Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2011 May 20;67(Pt 6):o1442. doi: 10.1107/S1600536811017703

2-[(Eth­oxy­carbonothio­yl)sulfan­yl]acetic acid

Shude Xiao a, Renpeng Gu a, Paul A Charpentier a,*
PMCID: PMC3120628  PMID: 21754819

Abstract

In the title compound, C5H8O3S2, the C—S and C—O bonds in the xanthate unit are shorter than those linked to it. In the crystal, inversion dimers linked by pairs of O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds occur.

Related literature

For general background to the synthesis and applications of the title compound, see: Stenzel et al. (2003); Moad et al. (2005, 2008). For its applications in polymerization, see: Coote & Radom (2004); Simms et al. (2005); Russum et al. (2005); Assem et al. (2007); Wang et al. (2010). For similar structures, see: Xiao & Charpentier (2010, 2011).graphic file with name e-67-o1442-scheme1.jpg

Experimental

Crystal data

  • C5H8O3S2

  • M r = 180.23

  • Monoclinic, Inline graphic

  • a = 4.7387 (2) Å

  • b = 14.7836 (8) Å

  • c = 11.9013 (6) Å

  • β = 100.845 (3)°

  • V = 818.86 (7) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 0.60 mm−1

  • T = 150 K

  • 0.08 × 0.03 × 0.03 mm

Data collection

  • Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (Blessing, 1995) T min = 0.952, T max = 0.982

  • 39762 measured reflections

  • 3582 independent reflections

  • 2343 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.092

Refinement

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.045

  • wR(F 2) = 0.111

  • S = 1.01

  • 3582 reflections

  • 93 parameters

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 0.31 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.37 e Å−3

Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2008); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2008); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL.

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811017703/ng5142sup1.cif

e-67-o1442-sup1.cif (12.7KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811017703/ng5142Isup2.hkl

e-67-o1442-Isup2.hkl (175.7KB, hkl)

Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811017703/ng5142Isup3.cml

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
O2—H2⋯O3i 0.84 1.81 2.645 (2) 175

Symmetry code: (i) Inline graphic.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Canadian Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) Idea to Innovation (I2I) Program. The authors are grateful to Aneta Borecki and Dr Guerman Popov in the Department of Chemistry of the University of Western Ontario for the XRD data acquisition and inter­pretation.

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

Reversible-deactivation radical polymerization (RDRP) of vinyl acetate (VAc) has been a challenge. Methyl 2-(ethoxycarbonothioylthio)acetate was investigated for reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) polymerization of VAc (Moad et al., 2005, 2008; Stenzel et al., 2003; Coote & Radom, 2004), and was successfully applied in emulsion polymerizations (Simms et al., 2005; Russum et al., 2005). Thanks to the similarity of the molecular structures, 2-(ethoxycarbonothioylthio)acetic acid not only provides a carboxylic acid functionality but also works as the RAFT-CTA for VAc in RDRP. This RAFT-CTA has also found applications in the RAFT polymerization of other monomers (Assem et al., 2007; Wang et al., 2010). Compounds of similar structures were reported previously (Xiao & Charpentier, 2010, 2011).

Experimental

Potassium O-ethyl dithiocarbonate 13.6 g was dissolved in THF 50 ml, and then mixed with 2-bromoacetic acid 6.9 g / THF 20 ml. The reaction was carried out at room temperature for 2 days. Excess hexanes was applied to the mixture and the precipitates were filtered off, followed by evaporating the solvents using a rotary evaporator. The light yellow oil was further purified by extraction and recrystallization with hexanes, and colorless crystals were obtained. m.p.: 56.4 °C(DSC). MS: 179.9917.

Refinement

The structure was solved and refined using the Bruker SHELXTL Software Package, using the space group P 1 21/n 1, with Z = 4 for the formula unit, C5H8O3S2. All of the non-hydrogen atoms were refined with anisotropic thermal parameters. The hydrogen atom positions were calculated geometrically and were included as riding on their respective carbon atoms. The final anisotropic full-matrix least-squares refinement on F2 with 93 variables converged at R1 = 4.54%, for the observed data and wR2 = 11.08% for all data. The goodness-of-fit was 1.005. The largest peak in the final difference electron density synthesis was 0.309 e-3 and the largest hole was -0.368 e-3 with an RMS deviation of 0.077 e-3. On the basis of the final model, the calculated density was 1.462 g/cm3 and F(000), 376 e-.

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

View of the title compound (50% probability displacement ellipsoids).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Packing diagram of the structure with H-bonds.

Crystal data

C5H8O3S2 F(000) = 376
Mr = 180.23 Dx = 1.462 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/n Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2yn Cell parameters from 4468 reflections
a = 4.7387 (2) Å θ = 2.2–25.6°
b = 14.7836 (8) Å µ = 0.60 mm1
c = 11.9013 (6) Å T = 150 K
β = 100.845 (3)° Cube, colourless
V = 818.86 (7) Å3 0.08 × 0.03 × 0.03 mm
Z = 4

Data collection

Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer 3582 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube 2343 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphite Rint = 0.092
φ and ω scans θmax = 35.0°, θmin = 2.2°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (Blessing, 1995) h = −7→7
Tmin = 0.952, Tmax = 0.982 k = −23→23
39762 measured reflections l = −19→18

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: full Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.045 Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.111 H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.01 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0294P)2 + 0.6076P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
3582 reflections (Δ/σ)max = 0.001
93 parameters Δρmax = 0.31 e Å3
0 restraints Δρmin = −0.37 e Å3

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
S1 −0.08173 (11) 0.19417 (3) 1.01439 (4) 0.02745 (11)
S2 −0.03755 (11) 0.25308 (3) 0.77468 (4) 0.03030 (12)
O1 0.1868 (3) 0.10724 (9) 0.88947 (11) 0.0300 (3)
O2 −0.3267 (3) 0.44372 (9) 0.93538 (13) 0.0329 (3)
H2 −0.2443 0.4941 0.9464 0.049*
O3 0.0854 (3) 0.39432 (9) 1.04203 (12) 0.0306 (3)
C1 0.4719 (6) −0.00588 (15) 0.8227 (2) 0.0510 (6)
H1A 0.6206 0.0051 0.8906 0.077*
H1B 0.5624 −0.0255 0.7592 0.077*
H1C 0.3409 −0.0531 0.8396 0.077*
C2 0.3067 (5) 0.07965 (13) 0.79013 (17) 0.0327 (4)
H2A 0.4352 0.1273 0.7699 0.039*
H2B 0.1508 0.0690 0.7234 0.039*
C3 0.0329 (4) 0.18315 (11) 0.88283 (14) 0.0236 (3)
C4 −0.3109 (4) 0.29105 (12) 0.98778 (16) 0.0276 (3)
H4A −0.4369 0.2837 0.9120 0.033*
H4B −0.4359 0.2923 1.0457 0.033*
C5 −0.1604 (4) 0.38094 (12) 0.98990 (14) 0.0239 (3)

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
S1 0.0365 (2) 0.02475 (19) 0.02263 (19) −0.00361 (17) 0.00955 (16) 0.00040 (15)
S2 0.0354 (3) 0.0337 (2) 0.02195 (19) −0.00021 (19) 0.00584 (17) 0.00340 (16)
O1 0.0375 (7) 0.0262 (6) 0.0284 (6) 0.0002 (5) 0.0118 (5) 0.0004 (5)
O2 0.0272 (7) 0.0267 (6) 0.0423 (8) 0.0001 (5) 0.0000 (6) −0.0006 (6)
O3 0.0266 (6) 0.0272 (6) 0.0356 (7) −0.0025 (5) −0.0001 (5) 0.0014 (5)
C1 0.0734 (18) 0.0294 (10) 0.0603 (15) 0.0068 (11) 0.0385 (14) −0.0004 (10)
C2 0.0384 (11) 0.0299 (9) 0.0332 (9) −0.0048 (8) 0.0151 (8) −0.0068 (7)
C3 0.0242 (8) 0.0242 (7) 0.0228 (7) −0.0060 (6) 0.0050 (6) −0.0028 (6)
C4 0.0259 (8) 0.0298 (9) 0.0289 (8) −0.0038 (7) 0.0098 (7) −0.0011 (7)
C5 0.0237 (8) 0.0269 (8) 0.0223 (7) −0.0011 (6) 0.0075 (6) −0.0020 (6)

Geometric parameters (Å, °)

S1—C3 1.7588 (17) C1—H1A 0.9800
S1—C4 1.789 (2) C1—H1B 0.9800
S2—C3 1.6356 (18) C1—H1C 0.9800
O1—C3 1.332 (2) C2—H2A 0.9900
O1—C2 1.463 (2) C2—H2B 0.9900
O2—C5 1.308 (2) C4—C5 1.506 (2)
O2—H2 0.8400 C4—H4A 0.9900
O3—C5 1.228 (2) C4—H4B 0.9900
C1—C2 1.499 (3)
C3—S1—C4 101.27 (9) H2A—C2—H2B 108.6
C3—O1—C2 118.58 (14) O1—C3—S2 127.40 (13)
C5—O2—H2 109.5 O1—C3—S1 106.40 (12)
C2—C1—H1A 109.5 S2—C3—S1 126.20 (11)
C2—C1—H1B 109.5 C5—C4—S1 115.70 (13)
H1A—C1—H1B 109.5 C5—C4—H4A 108.4
C2—C1—H1C 109.5 S1—C4—H4A 108.4
H1A—C1—H1C 109.5 C5—C4—H4B 108.4
H1B—C1—H1C 109.5 S1—C4—H4B 108.4
O1—C2—C1 106.83 (17) H4A—C4—H4B 107.4
O1—C2—H2A 110.4 O3—C5—O2 124.18 (16)
C1—C2—H2A 110.4 O3—C5—C4 123.47 (16)
O1—C2—H2B 110.4 O2—C5—C4 112.25 (15)
C1—C2—H2B 110.4

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
O2—H2···O3i 0.84 1.81 2.645 (2) 175

Symmetry codes: (i) −x, −y+1, −z+2.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: NG5142).

References

  1. Assem, Y., Chaffey-Millar, H., Barner-Kowollik, C., Wegner, G. & Agarwal, S. (2007). Macromolecules, 40, 3907–3913.
  2. Blessing, R. H. (1995). Acta Cryst. A51, 33–38. [DOI] [PubMed]
  3. Bruker (2008). APEX2 and SAINT Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  4. Coote, M. L. & Radom, L. (2004). Macromolecules, 37, 590–596.
  5. Moad, G., Rizzardo, E. & Thang, S. H. (2005). Aust. J. Chem. 58, 379–410.
  6. Moad, G., Rizzardo, E. & Thang, S. H. (2008). Polymer, 49, 1079–1131.
  7. Russum, J. P., Barbre, N. D., Jones, C. W. & Schork, F. J. (2005). J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 43, 2188–2193.
  8. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  9. Simms, R. W., Davis, T. P. & Cunningham, M. F. (2005). Macromol. Rapid Commun. 26, 592–596.
  10. Stenzel, M. H., Cummins, L., Roberts, G. E., Davis, T. P., Vana, P. & Barner-Kowollik, C. (2003). Macromol. Chem. Phys. 204, 1160–1168.
  11. Wang, W., Wang, D., Li, B. & Zhu, S. (2010). CN Patent 101693749.
  12. Xiao, S. & Charpentier, P. A. (2010). Acta Cryst. E66, o3103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  13. Xiao, S. & Charpentier, P. A. (2011). Acta Cryst. E67, o575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811017703/ng5142sup1.cif

e-67-o1442-sup1.cif (12.7KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811017703/ng5142Isup2.hkl

e-67-o1442-Isup2.hkl (175.7KB, hkl)

Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811017703/ng5142Isup3.cml

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES