Skip to main content
PMC home page
Elsevier Sponsored Documents logoLink to Elsevier Sponsored Documents
. 2011 Apr;157(1-4):111–115. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2011.01.010

Sequence characterization of a Peruvian isolate of Sweet potato chlorotic stunt virus: Further variability and a model for p22 acquisition

Wilmer J Cuellar a, Regina K Cruzado b, Segundo Fuentes a, Milton Untiveros b, Maria Soto c, Jan F Kreuze b,⁎
PMCID: PMC3125117  PMID: 21262288

Abstract

Sweet potato chlorotic stunt virus (SPCSV) is probably the most important virus infecting sweetpotato worldwide, causing severe synergistic disease complexes with several co-infecting viruses. To date only one isolate (Ug), corresponding to the EA strain has been completely sequenced. It was later shown to be unusual in that, in contrast to most isolates, it encoded an additional p22 protein at the 3′ end of RNA1. We report the complete sequence and genome organization of a Peruvian isolate of SPCSV (m2-47) as determined by siRNA deep sequencing. We confirm that the ORF encoding p22 is lacking from m2-47 and all tested Peruvian and South American isolates, whereas additional isolates containing p22 were identified from Uganda. Other potentially important genomic differences such as two small ORFs encoding putative small hydrophobic proteins instead of one, upstream the hsp70h gene and a more divergent sequence at its RNA1 3′-UTR in contrast to SPCSV isolates that contain p22 are discussed and a model for recent acquisition of p22 in Uganda is proposed. A role for p22 as a pathogenicity enhancer of SPCSV is also provided by complementary expression of p22 in transgenic sweetpotato plants.

Keywords: Crinivirus, SPCSV, p22, Sweetpotato, Evolution

Sweet potato chlorotic stunt virus (SPCSV) is a bipartite member of the family Closteroviridae, genus Crinivirus. It is phloem-limited, whitefly transmitted and among the largest of the single-stranded positive-sense RNA viruses with a total genome size of ∼17.6 kbp (Dolja et al., 2006; Kreuze et al., 2002). SPCSV has a worldwide distribution including the main sweetpotato production areas of the crop in Africa and the Americas (Gibson et al., 1998; Gutierrez et al., 2003; Kokkinos and Clark, 2006; Valverde and Moreira, 2004) and severe diseases have been associated with mixed infections with SPCSV in Africa (Gibson et al., 1998; Mukasa et al., 2006), Israel (Milgram et al., 1996), Central America (Valverde and Moreira, 2004) and South America (Di Feo et al., 2000; Gutierrez et al., 2003). Experimentally these mixed viral infections are characterized by an accumulation of only the co-infecting virus or viruses. The most dramatic example is the disease caused by the interaction of SPCSV with the potyvirus Sweet potato feathery mottle virus (SPFMV; Potyvirus) which causes ‘sweetpotato virus disease’ (SPVD), the economically most important disease of this crop, associated with yield losses of >60% (Gibson et al., 1998; Gutierrez et al., 2003; Untiveros et al., 2007). SPCSV can be distinguished into two distantly related strains EA and WA based on serology and nucleotide sequence data (Hoyer et al., 1996b, Vetten et al., 1996; Tairo et al., 2005). Only one complete genome of SPCSV has been sequenced so far, corresponding to isolate Ug of the EA strain (Kreuze et al., 2002).

Interestingly, partial sequence analyses of other strains suggest that the genome of Ug isolate is unusual in that it contains a p22 ORF at the 3′ end of RNA1 (Cuellar et al., 2008). Isolates showing a similar genome organization to Ug, which we hereby designate strain EAp22, have so far been reported only from Uganda while isolates lacking p22 and corresponding to both EA and WA strains have been reported in Peru, Israel, and Tanzania, suggesting that the latter is more widely distributed (Cuellar et al., 2008). Another unusual feature of the Ug isolate is that, unlike other criniviruses, the 3′-UTR of RNA1 and RNA2 are almost identical (99%).

The protein encoded by p22 has been shown to have RNA silencing suppression (RSS) activity (Kreuze et al., 2005) and was able to transiently increase viral titers of SPFMV after inoculation in sweetpotato (Cuellar et al., 2009). In Nicotiana benthamiana, p22 induces local necrosis when ectopically expressed in leaves by agroinfiltration and systemic necrosis when expressed from a viral vector (Kreuze et al., 2002). RNA silencing has a role in virus defense in plants (Baulcombe, 2004) and p22 may thus increase the severity of symptoms and virus interactions involving SPCSV. Indeed, co-infection of SPFMV with SPCSV isolates containing p22 cause more severe symptoms (systemic necrosis) than co-infection of SPFMV with SPCSV isolates lacking p22 in the indicator plant Ipomoea setosa (Cuellar et al., 2008). However, because isolates involved in these experiments have not been sequenced it cannot be excluded that this is caused by other factors than the p22 gene.

Together with isolate Ug, isolate m2-47 is commonly used in experimental studies of viral synergisms in sweetpotato (Cuellar et al., 2009; Untiveros et al., 2007). In this study we determine the complete genome sequence of m2-47 isolate (Genbank ID: HQ291259 for RNA1 and HQ291260 for RNA2), confirming the absence of p22 and also identifying other potentially important genomic differences. Through complementary expression in a transgenic plant we show evidence for a role of p22 in the pathogenicity of SPCSV. We further show that p22 is lacking from all available Peruvian and South American isolates and provide a model as to the mode of acquisition of p22.

SPCSV m2-47 was originally isolated from severely diseased sweetpotato plants growing in the Cañete valley of the southern coast of Lima by whitefly transmission on the indicator plant I. setosa (Gutierrez et al., 2003) and maintained by lateral grafting in an insect-proof greenhouse. Additional isolates used in this work (Table 1, samples 1–7) were isolated in the same way. Indicator plants were tested by NCM-ELISA for SPFMV, Sweet potato virus G (SPVG, Potyvirus), Sweet potato virus 2 (SPV2, Potyvirus), Sweet potato latent virus (SPLV, Potyvirus), Sweet potato mild mottle virus (SPMMV; Ipomovirus), Sweet potato mild speckling virus (SPMSV), Sweet potato chlorotic fleck (SPCFV, Carlavirus), C-6 virus, Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV, Cucumovirus) and Sweet potato caulimo-like virus (SPCV, Caulimoviridae) to confirm their absence. The plants were also checked to confirm the absence of begomoviruses by PCR (Li et al., 2004). Isolates 8–19 (Table 1; Untiveros et al., 2008) were maintained in sweetpotato and analyses were done on total RNA from these samples. Total RNA was isolated from 400 mg fresh Ipomoea leaves using Trizol (Invitrogen) following the manufacturer's instructions. RNA was resuspended in 250 μl sterile Milli-Q water (Sigma–Aldrich). The amount and quality of the RNA were checked using a spectrophotometer (Nanodrop, Thermo Scientific) and agarose gel electrophoresis. For isolate m2-47, RNA was lyophilized and sent to Fasteris Life Sciences SA (Plan-les-Ouates, Switzerland) for processing and high throughput sequencing (deep sequencing) on the Illumina Genome Analyzer II and short RNA viral sequences were assembled in silico using the programs Velvet and MAQ (http://maq.sourceforge.net) as previously described (Kreuze et al., 2009). Partial sequences of SPCSV isolates from Kisoro and Masaka were determined in a similar way, except that they were sent as a batch RNA prep with several other samples. To verify the integrity of the m2-47 genome assembled in silico, overlapping PCR products covering the span of the SPCSV genome were amplified using specifically designed primers and cloned using the pGEM-T easy cloning system (Promega) and Escherichia coli DH5α chemically competent cells. The sequence of two or more clones obtained from independent PCR reactions were confirmed by Sanger sequencing (Macrogen). Extension of these contigs, including sequences obtained by RT-PCR, was done using the program ContigExpress included in the Vector NTI package (Invitrogen). Transmembrane helices in p6 proteins were predicted with the TMHMM program (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TMHMM-2.0/) as previously described (Kreuze et al., 2002). Phylogenetic analyses were performed using the MEGA4 package (Kumar et al., 2008). To confirm the distinct 3′-UTR of RNA1 of m2-47 it was amplified using a custom RLM-RACE protocol as follows: ∼5 μg of RNA was incubated with 100 μM of Modban linker (5′rAppCTG TAG GCA CCA TCA AAT/3ddC/3′; IDT), 40 U of RNaseOUT (Invitrogen), 1x T4 RNA ligation buffer in a total volume of 20 μl and heated at 65 °C for 5 min. The reaction was then transferred to ice, 20 U of T4 RNA ligase (NEB) were added and incubated at 20 °C for 4 h. Then 7.5 μl of the RNA ligation mix was used for reverse transcription with the BanOne primer (5′-ATT GAT GGT GCC TAC AG-3′) and Superscript III reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturers recommendations at 50 °C for 55 min, followed by denaturation at 70 °C for 10 min and a treatment with 10 U of RNaseH (Invitrogen) at 37 °C for 20 min. Five microliters of the cDNA mix was then used for 35 cycles of PCR amplification using the BanOne and P7-F (5′-TTG ATG TGG CIC TAC TTT GGT-3′) primers with Platinum® Taq polymerase (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturers recommendations. A specific fragment of the expected size of ∼310 bp was obtained, purified from gel, cloned into E. coli and sent for Sanger sequencing as described above. To determine the RNA1 and RNA2 3′-UTRs of remaining SPCSV isolates (Table 1), RNA from all samples were reverse-transcribed in a reaction mix (20 μl) containing 200 ng random hexamer primers, 10 mM dithiothreitol, 0.5 mM dNTPs, 20 U RNasin (Promega) and 400 U M-MLV reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen) at 37 °C for 1 h. The reaction was stopped by heating at 70 °C for 10 min and diluted fivefold with sterile water. Five microliters of the reaction (cDNA) was used as template for PCR using primers P7-F or SPCSV2-7242: (5′-ATT GAT GAG AAA TAA GCA CCG C-3′) and Crini-3UTR-R: (5′-TTT TTG AGI TTT TAI AAT ACA CAC-3′) flanking the p22 insertion region. Samples lacking p22 produced a band of ∼250 bp. We confirmed the identity of the band of all isolates by restriction digestion (not shown) and of two EA and EAp22 isolates each by sequencing (Table 1). The 5′ region of RNA2 was also amplified and sequenced from seven isolates (Table 1) to confirm the presence of the p6-SHP (see below) using the primers SPCSV2-44f (5′-TAA GCT CGT ATC ATT GGT TGT CGT CA-3′) and SPCSV2-1046r (5′-GAC CTT CAT CGT ACC CCC GAC-3′). To study a possible role of p22 during SPCSV infection we used non-transgenic and p22-expressing (under control of the phloem specific RolC promoter) transgenic sweetpotato lines of cultivar ‘Huachano’ (Cuellar et al., 2009) and quantified the accumulation of m2-47 by triple antibody sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (TAS-ELISA) (Karyeija et al., 2000).

Table 1.

Sweet potato chlorotic stunt virus isolates used in this study and sequence accession numbers. Strain was determined by serology using antiserum MAb mix 1 and mix 2 (Gutierrez et al., 2003) for isolates 1–19 and by sequence analysis of hsp70h for isolates 20 and 21. Presence or absence of p22 was determined by PCR-RFLP as described in materials and methods and confirmed by sequencing in selected cases.

SPCSV Isolate Origin Strain p22 RNA1 3′-UTR RNA2 3′-UTR RNA2 5′-UTR
(1) m2-47 Cañete, Peru EA NO HQ291259 HQ291260 HQ291260
(2) Set2 San Ramon, Peru EA NO
(3) Set4 San Ramon, Peru EA NO
(4) Pelotas Pelotas, Brazil WA NO
(5) EL El Indio, Argentina WA NO HQ847524
(6) Arg Cordoba, Argentina WA NO HQ847529 HQ847534
(7) Africa10 Kenya EA NO HQ847523
(8) SR San Ramon, Peru EA NO
(9) Fe Ferreñafe, Peru EA NO
(10) Fio Cañete, Peru EA NO HQ847528 HQ847533 HQ847522
(11) KmtMil Cañete, Peru EA NO
(11) m2-41 Cañete, Peru EA NO
(12) m2-44 Cañete, Peru EA NO
(13) m2-63 Cañete, Peru EA NO
(14) C14 Cañete, Peru EA NO
(15) C18 Cañete, Peru EA NO
(16) C21 Cañete, Peru EA NO
(17) Hua Huaral, Peru EA NO HQ847520
(18) Chi4 Chimbote, Peru EA NO HQ847527 HQ847532 HQ847521
(19) Chi2 Chimbote, Peru EA NO
(20) KSR675 Kisoro, Uganda EA YES HQ847530 HQ847535 HQ847525
(21) Bitambi Masaka, Uganda EA YES HQ847531 HQ847536 HQ847526
Open in a new tab

The genome of SPCSV m2-47 consisted of approximately 8637nt for RNA1 and 8219nt for RNA2 and shared a total nt sequence identity of 98% with isolate Ug. The genome organization of m2-47 isolate differed from that of isolate Ug in three main ways (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Open in a new tab

(A) Schematic representation and comparison of Sweet potato chlorotic stunt virus genome organization of isolates m2-47 and Ug. Percentage values represent the identity at nucleotide level for each ORF; proteins identities are given behind the slash if different from nucleotide. * includes 3nt/1aa deletion in the CP of isolate m2-47. Different patterns of shading at the terminal parts of the genomes of both isolates represent differences in sequence conservation at these regions. There is a second ORF encoding a putative protein with transmembrane domain (p6-SHP) in m2-47 and the six other isolates (Table 1) sequenced in this region, the percentages shown correspond to its comparison with the same region in isolate Ug, except that a single nucleotide change (A575 → T) interrupts the p6-SHP in Ug (indicated by a question mark). The p6 is absent from isolates (Africa10 and Bitambi) and is indicated by dotted lines. Arrows show a suggested route for p22 acquisition, with roman numerals indicating a suggested sequence of steps giving origin to p22 in isolate Ug. A question mark indicates the unknown source of p22. (B) Alignment of the 3′-UTRs of EA and EAp22 isolates characterized in this study (Table 1) highlighting the dissimilarity in this region. The bold line above the alignment on the left indicates the region of RNA1-3′-UTR sequenced previously for other isolates lacking p22 (Cuellar et al., 2008), and nucleotides conserved between those and m2-47 are indicated with an asterisk. Arrows below the alignment indicate conserved secondary structure of the 3′-UTR found in all criniviruses; stop codons of the 3′ terminal ORFs are indicated by boxes. The last 10 nts of m2-47 RNA2 were not sequenced.

The absence of a p22 gene in RNA1: Northern blot results using a probe for RNase3 (not shown) and previous partial sequence characterization of SPCSV m2-47 indicating the absence of p22 (Cuellar et al., 2008) is confirmed in this work. Results herein also indicate that p22-containing isolates are not common in other regions of South America (Table 1). In contrast, RNA samples collected from infected sweetpotatoes collected in the districts of Kisoro and Masaka in Uganda contained p22. Isolates of EAp22 have so far been reported only in the Mpigi province in Uganda (Cuellar et al., 2008; Kreuze et al., 2002). The presence of p22 in isolates from other districts in Uganda further suggests that EAp22 is more common than previously known (Cuellar et al., 2008). Furthermore, the suspected presence in Kenya of isolates lacking p22 (Hoyer et al., 1996a) is confirmed in this study (isolate Africa10, Table 1).

An additional ORF encoding a small hydrophobic protein (SHP) upstream the hsp70h gene: Isolates m2-47 and Ug contain a p6 gene at the 5′ end of RNA2 showing 100% nt and aa identity. Although similar small ORFs found in the Closteroviridae encode SHP, no evidence of transmembrane domains in p6 have been detected (Kreuze et al., 2002; and results not shown), and instead the SHP is represented by the p7 on RNA1. However, in comparison to isolate Ug, SPCSV m2-47 contains an additional ORF of predicted 6 kDa (p6-SHP) with characteristic transmembrane helices predicted in its central region (Fig. 1). The p6-SHP showed no similarity in sequence to p6. A single nucleotide substitution (A575 → T) creates a stop codon interrupting a hypothetical p6-SHP in the corresponding region of isolate Ug. If not interrupted, this protein would show 88% aa identity to the p6-SHP of m2-47 and contain a similar predicted transmembrane helix region. Seven additional isolates analyzed in this study also contain p6-SHP in this region, suggesting that the lack of this ORF in SPCSV-Ug may be the result of a sequencing error. On the other hand the predicted first p6 ORF was not present in isolates Africa10 and Bitambi. The closteroviral SHP have a role in virus movement and have been found associated to membranes in the endoplasmic reticulum (Dolja et al., 2006). Duplication of SHPs in various positions of the genome is not uncommon among Closteroviridae, and they usually show little sequence similarity.

3′-UTR of RNA1 and RNA2 differed significantly: RNA1 and RNA2 of isolate m2-47 shows less than 82% nt identity at the 3′-UTR. In contrast, the 3′-UTRs of isolate Ug have a 99% nt sequence identity and are 99–99.5% identical to the 3′-UTR of m2-47 RNA2. Partial sequences of RNA 3′-UTRs of other SPCSV isolates lacking a p22 ORF show they have a similar distinct RNA1-3′-UTR as m2-47 (Fig. 1B) when compared to SPCSV-Ug (Cuellar et al., 2008) (Fig. 1). This variability in sequence among virus isolates is not observed at the 5′-UTR.

All viruses encode at least one RSS protein (Li and Ding, 2006; Cañizares et al., 2008; Lu et al., 2004) and all SPCSV isolates contain the RNase3 RSS (Cuellar et al., 2008). The low sequence conservation between the RSS genes of different viruses has been suggested as an indication of their relatively recent and independent acquisitions by viruses to counteract RNA silencing (Li and Ding, 2006). On the other hand, recombination-mediated gene gain has been suggested as a frequent phenomenon in the Closteroviridae (Dolja et al., 2006) explaining the incorporation of genes such as homologs of plant heat shock proteins (hsp70h) and RNase III-like genes with marginal aa sequence similarity to cellular RNase III enzymes (Dolja et al., 2006). The exceptional high similarity between the 3′-UTR of RNA1 and RNA2 of SPCSV-Ug, not observed in other criniviruses, also suggest recombination as a mechanism shaping the genome organization of SPCSV. Interestingly the high similarity in the 3′-UTRs of RNA1 and RNA2 seems common among EAp22 isolates, but is not found in EA or in the quite distant WA strain isolates (Cuellar et al., 2008; Fig. 1B). We suggest that the incorporation of p22 in RNA1 may be related to the high sequence identity between the 3′-UTR of RNA2 and RNA1 observed in EAp22 isolates: i.e. p22 may have been acquired after its own 3′-UTR recombined with the 3′-UTR of SPCSV RNA2 (including the last 5 codons of p28; Fig. 1B) which enabled it to be recognized by the viral polymerase, thus perhaps facilitating its subsequent incorporation into RNA1 (Fig. 1). The alternative explanation, that p22 was ancestrally present and subsequently lost seems less likely as an almost identical excision event and acquisition of divergent 3′-UTR would need to have occurred in the distantly related EA and WA strains of SPCSV.

Only limited phenotypic differences between single-infection with EA and EAp22 isolates can be observed in sweetpotato (Cuellar et al., 2008). In addition a critical role for p22 in development of SPVD has been discarded (Cuellar et al., 2008, 2009). Accordingly, isolates collected in this study and co-infected with SPFMV showed symptoms of SPVD regardless of the absence of p22 (Table 1). To study the role of p22 on the biology of SPCSV we used transgenic sweetpotato expressing p22 under a phloem specific promoter (Cuellar et al., 2009), thus delivering the protein in trans and avoiding the effects of isolate sequence variability on virus accumulation. Results from TAS-ELISA experiments indicate that although differences in SPCSV accumulation were only significant in one event (p < 0.05, Fig. 2) the average titers of SPCSV-m2-47 in p22 transgenic sweetpotato plants were always higher than in non-transgenic plants. This is consistent with previous observations where we show that isolate Ug accumulate at higher levels in sweetpotato (cultivar “Tanzania”) as compared to other EA isolates (Cuellar et al., 2008), and suggests the activity of p22 alone is sufficient to explain this difference.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Open in a new tab

Accumulation of Sweet potato chlorotic stunt virus (SPCSV) isolate m2-47 in non-transgenic and transgenic sweetpotato expressing the p22 gene of SPCSV. Virus titers were measured by triple antibody sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Karyeija et al., 2000) in leaves of the middle part (average of the 5th and 6th leaf) of three plants 6 weeks after infection. Different letters over each bar indicate significant differences according to the test of High Significance Difference – HSD, α = 0.05. NT = non-transgenic sweetpotato.

Given that isolates containing p22 have not been found in regions outside East Africa (Cuellar et al., 2008) including the Americas (this work) and considering reports on East Africa as a region hosting a high variability of sweetpotato viruses and virus strains, including SPCSV (Alicai et al., 1999; Gibson et al., 1998; Tugume et al., 2010; Tairo et al., 2005) it is likely that the acquisition event of p22 may have occurred rather recently in East Africa (specifically Uganda), a region where it is possible to find both EA and EAp22 isolates (Cuellar et al., 2008; Hoyer et al., 1996a; this study) and where breeding for virus-resistance in sweetpotato has been an intense activity (Aritua et al., 1999; Mwanga et al., 2001). Strong selection pressure exerted by highly resistant sweetpotato grown in the region may thus have lead to evolution and subsequent spread of EAp22. Although the origin of p22 remains unknown, plausible possibilities are the host genome or an as yet unidentified co-infecting (crini-)virus.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Jaime Arellano, Ana Perez and Marco Galvez for technical help. Thanks to S. Tumwegamire and W. Perez for providing SPCSV-infected sweetpotato samples from Uganda. Critical review of the manuscript by Richard Gibson is gratefully acknowledged. Financial support from the Howard Buffet Foundation and BBSRC/DFID/SARID grant BBF0040281 is acknowledged.

References

  1. Alicai T., Fenby N.S., Gibson R.W., Adipala E., Vetten H.J., Foster G.D., Seal S.E. Occurrence of two serotypes of sweet potato chlorotic stunt virus in East Africa and their associated differences in coat protein and hsp70 homologue gene sequences. Plant Pathol. 1999;48:718–726. [Google Scholar]
  2. Aritua V., Legg J.P., Smit N.E.J.M., Gibson R.W. Effect of local inoculum on the spread of sweet potato virus disease: limited infection of susceptible cultivars following widespread cultivation of a resistant sweet potato cultivar. Plant Pathol. 1999;48:655–661. [Google Scholar]
  3. Baulcombe D.C. RNA silencing in plants. Nature. 2004;431:356–363. doi: 10.1038/nature02874. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cañizares M.C., Navas-Castillo J., Moriones E. Multiple suppressors of RNA silencing encoded by both genomic RNAs of the crinivirus, Tomato chlorosis virus. Virology. 2008;379:168–174. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2008.06.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cuellar W.J., Kreuze J.F., Rajamäki M.L., Cruzado K.R., Untiveros M., Valkonen J.P.T. Elimination of antiviral defense by viral RNase III. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2009;106:10354–10358. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0806042106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cuellar W.J., Tairo F., Kreuze J.F., Valkonen J.P.T. Analysis of gene content in Sweet potato chlorotic stunt virus RNA1 reveals the presence of p22 RNA silencing suppressor in only few isolates: implications to viral evolution and synergism. J. Gen. Virol. 2008;89:573–582. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.83471-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Di Feo L.D., Nome S.F., Biderbost E., Fuentes S., Salazar L.F. Etiology of sweet potato chlorotic dwarf disease in Argentina. Plant Dis. 2000;84:35–39. doi: 10.1094/PDIS.2000.84.1.35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dolja V.V., Kreuze J.F., Valkonen J.P.T. Comparative and functional genomics of closteroviruses. Virus Res. 2006;117:38–51. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2006.02.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gibson R.W., Mpembe I., Alizai T., Carey E.E., Mwanga R.O.M., Seal S.K., Vetten H.F. Symptoms, aetiology and serological analysis of sweet potato virus disease in Uganda. Plant Pathol. 1998;47:95–102. [Google Scholar]
  10. Gutierrez D.L., Fuentes S., Salazar L.F. Sweetpotato virus disease (SPVD): distribution, incidence, and effect on sweetpotato yield in Peru. Plant Dis. 2003;87:297–302. doi: 10.1094/PDIS.2003.87.3.297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hoyer U., Jelkmann W., Maiss E., Vetten H.J. Sweet potato sunken vein virus (SPSVV): another bipartite closterovirus transmitted by Bemisia tabaci. Phytoparasitica; Abstract book of the Xth International Congress of Virology, Jerusalem, Israel; 1996. p. 22. [Google Scholar]
  12. Hoyer U., Maiss E., Jelkmann W., Lesemann D.-E., Vetten H.J. Identification of the coat protein gene of a sweet potato sunken vein closterovirus isolate from Kenya and evidence for a serological relationship among geographically diverse closterovirus isolates from sweetpotato. Phytopathology. 1996;86:744–750. [Google Scholar]
  13. Karyeija R.F., Kreuze J.F., Gibson R.W., Valkonen J.P.T. Synergistic interaction of a potyvirus and a phloem-limited crinivirus in sweetpotato plants. Virology. 2000;269:26–36. doi: 10.1006/viro.1999.0169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kokkinos C.D., Clark C.A. Interactions among sweet potato chlorotic stunt virus and different potyviruses and potyvirus strains infecting sweetpotato in the United States. Plant Dis. 2006;90:1347–1352. doi: 10.1094/PD-90-1347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kreuze J.F., Perez A., Untiveros M., Quispe D., Fuentes S., Barker I., Simon R. Complete viral genome sequence and discovery of novel viruses by deep sequencing of small RNAs: a generic method for diagnosis, discovery and sequencing of viruses. Virology. 2009;388:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2009.03.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kreuze J.F., Savenkov E.I., Cuellar W.J., Li X., Valkonen J.P.T. Viral class 1 RNase III involved in suppression of RNA silencing. J. Virol. 2005;79:7227–7238. doi: 10.1128/JVI.79.11.7227-7238.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kreuze J.F., Savenkov E.I., Valkonen J.P.T. Complete sequence and analyses of the subgenomic RNAs of Sweet Potato Chlorotic Stunt Virus reveal several new features for the genus Crinivirus. J. Virol. 2002;76:9260–9270. doi: 10.1128/JVI.76.18.9260-9270.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kumar S., Nei M., Dudley J., Tamura K. MEGA: a biologist-centric software for evolutionary analysis of DNA and protein sequences. Briefings BioInformatics. 2008;9:299–306. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbn017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Li F., Ding S.W. Virus counterdefense: diverse strategies for evading the RNA-silencing immunity. Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 2006;60:503–531. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.60.080805.142205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Li R., Salih S., Hurtt S. Detection of geminiviruses in sweetpotato by polymerase chain reaction. Plant Dis. 2004;88:1347–1351. doi: 10.1094/PDIS.2004.88.12.1347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lu R., Folimonov A., Shintaku M., Li W.X., Falk B.W., Dawson W.O., Ding S.W. Three distinct suppressors of RNA silencing encoded by a 20-kb viral RNA genome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2004;101:15742–15747. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0404940101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Milgram M., Cohen J., Loebenstein G. Effects of Sweet potato feathery mottle virus and sweet potato sunken vein virus on sweet potato yields and rates of reinfection of virus-free planting material in Israel. Phytoparasitica. 1996;24:189–193. [Google Scholar]
  23. Mukasa S.B., Rubaihayo P.R., Valkonen J.P.T. Interactions between a crinivirus, an ipomovirus and a potyvirus in co-infected sweetpotato plants. Plant Pathol. 2006;55:458–467. [Google Scholar]
  24. Mwanga R.O.M., Odongo B., Ocitti-p’Obwoja C.N., Gibson R.W., Smit N.E.J.M., Carey E.E. Release of five sweetpotato cultivars in Uganda. HortScience. 2001;36:385–386. [Google Scholar]
  25. Tairo F., Mukasa S.B., Jones R.A., Kullaya A., Rubaihayo P.R., Valkonen J.P.T. Unraveling the genetic diversity of the three main viruses involved in sweet potato virus disease (SPVD), and its practical implications. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2005;6:199–211. doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2005.00267.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Tugume A.K., Cuellar W.J., Mukasa S.B., Valkonen J.P.T. Molecular genetic analysis of virus isolates from wild and cultivated plants demonstrates that East Africa is a hotspot for the evolution and diversification of Sweet potato feathery mottle virus. Mol. Ecol. 2010;19:3139–3156. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04682.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Untiveros M., Fuentes S., Kreuze J.F. Molecular variability of sweet potato feathery mottle virus and other potyviruses infecting sweet potato in Peru. Arch. Virol. 2008;153:473–483. doi: 10.1007/s00705-007-0019-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Untiveros M., Fuentes S., Salazar L.F. Synergistic interaction of sweet potato chlorotic stunt virus (Crinivirus) with carla-, cucumo-, ipomo-, and potyviruses infecting sweet potato. Plant Dis. 2007;91:669–676. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-91-6-0669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Valverde R., Moreira M.A. Identificación de virus en el cultivo de camote (Ipomoea batatas L.) en Costa Rica. Agronomía Mesoamericana. 2004;15:1–7. [Google Scholar]
  30. Vetten H.J., Hoyer U., Maiss E., Lesemann D.-E., Jelkmann W. Serologicla detection and discrimination of geographically diverse isolates of sweet potato sunken vein closterovirus. Phytopathology. 1996;11(Suppl.):100. (Abstract 891A) [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES