Abstract
Introduction
The number of microorganism strains with resistance to known antimicrobials is increasing. Therefore, there is a high demand for new, non-toxic and efficient antimicrobial agents. Research with the microscopic nematode Caenorhabditis elegans can address this high demand for the discovery of new antimicrobial compounds. In particular, C. elegans can be used as a model host for in vivo drug discovery through high-throughput screens of chemical libraries.
Areas covered
This review introduces the use of substitute model hosts and especially C. elegans in the study of microbial pathogenesis. The authors also highlight recently published literature on the role of C. elegans in drug discovery and outline its use as a promising host with unique advantages in the discovery of new antimicrobial drugs.
Expert opinion
C. elegans can be used, as a model host, to research many diseases, including fungal infections and Alzheimer’s disease. In addition, high-throughput techniques, for screening chemical libraries, can also be facilitated. Nevertheless, C. elegans and mammals have significant differences that both limit the use of the nematode in research and the degree by which results can be interpreted. That being said, the use of C. elegans in drug discovery still holds promise and the field continues to grow, with attempts to improve the methodology already underway.
Keywords: Caenorhabditis elegans, Candida albicans, drug discovery, high throughput, model host
1. Introduction
Sydney Brenner first introduced C. elegans in research in the 1960s and 1970s[1]. C. elegans is a free soil-living nematode with length of 1 mm and a diameter of 50 µm. Each C. elegans hermaphrodite is made up of 959 cells, including a nervous system which consists of 302 nerve cells, 213 hypodermis cells, and 34 intestine cells. C. elegans has an average life span of approximately 2–3 weeks and a reproduction time of 3.5 days[2]. Hermaphrodite nematodes produce both oocytes and sperm.
In the laboratory setting, C. elegans can be easily maintained on nematode growth medium agar, fed on the nonpathogenic bacterium Escherichia coli OP50 strain, and preserved at −80 °C. For experimental purposes, C. elegans is easy to store and handle with relatively small cost, and can be utilized with both solid and liquid medium. The nematode is transparent, allowing fluorescent compound tracing inside its body. Because of their small size, C. elegans nematodes can be placed in 96- or 384-well plates for high throughput experiments. Moreover, C. elegans has a fully sequenced genome[3, 4] and there are decreased ethical concerns involved in their use compared to mammals. Also, C. elegans can be genetically modified easily[5]. There is a website that provides the genetic data of C. elegans[5–10] and the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center (CGC) at the University of Minnesota provides many strains at minimal charge.
2. C. elegans in drug discovery
2.1 Antifungal drugs identified using C. elegans
Candida albicans is the most common pathogenic fungal infection and the fourth most common blood-stream infection[11, 12]. The cost of infections reaches $1 billion per year, and the average cost of dealing with a case of systemic candidiasis in 1997 was estimated at $34,123–44,536[13, 14]. The development of resistant strains to conventional antifungal agents, and even newer generations of antifungal agents such as echinocandins[15], have made research for new antifungal compounds essential[16–18]. Interestingly, patients who have been under antifungal therapy for a long time, such as those with immunodeficiency, are most likely to be the sources for resistant strains[18–20].
C. albicans can cause a lethal infection in C. elegans[21]. The infection process in C. elegans involves the formation of filaments, the same process as C. albicans infection in humans[22, 23]. Conventional human antifungal agents against C. albicans increase the survival of the nematodes when they are infected with C. albicans. Importantly, assays have been designed to utilize the C. albicans-C. elegans system in high throughput screening to test libraries of compounds for their activity as antifungal agents[21, 24].
To create the C. albicans-C. elegans assays, pre-infection[21] or co-inoculation methods[24] can be used. These two methods have different features. The co-inoculation method uses 96-well non-binding half area plates, on which we first transfer liquid screen medium and the specific compound that we want to examine for its antifungal activity. Next we transfer the nematodes, which have been grown earlier, and finally we place C. albicans. In other words, the infection of the nematode by C. albicans takes place in the plates, not before their placement in the plates. This method differs from pre-infection, in which the nematodes are infected with C. albicans and then are transferred to the plates, where they will be exposed to the compound. In the pre-infection method, the nematodes are transferred on C. albicans lawns for 2 hours before being transferred to the plates.
The co-infection method is superior to the pre-infection method for several reasons. First, the pre-infection method is disadvantageous because the tool which is used to move the nematodes that are contaminated with C. albicans becomes contaminated with C. albicans, forming a biofilm which is difficult to remove and complicates cleaning the tool. Moreover, a possible automated dispensing system will improve the reliability and uniformity of the assay. In addition, less time is required for co-infection experiments, as no extra time is required for the infection. Third, some materials which are used with the pre-infection methodology are not necessary with the co-infection methodology, such as those required for the infection of the nematodes by C. albicans, and for their collection and transfer into other plates. Finally, the similarity between the survival of the nematodes in both experiments has been established: in experiments with both methodologies the nematodes died after 4 days or more, and the development of filamentations by C. albicans in the dead nematodes was observed, indicating that the co-inoculation method can be used in place of the pre-infection method.
Using these assays, 1266 chemical compounds were screened and 15 compounds identified that can increase the survival of C. elegans infected with C. albicans and prevent in vivo filamentation[23] of C. albicans[21]. Also the compounds were evaluated for their toxicity on the C. elegans. An example of these compounds is Caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE), a component of honeybee propolis, which was further tested in a murine model of candidiasis and showed antifungal activity in experimental mice with systemic candidiasis. CAPE inhibits the NF-kappaB protein (nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells) in mammals and has immunomodulatory features. However, because C. elegans does not have an NF-kappaB homologue, it is possible CAPE affects the immune system of C. elegans via a different mechanism. Hence, the C. elegans has many differences with the mammals but this is not a major drawback to the use of the nematode system for initial steps of drug discovery.
In subsequent research, the C. elegans-C. albicans assay was modified and improved and an extra 3228 compounds were tested[24]. Of these, 1948 were FDA-approved drugs and the remaining 1280 were small molecules from a diverse group of chemicals that have various actions. 19 compounds were detected which increased the survival of the nematodes after infection with C. albicans. Some of these were already known as antifungal agents, confirming the reliability of the assay. Additionally, some compounds may have had antifungal activity, but could not be detected because either they have nematicidal activity apart from their antifungal activity, or they have limited solubility in water, which was used in the experiment. Another possibility is that some compounds may not have had activity against C. albicans but have activity against other types of fungi. Out of the 19 compounds which were found to have an antifungal activity, some of these were immunomodulators, such as cyclosporine A, ascomycin, and FK-506 (tacrolimus). Their antifungal activity was found to be weak, but in high quantities they had a considerable action and could offer 50% survival to the nematode. It has been shown that immunomodulator compounds synergistically act with known antifungal compounds in curing fungal infections. Their mechanism of action is through disrupting the action of calcineurin, which is involved in C. albicans survival in the serum and in the development of resistance to azoles. Another compound which was identified was triadimeron which acts through blocking the synthesis of ergosterol (the fungi cell wall component). Furthermore, the compound dequalinium chloride was identified, which is an anti-tumor and protein kinase C inhibitor. This compound prevents the integrity of the cell wall of C. albicans through the Rho 1-PKC (protein kinase c) pathway. Finally, the compound concanamycin A was also detected, which is a Vacuolar-type H+-ATPase inhibitor (Table 1).
Table 1.
Compounds identified using C. elegans for preclinical drug discovery
Compound name |
Active against |
Reference | Compound name |
Active against |
Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Enoxacin | C. albicans | [21] | Triadimeron | C. albicans | [24] |
CAPE | C. albicans | [21] | Dequalinium chloride | C. albicans | [24] |
Cyclosporine A | C. albicans | [24] | Concanamycin A | C. albicans | [24] |
Ascomycin | C. albicans | [24] | A2 Sakurasosaponin | C. albicans | [25] |
FK-506 | C. albicans | [24] | A8 | C. albicans | [25] |
A16 Aginoside | C. albicans | [25] | A19 | C. albicans | [25] |
A24 | C. albicans | [25] | A25 | C. albicans | [25] |
A11 | C. albicans | [25] | A17 | C. albicans | [25] |
A20 | C. albicans | [25] | A21 | C. albicans | [25] |
A7 | C. albicans | [25] | Nemadipine A | E. faecalis | [34] |
The same modified assay has been used to test various natural products for their antifungal activity[25]. Saponins are natural products isolated from plants. 12 saponins were identified as antifungal agents (Table 1). Two of the saponins were studied further. From this study it has been found that the C. albicans hyphae and biofilm formation are interrupted by the saponins. To further test the toxicity of these saponins, a hemolysis assay was conducted and no hemolysis was detected for any of the saponins. Therefore the saponins prefer to bind to ergosterol rather than cholesterol. Furthermore, it has been noted that treating the C. albicans cells with saponins can make them more susceptible to osmotic stress applied by salt. Notably the mechanism of action of saponins is to increase the cell permeability. Therefore, it increases the penetration of other compounds such as photosensitizers and increases the susceptibility of fungi to photodynamic therapy. This therapy utilizes a dye, the photosensitizer, that is not toxic, and a low intensity light. When oxygen is present, the combination of these is cytotoxic.
Interestingly, the comparison of MIC (minimum inhibitory concentration) and EC50 (half maximal effective concentration) can be used in C. elegans assays to detect compounds that have a greater antimicrobial activity when they are used in vivo. This means that the particular compound acts not only against virulence factors but may alter the immune response of the organism against the infection. An example of this is the compound caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE), as mentioned above. CAPE inhibits the development of C. albicans both in vivo and in vitro. This compound was found to have higher MIC than EC50, 64 mg/ml and 4mg/ml respectively, indicating that this compound has a greater effectiveness in vivo than in vitro[21]. This led to the hypothesis that these compounds may have immune modulatory properties and may alter the response of the nematode toward C. albicans.
The immune system of C. elegans is different from the immune system of mammals. Therefore, it might be difficult to identified drugs which affect the immune system of the mammals. However, the innate immune response is evolutionary conserved in some extent between invertebrates and vertebrates. Moreover, with the use of C. elegans as a model host the host defense against pathogen can be studied. For example, studies using the C. elegans receptors CED-1 and C03f11.3 and the orthologues mammalian scavenger receptors SCARF1 and CD36 identified for their role in the immune response of the organisms against fungal pathogens[26].
Importantly, there is a need for toxicity testing of various compounds and drugs[27]. C. elegans is a promising model for estimating the toxicity of compounds[28]. C. elegans has been used as an indicator of toxicity from heavy metals, environmental pollutants, organic solvents, and neurotoxins[29]. Toxicity against nematodes has been quantified based on nematode survival, growth, reproduction, expression of stress response proteins, feeding behavior, and movement. The utility of C. elegans in toxicology testing greatly depends on how it correlates to toxicity in mammalian models. Williams and Dusenbery determined that toxicity of heavy metals against C. elegans as measured by the LC50 values (concentration resulting in 50% death) correlates well with toxicity against mice or rats in rank order tests[30]. Additionally, Cole et al. reported a significant correlation from rank order toxicity tests from organophosphates between C. elegans and rodents[31].
In antimicrobial discovery it is possible to estimate the toxicity of the compounds on C. elegans. For example, in the case of the C. albicans infection model, fluconazole up to 32 µg/ml was effective in prolonging survival of nematodes exposed to a fluconazole-susceptible Candida strain, but at higher concentrations (100 µg/ml) nematode survival was diminished, even compared to the nematodes in an untreated control group. Most likely, this toxicity is present at even lower concentrations, but the beneficial effect from the antifungal activity outweighs the toxic effect[21]. Another example is the malachite green carbinol base which is metabolized to the leucomalachite green form[24, 32]. It was observed that this compound does not inhibit the development of C. albicans in a small concentration of 0.95 mg/ml—the nematodes died from infection and hyphae protruded through the cuticle of nematodes. With concentrations greater than 0.95 mg/ml up to EC50 (7.62 mg/ml), the compound rescued the nematodes from infection with C. albicans and the survival of the nematode was increased. However, using concentrations of more than 7.62 mg/ml decreased nematode survival.
2.2 Antibacterial compounds identification using C. elegans
Many human pathogens can cause infection in C. elegans, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Salmonella enterica, Enterococcus faecalis, and Staphylococcus aureus. All of these human pathogens can be a food source for C. elegans. The pathogen and the mechanism of infection can be studied with the use of C. elegans as a model of infection[33, 34]. For example, C. elegans has been used as a model host in the creation of the C. elegans-E. faecalis infection assay. A high throughput screen of 6,000 synthetic compounds and 1,136 natural extracts for their activity as antimicrobial was applied. 16 synthetic compounds and 9 natural extracts were recognized for their activity in increasing nematode survival[35]. Some of the compounds demonstrated a greater effectiveness in vivo than in vitro which suggests that these compounds target bacterial virulence factors or change the host immune system. 15 of 16 synthetic compounds have no toxicity and only one compound has a growth retardation effect on the nematodes.
A new screen was done, with the improved method of co-inoculation. 33,931 compounds and 3,283 natural extracts were tested, and 28 compounds and extracts were identified for their antimicrobial activity[36]. 6 compounds increased the survival of C. elegans but did not inhibit the growth of E. faecalis in vitro. Therefore, the mechanism of action possibly is different from current antibiotics and they may act as immune system modulators or inhibitors of virulence factors.
2.3 Anthelmintic drugs discovery using C. elegans
Anthelmintic drug discovery with the use of C. elegans as a model host can be carried out. A great number of compounds have been tested so far but the use of the model for this purpose has diminished considerably. Recently, the activity of the KSI-4088 compound against the C. elegans was studied and the results show that the compound is an active anthelmintic drug[37].
2.4 Possible antimicrobial target identification with C. elegans
In addition to compound screening, C. elegans can be used to study microbial virulence and host-pathogen interactions[38–50]. Understanding the pathways and these mechanisms of infections will enable us to identify novel targets for antimicrobial agents. For example, the disaccharide trehalose plays an important role as an energy source and stress protectant in many organisms like bacteria and fungi[51, 52]. It has been found that the trehalose pathway is important for the survival of C. albicans in the host and it plays a significant role in infection[53]. C. neoformans tps1 (trehalose-6-phosphatase synthase 1) strain is the mutant strain of the trehalose-6-phosphate (T6P) synthase. In a C. elegans model of C. neoformans infection, the importance of the role of the trehalose pathway in the infectious process was confirmed, with the tps1 mutant showing attenuated virulence in C. elegans[54]. Therefore, the trehalose pathway could be a potential target for a new class of antifungal drugs in the C. elegans model (Table 2).
Table 2.
Targets for potential anti-microbial drugs identified using C. elegans
Another example is the phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C (PI-PLC). Phospholipase C 1 gene (PLC1) is the encoding gene of PI-PLC[55]. PLC is a principal modulator of virulence of C. neoformans that acts through the protein kinase C/MAPK (mitogen-activated protein kinase) pathway and controls the release of Phospholipase B1 from the plasma membrane[56–59]. Using the C. elegans model of C. neoformans infection, it has been established that PLC1 is essential for virulence of C. neoformans in vivo[55]. Hence the Plc1 is possibly a novel target for new antifungal drugs (Table 2).
The study of polymicrobian infections and in vivo pathogen-pathogen interactions also can be accomplished using C. elegans as host. These interactions are very important medically. The in vivo interaction between the prokaryote Acinetobacter baumannii and the eukaryote C. albicans using C. elegans as a model host was studied[60]. It was found that A. baumannii[61] competes with C. albicans and inhibits the ability of C. albicans to form hyphae and biofilm, the two important virulence factors of C. albicans. This was proved by the enhanced survival of nematodes when C. elegans was infected with these two pathogens compared to infection by C. elegans alone (Table 2). Therefore, understanding the mechanism of in vivo interaction between pathogens can uncover new targets for antimicrobial compounds[62, 63].
2.5 The use of C. elegans in drug discovery beyond antimicrobial agents
In addition to antifungal and antibacterial compounds, drug discovery with the use of C. elegans can be accomplished for a variety of medication classes including anesthetics, antidepressants, antineoplasmatic, and antihypertensive drugs[35, 64–69]. For example, the use of C. elegans could help to learn more about the mode of action of anesthetics and in the discovery of novel anesthetics[70]. Also, the cAMP-response element binding protein (CREB)-mediated pathway and the complete neuronal circuit which this pathway affects was studied using C. elegans[71] and this model could be used for the study of mental disorders and the discovery of new drugs[72].
In another study, 14100 compounds were screened for their ability to change phenotypes of the C. elegans[66]. 308 compounds were detected that can change nematode characteristics such as morphology, growth and egg laying. Nemadipine A was identified for its effect on the nematode morphology and egg laying. It was found that nemadipine A targets the egl-19 (EGg Laying defective) gene that encodes the L-type calcium channel α1-subunit in the C. elegans[73, 74]. It is similar to 1, 4-dihydropyridines class of hypertensive drugs that antagonize α1 subunit of L-type calcium channels. Also nemadipine A can act against the L-type calcium channel of vertebrates, hence it can act as a new calcium channel antagonist. As a result, with the help of C. elegans, a new active compound that could act as anti-hypertensive drug was identified.
The C. elegans can be used for antineoplasmatic drug discovery. Research has shown that the abl-1 gene of C. elegans antagonizes the germline apoptosis, after ionizing irradiation, that is mediated by p-53 and that the C. elegans might be used as a model for the development of new antineoplasmatic medications[75].
Expert opinion
In this review, we present the advantages of utilizing C. elegans in antimicrobial drug discovery. C. elegans has many advantages, including low cost, short life cycle, and well-studied genetics. Moreover, the nematodes can be used in high throughput screens and this model allows for the detection of new compounds with antimicrobial efficacy that can be later studied in detail. The initial testing of compounds in C. elegans before testing in mammals provides economic, time and ethical advantages.
One of the unique properties of C. elegans is its utility as a tool for drug discovery. Because the screen happens during a true infection process, the nematode system can help in detecting compounds which act by blocking virulence factors of pathogens and compounds that have an immune modulator effect on the host can be identified. Furthermore, it is possible to estimate the toxicity of compounds. This is very important because compounds that have a toxic effect on C. elegans could be toxic to mammalian cells. Despite large differences in anatomical and biochemical properties between mammals and invertebrates, it has been shown that there are enough similarities and correspondences to use C. elegans as a model host for research of a variety of diseases and medications. Many C. elegans mutant strains can mimic human diseases such Alzheimer's disease, Duchenne muscular dystrophy, diabetes, and cancer[76–80]. A very important factor in utilizing C. elegans in antimicrobial discovery is that there are similarities between microbial pathogenesis in mammals and C. elegans; therefore, compounds with antimicrobial property detected in C. elegans are highly likely to be compounds which can be used in humans. Searching for new compounds is facilitated by the utilization of the high-throughput technique for screening chemical libraries[36, 81]. This technique uniquely provides the tools for screening thousands of compounds[82–84]. Both in vitro and in vivo methods can be utilized in the high-throughput search. In vitro studies can provide information about the activity and the efficacy of the compounds against microbes. However, in vivo studies are desirable and more practical, because they add information about the host immune response and the toxicity of the compounds at the same time. As a result, this whole animal screen can identify new classes of drugs that up-regulate the immune system of the host.
The initial testing of compounds in C. elegans before testing in mammals provides economic, time and ethical advantages. The life cycle of the nematode is short and the time that is needed for infection and death of the nematode by a pathogen is less in comparison with a mouse model of infection. Moreover, high throughput screening with mammals, however, raises ethical issues.[85, 86]. These invertebrates include C. elegans, which has been studied and used intensively in the field of microbiology and high throughput screening. Differences between C. elegans and mammals pose some limitations. Verifying the antifungal properties of compounds using mammals remains necessary. Testing the compounds for their toxicity at mammalian level is required, and the study of drug pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics, like the distribution, the absorption and the protein binding of the compound, is important. C. elegans does not have all of the organs and genes of a mammal, but some features and functions are evolutionarily conserved[87–89]. Overall, these differences do not limit the use of C. elegans as a model host. Moreover, C. elegans has mechanisms of defense that have similarities with mammals. It has a four layered cuticle[90] that lines its exterior, rectal, and oral cavities[91]. In addition to the physical defense mechanisms, C. elegans has an enzymatic xenobiotic defense mechanism. For example, it has xenobiotic detoxification enzymes like cytochrome P450s and xenobiotic efflux pumps like ATP-binding cassette transporters. Therefore, many chemical compounds cannot accumulate easily in active concentrations within the nematode. Lately, a structural based accumulation model has been developed that can detect compounds[92] with a better accumulation within the nematode and increased bioavailability and bioactivity. Therefore, in the future it will be possible to choose compounds that have a better likelihood of reaching a target within the nematode.
There are efforts underway to improve the high throughput methods that utilize C. elegans in discovery of new antimicrobial agents, to become more effective and more accurate. These include a trial of a quantifiable automated scoring assay, a better nematode dispensing system, and an automated simultaneous C. elegans-C. albicans dispensing system. Moreover, the improvement of jointly dispensing C. albicans and C. elegans in each well in an automated way will save time and effort. Recently, a new automated detection system has been developed. It can recognize the developmental stage of the nematode from the size of the nematode. Also, a new imaging system can measure the fluorescence patterns. Therefore, it helps assessing the biological processes[93].
Drug discovery is a challenging research field. Research with the use of C. elegans has demonstrated great results and holds a promising future. The nematode is an excellent tool for the researcher and provides many valuable experimental elements. The many advantages of their use, including easy handling, the option for high throughput assays and the possibility of study of the interactions between the host and the pathogen have made the C. elegans a promising tool for preclinical drug discovery.
Acknowledgments
The authors work has been supported by NIH grants P01 AI 083214, R01 AI075286 and R21 AI079569. E Mylonakis has served on an Advisory Board and received research support from Astellas Pharma Inc.
Footnotes
Declaration of Interest
The authors declare no other conflict of interest.
Bibliography
- 1.Brenner S. The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1974;77:71–94. doi: 10.1093/genetics/77.1.71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Byerly L, Cassada RC, Russell RL. The life cycle of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. I. Wild-type growth and reproduction. Dev Biol. 1976;51:23–33. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(76)90119-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sulston JE, Brenner S. The DNA of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1974;77:95–104. doi: 10.1093/genetics/77.1.95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Genome sequence of the nematode C. elegans: a platform for investigating biology. Science. 1998;282:2012–2018. doi: 10.1126/science.282.5396.2012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Jorgensen EM, Mango SE. The art and design of genetic screens: caenorhabditis elegans. Nat Rev Genet. 2002;3:356–369. doi: 10.1038/nrg794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bieri T, Blasiar D, Ozersky P, Antoshechkin I, Bastiani C, Canaran P, et al. WormBase: new content and better access. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:D506–D510. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Chen N, Lawson D, Bradnam K, Harris TW, Stein LD. WormBase as an integrated platform for the C. elegans ORFeome. Genome Res. 2004;14:2155–2161. doi: 10.1101/gr.2521304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Harris TW, Antoshechkin I, Bieri T, Blasiar D, Chan J, Chen WJ, et al. WormBase: a comprehensive resource for nematode research. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38:D463–D467. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Rogers A, Antoshechkin I, Bieri T, Blasiar D, Bastiani C, Canaran P, et al. WormBase 2007. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36:D612–D617. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Schwarz EM, Antoshechkin I, Bastiani C, Bieri T, Blasiar D, Canaran P, et al. WormBase: better software, richer content. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34:D475–D478. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkj061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Edmond MB, Wallace SE, McClish DK, Pfaller MA, Jones RN, Wenzel RP. Nosocomial bloodstream infections in United States hospitals: a three-year analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 1999;29:239–244. doi: 10.1086/520192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Pfaller MA, Jones RN, Messer SA, Edmond MB, Wenzel RP. National surveillance of nosocomial blood stream infection due to Candida albicans: frequency of occurrence and antifungal susceptibility in the SCOPE Program. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1998;31:327–332. doi: 10.1016/s0732-8893(97)00240-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Miller LG, Hajjeh RA, Edwards JE., Jr Estimating the cost of nosocomial candidemia in the united states. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;32:1110. doi: 10.1086/319613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Rentz AM, Halpern MT, Bowden R. The impact of candidemia on length of hospital stay, outcome, and overall cost of illness. Clin Infect Dis. 1998;27:781–788. doi: 10.1086/514955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Walker LA, Gow NA, Munro CA. Fungal echinocandin resistance. Fungal Genet Biol. 2010;47:117–126. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2009.09.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Aperis G, Myriounis N, Spanakis EK, Mylonakis E. Developments in the treatment of candidiasis: more choices and new challenges. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2006;15:1319–1336. doi: 10.1517/13543784.15.11.1319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Loeffler J, Stevens DA. Antifungal drug resistance. Clin Infect Dis. 2003;36:S31–S41. doi: 10.1086/344658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Pfaller MA, Lockhart SR, Pujol C, Swails-Wenger JA, Messer SA, Edmond MB, et al. Hospital specificity, region specificity, and fluconazole resistance of Candida albicans bloodstream isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36:1518–1529. doi: 10.1128/jcm.36.6.1518-1529.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Antachopoulos C. Invasive fungal infections in congenital immunodeficiencies. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2010 doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03289.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Enwuru CA, Ogunledun A, Idika N, Enwuru NV, Ogbonna F, Aniedobe M, et al. Fluconazole resistant opportunistic oro-pharyngeal Candida and non-Candida yeast-like isolates from HIV infected patients attending ARV clinics in Lagos, Nigeria. Afr Health Sci. 2008;8:142–148. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Breger J, Fuchs BB, Aperis G, Moy TI, Ausubel FM, Mylonakis E. Antifungal chemical compounds identified using a C. elegans pathogenicity assay. PLoS Pathog. 2007;3:e18. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.0030018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lo HJ, Kohler JR, DiDomenico B, Loebenberg D, Cacciapuoti A, Fink GR. Nonfilamentous C. albicans mutants are avirulent. Cell. 1997;90:939–949. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80358-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Saville SP, Lazzell AL, Bryant AP, Fretzen A, Monreal A, Solberg EO, et al. Inhibition of filamentation can be used to treat disseminated candidiasis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006;50:3312–3316. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00628-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Okoli I, Coleman JJ, Tampakakis E, An WF, Holson E, Wagner F, et al. Identification of antifungal compounds active against Candida albicans using an improved high-throughput Caenorhabditis elegans assay. PLoS One. 2009;4:e7025. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Coleman JJ, Okoli I, Tegos GP, Holson EB, Wagner FF, Hamblin MR, et al. Characterization of plant-derived saponin natural products against Candida albicans. ACS Chem Biol. 2010;5:321–332. doi: 10.1021/cb900243b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Means TK, Mylonakis E, Tampakakis E, Colvin RA, Seung E, Puckett L, et al. Evolutionarily conserved recognition and innate immunity to fungal pathogens by the scavenger receptors SCARF1 and CD36. J Exp Med. 2009;206:637–653. doi: 10.1084/jem.20082109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Boyd WA, McBride SJ, Rice JR, Snyder DW, Freedman JH. A high-throughput method for assessing chemical toxicity using a Caenorhabditis elegans reproduction assay. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2010;245:153–159. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2010.02.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Boyd WA, Smith MV, Kissling GE, Freedman JH. Medium- and high-throughput screening of neurotoxicants using C. elegans. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2010;32:68–73. doi: 10.1016/j.ntt.2008.12.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Sochova I, Hofman J, Holoubek I. Using nematodes in soil ecotoxicology. Environ Int. 2006;32:374–383. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2005.08.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Williams PL, Dusenbery DB. Using the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans to predict mammalian acute lethality to metallic salts. Toxicol Ind Health. 1988;4:469–478. doi: 10.1177/074823378800400406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Cole RD, Anderson GL, Williams PL. The nematode Caenorhabditis elegans as a model of organophosphate-induced mammalian neurotoxicity. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2004;194:248–256. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2003.09.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Cho BP, Yang T, Blankenship LR, Moody JD, Churchwell M, Beland FA, et al. Synthesis and characterization of N-demethylated metabolites of malachite green and leucomalachite green. Chem Res Toxicol. 2003;16:285–294. doi: 10.1021/tx0256679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Powell JR, Ausubel FM. Models of Caenorhabditis elegans infection by bacterial and fungal pathogens. Methods Mol Biol. 2008;415:403–427. doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-570-1_24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Sifri CD, Begun J, Ausubel FM. The worm has turned--microbial virulence modeled in Caenorhabditis elegans. Trends Microbiol. 2005;13:119–127. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2005.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Moy TI, Ball AR, Anklesaria Z, Casadei G, Lewis K, Ausubel FM. Identification of novel antimicrobials using a live-animal infection model. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:10414–10419. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0604055103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Moy TI, Conery AL, Larkins-Ford J, Wu G, Mazitschek R, Casadei G, et al. High-throughput screen for novel antimicrobials using a whole animal infection model. ACS Chem Biol. 2009;4:527–533. doi: 10.1021/cb900084v. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kaewintajuk K, Cho PY, Kim SY, Lee ES, Lee HK, Choi EB, et al. Anthelmintic activity of KSI-4088 against Caenorhabditis elegans. Parasitol Res. 2010;107:27–30. doi: 10.1007/s00436-010-1828-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Aballay A, Ausubel FM. Caenorhabditis elegans as a host for the study of host-pathogen interactions. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2002;5:97–101. doi: 10.1016/s1369-5274(02)00293-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Fuchs BB, Mylonakis E. Using non-mammalian hosts to study fungal virulence and host defense. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2006;9:346–351. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2006.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Irazoqui JE, Ausubel FM. 99th Dahlem conference on infection, inflammation and chronic inflammatory disorders: Caenorhabditis elegans as a model to study tissues involved in host immunity and microbial pathogenesis. Clin Exp Immunol. 2010;160:48–57. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2010.04122.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Irazoqui JE, Ng A, Xavier RJ, Ausubel FM. Role for beta-catenin and HOX transcription factors in Caenorhabditis elegans and mammalian host epithelial-pathogen interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:17469–17474. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0809527105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Irazoqui JE, Urbach JM, Ausubel FM. Evolution of host innate defence: insights from Caenorhabditis elegans and primitive invertebrates. Nat Rev Immunol. 2010;10:47–58. doi: 10.1038/nri2689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Miyata S, Begun J, Troemel ER, Ausubel FM. DAF-16-dependent suppression of immunity during reproduction in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 2008;178:903–918. doi: 10.1534/genetics.107.083923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Mylonakis E, Aballay A. Worms and flies as genetically tractable animal models to study host-pathogen interactions. Infect Immun. 2005;73:3833–3841. doi: 10.1128/IAI.73.7.3833-3841.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Mylonakis E, Ausubel FM, Perfect JR, Heitman J, Calderwood SB. Killing of Caenorhabditis elegans by Cryptococcus neoformans as a model of yeast pathogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:15675–15680. doi: 10.1073/pnas.232568599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Mylonakis E, Ausubel FM, Tang RJ, Calderwood SB. The art of serendipity: killing of Caenorhabditis elegans by human pathogens as a model of bacterial and fungal pathogenesis. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2003;1:167–173. doi: 10.1586/14787210.1.1.167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Mylonakis E, Casadevall A, Ausubel FM. Exploiting amoeboid and non-vertebrate animal model systems to study the virulence of human pathogenic fungi. PLoS Pathog. 2007;3:e101. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.0030101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Mylonakis E, Idnurm A, Moreno R, El Khoury J, Rottman JB, Ausubel FM, et al. Cryptococcus neoformans Kin1 protein kinase homologue, identified through a Caenorhabditis elegans screen, promotes virulence in mammals. Mol Microbiol. 2004;54:407–419. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04310.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Pukkila-Worley R, Peleg AY, Tampakakis E, Mylonakis E. Candida albicans hyphal formation and virulence assessed using a Caenorhabditis elegans infection model. Eukaryot Cell. 2009;8:1750–1758. doi: 10.1128/EC.00163-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Tang RJ, Breger J, Idnurm A, Gerik KJ, Lodge JK, Heitman J, et al. Cryptococcus neoformans gene involved in mammalian pathogenesis identified by a Caenorhabditis elegans progeny-based approach. Infect Immun. 2005;73:8219–8225. doi: 10.1128/IAI.73.12.8219-8225.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Elbein AD. The metabolism of alpha,alpha-trehalose. Adv Carbohydr Chem Biochem. 1974;30:227–256. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2318(08)60266-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Wiemken A. Trehalose in yeast, stress protectant rather than reserve carbohydrate. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 1990;58:209–217. doi: 10.1007/BF00548935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Himmelreich U, Allen C, Dowd S, Malik R, Shehan BP, Mountford C, et al. Identification of metabolites of importance in the pathogenesis of pulmonary cryptococcoma using nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Microbes Infect. 2003;5:285–290. doi: 10.1016/s1286-4579(03)00028-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Petzold EW, Himmelreich U, Mylonakis E, Rude T, Toffaletti D, Cox GM, et al. Characterization and regulation of the trehalose synthesis pathway and its importance in the pathogenicity of Cryptococcus neoformans. Infect Immun. 2006;74:5877–5887. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00624-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Chayakulkeeree M, Sorrell TC, Siafakas AR, Wilson CF, Pantarat N, Gerik KJ, et al. Role and mechanism of phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C in survival and virulence of Cryptococcus neoformans. Mol Microbiol. 2008;69:809–826. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06310.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Cox GM, McDade HC, Chen SC, Tucker SC, Gottfredsson M, Wright LC, et al. Extracellular phospholipase activity is a virulence factor for Cryptococcus neoformans. Mol Microbiol. 2001;39:166–175. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02236.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Ganendren R, Carter E, Sorrell T, Widmer F, Wright L. Phospholipase B activity enhances adhesion of Cryptococcus neoformans to a human lung epithelial cell line. Microbes Infect. 2006;8:1006–1015. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2005.10.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Santangelo R, Zoellner H, Sorrell T, Wilson C, Donald C, Djordjevic J, et al. Role of extracellular phospholipases and mononuclear phagocytes in dissemination of cryptococcosis in a murine model. Infect Immun. 2004;72:2229–2239. doi: 10.1128/IAI.72.4.2229-2239.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Siafakas AR, Sorrell TC, Wright LC, Wilson C, Larsen M, Boadle R, et al. Cell wall-linked cryptococcal phospholipase B1 is a source of secreted enzyme and a determinant of cell wall integrity. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:37508–37514. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M707913200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Peleg AY, Tampakakis E, Fuchs BB, Eliopoulos GM, Moellering RC, Jr, Mylonakis E. Prokaryote-eukaryote interactions identified by using Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:14585–14590. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0805048105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Liu CH, Chen X, Liu TT, Lian B, Gu Y, Caer V, et al. Study of the antifungal activity of Acinetobacter baumannii LCH001 in vitro and identification of its antifungal components. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007;76:459–466. doi: 10.1007/s00253-007-1010-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Chim H, Tan BH, Song C. Five-year review of infections in a burn intensive care unit: High incidence of Acinetobacter baumannii in a tropical climate. Burns. 2007;33:1008–1014. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2007.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Peleg AY, Seifert H, Paterson DL. Acinetobacter baumannii: emergence of a successful pathogen. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2008;21:538–582. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00058-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Artal-Sanz M, de Jong L, Tavernarakis N. Caenorhabditis elegans: a versatile platform for drug discovery. Biotechnol J. 2006;1:1405–1418. doi: 10.1002/biot.200600176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Burns AR, Kwok TC, Howard A, Houston E, Johanson K, Chan A, et al. High-throughput screening of small molecules for bioactivity and target identification in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nat Protoc. 2006;1:1906–1914. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2006.283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Kwok TC, Ricker N, Fraser R, Chan AW, Burns A, Stanley EF, et al. A small-molecule screen in C. elegans yields a new calcium channel antagonist. Nature. 2006;441:91–95. doi: 10.1038/nature04657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Pukkila-Worley R, Holson E, Wagner F, Mylonakis E. Antifungal drug discovery through the study of invertebrate model hosts. Curr Med Chem. 2009;16:1588–1595. doi: 10.2174/092986709788186237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Segalat L. Drug discovery: here comes the worm. ACS Chem Biol. 2006;1:277–278. doi: 10.1021/cb600221m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Tampakakis E, Okoli I, Mylonakis E. A C. elegans-based, whole animal, in vivo screen for the identification of antifungal compounds. Nat Protoc. 2008;3:1925–1931. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2008.193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Steele LM, Sedensky MM, Morgan PG. Alternatives to mammalian pain models 1: use of C. elegans for the study of volatile anesthetics. Methods Mol Biol. 2010;617:1–17. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60327-323-7_1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Kimura Y, Corcoran EE, Eto K, Gengyo-Ando K, Muramatsu MA, Kobayashi R, et al. A CaMK cascade activates CRE-mediated transcription in neurons of Caenorhabditis elegans. EMBO Rep. 2002;3:962–966. doi: 10.1093/embo-reports/kvf191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Zubenko GS, Jones ML, Estevez AO, Hughes HB, 3rd, Estevez M. Identification of a CREB-dependent serotonergic pathway and neuronal circuit regulating foraging behavior in Caenorhabditis elegans: a useful model for mental disorders and their treatments? Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2009;150B:12–23. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.b.30891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Jospin M, Jacquemond V, Mariol MC, Segalat L, Allard B. The L-type voltage-dependent Ca2+ channel EGL-19 controls body wall muscle function in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Cell Biol. 2002;159:337–348. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200203055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Lee RY, Lobel L, Hengartner M, Horvitz HR, Avery L. Mutations in the alpha1 subunit of an L-type voltage-activated Ca2+ channel cause myotonia in Caenorhabditis elegans. Embo J. 1997;16:6066–6076. doi: 10.1093/emboj/16.20.6066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Deng X, Hofmann ER, Villanueva A, Hobert O, Capodieci P, Veach DR, et al. Caenorhabditis elegans ABL-1 antagonizes p53-mediated germline apoptosis after ionizing irradiation. Nat Genet. 2004;36:906–912. doi: 10.1038/ng1396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Carre-Pierrat M, Mariol MC, Chambonnier L, Laugraud A, Heskia F, Giacomotto J, et al. Blocking of striated muscle degeneration by serotonin in C. elegans. J Muscle Res Cell Motil. 2006;27:253–258. doi: 10.1007/s10974-006-9070-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Link CD. C. elegans models of age-associated neurodegenerative diseases: lessons from transgenic worm models of Alzheimer's disease. Exp Gerontol. 2006;41:1007–1013. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2006.06.059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Morcos M, Hutter H. The model Caenorhabditis elegans in diabetes mellitus and Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2009;16:897–908. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2009-0977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Schlotterer A, Kukudov G, Bozorgmehr F, Hutter H, Du X, Oikonomou D, et al. C. elegans as model for the study of high glucose- mediated life span reduction. Diabetes. 2009;58:2450–2456. doi: 10.2337/db09-0567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Smialowska A, Baumeister R. Presenilin function in Caenorhabditis elegans. Neurodegener Dis. 2006;3:227–232. doi: 10.1159/000095260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Kaletta T, Hengartner MO. Finding function in novel targets: C. elegans as a model organism. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2006;5:387–398. doi: 10.1038/nrd2031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Macarron R, Hertzberg RP. Design and Implementation of High Throughput Screening Assays. Mol Biotechnol. 2011 doi: 10.1007/s12033-010-9335-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Macarron R, Hertzberg RP. Design and implementation of high throughput screening assays. Methods Mol Biol. 2002;190:1–29. doi: 10.1385/1-59259-180-9:001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Macarron R, Hertzberg RP. Design and implementation of high-throughput screening assays. Methods Mol Biol. 2009;565:1–32. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60327-258-2_1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.O'Rourke EJ, Conery AL, Moy TI. Whole-animal high-throughput screens: the C. elegans model. Methods Mol Biol. 2009;486:57–75. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60327-545-3_5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Segalat L. Invertebrate animal models of diseases as screening tools in drug discovery. ACS Chem Biol. 2007;2:231–236. doi: 10.1021/cb700009m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Coleman JJ, Mylonakis E. The tangled web of signaling in innate immunity. Cell Host Microbe. 2009;5:313–315. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2009.04.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Ziegler K, Kurz CL, Cypowyj S, Couillault C, Pophillat M, Pujol N, et al. Antifungal innate immunity in C. elegans: PKCdelta links G protein signaling and a conserved p38 MAPK cascade. Cell Host Microbe. 2009;5:341–352. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2009.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Ren M, Feng H, Fu Y, Land M, Rubin CS. Protein kinase D is an essential regulator of C. elegans innate immunity. Immunity. 2009;30:521–532. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2009.03.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Cox GN, Kusch M, Edgar RS. Cuticle of Caenorhabditis elegans: its isolation and partial characterization. J Cell Biol. 1981;90:7–17. doi: 10.1083/jcb.90.1.7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Avery L, Shtonda BB. Food transport in the C. elegans pharynx. J Exp Biol. 2003;206:2441–2457. doi: 10.1242/jeb.00433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Burns AR, Wallace IM, Wildenhain J, Tyers M, Giaever G, Bader GD, et al. A predictive model for drug bioaccumulation and bioactivity in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nat Chem Biol. 2010;6:549–557. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Gosai SJ, Kwak JH, Luke CJ, Long OS, King DE, Kovatch KJ, et al. Automated high-content live animal drug screening using C. elegans expressing the aggregation prone serpin alpha1-antitrypsin Z. PLoS One. 2010;5:e15460. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]