Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Nucleic Acids Research logoLink to Nucleic Acids Research
. 1992 Feb 25;20(4):859–864. doi: 10.1093/nar/20.4.859

The effect of DNA concentration on mobility in pulsed field gel electrophoresis.

N A Doggett 1, C L Smith 1, C R Cantor 1
PMCID: PMC312029  PMID: 1542577

Abstract

The effect of DNA concentration on pulsed field gel electrophoretic mobility was studied for human genomic DNA prepared in agarose inserts at 8-800 micrograms/ml and digested to completion with Not I. An eighth of each 100 microliter insert was used to produce DNA loads of 0.1 to 10 micrograms per lane. The mobility of single copy restriction fragments, as detected by hybridization, was largely concentration independent when DNA concentrations were 80 micrograms/ml or less. However, at DNA concentrations of 200 micrograms/ml and greater, dramatic effects of DNA concentration are evident. In the worst case, at 800 micrograms/ml, the apparent size of a DNA fragment is almost 2.5 times its true size. At constant DNA concentrations, increasing the DNA mass loads by loading larger insert slices had no further effect on DNA electrophoretic mobility, although the bands were broader for bigger insert slices. Thus, for precise and accurate sizing in pulsed field gel electrophoresis the DNA concentration in agarose inserts should not be greater than 80 micrograms/ml (10(7) diploid human cells/ml agarose insert).

Full text

PDF
859

Images in this article

860Image
on p.860
861Image
on p.861
861Image
on p.861
862Image
on p.862

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Birren B. W., Lai E., Clark S. M., Hood L., Simon M. I. Optimized conditions for pulsed field gel electrophoretic separations of DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988 Aug 11;16(15):7563–7582. doi: 10.1093/nar/16.15.7563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cantor C. R., Gaal A., Smith C. L. High-resolution separation and accurate size determination in pulsed-field gel electrophoresis of DNA. 3. Effect of electrical field shape. Biochemistry. 1988 Dec 27;27(26):9216–9221. doi: 10.1021/bi00426a021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cantor C. R., Smith C. L., Mathew M. K. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis of very large DNA molecules. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem. 1988;17:287–304. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.17.060188.001443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Carle G. F., Olson M. V. Separation of chromosomal DNA molecules from yeast by orthogonal-field-alternation gel electrophoresis. Nucleic Acids Res. 1984 Jul 25;12(14):5647–5664. doi: 10.1093/nar/12.14.5647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chu G., Vollrath D., Davis R. W. Separation of large DNA molecules by contour-clamped homogeneous electric fields. Science. 1986 Dec 19;234(4783):1582–1585. doi: 10.1126/science.3538420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Church G. M., Gilbert W. Genomic sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Apr;81(7):1991–1995. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.7.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Clark S. M., Lai E., Birren B. W., Hood L. A novel instrument for separating large DNA molecules with pulsed homogeneous electric fields. Science. 1988 Sep 2;241(4870):1203–1205. doi: 10.1126/science.3045968. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Feinberg A. P., Vogelstein B. A technique for radiolabeling DNA restriction endonuclease fragments to high specific activity. Anal Biochem. 1983 Jul 1;132(1):6–13. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(83)90418-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lawrance S. K., Smith C. L. Megabase scale restriction fragment length polymorphisms in the human major histocompatibility complex. Genomics. 1990 Oct;8(2):394–399. doi: 10.1016/0888-7543(90)90299-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mathew M. K., Hui C. F., Smith C. L., Cantor C. R. High-resolution separation and accurate size determination in pulsed-field gel electrophoresis of DNA. 4. Influence of DNA topology. Biochemistry. 1988 Dec 27;27(26):9222–9226. doi: 10.1021/bi00426a022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Mathew M. K., Smith C. L., Cantor C. R. High-resolution separation and accurate size determination in pulsed-field gel electrophoresis of DNA. 1. DNA size standards and the effect of agarose and temperature. Biochemistry. 1988 Dec 27;27(26):9204–9210. doi: 10.1021/bi00426a019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Mathew M. K., Smith C. L., Cantor C. R. High-resolution separation and accurate size determination in pulsed-field gel electrophoresis of DNA. 2. Effect of pulse time and electric field strength and implications for models of the separation process. Biochemistry. 1988 Dec 27;27(26):9210–9216. doi: 10.1021/bi00426a020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Schwartz D. C., Cantor C. R. Separation of yeast chromosome-sized DNAs by pulsed field gradient gel electrophoresis. Cell. 1984 May;37(1):67–75. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90301-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Smith C. L., Cantor C. R. Purification, specific fragmentation, and separation of large DNA molecules. Methods Enzymol. 1987;155:449–467. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(87)55030-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Snell R. G., Wilkins R. J. Separation of chromosomal DNA molecules from C.albicans by pulsed field gel electrophoresis. Nucleic Acids Res. 1986 Jun 11;14(11):4401–4406. doi: 10.1093/nar/14.11.4401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Southern E. M., Anand R., Brown W. R., Fletcher D. S. A model for the separation of large DNA molecules by crossed field gel electrophoresis. Nucleic Acids Res. 1987 Aug 11;15(15):5925–5943. doi: 10.1093/nar/15.15.5925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Nucleic Acids Research are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES