Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2011 May 28;67(Pt 6):o1554. doi: 10.1107/S1600536811018575

5-(1H-Tetra­zol-5-yl)-1H-indole monohydrate

Xing-Wei Cai a,*, Hong-Fei Lu a, Zhen Zhou b
PMCID: PMC3120397  PMID: 21754912

Abstract

In the title compound, C9H7N5·H2O, the inter­planar angles between the benzene and tetra­zole rings and between the benzene and imidazole rings are 8.71 (3) and 1.32 (2)°, respectively. In the crystal, strong N—H⋯N hydrogen bonds link the organic 5-(1H-tetra­zol-5-yl)-1H-indole mol­ecules into chains extended along the b axis. The chains are further inter­connected into layers parallel to (100) via strong O—H⋯N and N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds. Furthermore, the layers are inter­connected via strong O—H⋯N hydrogen bonds. Moreover, cohesion between the layers is provided by the π–π inter­actions between the imidazole, tetra­zole and benzene rings with centroid–centroid distances of 3.766 (2), 3.832 (2) and 3.733 (2) Å.

Related literature

For applications of tetra­zole derivatives, see: Jin et al. (1994 ▶); Fu et al. (2009 ▶). For their use in the synthesis of metal-organic frameworks, see: Brewis et al. (2003 ▶). For related structures, see: Zhao et al. (2008 ▶); Fu et al. (2009 ▶). For the classification of hydrogen bonds, see: Desiraju & Steiner (1999 ▶).graphic file with name e-67-o1554-scheme1.jpg

Experimental

Crystal data

  • C9H7N5·H2O

  • M r = 203.21

  • Orthorhombic, Inline graphic

  • a = 6.8978 (14) Å

  • b = 9.953 (2) Å

  • c = 13.713 (3) Å

  • V = 941.4 (3) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 0.10 mm−1

  • T = 298 K

  • 0.40 × 0.30 × 0.20 mm

Data collection

  • Rigaku Mercury2 diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2005 ▶) T min = 0.89, T max = 0.95

  • 9741 measured reflections

  • 1258 independent reflections

  • 971 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.069

Refinement

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.045

  • wR(F 2) = 0.105

  • S = 1.06

  • 1258 reflections

  • 148 parameters

  • 3 restraints

  • H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement

  • Δρmax = 0.19 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.15 e Å−3

Data collection: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2005 ▶); cell refinement: CrystalClear; data reduction: CrystalClear; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL.

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811018575/fb2235sup1.cif

e-67-o1554-sup1.cif (14.5KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811018575/fb2235Isup2.hkl

e-67-o1554-Isup2.hkl (62.2KB, hkl)

Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811018575/fb2235Isup3.cml

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A D⋯A D—H⋯A
N1—H1⋯N3i 0.87 (3) 2.18 (3) 3.042 (3) 171 (3)
O1W—H1WA⋯N2ii 0.80 (2) 2.08 (2) 2.869 (3) 173 (3)
O1W—H1WB⋯N4iii 0.79 (2) 2.33 (2) 3.098 (3) 164 (3)
N5—H5⋯O1W 0.91 (3) 1.85 (3) 2.757 (3) 173 (3)

Symmetry codes: (i) Inline graphic; (ii) Inline graphic; (iii) Inline graphic.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a start-up grant from Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, China.

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

The tetrazole functional derivatives have found a wide range of applications in coordination chemistry as ligands (Fu et al., 2009), in medicinal chemistry as metabolically stable surrogates for the carboxylic acid group (Fu et al., 2009) and in materials science as highly energetical materials for production of tetrazole explosives (Jin et al., 1994). For the varying ability of the tetrazoles to coordinate metal ions, a large number of novel metal-organic frameworks have been synthesized (Brewis et al., 2003). As extension of these works, we report here the crystal structure of the title compound, 5-(1H-tetrazol-5-yl)-1H-indole hydrate.

The interplanar angles between the benzene and the tetrazole and the benzene and imidazole rings equal to 8.71 (3)° and 1.32 (2)°, respectively. The geometric parameters of the tetrazole ring are comparable to those in the related molecules (Zhao et al., 2008; Fu et al., 2009).

The molecular packing is stabilized by strong intermolecular N—H···O, N—H···N and O—H···N hydrogen bonds (the classification of the hydrogen bonds is according to Desiraju & Steiner, 1999). The H-bonds link the molecules into a three-dimensional network (Fig. 2 and Tab. 1). In a more detail, N1-H1···N3 connects the molecules into chains extended along the b-axis. These chains are interconnected by the hydrogen bonds O1W—H1WA···N2 and N5—H5···O1W, forming thus layers parallel to (1 0 0) - see Fig. 2 and Tab. 1. The hydrogen bond O1W—H1WB···N4 interconnects the layers.

The layers are also connected by the π-electron ring··· π-electron ring interactions. The centroid—centroid distances are Cg1—Cg2 (1 + x, y, z) = 3.766 (2) Å; Cg1—Cg2 (1/2 + x, 3/2 - y, 1 - z) = 3.832 (2)Å and Cg3—Cg3 (1/2 + x, 3/2 - y or -1/2 + x, 3/2 - y, 1 - z) = 3.733 (2) Å , where Cg1, Cg2 and Cg3 are the centroids referring to the imidazole, tetrazole and the benzene rings, respectively.

Experimental

5-(1H-tetrazol-5-yl)-1H-indole was obtained commercially from Alfa Aesar. Colourless block-shaped crystals suitable for X-ray analysis were obtained by slow evaporation of an ethanol/water (2:1 v/v) solution.

Refinement

All the H atoms were discernible in the difference electron density maps. All the H atoms attached to the C atoms were situated into the idealized positions and treated as riding with C–H = 0.93 Å with Uiso(H)=1.2Ueq(C). The positional parameters of the H atoms involved in the hydrogen bonds were refined either freely (N1, N5) or as restrained (Ow). The restraints regarded the distances between the water oxygens and the water hydrogens (0.82 (2)Å) while the H1WA—O1w—H1WB angle was set to 105(1.5)°. The constraints regarding the displacement parameters of the amine and water hydrogens: Uiso(H)=1.2Ueq(N); Uiso(H)=1.5Ueq(Ow). Since there has been no significant anomalous scatterer in the structure, 889 Friedel pairs have been merged.

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

A view of the title molecules with the atomic numbering scheme. The displacement ellipsoids were drawn at the 30% probability level.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

One layer with the atoms with the fractional coordinates of the constituting atoms x < 0.5. The H atoms not involved in the hydrogen bonding (dashed lines) have been omitted for clarity.

Crystal data

C9H7N5·H2O F(000) = 424
Mr = 203.21 Dx = 1.434 Mg m−3
Orthorhombic, P212121 Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: P 2ac 2ab Cell parameters from 1258 reflections
a = 6.8978 (14) Å θ = 3.3–27.5°
b = 9.953 (2) Å µ = 0.10 mm−1
c = 13.713 (3) Å T = 298 K
V = 941.4 (3) Å3 Block, colourless
Z = 4 0.40 × 0.30 × 0.20 mm

Data collection

Rigaku Mercury2 diffractometer 1258 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube 971 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphite Rint = 0.069
Detector resolution: 13.6612 pixels mm-1 θmax = 27.5°, θmin = 3.3°
φ scans h = −8→8
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2005) k = −12→12
Tmin = 0.89, Tmax = 0.95 l = −17→17
9741 measured reflections

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: full Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.045 Hydrogen site location: difference Fourier map
wR(F2) = 0.105 H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.06 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0556P)2 + 0.0295P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1258 reflections (Δ/σ)max < 0.001
148 parameters Δρmax = 0.19 e Å−3
3 restraints Δρmin = −0.15 e Å−3
24 constraints

Special details

Experimental. The distance between the sample and the detector is 55 mm.
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
N1 0.1423 (4) 1.0672 (2) 0.40317 (17) 0.0433 (6)
H1 0.144 (5) 1.145 (3) 0.433 (2) 0.052*
N5 0.1331 (4) 0.4891 (2) 0.61965 (15) 0.0371 (5)
H5 0.120 (4) 0.532 (3) 0.6781 (19) 0.045*
C2 0.1601 (4) 0.6777 (2) 0.49991 (17) 0.0296 (6)
C3 0.1565 (4) 0.7101 (2) 0.40154 (17) 0.0339 (6)
H3 0.1578 0.6428 0.3545 0.041*
C7 0.1607 (4) 0.7798 (3) 0.57174 (18) 0.0357 (6)
H7 0.1637 0.7561 0.6373 0.043*
N4 0.1313 (4) 0.3538 (2) 0.61809 (16) 0.0456 (6)
C5 0.1512 (4) 0.9450 (2) 0.44822 (18) 0.0339 (6)
N3 0.1556 (4) 0.3203 (2) 0.52735 (17) 0.0471 (6)
C8 0.1406 (5) 0.9156 (3) 0.28329 (19) 0.0441 (7)
H8 0.1375 0.8770 0.2215 0.053*
C1 0.1569 (4) 0.5364 (2) 0.52883 (18) 0.0308 (6)
C4 0.1510 (4) 0.8459 (2) 0.37392 (18) 0.0334 (6)
C6 0.1569 (4) 0.9126 (2) 0.54653 (18) 0.0362 (6)
H6 0.1582 0.9794 0.5940 0.043*
C9 0.1359 (5) 1.0484 (3) 0.3040 (2) 0.0471 (7)
H9 0.1294 1.1169 0.2579 0.056*
N2 0.1706 (4) 0.4307 (2) 0.47002 (16) 0.0421 (6)
O1W 0.1242 (4) 0.6288 (2) 0.79322 (13) 0.0541 (6)
H1WA 0.183 (4) 0.606 (3) 0.8404 (19) 0.081*
H1WB 0.045 (4) 0.683 (3) 0.806 (2) 0.081*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
N1 0.0523 (14) 0.0299 (11) 0.0477 (14) −0.0015 (15) 0.0014 (13) −0.0001 (10)
N5 0.0484 (14) 0.0301 (11) 0.0328 (12) −0.0004 (11) 0.0015 (13) −0.0005 (10)
C2 0.0271 (13) 0.0275 (12) 0.0344 (13) −0.0007 (13) 0.0031 (13) −0.0015 (9)
C3 0.0377 (14) 0.0327 (13) 0.0312 (13) −0.0018 (14) −0.0009 (13) −0.0034 (11)
C7 0.0409 (15) 0.0368 (14) 0.0292 (12) −0.0006 (15) 0.0005 (13) −0.0012 (11)
N4 0.0628 (15) 0.0275 (12) 0.0466 (14) 0.0006 (13) 0.0021 (15) 0.0031 (10)
C5 0.0290 (12) 0.0279 (12) 0.0447 (15) 0.0000 (14) 0.0015 (12) −0.0013 (11)
N3 0.0662 (16) 0.0301 (12) 0.0450 (14) −0.0044 (14) 0.0075 (15) −0.0014 (10)
C8 0.0552 (18) 0.0421 (17) 0.0349 (15) −0.0046 (16) −0.0009 (15) 0.0029 (12)
C1 0.0299 (13) 0.0295 (13) 0.0331 (13) −0.0031 (13) 0.0006 (13) −0.0035 (11)
C4 0.0289 (12) 0.0355 (14) 0.0359 (14) −0.0013 (13) 0.0009 (14) −0.0039 (11)
C6 0.0449 (15) 0.0298 (14) 0.0338 (14) 0.0019 (14) −0.0015 (14) −0.0079 (10)
C9 0.0540 (18) 0.0397 (15) 0.0475 (17) 0.0002 (18) 0.0029 (16) 0.0124 (13)
N2 0.0601 (16) 0.0291 (11) 0.0370 (12) −0.0023 (13) 0.0048 (12) −0.0025 (10)
O1W 0.0737 (17) 0.0559 (14) 0.0327 (10) 0.0169 (13) −0.0053 (11) −0.0024 (10)

Geometric parameters (Å, °)

N1—C5 1.366 (3) N4—N3 1.299 (3)
N1—C9 1.373 (3) C5—C6 1.387 (4)
N1—H1 0.87 (3) C5—C4 1.418 (3)
N5—C1 1.341 (3) N3—N2 1.354 (3)
N5—N4 1.347 (3) C8—C9 1.353 (4)
N5—H5 0.91 (3) C8—C4 1.425 (4)
C2—C3 1.387 (3) C8—H8 0.9300
C2—C7 1.415 (3) C1—N2 1.329 (3)
C2—C1 1.462 (3) C6—H6 0.9300
C3—C4 1.403 (3) C9—H9 0.9300
C3—H3 0.9300 O1W—H1WA 0.797 (17)
C7—C6 1.367 (3) O1W—H1WB 0.792 (17)
C7—H7 0.9300
C5—N1—C9 109.1 (2) N4—N3—N2 111.0 (2)
C5—N1—H1 125.4 (19) C9—C8—C4 107.1 (2)
C9—N1—H1 125.5 (19) C9—C8—H8 126.5
C1—N5—N4 109.7 (2) C4—C8—H8 126.5
C1—N5—H5 131.5 (18) N2—C1—N5 107.1 (2)
N4—N5—H5 118.9 (18) N2—C1—C2 126.6 (2)
C3—C2—C7 120.7 (2) N5—C1—C2 126.2 (2)
C3—C2—C1 119.2 (2) C3—C4—C5 118.4 (2)
C7—C2—C1 120.1 (2) C3—C4—C8 134.8 (2)
C2—C3—C4 119.1 (2) C5—C4—C8 106.7 (2)
C2—C3—H3 120.4 C7—C6—C5 118.1 (2)
C4—C3—H3 120.4 C7—C6—H6 120.9
C6—C7—C2 121.2 (2) C5—C6—H6 120.9
C6—C7—H7 119.4 C8—C9—N1 109.9 (2)
C2—C7—H7 119.4 C8—C9—H9 125.1
N3—N4—N5 105.7 (2) N1—C9—H9 125.1
N1—C5—C6 130.4 (2) C1—N2—N3 106.5 (2)
N1—C5—C4 107.1 (2) H1WA—O1W—H1WB 111 (2)
C6—C5—C4 122.5 (2)

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
N1—H1···N3i 0.87 (3) 2.18 (3) 3.042 (3) 171 (3)
O1W—H1WA···N2ii 0.80 (2) 2.08 (2) 2.869 (3) 173 (3)
O1W—H1WB···N4iii 0.79 (2) 2.33 (2) 3.098 (3) 164 (3)
N5—H5···O1W 0.91 (3) 1.85 (3) 2.757 (3) 173 (3)

Symmetry codes: (i) x, y+1, z; (ii) −x+1/2, −y+1, z+1/2; (iii) −x, y+1/2, −z+3/2.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: FB2235).

References

  1. Brewis, M., Helliwell, M. & McKeown, N. B. (2003). Tetrahedron, 59, 3863–3872.
  2. Desiraju, G. R. & Steiner, T. (1999). The Weak Hydrogen Bond in Structural Chemistry and Biology, p. 13. New York: Oxford University Press Inc.
  3. Fu, D.-W., Ge, J.-Z., Dai, J., Ye, H.-Y. & Qu, Z.-R. (2009). Inorg. Chem. Commun. 12, 994–997.
  4. Jin, Z., Nolan, K., McArthur, C. R., Lever, A. B. P. & Leznoff, C. C. (1994). J. Organomet. Chem. 468, 205–212.
  5. Rigaku (2005). CrystalClear Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.
  6. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  7. Zhao, H., Qu, Z.-R., Ye, H.-Y. & Xiong, R.-G. (2008). Chem. Soc. Rev. 37, 84-100. [DOI] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811018575/fb2235sup1.cif

e-67-o1554-sup1.cif (14.5KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811018575/fb2235Isup2.hkl

e-67-o1554-Isup2.hkl (62.2KB, hkl)

Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811018575/fb2235Isup3.cml

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES