Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2011 May 28;67(Pt 6):o1540. doi: 10.1107/S1600536811019416

4-Chloro-N-(3-methyl­phen­yl)benzene­sulfonamide

K Shakuntala a, Sabine Foro b, B Thimme Gowda a,*
PMCID: PMC3120465  PMID: 21754899

Abstract

In the crystal of the title compound, C13H12ClNO2S, the N—H bond is anti to the meta-methyl group in the aniline ring. The C—SO2—NH—C torsion angle is −57.6 (2)°. The sulfonyl and aniline benzene rings are tilted relative to each other by 84.7 (1)°. The crystal structure features inversion-related dimers linked by pairs of N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds.

Related literature

For hydrogen-bonding modes of sulfonamides, see; Adsmond & Grant (2001). For our study of the effect of substituents on the structures of N-(ar­yl)-amides, see: Gowda et al. (2004), on the structures of N-(ar­yl)aryl­sulfonamides, see: Gowda et al. (2010); Nirmala et al. (2009); Shakuntala et al. (2011) and on the structures of N-(ar­yl)methane­sulfonamides, see: Gowda et al. (2007).graphic file with name e-67-o1540-scheme1.jpg

Experimental

Crystal data

  • C13H12ClNO2S

  • M r = 281.75

  • Monoclinic, Inline graphic

  • a = 14.202 (1) Å

  • b = 14.561 (1) Å

  • c = 13.271 (1) Å

  • β = 97.292 (9)°

  • V = 2722.2 (3) Å3

  • Z = 8

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 0.43 mm−1

  • T = 293 K

  • 0.48 × 0.44 × 0.40 mm

Data collection

  • Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur diffractometer with a Sapphire CCD detector

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis RED; Oxford Diffraction, 2009) T min = 0.821, T max = 0.848

  • 5706 measured reflections

  • 2777 independent reflections

  • 2186 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.012

Refinement

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.043

  • wR(F 2) = 0.119

  • S = 1.05

  • 2777 reflections

  • 167 parameters

  • 1 restraint

  • H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement

  • Δρmax = 0.44 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.45 e Å−3

Data collection: CrysAlis CCD (Oxford Diffraction, 2009); cell refinement: CrysAlis RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2009); data reduction: CrysAlis RED; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: PLATON (Spek, 2009); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811019416/ds2114sup1.cif

e-67-o1540-sup1.cif (17.1KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811019416/ds2114Isup2.hkl

e-67-o1540-Isup2.hkl (136.4KB, hkl)

Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811019416/ds2114Isup3.cml

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N1—H1N⋯O2i 0.84 (2) 2.11 (2) 2.942 (2) 172 (2)

Symmetry code: (i) Inline graphic.

Acknowledgments

KS thanks the University Grants Commission, Government of India, New Delhi, for the award of a research fellowship under its faculty improvement program.

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

The sulfonamide moieties are the constituents of many biologically important compounds. The hydrogen bonding preferences of sulfonamides has been investigated (Adsmond & Grant, 2001). As a part of studying the substituent effects on the structures of this class of compounds (Gowda et al., 2004, 2007, 2010; Nirmala et al., 2009, Shakuntala et al., 2011), in the present work, the crystal structure of 4-chloro-N-(3-methylphenyl)-benzenesulfonamide (I) has been determined (Fig.1). In the title compound, the N—C bond in the C—SO2—NH—C segment has gauche torsions with respect to the S═O bonds. Furthermore, the N—H bond is anti to the meta-methyl group in the anilino ring, similar to that observed in 4-methyl-N-(3-methylphenyl)-benzenesulfonamide (II) (Nirmala et al., 2009), but in contrast to the syn conformation observed with respect to the meta-methyl groups in N-(3-methylphenyl)-benzenesulfonamide (III) (Gowda et al., 2010)

The molecule is twisted at the S atom with the C—SO2—NH—C torsion angle of -57.6 (2)°, compared to the values of 56.7 (3)° in (II), 55.8 (2)° (molecule 1) and -58.4 (3)° (molecule 2) in the two molecules of (III), and -53.8 (3)° and -63.4 (3)° in the two independent molecules of 4-chloro-N-(phenyl)-benzenesulfonamide (IV)(Shakuntala et al., 2011).

The sulfonyl and the anilino benzene rings are tilted relative to each other by 84.7 (1)° in (I), compared to the values of 83.9 (1)° in (II), 67.9 (1)° (molecule 1) and 68.6 (1)° (molecule 2) in (III), and 69.1 (1)° and 82.6 (1)° in the two independent molecules of (IV).

The packing of molecules in the crystal via intermolecular N—H···O hydrogen bonds (Table 1) is shown in Fig. 2.

Experimental

The solution of chlorobenzene (10 ml) in chloroform (40 ml) was treated dropwise with chlorosulfonic acid (25 ml) at 0 ° C. After the initial evolution of hydrogen chloride subsided, the reaction mixture was brought to room temperature and poured into crushed ice in a beaker. The chloroform layer was separated, washed with cold water and allowed to evaporate slowly. The residual 4-chlorobenzenesulfonylchloride was treated with m-toluidine in the stoichiometric ratio and boiled for ten minutes. The reaction mixture was then cooled to room temperature and added to ice cold water (100 ml). The resultant 4-chloro-N-(3-methylphenyl)-benzenesulfonamide was filtered under suction and washed thoroughly with cold water. It was then recrystallized to constant melting point from dilute ethanol. The compound was characterized by recording its infrared and NMR spectra.

Needle like colorless single crystals used in X-ray diffraction studies were grown in ethanolic solution by slow evaporation at room temperature.

Refinement

The H atom of the NH group was located in a difference map and later restrained to the distance N—H = 0.86 (2) Å. The other H atoms were positioned with idealized geometry using a riding model with the aromatic C—H = 0.93Å and the methyl C—H = 0.96 Å. All H atoms were refined with isotropic displacement parameters (set to 1.2 times of the Ueq of the parent atom).

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Molecular structure of (I), showing the atom labelling scheme and displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Molecular packing of (I) with hydrogen bonding shown as dashed lines.

Crystal data

C13H12ClNO2S F(000) = 1168
Mr = 281.75 Dx = 1.375 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/c Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -C 2yc Cell parameters from 2392 reflections
a = 14.202 (1) Å θ = 2.7–27.8°
b = 14.561 (1) Å µ = 0.43 mm1
c = 13.271 (1) Å T = 293 K
β = 97.292 (9)° Prism, colourless
V = 2722.2 (3) Å3 0.48 × 0.44 × 0.40 mm
Z = 8

Data collection

Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur diffractometer with a Sapphire CCD detector 2777 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube 2186 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphite Rint = 0.012
Rotation method data acquisition using ω scans θmax = 26.4°, θmin = 2.7°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis RED; Oxford Diffraction, 2009) h = −17→16
Tmin = 0.821, Tmax = 0.848 k = −18→18
5706 measured reflections l = −16→16

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: full Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.043 Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.119 H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.05 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0632P)2 + 1.8143P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2777 reflections (Δ/σ)max = 0.008
167 parameters Δρmax = 0.44 e Å3
1 restraint Δρmin = −0.45 e Å3

Special details

Experimental. CrysAlis RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2009) Empirical absorption correction using spherical harmonics, implemented in SCALE3 ABSPACK scaling algorithm.
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
C1 0.53559 (14) 0.23409 (14) 0.05005 (15) 0.0406 (5)
C2 0.57647 (15) 0.31911 (14) 0.04598 (18) 0.0491 (5)
H2 0.6336 0.3256 0.0194 0.059*
C3 0.53266 (18) 0.39513 (17) 0.0813 (2) 0.0593 (6)
H3 0.5600 0.4530 0.0788 0.071*
C4 0.44869 (19) 0.3845 (2) 0.11999 (18) 0.0605 (7)
C5 0.40852 (18) 0.3008 (2) 0.1274 (2) 0.0730 (8)
H5 0.3523 0.2950 0.1560 0.088*
C6 0.45174 (18) 0.2240 (2) 0.0922 (2) 0.0644 (7)
H6 0.4247 0.1662 0.0967 0.077*
C7 0.67268 (14) 0.08513 (13) 0.18508 (15) 0.0388 (4)
C8 0.73805 (14) 0.15662 (14) 0.19410 (16) 0.0442 (5)
H8 0.7430 0.1949 0.1389 0.053*
C9 0.79595 (16) 0.17110 (16) 0.28509 (18) 0.0522 (5)
C10 0.78847 (19) 0.11271 (18) 0.36573 (19) 0.0617 (6)
H10 0.8272 0.1215 0.4269 0.074*
C11 0.72408 (19) 0.04155 (17) 0.35625 (19) 0.0611 (6)
H11 0.7202 0.0024 0.4110 0.073*
C12 0.66545 (16) 0.02758 (15) 0.26704 (18) 0.0500 (5)
H12 0.6214 −0.0200 0.2616 0.060*
C13 0.8658 (2) 0.2492 (2) 0.2948 (2) 0.0907 (10)
H13A 0.8476 0.2935 0.3423 0.109*
H13B 0.8664 0.2779 0.2297 0.109*
H13C 0.9281 0.2262 0.3184 0.109*
N1 0.61358 (14) 0.06654 (12) 0.09302 (14) 0.0510 (5)
H1N 0.5746 (16) 0.0231 (14) 0.092 (2) 0.061*
O1 0.67240 (11) 0.16746 (10) −0.03772 (11) 0.0512 (4)
O2 0.51716 (12) 0.09095 (11) −0.06921 (12) 0.0610 (5)
Cl1 0.38998 (7) 0.48058 (7) 0.15793 (7) 0.1027 (4)
S1 0.58782 (4) 0.13761 (3) −0.00050 (4) 0.04315 (18)

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
C1 0.0383 (10) 0.0444 (11) 0.0372 (10) −0.0031 (8) −0.0019 (8) 0.0028 (9)
C2 0.0448 (11) 0.0439 (12) 0.0593 (13) −0.0027 (9) 0.0093 (10) −0.0030 (10)
C3 0.0589 (14) 0.0483 (13) 0.0702 (16) 0.0051 (11) 0.0061 (12) −0.0041 (12)
C4 0.0637 (15) 0.0735 (17) 0.0444 (12) 0.0243 (13) 0.0070 (11) 0.0019 (12)
C5 0.0540 (15) 0.103 (2) 0.0668 (16) 0.0160 (15) 0.0266 (13) 0.0172 (16)
C6 0.0540 (14) 0.0701 (17) 0.0708 (16) −0.0093 (13) 0.0150 (12) 0.0166 (14)
C7 0.0395 (10) 0.0315 (9) 0.0440 (11) 0.0032 (8) −0.0004 (8) −0.0019 (8)
C8 0.0463 (11) 0.0412 (11) 0.0433 (11) −0.0026 (9) −0.0017 (9) 0.0033 (9)
C9 0.0493 (12) 0.0527 (12) 0.0508 (12) −0.0051 (10) −0.0086 (10) −0.0008 (11)
C10 0.0654 (15) 0.0674 (16) 0.0470 (13) 0.0000 (12) −0.0129 (11) 0.0024 (12)
C11 0.0754 (16) 0.0580 (14) 0.0482 (13) 0.0013 (13) 0.0012 (12) 0.0140 (12)
C12 0.0521 (12) 0.0405 (11) 0.0570 (13) −0.0014 (9) 0.0049 (10) 0.0048 (10)
C13 0.089 (2) 0.100 (2) 0.0737 (19) −0.0454 (18) −0.0238 (16) 0.0067 (18)
N1 0.0607 (12) 0.0336 (9) 0.0535 (11) −0.0148 (8) −0.0127 (9) 0.0027 (8)
O1 0.0560 (9) 0.0485 (8) 0.0505 (9) −0.0052 (7) 0.0128 (7) −0.0060 (7)
O2 0.0759 (11) 0.0490 (9) 0.0514 (9) −0.0178 (8) −0.0183 (8) −0.0017 (7)
Cl1 0.1129 (7) 0.1136 (7) 0.0848 (6) 0.0634 (6) 0.0249 (5) −0.0053 (5)
S1 0.0500 (3) 0.0366 (3) 0.0402 (3) −0.0082 (2) −0.0044 (2) −0.0017 (2)

Geometric parameters (Å, °)

C1—C2 1.371 (3) C8—H8 0.9300
C1—C6 1.386 (3) C9—C10 1.381 (3)
C1—S1 1.761 (2) C9—C13 1.505 (3)
C2—C3 1.381 (3) C10—C11 1.377 (4)
C2—H2 0.9300 C10—H10 0.9300
C3—C4 1.366 (4) C11—C12 1.373 (3)
C3—H3 0.9300 C11—H11 0.9300
C4—C5 1.354 (4) C12—H12 0.9300
C4—Cl1 1.736 (3) C13—H13A 0.9600
C5—C6 1.386 (4) C13—H13B 0.9600
C5—H5 0.9300 C13—H13C 0.9600
C6—H6 0.9300 N1—S1 1.6216 (19)
C7—C12 1.387 (3) N1—H1N 0.839 (16)
C7—C8 1.390 (3) O1—S1 1.4236 (15)
C7—N1 1.418 (3) O2—S1 1.4380 (15)
C8—C9 1.388 (3)
C2—C1—C6 120.1 (2) C8—C9—C13 120.0 (2)
C2—C1—S1 120.29 (16) C11—C10—C9 120.5 (2)
C6—C1—S1 119.59 (18) C11—C10—H10 119.7
C1—C2—C3 119.9 (2) C9—C10—H10 119.7
C1—C2—H2 120.0 C12—C11—C10 120.9 (2)
C3—C2—H2 120.0 C12—C11—H11 119.6
C4—C3—C2 119.3 (2) C10—C11—H11 119.6
C4—C3—H3 120.4 C11—C12—C7 119.3 (2)
C2—C3—H3 120.4 C11—C12—H12 120.4
C5—C4—C3 121.7 (2) C7—C12—H12 120.4
C5—C4—Cl1 118.8 (2) C9—C13—H13A 109.5
C3—C4—Cl1 119.5 (2) C9—C13—H13B 109.5
C4—C5—C6 119.5 (2) H13A—C13—H13B 109.5
C4—C5—H5 120.2 C9—C13—H13C 109.5
C6—C5—H5 120.2 H13A—C13—H13C 109.5
C5—C6—C1 119.4 (2) H13B—C13—H13C 109.5
C5—C6—H6 120.3 C7—N1—S1 126.09 (14)
C1—C6—H6 120.3 C7—N1—H1N 118.7 (18)
C12—C7—C8 120.01 (19) S1—N1—H1N 112.3 (18)
C12—C7—N1 117.75 (18) O1—S1—O2 118.42 (10)
C8—C7—N1 122.22 (18) O1—S1—N1 110.01 (10)
C9—C8—C7 120.3 (2) O2—S1—N1 104.79 (9)
C9—C8—H8 119.9 O1—S1—C1 107.66 (9)
C7—C8—H8 119.9 O2—S1—C1 108.95 (10)
C10—C9—C8 119.0 (2) N1—S1—C1 106.42 (10)
C10—C9—C13 120.9 (2)
C6—C1—C2—C3 −1.8 (4) C9—C10—C11—C12 −0.6 (4)
S1—C1—C2—C3 176.87 (18) C10—C11—C12—C7 1.2 (4)
C1—C2—C3—C4 0.0 (4) C8—C7—C12—C11 −0.7 (3)
C2—C3—C4—C5 2.0 (4) N1—C7—C12—C11 177.6 (2)
C2—C3—C4—Cl1 −176.41 (19) C12—C7—N1—S1 161.80 (17)
C3—C4—C5—C6 −2.0 (4) C8—C7—N1—S1 −19.9 (3)
Cl1—C4—C5—C6 176.4 (2) C7—N1—S1—O1 58.7 (2)
C4—C5—C6—C1 0.1 (4) C7—N1—S1—O2 −172.95 (19)
C2—C1—C6—C5 1.8 (4) C7—N1—S1—C1 −57.6 (2)
S1—C1—C6—C5 −176.92 (19) C2—C1—S1—O1 1.6 (2)
C12—C7—C8—C9 −0.4 (3) C6—C1—S1—O1 −179.70 (18)
N1—C7—C8—C9 −178.6 (2) C2—C1—S1—O2 −127.99 (18)
C7—C8—C9—C10 0.9 (3) C6—C1—S1—O2 50.7 (2)
C7—C8—C9—C13 −179.3 (2) C2—C1—S1—N1 119.52 (19)
C8—C9—C10—C11 −0.4 (4) C6—C1—S1—N1 −61.8 (2)
C13—C9—C10—C11 179.8 (3)

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
N1—H1N···O2i 0.84 (2) 2.11 (2) 2.942 (2) 172 (2)

Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, −y, −z.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: DS2114).

References

  1. Adsmond, D. A. & Grant, D. J. W. (2001). J. Pharm. Sci. 90, 2058–2077. [DOI] [PubMed]
  2. Gowda, B. T., Foro, S. & Fuess, H. (2007). Acta Cryst. E63, o2597.
  3. Gowda, B. T., Foro, S., Nirmala, P. G. & Fuess, H. (2010). Acta Cryst. E66, o434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  4. Gowda, B. T., Svoboda, I. & Fuess, H. (2004). Z. Naturforsch. Teil A, 55, 845–852.
  5. Nirmala, P. G., Gowda, B. T., Foro, S. & Fuess, H. (2009). Acta Cryst. E65, o3208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  6. Oxford Diffraction (2009). CrysAlis CCD and CrysAlis RED Oxford Diffraction Ltd, Yarnton, England.
  7. Shakuntala, K., Foro, S. & Gowda, B. T. (2011). Acta Cryst. E67, o1252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  8. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  9. Spek, A. L. (2009). Acta Cryst. D65, 148–155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811019416/ds2114sup1.cif

e-67-o1540-sup1.cif (17.1KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811019416/ds2114Isup2.hkl

e-67-o1540-Isup2.hkl (136.4KB, hkl)

Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811019416/ds2114Isup3.cml

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES