayer films. We show that even simple, single-component lipid monolayers can exhibit viscoelasticity, history dependence, a yield stress and hours-long time scales for elastic recoil and aging. Simultaneous visualization of the monolayer under stress shows that the rich dynamical response results from the cooperative dynamics and deformation of liquid-crystalline domains and their boundaries.
Two-dimensional fluid interfaces are ubiquitous, but studying their surface dynamic properties is difficult because of coupling between the film and bulk fluid. Choi et al. combine active microrheology with fluorescence microscopy to image fluid interfaces under applied stress.
Fluid interfaces are ubiquitous in industry, technology and life1. Interfaces separate and organize biological systems2,3, from organelles to cells to organs, and enable gas exchange in respiration4. High-interface foams and emulsions find wide use in industry, food and personal care products5: emulsified oil droplets give both taste and texture to a fine espresso. Surfactants, including traditional amphiphilic fatty acids and phospholipids2,3,4,6,7 and non-traditional surfactants, such as colloids8,9, block copolymers10 and nanoparticles11, lower the free energy of interfaces and introduce a kinetic barrier to coalescence, thereby stabilizing these high-interface systems6 by creating novel microstructures and phases.
The static properties of interfaces have long been studied: Langmuir isotherms relate the surface tension, γ, (or the surface pressure Π=γ(0)–γ(Γ)), to the surface concentration, Γ, of surfactant12,13. However, the dynamic properties of interfaces—how monolayers and bilayers respond to applied forces—can be equally important, albeit less well known. The dynamic response is more challenging to study, as the bulk material generally swamps the interfacial viscoelastic response in a conventional rheometer. Probes moving within the interface feel drag from both the interface and the bulk fluid. To maximize sensitivity to the interfacial properties, the Boussinesq number,
1 |
must be large1,14,15,16,17. Here ηs and η are the viscosities of the interface and the bulk, and Pc and Ac are the contact perimeter and wetted surface area of the probe. Bo establishes a practical lower limit, ηs>ηAc/Pc, that can be measured with a given probe. High-aspect ratio probes such as knife-edges1 or magnetic needles14,15,16,17 maximize sensitivity, and even larger Pc/Ac ratios can be achieved with micron-scale colloidal spheres18,19 or ferromagnetic nanorods16,20.
Here we describe a new active microrheology technique sensitive to the surface viscoelasticity of a wide range of interfaces. Using photolithography, we make micron-scale, ferromagnetic 'microbuttons', whose surface chemistry is tuned to render them amphiphilic (Fig. 1). A known torque is applied by electromagnets to rotate a microbutton at the interface, and the 'buttonholes' are tracked to record the angular displacement as a function of time. The result is a micron-scale, two-dimensional (2D) Couette rheometer with Pc/Ac∼1/R∼1/(10 μm) that can measure surface viscosities of order ηs∼O(10−8) N s m−1 (|Bo|>1), and can simultaneously follow the evolution of the interfacial microstructure with fluorescence microscopy. Our work builds on related, larger-scale techniques21,22, adding not only dramatically enhanced sensitivity but also simultaneous visualization23. Such direct correlation is almost impossible in traditional, three-dimensional (3D) rheology24,25.
Results
Frequency-dependent linear viscoelasticity of liquid-condensed dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine
Here we show that the monolayer dynamics of even a single-component monolayer of dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine (DPPC), one of the primary lipids in lung surfactant5,7 and ubiquitous in cell membranes, can be far richer than ever expected. DPPC monolayers exhibit a disordered liquid-expanded (LE) phase at low surface pressures that transforms into a liquid-condensed (LC) phase with long-range orientational and short-range positional order (hexatic) at Π=7 mN m−1 at 20 °C (Fig. 1)2,3,13,26,27. All experiments are performed at Π=9±1 mN m−1 in the LC phase, just above the coexistence plateau.
A small-amplitude, oscillatory magnetic field, , applied perpendicular to the magnetic moment, , of a microbutton suspended at the interface (Fig. 1), exerts an oscillatory torque that drives a small oscillatory rotation . Measuring the buttonhole orientation along with the applied torque determines the probe's rotational resistance . When Bo≫1, the real and imaginary parts of ζ(ω) are proportional to the surface elastic and viscous shear moduli, G′s(ω) and G′′s(ω)=ωηs(ω), respectively. Much to our surprise, the DPPC monolayer had a primarily elastic response (G′s∼150 nN m−1) down to 0.1 Hz, indicating that the monolayer stored elastic energy, without appreciable relaxation, over 10-s time scales (Fig. 2a–c). Above 4 Hz, however, G′s(ω) and G′′s(ω) crossed, and the monolayer response was primarily viscous (ηs∼70 nN s m−1) (Supplementary Movie 1).
History-dependent rheology of DPPC
Forcing a few large-amplitude (180°) rotations, however, changed the measured response dramatically (Fig. 2d–f). The DPPC monolayer exhibited a viscous (albeit frequency-thinning) response at all frequencies measured, without the elastic storage seen in a 'freshly prepared' monolayer. This dramatic history-dependence highlights the care required in interpreting dynamic measurements of monolayers.
Our ability to visualize the monolayer while deforming it allowed us to unambiguously identify the microstructure changes responsible for this unusual behaviour. The bright lines (high fluorescent dye concentration) in Figure 2c and Supplementary Movie 1 show the boundaries of the irregularly shaped, interlocking ∼10 μm LC domains2, which cannot slide past each other without deforming. DPPC monolayers in the LC phase respond to a weak applied stress with small elastic deformations of the domains, rather than rearrangement of the domains or the domain boundaries24. Large-amplitude deformations, however, drive the monolayer out of its equilibrium microstructure (Fig. 2f and Supplementary Movie 2). The domains deform enough that the boundary forms a continuous, almost circular slip line that effectively fractures the material. The microbutton and domains within the slip line rotate freely, with minimal deformation of the domains inside or outside of the slip line, eliminating the elastic response (Fig. 2d,e).
Ageing and healing of a single slip line
On returning the microbutton to its original orientation and removing the driving torque, the circular slip line roughens (Fig. 3), the smoothed grains heal to their interpenetrating configuration (compare Fig. 3a, e), and the original viscoelastic response (Fig. 3f) is recovered. When the slip line is formed (Fig. 3b), both G′s and G′′s drop 20- to 100-fold (Fig. 3f), and the monolayer appears primarily viscous (G′′s>G′s). However, after shear stops, both G′s and G′′s increase with time: the elastic response is recovered (G′s>G′′s) after 40 s, when the domain structures again interpenetrate (Fig. 3c). Even the detailed features of the grain boundaries and domains are largely restored after 150 s (Fig. 3e).
Surface yield stress measurements from steady rotation
Significant domain deformation should require a stress of order G′s as well: concentrated emulsions yield at applied stresses of ∼G′/10 (refs 5,28,29). Monolayers respond to a steady torque (Fig. 4 and Supplementary Movie 3) by establishing two distinct regions: an outer region in which the interface does not flow, and an inner region that appears largely structure-free and freely flowing. The boundary radius, RY, between the two is determined by the surface yield stress, τsY: the interface flows for r<RY where τs>τsY, but deforms elastically for r>RY where τs<τsY. An interfacial torque balance relates applied torque to surface shear as Tapp=2πRY2τsY. Figure 4d shows that Tapp increases linearly with RY2, whose slope gives a surface yield stress τsY∼0.01 μN m−1 of order G′s/10, as expected5,28,29.
Hours-long viscoelastic recovery after steady shear
The division into flowing (yielded) and elastic regions is reminiscent of many other yield-stress materials30 whose yield stress results from an interlocking or system-spanning elastic network. Forcing such materials to flow destroys this structure, which gradually heals when the imposed shear is removed. The LC-DPPC monolayer, however, did not age in a straightforward manner once the driving torque was removed. Instead, to our great surprise, steadily sheared monolayers immediately begin to recoil and 'unwind' for minutes to even hours (Fig. 5 and Supplementary Movie 4).
Discussion
The low-frequency, linear elastic response, followed by flow at larger strains also arises in concentrated 3D emulsions, which cannot rearrange unless the applied stress is sufficiently strong to significantly deform the tightly packed droplets5. Emulsions deform elastically until a critical yield stress is applied, above which they flow: mayonnaise sits like a solid under gravity, but may be easily spread with a knife. In 3D emulsions, elastic energy is stored in droplet interfaces, giving G′s∼γ/Rd for droplets of size Rd and surface tension γ5,28,29. Extending this analogy to 2D emulsions suggests the measured surface elastic modulus G′s∼λ/Rd∼0.15 μN m−1 is set by the line tension of the domain boundaries, λ, and the size, Rd∼10 μm, of the LC domains. The resulting line tension, λ∼G′sRd∼1 pN, is in good agreement with measured values for phospholipid and fatty acid monolayers31, and is consistent with a simple molecular argument: The attractive energy between molecules in a condensed liquid phase must be of order kBT, so the energy cost of moving from an ordered to disordered liquid should be ∼kBT per molecule. Given a line density ∼1 molecule per nm, one expects a line energy λ∼kBT nm−1∼pN.
Figure 5 highlights the recovery of a monolayer that had been sheared at 60 Hz for 5 min, then allowed to relax. Domains slip relative to one another (green) or neighbouring pairs can swap (adjacent light-blue domains make way for dark-blue domains to be neighbours) through topological transitions reminiscent of T1 events in foams and concentrated emulsions5. Unlike 3D emulsions, however, highly stretched domains (red) evolve from imperceptibly thin crescents to increasingly compact structures. Such extended shapes may at first seem surprising: stretched droplets in 3D emulsions break into smaller droplets because of the Plateau–Rayleigh (capillary) instability. The absence of out-of-plane curvature in 2D, however, makes the stretched domains inherently 'stable'32,33. 2D domains can thus stretch without breaking, maintaining their integrity while slipping past each other, until they may eventually become so thin that non-hydrodynamic forces cause their rupture. Once stress is removed, the line tension of the still-continuous boundaries acts to pull the domains back into more energetically favourable compact configurations.
The dynamics of steadily sheared LC monolayers and their subsequent relaxation are generally quite complicated. If the topology of the domain structure were rigorously preserved (for example, domains could not slip, rearrange or break), the recovery would be complete and elastic, as indeed occurs for small applied rotations (Fig. 6). The relatively inviscid grain boundaries, however, allow stretched grains to slide along the slip lines that form within the yielding monolayer, swapping neighbours rather than deforming further. Nonetheless, the disc drives shear deformations that continually stretch and arrange domains in a 'wound' manner, even as they respond by slipping, rearranging and perhaps even breaking. Once shear is removed, line tension clearly drives the monolayer to recoil, whether the domains retain their topology or not. Topological changes and viscous losses thus generally give rise to a viscoelastic (partial) recovery: Figure 6 reveals the recovered (unwound) fraction to decay with applied strain by an approximate power-law −0.6.
Our measurements and observations lead us to argue that LC-DPPC monolayers—and likely grainy LC monolayers in general—behave like high-internal phase emulsions, but with novel 2D features. Line tension drives domains towards lower-energy shapes against an inhomogeneous viscous resistance: viscous grains are separated by relatively inviscid boundaries. Under small strains, the interpenetrating LC grains deform only slightly, but cooperatively, to give a viscoelastic response (Fig. 2). Large-amplitude oscillatory strains smooth the interpenetrations to form slip lines, along which localized, non-cooperative deformations occur with little resistance. If domains have not rearranged, however, 'smoothed' slip lines roughen to recover their initial (equilibrium) structure (Fig. 3). Monolayers fully yield under steady shear, forming extended (yet continuous) domains that continually slip past one another along multiple slip lines. Line tension pulls extended grains back into more compact shapes against the high LC viscosity, while grains rearrange and slide relative to one another along local slip lines.
By visualizing the structure of an interface while it is being deformed, our new technique provides an unprecedented ability to correlate structural deformations with rheological response. More generally, our technique can interrogate the dynamical response of a wide variety of fluid/fluid interfaces, of scientific, biological, industrial and technological relevance. For example, lipids, proteins and fatty acids can be added to systematically construct model monolayers of biological relevance, such as the lung surfactant monolayer4,7,17.
Methods
Fabrication of amphiphilic ferromagnetic microbuttons
We use photolithography to fabricate micron-scale, ferromagnetic, amphiphilic 'microbutton' probes, as described in detail elsewhere34. Briefly, a 4 inch diameter silicon wafer is cleaned with piranha solution, and a 200 nm sacrificial layer (Omnicoat, Microchem) is spin-coated onto the wafer at 1,000 r.p.m. for 30 s, followed by 1-μm thick photoresist (SU8-2001) at 3,000 r.p.m. for 30 s. After baking the photoresist at 95 °C for 1 min, ultraviolet light is exposed through a Chrome mask using a 5X stepper (GCA Autostep 6300 i-line). After developing the photoresist, the wafer is exposed to O2 plasma for 2 min to remove the sacrificial layer. A 150-nm nickel layer is then evaporatively deposited onto the photoresist, followed by a 10-nm gold layer. The wafer is then soaked in 1H,1H,2H,2H-perfluorooctanethiol (Sigma) for 8 h to promote the formation of a self-assembled monolayer on the gold surface. Finally, gentle sonication in water releases the microbuttons by dissolving the sacrificial layer.
Electromagnet and microbutton magnetic moment calibration
We used a Hall probe to directly measure the magnetic field established by two independently controlled pairs of electromagnets, and measured the frequency- and amplitude dependence of both the current in the coils and the magnetic field. To determine the magnetic moment of the microbuttons, we measured their dynamic response in liquids of known viscosity. Placing the microbutton at a clean, surfactant-free air/water interface (Bo=1), we measured the microbutton orientation under an applied, oscillatory magnetic field. As ζr=4πηa3 in the low-Bo (surfactant-free) limit, we extracted the magnetic moment from measured rotational resistance via m=ωθ0/B0ζr. In this manner, we measured the magnetic moments of 29 individual microbuttons, each with 150-nm Ni and 10-nm Au layers, from two different synthesis batches, and found m=(4.0±0.7)×10−10 e.m.u.
General experiment procedure
DPPC domain structures are visualized by adding 0.1 mol% of Texas red 1,2-dihexadecanoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine (DHPE, Invitrogen) to DPPC (Avanti Polar Lipids) in chloroform, which is excluded from the LC domains2,35 so that disordered, LE phases appear bright in the images. A Teflon Langmuir trough is cleaned with acetone, isopropanol and deionized water at least three times. The Langmuir trough is filled with deionized water (Milli-Q). DPPC/DHPE solution is then spread at the air/water interface with micro-syringe. Chloroform evaporates to leave a surfactant monolayer. A few drops of microbuttons in deionized water are added to the trough, centred between the electromagnets. The microbuttons do not 'see' the interface, and sink. The monolayer is compressed to the LC/LE coexistence phase (∼6 mN m−1), and a rare earth magnet is then used to pull the microbuttons from the bottom of the trough to the air/water interface, where their amphiphilic nature 'pins' them. The monolayer is then further compressed until the desired pressure, with the rigidity of the LC/LE interface preventing microbuttons from drifting out of the field of view during compression.
Two pairs of independently controlled electromagnets are used to exert a specified torque on the microbutton probe, and its resulting rotation is measured in real time by accurately locating the centroids of the buttonholes36. By exerting a known torque τ0eiωt and measuring the resulting angular displacement θ0ei(ωt+δ), we extract the rotational drag coefficient ζr(ω) from the relation iωζr(ω)θ0ei(ωt+δ)=τ0eiωt.
Relating rotational drag to rheological properties
Having measured the rotational drag coefficient of the microbutton probe, ζr(ω), we use hydrodynamic theory to extract the viscoelastic moduli that give rise to this drag. The resistance ζr(ω) is generally complex and frequency dependent, and depends on the visco(elastic) moduli of the surface and bulk phases. Just as the Stokes flow around a translating sphere must be solved to determine the steady drag of a small sphere (FD=6πηaU), the Stokes flow around a rotating disc in a surfactant monolayer must be solved37,38 to relate ζr(ω) to surface complex viscosity ηs*(ω) and subphase viscosity η. The surface viscosity and elasticity are in turn related to the complex surface modulus according to .
When Bo≫1 (which holds in the experiments reported here), the rotational resistance becomes completely dominated by the interfacial rheology, and the subphase effectively decouples from the interface. A good approximation for the drag coefficient can therefore be obtained by solving the 2D Stokes equations, and . Symmetry requires the flow be purely in the θ-direction with no pressure gradient, giving simply ∇r2uθ=0, with boundary conditions uθ=Ωa at r=a and uθ=0 as r→∞. The resulting velocity field is given by uθ=Ωa2/r, so that the torque on the disc is given by revealing the rotational resistance to be .
Author contributions
T.M.S. and S.Q.C. conceived and S.Q.C. constructed the experimental apparatus; S.S. assisted with early and complementary measurements; all authors contributed to the material design of the experiments, S.Q.C. performed all experiments and analysed the data. S.Q.C., T.M.S. and J.A.Z. wrote the manuscript.
Additional information
How to cite this article: Choi, S.Q. et al. Active microrheology and simultaneous visualization of sheared phospholipid monolayers. Nat. Commun. 2:312 doi: 10.1038/ncomms1321 (2011).
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
T.M.S. and S.Q.C. acknowledge primary support from the NSF MRSEC program (DMR-0520415), and additional support from NSF CBET-0730270, ACS PRF 47000-G7 and the Beckman Young Investigator Program. J.A.Z. and S.S. acknowledge the NIH under grants HL-51177 and GM076709. A.J. Pascall's suggestion to evaporatively deposit the magnetic film on microbuttons is gratefully acknowledged.
References
- Edwards D. A., Brenner H. & Wasan D. T. Interfacial Transport Processes and Rheology (Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston) (1991). [Google Scholar]
- Weis R. M. & McConnell H. M. Two-dimensional chiral crystals of phospholipid. Nature 310, 47–49 (1984). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Helm C. A., Mohwald H., Kjaer K. & Als-Nielsen J. Phospholipid monolayers between fluid and solid states. Biophys. J. 52, 381–390 (1987). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Clements J. A. & Avery M. E. Lung surfactant and neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 157, 59–66 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Weaire D. & Hutzler S. The Physics of Foams (Oxford University Press, 2001). [Google Scholar]
- Chandler D. Interfaces and the driving force of hydrophobic assembly. Nature 437, 640–647 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lipp M. M., Lee K. Y. C., Zasadzinski J. A. & Waring A. J. Phase and morphology changes in lipid monolayers induced by SP-B protein and its amino-terminal peptide. Science 273, 1196–1199 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dinsmore A. D. et al. Colloidosomes: selectively permeable capsules composed of colloidal particles. Science 298, 1006–1009 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Binks B. P. Particles as surfactants: similarities and differences. Curr. Opin. Colloid Int. Sci. 7, 21–41 (2002). [Google Scholar]
- Jain S. & Bates F. S. On the origins of morphological complexity in block copolymer surfactants. Science 300, 460–464 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Balazs A. C., Emrick T. & Russell T. P. Nanoparticle polymer composites: where two small worlds meet. Science 314, 1107–1110 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Langmuir I. Two-dimensional gases, liquids and solids. Science 84, 379–383 (1936). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Albrecht O., Gruler H. & Sackmann E. Polymorphism of phospholipid monolayers. J. Physique (Paris) 39, 301–313 (1978). [Google Scholar]
- Brooks C. F., Fuller G. G., Frank C. W. & Robertson C. R. An interfacial stress rheometer to study rheological transitions in monolayers at the air-water interface. Langmuir 15, 2450–2459 (1999). [Google Scholar]
- Ding J. Q., Warriner H. E. & Zasadzinski J. A. Viscosity of two-dimensional suspensions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 168102 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dhar P., Cao Y. Y., Fischer T. & Zasadzinski J. A. Active interfacial shear microrheology of aging protein films. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 016001 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Alonso C., Waring A. & Zasadzinski J. A. Keeping lung surfactant where it belongs: Protein regulation of two-dimensional viscosity. Biophys. J. 89, 266–273 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sickert M. & Rondelez F. Shear viscosity of Langmuir monolayers in the low-density limit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 126104 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Prasad V., Koehler S. A. & Weeks E. R. Two-particle microrheology of quasi-2D viscous systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 176001–176004 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee M. H., Lapointe C. P., Reich D. H., Stebe K. J. & Leheny R. L. Interfacial hydrodynamic drag on nanowires embedded in thin oil films and protein layers. Langmuir 25, 7976–7982 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gaub H. E. & McConnell H. M. Shear viscosity of monolayers at the air-water interface. J. Phys. Chem. 90, 6830–6832 (1986). [Google Scholar]
- Zakri C., Renault A. & Berge B. Comparison between macroscopic and microscopic measurements of the shear elastic constant of alcohol monolayers at the air-water interface. Physica B 248, 208–210 (1998). [Google Scholar]
- Choi S. Q. & Squires T. M. Dynamics within surfactant monolayers. Phys. Fluids 22, 091113 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bonn D. & Denn M. M. Yield stress fluids slowly yield to analysis. Science 324, 1401–1402 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Britton M. M. & Callaghan P. T. Two-phase shear band structures at uniform stress. Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 4930–4933 (1997). [Google Scholar]
- Viswanathan R., Madsen L. L., Zasadzinski J. A. & Schwartz D. K. Liquid to hexatic to crystalline order in Langmuir-Blodgett films. Science 269, 51–54 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ignes-Mullol J. & Schwartz D. K. Shear-induced molecular precession in a hexatic Langmuir monolayer. Nature 410, 348–351 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Princen H. M. Rheology of foams and highly concentrated emulsions. J. Colloid Int. Sci. 91, 160 (1983). [Google Scholar]
- Fielding S. M., Cates M. E. & Sollich P. Shear banding, aging and noise dynamics in soft, glassy materials. Soft Matter 5, 2378–2382 (2009). [Google Scholar]
- Møller P. C. F., Mewis J. & Bonn D. Yield stress and thixotropy: on the difficulty of measuring yield sresses in practice. Soft Matter 2, 274 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Trabelsi S., Zhang S., Lee T. R. & Schwartz D. K. Linactants: surfactant analogues in two dimensions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 037802 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lauger J., Robertson C. R., Frank C. W. & Fuller G. G. Deformation and relaxation processes of mono- and bilayer domains of liquid crystalline Langmuir films on water. Langmuir 12, 5630–5635 (1996). [Google Scholar]
- Leal L. G. Advanced Transport Phenomena: Fluid Mechanics and Convective Transport Processes (Cambridge University Press, 2007). [Google Scholar]
- Choi S. Q. et al. Synthesis of multifunctional micrometer-sized particles with magnetic, amphiphilic and anisotropic properties. Adv. Mater. e-pub ahead of print; doi:10.1002/adma.201003604 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Losche M., Sackmann E. & Mohwald H. A fluorescence microscopic study concerning the phase diagram of phospholipids. Ber. Bunsen-Ges. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 87, 848–852 (1983). [Google Scholar]
- Crocker J. C. & Grier D. G. Methods of digital video microscopy for colloidal studies. J. Colloid Int. Sci. 179, 298 (1996). [Google Scholar]
- Saffman P. G. Brownian motion in thin sheets of viscous fluid. J. Fluid Mech. 73, 593 (1976). [Google Scholar]
- Hughes B. D., Pailthorpe B. A. & White L. R. The translational and rotational drag on a cylinder moving in a membrane. J. Fluid Mech. 110, 349 (1981). [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.