Skip to main content
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 2011 May;77(10):3461–3467. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02657-10

Formyltetrahydrofolate Synthetase Gene Diversity in the Guts of Higher Termites with Different Diets and Lifestyles

Elizabeth A Ottesen 1,§, Jared R Leadbetter 2,*
PMCID: PMC3126463  PMID: 21441328

Abstract

In this study, we examine gene diversity for formyl-tetrahydrofolate synthetase (FTHFS), a key enzyme in homoacetogenesis, recovered from the gut microbiota of six species of higher termites. The “higher” termites (family Termitidae), which represent the majority of extant termite species and genera, engage in a broader diversity of feeding and nesting styles than the “lower” termites. Previous studies of termite gut homoacetogenesis have focused on wood-feeding lower termites, from which the preponderance of FTHFS sequences recovered were related to those from acetogenic treponemes. While sequences belonging to this group were present in the guts of all six higher termites examined, treponeme-like FTHFS sequences represented the majority of recovered sequences in only two species (a wood-feeding Nasutitermes sp. and a palm-feeding Microcerotermes sp.). The remaining four termite species analyzed (a Gnathamitermes sp. and two Amitermes spp. that were recovered from subterranean nests with indeterminate feeding strategies and a litter-feeding Rhynchotermes sp.) yielded novel FTHFS clades not observed in lower termites. These termites yielded two distinct clusters of probable purinolytic Firmicutes and a large group of potential homoacetogens related to sequences previously recovered from the guts of omnivorous cockroaches. These findings suggest that the gut environments of different higher termite species may select for different groups of homoacetogens, with some species hosting treponeme-dominated homoacetogen populations similar to those of wood-feeding, lower termites while others host Firmicutes-dominated communities more similar to those of omnivorous cockroaches.

INTRODUCTION

The insect order Isoptera is divided into seven major families. Six of these families are comprised of “lower termites,” which are exclusively wood and/or grass feeders. The “higher termites” are a single family (Termitidae), which nonetheless contains about 85% of known genera (10). Higher termites are able to utilize a much broader range of substrates than lower termites; in addition to wood and grass feeding, higher termite species have evolved fungus-cultivating, litter- and soil-feeding lifestyles. Higher termites with different feeding habits have been found to have vastly different complements of symbiotic bacteria (21, 32, 33, 35).

The symbiosis between termites and their gut microbes is a complex, obligate mutualism. The hindgut community acts as a highly efficient bioreactor, converting complex substrates to acetate, which constitutes the principal source of energy for the termite (22). In wood-feeding termites, H2 is the central free intermediate in the degradation of lignocellulose, representing 18 to 26% of the termite's respiratory activity (27). The majority (83 to 100%) of this hydrogen is converted to acetate through homoacetogenesis (27). In contrast, soil-feeding and fungus-cultivating termites have been shown to have relatively lower rates of gut homoacetogenesis and higher rates of methanogenesis from H2 and CO2 (3), suggesting that diet can have a large impact on the homoacetogenic community.

While most termite gut homoacetogens are as yet uncultured, the diversity of organisms that may be capable of carrying out this activity can be assessed using primers that target the gene for formyl-tetrahydrofolate synthetase (FTHFS), a key enzyme in the Wood-Ljungdahl pathway of homoacetogenesis (12, 14). In lower termites, the dominant FTHFS types group phylogenetically with FTHFS genes from homoacetogenic spirochetes of the genus Treponema (26, 31). The recent metagenome of microbes inhabiting the gut of the wood-feeding higher termite Nasutitermes revealed the presence of termite treponeme-like FTHFS genes (35). However, the fragmentary nature of that data set precludes detailed phylogenetic analysis of those sequences, and a survey of FTHFS genes in other species of higher termites has not yet been presented. Here we explore the diversity of homoacetogenic organisms present in 6 species of higher termites having diverse feeding regimes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Insect collection.

Nasutitermes sp. Cost003 and Rhynchotermes sp. Cost004 were collected in the INBio forest preserve in Guápiles, Costa Rica. Nasutitermes sp. Cost003 was collected at a height of 1.2 m in a Psidium guajaba tree and appeared to be feeding on deadwood. Rhynchotermes sp. Cost004 was collected in the same area from a nest located under an unidentified bromeliad, with feeding trails leading to a large pile of wet, decaying plant leaves, consistent with a litter-feeding lifestyle. Microcerotermes sp. Cost008 was collected from the base of a palm tree about 100 m from the beach at Cahuita National Park in Costa Rica and appeared to be feeding on dead portions of the same plant. Amitermes sp. Cost010 was collected from the roots of dead sugar cane plants at a Costa Rican plantation. Amitermes sp. JT2 and Gnathamitermes sp. JT5 were collected from subterranean nests at Joshua Tree National Park.

DNA extraction.

Guts were extracted from termites within 48 h of collection. Whole guts were collected from 20 workers of each species. Extracted whole guts were suspended in 500 μl 1× TE (10 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA, pH 7.4) and stored at −20°C until DNA purification. DNA was purified from gut samples using a bead-beating lysis followed by DNeasy purification (Qiagen), as described by Matson et al. (17).

FTHFS amplification, cloning, and RFLP analysis.

FTHFS genes were amplified from insect guts as described by Leaphart and Lovell (12). Primers with 5′ phosphate groups were purchased from Integrated DNA Technologies. Amplification reactions for cloning contained 1 μM (each) primer, 1× Failsafe premix D (Epicentre), and 0.0525 U/μl Expand high-fidelity Taq polymerase (Roche). FTHFS was amplified from Cost003 in reaction mixtures containing 1 ng/μl template and following the recommended step-down protocol (12), followed by 25 cycles at an annealing temperature of 55°C. All other termite samples contained low levels of PCR-inhibiting compounds and required further dilution; these reaction mixtures contained 0.1 ng/μl template and were amplified for an additional 5 cycles at 55°C to generate a similar final concentration of product. PCRs were purified using QIAquick PCR purification kits (Qiagen) and cloned using a GC cloning and amplification kit with the LC-Kan vector (Lucigen).

Cloned PCR products were screened by restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis. Isolated colonies were picked and placed in 10 μl 1× TE and then incubated at 95°C for 5 min. This lysate was used for amplification reactions to generate a template for RFLP analyses and sequencing. Inserts were amplified using the vector primers SL1 and SR2 (Lucigen), FailSafe premix A (Epicentre), and 0.05 U/μl Taq polymerase (NEB). The thermocycling protocol was as follows: 3 min as 95°C, 30 cycles (95°C for 30 s, 55°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 1 min 30 s), and then 10 min at 72°C. RFLP typing used the enzyme HinP1I (NEB): 6 μl of the PCR product was added to 0.4 μl 10× NEB buffer 2, 0.3 μl HinP1I (NEB), and 3.3 μl H2O and then digested at 37°C for 4 h. A single representative clone of each RFLP type was amplified for sequencing using the protocol above and substituting Expand high-fidelity polymerase (Roche) for Taq DNA polymerase.

COII identification of termites.

For each species of Joshua tree termite, COII gene fragments were amplified using the supernatant of a mixture containing an individual termite head crushed in 1× TE as a template. Termite COII was amplified using the primers CI-J-1773 and B-tLys and cycling conditions described by Miura et al. (20). Reactions included FailSafe premix D (Epicentre) and Expand high-fidelity Taq polymerase (Roche).

The identification of the Nasutitermes, Microcerotermes, and Amitermes termites was confirmed to the genus level with molecular phylogeny (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). Nasutitermes sp. Cost003 was collected within 30 feet of the Nasutitermes sp. FK-2007 nest previously collected for metagenomic sequencing (35) and had an identical COII gene sequence. No COII genes were available in public databases for Rhynchotermes or Gnathamitermes, so identification of Cost004 and JT5 relied on termite morphology (6, 36). The COII gene from the Gnathamitermes genus groups closely with sequences from Amitermes termites. The genus Rhynchotermes is typically classified as a member of the Nasutiterminae subfamily. However, this family is paraphyletic (2, 9), and Rhynchotermes sp. Cost004 grouped phylogenetically with termites from the proposed subfamily Syntermitinae (5).

Sequence analysis.

Sequence reads were assembled and edited using the Lasergene software package (version 7.2.1; Dnastar, Inc.). FTHFS protein sequences were aligned and phylogenetic analyses were carried out using the ARB software package (16). Libraries were screened for chimeric sequences using the Bellerophon software program (8); a single putative chimeric sequence each was eliminated from the Nasutitermes sp. Cost003 and Rhynchotermes sp. Cost004 libraries.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

Sequences generated in this study have been deposited in GenBank under accession numbers JF431107 to JF431248.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

FTHFS libraries were constructed from 4 species of higher termite from Costa Rica and 2 desert-adapted species from California (Table 1). Phylogenetic analysis of recovered FTHFS shows a broad diversity (Fig. 1). With the exception of a sequence that grouped with sulfate-reducing Proteobacteria and another that could not be placed reliably within the FTHFS phylogeny (Gnathamitermes clones 2F and 2E, respectively; not shown), all of the recovered sequences grouped with either Firmicutes- or Treponema-like FTHFS sequences. While the Treponema-like FTHFS types formed a monophyletic clade with other insect gut-derived clones, the Firmicutes-like FTHFS types represented a number of distinct clades, some of which most likely represent nonacetogenic organisms. Major clades, discussed in detail below, include the Clostridium sp. M62/1 group and two groups of probable purinolytic organisms, the clone E/Streptococcus group and the Clostridium acidurici group.

Table 1.

FTHFS libraries constructed in this study

Species No. of clonesa No. of RFLP typesa No. of OTU (98% aa)b
Nasutitermes sp. Cost003 52 19 14
Rhynchotermes sp. Cost004 61 41 29
Microcerotermes sp. Cost008 27 16 12
Amitermes sp. Cost010 26 18 17
Amitermes sp. JT2 89 23 14
Gnathamitermes sp. JT5 60 24 22
a

Excludes non-full-length clones and RFLP types and clones determined to be chimeric.

b

Operational taxonomic unit (OTU) classification was based on at least 98% amino acid identity.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Phylogenetic analysis of higher termite FTHFS clones and selected relatives. The tree was constructed using 317 unambiguous, aligned amino acids and the PhyML maximum-likelihood algorithm. Homoacetogen similarity (HS) scores are shown for each isolate or environmental clone. Open circles indicate nodes also supported by either the Fitch distance or Phylip parsimony method. Closed circles indicate nodes supported by all three algorithms. The scale bar indicates 0.1 changes per alignment position. Inset: phylogenetic analysis of termite and roach mitochondrial COII genes. The tree was calculated using 394 unambiguous, aligned DNA bases. The scale bar indicates 0.1 changes per alignment position. A more detailed phylogenetic analysis of COII genes is presented in Fig. S1 in the supplemental material.

To complement phylogenic analysis, a homoacetogen similarity (HS) score was calculated according to the method of Henderson et al. (7). This measure represents the percentage of residues in 40 alignment positions shared with known homoacetogens. Clades identified as belonging to probable purinolytic Firmicutes and other nonacetogens had low HS scores. Many of the termite treponemes and affiliated sequences had high HS scores (≥95), as did a number of sequences in the M62/1 clade, suggesting that at least some of the sequences in these groups represent novel homoacetogens.

Higher termite treponemes.

All higher termites examined yielded at least one FTHFS sequence that affiliated with the “Termite treponemes and affiliates” clade. Most of the sequences included in this group share a hexapeptide insert absent from other homoacetogens (31). The basal Microcerotermes and Cryptocercus punctulatus clusters lack this indel but were included based on the strength of their phylogenetic association with treponeme-like sequences (robustly grouping with this clade by all three treeing methods). The majority of the treponeme-affiliated sequences amplified from higher termites formed a single cluster (detailed in Fig. 2) with a single sequence from the lower termite Reticulitermes santonensis. This cluster represents a large diversity of sequences, including an extensive radiation of sequences from the guts of Rhynchotermes termites and a highly microdiverse cluster of sequences from Nasutitermes. The only treponeme-affiliated sequences that fell outside this cluster were a group of sequences found in Microcerotermes and a single sequence identified in Amitermes sp. Cost010.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Phylogenetic analysis of the higher termite treponeme clade. Tree were constructed using 344 unambiguous, aligned amino acids and the PhyML maximum-likelihood algorithm. The HS score is shown next to each clone name. Open circles indicate nodes also supported by either the Fitch distance or Phylip parsimony method. Closed circles indicate nodes supported by all three algorithms. The scale bar indicates 0.1 changes per alignment position. The outgroup consisted of the 13 acetogenic isolates in Fig. 1 plus Treponema spp. ZAS-8 and ZAS-9.

Sequences affiliated with Clostridium sp. M62/1.

The majority of sequences recovered from two Amitermes termites affiliated with a large group of Firmicutes-like FTHFS sequences (the Clostridium sp. M62/1 clade in Fig. 1; phylogenetic detail is in Fig. 3), as do a large fraction of FTHFS sequences recovered in a similar study of the gut microbiota of the omnivorous cockroach Periplaneta americana (24). Clostridium sp. M62/1 is a butyrate-producing firmicute (13); to our knowledge, that isolate has not been examined for homoacetogenic growth. This group is highly diverse, with relatively large evolutionary distances between recovered clones. Although a large diversity of genes belonging to this clade have been identified in the guts of several termites and cockroaches, very few animal gut sequences fall within this group. The exceptions include Clostridium sp. M62/1 and single clones from FTHFS libraries of human feces (23), the bovine rumen (18), and the rumen of silage-fed deer (7).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Phylogenetic analysis of the Clostridium sp. M62/1 clade. The tree was constructed using 327 unambiguous, aligned amino acids and the PhyML maximum-likelihood algorithm. The HS score is shown next to each clone. Open circles indicate nodes also supported by either the Fitch distance or Phylip parsimony method. Closed circles indicate nodes supported by all three algorithms. The scale bar indicates 0.1 changes per alignment position. The 13 acetogenic isolates in Fig. 1 were used as an outgroup.

It remains unclear whether the M62/1 clade includes CO2-reductive acetogens. As mentioned above, M62/1 itself is not known to be capable of homoacetogenic growth, and the low HS score for its FTHFS gene and absence of a recognizable carbon monoxide dehydrogenase/acetyl coenzyme A synthetase gene in the draft genome are not suggestive of homoacetogenic capacity. However, this does not preclude homoacetogenic capacity for other members of the M62/1 clade; many members have intermediate (>90) to high (>95) HS scores. P. americana is known to exhibit low but detectable rates of acetate synthesis from CO2 (4, 11), and organisms belonging to this clade remain the best candidates for potential acetogens of the FTHFS sequences recovered in libraries of P. americana (24). Observations of soil-feeding Cubitermes termites, which also have low measured rates of in situ CO2 fixation to acetate (3, 34), also show a robust population of CO2-reductive acetogens, detectable when gut homogenates are incubated with inhibitors of methanogenesis (34). While we have not yet determined the native diets or rates of gut methanogenesis of the Amitermes and Gnathamitermes termites examined in this study, it is suggestive that they yielded FTHFS populations more similar to those found in an omnivorous cockroach than to those found in their wood-feeding relatives.

Potentially purinolytic FTHFS clades.

Finally, although the primers utilized in this study were designed for specific detection of homoacetogenic FTHFS types, several intriguing probable nonacetogenic FTHFS types were identified in higher termite libraries. In these organisms, FTHFS seems likely to be playing a role in degradation of purines and/or amino acids.

One such clade, described as the Clostridium acidurici clade (Fig. 4 A), included sequences that affiliated with FTHFS sequences from the purinolytic firmicutes C. acidurici (1), Clostridium cylindrosporum (1), and Eubacterium acidaminophilum (37). In these organisms, anaerobic degradation of purines results in the transfer of a formimino group to tetrahydrofolate (THF). Formimino-THF is converted to formyl-THF, and FTHFS catalyzes the release of formate and THF and the generation of ATP via substrate-level phosphorylation. Recycling of uric acid by gut bacteria has been hypothesized to play a role in termite nitrogen conservation (28), and the presence of this FTHFS clade suggests that members of the Firmicutes may be carrying out this activity within the guts of Rhynchotermes and Gnathamitermes termites. Litter-feeding Rhynchotermes termites have been shown to have lower rates of nitrogen fixation than wood-feeding Nasutitermes (30). While this may be attributed to higher nitrogen content in their food source, uric acid recycling may also play a role.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Phylogenetic analysis of the Clostridium acidurici (A) and clone E/Streptococcus (B) clades. Trees were constructed using 344 (C. acidurici) or 343 (clone E) unambiguous, aligned amino acids and the PhyML maximum-likelihood algorithm. Open circles indicate nodes also supported by either the Fitch distance or Phylip parsimony method. Closed circles indicate nodes supported by all three algorithms. Scale bars indicate 0.1 changes per alignment position. The 13 acetogenic isolates in Fig. 1 were used as an outgroup for both trees.

Another group of FTHFS types potentially linked to purine or amino acid degradation is the clone E/Streptococcus clade (Fig. 4B). While the genomic contexts of the FTHFS genes from most of the firmicutes in this group do not provide obvious functional clues, in Enterococcus gallinarum the FTHFS is near a histidine-ammonia lyase and glutamate formiminotransferase, and the clone E-like FTHFS sequences in the three streptococci are part of a conserved histidine degradation operon. While the use of FTHFS to generate ATP from the release of formate during histidine degradation has not been formally reported for bacteria, the presence of glutamate formimidoyltransferase in certain bacterial histidine degradation operons has been observed in other bioinformatic analyses (25). This entire clade may represent FTHFS types employed in this manner, or alternatively it may represent FTHFS types adapted more generally to catalyzing formyl-THF metabolism rather than synthesis. One of the uricolytic strains isolated from Reticulitermes flavipes by Potrikus and Breznak (29) was a Streptococcus species; the termite-derived sequences may represent FTHFS genes from similar organisms. Interestingly, all of the Streptococcus species in this cluster have a second FTHFS variant that is closely related to those from other streptococci and which falls within a general Lactobacillus radiation (data not shown). It is therefore tempting to speculate that these Streptococcus species acquired the clone E-like FTHFS variant via lateral gene transfer from the Firmicutes and that it is primarily utilized in the context of histidine degradation, while the other FTHFS variant is used for general cellular folate metabolism.

Implications.

The diversity of lifestyles and feeding strategies employed by higher termites coincides with a diversity of population structures among symbiotic homoacetogens (Table 2). FTHFS sequences amplified from wood-feeding Nasutitermes termites and palm-feeding Microcerotermes termites affiliate with the homoacetogenic treponemes that dominate the guts of wood-feeding lower termites. The Rhynchotermes termites used in this study came from a colony that appeared to be feeding from a nearby compost pile with a mixture of woody and leaf detritus and had approximately equal representation of treponeme-like FTHFS and sequences affiliated with purinolytic firmicutes. The remaining termites were recovered from subterranean nests, although the degree to which they were feeding on soil or nearby plant material remains uncertain. These termites, whose diets may include some level of soil feeding (and who certainly experience greater exposure to soil), yielded a diversity of sequences that affiliate with the Firmicutes but few treponeme-like FTHFS sequences. The majority of the FTHFS types recovered from both Amitermes termites fell within the M62/1 clade, while the Gnathamitermes library was split between M62/1 and purinolytic FTHFS types. UniFrac measures of community distance (15) support these observations (see Fig. S3 and S4 in the supplemental material), grouping the Nasutitermes- and Microcerotermes-derived libraries with those from wood-feeding cockroaches and lower termites while identifying the two Amitermes-derived libraries as more similar to the omnivorous cockroach P. americana. When purinolytic FTHFS clades were included in the analysis, Rhynchotermes and Gnathamitermes termites were identified as distinct from other termite groups, but when the clone E and C. acidurici clades were excluded from the analysis, Rhynchotermes grouped with the wood-feeding termites while Gnathamitermes was grouped with the Amitermes spp. and P. americana.

Table 2.

Composition of FTHFS libraries from the hindgut microbiota of termites and relativesa

Species Food source % Sequence abundance
Termite treponemes Clostridium sp. M62/1 Clone E/Streptococcus Clostridium acidurici Other
P. americana Unknown NF 41 NF NF 59
C. punctulatus adult Wood 88 2 2 NF 8
C. punctulatus nymph Wood 50 3 41 NF 6
Z. nevadensis Wood 77 NF 4 NF 19
C. secundus Wood 97 NF NF NF 2
Incisitermes sp. Pas1 Wood 100 NF NF NF NF
R. santonensis Wood 98 NF 1 NF 1
Nasutitermes sp. Cost003 Woodb 98 NF NF NF 2
Microcerotermes sp. Cost008 Palmb 89 NF NF NF 11
Rhynchotermes sp. Cost004 Litterb 38 7 NF 46 10
Amitermes sp. Cost010 Sugarcane/soilb 12 69 NF NF 19
Amitermes sp. JT2 Grass/soilb 1 82 NF NF 17
Gnathamitermes sp. JT5 Grass/soilb 2 25 37 10 27
a

Sequence abundance for each major FTHFS clade is given as a percentage of total clones examined; NF, not found. P. americana, C. punctulatus, and Incisitermes data are from the work of Ottesen and Leadbetter (24), Z. nevadensis data are from Salmassi and Leadbetter (31), and C. secundus and R. santonensis data are from Pester and Brune (26).

b

Food source is unknown; probable sources are based on nest location and/or feeding trails.

The Rhynchotermes, Amitermes, and Gnathamitermes termites examined here represent the first examples of termite gut communities that are not dominated by FTHFS sequences from the termite treponeme clade. Given that treponeme-associated FTHFS types are present in these termites, it seems likely that this shift in community structure is due to the presence of conditions that favor this group over homoacetogenic treponemes. In numerous studies of FTHFS genes associated with animal guts (7, 12, 18, 19, 23), an abundance of Firmicutes-like and no treponeme-like FTHFS sequences have been discovered. It has been broadly observed that wood-feeding termites (both higher and lower) have higher rates of homoacetogenesis than soil feeders; this may correlate with a uniquely favorable environment for homoacetogenic treponemes.

Supplementary Material

[Supplemental material]

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This research was supported by the NIH (Caltech subcontract from R01-HG002644 and NIH/NRSA Training Grant for Biology 5T32GM07616), the DOE (DE-FG02-07ER64484), and the NSF (EF-0523267).

We are grateful to Myriam Hernández, Catalina Murillo, Luis G. Acosta, and Giselle Tamayo at Instituto Nacional de Biodiversidad, Santo Domingo de Heredia, Costa Rica, for help in locating and identifying termite nests in Costa Rica and Brian Green, Cathy Chang, and Eric J. Mathur, formerly of Verenium, Inc., for help in gaining permission to access sites and collect termites in Costa Rica. Specimens from Joshua Tree National Park were collected under a National Park Service research permit (JOTR-2008-SCI-0002).

Footnotes

Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://aem.asm.org/.

Published ahead of print on 25 March 2011.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Barker H. A., Beck J. V. 1942. Clostridium acidi-uridi and Clostridium cylindrosporum, organisms fermenting uric acid and some other purines. J. Bacteriol. 43:291–304 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Bitsch C., Noirot C. 2002. Gut characters and phylogeny of the higher termites (Isoptera: Termitidae). A cladistic analysis. Ann. Soc. Entomol. Fr. 38:201–210 [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Brauman A., Kane M. D., Labat M., Breznak J. A. 1992. Genesis of acetate and methane by gut bacteria of nutritionally diverse termites. Science 257:1384–1387 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Breznak J. A., Switzer J. M. 1986. Acetate synthesis from H2 plus CO2 by termite gut microbes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 52:623–630 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Engel M. S., Krishna K. 2004. Family-group names for termites (Isoptera). Am. Mus. Novit. 3432:1–9 [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Fontes L. R. 1985. New genera and new species of Nasutitermitinae from the Neotropical Region (Isoptera, Termitidae). Rev. Bras. Zool. 3:7–25 [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Henderson G., Naylor G. E., Leahy S. C., Janssen P. H. 2010. Presence of novel, potentially homoacetogenic bacteria in the rumen as determined by analysis of formyltetrahydrofolate synthetase sequences from ruminants. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76:2058–2066 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Huber T., Faulkner G., Hugenholtz P. 2004. Bellerophon: a program to detect chimeric sequences in multiple sequence alignments. Bioinformatics 20:2317–2319 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Inward D. J., Vogler A. P., Eggleton P. 2007. A comprehensive phylogenetic analysis of termites (Isoptera) illuminates key aspects of their evolutionary biology. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 44:953–967 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Kambhampati S., Eggleton P. 2000. Taxonomy and phylogeny of termites, p. 1–24In Abe T., Bignell D. E., Higashi M. (ed.), Termites: evolution, sociality, symbioses, ecology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Kane M. D., Breznak J. A. 1991. Effect of host diet on production of organic acids and methane by cockroach gut bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 57:2628–2634 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Leaphart A. B., Lovell C. R. 2001. Recovery and analysis of formyltetrahydrofolate synthetase gene sequences from natural populations of acetogenic bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67:1392–1395 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Louis P., et al. 2004. Restricted distribution of the butyrate kinase pathway among butyrate-producing bacteria from the human colon. J. Bacteriol. 186:2099–2106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Lovell C. R., Leaphart A. B. 2005. Community-level analysis: key genes of CO2-reductive acetogenesis. Methods Enzymol. 397:454–469 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Lozupone C., Hamady M., Knight R. 2006. UniFrac—an online tool for comparing microbial community diversity in a phylogenetic context. BMC Bioinform. 7:371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Ludwig W., et al. 2004. ARB: a software environment for sequence data. Nucleic Acids Res. 32:1363–1371 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Matson E., Ottesen E. A., Leadbetter J. 2007. Extracting DNA from the gut microbes of the termite (Zootermopsis nevadensis). J. Vis. Exp. 2007:195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Matsui H., Kojima N., Tajima K. 2008. Diversity of the formyltetrahydrofolate synthetase gene (fhs), a key enzyme for reductive acetogenesis, in the bovine rumen. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 72:3273–3276 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Matsui H., Yoneda S., Ban-Tokuda T., Wakita M. 2011. Diversity of the formyltetrahydrofolate synthetase (FTHFS) gene in the proximal and mid ostrich colon. Curr. Microbiol. 62:1–6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Miura T., Maekawa K., Kitade O., Abe T., Matsumoto T. 1998. Phylogenetic relationships among subfamilies in higher termites (Isoptera: Termitidae) based on mitochondrial COII gene sequences. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 91:515–523 [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Miyata R., et al. 2007. Influence of feed components on symbiotic bacterial community structure in the gut of the wood-feeding higher termite Nasutitermes takasagoensis. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 71:1244–1251 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Odelson D. A., Breznak J. A. 1983. Volatile fatty acid production by the hindgut microbiota of xylophagous termites. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 45:1602–1613 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Ohashi Y., Igarashi T., Kumazawa F., Fujisawa T. 2007. Analysis of acetogenic bacteria in human feces with formyltetrahydrofolate synthetase sequences. Biosci. Microflora 26:37–40 [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Ottesen E. A., Leadbetter J. R. 2010. Diversity of formyltetrahydrofolate synthetases in the guts of the wood-feeding cockroach Cryptocercus punctulatus and the omnivorous cockroach Periplaneta americana. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76:4909–4913 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Overbeek R., et al. 2005. The subsystems approach to genome annotation and its use in the project to annotate 1000 genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 33:5691–5702 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Pester M., Brune A. 2006. Expression profiles of fhs (FTHFS) genes support the hypothesis that spirochaetes dominate reductive acetogenesis in the hindgut of lower termites. Environ. Microbiol. 8:1261–1270 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Pester M., Brune A. 2007. Hydrogen is the central free intermediate during lignocellulose degradation by termite gut symbionts. ISME J. 1:551–565 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Potrikus C. J., Breznak J. A. 1981. Gut bacteria recycle uric acid nitrogen in termites: a strategy for nutrient conservation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 78:4601–4605 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Potrikus C. J., Breznak J. A. 1980. Uric acid-degrading bacteria in guts of termites [Reticulitermes flavipes (Kollar)]. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 40:117–124 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Prestwich G. D., Bentley B. L., Carpenter E. J. 1980. Nitrogen-sources for neotropical nasute termites—fixation and selective foraging. Oecologia 46:397–401 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Salmassi T. M., Leadbetter J. R. 2003. Analysis of genes of tetrahydrofolate-dependent metabolism from cultivated spirochaetes and the gut community of the termite Zootermopsis angusticollis. Microbiology 149:2529–2537 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Schmitt-Wagner D., Friedrich M. W., Wagner B., Brune A. 2003. Phylogenetic diversity, abundance, and axial distribution of bacteria in the intestinal tract of two soil-feeding termites (Cubitermes spp.). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69:6007–6017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Shinzato N., Muramatsu M., Matsui T., Watanabe Y. 2007. Phylogenetic analysis of the gut bacterial microflora of the fungus-growing termite Odontotermes formosanus. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 71:906–915 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Tholen A., Brune A. 1999. Localization and in situ activities of homoacetogenic bacteria in the highly compartmentalized hindgut of soil-feeding higher termites (Cubitermes spp.). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65:4497–4505 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Warnecke F., et al. 2007. Metagenomic and functional analysis of hindgut microbiota of a wood-feeding higher termite. Nature 450:560–565 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Weesner F. M. 1965. The termites of the United States: a handbook. The National Pest Control Association, Elizabeth, NJ [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Zindel U., et al. 1988. Eubacterium acidaminophilum sp. nov., a versatile amino acid-degrading anaerobe producing or utilizing H2 or formate—description and enzymatic studies. Arch. Microbiol. 150:254–266 [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

[Supplemental material]
supp_77_10_3461__1.pdf (1.1MB, pdf)

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES