Skip to main content
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 2011 Jun 8;100(11):2773–2782. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.04.028

Location Trumps Length: Polyglutamine-Mediated Changes in Folding and Aggregation of a Host Protein

Matthew D Tobelmann 1, Regina M Murphy 1,
PMCID: PMC3117178  PMID: 21641323

Abstract

Expanded CAG diseases are progressive neurodegenerative disorders in which specific proteins have an unusually long polyglutamine stretch. Although these proteins share no other sequence or structural homologies, they all aggregate into intracellular inclusions that are believed to be pathological. We sought to determine what impact the position and number of glutamines have on the structure and aggregation of the host protein, apomyoglobin. Variable-length polyQ tracts were inserted either into the loop between the C- and D-helices (QnCD) or at the N-terminus (QnNT). The QnCD mutants lost some α-helix and gained unordered and/or β-sheet in a length-dependent manner. These mutants were partially unfolded and rapidly assembled into soluble chain-like oligomers. In sharp contrast, the QnNT mutants largely retained wild-type tertiary structure but associated into long, fibrillar aggregates. Control proteins with glycine-serine repeats (GS8CD and GS8NT) were produced. GS8CD exhibited similar structural perturbations and aggregation characteristics to an analogously sized Q16CD, indicating that the observed effects are independent of amino acid composition. In contrast to Q16NT, GS8NT did not form fibrillar aggregates. Thus, soluble oligomers are produced through structural perturbation and do not require polyQ, whereas classic fibrils arise from specific polyQ intermolecular interactions in the absence of misfolding.

Introduction

The expanded CAG repeat diseases consist of nine neurodegenerative disorders that are characterized by progressive loss of motor function and eventually cognitive decline, the most common of which is Huntington's disease (1). In affected individuals, a disease-specific protein is expressed with an abnormally long polyglutamine (polyQ) domain. The proteins share no other sequence or structural homology (2). Nuclear and/or cytoplasmic aggregates of the polyQ protein and/or its proteolytic fragments are invariably present in the disease state (3). These protein aggregates are hypothesized to cause neurodegeneration, although the mechanism for toxicity remains elusive. Two leading theories suggest that sequestration of transcription factors into aggregates (4,5) or overload of the ubiquitin-proteosomal system (6) may play a role.

The length of the expanded polyQ domain is inversely correlated with the age of onset of symptoms. The correlation is striking enough that it is common to describe a threshold length for disease, which varies from ∼20 to ∼60 glutamines depending on the specific disorder (1). Both the length of the polyQ domain (7–10) and its context within the protein (11–14) influence the propensity for aggregation. Some investigators have argued that destabilization of the native protein structure by expanded polyQ drives aggregation (15–17). Others have reported that increasing the polyQ length does not further destabilize the protein but still enhances aggregation (18), which would argue for the dominant role of polyQ-specific intermolecular association. Simulations suggest that the folding/unfolding transition broadens with polyQ length, increasing the lifetime of partially folded, aggregation-prone intermediates (19).

We set out to conduct a systematic study of the relative importance of the length of the polyQ domain, and the context into which the domain is placed, in terms of misfolding and aggregation. The ideal host protein for such biophysical studies is readily expressed, purified, and folded, and has well-characterized structural features. Unfortunately, in general, the proteins that are associated with expanded CAG diseases do not meet these criteria. With a few exceptions, little is known about their native structure or folding pathways, and many are difficult to express recombinantly as full-length proteins or without fusing to a solubilizing protein (2,3). We therefore chose to conduct our studies using a host protein that is not associated with disease. Precedence for this approach was established by previous studies that used glutathione S-transferase (20–22), thioredoxin (23,24), CRABP1 (8,17), Staphylococcal protein A (14), and Sup35 (25). This approach is also justified biologically by experiments wherein symptoms of classic polyQ neurodegenerative disease were induced by incorporation of expanded polyQ domains into an otherwise innocuous protein (26).

We chose to use apomyoglobin as our host protein for several reasons. First, apomyoglobin is readily expressed in Escherichia coli, and a wealth of information on its solution structure, stability, and folding pathway is available (27–30). Second, the native fold contains α-helices and a significant amount of disorder, reflecting the major secondary structural elements of the CAG-disease-related proteins (31–34). Third, we speculated that a marginally stable protein like apomyoglobin (28) would serve as a better model of amyloidogenic polyQ-containing proteins because the disease-related proteins are relatively unstable (15,35) and may populate multiple folds (36). Finally, others have used myoglobin as a model for amyloidogenic proteins (37–39) and as a host protein for polyQ (9,40,41).

We generated a small library of apomyoglobin mutants with variable polyQ length and position. Two positions were selected: the flexible surface loop between the short C and D helices (QnCD, where n = number of glutamines), and the N-terminus (QnNT). The mutants contained eight to 46 glutamines (Fig. 1). Unique to our work (to our knowledge), we created control mutants containing a glycine-serine repeat (GS8) in place of polyQ, to assist in decoupling contributions of structural perturbation to aggregation from specific polyQ-driven interactions. We then probed changes in secondary and tertiary structure, as well as the aggregation kinetics and aggregate morphology.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Myoglobin crystal structure and mutation sites (PDB ID 1MBN). In the apo form, the F-helix is unstructured. For QnCD, Qn was inserted between D45 and K48, deleting R46 and F47. For QnNT, Qn was inserted between M1 and V2.

Materials and Methods

Protein production and purification

We generated most of the QnCD mutants using a previously described procedure (42). For Q8CD, GS8CD, Q8NT, Q16NT, Q32NT, and GS8NT, recombinant proteins were expressed as described in the Supporting Material. Protein was recovered from the cell lysate supernatant and purified by nickel affinity chromatography. The proteins were refolded by rapid dilution, concentrated by ultrafiltration, and further purified by size exclusion chromatography (SEC; see Supporting Material). Unless otherwise specified, freshly concentrated protein samples in citrate buffer were immediately filtered with a 0.45 μM polyvinylidene fluoride filter, and the concentration was adjusted to ∼6–10 μM.

Circular dichroism

Freshly concentrated protein samples were prepared in 10 mM sodium phosphate, pH 6.8. Circular dichroism (CD) spectra were collected on an Aviv 202SF CD spectrometer at 20°C. The spectra were fit to a reference set (SP37), and secondary structure was calculated using the CONTINLL algorithm in CDPRO.

Fluorescence spectroscopy

Tryptophan fluorescence emission spectra were obtained with a QuantaMaster Series spectrofluorometer (PTI, Birmingham, NJ), with excitation at 295 nm. The center of spectral mass (λCSM) was calculated as described previously (44). A stock solution of 8-anilino-1-naphthalene sulfonic acid (ANS, 800 μM; AnaSpec, San Jose, CA) was diluted 10-fold with sample to yield an ANS/protein ratio of 8:1. Fluorescence spectra were obtained with excitation at 350 nm, and ANS λCSM was calculated using emission spectra from 410 to 500 nm. Unfolding in urea was followed by Trp fluorescence as described in the Supporting Material.

Monomer loss and sedimentation kinetics

Freshly prepared samples were injected onto a Superdex 75 PC 3.2/30 size exclusion column (GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ). Detection was made by absorbance at 280 nm and peak area was obtained by integration; the mean error was 4.5%. Samples were aliquoted into low-retention microcentrifuge tubes (Fisher, Pittsburgh, PA), sealed with paraffin film, and incubated at 37°C. At regular intervals, a sample tube was withdrawn and centrifuged at 19,500 rcf for 30 min. The supernatant (top 75%) was removed and subjected to SEC analysis. To determine the fraction of soluble protein, we determined the mass concentration in the supernatant in triplicate with a bicinchoninic acid (Pierce, Rockford IL) assay, using a BioTek (Winooski, VT) EL 800 Universal Microplate Reader.

Transmission electron microscopy

For transmission electron microscopy (TEM), samples were incubated at 37°C for ∼3 weeks. A drop was applied to a pioloform-coated grid, stained with methylamine tungstate stain, and then imaged with a Philips CM120 scanning transmission electron microscope (Philips, FEI, Hillsboro, OR).

Results and Discussion

Protein production, refolding, and purification

Qualitatively, the yield of protein was lower for the QnCD mutants than for the wild-type (WT), and yields decreased noticeably as the length of the polyQ domain increased. In contrast, yields of QnNT were at least as good as that of WT, and there was no drop-off in yield with polyQ length. WT spontaneously refolded to monomers after rapid dilution from denaturing buffer, but a small peak eluting at higher molecular weight was detected (Fig. S1), consistent with published results and attributed to nonnative aggregation during refolding (38). Similar peaks were detected for all QnCD mutants, with the fraction increasing significantly with increasing polyQ length. No high-molecular-weight peaks were observed for any QnNT mutants. Others have reported considerable difficulties in expressing folded and soluble polyQ-containing proteins (14,31,45). Our data illustrate that expression and refolding are strongly dependent on polyQ context. Positioning the domain in the CD loop significantly reduced both protein expression and efficient refolding in a length-dependent manner, whereas placing the domain N-terminally enhanced efficient refolding.

The monomer fraction was isolated and concentrated before further characterization. Most preparations remained fully monomeric after concentration, although for a few QnCD mutants we observed small oligomer peaks even after SEC purification. Most preparations were at least ∼95% pure by sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (not shown). For the longest QnCD mutants, we observed some protein contaminants after SEC purification and concentration, identified by mass spectrometry as E. coli ribosomal proteins. The purity of these contaminated samples is estimated at ∼85%. The residual heme content was assayed as 2% in WT and ∼0.5% in all of the QnCD mutants. The heme content of QnNT was a weak function of length, with 0.7% in Q8NT, 1% in Q16NT, and 2.5% in Q32NT.

Tanaka et al. (9,40,41) created myoglobin mutants with polyQ sequences of various lengths inserted into the CD loop. Their system differs from our QnCD mutants in several ways: 1), their insert included 16 residues from ataxin-3; 2), they did not specifically report removal of oligomers that could have formed during purification (9); and 3), their proteins contained variable amounts of heme (9,41). We took care to ensure that little to no heme remained, because holomyoglobin is more stable and considerably more resistant to aggregation than is apomyoglobin (46), and any variability in heme content would have complicated interpretation of our results.

Effects of polyQ location and length on secondary structure

CD spectra were collected for WT and all mutants (Fig. S2). The WT spectra exhibited minima at 209 nm and 222 nm, indicative of a predominantly α-helical protein. There was slight deepening of these minima with QnNT. In contrast, with QnCD, there was a length-dependent flattening of these minima as well as a decrease in the maximum at 194 nm. We estimated the distribution of secondary structural elements by quantitative analysis of CD spectra. The fitted values for WT agreed well with solution structures obtained from NMR (28,29). We calculated the number of residues in each secondary structure element by multiplying the fraction of that element by the total number of residues in that mutant, and then calculated the change in the number of residues adopting each secondary structure relative to WT (Fig. 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Change in the number of residues in secondary structural elements, relative to WT. The fraction of each secondary structure element was determined as described, and then multiplied by the total number of residues in each protein to calculate the number of residues of that element in the protein. This number was compared with the calculated average number of WT residues (n = 5) in that secondary structural element. Error bars represent the maximum and minimum of two independent measurements, with the exception of Q16CD (95% confidence interval) and Q34CD (three independent measurements).

With QnNT, there was a modest increase in the calculated number of helical residues compared with WT, but little change in β-sheet or disorder. These data suggest that the added glutamine residues may adopt a partially α-helical conformation when placed at the N-terminus. Alternatively, it is possible that the addition of polyQ at the N-terminus increases the helical content of the protein core, but this seems less likely.

Significantly different effects were obtained with QnCD, and these effects were length-dependent. For Q8CD, there was no change in α-helix or β-sheet, and the increase in the number of disordered residues was the same as the increase in the total number of residues. The simplest interpretation is that the native secondary structure of apomyoglobin is not disturbed and the Q8 sequence is disordered. With intermediate-length mutants (n = 16–28), there was a loss of α-helix, a slight increase in β-sheet, and a larger increase in disordered residues. We hypothesize that insertion of Q16 to Q28 in the CD loop results in unwinding of the short adjacent helices (four and five residues, respectively). As the polyQ length increased further (n = 34–46), the loss of helical residues remained about the same, but there was a larger increase in the number of β-sheet residues. A reasonable interpretation of these data is that the polyQ insert along with the flanking residues adopts some β-sheet character as the insert becomes longer. These experiments do not allow us to determine whether the additional β-sheet content is restricted to the erstwhile helices of the host protein or to the inserted polyQ sequence. Overall, there was not a sharp demarcation but rather a gradual transition in secondary structure between shorter and longer polyQ domains.

Our results can be usefully compared with literature reports. Bevivino and Loll (15) reported a loss in α-helix and increase in random coil with an increase in Q length in ataxin-3. PolyQ fused to glutathione-S-transferase was flexible and disordered independent of length (20,22). Similarly, polyQ fused to the C-terminus of Staphylococcal aureus protein A (SpA) B domain was disordered independent of length, and there was no effect on the conformation of the host protein (14). Nagai et al. (23) fused polyQ to the C-terminus of thioredoxin, a β-sheet protein, and observed increased helical content in a Q-length-dependent manner. In the huntingtin exon 1 fragment, Q17 adopted a heterogeneous mix of conformations, including α-helix, extended loop, and disordered (47). Modest increases in helical content due to polyQ have been reported for an androgen receptor fragment (48) and myoglobin mutants (41). These results illustrate that polyQ conformation is strongly context-dependent, and polyQ is almost universally either disordered or α-helical.

Effects of polyQ location and length on tertiary fold and stability

Apomyoglobin contains two tryptophans, W7 and W14, both of which are within the N-terminal helix. W14 contributes most to the fluorescence emission intensity because W7 fluorescence is quenched in the natively folded protein. W7 is partially solvent-exposed, and W14 is in a predominantly hydrophobic environment (49).

For all QnNT mutants, Trp λCSM was blue-shifted slightly relative to WT (Fig. 3 A), suggesting partial burial of W7 into a more hydrophobic environment. In contrast, for QnCD, λCSM was red-shifted, indicative of increased exposure to a polar environment and partial loss of native tertiary structure (41). For both QnCD and QnNT, emission intensity was Q-length-dependent (Fig. 3 B). Emission intensity was greatest for the mutants with the shortest polyQ length, and then decreased as the Q length increased. The emission intensity of Q46CD was well below that of WT. One possible explanation for the length-dependent loss of Trp emission intensity is increased quenching with glutamine (50), as this loop becomes long enough to interact with the N-terminal helix.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Trp fluorescence spectroscopy. All data points are the average of two experiments, with the exception of Q20CD, Q24CD, Q34CD, and Q38CD, for which three independent experiments were performed. Error bars represent the maximum and minimum values measured. (A) Center-of-spectral-mass wavelength, calculated using emissions from 320 to 360 nm. (B) Fluorescence emission intensity at maximum wavelength.

To further assist in interpreting these data, we partially unfolded WT in urea. At 2.5 M urea (20% unfolded), WT exhibited a red shift and an increase in Trp emission intensity (not shown) that was very similar to that observed for Q8CD, Q16CD, and Q20CD in the absence of urea. This suggests that the polyQ domain inserted into the CD loop causes partial (∼20%) unfolding of apomyoglobin. If WT is unfolded further by increasing the urea concentration, Trp λCSM and intensity both increase further (not shown). This is not what we observed with increasing Q length, suggesting that although the polyQ insert triggers partial loss of tertiary structure, lengthening the polyQ domain does not push the protein toward more unfolding.

Unfolding of the mutants during urea denaturation was studied by monitoring Trp fluorescence. QnNT mutants were slightly more resistant to unfolding than WT as measured by the increased concentration of urea (+0.4M) required for 50% unfolding (Cm). In contrast, QnCD mutants were less resistant to unfolding than WT (Cm decreased by 0.6 M). There was little or no polyQ length-dependent effect on Cm (Fig. S3). The unfolding curve was broader for QnCD than for WT or QnNT mutants (Fig. S4). This is suggestive of less sharply defined transitions for QnCD along the unfolding pathway and the presence of a conformational ensemble rather than a single native fold, consistent with simulations (19).

ANS binds strongly to the hydrophobic heme pocket of apomyoglobin (51), and its fluorescence can be used to confirm the existence of the pocket, which forms only upon attainment of the correct tertiary fold. ANS also detects hydrophobic patches that are exposed when a protein partially unfolds. ANS emission maximum at 455 nm and strong fluorescence intensity confirmed formation of the heme pocket for WT (not shown). All of the QnNT mutants retained the ANS spectra of WT, indicating that addition of polyQ to the N-terminus did not interfere with formation of the pocket (Fig. 4). In contrast, the ANS fluorescence wavelength was markedly red-shifted for all QnCD independently of Q length (Fig. 4 A), and the emission intensity was measurably decreased in a weakly length-dependent manner (Fig. 4 B). This result demonstrates loss of the heme pocket in QnCD. The decrease in ANS fluorescence with increasing Q length suggests that the hydrophobic patches exposed by partial unfolding are lost, either because of further unfolding or because these patches are covered by the long polyQ segment, as suggested by simulations (52). The changes in ANS fluorescence upon introduction of residues to the CD loop are very similar to those seen in WT upon partial unfolding with 2.5 M urea (not shown). We conclude that QnCD suffers partial loss of tertiary structure relative to WT, whereas native tertiary structure is retained in QnNT.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

ANS fluorescence spectroscopy. All data points represent the average of two experiments, with the exception of Q34CD, for which three independent measurements were collected. Error bars represent the maximum and minimum values measured. (A) Center-of-spectral-mass wavelength, calculated using emission spectra from 410 to 500 nm. (B) Fluorescence emission intensity at maximum wavelength.

Several other groups observed changes in tertiary structure or stability with polyQ proteins in previous studies, and most reported a decrease in stability. Robertson et al. (14) observed a large decrease in stability, in a Q-length-independent manner, when the polyQ domain was placed in a loop between two helices in the SpA B domain. However, they were unable to produce proteins with an interior sequence longer than 25 glutamines, and thus (in contrast to our study) did not probe the aggregation properties of these proteins. A partial loss of tertiary structure and/or a decrease in chemical or thermal stability with polyQ-containing proteins was also observed in studies involving CRABP I-httexon1 fusion proteins (8) and ataxin-3 (15,18). Several studies reported no effect of polyQ on stability (14,22). We are aware of only one study in which polyQ increased stability (measured as an increase in the temperature required to induce aggregation), with C-terminal attachment to glutathione S-transferase (21). We conclude that polyQ is more readily accommodated by a host protein if it is placed on the terminus rather than in a spatially restricted area, such as an interior loop.

Non-polyQ-specific changes in secondary and tertiary structure

To test whether any sequence inserted into the CD loop would cause a structural perturbation, we produced a mutant containing a GlySer octet repeat, GS8CD. We chose to use glycine and serine because they are flexible, hydrophilic residues that are frequently found in disordered loops at protein surfaces (53). We analyzed CD spectra, Trp and ANS fluorescence spectra, and urea denaturation curves for GS8CD and compared the data with those obtained from the two mutants with inserts of identical length, Q16CD and Q16NT (Table 1). Changes in secondary and tertiary fold for GS8CD and Q16CD relative to WT were very similar, and quite distinct from the (smaller) changes with Q16NT. These data demonstrate that the partial loss of structure observed in the QnCD mutants does not specifically require polyQ.

Table 1.

Secondary and tertiary structure changes with 16-mer insert, relative to WT

Change in number of residues
Change in λCSM (nm)
Change in [Urea] (M)
α-helix β-sheet coil/turn Trp ANS at 50% unfolding
Q16-NT +7 +4 +6 −0.25 +0.8 +0.5
Q16-CD −13 +10 +18 +0.49 +6.2 −0.6
GS8-CD −8 +7 +15 +0.34 +5.6 −0.4

Monomer loss and sedimentation

The WT, three QnCD mutants (n = 8, 16, or 38), three QnNT mutants (n = 8, 16, or 32), and controls GS8CD and GS8NT were selected for aggregation studies. Samples were monitored for monomer loss and soluble oligomer formation by SEC, and for formation of insoluble aggregates by sedimentation.

Representative chromatograms are shown in Fig. 5. No monomer loss was observed for WT over the 4-week test period (Fig. 5 A). In contrast, for QnCD, rapid monomer loss was indicated by a decrease in the monomer peak, which coincided with the appearance of an oligomeric peak eluting at the void volume (70 kDa). For Q16CD (Fig. 5 B), the monomer peak gradually disappeared while the oligomer peak gradually increased, whereas for Q8CD (Fig. 5 D), the monomer peak disappeared and the oligomer peak appeared within 24 h, followed by a slow loss of oligomer. For all QnCD mutants, the monomer loss kinetics was biphasic, with a rapid initial loss followed by a slower decline (Fig. 6 A). Surprisingly, monomer loss did not monotonically increase with Q length. The greatest monomer loss was observed for the shortest mutant, Q8CD.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Size-exclusion chromatograms as a function of time. Curves from bottom to top represent chromatographs for injections at 0, 2, 7, 14, 21, and 28 days. (A) WT. (B) Q16CD; no data at 28 days. (C) Q8NT chromatographs (inset: magnification of the soluble oligomer peak); no data at zero days. (D) Q8CD; no data at 21 days.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Aggregation kinetics. Samples were simultaneously analyzed for monomer loss and sedimentation: Q8CD (▪), Q16CD (▴),Q38CD (●), Q8NT (□), Q16NT (▵), Q32NT (○), GS8CD (×), and GS8NT (+). Solid lines: Qn-CD and Qn-NT; dashed lines: GS8 controls. (A) Monomer loss as a fraction of the initial monomer peak area. Initial monomer peak areas are an average of peak areas calculated from three injections. Peak areas for days 1–5 were calculated from single injections. Peak areas for days 7, 14, 21, and 28 are averages of two injections. Error bars from multiple injections were insignificant (<1.5%) and are not shown. (B) Sedimentation kinetics data. All data points are averages of three measurements. Error bars were small and are not shown for clarity.

The loss of soluble protein, as measured by sedimentation, lagged considerably behind the loss of monomer as detected by SEC (Fig. 6 B). Consistent with the monomer-loss data, the greatest sedimentation was observed with Q8CD. After 4 weeks, only 40% of Q8CD remained soluble, compared with 80% of Q38CD and 90% or more for all other mutants. The difference between the monomer-loss and sedimentation kinetics can be attributed to the formation of soluble aggregates.

Partially unfolded WT apomyoglobin is prone to aggregation (38); therefore, we propose that aggregation of QnCD is directly linked to partial loss of native fold. With Q8CD there was no loss of native secondary structure, but there was partial loss of tertiary structure and surprisingly aggressive aggregation. We hypothesize that in Q8CD, rapid aggregation is driven by exposure of hydrophobic patches due to partial loss of tertiary fold. With Q16CD there was a net loss of native helix, and rapid initial association into oligomers, but little sedimentation. The lower sedimentation with Q16CD compared with Q8CD could be due to the loss of helix. It is possible that the unwinding of the C- and D-helices provides sufficient additional entropy to maintain the oligomers in a soluble state. These data are usefully compared with literature reports of greater unfolding and decreased aggregation of apomyoglobin with increasing temperature (37,54). Thus, inserting Q8 or Q16 into the CD loop appears to be functionally equivalent to increasing the temperature. As the Q length increased further to 38, the loss of native helix was accompanied by increased nonnative refolding to β-sheet. We hypothesize that this refolding may explain why sedimentation is detected with Q38CD but not with Q16CD. The monomer-loss and sedimentation kinetics for the control mutant, GS8CD, was very similar to that of its Q16 cousin (Fig. 6). This result demonstrates that partial unfolding and aggregation in the CD mutants is driven by the structural perturbation brought about by the insertion, and does not require specific intermolecular polyQ association.

For QnNT, the monomer peak area was largely constant over time (Fig. 5 C). However, close examination revealed the existence of a very small oligomer peak at the void that appeared only after several days (Fig. 5 C, inset). In contrast to the rapid initial loss of monomer with the QnCD mutants, there was an apparent lag period before the onset of modest monomer loss for QnNT (Fig. 6 A). Despite the retention of secondary and tertiary structure, the QnNT mutants experienced some monomer loss, whereas the WT did not. Very little sedimentation was measured (Fig. 6 B).

Aggregate morphology

No aggregates were observed in TEM images of freshly prepared WT or mutants, or for aged WT, across several fields of view (not shown). With QnCD aged for 3 weeks at 37°C, we observed numerous small, flexible, chainlike aggregates, 100–200 nm in length, as well as some annular aggregates (Fig. 7, A, B, and D). These QnCD aggregates have a fuzzy, beads-on-a-string appearance, and such aggregates are frequently termed protofibrils. Of interest, these aggregates are morphologically very similar in length, diameter, and flexibility to those obtained by thermal denaturation of apomyoglobin (54). For Q8CD and Q38CD, oligomers eventually coalesced to form larger, amorphous aggregates (not shown), which likely accounts for the material lost by sedimentation (Fig. 6 B). Aggregates of GS8CD closely resembled those of the QnCD proteins (Fig. 7 C). This follows the pattern of all other assays in which the GS8CD control exhibited properties very similar to those of Q16CD.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

TEM images taken after incubation at 37°C for ∼3 weeks, except for GS8NT, which was incubated for ∼2 months. All images are representative of several fields of view. Reference bars are 200 nm. (A) Q8CD. (B) Q16CD. (C) GS8CD. (D) Q38CD. (E) Q8NT. (F) Q16NT. (G) Q32NT (inset: Q32NT filamentous network). (H) GS8NT.

With aged QnNT, we observed aggregates of starkly different morphology. With Q8NT and Q16NT, we saw highly ordered rigid fibrils, several microns in length and ∼25 nm in width, that appeared to be bundles of aligned filaments with a twisted morphology (Fig. 7, E and F). The fibrils were sparse, and we had to examine many fields of view to detect them. Q32NT aggregates were much more abundant than Q8NT and Q16NT aggregates, and tended to be somewhat shorter (Fig. 7 G). These aggregates were frequently assembled into a filamentous network (Fig. 7 G, inset) very similar in appearance to that formed from TBP-Q38 (55). Together with the observation that no oligomers were apparent in QnNT until after a lag period of several days (Figs. 5 C and 6 C), these results suggest that QnNT, unlike QnCD, self-associates via a classic nucleation-elongation pathway. We hypothesize that the ratio of nucleation/elongation rate constants increases with increasing polyQ length: slow (rare) nucleation leads to fewer, longer aggregates (as in Q8NT or Q16NT), whereas faster (more frequent) nucleation results in more, shorter aggregates (as in Q32NT). We speculate that the lower number density of Q8NT and Q16NT facilitates diffusion and alignment of filaments into fibrillar bundles in an orderly fashion, whereas the more numerous Q32NT filaments become kinetically trapped in a loose network because of crowding. We also examined the morphology of aged GS8NT. Strikingly absent from these TEM images is the presence of any fibrils. However, some short, semiflexible aggregates, similar in size and shape to those of the GS8CD and QnCD aggregates, can be observed (Fig. 7 H).

We hypothesize that the morphological differences between QnCD and QnNT aggregates arise from differences in the driving force for aggregation. Specifically, protofibrils arise from rapid association of partially misfolded protein via exposed hydrophobic patches. Because we saw virtually identical structural perturbations, aggregation kinetics, and aggregate morphology with Q16CD and GS8CD, we conclude that oligomerization is independent of the amino acid composition of the insert. In contrast, QnNT fibrils arise not from partial unfolding or misfolding but from specific polyQ-mediated intermolecular interactions. This conclusion is supported by the observation that the QnNT mutants were at least as stable as the WT, which does not aggregate, and GS8NT did not form fibrils.

Our data suggest that nonspecific partial loss of native structure leads to protofibrils, whereas polyQ-mediated association produces classic fibrils. There is some support in the literature for this notion. Some groups have reported that ataxin-3 with expanded polyQ is destabilized and quickly aggregates into chains similar in appearance and dimensions to those we observed for QnCD (15,56,57). Other researchers observed no destabilization of ataxin-3 with polyQ expansion, and aggregation into long fibrils of 20–45 nm diameter, similar in appearance to our QnNT fibrils (18). Ignatova and Gierasch (8) and Ignatova et al. (17) observed a shift in the aggregate morphology of a CRABP I-httexon1 chimera over time from spherical to curvilinear to fibrillar. They suggested that aggregation is initially driven by the aggregation-prone CRABP I domain but then later is dominated by the polyQ domain. This conclusion is similar to those reached by Bulone et al. (21) in their study of GST-polyQ fusion proteins, and by Ellisdon et al. (16,57). Both chain-like oligomers and ordered fibrils have been observed with huntingtin exon 1 fragments (58–60), with the more tightly packed, fibrillar aggregates dominating as the length of the polyQ domain increased (59,60).

Conclusions

We conducted a systematic investigation of folding and aggregation in polyQ-containing proteins. We produced a library of proteins with polyQ lengths ranging from sub- to suprapathological, and with inserts at two positions: the N-terminus and an interior loop. Of importance, we included two control mutants so that we could differentiate between the generic effects of insertion and specific polyQ effects. To our knowledge, no other studies of polyQ-mediated protein misfolding and aggregation have included these kinds of controls.

The location of the polyQ domain had a dominant influence on the nature of the effect of the insert on protein folding and aggregation, whereas the length of the domain modulated the extent of these effects. One of our most striking findings is the difference in morphology between aggregates made from QnCD versus QnNT. Our data suggest that, when placed in an interior loop, polyQ destabilizes native structure and accelerates aggregation primarily through partially folded intermediates and not through specific polyQ-polyQ association. In contrast, polyQ placed at the N-terminal site does not disturb the native structure but drives assembly into ordered fibrils through specific polyQ-mediated association.

We propose that there are two modes of aggregation of polyQ-containing proteins. One mode, epitomized by the QnCD mutants, is driven by hydrophobic interaction caused by destabilization and partial loss of native fold, leading to protofibrils and other oligomers. The initial aggregation kinetics is rapid, and, of importance, aggregation does not specifically require glutamines. In the other mode, epitomized by the QnNT mutants, association into filaments and fibrils follows classic nucleation-elongation kinetics and requires specific polyQ intermolecular interactions. We speculate that the second mode is operable only when polyQ is in a less-restricted location, e.g., at the terminus or in a highly flexible segment. In this light, it is interesting to note the strong bias toward placement of repeat amino acid motifs in disease-related proteins near the N- or C-terminus (61,62) and/or in highly disordered segments (34). There is growing evidence that aggregate morphology directs toxicity, although the specific morphology required for toxicity remains a matter of debate (23,59,63). Thanks to their distinct and controllable conformational and aggregation properties, the mutants we created may prove to be useful tools for teasing out the morphology-toxicity linkage.

Acknowledgments

We thank Gary Roberts, Robert Kerby, Darrell McCaslin, and Randall Massey for advice and assistance.

This work was supported by grants from the National Science Foundation (CBET-0852278) and the National Institutes of Health (5T32 GM-08349 to M.D.T.).

Supporting Material

Document S1. Materials and methods and four figures
mmc1.pdf (105.3KB, pdf)

References

  • 1.Gatchel J.R., Zoghbi H.Y. Diseases of unstable repeat expansion: mechanisms and common principles. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2005;6:743–755. doi: 10.1038/nrg1691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Saunders H.M., Bottomley S.P. Multi-domain misfolding: understanding the aggregation pathway of polyglutamine proteins. Protein Eng. Des. Sel. 2009;22:447–451. doi: 10.1093/protein/gzp033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wanker E.E. Protein aggregation and pathogenesis of Huntington's disease: mechanisms and correlations. Biol. Chem. 2000;381:937–942. doi: 10.1515/BC.2000.114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Okazawa H. Polyglutamine diseases: a transcription disorder? Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2003;60:1427–1439. doi: 10.1007/s00018-003-3013-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Truant R., Atwal R.S., Burtnik A. Nucleocytoplasmic trafficking and transcription effects of huntingtin in Huntington's disease. Prog. Neurobiol. 2007;83:211–227. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2006.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sherman M.Y., Goldberg A.L. Cellular defenses against unfolded proteins: a cell biologist thinks about neurodegenerative diseases. Neuron. 2001;29:15–32. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00177-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Scherzinger E., Lurz R., Wanker E.E. Huntingtin-encoded polyglutamine expansions form amyloid-like protein aggregates in vitro and in vivo. Cell. 1997;90:549–558. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80514-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ignatova Z., Gierasch L.M. Extended polyglutamine tracts cause aggregation and structural perturbation of an adjacent β barrel protein. J. Biol. Chem. 2006;281:12959–12967. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M511523200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Tanaka M., Machida Y., Nukina N. Expansion of polyglutamine induces the formation of quasi-aggregate in the early stage of protein fibrillization. J. Biol. Chem. 2003;278:34717–34724. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M209852200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Chen S.M., Ferrone F.A., Wetzel R. Huntington's disease age-of-onset linked to polyglutamine aggregation nucleation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2002;99:11884–11889. doi: 10.1073/pnas.182276099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Thakur A.K., Jayaraman M., Wetzel R. Polyglutamine disruption of the huntingtin exon 1 N terminus triggers a complex aggregation mechanism. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2009;16:380–389. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Nozaki K., Onodera O., Tsuji S. Amino acid sequences flanking polyglutamine stretches influence their potential for aggregate formation. Neuroreport. 2001;12:3357–3364. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200110290-00042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Darnell G., Orgel J.P., Meredith S.C. Flanking polyproline sequences inhibit β-sheet structure in polyglutamine segments by inducing PPII-like helix structure. J. Mol. Biol. 2007;374:688–704. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.09.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Robertson A.L., Horne J., Bottomley S.P. The structural impact of a polyglutamine tract is location-dependent. Biophys. J. 2008;95:5922–5930. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.108.138487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bevivino A.E., Loll P.J. An expanded glutamine repeat destabilizes native ataxin-3 structure and mediates formation of parallel β-fibrils. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2001;98:11955–11960. doi: 10.1073/pnas.211305198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ellisdon A.M., Pearce M.C., Bottomley S.P. Mechanisms of ataxin-3 misfolding and fibril formation: kinetic analysis of a disease-associated polyglutamine protein. J. Mol. Biol. 2007;368:595–605. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.02.058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ignatova Z., Thakur A.K., Gierasch L.M. In-cell aggregation of a polyglutamine-containing chimera is a multistep process initiated by the flanking sequence. J. Biol. Chem. 2007;282:36736–36743. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M703682200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Chow M.K.M., Ellisdon A.M., Bottomley S.P. Polyglutamine expansion in ataxin-3 does not affect protein stability: implications for misfolding and disease. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:47643–47651. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M405799200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Barton S., Jacak R., Dokholyan N.V. The length dependence of the polyQ-mediated protein aggregation. J. Biol. Chem. 2007;282:25487–25492. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M701600200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Klein F.A.C., Pastore A., Trottier Y. Pathogenic and non-pathogenic polyglutamine tracts have similar structural properties: towards a length-dependent toxicity gradient. J. Mol. Biol. 2007;371:235–244. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.05.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bulone D., Masino L., Pastore A. The interplay between PolyQ and protein context delays aggregation by forming a reservoir of protofibrils. PLoS ONE. 2006;1:e111. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Masino L., Kelly G., Pastore A. Solution structure of polyglutamine tracts in GST-polyglutamine fusion proteins. FEBS Lett. 2002;513:267–272. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(02)02335-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Nagai Y., Inui T., Toda T. A toxic monomeric conformer of the polyglutamine protein. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2007;14:332–340. doi: 10.1038/nsmb1215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Popiel H.A., Nagai Y., Toda T. Disruption of the toxic conformation of the expanded polyglutamine stretch leads to suppression of aggregate formation and cytotoxicity. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2004;317:1200–1206. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.03.161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Goehler H., Dröge A., Wanker E.E. Pathogenic polyglutamine tracts are potent inducers of spontaneous Sup35 and Rnq1 amyloidogenesis. PLoS ONE. 2010;5:e9642. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ordway J.M., Tallaksen-Greene S., Detloff P.J. Ectopically expressed CAG repeats cause intranuclear inclusions and a progressive late onset neurological phenotype in the mouse. Cell. 1997;91:753–763. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80464-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Phillips G.N., Arduini R.M., Sligar S.G. Crystal structure of myoglobin from a synthetic gene. Proteins. 1990;7:358–365. doi: 10.1002/prot.340070407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Eliezer D., Wright P.E. Is apomyoglobin a molten globule? Structural characterization by NMR. J. Mol. Biol. 1996;263:531–538. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lecomte J.T.J., Sukits S.F., Falzone C.J. Conformational properties of native sperm whale apomyoglobin in solution. Protein Sci. 1999;8:1484–1491. doi: 10.1110/ps.8.7.1484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Samatova E.N., Melnik B.S., Bychkova V.E. Folding intermediate and folding nucleus for I—>N and U—>I—>N transitions in apomyoglobin: contributions by conserved and nonconserved residues. Biophys. J. 2010;98:1694–1702. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.12.4326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Li W., Serpell L.C., Huntington J.A. Expression and characterization of full-length human huntingtin, an elongated HEAT repeat protein. J. Biol. Chem. 2006;281:15916–15922. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M511007200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Albrecht M., Golatta M., Lengauer T. Structural and functional analysis of ataxin-2 and ataxin-3. Eur. J. Biochem. 2004;271:3155–3170. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.2004.04245.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Nicastro G., Habeck M., Pastore A. Structure validation of the Josephin domain of ataxin-3: conclusive evidence for an open conformation. J. Biomol. NMR. 2006;36:267–277. doi: 10.1007/s10858-006-9092-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Huntley M.A., Golding G.B. Simple sequences are rare in the Protein Data Bank. Proteins. 2002;48:134–140. doi: 10.1002/prot.10150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Behrends C., Langer C.A., Hartl F.U. Chaperonin TRiC promotes the assembly of polyQ expansion proteins into nontoxic oligomers. Mol. Cell. 2006;23:887–897. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.08.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.de Chiara C., Menon R.P., Pastore A. The AXH domain adopts alternative folds the solution structure of HBP1 AXH. Structure. 2005;13:743–753. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2005.02.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Fändrich M., Fletcher M.A., Dobson C.M. Amyloid fibrils from muscle myoglobin. Nature. 2001;410:165–166. doi: 10.1038/35065514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Chow C., Kurt N., Cavagnero S. Structural characterization of apomyoglobin self-associated species in aqueous buffer and urea solution. Biophys. J. 2006;90:298–309. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.105.070227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Onai T., Koizumi M., Hirai M. Initial process of amyloid formation of apomyoglobin and effect of glycosphingolipid G(M1) J. Appl. Cryst. 2007;40:S184–S189. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Tanaka M., Machida Y., Nukina N. The effects of aggregation-inducing motifs on amyloid formation of model proteins related to neurodegenerative diseases. Biochemistry. 2002;41:10277–10286. doi: 10.1021/bi0258905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Tanaka M., Morishima I., Nukina N. Intra- and intermolecular β-pleated sheet formation in glutamine-repeat inserted myoglobin as a model for polyglutamine diseases. J. Biol. Chem. 2001;276:45470–45475. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M107502200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Tobelmann M.D., Kerby R.L., Murphy R.M. A strategy for generating polyglutamine ‘length libraries’ in model host proteins. Protein Eng. Des. Sel. 2008;21:161–164. doi: 10.1093/protein/gzm078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Reference deleted in proof.
  • 44.Silva J.L., Miles E.W., Weber G. Pressure dissociation and conformational drift of the β-dimer of tryptophan synthase. Biochemistry. 1986;25:5780–5786. doi: 10.1021/bi00367a065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Husain-Ponnampalam R., Turnbull V., Storey E. Expression and purification of ataxin-1 protein. J. Neurosci. Methods. 2010;189:30–35. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Iannuzzi C., Vilasi S., Sirangelo I. Heme binding inhibits the fibrillization of amyloidogenic apomyoglobin and determines lack of aggregate cytotoxicity. Protein Sci. 2007;16:507–516. doi: 10.1110/ps.062471107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Kim M.W., Chelliah Y., Bezprozvanny I. Secondary structure of Huntingtin amino-terminal region. Structure. 2009;17:1205–1212. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2009.08.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Davies P., Watt K., McEwan I.J. Consequences of poly-glutamine repeat length for the conformation and folding of the androgen receptor amino-terminal domain. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 2008;41:301–314. doi: 10.1677/JME-08-0042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Sirangelo I., Tavassi S., Irace G. Tryptophanyl contributions to apomyoglobin fluorescence resolved by site-directed mutagenesis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2000;1476:173–180. doi: 10.1016/s0167-4838(99)00257-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Chen Y., Barkley M.D. Toward understanding tryptophan fluorescence in proteins. Biochemistry. 1998;37:9976–9982. doi: 10.1021/bi980274n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Sirangelo I., Bismuto E., Irace G. Apomyoglobin folding intermediates characterized by the hydrophobic fluorescent probe 8-anilino-1-naphthalene sulfonate. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1998;1385:69–77. doi: 10.1016/s0167-4838(98)00038-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Williamson T.E., Vitalis A., Pappu R.V. Modulation of polyglutamine conformations and dimer formation by the N-terminus of huntingtin. J. Mol. Biol. 2010;396:1295–1309. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2009.12.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Ladurner A.G., Fersht A.R. Glutamine, alanine or glycine repeats inserted into the loop of a protein have minimal effects on stability and folding rates. J. Mol. Biol. 1997;273:330–337. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Fändrich M., Forge V., Diekmann S. Myoglobin forms amyloid fibrils by association of unfolded polypeptide segments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2003;100:15463–15468. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0303758100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Lunkes A., Trottier Y., Mandel J.L. Properties of polyglutamine expansion in vitro and in a cellular model for Huntington's disease. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 1999;354:1013–1019. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1999.0453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Gales L., Cortes L., Macedo-Ribeiro S. Towards a structural understanding of the fibrillization pathway in Machado-Joseph's disease: trapping early oligomers of non-expanded ataxin-3. J. Mol. Biol. 2005;353:642–654. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.08.061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Ellisdon A.M., Thomas B., Bottomley S.P. The two-stage pathway of ataxin-3 fibrillogenesis involves a polyglutamine-independent step. J. Biol. Chem. 2006;281:16888–16896. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M601470200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Poirier M.A., Li H.L., Ross C.A. Huntingtin spheroids and protofibrils as precursors in polyglutamine fibrilization. J. Biol. Chem. 2002;277:41032–41037. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M205809200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Takahashi T., Kikuchi S., Onodera O. Soluble polyglutamine oligomers formed prior to inclusion body formation are cytotoxic. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2008;17:345–356. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddm311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Legleiter J., Mitchell E., Muchowski P.J. Mutant huntingtin fragments form oligomers in a polyglutamine length-dependent manner in vitro and in vivo. J. Biol. Chem. 2010;285:14777–14790. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.093708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Siwach P., Pophaly S.D., Ganesh S. Genomic and evolutionary insights into genes encoding proteins with single amino acid repeats. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2006;23:1357–1369. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msk022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Siwach P., Sengupta S., Ganesh S. Spatial positions of homopolymeric repeats in the human proteome and their effect on cellular toxicity. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2009;380:382–386. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.01.101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Nekooki-Machida Y., Kurosawa M., Tanaka M. Distinct conformations of in vitro and in vivo amyloids of huntingtin-exon1 show different cytotoxicity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2009;106:9679–9684. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0812083106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Document S1. Materials and methods and four figures
mmc1.pdf (105.3KB, pdf)

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES