Skip to main content
Genetics and Molecular Biology logoLink to Genetics and Molecular Biology
. 2011 Apr 1;34(2):220–224. doi: 10.1590/S1415-47572011005000009

Intraspecific crosses resulting in the first occurrence of eight and nine B chromosomes in Prochilodus lineatus (Characiformes, Prochilodontidae)

Tatiana Aparecida Voltolin 1, José Augusto Senhorini 2, Fausto Foresti 3, Jehud Bortolozzi 1, Fábio Porto-Foresti 1,
PMCID: PMC3115313  PMID: 21734820

Abstract

B chromosomes are supernumerary elements present in about 15% of eukaryotic species and are most frequently heterochromatic, behave parasitically, show a transmission rate higher than standard (A) chromosomes, and can provoke harmful effects on carriers. In the current work, Prochilodus lineatus individuals carrying eight and nine B chromosomes were obtained by induced crossing performed involving breeders with different B chromosome numbers in their cells. The high B chromosome numbers found in the offspring were recorded for the first time in this species. The use of cytogenetic techniques applied in the present study revealed that regardless of the increase in number of B chromosomes in the genome of these individuals, those elements did not presented active genes, and showed their normal heterochromatic characteristic.

Keywords: supernumerary chromosome, heterochromatic chromosome, cross-fertilization

Introduction

Prochilodus lineatus, a fish species of the family Prochilodontidae, is considered one of the most important components of commercial and subsistence fishery in freshwater environments in South America, with the exception of Chile, where this species is not found (Lowe-McConnell, 1975; Goulding, 1981; Vari, 1983). Amongst all the species of this genus, P. lineatus, popularly known as curimbatá, is certainly the most-studied species so far in this region (Godoy, 1975). Furthermore, this species presents an optimal adaptation to growth and reproduction in captivity, thus becoming highly interesting for fish culture programs (Britski, 1972; Godoy, 1975; Castro, 1993).

The chromosomal organization of P. lineatus has been described in previous cytogenetic studies (Pauls and Bertollo, 1983,Pauls and Bertollo, 1990; Oliveira et al., 1997; Cavallaro et al., 2000; Jesus and Moreira-Filho, 2003; Artoni et al., 2006; Vicari et al., 2006; Voltolin et al., 2009). The karyotype of this species consists of 54 meta/submetacentric chromosomes and may present from zero to seven B microchromosomes that vary between and also within populations (Jesus and Moreira-Filho, 2003).

A surprisingly diverse occurrence of B chromosomes in Neotropical fishes is found among representatives of the order Characiformes, where this extra-genomic element has been found in 31 species in six distinct families: Anostomidae, Characidae, Crenuchidae, Curimatidae, Parodontidae, and Prochilodontidae (Carvalho et al., 2008), which represent 50.82% of all the species carrying B chromosomes. They show a considerable variability in relation to size, morphology, and number.

Based on the occurrence of different frequencies of supernumerary chromosomes already reported in P. lineatus, our purpose in this study was to contribute to the knowledge about frequency variation in filial generations and its maintenance in individuals obtained from oriented crosses carried out in individuals maintained at the CEPTA/ICMBio, Pirassununga, SP, Brazil.

Material and Methods

41 individuals of the P. lineatus species (three parents – one male and two females – and 38 individuals representing the two filial generations) were cytogenetically analyzed. In the cross-fertilization carried out in the CEPTA/ICMBio facilities, three parents captured from the natural population of the Mogi-Guaçu River, Pirassununga, SP, Brazil, were used. The single male was simultaneously crossed with two females, originating two filial generations by cross-fertilization were. The filial generation A composed of 12 and filial generation B of 26 individuals.

Chromosome preparations from kidney tissue were obtained following the method of Foresti et al. (1993). For the establishment of the modal number of B chromosomes, 30 cells with 2n = 54 A chromosomes from each individual were analyzed. Nucleolar organizer regions (NOR) were identified on the chromosome complement using the silver nitrate staining technique developed by Howell and Black (1980), and constitutive heterochromatin patterns on chromosome preparations were obtained following the method of Sumner (1972).

Results

The karyotypic constitution of the three parents used in the cross-fertilization exhibited a diploid number of 2n = 54 chromosomes of metacentric and submetacentric types with a fundamental number equal to 108, with interindividual variation in the presence of B chromosomes, the male having six B chromosomes; one of the females had four and the other five.

The two filial generations resulting from these two crosses (Figure 1a, b) showed no differences concerning diploid number, chromosome type, and fundamental number and all the 38 individuals comprising the progenies exhibited supernumerary chromosomes. Twelve individuals of filial generation A (Figure 1a), originating from the cross involving the male with six B chromosomes and the female with four B chromosomes, presented four individuals carrying three B (30.7%), two individuals carrying four B (15.4%); five individuals carrying six B (46.2%), and finally, one individual carrying eight B chromosomes (Figure 2a), corresponding to 7.7% of the total individuals analyzed. Among the 26 individuals of filial generation B (Figure 1b), originating from the cross involving the male with six and the female with five B chromosomes, presented two individuals carrying three B (7.6%); three individuals carrying four B (11.7%); 13 individuals carrying five B (50%); one individual with seven B (3.8%); two individuals carrying eight B chromosomes (Figure 2a) (7.6%), and finally, one individual carrying nine B chromosomes, representing 3.8% of the total (Figure 2b).

Figure 1-.

Figure 1-

Proportions of B chromosomes present in the F1 generation resulting from induced crosses of the respective parental generation.

Figure 2-.

Figure 2-

Metaphases of Prochilodus lineatus showing the presence of eight (a) and nine (b) B chromosomes; metaphases showing the presence of the Nucleolar Organizer Region (NOR) in the chromosomes of individuals with eight (c) and nine (d) B chromosomes; and metaphases after C-banding showing the presence of heterochromatic blocks in the chromosomes of individuals with eight (e) and nine (f) B chromosomes. Scale bars: 10 μm.

Aiming at a better cytogenetic characterization of the individuals carrying eight and nine B chromosomes, the technique for the detection of nucleolar organizer regions by silver nitrate impregnation was applied, revealing the characteristic labeling on the long arm of the third largest submetacentric chromosome pair of the karyotype in all individuals of P. lineatus analyzed (Figure 2c,d). Moreover, size polymorphism was detected involving this region in the homologous chromosomes.

Staining with the C-banding technique revealed conspicuous heterochromatic blocks in the centromeric regions of the chromosome complement and in the telomeric region of one chromosome pair. All the supernumerary chromosomes revealed to be completely or partially heterochromatic (Figure 2e,f).

Discussion

The genus Prochilodus (Prochilodontidae) exhibits a relatively conserved karyotypic structure with 2n = 54 metacentric and submetacentric chromosomes (Pauls and Bertollo, 1990; Fenocchio et al., 2003). However, some Prochilodus species show variation in chromosome number attributed to the occurrence of supernumerary or B chromosomes. Previous reports on the presence and number per cell of these genomic elements revealed that from zero to seven units can easily be identified as heterochromatic microchromosomes in this species (Pauls and Bertollo, 1983; Oliveira et al., 1997; Cavallaro et al., 2000).

Since their discovery at the beginning of the last century (Wilson, 1907), the maintenance of B chromosomes in nature has been thoroughly considered (Jones and Rees, 1982; Jones, 1995; Camacho et al., 2000; Puertas, 2002). The present work registered the presence of eight and nine B chromosomes in individuals of the filial generations of P. lineatus (Figure 2a,b) obtained by cross-fertilization. This new variation in the number of supernumerary chromosomes has not been observed previously in individuals of this species, either in nature or in fish culture.

Through induced reproduction in P. lineatus, it was ascertained that the B chromosome maintenance is associated with the number of supernumerary chromosomes present in the parental gametes. When large numbers of B chromosomes were present in the ancestors’ haploid cells, the individuals originating from these crosses presented a considerable number of B chromosomes. In nature, the occurrence of eight and nine B chromosomes had not yet been registered, because finding individuals with a large number of microchromosomes in their genome is very rare, since the modal number for this species ranges from two to three extra elements (Voltolin et al., 2009). Moreover, it is most unlikely that gametes carrying a high number of B chromosomes would be found as a result of chance occurrences among the individuals of these natural populations. However, the obtaining of filial generations of P. lineatus in captivity demonstrated that these individuals are able to carry a great number of B in their genome.

The maximum number of B chromosomes that a species is capable of tolerating can measured by the maximum number of B chromosomes found in adult individuals in a population (Camacho et al., 2000). Any extra genomic element possessing an accumulation mechanism would be able to evolve into a B chromosome. Such a characteristic parasitic B would be rapidly increased in frequency to the point of becoming a burden to the host genome (Camacho et al., 2000). Some forms of resistance to the increase in B chromosome number in the cells have evolved in several species. Indirect evidence for such resistance comes from variable transmission rates for B chromosomes among individuals within the same population, which suggests a possible influence of A chromosome background on the expression of B drive. The existence of such intraspecific variability in B chromosome transmission rates has long been known in species such as rye (Müntzing, 1954), Festuca pratensis (Bosemark, 1954), maize (Carlson, 1969), Myrmeleotettix maculates (Hewitt, 1973), and Hypochoeris maculate (Parker et al., 1982).

Many attempts to estimate the effects of chromosomes on fitness have been made (Jones and Rees, 1982; Shaw and Hewitt 1990; Beukeboom, 1994). In most organisms, B chromosomes are considered as selfish genomic elements. One of the exceptions known so far is found in the chive Allium schoenoprasum, in which seeds carrying even a small number of B chromosomes survive to seedling better than those lacking them (Holmes and Bougourd, 1989) and there was no evidence of B chromosome drive in this species (Bougourd and Parker, 1979). Among Neotropical fish species that present supernumerary chromosomes, no evidence was found supporting the occurrence of adaptive effects due to the extra elements (Carvalho et al., 2008).

There is a wide variety of accumulation mechanisms in which B chromosomes can assure their maintenance in natural populations (Jones, 1991). One is the mitotic instability of B chromosomes coupled with preferential destiny of cells with higher B number towards the germ line. This mechanism was proposed by Nur (1969) for B chromosomes in several grasshopper species, and has been analyzed in detail in the locust Locusta migratoria (Nur, 1969; Kayano, 1971; Pardo et al., 1995).

Aiming at understanding B chromosome transmission and maintenance patterns, several studies have been conducted. Jones and Rees (1982) showed that in two species rye from the Lago di Garlate, the offspring had more B chromosomes than their parents, indicating a net increase in the frequency within the population. However, the frequency of B chromosomes in parents might have been underestimated because of mitotic instability, as B chromosomes can be lost from somatic tissue but still be present in the germ line. Such mitotically unstable B chromosomes were found in grasshoppers (Rothfels, 1950; Nur, 1969; Kayano, 1971; Pardo et al., 1994) and Polycelis tenuis (Melander, 1950).

The analysis of the nucleolar organizer regions (NORs) location confirmed the findings of Maistro et al. (2000), who described labeling on the long arm of the third chromosome pair, besides a frequent NOR size polymorphism. Jesus and Moreira-Filho (2003) detected one or two additional inactive small sites in another sample analyzed, and Vicari et al. (2006) identified a NOR near the centromere in the interstitial region of the long arm of the fourth chromosome pair. In this work, all the individuals presented a NOR marking on the third submetacentric chromosome pair and no additional ribosomal site was found.

The pattern of constitutive heterochromatin in P. lineatus was described by Maistro et al. (2000) as generally located in the centromeric region of the chromosomes in the A complement of this species, but the presence of constitutive heterochromatin in the telomeric regions was also observed. In the present work, heterochromatic blocks were identified in the centromeric regions of all chromosomes, and only one chromosome pair presented heterochromatin in the telomeric region. All B chromosomes were found to be completely heterochromatic, confirming data previously described for this species. The increase in the number of B chromosomes in P. lineatus does not appear to have any effect on their heterochromatic nature. By contrast, Artoni et al. (2006) observed a small negative C-band segment in the pericentromeric region of a metacentric B chromosome.

Our results showed that, through induced and controlled reproduction, it is possible to alter the frequency of B chromosomes in P. lineatus, thus opening the question as to which would be the maximum number of B chromosomes that such a species is able to carry in its genome without becoming a burden. Irrespective of the increase in number, no active genes were found located on B chromosomes in this species, and apparently the increase in heterochromatin in the genome does not seem to affect any cell functions.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Renato Devidé for technical support, and to Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) and Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) for financial support.

Footnotes

Associate Editor: Yatiyo Yonenaga-Yassuda

References

  1. Artoni RF, vicari MR, Endler AL, Cavallaro zi, Jesus cm, Almeida mc, Moreira-Filho O, Bertollo LAC. Banding pattern of A and B chromosome of Prochilodus lineatus (Characiformes, Prochilodontidae), with comments on B chromosome evolution. Genetica. 2006;127:277–284. doi: 10.1007/s10709-005-4846-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Beukeboom LW. Bewildering Bs: An impression of the 1st B-chromosome Conference. Heredity. 1994;73:328–336. [Google Scholar]
  3. Britski Ha. Peixes de água doce do estado de São Paulo. Sistemática. 1972;36:79–108. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bosemark NO. On accessory chromosomes in Festuca pratensis. II. Inheritance of the standard type of accessory chromosome. Hereditas. 1954;40:425–437. [Google Scholar]
  5. Bougourd SM, Parker JS. The B-chromosome system of Allium shoenoprassum. Chromosoma. 1979;75:369–383. [Google Scholar]
  6. Camacho JPM, Sharbel TF, Beukeboom LW. B-chromosome evolution. Phil Trans R Soc London. 2000;355:163–178. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2000.0556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Carlson W. Factors affecting preferential fertilization in maize. Genetics. 1969;62:638–639. doi: 10.1093/genetics/62.3.543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Carvalho RA, Martins-Santos IC, Dias AL. B chromosomes: An update about their occurrence in freshwater Neotropical fishes (Teleostei) J Fish Biol. 2008;72:1907–1932. [Google Scholar]
  9. Castro RMC. Prochilodus britskii, a new species of Prochilodontide Fish (Ostariophysi, Characiformes) from the rio Apiacá, river Tapajós system, Mato Grosso, Brazil. Proc Biol Soc Wash. 1993;106:57–62. [Google Scholar]
  10. Cavallaro ZI, Bertollo LAC, Perfectti F, Camacho JPM. Frequency increase and mitotic stabilization of a B chromosome in fish Prochilodus lineatus. Chromosome Res. 2000;8:627–634. doi: 10.1023/a:1009242209375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fenocchio AS, Pastori MC, Roncati HA, Moreira-Filho O, Bertollo LAC. A cytogenetic survey of the fish fauna from Argentina. Caryologia. 2003;56:197–204. [Google Scholar]
  12. Foresti F, Oliveira C, Almeida-Toledo LF. A method for chromosome preparations from large specimens of fishes using in vitro short treatment with colchicine. Experientia. 1993;49:810–813. [Google Scholar]
  13. Godoy MP. Peixes do Brasil: Sub-ordem Characoidei. Editora Franciscana; Piracicaba: 1975. pp. 629–847. [Google Scholar]
  14. Goulding M. Man and fisheries on an Amazon frontier. Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1981. p. 137. [Google Scholar]
  15. Hewitt GM. Variable transmission rates of a B chromosome in Myrmeleotettix maculatus (Thunb.) Chromosoma. 1973;40:83–106. doi: 10.1007/BF00319837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Holmes DS, Bougourd SM. The B chromosome selection in Allium shoenoprasum. I. Natural population. Heredity. 1989;63:83–87. [Google Scholar]
  17. Howell WM, Black DA. Controlled silver-staining of nucleolus organizer regions with a protective colloidal developer: A 1-step method. Experientia. 1980;36:1014–1015. doi: 10.1007/BF01953855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Jesus CM, Moreira-Filho O. Chromosomal localization of 5S and 18S rRNA genes in Prochilodus lineatus (Characiformes, Prochilodontidae) Caryologia. 2003;56:281–287. [Google Scholar]
  19. Jones RN. B-Chromosome drive. Am Nat. 1991;137:430–442. [Google Scholar]
  20. Jones RN. Tansley review no. 85: B chromosomes in plants. New Phytol Trust. 1995;131:411–434. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1995.tb03079.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Jones RN, Rees H. B Chromosomes. Academic Press; New York: 1982. p. 266. [Google Scholar]
  22. Kayano H. Accumulation of B chromosomes in the germ-line of Locusta migratoria. Heredity. 1971;27:119–1123. [Google Scholar]
  23. Lowe-McConell R. Fish communities in tropical freshwaters. Longman; New York: 1975. p. 337. [Google Scholar]
  24. Maistro LM, Oliveira C, Foresti F. Cytogenetic analysis of A and B chromosomes of Prochilodus lineatus (Teleostei, Prochilodontidae) using different restriction enzyme banding and staining methods. Genetica. 2000;108:119–125. doi: 10.1023/a:1004063031965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Melander Y. Accessory chromosomes in animals especially in Polycelis tenuis. Hereditas. 1950;36:19–38. [Google Scholar]
  26. Müntzing AS. Cytogenetics of accessory chromosomes (B-chromosomes) Caryologia. 1954;6:282–301. [Google Scholar]
  27. Nur U. Mitotic instability leading to an acumulation of B-chromosomes in grasshoppers. Chromosoma. 1969;27:1–19. doi: 10.1007/BF00326108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Oliveira C, Saboya SMR, Foresti F, Senhorini JA, Bernardino G. Increased B chromosome frequency and absence of drive in the fish Prochilodus lineatus. Heredity. 1997;79:473–476. [Google Scholar]
  29. Pardo MC, López-León MD, Cabrero J, Camacho JPM. Transmission analysis of mitotically unstable B chromosomes in Locusta migratoria. Genome. 1994;37:1027–1034. doi: 10.1139/g94-146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Pardo MC, López-León MD, Hewitt GM, Camacho JPM. Female fitness is increased by frequent mating in grasshoppers. Heredity. 1995;74:654–660. [Google Scholar]
  31. Parker JS, Taylor S, Ainsworth CC. The chromosome system of Hypochoeris maculata. III. Variation in B-chromosome transmission rates. Chromosoma. 1982;84:229–310. [Google Scholar]
  32. Pauls E, Bertollo LAC. Evidence for a system of supranumerary chromosomes in Prochilodus scrofa Steindacher 1881 (Pisces Prochilodontidae) Caryologia. 1983;36:307–314. [Google Scholar]
  33. Pauls E, Bertollo LAC. Distribution of a supranumerary chromosome system and aspects of caryotipic evolution in the genus Prochilodus (Pisces, Prochilodontidae) Genetica. 1990;8:117–123. [Google Scholar]
  34. Puertas MJ. Nature and evolution of chromosome in plants: A non-cod but information-rich part of plant genomes. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2002;96:198–205. doi: 10.1159/000063047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Rothfels KH. Chromosome complement, polyploidy and supernumeraries in Neopodismopsis abdominalis. Chromosomes Today. 1950;1:28–30. doi: 10.1002/jmor.1050870205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Shaw MW, Hewitt GM. B chromosomes, selfish DNA and theoretical models: Where next? In: Futuyma D, Antonovics J, editors. Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology . Oxford University Press; Oxford: 1990. pp. 197–223. [Google Scholar]
  37. Sumner AT. Chromosome Banding. Unwin Hyman Inc; Cambridge: 1972. p. 434. [Google Scholar]
  38. Vari RP. Phylogenetic relationships of the families Curimatidae, Prochilodontidae, Anostomidae and Chilodontidae (Pisces, Characiformes) Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology. Smithsonian Institution Press; Washington: 1983. p. 378. [Google Scholar]
  39. Vicari MR, Almeida MC, Bertollo LAC, Moreira-Filho Oand Artoni RF. Cytogenetic analysis and chromosomal characteristics of the polymorphic 18S rDNA in the fish Prochilodus lineatus (Characiformes Prochilodontidae) Genet Mol Biol. 2006;29:621–625. [Google Scholar]
  40. Voltolin TA, Senhorini JA, Oliveira C, Foresti F, Bortolozzi J, Porto-Foresti F. Utilization of cytogenetic markers in wild population of curimbatá (Prochilodus lineatus) from Mogi-Guaçu River. Cytologia. 2009;74:281–287. [Google Scholar]
  41. Wilson EB. The supernumerary chromosomes of Hemiptera. Science. 1907;26:870–871. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics and Molecular Biology are provided here courtesy of Sociedade Brasileira de Genética

RESOURCES