Skip to main content
Plant Signaling & Behavior logoLink to Plant Signaling & Behavior
. 2010 Nov 1;5(11):1423–1424. doi: 10.4161/psb.5.11.13292

Role of nitric oxide in thermotolerance

Liqun Zhao 1,, Yi Xuan 1, Shuo Zhou 1, Lei Wang 1, Haijun Jiang 1
PMCID: PMC3115244  PMID: 21057186

Abstract

A tCaM3 is a key factor in heat shock (HS) signal transduction. Nitric oxide (NO) is believed to mediate a variety of resistant reactions against environmental factors. Our experiments indicate that under heat stress NO induces thermotolerance. In order to do so, NO is signal molecule acting upstream of AtCaM3, stimulating the DNA-binding activity of HS transcription factors as well as the accumulation of heat shock proteins. As a novel HS signaling molecule, NO signal pathway is little known and several unexpected results are emerging. Herein we are discussing them and conclude that in order to obtain a more profound understanding of this new role of NO, detailed research will be needed in the future.

Key words: Arabidopsis thaliana, nitric oxide, thermotolerance, heat shock protein


Nitric oxide is a signaling molecule extensively involving in plant normal growth and development in a concentration-dependent manner. The involvement of NO in thermotolerance was reported by Lee et al.1 In this paper, they found that hot5 (encodes S-nitrosoglutathione reductase)-null mutants showed increased nitrate and nitroso species levels and the heat sensitivity of both missense and null alleles was associated with increased NO species levels. Heat sensitivity was enhanced in wildtype and mutant plants by NO donors and the heat sensitivity of the hot5 mutants was successfully rescued by an NO scavenger. Thus, they proposed that enhancement of the NO level induced heat sensitivity in Arabidopsis.1 In previous works, NO was always found to enhance plant resistance against environmental factors, including drought, salt stress, disease, etc.2 Low and high NO concentration might induce the ambivalent reaction in plant tissue. So we have tried a series of low concentrations of sodium nitroprusside (SNP) as NO donor to treat Arabidopsis seedlings. The result is surprising and exciting that application of SNP greatly increased survival rates of the seedlings, even 100 µM SNP for nearly 100% survival rate (Fig. 1), indicating the possibility of NO stimulating thermotolerance.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Effect of SNP on survival rates of Arabidopsis seedlings. (A) Six-day-old wild-type seedlings grown at 22°C were pretreated with 1 mL of a different concentrations (1, 0 mM; 2, 10 mM; 3, 20 mM; 4, 50 mM; or 5, 100 mM) of SNP as an NO donor. After 24 h, they were exposed to 45°C for 60 min, then returned to 22°C and photographed 6 d later. (B) Survival ratios of the seedlings. The data are the mean ± SE of at least four independent experiments, with 50 seedlings per experiment.

To verify this suggestion, noa1(rif1) (for nitric oxide associated1/resistant to inhibition by fosmidomycin1), which exhibits reduced endogenous NO levels, was used to examine the relationship between NO and heat stress. Our data indicate that NO functions as a second messenger in the induction of thermotolerance through AtCaM3, which is dependent on the enhancement of HSF DNA binding activity and HSP accumulation.3 In combination with the results of high NO level reducing thermotolerance from Lee et al.,1 we suggest that NO homeostasis is a key factor affecting the initiation of resistant reactions to heat stress.

Also, we found a strange phenomenon that different sensitivity to NO existed between wild-type and noa1(rif1) mutant seedlings under HS. Under 20 µM SNP treatment, survival rate of noa1(rif1) seedlings reached the maximum value (as shown in Fig. 2 of the original paper), whereas it of wild-type seedlings was the highest in the present of 100 µM SNP (Fig. 1). This may be due to the nature of NOA1(RIF1), which is only associated with NO biosynthesis,4,5 such that supplementation with NO alone could not fully rescue the thermotolerance of the noa1(rif1) mutant equal to that of wild type.

We used NO inhibitors, Nω-nitro-larginine and 2-phenyl-4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-imidazoline-1-oxyl-3-oxyde, to treat the seedlings and expected to find their inhibition to thermotolerance as the reverse proof of the supplement of NO. However, the result showed that they could not decrease survival rates of the seedlings even the rather high concentrations (data not shown). Later experiments indicated that it might be due to increased NOA1(RIF1) expression to keep a fixed NO concentration in plant (data not shown), indicating that a stable internal NO level is crucial at this special developmental stage.

Though we have documented the involvement of NO in HS, there are several important issues awaiting further studies such as its signaling pathways, source(s) of NO, interactions of NO with cytosolic Ca2+ and effects of NO on adult plants. These need our further and detailed research.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Ph.D. Programs Foundation of Ministry of Education of China (20091303120005).

Addendum to: Xuan Y, Zhou S, Wang L, Cheng Y, Zhao L. Nitric oxide functions as a signal and acts upstream of AtCaM3 in thermotolerance in Arabidopsis seedlings. Plant Physiol. 2010;153:1895–1906. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.160424.

Footnotes

References

  • 1.Lee U, Wie C, Fernandez BO, Feelisch M, Vierling E. Modulation of nitrosative stress by S-nitrosoglutathione reductase is critical for thermotolerance and plant growth in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2008;20:786–802. doi: 10.1105/tpc.107.052647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Leitner M, Vandelle E, Gaupels F, Bellin D, Delledonne M. NO signals in the haze: Nitric oxide signalling in plant defense. Curr Opin Plant Sci. 2009;12:451–458. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2009.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Xuan Y, Zhou S, Wang L, Cheng Y, Zhao L. Nitric oxide functions as a signal and acts upstream of AtCaM3 in thermotolerance in Arabidopsis seedling. Plant Physiol. 2010;153:1895–1906. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.160424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Crawford NM, Galli M, Tischner R, Heimer YM, Okamoto M, Mack A. Response to Zemojtel, et al.: plant nitric oxide synthase: back to square one. Trends Plant Sci. 2006;11:526–527. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Zemojtel T, Fröhlich A, Palmieri MC, Kolanczyk M, Mikula I, Wyrwicz LS, et al. Plant nitric oxide synthase: a never-ending story? Trends Plant Sci. 2006;11:524–525. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2006.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Signaling & Behavior are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES