Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2011 May 7;67(Pt 6):m714. doi: 10.1107/S160053681101659X

catena-Poly[[bis(pyridine)­lead(II)]bis(μ-penta­fluoro­benzene­thiol­ato)]

Sarah E Appleton a, Glen G Briand a,*, Andreas Decken b, Anita S Smith a
PMCID: PMC3120355  PMID: 21754614

Abstract

The title compound, [Pb(C6F5S)2(C5H5N)2]n, shows the PbII atom in a ψ-trigonal bipyramidal S2N2 bonding environment. Pyridine N atoms occupy axial sites, while thiol­ate S atoms and a stereochemically active lone pair occupy equatorial sites. Very long inter­molecular Pb⋯S inter­actions [3.618 (4) and 3.614 (4) Å] yield a weakly associated one-dimensional polymeric structure extending parallel to [010].

Related literature

Lead(II) thiol­ates tend to form polymeric structures in the solid state via inter­molecular Pb⋯S inter­actions, see: Davidovich et al. (2010) and references therein; Eichhöfer (2005). However, the bonding environment at lead and the degree of inter­molecular bonding may be altered via the introduction of Lewis base ligands that occupy metal coordination sites, see: Appleton et al. (2004); Briand et al. (2007). It has been shown that [(F5C6S)2Pb]n exhibits a three-dimensional framework structure containing hexa­coordinated PbII atoms (Fleischer et al., 2006). For van der Waals radii, see: Bondi (1964); Brown (1978). graphic file with name e-67-0m714-scheme1.jpg

Experimental

Crystal data

  • [Pb(C6F5S)2C5H5N)2]

  • M r = 763.63

  • Monoclinic, Inline graphic

  • a = 19.9288 (19) Å

  • b = 5.0416 (5) Å

  • c = 24.9155 (19) Å

  • β = 111.339 (3)°

  • V = 2331.7 (4) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 7.51 mm−1

  • T = 198 K

  • 0.57 × 0.15 × 0.10 mm

Data collection

  • Bruker SMART1000/P4 diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2008a ) T min = 0.099, T max = 0.521

  • 6756 measured reflections

  • 2575 independent reflections

  • 2421 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.055

Refinement

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.040

  • wR(F 2) = 0.097

  • S = 1.06

  • 2575 reflections

  • 168 parameters

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 3.83 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −2.71 e Å−3

Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 1999); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2006); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008b ); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008b ); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008b ); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL.

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S160053681101659X/hg5027sup1.cif

e-67-0m714-sup1.cif (15.6KB, cif)

Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S160053681101659X/hg5027Isup2.cdx

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S160053681101659X/hg5027Isup3.hkl

e-67-0m714-Isup3.hkl (126.6KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and Mount Allison University.

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

Lead(II) thiolates tend to form polymeric structures in the solid state via intermolecular Pb ··· S interactions (Davidovich et al., 2010, and references therein; Eichhöfer, 2005). However, the bonding environment at lead and the degree of intermolecular bonding may be altered via the introduction of Lewis base ligands that occupy metal coordination sites (Appleton et al., 2004; Briand et al., 2007). It has been shown that [(F5C6S)2Pb]n exhibits a three-dimensional layered structure containing hexacoordinated PbII atoms (Fleischer et al., 2006). The corresponding bis-pyridine adduct (I) (Fig. 1) shows Pb1 in a ψ -trigonal bipyramidal bonding environment, with two pyridine nitrogen atoms in trans axial sites [N1—Pb—N2 = 177.29 (17)°] and two sulfur atoms in cis equatorial sites [S1—Pb—S2 = 87.13 (6)°]. The remaining "open" equatorial site is presumably occupied by the stereochemically active lone pair of PbII. This is a similar bonding motif to that observed for (2,6-Me2C6H3S)2Pb × 2py (Appleton et al., 2004), but shows some subtle structural differences. The Pb—N bond distances in (I) [Pb—N1 = 2.643 (7), Pb—N2 = 2.637 (7) Å] are significantly shorter than those in (2,6-Me2C6H3S)2Pb × 2py [2.689 (3) and 2.695 (3) Å], while the Pb—S distances [Pb—S1 = 2.650 (2), Pb—S2 = 2.653 (2) Å] are significantly longer [2.6078 (9) and 2.6079 (9) Å for (2,6-Me2C6H3S)2Pb × 2py]. This may be rationalized by considering the increased electron withdrawing ability of the C6F5 group in (I) versus the 2,6-Me2C6H5 group in (2,6-Me2C6H3S)2Pb × 2py. The result is an effective increase in the Lewis acidity at the Pb centre, and shorter Pb—N Lewis acid-base bonding interactions. Very weak intermolecular Pb ··· S interactions [Pb—S1i = 3.618 (4), Pb—S2i = 3.614 (4) Å; (i) -1 + x, y, z; sum of van der Waals' radii = 3.8 Å] (Bondi, 1964; Brown, 1978) between adjacent molecules in (I) yield a one-dimensional polymeric structure (Fig. 2). These contacts are nearly trans to the short Pb—S bonds [S1—Pb—S2i = 166.75 (5)°, S2—Pb—S1i = 166.83 (5)°], yielding a distorted octahedral bonding arrangement at Pb. This weakly associated polymeric structure differs from that of (2,6-Me2C6H3S)2Pb × 2py, which is monomeric in the solid-state. Further, the structure possesses no intramolecular Pb ··· F contacts such as those observed in [(F5C6S)2Pb]n (Fleischer et al., 2006).

Experimental

Synthesis of (C6F5S)2Pb × 2py: A solution of pyridine (0.520 g, 6.57 mmol) in thf (3 ml) was added dropwise to a stirred solution of (C6F5S)2Pb (0.100 g, 0.165 mmol) in thf (5 ml) to give a cloudy pale green solution. The solution was stirred for 15 minutes and filtered. After 1 d at 25°C, colorless rod-like crystals of (I) were collected by suction filtration (0.100 g, 0.131 mmol, 79%). Anal. Calc. for C21H10F10N2PbS2: C, 34.60; H, 1.32; N, 3.67. Found: C, 34.47; H, 1.05; N, 3.64. Mp 262°C. See expt further details section for spectroscopic data.

Refinement

Hydrogen atoms were placed in calculated positions with C–H distances fixed at 0.93 Å and Uiso values = 1.2 Ueq of the carrier C atom.

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

X-ray crystal structure of (I), with displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level. H atoms have been omitted for clarity. Selected bond distances (Å) and angles (°): Pb—S(1) 2.650 (2), Pb—S(2) 2.653 (2), Pb—N(1) 2.643 (7), Pb—N(2) 2.637 (7), S(1)—Pb—S(2) 87.13 (6), S(1)—Pb—N(1) 91.44 (16), S(1)—Pb—N(2) 86.47 (15), S(2)—Pb—N(1) 86.69 (16), S(2)—Pb—N(2) 91.48 (16), N(1)—Pb—N(2) 177.29 (17).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

X-ray crystal structure of (I) showing the polymeric structure, with displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level. All hydrogen atoms and C6F5 group carbon atoms (except α-carbon) have been omitted for clarity. Symmetry transformations used to generate equivalent atoms: (i) -1 + x, y, z; (ii) +1 + x, y, z.

Crystal data

[Pb(C6F5S)2C5H5N)2] F(000) = 1440
Mr = 763.63 Dx = 2.175 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/c Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -C 2yc Cell parameters from 5261 reflections
a = 19.9288 (19) Å θ = 2.2–27.9°
b = 5.0416 (5) Å µ = 7.51 mm1
c = 24.9155 (19) Å T = 198 K
β = 111.339 (3)° Parallelepiped, colourless
V = 2331.7 (4) Å3 0.57 × 0.15 × 0.10 mm
Z = 4

Data collection

Bruker SMART1000/P4 diffractometer 2575 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube, K760 2421 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphite Rint = 0.055
φ and ω scans θmax = 27.5°, θmin = 4.2°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2008a) h = −25→25
Tmin = 0.099, Tmax = 0.521 k = −6→6
6756 measured reflections l = −30→32

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: full Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.040 Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.097 H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.06 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0608P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2575 reflections (Δ/σ)max = 0.001
168 parameters Δρmax = 3.83 e Å3
0 restraints Δρmin = −2.70 e Å3

Special details

Experimental. Crystal decay was monitored by repeating the initial 50 frames at the end of the data collection and analyzing duplicate reflections.FT—IR (cm-1): 669 w, 702 m, 750 m, 825 vw, 856 s, 972 s, 1001 m, 1153 w, 1215 w, 1263 vw, 1444 s, 1477 versus, 1510 s, 1595 m, 1608 vw, 2341 m, 2360 s. FT-Raman (cm-1): 74 s, 101 versus, 175 vw, 201 vw, 268 versus, 317 vw, 372 vw, 387 w, 444 vw, 513 m, 584 w, 859 m, 1003 s, 1032 m, 1277 vw, 1393 m, 1636 versus, 3069 m. NMR data (thf-d8, p.p.m.): 1H NMR, δ = 7.36 (m, 4H, NC5H5), 7.77 (tt, 2H, 3J (1H-1H) = 8 Hz, 4J (1H-1H) = 2 Hz, NC5H5), 8.67 (m, 4H, NC5H5); 13C{1H} NMR, δ = 115.8 (tm, 2J (13C-19F) = 22 Hz, SC6F5), 124.2 (s, NC5H5), 136.7 (s, NC5H5), 137.1 (dm, 1J (13C-19F) = 245 Hz, SC6F5), 137.7 (dm, 1J (13C-19F) = 247 Hz, SC6F5), 148.4 (dm, 1J (13C-19F) = 226 Hz, SC6F5), 149.4 (s, NC5H5); 19F NMR, δ = -166.2 (m, SC6F5), -164.5 (m, SC6F5), -133.9 (m, SC6F5).
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
Pb 0.0000 0.57741 (4) 0.2500 0.02457 (12)
S1 −0.00240 (9) 0.9584 (2) 0.17593 (6) 0.0308 (3)
F2 −0.1488 (2) 0.9328 (7) 0.0811 (2) 0.0491 (11)
F3 −0.1937 (2) 0.5959 (8) −0.0085 (2) 0.0643 (15)
F4 −0.1038 (2) 0.2260 (7) −0.02233 (17) 0.0513 (10)
F5 0.03376 (19) 0.1979 (7) 0.05311 (15) 0.0416 (8)
F6 0.0806 (2) 0.5350 (7) 0.14221 (17) 0.0404 (8)
N1 0.1419 (3) 0.5895 (8) 0.2954 (3) 0.0333 (11)
C1 −0.0321 (3) 0.7450 (9) 0.1159 (2) 0.0261 (10)
C2 −0.1022 (3) 0.7539 (11) 0.0757 (2) 0.0324 (11)
C3 −0.1263 (4) 0.5816 (11) 0.0295 (3) 0.0369 (14)
C4 −0.0802 (4) 0.3944 (11) 0.0226 (3) 0.0341 (13)
C5 −0.0113 (3) 0.3793 (11) 0.0607 (3) 0.0304 (12)
C6 0.0123 (3) 0.5558 (9) 0.1063 (3) 0.0278 (11)
C7 0.1855 (3) 0.7571 (12) 0.2823 (3) 0.0408 (13)
H7 0.1652 0.8817 0.2534 0.049*
C8 0.2590 (4) 0.7531 (14) 0.3097 (3) 0.0512 (17)
H8 0.2880 0.8719 0.2994 0.061*
C9 0.2891 (4) 0.5700 (12) 0.3528 (4) 0.052 (2)
H9 0.3387 0.5646 0.3726 0.062*
C10 0.2453 (4) 0.3984 (13) 0.3659 (4) 0.053 (2)
H10 0.2645 0.2719 0.3946 0.063*
C11 0.1719 (4) 0.4119 (11) 0.3363 (3) 0.0426 (16)
H11 0.1423 0.2918 0.3455 0.051*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
Pb 0.02186 (16) 0.02276 (15) 0.02304 (18) 0.000 0.00096 (12) 0.000
S1 0.0382 (8) 0.0238 (6) 0.0243 (7) −0.0012 (5) 0.0040 (6) −0.0011 (5)
F2 0.036 (2) 0.054 (2) 0.045 (3) 0.0214 (16) 0.0000 (19) −0.0131 (16)
F3 0.031 (2) 0.089 (3) 0.052 (3) 0.0185 (19) −0.011 (2) −0.030 (2)
F4 0.046 (2) 0.055 (2) 0.042 (2) 0.0075 (18) 0.0033 (18) −0.0236 (18)
F5 0.0405 (19) 0.0421 (18) 0.042 (2) 0.0155 (16) 0.0150 (17) −0.0039 (15)
F6 0.0235 (17) 0.050 (2) 0.038 (2) 0.0079 (15) −0.0006 (16) −0.0015 (16)
N1 0.022 (2) 0.034 (2) 0.037 (3) 0.0008 (17) 0.003 (2) 0.0018 (18)
C1 0.029 (2) 0.023 (2) 0.023 (3) 0.001 (2) 0.006 (2) 0.0051 (19)
C2 0.028 (2) 0.037 (3) 0.029 (3) 0.010 (2) 0.006 (2) −0.004 (2)
C3 0.027 (3) 0.045 (3) 0.029 (3) 0.007 (2) −0.002 (3) −0.008 (2)
C4 0.034 (3) 0.038 (3) 0.027 (3) 0.003 (2) 0.008 (3) −0.008 (2)
C5 0.031 (3) 0.032 (2) 0.029 (3) 0.010 (2) 0.012 (3) 0.001 (2)
C6 0.023 (3) 0.030 (3) 0.026 (3) 0.0005 (19) 0.004 (2) 0.0038 (19)
C7 0.033 (3) 0.040 (3) 0.041 (4) −0.003 (3) 0.005 (3) 0.006 (3)
C8 0.033 (3) 0.054 (4) 0.061 (5) −0.013 (3) 0.010 (3) 0.003 (3)
C9 0.027 (3) 0.056 (4) 0.061 (5) −0.001 (3) 0.003 (3) −0.001 (3)
C10 0.039 (4) 0.049 (4) 0.051 (5) 0.005 (3) −0.005 (4) 0.009 (3)
C11 0.032 (3) 0.040 (3) 0.047 (4) −0.002 (2) 0.005 (3) 0.010 (2)

Geometric parameters (Å, °)

Pb—N1 2.636 (5) C2—C3 1.382 (8)
Pb—N1i 2.636 (5) C3—C4 1.371 (8)
Pb—S1i 2.6519 (14) C4—C5 1.359 (9)
Pb—S1 2.6519 (14) C5—C6 1.384 (8)
S1—C1 1.761 (5) C7—C8 1.373 (8)
F2—C2 1.336 (6) C7—H7 0.9300
F3—C3 1.334 (8) C8—C9 1.378 (11)
F4—C4 1.345 (7) C8—H8 0.9300
F5—C5 1.342 (6) C9—C10 1.350 (12)
F6—C6 1.334 (7) C9—H9 0.9300
N1—C11 1.326 (8) C10—C11 1.380 (10)
N1—C7 1.335 (8) C10—H10 0.9300
C1—C6 1.379 (8) C11—H11 0.9300
C1—C2 1.392 (7)
N1—Pb—N1i 177.34 (18) F5—C5—C4 119.8 (5)
N1—Pb—S1i 86.55 (12) F5—C5—C6 120.7 (5)
N1i—Pb—S1i 91.52 (12) C4—C5—C6 119.5 (5)
N1—Pb—S1 91.52 (12) F6—C6—C1 120.1 (5)
N1i—Pb—S1 86.55 (12) F6—C6—C5 117.3 (5)
S1i—Pb—S1 87.18 (6) C1—C6—C5 122.7 (5)
C1—S1—Pb 93.67 (16) N1—C7—C8 122.8 (6)
C11—N1—C7 117.6 (6) N1—C7—H7 118.6
C11—N1—Pb 115.3 (4) C8—C7—H7 118.6
C7—N1—Pb 127.0 (4) C7—C8—C9 118.7 (7)
C6—C1—C2 115.9 (5) C7—C8—H8 120.6
C6—C1—S1 122.1 (4) C9—C8—H8 120.6
C2—C1—S1 122.0 (4) C10—C9—C8 118.7 (7)
F2—C2—C3 117.8 (5) C10—C9—H9 120.6
F2—C2—C1 120.1 (5) C8—C9—H9 120.6
C3—C2—C1 122.1 (5) C9—C10—C11 119.6 (7)
F3—C3—C4 119.8 (5) C9—C10—H10 120.2
F3—C3—C2 120.7 (5) C11—C10—H10 120.2
C4—C3—C2 119.5 (6) N1—C11—C10 122.5 (7)
F4—C4—C5 120.3 (5) N1—C11—H11 118.7
F4—C4—C3 119.4 (6) C10—C11—H11 118.7
C5—C4—C3 120.3 (5)

Symmetry codes: (i) −x, y, −z+1/2.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: HG5027).

References

  1. Appleton, S. E., Briand, G. G., Decken, A. & Smith, A. S. (2004). Dalton Trans. pp. 3515–3520. [DOI] [PubMed]
  2. Bondi, A. (1964). J. Phys. Chem. 68, 441–451.
  3. Briand, G. G., Smith, A. D., Schatte, G., Rossini, A. J. & Schurko, R. W. (2007). Inorg. Chem. 46, 8625–8637. [DOI] [PubMed]
  4. Brown, I. D. (1978). Chem. Soc. Rev. 7, 359–376.
  5. Bruker (1999). SMART Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  6. Bruker (2006). SAINT Bruker AXS inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  7. Davidovich, R. L., Stavila, V. & Whitmire, K. H. (2010). Chem. Rev. 254, 2193–2226.
  8. Eichhöfer, A. (2005). Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. pp. 1683–1688.
  9. Fleischer, H., Heller, C. & Schollmeyer, D. (2006). Acta Cryst. E62, m1365–m1367.
  10. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008a). SADABS Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  11. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008b). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S160053681101659X/hg5027sup1.cif

e-67-0m714-sup1.cif (15.6KB, cif)

Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S160053681101659X/hg5027Isup2.cdx

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S160053681101659X/hg5027Isup3.hkl

e-67-0m714-Isup3.hkl (126.6KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES