Abstract
Cortical and central white matter (WM) volumes were measured to assess short- and long-range connectivity in autism, respectively. Subjects included 23 boys with autism and 23 matched controls, all without intellectual disability. Magnetic resonance imaging data obtained at 1.5-T were analyzed using BRAINS2 software. Central WM volume was quantified by subtracting cortical from supratentorial WM volumes. Reduced central WM volume was observed in the autism group. IQ was higher in controls with no observed correlations between WM volumes and IQ. This preliminary evidence of reduced central WM volume in autism suggests abnormal long-range connectivity.
Keywords: autism, brain, child and adolescent psychiatry, magnetic resonance imaging
INTRODUCTION
The neurobiology of autism remains unclear despite a rapidly growing body of research literature. Advances in neuroimaging methodologies examining brain–behavior relationships and their applications to the study of autism have provided considerable evidence supporting the aberrant connectivity hypothesis.1 Alterations of short- and long-distance corticocortical connectivity have been suggested.2
Structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies have provided indirect support to this hypothesis; however, abnormal connectivity has mainly been inferred by diffusion abnormalities3 and volumetric abnormalities of white matter (WM)4 or large structures, such as the corpus callosum.5 Attempts have also been made to specifically estimate short- and long-range connections. Hardan and colleagues compared gyral and sulcal thickness as indices of short-and long-range connections, respectively.6 They found an overall increase in cortical thickness in boys with autism, suggesting abnormal cortical connectivity. Herbert and colleagues reported increased WM volume in outer zone regions in boys with autism, suggesting an overabundance of short-range connections.7 While these studies suggest aberrant connectivity in autism, confirmatory studies have been limited.
The purpose of this study was to test the aforementioned connectivity hypothesis using magnetic resonance morphometric techniques to indirectly estimate short- and long-range fiber populations. We hypothesized that there would be an increase in cortical WM and a decrease in central WM, suggesting aberrant short- and long-range connectivity, respectively.
METHODS
Participants included 46 boys: 23 with autism and 23 typically developing controls. There was no significant difference in age (autism = 10.7 ± 1.6 years, control = 10.5 ± 1.3 years, t = 0.391, d.f. = 44, p = 0.698). Autism subjects met the following criteria: (i) diagnosis through clinical evaluation, Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (ADI-R),8 and Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS);9 and (ii) absence of medical/neurological disorders. Control subjects consisted of healthy individuals without intellectual disability and were evaluated by interviews, questionnaires, and observation. The Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children was administered to measure full-scale IQ (FSIQ). The Hollingshead method was used to assess socioeconomic status. While there was no significant difference in socioeconomic status (autism = 4.5 ± 0.6, control = 4.4 ± 0.6, t = 0.508, d.f. = 42, p = 0.614), FSIQ was significantly higher in controls (autism = 95 ± 20, control = 116 ± 13, t = −4.285, d.f. = 44, p < 0.001). The institutional review board approved the methodology of this study. All subjects provided verbal assent and their legal guardians provided written informed consent.
MRI scans were acquired using a 1.5-T General Electric Signa MR Scanner (Milwaukee, WI, USA). Final images were generated using T1-, T2-, and proton density (PD)-weighted images. The T1-weighted SPGR sequence was acquired using the following parameters: slice thickness = 1.5 mm, slice number = 124, echo time (TE) = 5 ms, repetition time (TR) = 24 ms, flip angle = 40°, number of excitations (NEX) = 2, field of view (FOV) = 26 cm, and matrix = 256 × 192. PD-and T2-weighted images were obtained using the following parameters: slice thickness = 5 mm, TE = 96 ms for T2 and 36 ms for PD, TR = 3000 ms, NEX = 1, FOV = 26 cm, and matrix = 256 × 192 with an echo train length = 8. Images were obtained in the coronal plane.
Image processing and analysis was performed using the BRAINS2 software package (University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA).10 Six brain-limiting points were identified to normalize the image data to standard Talairach space. The voxels representing gray matter, WM, and cerebrospinal fluid were identified using a segmentation algorithm applied to the T1-, T2-, and PD-weighted images.11 Measurements were performed using masks as generated by a neural network and corrected by manual tracing (intraclass correlation > 0.9). Analogous to the study performed by Herbert and colleagues,7 short- and long-range connectivity were operationalized by cortical and central WM volumes, respectively. Notably, central WM is an amalgamation of many different fiber types, including association, projection, and commissural fibers.12 Central WM volume was quantified by subtracting cortical WM volume from supratentorial WM volume. Total brain volume (TBV) included the cerebrum, cerebellum, and brainstem.
Statistical analyses were carried out using SPSS (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Measures were compared using Student’s t-test (p < 0.05, two-tailed). Pearson’s correlation was implemented to examine potential relationships between WM volumes and FSIQ (p < 0.05, two-tailed).
RESULTS
Reduced central WM volume was observed in the autism group; however, there was no significant difference in cortical WM (Table 1). There were no significant differences in total gray matter, total WM, and TBV (Table 1). There were also no significant correlations between regional WM volumes (cortical and central) and FSIQ in both groups (autism: rcortical, FSIQ = 0.140, p = 0.525; rcentral, FSIQ = 0.069, p = 0.753; control: rcortical, FSIQ = −0.213, p = 0.330; rcentral, FSIQ = 0.259, p = 0.233).
Table 1.
Autism | Control | Student’s t-test | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n = 23 | n = 23 | d.f. = 44 | ||||
Mean | SD | Mean | SD | T | p | |
Central White Matter | 36.7 | 4.6 | 39.2 | 3.4 | −2.079 | 0.043* |
Cortical White Matter | 368.4 | 34.8 | 383.1 | 34.2 | −1.446 | 0.155 |
Supratentorial White Matter | 405.2 | 36.1 | 422.3 | 36.3 | −1.610 | 0.115 |
Total Gray Matter | 867.4 | 83.7 | 856.9 | 67.0 | 0.470 | 0.641 |
Total White Matter | 479.9 | 42.4 | 493.2 | 47.0 | −1.005 | 0.321 |
Total Brain Volume | 1347.4 | 119.4 | 1350.1 | 102.9 | −0.084 | 0.934 |
Volumes expressed in cubic centimeters
statistically significant, p <0.05 (two-tailed)
DISCUSSION
This study provides preliminary evidence of reduced central WM volume and normal cortical WM volume in a sample of youth with autism. Implied in these findings is a reduction in long-range connectivity without significant differences in short-range connectivity. Notably, central WM consists of association, projection, and commissural fibers.12 While structural MRI studies specifically assessing association and projection fibers are limited, there is a large body of evidence suggesting abnormalities in commissural fibers, namely the corpus callosum. Therefore, the reported reduction of central WM volume is consistent with a recent meta-analysis confirming decreased corpus callosum size in autism.5 Overall, these results are concordant with the growing body of evidence converging on theories of aberrant brain connectivity in autism.1
These results differ from those reported by Herbert and colleagues who observed alterations in superficial (cortical) but not deep (central) WM volume.7 Important differences in methodology may contribute to this inconsistency with the most notable being how WM was parcellated to assess short- and long-range connections. Looking at volumes for cortical and central WM in the autism group, cortical WM is higher and central WM is lower in the current study when compared to the Herbert study. This suggests that the cortical–central boundary lies deeper in the brain in the current study. Moreover, the current study consists of 23 individuals with autism and 23 controls (N = 46) with diagnosis based on the ADI-R8 and ADOS.9 The study reported by Herbert and colleagues consists of 13 individuals with autism and 14 controls (N = 27) with diagnosis based on the Autistic Disorder Interview Checklist.
Findings reported in this study must be interpreted in the context of multiple methodological limitations. The two groups were not matched on FSIQ; however, there are no significant correlations between the WM volumes and FSIQ, making it less likely that group differences in central WM volumes are due to FSIQ. Moreover, it remains an open question whether matching for IQ is necessary in autism-related research.13 Additionally, accuracy and validity of the WM parcellation have not been confirmed by post-mortem studies. Furthermore, abnormalities in connectivity could not be confirmed by other imaging modalities. Also, the Talairach system was used for normalization of pediatric brains, though this practice is generally more problematic when accuracy is critical, such as describing coordinates of functional MRI activations.14 Finally, clinical significance of the findings is unclear because imaging findings are not linked to behavioral data.
In summary, this study provides preliminary evidence of reduced central WM volume. This finding supports a theory of aberrant long-range with possible sparing of short-range corticocortical connectivity in autism. However, abnormal gyral cortical thickness suggests that even short-range connections are affected in autism.6 Future studies applying multimodal imaging techniques, such as high-resolution structural MRI, functional MRI, and diffusion tensor imaging, would be helpful in more accurately characterizing the aberrant connectivity believed to underlie this severe developmental disorder.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by a National Institute of Mental Health grant MH064027 (Dr Hardan); American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry Pilot Research Award for Child Psychiatry Fellows supported by Lilly USA, LLC (Dr Jou); and ANA/Pfizer Fellowships in Clinical Practice from Pfizer’s Medical and Academic Partnership program (Dr Jou).
Footnotes
This article appeared in a journal published by Wiley. The attached copy is furnished for non-commercial research and education use. Other uses, including reproduction and distribution, or selling or licensing copies, or posting to personal, institutional or third party websites are prohibited.
References
- 1.Minshew NJ, Williams DL. The new neurobiology of autism: cortex, connectivity, and neuronal organization. Arch Neurol. 2007;64:945–950. doi: 10.1001/archneur.64.7.945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Courchesne E, Pierce K. Why the frontal cortex in autism might be talking only to itself: local over-connectivity but long-distance disconnection. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2005;15:225–230. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2005.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Barnea-Goraly N, Kwon H, Menon V, et al. White matter structure in autism: preliminary evidence from diffusion tensor imaging. Biol Psychiatry. 2004;55:323–326. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2003.10.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Courchesne E, Karns CM, Davis HR, et al. Unusual brain growth patterns in early life in patients with autistic disorder: an MRI study. Neurology. 2001;57:245–254. doi: 10.1212/wnl.57.2.245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Frazier TW, Hardan AY. A meta-analysis of the corpus callosum in autism. Biol Psychiatry. 2009;66:935–941. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.07.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hardan AY, Muddasani S, Vemulapalli M, et al. An MRI study of increased cortical thickness in autism. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163:1290–1292. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.163.7.1290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Herbert MR, Ziegler DA, Makris N, et al. Localization of white matter volume increase in autism and developmental language disorder. Ann Neurol. 2004;55:530–540. doi: 10.1002/ana.20032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lord C, Rutter M, Le Couteur A. Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised: a revised version of a diagnostic interview for caregivers of individuals with possible pervasive developmental disorders. J Autism Dev Disord. 1994;24:659–685. doi: 10.1007/BF02172145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lord C, Rutter M, Goode S, et al. Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule: a standardized observation of communicative and social behavior. J Autism Dev Disord. 1989;19:185–212. doi: 10.1007/BF02211841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Magnotta VA, Harris G, Andreasen NC, et al. Structural MR image processing using the BRAINS2 toolbox. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2002;26:251–264. doi: 10.1016/s0895-6111(02)00011-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.White T, Andreasen NC, Nopoulos P, Magnotta V. Gyrification abnormalities in childhood-and adolescent-onset schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry. 2003;54:418–426. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(03)00065-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Makris N, Meyer JW, Bates JF, et al. MRI-based topographic parcellation of human cerebral white matter and nuclei II. Rationale and applications with systematics of cerebral connectivity. Neuroimage. 1999;9:18–45. doi: 10.1006/nimg.1998.0384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Jarrold C, Brock J. To match or not to match? Methodological issues in autism-related research. J Autism Dev Disord. 2004;34:81–86. doi: 10.1023/b:jadd.0000018078.82542.ab. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Wilke M, Schmithorst VJ, Holland SK. Assessment of spatial normalization of whole-brain magnetic resonance images in children. Hum Brain Mapp. 2002;17:48–60. doi: 10.1002/hbm.10053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]