Abstract
In order to assess antimicrobial resistance in Listeria monocytogenes, 202 food and environmental isolates from 1996 to 2006 were tested. Only four strains displayed acquired resistance. Resistance to erythromycin, tetracycline-minocycline, and trimethoprim was evidenced, and the genes erm(B), tet(M), and dfrD, already found in L. monocytogenes, were detected.
Since the early 1980s, listeriosis has been considered a public health concern. In France, listeriosis cases must be reported and isolates are regularly molecularly subtyped for surveillance purposes, but antimicrobial resistance data are scarce. In 2008, 0.3 cases per 100,000 inhabitants were reported in the European Union. Listeriosis is among the most important causes of death from food-borne infections in industrialized countries (5). Listeria infection usually requires antimicrobial treatment to heal. Recommendations are penicillin G or ampicillin combined (or not) with an aminoglycoside (4).
Little is known about Listeria monocytogenes antimicrobial resistance, especially for non-human-origin isolates. Vela et al. (15) reported resistance to tetracycline at a low frequency in a sheep and feed study. Out of a collection of 210 isolates from various food items, Filiousis et al. (6) detected a unique isolate from beef meat resistant to tetracycline and carrying the tet(M) gene. Finally, Roberts et al. (13) collected, also from food samples, a unique isolate resistant to erythromycin and carrying an erm(C) gene. Such a small number of publications on this subject leads us to wonder if acquisition of resistance is a rare event in non-human-origin L. monocytogenes or if it is only poorly studied.
The aim of this study was to determine the resistance phenotype and genotype evolution over a 10-year period of L. monocytogenes isolated from food and the environment in France.
Strain collection.
Two hundred two strains were collected between 1996 and 2006. They were selected on the basis of a unique pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) profile after digestion by ApaI and AscI (14), performed as recommended by PulseNet Europe (10). Serotypes were 1/2a (55%), 4b (18%), 1/2b (13%), 1/2c (6%), 3a (2%), 3b (1%), 1/2 H=0 (0.5%), 3c (0.5%), 4a (0.5%), rough (0.5%), and not determined (1%). Half of the strains were isolated from food samples and a quarter from food processing plants; the balance was equally divided between natural-ecosystem and breeding-plant environmental samples. Major food channels were represented: dairy, 40%; sea products, 15%; pig, 10%; poultry, 5%; and cattle, 5%. Collection details are presented in Table S1 in the supplemental material.
Antibiotic susceptibility testing.
Facing the lack of information about the appropriate antimicrobials to be tested and their expected range of concentrations, a generic Gram-positive commercial panel was used for MIC determination by the microdilution method. Ready-to-use Sensititre microplates (GPN2F) were inoculated with 100 μl Mueller-Hinton broth with lysed horse blood (Trek Diagnostic Systems, West Sussex, United Kingdom). The following antibiotics were tested: penicillin G, ampicillin, cefazoline, ceftriaxone, gentamicin, erythromycin, clarithromycin, clindamycin, linezolid, quinupristin-dalfopristin, levofloxacin, gatifloxacin, rifampin, co-trimoxazole, tetracycline, and vancomycin. Reading was performed using the Vizion system (Trek Diagnostic Systems).
Very limited guidelines for interpreting the MIC results for L. monocytogenes are available; the CLSI provides criteria only for penicillin G and co-trimoxazole (3). However, the monomodal distribution of the MICs allowed delineation of the wild-type populations. MIC ranges are presented in Table 1. Most L. monocytogenes strains isolated from food and the environment during the period from 1996 to 2006 were fully susceptible to the penicillins, gentamicin, linezolid, rifampin, and vancomycin and were naturally resistant to cephalosporins.
Table 1.
Antimicrobial agent | MIC range (mg/liter) |
---|---|
Ampicillin | <0.06–1 |
Penicillin G | 0.125–1 |
Cefazoline | <1–8 |
Ceftriaxone | <4–32 |
Gentamicin | <1–2 |
Erythromycin | <0.125–0.25 |
Clarithromycin | <0.5–1 |
Clindamycin | <0.25–2 |
Linezolid | 1–4 |
Quinupristin-dalfopristin | 0.25–2 |
Levofloxacin | 0.5–2 |
Gatifloxacin | <0.5–4 |
Rifampin | <0.25–0.5 |
Co-trimoxazole | <0.25 |
Tetracycline | <1–2 |
Vancomycin | <0.5–2 |
As shown in Table 2, 4 strains (2% of the 202 isolates tested) were resistant: 2 to erythromycin, 1 to tetracycline-minocycline, and 1 to trimethoprim and tetracycline-minocycline. Those resistance phenotypes were confirmed by Etest (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden).
Table 2.
Strain | Serotype | Origin | MIC (mg/liter) of: |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tetracycline | Co-trimoxazole | Erythromycin | |||
LSEA 01-08 | 4b | Activated sludge | >4 | ||
LSEA 02-09 | 4b | Sludge | >4 | ||
03EB250LM | 1/2a | Pork cheek | >8 | ||
04CEB563LM | 1/2a | Surface (beef processing plant) | >8 | >2 |
Acquired resistance to quinolones and chloramphenicol, reported previously (1), was not detected.
Molecular characterization of acquired resistance.
The 4 resistant strains were screened by PCR for the resistance genes erm(A), erm(B), erm(C), erm(TR) [a subset of the erm(A) class], mef(A), and msr(A) for macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B (MLSB), dfrD for trimethoprim, tet(M), tet(S), tet(K), and tet(L) for tetracyclines, and the int-Tn gene, encoding the integrase of the Tn916-Tn1545 family of transposons, as previously described (11).
In Listeria spp., two genes for resistance to MLSB, erm(B) and erm(C), have been reported (1). These erm (erythromycin ribosome methylase) genes encode methyltransferases that modify 23S rRNA. In Gram-positive bacteria, resistance to 14- and 15-membered-ring macrolides can also be mediated by drug efflux pumps belonging to the ATP-binding cassette transporter family [msr(A) gene] or to the major facilitator superfamily [mef(A) gene] (9). In this study, both erythromycin-resistant strains, LSEA 02-09 and LSEA 01-08, carried the erm(B) gene. The erm(A), erm(C), erm(TR), mef(A) and msr(A) determinants were not detected.
Dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) is a key enzyme in the tetrahydrofolic pathway, in which it catalyzes the NADPH-dependent reduction of dihydrofolate to tetrahydrofolate (7). The most common mechanism of resistance to trimethoprim is plasmid-mediated production of an additional trimethoprim-resistant DHFR. The first strain of L. monocytogenes resistant to high levels of trimethoprim was isolated in 1995 from the environment in France and harbored the dfrD gene (2). Trimethoprim resistance in L. monocytogenes 04CEB563LM was of a high level (MIC = 1,024 mg/ml) and was due to dfrD acquisition.
Two known mechanisms of resistance to tetracyclines have been found in Listeria spp.: efflux by proton antiporters, conferring resistance to tetracycline only [tet(L)], and ribosome protection, conferring resistance to both tetracycline and minocycline [tet(M) and tet(S)] (1). Both strains 03EB250LM and 04CEB563LM were resistant to tetracycline and minocycline due to the acquisition of the tet(M) gene. This determinant is highly prevalent in Listeria isolates resistant to tetracyclines (1) and is often associated with conjugative elements of the Tn916 family (12). Accordingly, the int-Tn gene, encoding the integrase of Tn916-Tn1545, was found in 03EB250LM and 04CEB563LM. The tet(S), tet(K), and tet(L) determinants were not detected.
Thus, only 2% of the L. monocytogenes strains studied displayed resistance due to acquisition of genes that had already been found in L. monocytogenes in the 1990s.
Even if the number of resistant strains is low, notably, three of the four resistant strains were isolated from environmental sources. Moreover, two isolates were of serotype 4b, the most frequently encountered serotype in human infections. Both strains were recovered from sludge from the same purification plant (8), at a 1-year distance, and even if they displayed different PFGE profiles, an epidemiological link between these strains is likely.
The present results are not in favor of dissemination of resistance determinants within the population of L. monocytogenes strains from nonhuman sources in France. No resistance gene related to the preferred treatment, β-lactams and aminoglycosides (4), has been detected. However, resistance to trimethoprim is a problem since co-trimoxazole is the second-line therapy in case of allergy to β-lactams.
Comparison of this study to that of Morvan et al. (11), on French human L. monocytogenes isolates from 1989 to 2007, shows that the global frequency of acquired resistance is not higher than 2% in each strain collection. Results from the two studies are similar except that fluoroquinolone resistance has been found only in clinical isolates from humans.
Facing the recent increase of human listeriosis in industrialized countries, regular surveillance of L. monocytogenes should be maintained for early detection of any shift in the antimicrobial resistance of food or environmental isolates.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank Dik Mevius and Kees Veldman for technical advice.
Footnotes
Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://aem.asm.org/.
Published ahead of print on 25 February 2011.
REFERENCES
- 1. Charpentier E., Courvalin P. 1999. Antibiotic resistance in Listeria spp. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43:2103–2108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Charpentier E., Courvalin P. 1997. Emergence of the trimethoprim resistance gene dfrD in Listeria monocytogenes BM4293. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:1134–1136 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute 2006. M45-A. Methods for antimicrobial dilution and disk susceptibility testing of infrequently isolated or fastidious bacteria. Approved guideline. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA [Google Scholar]
- 4. Davis J. A., Jackson C. R. 2009. Comparative antimicrobial susceptibility of Listeria monocytogenes, L. innocua, and L. welshimeri. Microb. Drug Resist. 15:27–32 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. European Food Safety Authority 2010. The Community Summary Report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food-borne outbreaks in the European Union in 2008. EFSA J. 8:1496 [Google Scholar]
- 6. Filiousis G., Johansson A., Frey J., Perreten V. 2009. Prevalence, genetic diversity and antimicrobial susceptibility of Listeria monocytogenes isolated from open-air food markets in Greece. Food Control 20:314–317 [Google Scholar]
- 7. Huovinen P., Sundstrom L., Swedberg G., Skold O. 1995. Trimethoprim and sulfonamide resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 39:279–289 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Kerouanton A., et al. 2009. Characterization of isolates of Listeria monocytogenes from sludge using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and virulence assays. J. Appl. Microbiol. 108:1380–1388 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Leclercq R. 2002. Mechanisms of resistance to macrolides and lincosamides: nature of the resistance elements and their clinical implications. Clin. Infect. Dis. 34:482–492 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Martin P., Jacquet C., Goulet V., Vaillant V., De Valk H. 2006. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis of Listeria monocytogenes strains: the PulseNet Europe Feasibility Study. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 3:303–308 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Morvan A., et al. 2010. Antimicrobial resistance of Listeria monocytogenes strains isolated from humans in France. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 54:2728–2731 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Poyart-Salmeron C., Trieu-Cuot P., Carlier C., Courvalin P. 1989. Molecular characterization of two proteins involved in the excision of the conjugative transposon Tn1545: homologies with other site-specific recombinases. EMBO J. 8:2425–2433 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Roberts M. C., Facinelli B., Giovanetti E., Varaldo P. E. 1996. Transferable erythromycin resistance in Listeria spp. isolated from food. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62:269–270 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Roussel S., et al. 2010. Semi-automated repetitive-sequence-based polymerase chain reaction compared to pulsed-field gel electrophoresis for Listeria monocytogenes subtyping. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 7:1005–1012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Vela A. I., et al. 2001. Molecular typing by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis of Spanish animal and human Listeria monocytogenes isolates. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67:5840–5843 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.