Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2011 May 7;67(Pt 6):o1359. doi: 10.1107/S1600536811016825

3-Nitro­benzene-1,2-diamine

Richard Betz a,*, Thomas Gerber a
PMCID: PMC3120524  PMID: 21754753

Abstract

The mol­ecule of the title compound, C6H7N3O2, a derivative of o-phenyl­enediamine, nearly shows non-crystallographic C s symmetry. C—C—C angles span the range 116.25 (11)–122.35 (11)°. In the crystal, inter­molecular N—H⋯O and N—H⋯N hydrogen bonds connect mol­ecules into undulating sheets perpendicular to the crystallographic a axis. A weak intra­molecular N—H⋯O hydrogen bond is also observed. No π-stacking is observed in the crystal structure.

Related literature

For the crystal structure of 1,2-diamino­benzene, see: Stalhandske (1981); Czapik & Gdaniec (2010). For graph-set analysis of hydrogen bonds, see: Etter et al. (1990); Bernstein et al. (1995). For the use of chelate ligands in coordination chemistry, see: Gade (1998). For the crystal structures of coordination compounds with rhenium in different oxidation states applying (mixed) oxygen-, nitro­gen- and/or sulfur-containing ligands, see: Chiozzone et al. (1999); Videira et al. (2009); Edwards et al. (1998); Marti et al. (2005); Babich et al. (2001).graphic file with name e-67-o1359-scheme1.jpg

Experimental

Crystal data

  • C6H7N3O2

  • M r = 153.15

  • Monoclinic, Inline graphic

  • a = 13.2854 (5) Å

  • b = 3.7504 (1) Å

  • c = 16.3309 (6) Å

  • β = 126.208 (2)°

  • V = 656.55 (4) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 0.12 mm−1

  • T = 200 K

  • 0.55 × 0.24 × 0.11 mm

Data collection

  • Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer

  • 6477 measured reflections

  • 1605 independent reflections

  • 1262 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.043

Refinement

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.040

  • wR(F 2) = 0.115

  • S = 1.05

  • 1605 reflections

  • 113 parameters

  • 6 restraints

  • H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement

  • Δρmax = 0.30 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.17 e Å−3

Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2010); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2010); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997) and Mercury (Macrae et al., 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97 and PLATON (Spek, 2009).

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811016825/sj5135sup1.cif

e-67-o1359-sup1.cif (13.1KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811016825/sj5135Isup2.hkl

e-67-o1359-Isup2.hkl (79.2KB, hkl)

Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811016825/sj5135Isup3.cml

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N1—H711⋯O1i 0.89 (1) 2.41 (2) 3.1257 (14) 138 (2)
N2—H721⋯N1ii 0.88 (1) 2.26 (1) 3.0800 (16) 156 (2)
N2—H722⋯O1 0.88 (1) 1.98 (1) 2.6084 (14) 127 (1)
N2—H722⋯O1iii 0.88 (1) 2.55 (2) 3.1416 (16) 126 (1)

Symmetry codes: (i) Inline graphic; (ii) Inline graphic; (iii) Inline graphic.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Mr Henk Schalekamp for helpful discussions.

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

Chelate ligands have found widespread use in coordination chemistry due to the enhanced thermodynamic stability of resultant coordination compounds in relation to coordination compounds exclusively applying comparable monodentate ligands (Gade 1998). Combining different sets of donor atoms in one chelate ligand molecule, a probe for testing and accomodating metal centers of different Lewis acidities is at hand. For the crystal structures of coordination compounds with rhenium in different oxidation states applying (mixed) oxygen-, nitrogen- and/or sulfur-containing ligands, see: Chiozzone et al. (1999); Videira et al. (2009); Edwards et al. (1998); Marti et al. (2005); Babich et al. (2001). The title compound, which offers two amino and one nitro group in close proximity to each other, seemed particularily interesting in this aspect. To enable comparative studies with the crystal structures of envisioned coordination compounds, the structure of the free ligand was determined. The crystal structure of 1,2-diaminobenzene is apparent in the literature (Stalhandske 1981, Czapik & Gdaniec 2010).

Intracyclic angles cover a range of 116–122 ° with the smallest angle present on the C-atom in between the C-atoms bearing the nitro as well as an amino group. The nitro group is nearly completely in plane with the aromatic system. The least-squares planes defined by their respective atoms intersect at an angle of only 3.93 (18) ° (Fig. 1).

Except for one of the H-atoms of the amino group in meta-position to the nitro group, all of the hydrogen atoms of the amino groups participate in hydrogen bonds in the crystal structure. While one of the O-atoms of the nitro group acts as twofold acceptor, the second one does not take part in this type of intermolecular contacts. In terms of graph-set analysis, (Etter et al. 1990, Bernstein et al. 1995), the descriptor for the hydrogen bonding system on the unitary level is C11(5)C11(7)R22(12). In total, the molecules are connected to waved sheets perpendicular to the crystallographic a-axis. π-stacking is not observed in the crystal structure of the title compound (Fig. 2).

The molecular packing is shown in Figure 3.

Experimental

The compound was obtained commercially (Aldrich). Crystals suitable for the X-ray diffraction study were obtained upon recrystallization from ethanol.

Refinement

Carbon-bound H-atoms were placed in calculated positions (C—H 0.95 Å) and were included in the refinement in the riding model approximation, with U(H) set to 1.2Ueq(C). The H-atoms of the amine groups were located on a difference Fourier map, and their N—H distances as well as their H–N–H angles were refined using DFIX instructions with one common free variable, with their U(H) set to 1.5Ueq(N).

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

The molecular structure of the title compound, with atom labels and anisotropic displacement ellipsoids (drawn at 50% probability level).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Intermolecular contacts, viewed approximately along [010]. Symmetry operators: ix, -y + 3/2, z + 1/2; ii -x, y + 1/2, -z + 1/2; iii -x, y - 1/2, -z + 1/2; iv -x, -y + 1, -z; vx, -y + 3/2, z - 1/2.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Molecular packing of the title compound, viewed along [0 1 0] (anisotropic displacement ellipsoids drawn at 50% probability level).

Crystal data

C6H7N3O2 F(000) = 320
Mr = 153.15 Dx = 1.549 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/c Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybc Cell parameters from 3115 reflections
a = 13.2854 (5) Å θ = 2.5–28.2°
b = 3.7504 (1) Å µ = 0.12 mm1
c = 16.3309 (6) Å T = 200 K
β = 126.208 (2)° Rod, red
V = 656.55 (4) Å3 0.55 × 0.24 × 0.11 mm
Z = 4

Data collection

Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer 1262 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube Rint = 0.043
graphite θmax = 28.3°, θmin = 3.1°
φ and ω scans h = −17→17
6477 measured reflections k = −4→4
1605 independent reflections l = −21→21

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: full Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.040 Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.115 H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.05 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.055P)2 + 0.1822P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1605 reflections (Δ/σ)max < 0.001
113 parameters Δρmax = 0.30 e Å3
6 restraints Δρmin = −0.17 e Å3

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
O1 0.13915 (10) 0.7321 (4) 0.03335 (7) 0.0524 (3)
O2 0.30745 (12) 1.0010 (4) 0.07783 (10) 0.0687 (4)
N1 0.13706 (12) 0.8731 (4) 0.34249 (9) 0.0419 (3)
H711 0.1778 (16) 0.888 (5) 0.4092 (10) 0.063*
H712 0.1066 (16) 0.649 (4) 0.3250 (14) 0.063*
N2 0.07013 (10) 0.7189 (3) 0.15331 (8) 0.0346 (3)
H721 0.0209 (14) 0.662 (5) 0.1708 (12) 0.052*
H722 0.0458 (15) 0.663 (5) 0.0919 (10) 0.052*
N3 0.23536 (11) 0.9000 (3) 0.09715 (8) 0.0382 (3)
C1 0.22068 (11) 0.9559 (3) 0.31843 (9) 0.0289 (3)
C2 0.18152 (10) 0.8773 (3) 0.21809 (8) 0.0241 (3)
C3 0.26459 (10) 0.9743 (3) 0.19499 (8) 0.0268 (3)
C4 0.37907 (11) 1.1429 (3) 0.26574 (11) 0.0349 (3)
H4 0.4329 1.2060 0.2477 0.042*
C5 0.41227 (12) 1.2152 (4) 0.36057 (10) 0.0397 (3)
H5 0.4895 1.3289 0.4091 0.048*
C6 0.33235 (12) 1.1214 (4) 0.38622 (9) 0.0374 (3)
H6 0.3561 1.1739 0.4524 0.045*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
O1 0.0500 (6) 0.0787 (8) 0.0285 (5) −0.0038 (6) 0.0231 (5) −0.0108 (5)
O2 0.0701 (8) 0.1063 (11) 0.0630 (7) −0.0052 (7) 0.0575 (7) 0.0026 (7)
N1 0.0512 (7) 0.0525 (8) 0.0371 (6) 0.0146 (6) 0.0344 (6) 0.0103 (6)
N2 0.0294 (5) 0.0433 (7) 0.0331 (5) −0.0028 (4) 0.0195 (5) −0.0030 (5)
N3 0.0430 (6) 0.0493 (7) 0.0343 (6) 0.0089 (5) 0.0294 (5) 0.0054 (5)
C1 0.0353 (6) 0.0286 (6) 0.0263 (5) 0.0121 (5) 0.0201 (5) 0.0066 (5)
C2 0.0261 (5) 0.0237 (5) 0.0244 (5) 0.0061 (4) 0.0160 (4) 0.0031 (4)
C3 0.0299 (6) 0.0276 (6) 0.0264 (5) 0.0052 (4) 0.0185 (5) 0.0035 (4)
C4 0.0300 (6) 0.0283 (6) 0.0472 (7) 0.0024 (5) 0.0233 (6) 0.0037 (5)
C5 0.0305 (6) 0.0294 (7) 0.0404 (7) 0.0011 (5) 0.0106 (5) −0.0050 (5)
C6 0.0433 (7) 0.0331 (7) 0.0249 (6) 0.0114 (5) 0.0140 (5) −0.0011 (5)

Geometric parameters (Å, °)

O1—N3 1.2420 (16) C1—C6 1.3681 (18)
O2—N3 1.2318 (15) C1—C2 1.4268 (15)
N1—C1 1.4142 (16) C2—C3 1.4088 (15)
N1—H711 0.887 (12) C3—C4 1.4041 (17)
N1—H712 0.903 (12) C4—C5 1.364 (2)
N2—C2 1.3462 (15) C4—H4 0.9500
N2—H721 0.880 (12) C5—C6 1.397 (2)
N2—H722 0.878 (12) C5—H5 0.9500
N3—C3 1.4313 (15) C6—H6 0.9500
C1—N1—H711 108.5 (12) C3—C2—C1 116.25 (11)
C1—N1—H712 113.3 (12) C4—C3—C2 122.35 (11)
H711—N1—H712 106.4 (15) C4—C3—N3 117.01 (11)
C2—N2—H721 122.3 (11) C2—C3—N3 120.64 (11)
C2—N2—H722 119.6 (11) C5—C4—C3 119.38 (12)
H721—N2—H722 118.0 (14) C5—C4—H4 120.3
O2—N3—O1 120.77 (12) C3—C4—H4 120.3
O2—N3—C3 119.13 (12) C4—C5—C6 119.81 (12)
O1—N3—C3 120.09 (10) C4—C5—H5 120.1
C6—C1—N1 121.95 (11) C6—C5—H5 120.1
C6—C1—C2 120.56 (11) C1—C6—C5 121.65 (12)
N1—C1—C2 117.41 (11) C1—C6—H6 119.2
N2—C2—C3 125.10 (10) C5—C6—H6 119.2
N2—C2—C1 118.65 (10)
C6—C1—C2—N2 −179.04 (11) O1—N3—C3—C4 175.60 (12)
N1—C1—C2—N2 −2.26 (17) O2—N3—C3—C2 177.07 (12)
C6—C1—C2—C3 0.96 (17) O1—N3—C3—C2 −3.77 (19)
N1—C1—C2—C3 177.74 (10) C2—C3—C4—C5 0.29 (19)
N2—C2—C3—C4 179.27 (11) N3—C3—C4—C5 −179.07 (11)
C1—C2—C3—C4 −0.73 (17) C3—C4—C5—C6 −0.04 (19)
N2—C2—C3—N3 −1.39 (19) N1—C1—C6—C5 −177.40 (12)
C1—C2—C3—N3 178.60 (10) C2—C1—C6—C5 −0.78 (19)
O2—N3—C3—C4 −3.56 (19) C4—C5—C6—C1 0.3 (2)

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
N1—H711···O1i 0.89 (1) 2.41 (2) 3.1257 (14) 138.(2)
N2—H721···N1ii 0.88 (1) 2.26 (1) 3.0800 (16) 156.(2)
N2—H722···O1 0.88 (1) 1.98 (1) 2.6084 (14) 127.(1)
N2—H722···O1iii 0.88 (1) 2.55 (2) 3.1416 (16) 126.(1)

Symmetry codes: (i) x, −y+3/2, z+1/2; (ii) −x, y−1/2, −z+1/2; (iii) −x, −y+1, −z.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: SJ5135).

References

  1. Babich, J. W., Graham, W., Femia, F. J., Dong, Q., Barzana, M., Ferrill, K., Fischman, A. J. & Zubieta, J. (2001). Inorg. Chim. Acta, 323, 23–36.
  2. Bernstein, J., Davis, R. E., Shimoni, L. & Chang, N.-L. (1995). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 34, 1555–1573.
  3. Bruker (2010). APEX2 and SAINT Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  4. Chiozzone, R., González, R., Kremer, C., De Munno, G., Cano, J., Lloret, F., Julve, M. & Faus, J. (1999). Inorg. Chem. 38, 4745—4752. [DOI] [PubMed]
  5. Czapik, A. & Gdaniec, M. (2010). Acta Cryst. C66, o198–o201. [DOI] [PubMed]
  6. Edwards, P. G., Jokela, J., Lehtonen, A. & Sillanpää, R. (1998). J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. pp. 3287–3294.
  7. Etter, M. C., MacDonald, J. C. & Bernstein, J. (1990). Acta Cryst. B46, 256–262. [DOI] [PubMed]
  8. Farrugia, L. J. (1997). J. Appl. Cryst. 30, 565.
  9. Gade, L. H. (1998). Koordinationschemie, 1. Auflage. Weinheim: Wiley–VCH.
  10. Macrae, C. F., Bruno, I. J., Chisholm, J. A., Edgington, P. R., McCabe, P., Pidcock, E., Rodriguez-Monge, L., Taylor, R., van de Streek, J. & Wood, P. A. (2008). J. Appl. Cryst. 41, 466–470.
  11. Marti, N., Spingler, B., Breher, F. & Schibli, R. (2005). Inorg. Chem. 44, 6082–6091. [DOI] [PubMed]
  12. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  13. Spek, A. L. (2009). Acta Cryst. D65, 148–155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  14. Stalhandske, C. (1981). Cryst. Struct. Commun. 10, 1081–1086.
  15. Videira, M., Silva, F., Paulo, A., Santos, I. C. & Santos, I. (2009). Inorg. Chim. Acta, 362, 2807–2813.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811016825/sj5135sup1.cif

e-67-o1359-sup1.cif (13.1KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811016825/sj5135Isup2.hkl

e-67-o1359-Isup2.hkl (79.2KB, hkl)

Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811016825/sj5135Isup3.cml

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES