Abstract
The effects of the Oryza sativa calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase OsCCaMK genotype (dominant homozygous [D], heterozygous [H], recessive homozygous [R]) on rice root-associated bacteria, including endophytes and epiphytes, were examined by using a Tos17 rice mutant line under paddy and upland field conditions. Roots were sampled at the flowering stage and were subjected to clone library analyses. The relative abundance of Alphaproteobacteria was noticeably decreased in R plants under both paddy and upland conditions (0.8% and 3.0%, respectively) relative to those in D plants (10.3% and 17.4%, respectively). Population shifts of the Sphingomonadales and Rhizobiales were mainly responsible for this low abundance in R plants. The abundance of Anaerolineae (Chloroflexi) and Clostridia (Firmicutes) was increased in R plants under paddy conditions. The abundance of a subpopulation of Actinobacteria (Saccharothrix spp. and unclassified Actinosynnemataceae) was increased in R plants under upland conditions. Principal coordinate analysis revealed unidirectional community shifts in relation to OsCCaMK gene dosage under both conditions. In addition, shoot length, tiller number, and plant weight decreased as the OsCCaMK gene dosage decreased under upland conditions. These results suggest significant impacts of OsCCaMK on both the diversity of root-associated bacteria and rice plant growth under both paddy and upland field conditions.
INTRODUCTION
Legumes developed systems to attain mutual symbiosis with rhizobia and mycorrhizae during their evolution. The genetic requirements for rhizobial and arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungal interactions in plants overlap in a common symbiosis pathway (CSP) that leads to successful root nodule (RN) and AM symbioses (21, 24, 46). Similarly, the negative control of the degree of nodulation and mycorrhization of roots is also regulated through a common signaling system, so-called autoregulation of nodulation (42). These findings raise the question of whether molecular components regulating RN and AM symbioses also affect other symbiotic microbes in the phytosphere.
Diverse microorganisms reside in and on plants as endophytes and epiphytes (11, 29, 35, 48). These symbiotic microbes assist plants in the uptake of nutrients (22), scavenge toxic compounds (5), and exert considerable influence upon the overall health of host plants (6). However, many questions remain about the driving forces and ecological rules underlying the relationships between these microbes and plants (12, 36).
Recently, it was shown that symbiosis-defective mutants of Medicago truncatula (30) and soybean (16, 32) possess bacterial and fungal communities in their roots different from those in wild-type host plants and that certain bacteria preferentially associate with mycorrhizal roots (41). These findings indicate that genetic alteration in RN/AM signaling pathways can also alter the microflora of the rhizosphere. Interestingly, analyses of the rhizosphere of soybeans indicated that the bacterial community structures of nonnodulated soybeans were more similar to those of hypernodulated soybeans than to those of wild-type soybeans (16). Since nodulation is autoregulated by signal transduction between root and shoot tissues (31), it is of interest to compare bacterial communities in shoots between wild-type and symbiosis-defective mutants. Indeed, the results of our previous study of stem- and leaf-associated bacteria suggested that a subpopulation of Proteobacteria in soybean was controlled through the system that regulates RN symbiosis (18–20).
Thus, it is worthwhile examining whether plant CSP mutants also change the microbial community in the phytosphere. The CSP plays an important role in accommodating RN and AM symbionts, by which plant cells actively decompose their cell wall structures to facilitate microbial colonization and endosymbiosis (34). It would be interesting to examine the intracellular and intercellular niches of the endophytic microbial communities that respond to CSP genes (19).
Orthologs of CSP are also well conserved in nonlegumes (50), and the equivalent functionality of these orthologs in nodulation and mycorrhization has been reported (3). Using rice mutant lines with a Tos17 insertion, the essentiality of calcium/calmodulin (CaM)-dependent protein kinase (CCaMK), a central factor of CSP, for mycorrhization has been proven (3).
In this study, the impacts of the CSP on plant-associated microbes in nonleguminous plants were examined. Strong expression of Oryza sativa CCaMK (OsCCaMK) was detected in rice roots not only under aerobic conditions, where mycorrhization is expected to occur (3), but also under the anaerobic conditions of a paddy field throughout the growth stages of rice (39). The stable and strong expression of OsCCaMK in rice roots (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material) implies its importance in rice. CCaMK is thought to be a decoder of Ca spiking signals, a distinctive physiological response to endosymbioses (13, 24), because of its structural similarity to CaMKII, which is activated by Ca oscillation in a frequency-dependent manner in animals (4).
The impacts of OsCCaMK genotype (dominant homozygous [D], heterozygous [H], and recessive homozygous [R]) on the root-associated bacterial community in rice plants were examined under both paddy and upland field conditions. Clone libraries of the 16S rRNA genes of bacteria were constructed for each OsCCaMK genotype, and community analyses were performed. The results clearly indicate that OsCCaMK has considerable impacts on both the diversity of root-associated bacteria and the growth of rice plants under both paddy and upland field conditions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Plant materials and field experimental design.
Mutants for a putative ortholog of CCaMK were screened from a library of O. sativa mutants tagged by an endogenous retrotransposon, Tos17 (14). Descendant seeds of a Tos17 mutant line (NE1115, H genotype) of Oryza sativa subsp. japonica cv. Nipponbare were sown. NE1115 has a Tos17 insertion mutation in the coding region of OsCCaMK (3). Seeds were placed on two layers of filter paper in a petri dish (diameter, 6 cm) containing 4 ml tap water on 15 April 2008, and the petri dishes were placed in an incubator at 30°C. After 2 days, the germinated seeds were sown in a commercial soil (No. 3; Mitsui-Toatsu, Tokyo, Japan) in a 60-cm by 30-cm cell tray (cell diameter, 1.5 cm; depth, 3 cm) and grown in a greenhouse under natural light for 4 weeks. During the seedling stage, DNA was isolated from leaf tissue by using a DNeasy plant minikit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer's manual, and the OsCCaMK gene was genotyped as previously reported (3). Seedlings of each genotype were planted in both paddy fields (dominant homozygous [PD], heterozygous [PH], recessive homozygous [PR]) and upland fields (dominant homozygous [UD], heterozygous [UH], recessive homozygous [UR]) at the National Agricultural Research Center, Tsukuba City, Japan, on 15 May 2008. These fields have been used to test the effects of N, P, and K on rice and winter wheat grown continuously for more than 30 years. Before the seedlings were planted, soil samples were collected, air dried, sieved through a 2-mm-mesh-size mesh, and analyzed (Table 1). Basal fertilizer [70 kg N/ha supplied as (NH4)2SO4, 150 kg/ha P2O5 supplied as superphosphate, 100 kg/ha K2O supplied as KCl] had been applied to the paddy field in May 2008 and to the upland field in October 2007, before seedlings were planted.
Table 1.
Field | pH |
Truog Pa | % total |
CN ratio | CECb | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H2O | KCl | N | C | ||||
Paddy | 6.1 | 5.6 | 28.8 | 0.3 | 4.3 | 14.3 | 27.0 |
Upland | 6.9 | 6.2 | 22.6 | 0.3 | 2.7 | 10.8 | 26.4 |
Soil phosphate content (mg P2O5 kg−1), determined by the Truog method.
CEC, cation exchange capacity in centimoles kg−1.
Growth evaluation and sampling.
To define the factors relevant to any changes in bacterial community structure, shoot length, tiller number, and shoot and root fresh weights were measured. Three plants per genotype were harvested on 6 August 2008 and immediately transported on ice to the laboratory. The roots were washed well with tap water and then stored at −80°C. Examination of the roots under a microscope showed no mycorrhizal infection in either field.
Clone library construction and sequencing.
Root tissues were ground to a powder in liquid nitrogen with a mortar and pestle. DNA was extracted from 0.5 g powdered tissue as described previously (15). The final DNA samples were resuspended in 100 μl sterilized water. The quality and quantity of DNA were assessed spectrophotometrically from the absorbance at 260 nm (A260) and from the A260/A230 and A260/A280 ratios. DNA extraction and PCR amplification were independently carried out for individual plants of each genotype in triplicate. PCR clone libraries for 16S rRNA genes were constructed as follows. Briefly, 25 ng total bacterial DNA was used as a template in a final reaction volume of 12.5 μl, including 25 pmol of each primer and 1 U of Ex Taq DNA polymerase (Takara Bio, Otsu, Japan) with the universal primers 27F (5′-AGAGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG-3′) and 1525R (5′-AAGGAGGTGWTCCARCC-3′) (25). The cycling conditions were an initial denaturation for 2 min at 94°C; 25 cycles of 30 s at 94°C, 30 s at 55°C, and 2 min at 72°C; and a final extension for 10 min at 72°C. The three PCR products derived from the triplicate DNA samples were combined, and the PCR products were resolved by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis in 0.5× TBE (44.5 mM Tris-borate, 0.1 mM EDTA) buffer. PCR products of the predicted size (∼1,500 bp) were extracted from the gels by using a NucleoSpin Extract II extractor (Macherey-Nagel GmbH & Co. KG, Düren, Germany) and ligated into the pGEM-T Easy plasmid vector (Promega Japan, Tokyo, Japan) at 25°C for 1 h. A partial sequence of the 16S rRNA gene from 192 randomly selected clones was determined by Takara Bio Inc. using the 27F forward primer as a sequencing primer. Sequences were manually edited to eliminate primer sequences and low-quality regions. Approximately 650 bases of the 16S rRNA gene (corresponding to bases 160 to 793 of the Escherichia coli 16S rRNA gene) were then used for the sequence analyses.
Sequence analysis.
Sequences were examined for orientation and non-16S rRNA gene sequences by using OrientationChecker software (2). The presence of chimeras was assessed by Mallard software (2). A sequence identified at the 99.9% threshold was discarded as chimeric. The remaining sequences were aligned by using the CLUSTAL W program (44). A distance matrix based on the alignment was constructed by using the DNADIST program from the PHYLIP (version 3.66) package (http://evolution.genetics.washington.edu/phylip.html) with the default parameters. The resulting matrices were run in Mothur software (40) to generate diversity indexes. Library coverage was calculated with the nonparametric estimator C (9). The reciprocal of Simpson's index (1/D) was used as a measure of diversity to evaluate the level of dominance in a community (49). The UniFrac software tool (26) was used to examine similarities between clone libraries. Principal coordinate analysis (PCA) was performed in UniFrac with the abundance-weighted option.
Phylogenetic analysis.
The phylogenetic composition of the sequences in each library was evaluated by using the Classifier program of the RDP-II (release 10) package (47) with confidence levels of 80%. The BLASTN (1) program was also used to classify the clones and to identify the closest relatives in the GenBank database. For the phylogenetic analysis, sequences were aligned by CLUSTAL W (44). The neighbor-joining method was used to build the trees (38). The PHYLIP format tree output was obtained by using the bootstrapping procedure (7) with 1,000 bootstrap trials. The trees were constructed in TreeView software (33).
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.
The nucleotide sequences of the 16S rRNA genes in the clone libraries have been deposited in DDBJ under the accession numbers shown in Table 2.
Table 2.
OsCCaMK genotype | Paddy field | Upland field |
---|---|---|
D | AB598995 to AB599101 (PD) | AB599321 to AB599452 (UD) |
H | AB599102 to AB599201 (PH) | AB599453 to AB599584 (UH) |
R | AB599202 to AB599320 (PR) | AB599585 to AB599685 (UR) |
RESULTS
Plant growth.
In the paddy field, shoot and root weights tended to be lower in PH and PR plants than in PD plants (Fig. 1 C and D). In the upland field, all growth measurements were significantly lower in UR plants than in UD plants (Fig. 1). The growth of UH plants was intermediate, suggesting a gene-dosage-dependent effect on growth by OsCCaMK.
Statistics on clone libraries.
The clone library coverage of all three genotypes in the paddy field (41.1% to 49.6%) was lower than that in the upland field (56.1% to 67.3%) (Table 3). Among paddy field genotypes, there were no noticeable differences in three of the four diversity indexes. Among upland field genotypes, UR plants tended to have lower values of diversity indexes than the other genotypes. Interestingly, both PR and UR plants had noticeably lower 1/D values than the other plants.
Table 3.
Statistical parameter | Paddy field |
Upland field |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PD | PH | PR | UD | UH | UR | |
No. of sequences | 107 | 100 | 119 | 132 | 132 | 101 |
% library coveragea | 41.1 | 45 | 49.6 | 61.4 | 56.1 | 67.3 |
No. of OTUsb (≥95% identity) | 79 | 72 | 77 | 74 | 82 | 53 |
Diversity indices | ||||||
Chao1c | 256.5 | 220.5 | 273.7 | 189.9 | 232.3 | 93.6 |
ACEc | 329.6 | 207.7 | 262.4 | 197.5 | 216.1 | 133.6 |
Shannon index (H′) | 4.2 | 4.1 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.2 | 3.7 |
Simpson index (1/D) | 101.3 | 115.1 | 46.2 | 62.7 | 87.3 | 37.1 |
Coverage (Cx) = 1 − (nx/N), where nx is the number of singletons that are encountered only once in a library and N is the total number of clones.
OTUs were defined at ≥97% sequence identity.
Chao1 and ACE (abundance-based coverage estimator) are nonparametric estimators of species richness (40).
Phylogenetic diversities of bacteria with different OsCCaMK genotypes.
The phylogenetic diversity of rice root-associated bacteria, including endophytes and epiphytes, was evaluated under the impacts of different genotypes for OsCCaMK. The relative abundance of Alphaproteobacteria was significantly lower in PR (0.8%) and UR (3.0%) plants than in PD (10.3%) and UD (17.4%) plants (Table 4). The abundance of Betaproteobacteria was also noticeably (but not significantly) lower in PR (19.3%) and UR (6.9%) plants than in PD (26.2%) and UD (13.6%) plants. Conversely, the abundance of Actinobacteria and Chloroflexi was greater in PR and UR plants than in PD and UD plants (Table 4). In addition, the abundance of Firmicutes was significantly greater in PR plants (5.9%) than in PD plants (0.9%).
Table 4.
* and ** indicate statistical significance at the 1 and 5% levels (P < 0.01 and P < 0.05), respectively, calculated with Fisher's exact test, between dominant homozygous (PD and UD) plants and heterozygous or recessive (PH-PR and UH-UR) plants. Shading indicates the relative abundances that were changed according to OsCCaMK genotypes (see the text).
Further analyses at lower taxonomic levels revealed that population shifts of the Sphingomonadales and Rhizobiales were mainly responsible for the low abundance of Alphaproteobacteria in PR and UR plants (Fig. 2 A). Population shifts of the Rhodocyclales and Burkholderiales were responsible for the slight reduction of betaproteobacterial abundance in PR and UR plants, respectively (Fig. 2B). The abundance of Clostridia (Firmicutes) was significantly greater in PR plants than in PD plants, and the abundance of Anaerolineae (Chloroflexi) was greater in PR and UR plants than in PD and UD plants (Fig. 3 A). In contrast, the population shift of the Actinosynnemataceae (9.9% for Saccharothrix spp. and 5% for unclassified Actinosynnemataceae in UR plants) was the main cause of the higher abundance of Actinomycetes in UR plants than in UD and UH plants (Fig. 3B). Clustering analyses at the species level did not identify a specific operational taxonomic unit (OTU) that could explain the significance of community shifts among genotypes in most of the taxonomic groups described above owing to the low library coverage (Table 3), except among the Actinosynnemataceae (Fig. 4). All three OTUs in the Actinosynnemataceae (in particular, ACT3) were more abundant in UR plants than in UD plants (Fig. 4). The representative sequences of these OTUs showed high similarity to Lentzea spp. (99% for ACT1 and 98% for ACT2) or to Saccharothrix espanaensis (97% for ACT3). Interestingly, the relative abundances of Alphaproteobacteria, Betaproteobacteria, Anaerolineae, and Actinosynnemataceae in UH plants were intermediate between those of the other genotypes, suggesting a gene-dosage-dependent effect of the OsCCaMK gene (Fig. 2 and 3).
The results of principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) clearly showed that the field environment (paddy versus upland) was the dominant force defining bacterial community structures in rice roots, as explained by principal coordinate 1 (PC1; 55.8%; Fig. 5). However, unidirectional shifts responding to the OsCCaMK genotype were also evident under both field conditions, as explained by PC2 (18.1%). The results also revealed a greater impact of OsCCaMK genotype on UR plants than on UD plants (Fig. 5).
DISCUSSION
Recent advances in plant genomics reveal that a series of genes required for both RN and AM symbioses in legumes are also conserved in a wide range of nonlegume species, including rice (50). The equivalent functionality of these orthologous genes between legumes and nonlegumes has been confirmed (3, 10): among CSP genes of rice, OsCASTOR, OsPOLLUX, and OsCCaMK are involved in mycorrhization in rice roots (3, 10). Nonlegumes are ideal materials for examining the effects of CSP genes on plant-associated bacterial communities because they obviate the disturbance of roots by rhizobial infection.
Preliminary experiments conducted in a phytotron under both paddy and upland field conditions produced almost identical growth among plant genotypes and revealed no significant differences in root-associated microbial community structure, as assessed by DNA fingerprinting (data not shown). In contrast, field experiments showed considerable effects of the OsCCaMK genotype on both rice plant growth and root-associated bacterial communities; in particular, plant growth under upland conditions showed a gene dosage effect (Fig. 1A, B, and D). Under paddy field conditions, the impacts of OsCCaMK genotypes were less clear, but shoot and root fresh weights of PH and PR plants tended to be less than those of PD plants (Fig. 1C and D). The diminished growth of the mutants suggests the important role of CCaMK in plants in the response to environmental stresses, since the growth of mutants was diminished more severely under field and upland conditions than under phytotron and paddy conditions. In plant physiology, it has been speculated that putative orthologs of CaMKII, such as CCaMK, play an important role in the response to environmental stresses (28). The possibility of the involvement of plant-associated microbes in the diminished growth of the OsCCaMK mutants should be examined in future studies, in light of the data from the present study.
The statistics for the clone libraries also showed the clear effects of genotype on the diversity indexes of UR plants, implying the importance of OsCCaMK to bacterial community structure. The results make more sense if OsCCaMK is less important under paddy conditions, since CCaMK is essential for arbuscular mycorrhization, which is more likely to occur under upland conditions (3, 10).
Surprisingly, phylogenetic analyses revealed almost no Alphaproteobacteria in PR or UR plants (Table 4), despite their being a ubiquitous bacterial group in common environments, including the rhizosphere and phytosphere (8, 19, 48), as observed in PD and UD plants (Table 4). This low abundance of Alphaproteobacteria in R plants was mainly caused by population shifts of the Sphingomonadales and Rhizobiales among the genotypes (Fig. 2A); no clone belonging to the Sphingomonadales was found in PR or UR plants. These two orders are generally considered to be the dominant taxonomic groups in the phytosphere, so their absence is unusual (17–20, 27, 43) and might imply the importance of OsCCaMK for interactions with plant-associated Alphaproteobacteria.
In contrast, under both field conditions, the abundance of obligate anaerobic bacteria in Clostridia or the Anaerolineae was noticeably greater in R plants than in D plants (Fig. 3A). Obligate anaerobic bacteria have been found as endophytes in several plant species (37). Under upland conditions, an actinobacterial population belonging to the Actinosynnemataceae was greatly increased in UR plants (Fig. 3B). These results suggest that OsCCaMK significantly affects the community structures of root-associated bacteria under both paddy and upland conditions at the level of phylum or class. Moreover, clustering analyses of Actinosynnemataceae species revealed that the abundance of specific OTUs clearly responded to the OsCCaMK genotype under upland conditions (Fig. 4). Detailed phylogenetic analysis of this family indicated that a specific population of Saccharothrix was highly sensitive to the OsCCaMK genotype at the species level, and distinct taxonomic groups in Lechevalieria and Lentzea were also sensitive (see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material). Interestingly, species in these genera have been reported to be potential sources of antimicrobial compounds (23, 45).
As expected, PCoA indicated that the field environmental conditions are the dominant force in shaping the communities of root-associated bacteria. However, the results also revealed that the OsCCaMK genotype caused similar unidirectional shifts in community structure under both paddy and upland conditions (PC2, 18.1%; Fig. 5). Thus, the OsCCaMK genotype affects both the species richness and species abundance of similar taxonomic bacterial groups in the roots of rice plants under both field conditions, regardless of the wide environmental differences between the conditions. The effect of genotype was partly reflected by the fact that the population of Alphaproteobacteria was drastically diminished in PR and UR plants (Fig. 2A). The results of PCoA also suggest that the OsCCaMK genotype more severely affected bacteria under upland conditions, as shown by a broader cluster in the upland field (UD, UH, and UR in Fig. 5) than in the paddy field (PD, PR, and PH). This difference suggests that OsCCaMK is more important under aerobic conditions than under anaerobic conditions. These results are again consistent with the fact that both RN and AM symbioses are generally considered to occur under aerobic conditions.
Another point of interest in the results of PCoA is that under upland conditions, the three genotypes were well correlated with PC2, showing a gene-dosage-dependent effect (UD, UH, and UR in Fig. 5). The effect was also reflected in plant growth under upland conditions (Fig. 1) and was correspondingly shown in the abundance of several taxonomic groups (Fig. 2A and B and 3A and B). The CCaMK protein has a dominant function in nodule organogenesis and in successful infection for both RN and AM symbioses in legumes (13). Therefore, the OsCCaMK heterozygous genotype may have less of an impact on rhizobial and arbuscular mycorrhizal infections, but it may have some effects on other plant-associated bacteria. Alternatively, for unknown reasons it may be critical when plants are grown under natural conditions, as observed in the differences in plant growth between field and phytotron conditions.
These results show the importance of OsCCaMK for regulating both plant growth and the community structure of root-associated bacteria in rice plants under both paddy field and upland conditions. The results and previous data (18–20) strongly suggest that the manipulation of genetic factors underlying RN and AM symbioses would have significant effects on the diversity of plant-associated microbes. To investigate the roles of such plant genes in interacting with plant-associated Alphaproteobacteria such as the Sphingomonadales, the significance of the diversity and functionality of plant-associated Alphaproteobacteria in relation to rice plant growth should be examined. Such studies will reveal novel plant-microbe interactions and could ultimately allow ecological engineering of plant symbiotic microbes to introduce beneficial traits into host plants.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported in part by a grant from the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries of Japan (Genomics for Agricultural Innovation, PMI-0002), by Special Coordination Funds for Promoting Science and Technology, by PROBRAIN, and by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) 22580074 and (A) 23248052 from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture of Japan.
We thank S. Inaba (Tohoku University) for soil analysis.
Footnotes
Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://aem.asm.org/.
Published ahead of print on 6 May 2011.
REFERENCES
- 1. Altschul S. F., Gish W., Miller W., Myers E. W., Lipman D. J. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215:403–410 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Ashelford K. E., Chuzhanova N. A., Fry J. C., Jones A. J., Weightman A. J. 2006. New screening software shows that most recent large 16S rRNA gene clone libraries contain chimeras. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72:5734–5741 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Banba M., et al. 2008. Divergence of evolutionary ways among common sym genes: CASTOR and CCaMK show functional conservation between two symbiosis systems and constitute the root of a common signaling pathway. Plant Cell Physiol. 49:1659–1671 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. De Koninck P., Schulman H. 1998. Sensitivity of CaM kinase II to the frequency of Ca2+ oscillations. Science 279:227–230 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Delmotte N., et al. 2009. Community proteogenomics reveals insights into the physiology of phyllosphere bacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106:16428–16433 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Diene O., Takahashi T., Yonekura A., Nitta Y., Narisawa K. 2010. A new fungal endophyte, Helminthosporium velutinum, promoting growth of a bioalcohol plant, sweet sorghum. Microbes Environ. 25:216–219 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Felsenstein J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783–791 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Giovannoni S. J., et al. 2005. Genome streamlining in a cosmopolitan oceanic bacterium. Science 309:1242–1245 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Good I. J. 1953. The population of frequencies of species and the estimation of population parameters. Biometrika 40:237–264 [Google Scholar]
- 10. Gutjahr C., et al. 2008. Arbuscular mycorrhiza-specific signaling in rice transcends the common symbiosis signaling pathway. Plant Cell 20:2989–3005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Hallmann J., Quadt-Hallmann A., Mahaffee W. F., Kloepper J. W. 1997. Bacterial endophytes in agricultural crops. Can. J. Microbiol. 43:895–914 [Google Scholar]
- 12. Hardoim P. R., Van Overbeek L. S., Van Elsas J. D. 2008. Properties of bacterial endophytes and their proposed role in plant growth. Trends Microbiol. 16:463–471 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Hayashi T., et al. 2010. A dominant function of CCaMK in intracellular accommodation of bacterial and fungal endosymbionts. Plant J. 63:141–154 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Hirochika H. 2001. Contribution of the Tos17 retrotransposon to rice functional genomics. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 4:118–122 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Ikeda S., Watanabe K. N., Minamisawa K., Ytow N. 2004. Evaluation of soil DNA from arable land in Japan using a modified direct-extraction method. Microbes Environ. 19:301–309 [Google Scholar]
- 16. Ikeda S., et al. 2008. Microbial community analysis of field-grown soybeans with different nodulation phenotypes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74:5704–5709 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Ikeda S., et al. 2009. Development of a bacterial cell enrichment method and its application to the community analysis in soybean stems. Microb. Ecol. 58:703–714 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Ikeda S., et al. 2010. Community shifts of soybean stem-associated bacteria responding to different nodulation phenotypes and N levels. ISME J. 4:315–326 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Ikeda S., et al. 2010. Community- and genome-based views of plant-associated bacteria: plant-bacterial interactions in soybean and rice. Plant Cell Physiol. 51:1398–1410 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Ikeda S., et al. 2011. Autoregulation of nodulation interferes with impacts of nitrogen fertilization levels on leaf-associated bacterial community in soybean. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77:1973–1980 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Imaizumi-Anraku H., et al. 2005. Plastid proteins crucial for symbiotic fungal and bacterial entry into plant roots. Nature 433:527–531 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Isawa T., et al. 2010. Azospirillum sp. strain B510 enhances rice growth and yield. Microbes Environ. 25:58–61 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Janso J. E., Carter G. T. 2010. Biosynthetic potential of phylogenetically unique endophytic actinomycetes from tropical plants. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76:4377–4386 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Kouchi H., et al. 2010. How many peas in a pod? Legume genes responsible for mutualistic symbioses underground. Plant Cell Physiol. 51:1381–1397 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Lane D. J. 1991. 16S/23S rRNA sequencing, p. 115–175 In Stackebrandt E., Goodfellow M., (ed.), Nucleic acid techniques in bacterial systematics. Wiley, Chichester, United Kingdom [Google Scholar]
- 26. Lozupone C., Knight R. 2005. UniFrac: a new phylogenetic method for comparing microbial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71:8228–8235 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Lu Y., Rosencrantz D., Liesack W., Conrad R. 2006. Structure and activity of bacterial community inhabiting rice roots and the rhizosphere. Environ. Microbiol. 8:1351–1360 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Luan S., Kudla J., Rodriguez-Concepcion M., Yalovsky S., Gruissem W. 2002. Calmodulins and calcineurin B-like proteins: calcium sensors for specific signal response coupling in plants. Plant Cell 14(Suppl.):S389–S400 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Mano H., Tanaka F., Nakamura C., Kaga H., Morisaki H. 2007. Culturable endophytic bacterial flora of the maturing leaves and roots of rice plants (Oryza sativa) cultivated in a paddy field. Microbes Environ. 22:175–185 [Google Scholar]
- 30. Offre P., et al. 2007. Identification of bacterial groups preferentially associated with mycorrhizal roots of Medicago truncatula. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73:913–921 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Oka-Kira E., Kawaguchi M. 2006. Long-distance signaling to control root nodule number. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 9:496–502 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Okubo T., et al. 2009. Nodulation-dependent communities of culturable bacterial endophytes from stems of field-grown soybeans. Microbes Environ. 24:253–258 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Page R. D. M. 1996. TreeView: an application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers. Bioinformatics 12:357–358 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Parniske M. 2000. Intracellular accommodation of microbes by plants: a common developmental program for symbiosis and disease? Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 3:320–328 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Rosenblueth M., Martinez-Romero E. 2006. Bacterial endophytes and their interactions with hosts. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 19:827–837 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Saito A., Ikeda S., Ezura H., Minamisawa K. 2007. Microbial community analysis of the phytosphere using culture-independent methodologies. Microbes Environ. 22:93–105 [Google Scholar]
- 37. Saito A., et al. 2008. Broad distribution and phylogeny of anaerobic endophytes of cluster XIVa clostridia in plant species including crops. Microbes Environ. 23:73–80 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Saitou N., Nei M. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4:406–425 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Sato Y., et al. 2011. RiceXPro: a platform for monitoring gene expression in japonica rice grown under natural field conditions. Nucleic Acids Res. 39:D1141–D1148 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Schloss P. D., et al. 2009. Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75:7537–7541 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Sheublin T. R., Sanders I. R., Keel K., van deer Meer J. R. 2010. Characterization of microbial communities colonising the hyphal surfaces of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. ISME J. 4:752–763 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Stougaard J. 2001. Genetics and genomics of root symbiosis. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 4:328–335 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Sun L., et al. 2008. Endophytic bacterial diversity in rice (Oryza sativa L.) roots estimated by 16S rDNA sequence analysis. Microb. Ecol. 55:415–424 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Thompson J. D., Higgins D. G., Gibson T. J. 1994. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22:4673–4680 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Ting A., Tan S., Wai M. 2009. Isolation and characterization of Actinobacteria with antibacterial activity from soil and rhizosphere soil. Aust. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 3:4053–4059 [Google Scholar]
- 46. Tirichine L., et al. 2006. Deregulation of a Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent kinase leads to spontaneous nodule development. Nature 441:1153–1156 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Wang Q., Garrity G. M., Tiedje J. M., Cole J. R. 2007. Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73:5261–5267 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Whipps J. M., Hand P., Pink D., Bending G. D. 2008. Phyllosphere microbiology with special reference to diversity and plant genotype. J. Appl. Microbiol. 105:1744–1755 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Zhou J., et al. 2002. Spatial and resource factors influencing high microbial diversity in soil. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68:326–334 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Zhu H., Riely B. K., Burns N. J., Ane J. M. 2006. Tracing nonlegume orthologs of legume genes required for nodulation and arbuscular mycorrhizal symbioses. Genetics 172:2491–2499 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.