Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Invest Dermatol. 2011 Mar 31;131(7):1579–1583. doi: 10.1038/jid.2011.65

Global Analysis of BRAFV600E Target Genes in Human Melanocytes Identifies Matrix Metalloproteinase-1 as a Critical Mediator of Melanoma Growth

Byungwoo Ryu 1,4, Whei F Moriarty 1,2, Megan J Stine 1,2, Amena DeLuca 1, Dave S Kim 1, Alan K Meeker 1,3, Landon D Grills 1, Rebecca A Switzer 1, Mark S Eller 5, Rhoda M Alani 1,2,5
PMCID: PMC3116059  NIHMSID: NIHMS280294  PMID: 21451543

TO THE EDITOR

BRAF kinase has been found to be mutationally activated in up to 70% of benign nevi and melanomas (Davies et al., 2002). It has been implicated as a critical mediator of melanoma development, with the V600E activating mutation representing the most commonly mutated form of BRAF in nevi and melanomas (Pollock et al., 2003). Despite strong evidence implicating BRAF kinase as a bona-fide oncogene in melanoma, its precise downstream targets in melanocytes have not been defined to date, and a BRAF-specific gene signature in melanomas remains uncertain (Hoek et al., 2006).

We have introduced activated BRAFV600E into human primary melanocytes (HPMs) in order to assess its specific functions (Figure 1a and also see the supplemental information for details of experimental methods). The gene expression signature of HPMs induced by acute expression of the BRAFV600E was assessed in comparison to HPMs expressing GFP (Figure 1c). The complete dataset is accessible as GSE13827a. We found that the BRAFV600E signature of HPMs was characterized by upregulation of several growth promoting genes and cellular motility and inflammation associated genes (Figure 1b) with a common network activation of cellular growth/proliferation and apoptosis (Figure S1). This finding suggests that BRAFV600E may induce gene signatures of biphasic cellular responses, proliferation as observed in melanomas and oncogene-induced growth arrest observed in nevi. Detection of genes involved in proliferation such as MMP1, AREG, CXCL5, IL-8, and EREG (Figure 1c and Table S1) implies that short-term cellular response by acute BRAFV600E expression may be HPM proliferation rather than growth arrest which appears to be a long-term sustained effect of BRAFV600E (Michaloglou et al., 2005; Woods et al., 1997). Therefore, we reasoned that the cellular proliferation signal induced by the BRAFV600E in HPM may be reactivated in melanoma for tumor growth. In order to test this hypothesis, we sought to further examine functional roles of MMP-1 as a BRAF effector in melanoma because MMP-1 is most strongly induced by BRAF (Table S1) and reported to be involved in melanoma progression and metastasis (Blackburn et al., 2007).

Figure 1. A proliferative gene signature induced by oncogenic BRAF in human primary melanocyte (HPM) and gene ontology (GO) annotation analysis.

Figure 1

(a) Activation of MAPK signal transduction pathway by acute expression of BRAFV600E in HPM. (b) A pie chart of the GO annotation analysis. Eighty two annotated genes from 137 probe sets which are identified as greater than 3-fold differentially expressed genes were analyzed. p-value <0.005 was used for identification of the biological processes that may be regulated by BRAF downstream effectors. Numbers shown in parenthesis indicate number of genes classified as the suggested categories. (c) Heat map presentation of the downstream effector gene signature induced by BRAFV600E. Top 15 up- and down-regulated genes were shown. GFP; HPM expressing GFP, BRAFV600E; HPM expressing mutant BRAFV600E.

In order to determine whether MMP-1 expression correlated with BRAFV600E expression in melanomas, melanoma cell lines and HPMs were examined for MMP-1 mRNA expression using gene expression profiling as previously described (Ryu et al., 2007). We identified 25-fold increased expression of MMP-1 mRNA in melanoma cells possessing BRAFV600E compared to wildtype while HPMs expressed similar transcript levels with BRAF wildtype melanoma cell (Figure 2a), suggesting that increased BRAF kinase activity may be associated with elevated MMP-1 expression in melanomas. We also found that melanocytes expressing BRAFV600E have increased levels of secreted MMP-1 protein (Figure 2b) and collagenase activity (Figure 2c) versus HPM controls, suggesting that activated BRAF can induce both MMP-1 protein expression and activity. In order to determine the functional significance of BRAF kinase induction of MMP-1 in human melanomas, we assessed the effect of MMP-1 gene silencing on the proliferative functions of BRAF kinase. MMP-1 mRNA and protein levels were efficiently reduced in melanomas possessing either wildtype BRAF (WM852) or mutant BRAFV600E (WM793) using targeted MMP-1 siRNA (Figure 2d and 2e). Cellular proliferation was assessed in both BRAF wildtype and mutant melanomas following MMP-1 silencing by siRNA (Figure 2f) and a neutralizing MMP-1 antibody (data not shown). Significant inhibition of proliferation was seen in both BRAF wildtype and mutant melanoma cells following MMP-1 knockdowns; however, while cell growth was inhibited by 17% with MMP-1 siRNA versus control siRNA in BRAF wildtype melanomas, growth inhibition by MMP-1 siRNA in the BRAF mutant melanoma cells was significantly more effective at 80% inhibition despite comparable gene silencing (Figure 2f). We therefore conclude that BRAFV600E may promote cellular growth in melanomas through activated expression of MMP-1. It should be noted that MMP-1 silencing by RNAi was previously shown to affect only metastasis but not tumor growth in a melanoma cell line (VMM12) (Blackburn et al., 2007). However, Blackburn et al. also reported that stable overexpression of MMP-1 in Bowers melanoma cells promotes xenograft tumor growth in a recent study (Blackburn et al., 2009). These data suggest variable effects of MMP-1 in melanoma cell lines likely attributable to the molecular heterogeneity of melanomas. It is likely that WM792 and Bowers melanoma cells depend on BRAF/MMP-1 mediated cellular pathways for tumor growth which may not be the case for VMM12 melanoma cells. As we were able to show that MMP-1 promotes growth in melanoma cells expressing BRAFV600E, we sought to clarify functional targets for MMP-1 in this setting. Since amphiregulin (AREG), a ligand for the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), was also found to be significantly induced by BRAFV600E in HPMs (Figure 1c and Table S1) and is synthesized as a precursor protein that is released from the plasma membrane by metalloproteinases (Lu et al., 2009; Zhang et al., 2004), we sought to evaluate whether HPMs expressing BRAFV600E expressed elevated levels of activated AREG. We found >100-fold expression of activated AREG in HPMs expressing BRAFV600E versus controls (Figure 2g). In order to determine whether induction of activated AREG in HPMs expressing BRAFV600E was due to cleavage by activated MMP-1, we evaluated the effect of silencing MMP-1 on expression of activated AREG in melanoma cells expressing BRAFV600E versus wildtype BRAF-expressing melanoma cells. We found that silencing of MMP-1 led to a significant reduction in levels of cleaved AREG in BRAFV600E melanoma cells, but no significant change in expression in the BRAF-wildtype melanoma cells (Figure 2h).

Figure 2. Activated BRAF promotes melanoma cell growth by MMP-1.

Figure 2

(a) Relative MMP-1 mRNA levels in HPMs and melanoma cells expressing wildtype (WM852), or mutant BRAF (WM793). (b) Relative levels of secreted MMP-1 in conditioned media obtained from HPMs expressing GFP or BRAFV600E at 72 hours following lentiviral infection. (c) Relative MMP-1 collagenase activity in conditioned media obtained from HPMs expressing GFP or BRAFV600E at 72 hours following lentiviral infection. (d) qRT-PCR analysis of MMP-1 expression following gene silencing by siRNA in melanomas possessing either wildtype (WM852) or mutant BRAFV600E (WM793). (e) Relative MMP-1 concentration in cell culture media following MMP-1 gene silencing in melanomas possessing wildtype (WM852) and BRAFV600E (WM793) cells. (f). 3H-thymidine cell proliferation assay of melanomas possessing wildtype (WM852) and BRAFV600E (WM793) following MMP-1 gene silencing. (g) Relative expression of activated AREG in conditioned media from HPMs expressing GFP or BRAFV600E. (h) Relative expression of activated AREG in melanomas expressing wildtype (WM852), or mutant BRAF (WM793) following MMP-1 gene silencing. Columns, mean of three individual experiments done in triplicate; bars, SD. *, P < 0.05, **, P < 0.01, ***, P < 0.001, compared with GFP control in the Figure 2b, c, g, and compared with siRNA control (Scramble) in the Figure 2d, e, f, h.

Although previous studies suggested that BRAF kinase activity promotes expression of MMP-1 in melanoma (Huntington et al., 2004) and that MMP-1 promotes melanoma progression (Blackburn et al., 2007), these authors conclude that induction of MMP-1 in melanoma is specifically important for melanoma progression and metastasis through degradation functions on interstitial collagens. Here we show that MMP-1 is a critical mediator of the growth promoting functions of BRAF kinase in melanoma cells which is consistent with a proliferative role for BRAFV600E in the development of melanomas. Indeed, recent studies have suggested an additional important role for MMPs in activating latent growth factors which may be critical to the effects of MMP-1 seen in our studies. Notably, MMP-1 has been implicated in activating breast cancer and melanoma cell growth through proteolytic activation of the cell surface receptor PAR1 (Blackburn et al., 2009; Boire et al., 2005). Together with the report that EGFR is highly expressed in vertical growth phase primary (89%) and metastatic melanoma (80%) (Rodeck et al., 1991), data presented in this study demonstrating the growth promoting function of MMP-1 in human melanomas, suggests that BRAFV600E induced activation of an autocrine feedback loop (MMP-1/AREG/EGFR/RAS/BRAF) may play a critical role in melanoma growth and metastasis. It is also possible that tumor cell-induced AREG expression and activation may affect the growth of neighboring endothelial and stromal cells. This may further promote tumor cell metastasis by modulating the tumor-specific microenvironment. Taken together, this feedback loop could be an important player for melanoma progression and a molecular target for melanoma therapy. Further studies are currently ongoing to test this hypothesis using EGFR inhibitors in our experimental model.

Supplementary Material

Acknowledgments

We thank B. Vogelstein, P. Cole, and members of the Alani Lab for critical review of this manuscript and helpful discussions. We thank M. Herlyn, X. Yu and G. Robertson for providing critical reagents. This work was supported by grants from the National Cancer Institute CA107017 (RA), CA113779 (BR), the Flight Attendant Medical Research Institute (RA), The American Skin Association (RA, AD), The Murren Family Foundation, and The Henry and Elaine Kaufman Foundation.

Abbreviations

HPM

Human Primary Melanocyte

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Blackburn JS, Liu I, Coon CI, Brinckerhoff CE. A matrix metalloproteinase-1/protease activated receptor-1 signaling axis promotes melanoma invasion and metastasis. Oncogene. 2009;28:4237–48. doi: 10.1038/onc.2009.272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Blackburn JS, Rhodes CH, Coon CI, Brinckerhoff CE. RNA interference inhibition of matrix metalloproteinase-1 prevents melanoma metastasis by reducing tumor collagenase activity and angiogenesis. Cancer research. 2007;67:10849–58. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-1791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Boire A, Covic L, Agarwal A, Jacques S, Sherifi S, Kuliopulos A. PAR1 is a matrix metalloprotease-1 receptor that promotes invasion and tumorigenesis of breast cancer cells. Cell. 2005;120:303–13. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.12.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Davies H, Bignell GR, Cox C, Stephens P, Edkins S, Clegg S, et al. Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer. Nature. 2002;417:949–54. doi: 10.1038/nature00766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hoek KS, Schlegel NC, Brafford P, Sucker A, Ugurel S, Kumar R, et al. Metastatic potential of melanomas defined by specific gene expression profiles with no BRAF signature. Pigment cell research / sponsored by the European Society for Pigment Cell Research and the International Pigment Cell Society. 2006;19:290–302. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0749.2006.00322.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Huntington JT, Shields JM, Der CJ, Wyatt CA, Benbow U, Slingluff CL, Jr, et al. Overexpression of collagenase 1 (MMP-1) is mediated by the ERK pathway in invasive melanoma cells: role of BRAF mutation and fibroblast growth factor signaling. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2004;279:33168–76. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M405102200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lu X, Wang Q, Hu G, Van Poznak C, Fleisher M, Reiss M, et al. ADAMTS1 and MMP1 proteolytically engage EGF-like ligands in an osteolytic signaling cascade for bone metastasis. Genes & development. 2009;23:1882–94. doi: 10.1101/gad.1824809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Michaloglou C, Vredeveld LC, Soengas MS, Denoyelle C, Kuilman T, van der Horst CM, et al. BRAFE600-associated senescence-like cell cycle arrest of human naevi. Nature. 2005;436:720–4. doi: 10.1038/nature03890. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Pollock PM, Harper UL, Hansen KS, Yudt LM, Stark M, Robbins CM, et al. High frequency of BRAF mutations in nevi. Nature genetics. 2003;33:19–20. doi: 10.1038/ng1054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Rodeck U, Melber K, Kath R, Menssen HD, Varello M, Atkinson B, et al. Constitutive expression of multiple growth factor genes by melanoma cells but not normal melanocytes. The Journal of investigative dermatology. 1991;97:20–6. doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12477822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ryu B, Kim DS, Deluca AM, Alani RM. Comprehensive expression profiling of tumor cell lines identifies molecular signatures of melanoma progression. PloS one. 2007;2:e594. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Woods D, Parry D, Cherwinski H, Bosch E, Lees E, McMahon M. Raf-induced proliferation or cell cycle arrest is determined by the level of Raf activity with arrest mediated by p21Cip1. Molecular and cellular biology. 1997;17:5598–611. doi: 10.1128/mcb.17.9.5598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Zhang Q, Thomas SM, Xi S, Smithgall TE, Siegfried JM, Kamens J, et al. SRC family kinases mediate epidermal growth factor receptor ligand cleavage, proliferation, and invasion of head and neck cancer cells. Cancer research. 2004;64:6166–73. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-0504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

RESOURCES