Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jun 20.
Published in final edited form as: Chemistry. 2009 Nov 2;15(43):11723–11729. doi: 10.1002/chem.200900643

A Panel of Cytochrome P450 BM3 Variants To Produce Drug Metabolites and Diversify Lead Compounds

Andrew M Sawayama [a], Michael M Y Chen [a], Palaniappan Kulanthaivel [b], Ming-Shang Kuo [b], Horst Hemmerle [b], Frances H Arnold [a],*
PMCID: PMC3118466  NIHMSID: NIHMS297808  PMID: 19774562

Abstract

Here we demonstrate that a small panel of variants of cytochrome P450 BM3 from Bacillus megaterium covers the breadth of reactivity of human P450s by producing 12 of 13 mammalian metabolites for two marketed drugs, verapamil and astemizole, and one research compound. The most active enzymes support preparation of individual metabolites for preclinical bioactivity and toxicology evaluations. Underscoring their potential utility in drug lead diversification, engineered P450 BM3 variants also produce novel metabolites by catalyzing reactions at carbon centers beyond those targeted by animal and human P450s. Production of a specific metabolite can be improved by directed evolution of the enzyme catalyst. Some variants are more active on the more hydrophobic parent drug than on its metabolites, which limits production of multiply-hydroxylated species, a preference that appears to depend on the evolutionary history of the P450 variant.

Keywords: cytochrome P450 C-H bond activation, drug metabolism, oxidation, drug development

Introduction

Selective C-H oxidation represents one of the great challenges for which synthetic chemists find only very substrate-specific solutions.[1-4] Breakthroughs in selective C-H oxidation methodology could benefit drug discovery, among other fields, by enabling rapid and parallel analog construction for a specific molecular scaffold. Such improvements in efficiency would greatly increase the number and variety of compounds that could be produced, increasing the likelihood of identifying effective therapeutic agents.

Many synthetic strategies for C-H oxidation rely on a reactive intermediate that plays upon subtle differences in C-H bond strength (1-5 kcal/mol) to achieve regioselectivity.[5] Owing to the large number of C-H bonds in most bioactive chemicals, identifying a reagent that can react at one C-H bond in preference to all others can be difficult, or even impossible. Nature solves the selectivity problem by incorporating discrete molecular recognition elements into enzyme catalysts so that they can use specific enzyme-substrate interactions to impart reactivity to a specific C-H bond.

Cytochromes P450 (CYPs) are a large superfamily of heme-containing C-H oxidation enzymes. In humans, CYPs play key roles in drug metabolism and clearance. An ability to predict how potential pharmaceuticals will be metabolized will better equip us to identify derivatives with improved biological activity, solubility, toxicity, stability or bioavailability.[6] In fact, FDA guidelines indicate that uniquely human metabolites and metabolites present at disproportionately higher levels in humans as compared to the animal species used during standard toxicology testing may require safety assessment before beginning large-scale clinical trials.[7]

Preparation of these metabolites at sufficient scale for evaluation is non-trivial and often requires a de novo synthesis for each metabolite. Biosynthetic methods that employ purified human CYPs or crude liver microsomes are not much better, because human CYPs are poorly stable, membrane-bound, multi-protein systems that exhibit low reaction rates. As an alternative to using human CYPs as biocatalysts for metabolite production, we and others have focused on soluble, bacterial P450 BM3 (also known as CYP102A1)[8] as a C-H oxidation platform.[9-11] Derived from Bacillus megaterium, P450 BM3 has properties that greatly facilitate its engineering and use in synthesis: it can be expressed at high levels in recombinant E. coli (~12% dry cell mass), and, unlike nearly all other CYPs, its hydroxylase, reductase and electron transfer domains are all in one contiguous polypeptide chain. This last feature may contribute to its relatively high activity (>1000 turnovers/min) on its preferred fatty acid substrates.[8] Like most CYPs implicated in anabolic pathways, P450 BM3 is substrate-specific, hydroxylating a C-20 fatty acid over a C-12 fatty acid with more than 200 fold higher efficiency.[12]

We chose three structurally diverse drug compounds with known patterns of mammalian CYP-dependent clearance to evaluate whether P450 BM3 variants can catalyze similar C-H oxidations. Verapamil is a calcium channel blocker used in the treatment of hypertension and arrhythmia.[13] Astemizole is a potent H1-histamine receptor antagonist used for treatment of common sinus allergy symptoms.[14] The third compound, LY294002, is an antiproliferative that inhibits phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, a target with potential for treatment of malignancies.[15] We report here that a small collection of P450 BM3 variants can produce nearly all the known human (or rat) metabolites for each of the three drugs. Within each set of active enzyme variants, we identified several that produce selected metabolites in yields and activities suitable for preparative scale synthesis. We also identified variants that generate metabolites not produced by rat liver microsome controls nor known to be human metabolites, demonstrating the ability of this C-H oxidation platform to target a range of carbon centers.

Results

Selection of P450 Variants

From our extensive collections we selected 120 P450 BM3 variants that had previously demonstrated activity on substrates not in the wildtype enzyme’s repertoire. These variants were constructed using a variety of commonly implemented genetic diversification techniques, including error-prone PCR and targeted mutagenesis of active site residues. We also included variants derived from structure-guided recombination of BM3 and its homologs CYP102A2 and CYP102A3 to produce chimeric enzymes.[16] These enzymes had been selected based on their activities towards a variety of substrates, including straight chain alkanes, cycloalkanes, alkyl ethers,[17-19] aromatic compounds,[20] derivatives of fatty acids,[21] and drugs.[10, 22]

We also distinguished between enzyme variants that function as monooxygenases, using NADPH to reduce the catalytic Fe(III) center, and peroxygenases that contain only the heme domain and use H2O2 in place of O2 and NADPH. Each has its own catalytic and operational advantages and disadvantages that have been described elsewhere.[21] Though we had evidence that the presence of a reductase domain impacts activity favorably,[20] we were unsure what effect, if any, this domain would have on regioselectivity. The variants, their sequences relative to wildtype, and the criteria for their prior selection from mutant libraries are described in Supplementary Table 1.

Reactions with Human and Bacterial CYPs

Verapamil and astemizole undergo extensive biotransformation by the major human CYPs to produce demethylated and dealkylated products[23] by hydroxylation of activated carbon centers adjacent to heteroatoms (summarized in Tables 1A, 2A). Experiments conducted with rat liver microsomes in vitro indicate that LY294002 metabolism is confined to single and double alkyl hydroxylations of the morpholine ring (Table 3), a pattern also observed in other drugs possessing this moiety.

Table 1.

Conversion of verapamil to A) its most abundanta human metabolites and B) new metabolites by different P450 BM3 variants.

graphic file with name nihms-297808-t0001.jpg
Variantb % Con-
version
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 2C11 25 8 28 20 8 8 28
2 9C1 c 31 3 29 3 6 13 3 10 13
3 D6H10 78 26 8 31 3 24
4 22313333 34 41 15 20 9 15
5 22313231 43 46 33 5 16
6 32313233 24 50 21 13 17
7 32313233-R1 25 40 44 16
8 21312332 6 17 33 17 33
9 9-10A A78F 30 10 83
10 9-10A A82L 51 2 94
11 9-10A F87L 49 6 94
12 12-10C 34 6 6 79 3
13 7-11D 21 28 29 14 29
a

>1% abundance following oral 14C verapamil administration in humans.[23]

b

variants in italics were selected for activity on propranolol,[22] variants in bold are chimeras,[16] variants in normal type were selected for activity on alkanes.[18, 19]

Chimeras are written according to fragment composition: 32313233-R1, for example, represents a protein which inherits the first fragment from parent CYP102A3, the second from CYP102A2, the third from CYP102A3, and so on. R1 connotes a fusion to the reductase domain from parent A1. Chimera fusions were used as monooxygenases; chimera heme domains were used as peroxygenases.

c

Because not all P450 BM3 oxidation products could be identified, product distributions totals may be less than 100%.

Table 2.

Conversion of astemizole to A) its most abundant human metabolites and B) new metabolites by different P450 BM3 variants.

graphic file with name nihms-297808-t0002.jpg
Variantb % Con-
version
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
1 DE10 9 56
2 21313311 10 20 40 40
3 22313333 9 22 56 22
4 9-10A A78F 21 48 38 14
5 9-10A A78T 27 37 7 44 4
6 9-10A A82S 30 20 7 70 3
7 9-10A F87L 36 3 88 6
8 41-5B 5 100
9 32313233 11 45 27 27
10 32313233-R1 16 13 69
11 32312333-R1 78 4 67 9
12 9-10A A78S 15 13 7 80
13 9-10A A82L 49 24 61 4
14 9-10A A82I 32 31 6 63
15 9-10A F87A 31 23 16 45
a

>1% abundance following oral 14C astemizole administration in humans.[25] See Table 1 for further explanation of variant nomenclature.

Table 3.

Conversion of LY294002 by different P450 BM3 variants into the most abundant metabolites produced by rat liver microsomes.

graphic file with name nihms-297808-t0003.jpg
Variantb % Conversion 18 19 20
1 9-10A L75I 10 50
2 9-10A A78S 7 71
3 9-10A F87V 6 100
4 9-10A T260S 11 9
5 68-8F 9 11
a

>1% abundance following in vitro reaction of LY294002 with rat liver microsomes.

b

variants in normal type were selected for activity on alkanes.[18, 19]

Reactions of the 120 P450 BM3 variants with each of the three drugs were assessed by HPLC. Metabolite products were evident in the HPLC traces for a significant number of variants (43 exhibited some activity on verapamil, 42 on astemizole and 18 on LY294002); the metabolites and their distributions were subsequently characterized using LCMS and MS/MS (Supplementary Tables 3, 4 and 5). Metabolite structure assignments were aided by comparison of MS and MS/MS spectra with spectra of known metabolites obtained in our laboratories using rat microsomal systems.

Verapamil

Table 1 summarizes the performance of selected enzymes on verapamil (all 43 active enzymes and their product distributions are listed in Supplementary Table 3). For example, Entry 4 displays the activity of chimera 22313333 on verapamil. It converts 34% of the starting material into an assortment of products, the distribution of which is 40% 2, 15% 5, 21% 6, 9% 7 and 15 % 10. Variants 2C11 and 9C1 furnished the widest array of products, with 6 and 8 individual metabolites respectively. In particular, 9C1 produced several metabolites that had undergone two hydroxylation events (1, 4 and 8). Variant 22313333 (Entry 4) was the only enzyme capable of producing double hydroxylation product 5, while 32313233 (Entry 6) best produced norverapamil 3. Interestingly, the addition of reductase as a fusion to the 32313233 heme domain (Entry 7) rendered the enzyme unable to produce new metabolite 7. 7-11D (Entry 13) differs by no more than two mutations from the variants in each of Entries 9-12, but its product distribution more closely parallels chimera 21312332. The 9-10A family of enzymes was the most active, with conversions exceeding 30% (Entries 9-12), and produced metabolite 7 with excellent selectivity.

The enzymes that best mimicked human CYP reactivity on verapamil were derived from two variant families. Three had been isolated by directed evolution for activity on propranolol,[22] while the remaining four were chimeras.[16, 24] The BM3 variants that best produced new metabolites were derived from the alkane-hydroxylating 9-10A variant.[18, 19] These enzymes catalyzed a new regioselective demethylation reaction at position R4 and a new benzylic oxidation at position R3. Even without optimization of the reaction conditions, some enzymes were highly active on verapamil: D6H10 (Entry 3), for example, transformed verapamil into metabolites at 78% conversion and a total turnover number (TTN) greater than 1500.

The enzymes possess contrasting degrees of regioselectivity. Some were non-selective, producing a spectrum of metabolites (e.g. propranolol-evolved enzymes 2C11, 9C1, D6H10). By contrast, chimera 22313231 produced norverapamil 2, chimera 32313233-R1 made dealkylated compound 6 (Entries 5 and 7), and many variants produced new metabolites 7 and 10 (Entries 8-13) with sufficient selectivity (≥30%) for larger scale production without further optimization. To demonstrate that useful quantities of metabolites can be produced, we used purified 9-10A F87L and used it to produce metabolite 7 (9.4 mg) from verapamil (25 mg) in 39% yield (1560 TTN, 0.025 mol% catalyst).

Astemizole

Activity of the enzyme panel on astemizole resulted in the seven metabolites described in Table 2 (all 42 active enzymes and their product distributions are listed in Supplementary Table 4). Variants DE10, 21313311, 22313333, 323313233 (Entries 1, 2 3 and 10) produced dealkylated metabolite 14 in preference to other compounds. The identity of the residue at position 78 had a strong impact on the product distribution within the 9-10A backbone; mutations at A78F, A78T and A78S (Entries 4, 5 and 13) produced metabolites 11, 13 and 15 as the most abundant respective products. Furthermore, 41-5B (Entry 8), a 9-10A family member which contains the A78F mutation (in addition to A82G and A328V), also favors demethylated 11. 9-10A A82S and 9-10A F87L both produced metabolite 13 in good yield and selectivity (Entries 6 and 7). Two chimeric monooxygenases, 32313233-R1 and 32312333-R1 (Entries 10 and 11), were effective in generating new aromatic hydroxylation product 15.

The 9-10A-derived monooxygenases were the most adept at producing human metabolites of astemizole (Entries 4-8). However, these enzymes were unable to dealkylate astemizole and produce metabolite 14. Oxidation of this more hindered C-H bond was best accomplished by the propranolol-active variants and chimeric peroxygenases (Entries 1 and 2, 3, respectively). A new benzylic site not hydroxylated by human CYPs was targeted by six chimeric BM3 enzymes to produce 17. A second benzimidazole site was hydroxylated (as demonstrated by metabolites 15 and 16), which is different from that observed in human metabolites 12 and 13. Discrimination of these sterically and electronically identical sp2 C-H bonds is virtually impossible using traditional transition metal catalysts and emphasizes the power of molecular recognition as a regiocontrolling element.

Small changes in the substrate channel can affect the regioselectivity of aromatic C-H oxidation. For instance, the presence and position of a single methyl group in Thr78 vs. Ser78 (Entry 5 vs. 12) and Ile82 vs. Leu82 (Entry 14 vs. 13) were sufficient to bias oxidation at C6 instead of at another position on the benzimidazole ring. Product 16 has undergone two oxidations. Though this metabolite was observed in reactions with 10 variants, it was produced in greater than 10% abundance by only one (Entry 4). New metabolite 15 is a candidate for scale up and could be produced at high conversion (>25% selectivity) by 15 variants of different lineages (Supplementary Table 4). Even without optimization of reaction conditions, several enzymes showed good activity towards astemizole. Variant 32312333-R1, for example, converted 78% astemizole into metabolites (70 TTN).

LY294002

The most abundant metabolites produced by rat liver microsomes are detailed in Table 3. Both single hydroxylation products 19 and 20 were identified in BM3 variant reactions with very good regioselectivity. Aminoalcohol 18 is the sole metabolite of all three drugs not observed in the reactions. Derivative 18 requires two oxidations and may not appear simply due to the low conversion in these 96-well plate reactions.

The P450s catalyzing the single hydroxylations were monooxygenases derived from 9-10A (Table 3). Though several variants could produce metabolite 19, only 9-10A F87V oxidized the other position of the morpholine ring and made derivative 20 (Entry 3). The remaining 12 metabolite-producing variants were also monooxygenases, of both 9-10A and chimeric origin, and produced a metabolite with Mw=238, indicating morpholine loss and addition of water to the bis-aryl backbone (Supplementary Table 5). In all cases, LY294002 conversion was very low (<15%), which correlates with the low rat liver microsome conversion for LY294002 (40%) relative to microsome activity on verapamil (85%) and astemizole (85%). LY294002 better evades both mammalian and bacterial P450-catalyzed C-H oxidation than verapamil and astemizole under the same conditions.

Activities On Singly-Hydroxylated Metabolites

Of the 12 mammalian metabolites produced by the P450 BM3 variants, eight were made with sufficiently high selectivity to enable preparative scale production without further optimization (2, 3, 6, 11, 13, 14, 19 and 20). Of the seven new metabolites to which structures could be assigned, four were made with sufficiently high regioselectivity to enable preparative scale production (7, 10, 15 and 17). All 11 of the highly produced metabolites arose from single oxidations. Seven of the eight remaining metabolites are the products of two or more oxidations and are present as minor components in mixtures with the singly-hydroxylated products. Of the 69 individual reactions that underwent appreciable conversion (≥10% drug consumed), only five generated products of multiple C-H oxidations in ≥10% abundance.

The remainder contained single-oxidation products, including mixtures of singly-oxidized species. The lack of bis-hydroxylated products could reflect a regiochemical effect in which the second C-H site is less reactive. In this case, one of the two possible single-hydroxylation products would be favored. Sixteen variants produced only one single-hydroxylation product; reaction mixtures from 10 additional variants contained two (metabolites were present in 1:1 to 3:1 ratios in 6/11 reactions). It is also possible that the relative lack of bis-hydroxylation products reflects discrimination on the part of the enzymes, in which the BM3 binds and hydroxylates the parent drug in preference to its metabolites. Because BM3-catalyzed C-H oxidation increases polarity by either unmasking heteroatoms or formally substituting hydrogen with a hydroxyl group, production of poly-hydroxylated metabolites could be disfavored, for example, if the enzyme prefers a more hydrophobic substrate.

To assess enzyme activity on the metabolites produced by a single oxidation, all 120 enzymes were incubated with purified demethylated metabolites norverapamil 3 and desmethylastemizole[26] 11. Product distributions and extents of reaction were determined by HPLC. In every case where an enzyme was active on both parent drug and metabolite, regioselectivities were unchanged, indicating that the metabolite and parent drug bind in similar orientations. Comparison of each enzyme’s activity on the parent drug and the associated metabolite showed that enzymes from the alkane-evolved 9-10A lineage tended to be more active on astemizole and verapamil than on their metabolites (true of 49 out of 55 active enzymes) (Table 4). Because neither the N-methyl group of verapamil nor the O-methyl group of astemizole is the preferred site for C-H oxidation by the alkane-evolved variants, this bias may reflect a preference for the more hydrophobic substrate. In contrast, when this pairwise reaction matrix is analyzed across the propranolol-evolved and chimeric P450 BM3 lineages, there is no statistical difference from random at the 95% confidence interval (0.43 ≤ p = 0.60 ≤ 0.77).

Table 4.

Preference for more hydrophobic parent drug over its metabolite depends on evolutionary history of the variant.

P450 Variant Family Number of P450s More
Active on Parent Drug
Number of P450s More
Active on Metabolite
Alkane-selected lineage 49/55 6/55
Propranolol-selected and
 chimera lineages
18/30 12/30

Directed Evolution Can Improve Metabolite Production

None of the 120 members of this catalyst panel had been selected for activity on any of the three drugs. Thus, any initial activity represents a promiscuous activity; such side activities are often easy to improve by directed evolution.[27, 28] Of the 103 enzymes that reacted with these substrates, 9-10A F87L possessed the best combination of activity and regioselectivity (Table 2, Entry 7); its reaction with astemizole, which produces metabolite 13 with 88% selectivity, is representative of a reaction for which one would like to improve metabolite production. We speculated that a high throughput screen for improved overall aromatic hydroxylation activity would yield at least a few variants that retained this regioselectivity while producing more metabolite. We screened 2,000 variants made by error-prone PCR of the 9-10A F87L gene using a colorimetric screen for products of aromatic hydroxylation[29] and identified three new sequences with improved metabolite production (Table 5). The new variants improved the conversion to 51-52% while preserving high regioselectivity (~80% for metabolite 13).

Table 5.

Production of astemizole metabolites by 9-10A F87L variants.

Variant % Conversion % Selectivity 13
1 9-10A F87L 34 88
2 E4D D68G 51 80
3 C205R D338G 51 80
4 E4D H92Q 52 75

Discussion

A small, 120-member panel of P450 BM3 variants captured nearly all of the mammalian P450 scope of reactivity by producing 12 of 13 known metabolites. In their ability to mimic human CYPs, the P450 BM3 variants demonstrated considerable versatility, activating C-H bonds of varying strength (90-105 kcal/mol) and steric encumbrance (sp2 vs. sp3 and 1° vs. 2° carbon centers). We were able to assign structures to 7 new metabolites (Tables 1B, 2B), all of which have undergone oxidation at new carbon centers.

Cytochrome P450 enzymes are versatile catalysts whose biological activities are encoded in a wide range of primary sequences. The 26 CYPs whose crystal structures have been solved possess as little as 15% sequence identity,[30] but share a highly conserved fold. Emphasizing the versatility of the P450 fold, P450cam and P450cin catalyze the oxidation of isosteres camphor and cineole. Although the substrates are nearly identical, the two enzymes differ not only in sequence (27% identity), but also in the structure of their active sites, most notably a complete lack of the B’ helix in P450cin.[31, 32] Whereas large changes in sequence are possible, only small perturbations are necessary to produce significant changes in function. For example, CYP2A4 and CYP2A5 differ by only 11 amino acids, yet catalyze hydroxylations on structurally dissimilar coumarin and testosterone substrates.[33]

Only 57 human enzymes[34] are responsible for known CYP-dependent drug metabolism, and a single enzyme, CYP3A4, accounts for >50% of the burden for xenobiotic CYP-mediated clearance.[35] Because CYPs can be broadly or narrowly specific, we and others have speculated that it should be possible to take advantage of the high native activity of P450 BM3 and use mutation to either relax or shift its substrate specificity in order to generate useful C-H oxidation catalysts.[9, 36-39] For example, BM3 variant 9-10A, 13 mutations away from wildtype, exhibits broad activity across short- and medium-chain alkanes, activity that is low or completely absent in its wildtype parent.[18, 19] Furthermore, 9-10A could be re-specialized to hydroxylate propane, preferring it over alkanes that differ by a single methylene group.[40] We also showed previously that a variant of 9-10A was able to hydroxylate drug-like compounds efficiently and selectively.[10] Here we wanted to determine whether variants of 9-10A and other BM3-derived enzymes could cover or even exceed the broad substrate range of mammalian CYPs. Within any catalyst panel, both extremes of regioselectivity can be useful: enzymes that already possess the desired selectivity can be used to produce individual metabolites, whereas less selective enzymes can be used to survey metabolite possibilities. Both can serve as starting sequences for directed evolution to enhance activity or tune selectivity. That a systematic and general evolutionary algorithm can be used for catalyst improvement is a particularly appealing aspect of DNA-encoded reagents. Complementary optimization studies used in traditional synthetic methods usually rely on chemical intuition to improve a catalyst and require a good understanding of the catalytic mechanism.

When we examined conversion of the parent drug versus its demethylated metabolite, we noted that one enzyme family consistently converted more of the parent drug than the demethylated and more-polar metabolite. These enzymes tend to catalyze single hydroxylations, while enzymes evolved for activity on propranolol and the chimeric variants often catalyze bis-hydroxylations. Structure-activity relationships of this type should help in the future to select enzymes that are most likely to react with as yet untested substrates and may also help predict product profiles.

Conclusions

This panel should enable rapid identification and production of relevant quantities of the human metabolites of drug candidates for pharmacological and toxicological evaluations in preclinical species.[41, 42] Although we have highlighted the potential of these enzymes to accelerate preparation of metabolites for pharmacological and toxicological testing, this enzyme panel is likely also to be useful further upstream in the drug development process as general reagents for lead diversification. Reagents that rely on molecular recognition will always be restricted in their scope of use. However, because the functionality of small molecules is not evenly distributed across all possible molecular architectures,[43] it should be worthwhile to engineer P450-derived reagents that are active on privileged scaffolds that reside in these densely functional regions of structure space. The plurality of C-H sites targeted by this small P450 BM3 variant set—including and extending human P450 metabolism—augurs well for the development of a truly general panel of C-H oxidation catalysts.

Experimental Section

All chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, Inc. or provided by Eli Lilly directly. Solvents were purchased from EM Sciences. Lysis enzymes were purchased from Sigma. Absorbance measurements were conducted using a SpectraMax 384 Plus plate reader. HPLC separations were performed using a Supelco Discovery C18 column (2.1 × 150 mm, 3μ on a Waters 2690 Separation module in conjunction with a Waters 996 PDA detector. LCMS and MS/MS spectra were obtained using the ThermoFinnigan LCQ classic at the shared Caltech MS facility.

Protein Expression

LB agar plates supplemented with 100 μg/mL ampicillin were streaked with the catalase-deficient strain of E. coli SN0037[44] (for peroxygenase) or DH5α E. coli (for monooxygenase) containing a desired P450 BM3 variant on the isopropyl β-D-thiogalactopyranoisde (IPTG)-inducible pCWori vector.[45] These were grown at 37 °C for 12 h before single clones were picked and added in quadruplicate to 1 mL 96-well plates containing 400 μL LB medium supplemented with 100 μg/mL ampicillin. After shaking at 80% humidity, 30 °C for 24 h to grow the pre-cultures to saturation, a 50 μL aliquot was used to inoculate 2 mL 96-well plates containing 900 μL TB medium supplemented with 100 μg/mL ampicillin. After shaking at 80% humidity, 30 °C for 5 h, P450 expression was induced by adding 500 mM IPTG and the heme precursor δ-aminolevulinic acid (δ -ALA) to a final concentration of 1 mM. The cultures were grown for another 24 h before the cells were pelleted and stored at −20 °C.

Activity-Based Screening

All three drugs and two metabolites were screened in against the cell lysate of the panel of 120 variants. Lysate was prepared by resuspending cell pellet with 600 μL of a buffer containing 10 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mg/mL lysozyme and 8 U/mL DNAseI. Holoenzyme reactions used 0.1 M phosphate, pH=8 as the buffer and peroxygenase reactions used 0.1M EPPS, pH=8.2 as the buffer. The lysis reactions were incubated at 37 °C for 1 h and then spun down to use the supernatant in three assays:

CO-binding

Heme proteins absorb light at 450 nm corresponding to the CO stretch frequency when the Fe-heme is bound to CO. This Soret band can be used to quantify the amount of folded protein.[46] Conditions: To a 96-well flat bottom screening plate was added lysate (100 μL), sodium dithionite (100 μL, 140 mM in 1 M buffer, pH=8). These were pre-read on a plate reader at 450 nm and 490 nm before incubating in a 1 atm CO chamber for 15 minutes. The plate was then read again at 450 nm and 490 nm.

Enzymatic Activity

To a 96-well deep well (2mL) plate, the following mixtures were prepared for each of the activity-based assays: Holoenzyme: lysate (60 μL), phosphate (110 μL, 0.1 M, pH=8), drug/metabolite (10 μL, 5 mM), NADPH (20 μL, 20 mM). Peroxygenase: lysate (50 μL), EPPS (100 μL, 0.1 M, pH=8.2), drug/metabolite (10 μL, 20 mM), hydrogen peroxide (40 μL, 5 mM).

Upon ultimate addition of NADPH or H2O2, the plates were briefly shaken and allowed to react for 2 h. At this time, acetonitrile (200 μL) was added to quench the reaction. The reactions were spun down and the supernatants used for subsequent analysis by HPLC and LCMS.

HPLC

25 μL supernatant was analyzed by HPLC. Conditions with solvent A (0.2% formic acid (v/v) in H2O) and solvent B (acetonitrile) used to elute the products of metabolism were: 0-3 min, A:B 90:10; 3-25 min, linear gradient to A:B 30:70; 25-30 min, linear gradient to A:B 10:90.

LCMS, MS/MS

Identical conditions to the HPLC method detailed above were used for the LC portion of the analysis. The MS was operated in positive ESI mode. MS/MS spectra were acquired in a data dependent manner for the most intense ions.

Preparation of Metabolite 7

To a 250 mL Erlenmeyer flask containing potassium phosphate buffer (50 mL, 100 mM, pH=8.0) was added glucose-6-phosphate (80 mM), glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (2 U/mL), superoxide dismutase (100 U/mL), 9-10A F87L (250 nM), verapamil (24.6 mg, 1 mM) and NADP (5 mM). These reagents were stirred vigorously at room temperature while metabolite production was monitored every hour for 4 h by HPLC. The reaction was quenched by precipitating the enzymes with acetonitrile (50 mL) and stirring an additional 30 min followed by filtration. The resulting solution contained 9.4 mg metabolite 7 (39%).

Directed Evolution of 9-10A F87L for Activity on Astemizole

Error-prone PCR was used to create the variant library. Cells containing the 9-10A F87L template on a pCWori plasmid were grown and plasmid DNA isolated. Error prone PCR reactions of volume 50 μl contained the following: water (38 μL), 10 × Applied Biosystems PCR Buffer (5 μL), forward primer ggaaacaggatccatcgatgc (1 μL, 10 μM), reverse primer gtgaaggaataccgccaagc (1 μL, 10 μM) and template plasmid (0.5 μl, 200 ng/μl), Taq polymerase (1 μL, 5 U/μl), dNTP (1 μL, 10 μM) and MnCl2 (2.5 μL 1 mM). PCR conditions were 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 30 cycles of 30 s a 95 °C, 60 s at 52 °C and 120 s at 72 °C. The PCR products were treated with DpnI to remove template DNA followed by digestion with BamHI and SacI. Following agarose gel purification, the oligonucleotide library was ligated into the pCWori vector and then electroporated into DH5α E. coli cells. The transformants were plated on LB agar medium supplemented with 100 μg/ml of ampicillin and grown at 37 °C over 16 h. Protein was expressed, as described in the Protein Expression portion of the Experimental section. Variant hits were identified by first screening using a high throughput colorimetric assay for aromatic hydroxylation.[29] Cells were lysed and prepared for reaction as described previously. Upon ultimate addition of NADPH or H2O2, the plates were briefly shaken and allowed to react for 2h. At this time, urea (60 μL, 8 M in 200 mM NaOH), 4-aminoantipyrine (18 μL, 1.2%) and potassium peroxodisulfate (18 μL, 1.2%) were added. Absorption at 510 nm was measured after 10 min. Reactions containing variant enzymes more active than 9-10A F87L parent were repeated and characterized by HPLC, LCMS and MS/MS as described previously. Validated hits were sequenced.

Supplementary Material

Supporting Information
TOC

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by NIH grant GM068664, the Jacobs Institute for Molecular Engineering and Medicine at Caltech, Eli Lilly and Co., and an NSF predoctoral fellowship to MMYC. We thank Dr. Terry Lindstrom for a critical reading of the manuscript.

Footnotes

Bacterial cytochrome P450s hydroxylate specific C-H bonds and mimic some of their human liver counterparts. A collection of 120 variants of a single bacterial P450 screened in 96-well plates produced nearly all the known human metabolites for three different drugs as well as many new metabolites, often with high conversion and selectivity.

References

  • [1].Bergman RG. Nature. 2007;446:391–393. doi: 10.1038/446391a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Crabtree RH. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 2001:2437–2450. [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Godula K, Sames D. Science. 2006;312:67–72. doi: 10.1126/science.1114731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Labinger JA, Bercaw JE. Nature. 2002;417:507–514. doi: 10.1038/417507a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Chen MS, White MC. Science. 2007;318:783–787. doi: 10.1126/science.1148597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Johnson MD, Zuo H, Lee KH, Trebley JP, Rae JM, Weatherman RV, Desta Z, Flockhart DA, Skaar TC. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2004;85:151–159. doi: 10.1023/B:BREA.0000025406.31193.e8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].FDA . FDA Guidance of Industry Safety Testing of Drug Metabolites Homepage. [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Narhi LO, Fulco AJ. J. Biol. Chem. 1986;261:7160–7169. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].van Vugt-Lussenburg BMA, Stjernschantz E, Lastdrager J, Oostenbrink C, Vermeulen NPE, Commandeur JNM. J. Med. Chem. 2007;50:455–461. doi: 10.1021/jm0609061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Landwehr M, Hochrein L, Otey CR, Kasrayan A, Backvall JE, Arnold FH. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006;128:6058–6059. doi: 10.1021/ja061261x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Budde M, Morr M, Schmid RD, Urlacher VB. ChemBioChem. 2006;7:789–794. doi: 10.1002/cbic.200500444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Ost TWB, Miles CS, Munro AW, Murdoch J, Reid GA, Chapman SK. Biochemistry. 2001;40:13421–13429. doi: 10.1021/bi010716m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Mctavish D, Sorkin EM. Drugs. 1989;38:19–76. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198938010-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Richards DM, Brogden RN, Heel RC, Speight TM, Avery GS. Drugs. 1984;28:38–61. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198428010-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Vlahos CJ, Matter WF, Hui KY, Brown RF. J. Biol. Chem. 1994;269:5241–5248. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Otey CR, Landwehr M, Endelman JB, Hiraga K, Bloom JD, Arnold FH. PLoS Biol. 2006;4:789–798. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Glieder A, Farinas ET, Arnold FH. Nat. Biotechnol. 2002;20:1135–1139. doi: 10.1038/nbt744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Peters MW, Meinhold P, Glieder A, Arnold FH. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003;125:13442–13450. doi: 10.1021/ja0303790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Meinhold P, Peters MW, Hartwick A, Hernandez AR, Arnold FH. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2006;348:763–772. [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Landwehr M, Carbone M, Otey CR, Li YG, Arnold FH. Chem. Biol. 2007;14:269–278. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2007.01.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Cirino PC, Arnold FH. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003;42:3299–3301. doi: 10.1002/anie.200351434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Otey CR, Bandara G, Lalonde J, Takahashi K, Arnold FH. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2006;93:494–499. doi: 10.1002/bit.20744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Eichelbaum M, Ende M, Remberg G, Schomerus M, Dengler HJ. Drug Metab. Dispos. 1979;7:145–148. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [24].Li YG, Drummond DA, Sawayama AM, Snow CD, Bloom JD, Arnold FH. Nat. Biotechnol. 2007;25:1051–1056. doi: 10.1038/nbt1333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Meuldermans W, Hendrickx J, Lauwers W, Hurkmans R, Swysen E, Heykants J. Drug Dev. Res. 1986;8:37–51. [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Janssens F, Torremans J, Janssen M, Stokbroekx RA, Luyckx M, Janssen PAJ. J. Med. Chem. 1985;28:1934–1943. doi: 10.1021/jm00150a029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Joo H, Lin ZL, Arnold FH. Nature. 1999;399:670–673. [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Moore JC, Arnold FH. Nat. Biotechnol. 1996;14:458–467. doi: 10.1038/nbt0496-458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [29].Otey CR, Joern JM. In: Methods Mol Biol. Arnold FH, Georgiou G, editors. Vol. 230. Humana Press; Totowa: 2003. pp. 141–148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [30].Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994;22:4673–4680. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.22.4673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [31].Meharenna YT, Li HY, Hawkes DB, Pearson AG, De Voss J, Poulos TL. Biochemistry. 2004;43:9487–9494. doi: 10.1021/bi049293p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [32].Poulos TL, Finzel BC, Gunsalus IC, Wagner GC, Kraut J. J. Biol. Chem. 1985;260:6122–6130. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [33].Lindberg RLP, Negishi M. Nature. 1989;339:632–634. doi: 10.1038/339632a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [34].Lewis DFV. Pharmacogenomics. 2004;5:305–318. doi: 10.1517/phgs.5.3.305.29827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [35].Guengerich FP. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 1999;39:1–17. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.39.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [36].Appel D, Lutz-Wahl S, Fischer P, Schwaneberg U, Schmid RD. J. Biotechnol. 2001;88:167–171. doi: 10.1016/s0168-1656(01)00249-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [37].Kubo T, Peters MW, Meinhold P, Arnold FH. Chem. Eur. J. 2006;12:1216–1220. doi: 10.1002/chem.200500584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [38].Ost TWB, Miles CS, Murdoch J, Cheung YF, Reid GA, Chapman SK, Munro AW. FEBS Lett. 2000;486:173–177. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(00)02267-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [39].Sulistyaningdyah WT, Ogawa J, Li QS, Maeda C, Yano Y, Schmid RD, Shimizu S. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2005;67:556–562. doi: 10.1007/s00253-004-1761-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [40].Fasan R, Chen MM, Crook NC, Arnold FH. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007;46:8414–8418. doi: 10.1002/anie.200702616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [41].Szczebara FM, Chandelier C, Villeret C, Masurel A, Bourot S, Duport C, Blanchard S, Groisillier A, Testet E, Costaglioli P, Cauet G, Degryse E, Balbuena D, Winter J, Achstetter T, Spagnoli R, Pompon D, Dumas B. Nat. Biotechnol. 2003;21:143–149. doi: 10.1038/nbt775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [42].van Beilen JB, Holtackers R, Luscher D, Bauer U, Witholt B, Duetz WA. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005;71:1737–1744. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.4.1737-1744.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [43].Bemis GW, Murcko MA. J. Med. Chem. 1996;39:2887–2893. doi: 10.1021/jm9602928. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [44].Nakagawa S, Ishino S, Teshiba S. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 1996;60:415–420. doi: 10.1271/bbb.60.415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [45].Barnes HJ, Arlotto MP, Waterman MR. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1991;88:5597–5601. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.13.5597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [46].Omura T, Sato R. J. Biol. Chem. 1964;239:2370–2378. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting Information
TOC

RESOURCES