Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2011 May 7;67(Pt 6):m718. doi: 10.1107/S1600536811016400

Diaqua­(2,2′-bipyridine-6,6′-dicarboxyl­ato)nickel(II)

Shui Hu a, ShiPeng Wen a, Huai-Ming Hu b,*, Li Liu a,*
PMCID: PMC3120548  PMID: 21754617

Abstract

In the title compound, [Ni(C12H6N2O4)(H2O)2], the NiII atom (site symmetry 2) displays a distorted cis-NiN2O4 octa­hedral coordination geometry with two N atoms and two O atoms of the tetra­dentate 2,2′-bipyridine-6,6′-dicarboxyl­ate ligand in the equatorial plane and two water mol­ecules in axial positions. The complete dianionic ligand is generated by crystallographic twofold symmetry. In the crystal, a two-dimensional supra­molecular structure parallel to (001) is formed through O—H⋯O hydrogen-bond inter­actions between the coordinated water mol­ecules and the O atoms of nearby carboxyl­ate groups.

Related literature

For transition metal complexes with the title ligand, see: Knight et al. (2006 ▶); Duan et al. (2009 ▶); Wang et al. (2009 ▶). For lanthanide metal complexes with the title ligand, see: Bunzli et al. (2000 ▶); Wang et al. (2010 ▶).graphic file with name e-67-0m718-scheme1.jpg

Experimental

Crystal data

  • [Ni(C12H6N2O4)(H2O)2]

  • M r = 336.93

  • Orthorhombic, Inline graphic

  • a = 7.1056 (9) Å

  • b = 11.3608 (15) Å

  • c = 15.3334 (19) Å

  • V = 1237.8 (3) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 1.60 mm−1

  • T = 296 K

  • 0.24 × 0.16 × 0.10 mm

Data collection

  • Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2005 ▶) T min = 0.766, T max = 0.857

  • 6269 measured reflections

  • 1274 independent reflections

  • 1098 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.036

Refinement

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.032

  • wR(F 2) = 0.082

  • S = 1.06

  • 1274 reflections

  • 102 parameters

  • 2 restraints

  • H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement

  • Δρmax = 0.48 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.23 e Å−3

Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2005 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2005 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL.

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811016400/hb5864sup1.cif

e-67-0m718-sup1.cif (15.4KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811016400/hb5864Isup2.hkl

e-67-0m718-Isup2.hkl (63.1KB, hkl)

Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811016400/hb5864Isup3.cdx

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Selected bond lengths (Å).

Ni1—N1 1.9975 (19)
Ni1—O3 2.0553 (18)
Ni1—O1 2.1335 (16)

Table 2. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A D⋯A D—H⋯A
O3—H3A⋯O2i 0.81 (2) 1.90 (2) 2.708 (2) 176 (3)
O3—H3B⋯O2ii 0.83 (2) 1.95 (2) 2.772 (3) 172 (3)

Symmetry codes: (i) Inline graphic; (ii) Inline graphic.

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

Pyridyl carboxylic acid is an important class of organic ligands and has been widely used in coordination chemistry. 2,2'-Bipyridine-6,6'-dicarboxylate ligand is coordinated woth transition metal (Duan et al., 2009; Knight et al., 2006 and Wang et al., 2009) and lanthanide metal ions (Bunzli et al., 2000 and Wang et al., 2010). Herein, we report crystal structure of a new nickel complex with 2,2'-bipyridine-6,6'-dicarboxylate ligand.

The atom-numbering scheme of (I) is shown in Fig. 1. The NiII atom displays a distorted octahedral coordination geometry with two N atoms and two O atoms of 2,2'-bipyridine-6,6'-dicarboxylate in equatorial plane and two water molecules in apical positions. A two-dimensional supramolecular structure is formed through hydrogen interactions between the oxygen atoms of coordination water molecules and the oxygen atoms of carboxylate groups [O3—H3A···O2i, 2.708 (3) Å, 176 (3) °, symmetric code i: (-x - 1/2, -y + 3/2, z); O3—H3B···O2ii, 2.772 (3) Å, 172 (3) °, symmetric code ii: (-x, y - 1/2, -z + 1/2)].

Experimental

The title compound was prepared by the reaction of Ni(NO3)2 with 2,2'-bipyridine-6,6'-dicarboxylic acid (H2bpdc) in a water solution. Ni(NO3)2.6H2O (0.2 mmol) and H2bpdc (0.2 mmol) were dissolved in 25 ml deionized water and adjusted the pH to 7 with 0.05 mol L-1 NaOH aqueous solution. After one week, green blocks were obtained. Elmental analysis for C12H10N2NiO6 calculated: C 42.78, H 2.99, N 8.32%; found: C 42.57, H 2.89, N 8.46%.

Refinement

The water H atoms were located in a difference Fourier map and refined with restrained O—H bond lengths [0.85 (2) Å] and fixed isotropic displancement parameters (Uiso(H) = 1.2 Ueq(O)). The carbon H atoms were placed at calculated positions (C—H = 0.93–0.96 Å) and refined as riding model with Uiso(H) = 1.2 Ueq(carrier).

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

The molecular structure of (I), showing 30% probability displacement ellipsoids. Atoms labelled with the suffix A are at the symmetry position (-x + 1/2, -y + 3/2, z).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

View of a two-dimensional supramolecular structure constructed through hydrogen bonding interactions in (I). Hydrogen atoms of carbon atoms have been omitted for clarity.

Crystal data

[Ni(C12H6N2O4)(H2O)2] F(000) = 688
Mr = 336.93 Dx = 1.808 Mg m−3
Orthorhombic, Pccn Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ab 2ac Cell parameters from 1650 reflections
a = 7.1056 (9) Å θ = 3.2–25.2°
b = 11.3608 (15) Å µ = 1.60 mm−1
c = 15.3334 (19) Å T = 296 K
V = 1237.8 (3) Å3 Block, green
Z = 4 0.24 × 0.16 × 0.10 mm

Data collection

Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer 1274 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube 1098 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphite Rint = 0.036
φ and ω scans θmax = 26.4°, θmin = 2.7°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2005) h = −8→8
Tmin = 0.766, Tmax = 0.857 k = −13→14
6269 measured reflections l = −10→19

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: full Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.032 Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.082 H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.06 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0405P)2 + 0.5888P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1274 reflections (Δ/σ)max < 0.001
102 parameters Δρmax = 0.48 e Å−3
2 restraints Δρmin = −0.23 e Å−3

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
Ni1 0.2500 0.7500 0.16327 (3) 0.02540 (16)
N1 0.0931 (3) 0.80137 (16) 0.06211 (12) 0.0285 (4)
O1 0.0167 (2) 0.83346 (15) 0.22531 (11) 0.0360 (4)
O2 −0.2446 (2) 0.93408 (18) 0.19595 (16) 0.0517 (6)
C1 −0.1035 (3) 0.8756 (2) 0.17424 (18) 0.0348 (6)
C2 −0.0683 (4) 0.8569 (2) 0.07707 (17) 0.0332 (6)
C3 −0.1808 (4) 0.8936 (2) 0.0083 (2) 0.0464 (7)
H3 −0.2934 0.9332 0.0182 0.056*
C4 −0.1204 (5) 0.8695 (3) −0.0750 (2) 0.0563 (9)
H4 −0.1951 0.8915 −0.1221 0.068*
C5 0.0486 (5) 0.8132 (2) −0.09017 (18) 0.0506 (8)
H5 0.0894 0.7982 −0.1467 0.061*
C6 0.1564 (4) 0.7796 (2) −0.01856 (16) 0.0348 (6)
O3 0.1216 (2) 0.58888 (16) 0.17647 (13) 0.0380 (5)
H3A 0.009 (3) 0.584 (3) 0.1803 (18) 0.046*
H3B 0.169 (4) 0.545 (2) 0.2135 (15) 0.046*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
Ni1 0.0254 (3) 0.0293 (3) 0.0215 (2) 0.00250 (16) 0.000 0.000
N1 0.0341 (11) 0.0256 (10) 0.0260 (11) −0.0004 (9) −0.0053 (9) −0.0005 (8)
O1 0.0336 (9) 0.0402 (10) 0.0343 (10) 0.0040 (8) 0.0046 (8) −0.0040 (8)
O2 0.0263 (10) 0.0466 (12) 0.0821 (15) 0.0055 (8) −0.0004 (9) −0.0232 (11)
C1 0.0248 (12) 0.0269 (12) 0.0526 (17) −0.0047 (10) 0.0005 (12) −0.0078 (11)
C2 0.0316 (13) 0.0217 (12) 0.0464 (16) −0.0021 (10) −0.0109 (11) −0.0021 (10)
C3 0.0437 (15) 0.0291 (14) 0.067 (2) −0.0016 (11) −0.0276 (15) 0.0050 (13)
C4 0.073 (2) 0.0378 (16) 0.059 (2) −0.0073 (15) −0.0407 (18) 0.0134 (14)
C5 0.085 (2) 0.0380 (16) 0.0289 (15) −0.0094 (16) −0.0177 (15) 0.0061 (11)
C6 0.0530 (17) 0.0261 (12) 0.0252 (12) −0.0045 (11) −0.0073 (12) 0.0018 (9)
O3 0.0259 (9) 0.0364 (10) 0.0519 (12) 0.0001 (8) 0.0044 (9) 0.0117 (8)

Geometric parameters (Å, °)

Ni1—N1i 1.9975 (19) C2—C3 1.387 (4)
Ni1—N1 1.9975 (19) C3—C4 1.375 (5)
Ni1—O3i 2.0553 (18) C3—H3 0.9300
Ni1—O3 2.0553 (18) C4—C5 1.381 (5)
Ni1—O1i 2.1335 (16) C4—H4 0.9300
Ni1—O1 2.1335 (16) C5—C6 1.392 (4)
N1—C2 1.329 (3) C5—H5 0.9300
N1—C6 1.339 (3) C6—C6i 1.491 (5)
O1—C1 1.254 (3) O3—H3A 0.806 (18)
O2—C1 1.247 (3) O3—H3B 0.827 (17)
C1—C2 1.526 (4)
N1i—Ni1—N1 78.11 (11) O2—C1—C2 117.8 (2)
N1i—Ni1—O3i 95.10 (8) O1—C1—C2 116.4 (2)
N1—Ni1—O3i 93.67 (8) N1—C2—C3 120.6 (3)
N1i—Ni1—O3 93.67 (8) N1—C2—C1 112.1 (2)
N1—Ni1—O3 95.10 (8) C3—C2—C1 127.3 (3)
O3i—Ni1—O3 168.70 (11) C4—C3—C2 117.8 (3)
N1i—Ni1—O1i 77.45 (7) C4—C3—H3 121.1
N1—Ni1—O1i 155.48 (8) C2—C3—H3 121.1
O3i—Ni1—O1i 90.40 (7) C3—C4—C5 121.4 (3)
O3—Ni1—O1i 84.56 (7) C3—C4—H4 119.3
N1i—Ni1—O1 155.48 (8) C5—C4—H4 119.3
N1—Ni1—O1 77.45 (7) C4—C5—C6 118.2 (3)
O3i—Ni1—O1 84.56 (7) C4—C5—H5 120.9
O3—Ni1—O1 90.40 (7) C6—C5—H5 120.9
O1i—Ni1—O1 127.04 (9) N1—C6—C5 119.5 (3)
C2—N1—C6 122.5 (2) N1—C6—C6i 112.53 (14)
C2—N1—Ni1 119.11 (17) C5—C6—C6i 127.93 (19)
C6—N1—Ni1 118.41 (17) Ni1—O3—H3A 121 (2)
C1—O1—Ni1 114.88 (15) Ni1—O3—H3B 115 (2)
O2—C1—O1 125.7 (3) H3A—O3—H3B 108 (3)
N1i—Ni1—N1—C2 −178.6 (2) Ni1—N1—C2—C3 −179.86 (17)
O3i—Ni1—N1—C2 −84.19 (18) C6—N1—C2—C1 −177.4 (2)
O3—Ni1—N1—C2 88.68 (18) Ni1—N1—C2—C1 1.8 (3)
O1i—Ni1—N1—C2 176.75 (16) O2—C1—C2—N1 175.2 (2)
O1—Ni1—N1—C2 −0.59 (17) O1—C1—C2—N1 −2.6 (3)
N1i—Ni1—N1—C6 0.53 (13) O2—C1—C2—C3 −3.1 (4)
O3i—Ni1—N1—C6 94.98 (18) O1—C1—C2—C3 179.2 (2)
O3—Ni1—N1—C6 −92.15 (18) N1—C2—C3—C4 0.6 (4)
O1i—Ni1—N1—C6 −4.1 (3) C1—C2—C3—C4 178.7 (2)
O1—Ni1—N1—C6 178.57 (19) C2—C3—C4—C5 −1.5 (4)
N1i—Ni1—O1—C1 3.7 (3) C3—C4—C5—C6 1.0 (4)
N1—Ni1—O1—C1 −0.96 (16) C2—N1—C6—C5 −1.6 (4)
O3i—Ni1—O1—C1 94.04 (17) Ni1—N1—C6—C5 179.24 (19)
O3—Ni1—O1—C1 −96.09 (17) C2—N1—C6—C6i 177.8 (2)
O1i—Ni1—O1—C1 −179.58 (17) Ni1—N1—C6—C6i −1.4 (3)
Ni1—O1—C1—O2 −175.4 (2) C4—C5—C6—N1 0.6 (4)
Ni1—O1—C1—C2 2.1 (3) C4—C5—C6—C6i −178.7 (3)
C6—N1—C2—C3 1.0 (4)

Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1/2, −y+3/2, z.

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
O3—H3A···O2ii 0.81 (2) 1.90 (2) 2.708 (2) 176 (3)
O3—H3B···O2iii 0.83 (2) 1.95 (2) 2.772 (3) 172 (3)

Symmetry codes: (ii) −x−1/2, −y+3/2, z; (iii) −x, y−1/2, −z+1/2.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: HB5864).

References

  1. Bruker (2005). APEX2, SAINT and SADABS Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  2. Bunzli, J.-C. G., Charbonniere, L. J. & Ziessel, R. F. (2000). J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. pp. 1917–1923.
  3. Duan, L., Fischer, A., Xu, Y. & Sun, L. (2009). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 10397–10399. [DOI] [PubMed]
  4. Knight, J. C., Amoroso, A. J., Edwards, P. G. & Ooi, L.-L. (2006). Acta Cryst. E62, m3306–m3308.
  5. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  6. Wang, H., Su, H., Xu, J., Bai, F. & Gao, Y. (2009). Acta Cryst. E65, m352–m353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  7. Wang, C., Wang, Z., Gu, F. & Guo, G. (2010). J. Mol. Struct. 979, 92–100.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811016400/hb5864sup1.cif

e-67-0m718-sup1.cif (15.4KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811016400/hb5864Isup2.hkl

e-67-0m718-Isup2.hkl (63.1KB, hkl)

Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811016400/hb5864Isup3.cdx

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES