Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2011 May 14;67(Pt 6):o1391. doi: 10.1107/S1600536811017193

4,4′-Dibromo-2,2′-{ethane-1,2-diylbis[(methyl­imino)­methyl­ene]}diphenol

Augusto Rivera a,*, Jicli José Rojas a, Jaime Ríos-Motta a, Michal Dušek b, Karla Fejfarová b
PMCID: PMC3120315  PMID: 21754779

Abstract

The asymmetric unit of the title compound, C18H22Br2N2O2, contains one half-mol­ecule that is related to the other half by a center of inversion located at the mid-point of the central C—C bond. The hy­droxy (phenolic) groups are linked to the N atoms by O—H⋯N hydrogen bonds, which generate S(6) rings.

Related literature

For the synthesis, see: Rivera et al. (2010). For the uses of tetra­hydro­salens in coordination chemistry, see: Atwood (1997). For a related structure, see: Naza­renko et al. (2000). For reference bond lenghts, see: Allen et al. (1987).graphic file with name e-67-o1391-scheme1.jpg

Experimental

Crystal data

  • C18H22Br2N2O2

  • M r = 458.2

  • Orthorhombic, Inline graphic

  • a = 15.9282 (3) Å

  • b = 6.1123 (2) Å

  • c = 18.3315 (4) Å

  • V = 1784.72 (8) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Cu Kα radiation

  • μ = 5.87 mm−1

  • T = 120 K

  • 0.36 × 0.06 × 0.05 mm

Data collection

  • Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur diffractometer with an Atlas (Gemini ultra Cu) detector

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis PRO; Oxford Diffraction, 2009) T min = 0.611, T max = 1

  • 24526 measured reflections

  • 1591 independent reflections

  • 1482 reflections with I > 3σ(I)

  • R int = 0.028

Refinement

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.021

  • wR(F 2) = 0.075

  • S = 1.52

  • 1591 reflections

  • 112 parameters

  • H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement

  • Δρmax = 0.20 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.32 e Å−3

Data collection: CrysAlis PRO (Oxford Diffraction, 2009); cell refinement: CrysAlis PRO; data reduction: CrysAlis PRO; program(s) used to solve structure: SIR2002 (Burla et al., 2003); program(s) used to refine structure: JANA2006 (Petříček et al., 2006); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg & Putz, 2005); software used to prepare material for publication: JANA2006.

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811017193/hb5874sup1.cif

e-67-o1391-sup1.cif (15KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811017193/hb5874Isup2.hkl

e-67-o1391-Isup2.hkl (77.1KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
O4—H4o⋯N2 0.81 (2) 1.86 (2) 2.6051 (19) 154 (2)

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the Dirección de Investigaciones Sede Bogotá (DIB) of the Universidad Nacional de Colombia for financial support and the Institutional research plan No. AVOZ10100521 of the Institute of Physics and the Praemium Academiae project of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic.

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

Recently, we reported the synthesis of a new class of ligands by a ring-opening reduction of bis-1,3-benzoxazines with sodium borohydride (Rivera et al., 2010), and the products of these reactions are referred to as N,N'-disubstituted tetrahydro-salens (Atwood, 1997). Here we report the crystal structure of title compound (I). The C(sp3)—X bond distances and angles in (I) are within normal ranges (Allen et al., 1987) and comparable with a related structure (Nazarenko, et al., 2000). The C—N bonds in the N—CH2CH2—N segment are anti to each other, with a torsion angle of 180°. The observed conformation is stabilized by the short intramolecular hydrogen bonds O—H··· N (Table 1), and these interactions generate S(6) ring motifs.

Experimental

Sodium borohydride (3.0 mmol, 0.11 g) was added to a solution of 3,3'-ethylene-bis-(3,4-dihydro-6-bromo-2H-1,3-benzoxazine) (1 mmol) in ethanol (15 ml), and the mixture was stirred magnetically for 30 min at room temperature. After completion of the reaction, the mixture was poured into ice-cold water, neutralized with ammonium chloride (12 ml), and extracted with CHCl3 (3 times 10 cm3). The combined extracts were dried over anhydrous Na2SO4 and evaporated. The solid obtained was purified by recrystallization from ethanol to yield colourless needles of (I).

Refinement

All hydrogen atoms were discernible in difference Fourier maps and could be refined to reasonable geometry. According to common practice H atoms bonded C atoms were kept in ideal positions with C–H distance 0.96 Å during the refinement. The methyl H atoms were allowed to rotate freely about the adjacent C—C bonds. The hydroxy hydrogen was found in difference Fourier maps and its coordinates were refined freely. The isotropic atomic displacement parameters of hydrogen atoms were evaluated as 1.2×Ueq of the parent atom.

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

The molecule of the title compound. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at 50% probability level. Atoms with suffix i are generated by the symmetry operation (1–x, –y, 2–z).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

The packing for (I).

Crystal data

C18H22Br2N2O2 F(000) = 920
Mr = 458.2 Dx = 1.705 Mg m3
Orthorhombic, Pbca Cu Kα radiation, λ = 1.5418 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ac 2ab Cell parameters from 16599 reflections
a = 15.9282 (3) Å θ = 2.8–66.9°
b = 6.1123 (2) Å µ = 5.87 mm1
c = 18.3315 (4) Å T = 120 K
V = 1784.72 (8) Å3 Needle, colourless
Z = 4 0.36 × 0.06 × 0.05 mm

Data collection

Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur diffractometer with an Atlas (Gemini ultra Cu) detector 1591 independent reflections
Radiation source: Enhance Ultra (Cu) X-ray Source 1482 reflections with I > 3σ(I)
mirror Rint = 0.028
Detector resolution: 10.3784 pixels mm-1 θmax = 67.1°, θmin = 4.8°
Rotation method data acquisition using ω scans h = −18→18
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis PRO; Oxford Diffraction, 2009) k = −7→7
Tmin = 0.611, Tmax = 1 l = −21→21
24526 measured reflections

Refinement

Refinement on F2 41 constraints
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.021 H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.075 Weighting scheme based on measured s.u.'s w = 1/[σ2(I) + 0.0016I2]
S = 1.52 (Δ/σ)max = 0.008
1591 reflections Δρmax = 0.20 e Å3
112 parameters Δρmin = −0.32 e Å3
0 restraints

Special details

Experimental. CrysAlisPro, Oxford Diffraction (2009), Empirical absorption correction using spherical harmonics, implemented in SCALE3 ABSPACK scaling algorithm.
Refinement. The refinement was carried out against all reflections. The conventional R-factor is always based on F. The goodness of fit as well as the weighted R-factor are based on F and F2 for refinement carried out on F and F2, respectively. The threshold expression is used only for calculating R-factors etc. and it is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement.The program used for refinement, Jana2006, uses the weighting scheme based on the experimental expectations, see _refine_ls_weighting_details, that does not force S to be one. Therefore the values of S are usually larger than the ones from the SHELX program.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
Br1 0.640851 (13) 0.05571 (4) 0.580303 (11) 0.03125 (11)
O4 0.61560 (9) 0.4268 (2) 0.88393 (7) 0.0270 (4)
N2 0.58909 (9) 0.0319 (2) 0.93218 (8) 0.0195 (4)
C1 0.59115 (9) 0.1285 (3) 0.80150 (9) 0.0202 (4)
C2 0.62193 (10) 0.3384 (3) 0.81629 (9) 0.0214 (5)
C3 0.66038 (12) 0.4593 (3) 0.76131 (11) 0.0242 (5)
C4 0.66647 (10) 0.3757 (3) 0.69103 (9) 0.0251 (5)
C5 0.63443 (9) 0.1714 (3) 0.67664 (10) 0.0227 (5)
C6 0.59736 (10) 0.0460 (3) 0.73124 (10) 0.0217 (5)
C7 0.54916 (10) −0.0057 (3) 0.86063 (9) 0.0216 (4)
C8 0.53980 (10) −0.0646 (3) 0.99219 (9) 0.0218 (5)
C9 0.67487 (11) −0.0584 (3) 0.93342 (10) 0.0241 (5)
H3 0.682855 0.601479 0.77203 0.0291*
H4 0.692687 0.459508 0.65304 0.0301*
H6 0.576136 −0.09726 0.720273 0.026*
H7a 0.490778 0.032417 0.863354 0.0259*
H7b 0.552676 −0.158184 0.848428 0.0259*
H8a 0.573654 −0.070797 1.035465 0.0262*
H8b 0.525375 −0.212723 0.980158 0.0262*
H9a 0.701148 −0.023134 0.97905 0.0289*
H9b 0.672436 −0.214496 0.927867 0.0289*
H9c 0.706892 0.003417 0.894138 0.0289*
H4o 0.6031 (15) 0.326 (4) 0.9104 (12) 0.0323*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
Br1 0.03214 (19) 0.0431 (2) 0.01850 (19) 0.00457 (7) −0.00120 (6) −0.00091 (7)
O4 0.0343 (7) 0.0206 (6) 0.0260 (7) −0.0033 (5) 0.0042 (5) −0.0036 (5)
N2 0.0153 (7) 0.0236 (8) 0.0195 (7) −0.0017 (5) 0.0009 (5) 0.0002 (5)
C1 0.0144 (7) 0.0228 (8) 0.0235 (8) 0.0010 (6) −0.0004 (6) 0.0020 (7)
C2 0.0172 (7) 0.0228 (8) 0.0243 (8) 0.0015 (6) −0.0011 (6) 0.0006 (7)
C3 0.0210 (8) 0.0226 (9) 0.0291 (10) −0.0022 (6) −0.0008 (7) 0.0037 (6)
C4 0.0180 (8) 0.0298 (9) 0.0276 (9) −0.0002 (7) −0.0002 (6) 0.0075 (7)
C5 0.0181 (8) 0.0314 (10) 0.0185 (8) 0.0044 (6) −0.0013 (5) 0.0004 (7)
C6 0.0190 (8) 0.0228 (9) 0.0232 (9) 0.0018 (6) −0.0032 (6) 0.0008 (6)
C7 0.0194 (8) 0.0244 (8) 0.0210 (8) −0.0042 (7) −0.0012 (6) 0.0005 (7)
C8 0.0189 (8) 0.0251 (9) 0.0214 (8) −0.0012 (6) 0.0012 (6) 0.0036 (6)
C9 0.0163 (9) 0.0289 (10) 0.0271 (8) 0.0019 (6) 0.0000 (7) 0.0004 (6)

Geometric parameters (Å, °)

Br1—C5 1.9051 (18) C4—H4 0.96
O4—H4o 0.81 (2) C5—C6 1.392 (2)
N2—C7 1.476 (2) C6—H6 0.96
N2—C8 1.475 (2) C7—H7a 0.96
N2—C9 1.474 (2) C7—H7b 0.96
C1—C2 1.400 (2) C8—C8i 1.521 (2)
C1—C6 1.387 (2) C8—H8a 0.96
C1—C7 1.515 (2) C8—H8b 0.96
C2—C3 1.392 (3) C9—H9a 0.96
C3—C4 1.389 (3) C9—H9b 0.96
C3—H3 0.96 C9—H9c 0.96
C4—C5 1.375 (3)
C7—N2—C8 111.79 (13) N2—C7—C1 111.17 (13)
C7—N2—C9 110.78 (13) N2—C7—H7a 109.4713
C8—N2—C9 109.40 (13) N2—C7—H7b 109.4711
C2—C1—C6 119.21 (15) C1—C7—H7a 109.4712
C2—C1—C7 120.83 (14) C1—C7—H7b 109.4709
C6—C1—C7 119.93 (15) H7a—C7—H7b 107.7191
C1—C2—C3 120.04 (16) N2—C8—C8i 112.14 (13)
C2—C3—C4 120.46 (16) N2—C8—H8a 109.4713
C2—C3—H3 119.771 N2—C8—H8b 109.4716
C4—C3—H3 119.7725 C8i—C8—H8a 109.4716
C3—C4—C5 119.09 (16) C8i—C8—H8b 109.4707
C3—C4—H4 120.4567 H8a—C8—H8b 106.6664
C5—C4—H4 120.4562 N2—C9—H9a 109.4705
Br1—C5—C4 119.68 (13) N2—C9—H9b 109.471
Br1—C5—C6 119.00 (14) N2—C9—H9c 109.4718
C4—C5—C6 121.31 (16) H9a—C9—H9b 109.4713
C1—C6—C5 119.85 (16) H9a—C9—H9c 109.4714
C1—C6—H6 120.0729 H9b—C9—H9c 109.4713
C5—C6—H6 120.073
N2—C8—C8i—N2i 180

Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, −y, −z+2.

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
O4—H4o···N2 0.81 (2) 1.86 (2) 2.6051 (19) 154 (2)

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: HB5874).

References

  1. Allen, F. H., Kennard, O., Watson, D. G., Brammer, L., Orpen, A. G. & Taylor, R. (1987). J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2, pp. S1–19.
  2. Atwood, D. A. (1997). Coord. Chem. Rev. 165, 267–296.
  3. Brandenburg, K. & Putz, H. (2005). DIAMOND Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany.
  4. Burla, M. C., Camalli, M., Carrozzini, B., Cascarano, G. L., Giacovazzo, C., Polidori, G. & Spagna, R. (2003). J. Appl. Cryst. 36, 1103.
  5. Nazarenko, A. Y., Dalley, N. K., Pastushok, V. N. & Bradshaw, J. S. (2000). Private communication (refcode QEYGAC). CCDC, Cambridge, England.
  6. Oxford Diffraction (2009). CrysAlis PRO Oxford Diffraction Ltd, Yarnton, England.
  7. Petříček, V., Dušek, M. & Palatinus, L. (2006). JANA2006 Institute of Physics, Praha, Czech Republic.
  8. Rivera, A., Rojas, J. J., Salazar-Barrios, J., Maldonado, M. & Ríos-Motta, J. (2010). Molecules, 15, 4102–4110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811017193/hb5874sup1.cif

e-67-o1391-sup1.cif (15KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811017193/hb5874Isup2.hkl

e-67-o1391-Isup2.hkl (77.1KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES