Abstract
We screened and spoligotyped 150 consecutive phenotypically confirmed extensively drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis (XDR-TB) isolates (January 2008 to March 2009) for rifampin, isoniazid, fluoroquinolone, and aminoglycoside resistance targeting rpoB, inhA, katG, gyrA, gyrB, and rrs. Mutations predominant among XDR-TB were S315T (katG) (100% of isolates), S531L (rpoB) (97% of isolates), D94G (gyrA) (53% of isolates), and A1401G (rrs) (71% of isolates). Spoligotyping revealed 62% of the isolates to be Beijing.
The worldwide emergence of extensively drug resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis (XDR-TB) is a major setback to tuberculosis (TB) control (10, 11, 12, 15). XDR-TB, defined as multidrug resistant (MDR) M. tuberculosis (i.e., resistant to rifampin and isoniazid) with additional resistance to any fluoroquinolone (FQ) and to any one of three s-line injectables, i.e., capreomycin, kanamycin, or amikacin (20).
The mycobacteriology laboratory of P. D. Hinduja National Hospital (PDHNH), a tertiary care center in central Mumbai, received 7,482 clinical specimens for TB culture using a mycobacterial growth indicator tube (MGIT) and Lowenstein-Jensen medium (LJ) from January 2008 to March 2009. Our laboratory has a referral bias toward nonresponders, as we mainly receive treatment failures and complicated TB cases and drug susceptibility testing (DST) is performed only on request. A total of 3,899 samples were positive for the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex, and 2,522 patients requested DST, of which 1,640 (65%) were MDR and 150 (9.1%) were XDR-TB by the MGIT (19). We studied mutations targeting the genes conferring resistance to drugs included in the definition of XDR-TB (inhA, katG, rpoB, and gyrA [1, 5, 8, 10, 14, 22, 27] and gyrB and rrs [2, 16, 28]) and fingerprinted these patients' isolates by spoligotyping (6). DNA extraction from pure culture was performed by the cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB-NaCl) method (23). A single tube touchdown multiplex PCR for three target genes associated with resistance to isoniazid (inhA and katG) and rifampin (rpoB) was done and screened for mutations using an in-house reverse line blot hybridization (RLBH) assay (21). The screening of katG resulted in the identification of G315C (100%), the S315T mutation in katG (Table 1) conferring high-level resistance to isoniazid with an altered catalase-peroxidase activity (24). Twenty-one (14%) of these isolates showed the C15T mutation in the promoter region of the inhA gene in addition to the katG mutation. The promoter mutation was also seen among XDR-TB isolates in Portugal (18) and China (25). The S531L mutation in rpoB was more prevalent, observed in 146 (97%) of these isolates, whereas the H526Y mutation was observed only in 4 (3%) of the isolates. A previous study from this center (21) on MDR isolates revealed an array of point mutations from position 511 to position 531 in rpoB; however, the S531L mutation in rpoB dominated among XDR-TB isolates. This is similar to what was found in a study from Portugal (18), where the S531L mutation dominated in XDR-TB.
Table 1.
Frequency of mutations in the various genes observed among our 150 XDR-TB isolates
| Drug(s) | Gene(s) | Mutation(s) seen | Amino acid change | No. (%) of isolates |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Isoniazid | katG | G315C | S315T | 150 (100) |
| Isoniazid | inhA | C-15T | 21 (14) | |
| Rifampin | rpoB | C531T | S531L | 146 (97) |
| Rifampin | rpoB | A526G | H526Y | 4 (3) |
| Fluoroquinolones | ||||
| Ofloxacin | gyrA | C90T | A90V | 37 (25) |
| Ofloxacin, moxifloxacin | gyrA | T91C | S91P | 2 (1) |
| Ofloxacin, moxifloxacin | gyrA | A94G | D94G | 79 (53) |
| Ofloxacin, moxifloxacin | gyrA | A94C | D94A | 18 (12) |
| Ofloxacin, moxifloxacin | gyrA | G94A | D94N | 14 (9) |
| Aminoglycosides | ||||
| Kanamycin, amikacin | rrs | A1401G | 106 (71) | |
| Kanamycin, amikacin, capreomycin | rrs | G1484T | 42 (28) | |
| Capreomycin (n = 42) | tlyA, rrs | A205G plus G1484T | K69E | 13 (31) |
| Capreomycin (n = 42) | tlyA, rrs | Deletion of T at nt 674 plus G1484T | Frameshift | 3 (7) |
Novel primers were designed to amplify a 350-bp region of gyrA, a 550-bp region of gyrB for fluoroquinolone resistance, and a 500-bp region of rrs (codons 1401 to 1484) for aminoglycoside resistance. The initial 50 amplified products were analyzed for bidirectional sequencing, and after mutation confirmation, 100 subsequent products were sent for unidirectional sequencing (Chromous Biotech Pvt., Ltd., Bangalore, India). DNA sequencing of the gyrA gene showed the presence of the D94G mutation in 79 (53%) isolates phenotypically resistant to ofloxacin and moxifloxacin, while the A90V mutation was observed in 37 (25%) isolates that were phenotypically sensitive to moxifloxacin but resistant to ofloxacin. This needs to be verified with the MIC at higher drug concentrations for ofloxacin (13). The D94G mutation at the 94th codon showed a high frequency, i.e., 53% among our isolates. Other mutations at the 94th codon, D94A and D94N, were found in 12% and 9% of the isolates, respectively. Other studies (18, 25) also show similar mutations in gyrA. All isolates were sequenced for gyrB mutations, but only one isolate phenotypically resistant to both ofloxacin and moxifloxacin showed an N510D mutation in gyrB in addition to the D94G mutation in gyrA. Sequencing of the rrs gene revealed the presence of the A1401G mutation in 106 (71%) isolates that were phenotypically resistant to kanamycin and amikacin. Cross-resistance between the two aminoglycosides kanamycin and amikacin is believed to exist (2, 16, 26, 28). Forty-two (28%) isolates phenotypically resistant to capreomycin in addition to kanamycin and amikacin showed the presence of a G1484T mutation, whereas other studies (18, 25) have reported several point mutations in the rrs gene in addition to the A1401G and G1484T mutations.
For capreomycin-resistant isolates, the tlyA gene (17) that was split in two parts (tlyA-1 [500 bp] and tlyA-2 [300 bp]) was amplified using novel primers. The amplified products were sent for bidirectional sequencing. Of the 42 capreomycin-resistant isolates sequenced for tlyA in addition to rrs, 13 (31%) isolates showed A205G (K69E) and 3 isolates showed deletion of T at nucleotide (nt) 674, resulting in a frameshift mutation. The remaining 26 isolates showed the G1484T mutation in the rrs gene only, with no tlyA mutation. Two isolates that were phenotypically resistant to kanamycin, amikacin, and capreomycin did not show any mutation in the rrs gene. This could be due to mutations in other hot spot regions that were not targeted in this study.
Fingerprinting of all isolates was performed by spoligotyping (6), and the pattern was compared to that in an international spoligotyping database (SpolDB4) (7, 29). The spoligotype pattern revealed that the Beijing genotype was predominant among XDR-TB isolates, which accounted for 62% of all the isolates, followed by the Central Asian (CAS) genotype (14%), and the T families, i.e., T1 (13%), East African-Indian family 5 (EAI5) (7%), and EAI 3 (2%). There were three single isolates that each belonged to family 35 (as assigned by the Spotclust database, which uses a computer algorithm based on studies from SpolDB3 [9]), T4, and the Haarlem genotype (Table 2). The sharing of a single spoligotype by 62% of the isolates suggests an important role for transmission of a dominant resistant clone. Spoligotyping studies from Mumbai have shown other genotypes, i.e., CAS and Manu1, to be predominant (4), whereas a previous study from our center (3) has reported a high proportion of Beijing strains among resistant cases. However, the results of the present study should not be overinterpreted, as sampling bias cannot be ruled out, due to the nonresponders referred to our center. Epidemiological associations between patients could not be ascertained, as patients were not residents from the same locality or workplace, and 119/150 (79%) were on second-line drugs for durations of more than 1 year.
Table 2.
Spoligotyping pattern of the 150 XDR-TB isolates
| Serial no. | Octal code | Spoligotype | No. (%) of isolates with the genotype |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 000000000003771 | Beijing | 94 (62) |
| 2 | 703777740003771 | CAS | 21 (14) |
| 3 | 377777777760771 | T1 | 19 (13) |
| 4 | 737777777413371 | EAI5 | 10 (6.7) |
| 5 | 477777777413071 | EAI3 | 3 (2) |
| 6 | 703600000000771 | Family 35 | 1 (0.6) |
| 7 | 757777774020771 | Haarlem1 | 1 (0.6) |
| 8 | 777760057760771 | T4 | 1 (0.6) |
Thus, mutational analysis could conclusively predict 100% resistance to isoniazid, rifampin, and fluoroquinolone and 98% resistance to aminoglycosides among our XDR-TB cohort.
Acknowledgments
The study was funded by the National Health and Education Society, P. D. Hinduja National Hospital and Medical Research Centre, Mumbai, India. We have no potential conflict of interest relevant to the contents of the manuscript.
The study has been approved by the Institutional Review Board of P. D. Hinduja National Hospital and Medical Research Centre, Mumbai. India.
Footnotes
Published ahead of print on 2 February 2011.
REFERENCES
- 1. Alangaden G., Manavathu E., Vakulenko S., Zvonok N., Lerner S. 1995. Characterization of fluoroquinolone resistant mutant strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis selected in the laboratory and isolated from patients. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 39:1700–1703 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Alangaden G., et al. 1998. Mechanism of resistance to amikacin and kanamycin in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42:1295–1297 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Almeida D., et al. 2005. High incidence of the Beijing genotype among multidrugresistant isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in a tertiary care center in Mumbai, India. Clin. Infect. Dis. 40:881–886 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Arora J., et al. 2009. Characterization of predominant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains from different subpopulations of India. Infect. Genet. Evol. 9:832–839 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Aubry A., et al. 2006. Novel gyrase mutation in quinolone resistant and hypersusceptible clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: functional analysis of mutant enzymes. Antimicrob. Agents. Chemother. 50:104–112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Boer M., Zanden A., Soolingen D. 2004. Simultaneous detection and typing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex bacteria. Clin. Lab. Int. http://www.cli-online.com/fileadmin/pdf/datasheet/simultaneous-detection-and-typing-of-mycobacterium-tuberculosis-complex-bacteria.pdf
- 7. Brudey K., et al. 2006. Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex genetic diversity: mining the fourth international spoligotyping database (SpolDB4) for classification, population genetics and epidemiology. BMC Microbiol. 1471:6–23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Cheng A., et al. 2004. Multiplex PCR amplimer conformation analysis of rapid detection of gyrA mutations in fluroquinolone resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48:596–601 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Eldholm V., et al. 2006. A first insight into the genetic diversity of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, assessed by spoligotyping. BMC Microbiol. 76(6):1–7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Elsevier 2006. XDR-TB—TB—a global threat. Lancet 368:964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Gandhi N. R., et al. 2006. Extensively drug resistant tuberculosis as a cause of death in patients' co-infected with tuberculosis and HIV in a rural area of South Africa. Lancet 368:1575–1580 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Gupta A., Espinal M., Raviglione M. 2001. Should tuberculosis programmes invest in second-line treatments for multi drug resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB). Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 12:1078–1079 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Kam K. M., et al. 2006. Stepwise decrease in moxifloxacin susceptibility amongst clinical isolates of multidrug resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis: correlation with ofloxacin susceptibility. Microb. Drug Resist. 12:7–11 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Kocagoz T., et al. 1996. Gyrase mutations in laboratory selected fluoroquinolone resistant mutants of mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Ra. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40:1768–1774 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. LoBue P. 2009. Extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 22:167–173 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Maus C., Plikaytis B., Shinnick T. 2005. Molecular analysis of cross resistance to capreomycin, kanamycin, amikacin, and viomycin in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49:3192–3197 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Maus C., Plikaytis B., Shinnick T. 2005. Mutation of tlyA confers capreomycin resistance in mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49:571–577 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Perdigao J., et al. 2010. Genetic analysis of extensively drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains in Lisbon, Portugal. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 65:224–227 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Rodrigues C., et al. 2008. Drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis against second line drugs using the Bactec MGIT 960 System. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 12:1449–1455 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Shah S., et al. 2007. Worldwide emergence of extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 13:380–387 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Shenai S, Rodrigues C., Mehta A. 2009. Rapid speciation of 15 clinically relevant mycobacteria with simultaneous detection of resistance to rifampicin, isoniazid and streptomycin in Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 13:46–58 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Shi R., Zhang J., Li C., Kazumi Y., Sugawara I. 2006. Emergence of ofloxacin resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates from China as determined by gyrA mutation analysis using denaturing high-pressure liquid chromatography and DNA sequencing. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44:4566–4568 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Somerville W., Thibert L., Schwartzman K., Behr M. 2005. Extraction of Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA: a question of containment. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43:2996–2997 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Somoskovi A., Parsons L., Salfinger M. 2001. The molecular basis of resistance to isoniazid, rifampicin, and pyrazinamide in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Respir. Res. 2:164–168 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Sun Z., et al. 2008. Characterization of extensively drug resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates in China. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46:4075–4077 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Suzuki Y., et al. 1998. Detection of kanamycin resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis by identifying mutations in the 16S rRNA gene. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:1220–1225 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Takiff H., et al. 1994. Cloning and nucleotide sequence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis gyrA and gyrB genes and detection of quinolone resistance mutations. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 38:773–780 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Tsukamura M., Mizuno S. 1975. Cross resistant relationships among the aminoglycoside antibiotics in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Gen. Microbiol. 88:269–274 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. van Soolingen D., Hermans P. W., Dehaas P. E., Soll D. R., van Embden J. D. 1991. Occurrence and stability of insertion sequences in Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex strains: evaluation of an insertion sequence-dependent DNA polymorphism as a tool in the epidemiology of tuberculosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 29:2578–2586 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
