Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2011 May 7;67(Pt 6):o1333. doi: 10.1107/S1600536811016448

2-Amino­terephthalic acid–4,4′-bipyridine (1/1)

Wenzhi Xiao a, Ruiting Xue b, Yansheng Yin b,*
PMCID: PMC3120464  PMID: 21754729

Abstract

The asymmetric unit of the title compound, C10H8N2·C8H7NO4, contains two half-mol­ecules, which constitute a 1:1 co-crystal. The 2-amino­terephthalic acid mol­ecule is situated on an inversion center being disordered between two orientations in a 1:1 ratio. In the 4,4′-bipyridine mol­ecule, which is situated on a twofold rotational axis, the two pyridine rings form a dihedral angle of 37.5 (1)°. In the crystal, mol­ecules are held together via inter­molecular N—H⋯O and O—H⋯N hydrogen bonds. The crystal packing exhibits π–π inter­actions between the aromatic rings with a centroid–centroid distance of 3.722 (3) Å.

Related literature

For the crystal structures of polymeric coordination polymers with 2-amino­terephthalic acid linkers, see: Ma et al. (2005) ▶; Bauer et al. (2008 ▶).graphic file with name e-67-o1333-scheme1.jpg

Experimental

Crystal data

  • C10H8N2·C8H7NO4

  • M r = 337.33

  • Monoclinic, Inline graphic

  • a = 16.9501 (18) Å

  • b = 11.1959 (13) Å

  • c = 9.251 (1) Å

  • β = 116.986 (2)°

  • V = 1564.4 (3) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 0.10 mm−1

  • T = 293 K

  • 0.33 × 0.19 × 0.11 mm

Data collection

  • Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996 ▶) T min = 0.967, T max = 0.989

  • 3865 measured reflections

  • 1370 independent reflections

  • 894 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.075

Refinement

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.067

  • wR(F 2) = 0.199

  • S = 1.00

  • 1370 reflections

  • 118 parameters

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 0.32 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.29 e Å−3

Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2007 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2007 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL.

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811016448/cv5085sup1.cif

e-67-o1333-sup1.cif (13.7KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811016448/cv5085Isup2.hkl

e-67-o1333-Isup2.hkl (67.8KB, hkl)

Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811016448/cv5085Isup3.cml

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A D⋯A D—H⋯A
N1—H1A⋯O2i 0.86 2.08 2.931 (5) 172
N1—H1B⋯O2ii 0.86 1.95 2.619 (5) 133
O1—H1⋯N2iii 0.82 1.82 2.635 (3) 170

Symmetry codes: (i) Inline graphic; (ii) Inline graphic; (iii) Inline graphic.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the Scientific Research Fund of Hunan Provincial Education Department (grant No. 10 C0559) and the National Science Foundation of China (grant No. 50672090).

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

Bipyridine is a well known molecule often used as a linker in polymeric coordination compounds. 2-Aminoterephthalic acid is also sometimes used as a linker in polymeric compounds (Ma et al., 2005; Bauer et al., 2008). The title compound (I) is a 1:1 cocrystal of the aforementioned linkers. Herewith we present its crystal structure.

In (I) (Fig. 1), the 2-aminoterephthalic acid molecule is situated on an inversion center, therefore, it is disordered (namely, the amino group is disordered between two positions). The carboxyl groups are twisted from the benzene ring plane at 11.4 (1)°. The 4,4'-bipyridine molecule is situated on a twofold rotational axis, and two pyridine rings form a dihedral angle of 37.5 (1)°.

In the crystal structure, the molecules are held together via intermolecular N—H···O and O—H···N hydrogen bonds. The crystal packing exhibits π—π interactions between the aromatic rings with the centroid-to-centroid distance of 3.722 (3) Å.

Experimental

2-Diaminoterephthalic acid(10 mmol) and 4,4'-bipyridine(10 mmol) were dissolved to methanol (10 ml) and then hydrochloric acid(5 ml) was added. A few minutes later, an methanol solution (10 ml) of tin tetrachloride (5 mmol) was added with stirring. The reaction mixture was stirred for 4 h. The solution was held at room temperature for about two weeks, whereupon yellow crystals of the title compound, which were beyond expectations, were obtained.

Refinement

All H-atoms were positioned geometrically and refined using a riding model, with C—H = 0.93 Å, N—H = 0.86 Å, O—H =0.82 Å and Uiso(H) =1.2Ueq(C), Uiso(H) =1.2Ueq(N), Uiso(H) =1.5Ueq(O).

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

The structure of the title compound, showing 30% probability displacement ellipsoids and the atom-numbering scheme. (symmetry code A: x + 3/2, -y + 3/2, -z and B: -x + 1, y, -z + 3/2). For the disordered molecule of 2-aminoterephthalic acid, only one orientation is shown.

Crystal data

C10H8N2·C8H7NO4 F(000) = 704
Mr = 337.33 Dx = 1.432 Mg m−3
Monoclinic, C2/c Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 16.9501 (18) Å Cell parameters from 1178 reflections
b = 11.1959 (13) Å θ = 2.3–26.0°
c = 9.251 (1) Å µ = 0.10 mm−1
β = 116.986 (2)° T = 293 K
V = 1564.4 (3) Å3 Block, yellow
Z = 4 0.33 × 0.19 × 0.11 mm

Data collection

Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer 1370 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube 894 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphite Rint = 0.075
φ and ω scans θmax = 25.0°, θmin = 2.3°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996) h = −20→12
Tmin = 0.967, Tmax = 0.989 k = −11→13
3865 measured reflections l = −10→10

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: full Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.067 Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.199 H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.00 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.1295P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1370 reflections (Δ/σ)max < 0.001
118 parameters Δρmax = 0.32 e Å−3
0 restraints Δρmin = −0.29 e Å−3

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq Occ. (<1)
N1 0.8270 (3) 0.9576 (4) −0.0096 (6) 0.0607 (13) 0.50
H1A 0.8317 1.0134 0.0577 0.073* 0.50
H1B 0.8478 0.9678 −0.0779 0.073* 0.50
N2 0.39951 (15) 0.8071 (2) 1.0092 (3) 0.0600 (7)
O1 0.67530 (15) 0.82272 (19) 0.2964 (3) 0.0742 (8)
H1 0.6550 0.8097 0.3602 0.111*
O2 0.65519 (15) 0.62839 (19) 0.2565 (3) 0.0711 (7)
C1 0.68006 (18) 0.7229 (3) 0.2283 (3) 0.0520 (8)
C2 0.71594 (15) 0.7367 (2) 0.1106 (3) 0.0436 (7)
C3 0.75521 (17) 0.8419 (2) 0.1014 (3) 0.0459 (7)
H3 0.7595 0.9041 0.1713 0.055*
C4 0.78845 (17) 0.8581 (2) −0.0081 (3) 0.0462 (7)
H4 0.8134 0.9307 −0.0140 0.055* 0.50
C5 0.39774 (19) 0.9000 (3) 0.9217 (3) 0.0594 (8)
H5 0.3689 0.9685 0.9295 0.071*
C6 0.43583 (18) 0.9020 (2) 0.8196 (3) 0.0529 (8)
H6 0.4328 0.9707 0.7606 0.063*
C7 0.47874 (16) 0.8020 (2) 0.8042 (3) 0.0451 (7)
C8 0.47940 (19) 0.7037 (3) 0.8939 (3) 0.0564 (8)
H8 0.5062 0.6331 0.8861 0.068*
C9 0.4404 (2) 0.7104 (3) 0.9947 (4) 0.0646 (9)
H9 0.4427 0.6436 1.0563 0.077*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
N1 0.094 (4) 0.048 (2) 0.071 (3) −0.013 (2) 0.064 (3) −0.013 (2)
N2 0.0592 (15) 0.0888 (17) 0.0500 (14) −0.0024 (13) 0.0404 (13) 0.0035 (12)
O1 0.1089 (18) 0.0821 (14) 0.0749 (15) 0.0006 (12) 0.0797 (15) −0.0074 (11)
O2 0.0983 (17) 0.0765 (14) 0.0719 (15) 0.0073 (12) 0.0679 (14) 0.0144 (11)
C1 0.0551 (16) 0.0688 (19) 0.0402 (15) 0.0119 (14) 0.0287 (13) 0.0078 (13)
C2 0.0456 (14) 0.0573 (15) 0.0366 (14) 0.0069 (12) 0.0264 (12) 0.0046 (11)
C3 0.0504 (15) 0.0575 (15) 0.0381 (14) 0.0071 (12) 0.0273 (13) −0.0029 (11)
C4 0.0520 (16) 0.0550 (15) 0.0440 (15) 0.0023 (12) 0.0324 (13) 0.0046 (11)
C5 0.0643 (18) 0.0808 (19) 0.0509 (18) 0.0050 (15) 0.0416 (16) −0.0027 (14)
C6 0.0640 (17) 0.0658 (17) 0.0448 (15) 0.0036 (14) 0.0385 (14) 0.0031 (12)
C7 0.0429 (14) 0.0644 (16) 0.0342 (13) −0.0031 (12) 0.0229 (12) −0.0010 (11)
C8 0.0624 (17) 0.0661 (17) 0.0552 (17) 0.0057 (14) 0.0394 (15) 0.0089 (13)
C9 0.073 (2) 0.0802 (19) 0.0576 (18) −0.0005 (16) 0.0443 (17) 0.0180 (15)

Geometric parameters (Å, °)

N1—C4 1.295 (5) C3—H3 0.9300
N1—H1A 0.8600 C4—C2i 1.403 (4)
N1—H1B 0.8600 C4—H4 0.9300
N2—C5 1.310 (3) C5—C6 1.365 (3)
N2—C9 1.325 (4) C5—H5 0.9300
O1—C1 1.304 (3) C6—C7 1.378 (3)
O1—H1 0.8200 C6—H6 0.9300
O2—C1 1.210 (3) C7—C8 1.376 (3)
C1—C2 1.476 (4) C7—C7ii 1.477 (5)
C2—C3 1.374 (4) C8—C9 1.368 (4)
C2—C4i 1.403 (4) C8—H8 0.9300
C3—C4 1.376 (4) C9—H9 0.9300
C4—N1—H1A 120.0 C3—C4—H4 120.5
C4—N1—H1B 120.0 C2i—C4—H4 120.5
H1A—N1—H1B 120.0 N2—C5—C6 123.8 (3)
C5—N2—C9 116.9 (2) N2—C5—H5 118.1
C1—O1—H1 109.5 C6—C5—H5 118.1
O2—C1—O1 122.8 (3) C5—C6—C7 119.7 (3)
O2—C1—C2 123.5 (3) C5—C6—H6 120.1
O1—C1—C2 113.7 (3) C7—C6—H6 120.1
C3—C2—C4i 119.0 (2) C8—C7—C6 116.6 (2)
C3—C2—C1 120.6 (2) C8—C7—C7ii 122.47 (18)
C4i—C2—C1 120.4 (2) C6—C7—C7ii 120.88 (17)
C2—C3—C4 122.0 (2) C9—C8—C7 119.5 (3)
C2—C3—H3 119.0 C9—C8—H8 120.2
C4—C3—H3 119.0 C7—C8—H8 120.2
N1—C4—C3 119.8 (3) N2—C9—C8 123.4 (3)
N1—C4—C2i 121.1 (3) N2—C9—H9 118.3
C3—C4—C2i 119.0 (2) C8—C9—H9 118.3
N1—C4—H4 3.0

Symmetry codes: (i) −x+3/2, −y+3/2, −z; (ii) −x+1, y, −z+3/2.

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
N1—H1A···O2iii 0.86 2.08 2.931 (5) 172
N1—H1B···O2i 0.86 1.95 2.619 (5) 133
O1—H1···N2ii 0.82 1.82 2.635 (3) 170

Symmetry codes: (iii) −x+3/2, y+1/2, −z+1/2; (i) −x+3/2, −y+3/2, −z; (ii) −x+1, y, −z+3/2.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: CV5085).

References

  1. Bauer, S., Serre, C., Devic, T., Horcajada, P., Marrot, J., Ferey, G. & Stock, N. (2008). Inorg. Chem. 47, 7568–7576. [DOI] [PubMed]
  2. Bruker (2007). SMART and SAINT Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  3. Ma, A.-Q., Cai, G.-Q. & Zhu, L.-G. (2005). Z. Kristallogr. New Cryst. Struct. 220, 139–140.
  4. Sheldrick, G. M. (1996). SADABS University of Göttingen, Germany.
  5. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811016448/cv5085sup1.cif

e-67-o1333-sup1.cif (13.7KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811016448/cv5085Isup2.hkl

e-67-o1333-Isup2.hkl (67.8KB, hkl)

Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811016448/cv5085Isup3.cml

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES