Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2011 May 28;67(Pt 6):o1555. doi: 10.1107/S1600536811019799

Isonicotinonitrile–4-methyl­benzoic acid (1/1)

Xing-Wei Cai a,*, Hong-Fei Lu a
PMCID: PMC3120448  PMID: 21754913

Abstract

The title structure, C6H4N2·C8H8O2, is built up from an assembly of isonicotinonitrile and 4-methyl­benzoic acid mol­ecules and may be regarded as a co-crystal. The two planar mol­ecules [r.m.s. deviations of 0.002 (6) and 0.0028 (11) Å, respectively] are linked by O—H⋯N and C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds. They are nearly coplanar and only twisted from each other by a dihedral angle of 2.48 (6)°. In the crystal, the components are inter­connected by slipped π–π stacking [centroid–centroid distance = 3.6797 (11), slippage = 1.304 Å] and inter­molecular C—H⋯N inter­actions.

Related literature

For the structures of related derivatives, see: Fu et al. (2009); Aminabhavi et al. (1986); Dai & Fu (2008a ,b ). For the graph-set theory, see: Etter et al. (1990); Bernstein et al. (1995).graphic file with name e-67-o1555-scheme1.jpg

Experimental

Crystal data

  • C6H4N2·C8H8O2

  • M r = 240.26

  • Monoclinic, Inline graphic

  • a = 7.5368 (15) Å

  • b = 13.049 (3) Å

  • c = 24.749 (5) Å

  • β = 94.20 (3)°

  • V = 2427.5 (8) Å3

  • Z = 8

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 0.09 mm−1

  • T = 298 K

  • 0.40 × 0.30 × 0.20 mm

Data collection

  • Rigaku Mercury2 diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2005) T min = 0.89, T max = 1.00

  • 11659 measured reflections

  • 2752 independent reflections

  • 2416 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.033

Refinement

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.041

  • wR(F 2) = 0.124

  • S = 1.09

  • 2752 reflections

  • 165 parameters

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 0.28 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.18 e Å−3

Data collection: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2005); cell refinement: CrystalClear; data reduction: CrystalClear; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: ORTEPIII (Burnett & Johnson, 1996) and ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811019799/dn2689sup1.cif

e-67-o1555-sup1.cif (20.1KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811019799/dn2689Isup2.hkl

e-67-o1555-Isup2.hkl (132.5KB, hkl)

Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811019799/dn2689Isup3.cml

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
O1—H1⋯N1 0.82 1.87 2.6850 (15) 175
C1—H1A⋯O2 0.93 2.51 3.1858 (18) 130
C4—H4A⋯N2i 0.93 2.60 3.3700 (18) 141

Symmetry code: (i) Inline graphic.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a start-up grant from Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, China.

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

The amino derivatives have found wide range of applications in material science, such as magnetic, fluorescent and dielectric behaviors. And there has been an increased interest in the preparation of amino co-crystal compounds (Aminabhavi et al., 1986; Dai & Fu 2008a; Dai & Fu 2008b; Fu, et al. 2009). As an extension on the structural characterization, we report here the crystal structure of the title compound isonicotinonitrile 4-methylbenzoic acid.

The asymmetric unit contains an organic isonicotinonitrile molecule and a 4-methylbenzoic acid organic molecule which are linked by a strong O—H···N and a weak C-H···O hydrogen bonds forming a C22(7) ring ( Etter et al., 1990; Bernstein et al., 1995)(Fig. 1). The benzene and pyridine rings are nearly coplanar and only twisted from each other by a dihedral angle of 2.48 (6)°. The geometric parameters of both the organic molecules are within the normal range.

There are intramolecular C-H···N hydrogen bonds and slippest π-π stacking which stabilize the packing (Tab.1 & 2).

Experimental

isonicotinonitrile and 4-methylbenzoic acid were obtained commercially from Alfa Aesar. The two organoc compounds were solved in the solution (ethanol/water). Colourless block-shaped crystals suitable for X-ray analysis were obtained by slow evaporation of an ethanol/water (2:1 v/v) solution.

Refinement

All the H atoms attached to C atoms were located into the idealized positions and treated as riding with C–H = 0.93 Å (aromatic) and 0.96 Å (methyl) with Uiso(H)=1.2Ueq(aromatic) and Uiso(H)=1.5Ueq(methyl). The positional parameters of the H atom (O1) was refined freely. In the last cycles of the refinement, it was treated as riding with the H1—O1 = 0.82 (2)Å) and Uiso(H)=1.5Ueq(O).

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

A view of the asymmetric unit with the atomic numbering scheme. The displacement ellipsoids were drawn at the 30% probability level. H atoms are represented as small spheres of arbitrary radii and the H bonds are shown as dashed lines.

Crystal data

C6H4N2·C8H8O2 F(000) = 1008
Mr = 240.26 Dx = 1.315 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/c Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -C 2yc Cell parameters from 3221 reflections
a = 7.5368 (15) Å θ = 3.1–27.5°
b = 13.049 (3) Å µ = 0.09 mm1
c = 24.749 (5) Å T = 298 K
β = 94.20 (3)° Block, colourless
V = 2427.5 (8) Å3 0.40 × 0.30 × 0.20 mm
Z = 8

Data collection

Rigaku Mercury2 diffractometer 2752 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube 2416 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphite Rint = 0.033
Detector resolution: 13.6612 pixels mm-1 θmax = 27.5°, θmin = 1.7°
profile data from φ scans h = −9→9
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2005) k = −16→16
Tmin = 0.89, Tmax = 1.00 l = −32→32
11659 measured reflections

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: full Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.041 Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.124 H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.09 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0713P)2 + 0.8361P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2752 reflections (Δ/σ)max = 0.001
165 parameters Δρmax = 0.28 e Å3
0 restraints Δρmin = −0.18 e Å3

Special details

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2sigma(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
N1 0.43937 (13) 0.09948 (8) 0.42051 (4) 0.0221 (2)
N2 −0.17678 (14) 0.10802 (9) 0.29801 (4) 0.0277 (3)
C1 0.28921 (16) 0.13083 (9) 0.44087 (5) 0.0230 (3)
H1A 0.2943 0.1523 0.4768 0.028*
C2 0.12616 (16) 0.13288 (9) 0.41101 (5) 0.0234 (3)
H2A 0.0238 0.1547 0.4264 0.028*
C3 0.12108 (15) 0.10120 (8) 0.35729 (5) 0.0197 (3)
C4 0.27629 (16) 0.06891 (10) 0.33537 (5) 0.0246 (3)
H4A 0.2754 0.0473 0.2995 0.030*
C5 0.43222 (16) 0.06995 (10) 0.36861 (5) 0.0256 (3)
H5A 0.5369 0.0491 0.3542 0.031*
C6 −0.04509 (16) 0.10367 (9) 0.32417 (5) 0.0224 (3)
O1 0.73800 (11) 0.10321 (7) 0.48667 (3) 0.0269 (2)
H1 0.6481 0.1058 0.4659 0.040*
O2 0.55361 (11) 0.16298 (7) 0.54594 (4) 0.0289 (2)
C7 1.30335 (18) 0.15462 (10) 0.69515 (5) 0.0299 (3)
H7A 1.4122 0.1618 0.6776 0.045*
H7B 1.3066 0.0923 0.7158 0.045*
H7C 1.2898 0.2118 0.7189 0.045*
C8 1.14836 (17) 0.15140 (9) 0.65291 (5) 0.0234 (3)
C9 1.16972 (16) 0.11425 (9) 0.60095 (5) 0.0244 (3)
H9A 1.2815 0.0926 0.5920 0.029*
C10 1.02690 (16) 0.10904 (9) 0.56240 (5) 0.0227 (3)
H10A 1.0432 0.0835 0.5280 0.027*
C11 0.85908 (15) 0.14193 (8) 0.57500 (5) 0.0195 (3)
C12 0.83696 (17) 0.17952 (9) 0.62657 (5) 0.0248 (3)
H12A 0.7254 0.2016 0.6354 0.030*
C13 0.98023 (18) 0.18425 (10) 0.66492 (5) 0.0272 (3)
H13A 0.9636 0.2098 0.6993 0.033*
C14 0.70140 (15) 0.13749 (9) 0.53480 (5) 0.0203 (3)

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
N1 0.0212 (5) 0.0233 (5) 0.0215 (5) −0.0027 (4) 0.0000 (4) 0.0016 (4)
N2 0.0229 (5) 0.0348 (6) 0.0251 (5) 0.0010 (4) −0.0008 (4) −0.0017 (4)
C1 0.0243 (6) 0.0241 (6) 0.0205 (5) −0.0011 (4) 0.0001 (4) −0.0021 (4)
C2 0.0216 (6) 0.0256 (6) 0.0229 (6) 0.0004 (4) 0.0010 (4) −0.0021 (4)
C3 0.0201 (6) 0.0174 (5) 0.0212 (6) −0.0025 (4) −0.0009 (4) 0.0014 (4)
C4 0.0252 (6) 0.0292 (6) 0.0194 (5) 0.0010 (5) 0.0008 (4) −0.0019 (4)
C5 0.0205 (6) 0.0330 (7) 0.0234 (6) 0.0017 (5) 0.0027 (4) 0.0007 (5)
C6 0.0233 (6) 0.0231 (6) 0.0210 (5) −0.0005 (4) 0.0020 (5) −0.0015 (4)
O1 0.0188 (4) 0.0422 (5) 0.0194 (4) 0.0009 (4) −0.0011 (3) −0.0046 (4)
O2 0.0200 (5) 0.0370 (5) 0.0295 (5) 0.0029 (4) 0.0000 (3) −0.0074 (4)
C7 0.0301 (7) 0.0302 (7) 0.0279 (6) −0.0046 (5) −0.0085 (5) 0.0007 (5)
C8 0.0263 (6) 0.0208 (6) 0.0223 (6) −0.0048 (4) −0.0037 (5) 0.0030 (4)
C9 0.0196 (6) 0.0288 (6) 0.0249 (6) −0.0008 (4) 0.0015 (4) 0.0019 (5)
C10 0.0217 (6) 0.0275 (6) 0.0189 (5) −0.0023 (5) 0.0019 (4) −0.0001 (4)
C11 0.0208 (6) 0.0177 (5) 0.0198 (5) −0.0027 (4) 0.0009 (4) 0.0010 (4)
C12 0.0234 (6) 0.0259 (6) 0.0253 (6) 0.0006 (5) 0.0024 (5) −0.0032 (5)
C13 0.0320 (7) 0.0289 (6) 0.0205 (5) −0.0012 (5) −0.0002 (5) −0.0044 (5)
C14 0.0205 (6) 0.0186 (5) 0.0220 (6) −0.0024 (4) 0.0018 (4) 0.0003 (4)

Geometric parameters (Å, °)

N1—C1 1.3362 (16) C7—C8 1.5100 (17)
N1—C5 1.3384 (16) C7—H7A 0.9600
N2—C6 1.1461 (16) C7—H7B 0.9600
C1—C2 1.3871 (17) C7—H7C 0.9600
C1—H1A 0.9300 C8—C13 1.3903 (18)
C2—C3 1.3903 (16) C8—C9 1.3946 (17)
C2—H2A 0.9300 C9—C10 1.3866 (17)
C3—C4 1.3903 (17) C9—H9A 0.9300
C3—C6 1.4459 (17) C10—C11 1.3925 (17)
C4—C5 1.3844 (17) C10—H10A 0.9300
C4—H4A 0.9300 C11—C12 1.3886 (16)
C5—H5A 0.9300 C11—C14 1.4942 (16)
O1—C14 1.3202 (14) C12—C13 1.3858 (18)
O1—H1 0.8200 C12—H12A 0.9300
O2—C14 1.2134 (15) C13—H13A 0.9300
C1—N1—C5 118.32 (10) H7B—C7—H7C 109.5
N1—C1—C2 123.14 (11) C13—C8—C9 118.23 (11)
N1—C1—H1A 118.4 C13—C8—C7 120.95 (11)
C2—C1—H1A 118.4 C9—C8—C7 120.82 (11)
C1—C2—C3 117.72 (11) C10—C9—C8 121.01 (11)
C1—C2—H2A 121.1 C10—C9—H9A 119.5
C3—C2—H2A 121.1 C8—C9—H9A 119.5
C4—C3—C2 119.88 (11) C9—C10—C11 120.19 (11)
C4—C3—C6 120.28 (10) C9—C10—H10A 119.9
C2—C3—C6 119.83 (11) C11—C10—H10A 119.9
C5—C4—C3 117.85 (11) C12—C11—C10 119.13 (11)
C5—C4—H4A 121.1 C12—C11—C14 118.85 (11)
C3—C4—H4A 121.1 C10—C11—C14 122.01 (10)
N1—C5—C4 123.09 (11) C13—C12—C11 120.35 (11)
N1—C5—H5A 118.5 C13—C12—H12A 119.8
C4—C5—H5A 118.5 C11—C12—H12A 119.8
N2—C6—C3 178.44 (13) C12—C13—C8 121.09 (11)
C14—O1—H1 109.5 C12—C13—H13A 119.5
C8—C7—H7A 109.5 C8—C13—H13A 119.5
C8—C7—H7B 109.5 O2—C14—O1 123.63 (11)
H7A—C7—H7B 109.5 O2—C14—C11 122.45 (10)
C8—C7—H7C 109.5 O1—C14—C11 113.91 (10)
H7A—C7—H7C 109.5

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
O1—H1···N1 0.82 1.87 2.6850 (15) 175
C1—H1A···O2 0.93 2.51 3.1858 (18) 130
C4—H4A···N2i 0.93 2.60 3.3700 (18) 141

Symmetry codes: (i) −x, y, −z+1/2.

Table 2 Table 2 π-π stacking interactions (Å,°)

Cg1 is the centroid of the C8—C13 ring.Cg2 is the centroid of the N1—C5 ring

CgI CgJ CgI···CgJa CgI···P(J)b CgJ···P(I)c Slippage
Cg1 Cg2ii 3.6797 (11) 3.440 3.443 1.304

Symmetry codes: (ii)3/2-x,1/2-y,1-z Notes:a : Distance between centroidsb : Perpendicular distance of CgI on ring plan Jc : Perpendicular distance of CgJ on ring plan ISlippage = vertical displacement between ring centroids.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: DN2689).

References

  1. Aminabhavi, T. M., Biradar, N. S. & Patil, S. B. (1986). Inorg. Chim. Acta, 125, 125–128.
  2. Bernstein, J., Davis, R. E., Shimoni, L. & Chang, N.-L. (1995). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 34, 1555–1573.
  3. Burnett, M. N. & Johnson, C. K. (1996). ORTEPIII Report ORNL-6895. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Tennessee, USA.
  4. Dai, W. & Fu, D.-W. (2008a). Acta Cryst. E64, m1016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  5. Dai, W. & Fu, D.-W. (2008b). Acta Cryst. E64, m1017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  6. Etter, M. C., MacDonald, J. C. & Bernstein, J. (1990). Acta Cryst. B46, 256–262. [DOI] [PubMed]
  7. Farrugia, L. J. (1997). J. Appl. Cryst. 30, 565.
  8. Fu, D.-W., Ge, J.-Z., Dai, J., Ye, H.-Y. & Qu, Z.-R. (2009). Inorg. Chem. Commun. 12, 994-997.
  9. Rigaku (2005). CrystalClear Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.
  10. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811019799/dn2689sup1.cif

e-67-o1555-sup1.cif (20.1KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811019799/dn2689Isup2.hkl

e-67-o1555-Isup2.hkl (132.5KB, hkl)

Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811019799/dn2689Isup3.cml

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES