Abstract
The Arabidopsis homeotic genes APETALA3 (AP3) and PISTILLATA (PI) are B genes which encode MADS-box transcription factors and specify petal and stamen identities. In the current study, the stamen carpelloid (SC) mutants, HGMS and AMS, of B. rapa and B. napus were investigated and two types of AP3 genes, B.AP3.a and B.AP3.b, were functional characterized. B.AP3.a and B.AP3.b share high similarity in amino acid sequences except for 8 residues difference located at the C-terminus. Loss of this 8 residues in B.AP3.b led to the change of PI-derived motifs. Meanwhile, B.AP3.a specified petal and stamen development, whereas B.AP3.b only specified stamen development. In B. rapa, the mutations of both genes generated the SC mutant HGMS. In B. napus that contained two B.AP3.a and two B.AP3.b, loss of the two B.AP3.a functions was the key reason for the apetalous mutation, however, the loss-of-function in all four AP3 was related to the SC mutant AMS. We inferred that the 8 residues or the PI-derived motif in AP3 gene probably relates to petal formation.
Introduction
The origin and evolution of petals in angiosperms remain elusive [1], [2]. Most flowers contain four types of floral organs, the sepal, petal, stamen and carpel, which are arranged in four concentric whorls. The classic ABC model proposes that three classes of floral homeotic genes coordinate with each other to specify the four floral organs: class A genes specify sepals, A+B genes together specify petals, B+C genes combine to specify stamens, and C genes alone specify carpels [3]–[7]. APETALA3 (AP3) and PISTILLATA (PI), both MADS-box transcription factors, are class B genes in Arabidopsis thaliana and are involved in conferring petal and stamen identities. Mutations in these two genes exhibit similar homeotic conversions of petals to sepals and stamens to carpels [8]–[10].
Phylogenetic analyses suggest that the ABC class genes have undergone multiple duplication events and functional divergence during their evolution [11]–[15].The paralogous lineages AP3 and PI arose from an ancestral class B gene duplication event before the origin of the angiosperms [16]–[19]. Subsequently, a major gene duplication event in the AP3 lineage gave rise to the paralogous lineages TM6 (tomato MADS box gene 6) and euAP3 and coincided with the base of the higher eudicot radiation [20]–[22]. A number of higher eudicot species, such as tomato and petunia, contain both euAP3 and TM6 genes [21]–[23]. Interestingly, Arabidopsis and Antirrhinum, the two well-known model plants for studying flower development, contain only euAP3 genes [24], [25]. In tomato, loss of TAP3 (of the euAP3 lineage) function results in the conversions of petals to sepals and stamens to carpels, but loss of TM6 function only causes the homeotic transition of stamens to carpels and has little effect on perianth development [20]. In petunia, either PhDEF (euAP3 lineage) or PhTM6 (Petunia hybrida TM6) specifies stamen identity, but PhDEF has a redundant function of specifying petal development [25]–[26]. In the higher eudicots, similar to tomato and petunia, the TM6 gene appears to specify stamen identity in the same way as the paleoAP3 gene does, and the euAP3 genes appear to specify stamen and petal identities [1]. In addition, the evolutionary origin of the higher eudicot petals coincides with a TM6/euAP3 duplication event and the appearance of the euAP3 genes [17], [27], [28]. This leads to the hypothesis that the euAP3 genes have acquired a petal-specific function, compared with paleoAP3 genes.
The TM6 and euAP3 lineages possess a distinct feature in their C-termini [24], [29]. Like paleoAP3 lineages, the TM6 lineage also contains a paleoAP3 motif, which is present in AP3 proteins throughout the lower eudicots, magnoliid dicots, monocots and basal angiosperms. In contrast, the euAP3 lineage contains a euAP3 motif, which is exclusively found in AP3 proteins isolated from the higher eudicots and is most likely evolved from a translational frame shift mutation [29], [30]. A chimeric euAP3 gene, which contains the paleoAP3 C-terminal sequence instead of that of euAP3 (including a euAP3 motif and a PI-derived motif, which is defined as a region bearing similarity with the conserved PI-motif in the PI lineage), can partially rescue stamen development but is not sufficient to restore petal identity in the ap3-3 mutant of Arabidopsis [24]. This suggests that the C-termini of euAP3 proteins, particularly the euAP3 motif and/or PI-derived motif, probably play a role in the capacity of euAP3 to specify petal development. However, two recent results also show that the C-terminal motif of euAP3 is dispensable for its function in floral organ identity [31], [32]. So far, the exact mechanism behind the newly acquired role of euAP3 in petal development is still uncertain.
When B class genes are lost, stamens are transformed into carpels and mutant plants exhibit a stable and complete male sterility phenotype. We are, therefore, interested in utilizing these male sterile mutant lines in our Brassica family hybrid breeding efforts. More recently, we isolated SC mutants from diploid Brassica rapa and allotetraploid Brassica napus, and bred a homeotic genic male sterile line (HMGS) of B. rapa and an apetalous male sterile line (AMS) of B. napus [33], [34]. Each of the HGMS and AMS lines displays a stably 1∶1 (fertile versus SC sterile plants) segregating line. In HGMS, the SC sterile plants exhibited transformations of petals into sepals and stamens into carpels, whereas, in AMS the SC plants showed petal-less and stamen-to-carpel phenotypes.
With these unique genetic resources in hand, we are in a good position to explore the mechanism of floral organ formation in Brassica, especially petal and stamen development. In the current report, a series of studies were performed, including genetic characterization, expression and sequence analysis of B class genes (AP3 and PI) in HGMS and AMS lines as well as their hybrids. We show that two highly similar AP3 genes (B.AP3.a and B.AP3.b) specified petal and stamen development in Brassica. Homeotic mutants of HGMS in B. rapa and AMS in B. napus were caused by loss of the two AP3 functions, and the 24-bp sequence difference between them probably determined whether they specified petal formation.
Results
Origin and floral identities of SC mutants of Brassica rapa and Brassica napus
During our breeding experiments with the B. rapa variety “Wuyueman”, we recovered a natural SC mutant in a large selfing population. To maintain this mutant, we identified two kinds of maintainers in the same population as the SC mutant. The two maintainer plants pollinated the SC plant, and the resulting F1 generations both gave rise to fertile and SC sterile plants in a 1∶1 ratio. Each of the two lines was subsequently sustained by inter-sibling crossing at every generation, and the SC plants could be maintained at 50% at every generation (Table S1). The two 1∶1 segregated lines were named HGMS and HGMS2. The SC sterile plants in HGMS and HGMS2 had an identical phenotype and named HGMSa, whereas the two fertile maintainer plants were somewhat different and named HGMSb and HGMSb2, respectively.
The HGMSa mutation was also crossed with the fast-flowering B. rapa variety “Siyueman”, and we once again recovered anther different 1∶1 segregating line HGMSII from their F2 generation in the same way as the HGMS line described above. The fertile and SC sterile plants in HGMSII were named HGMSIIb and HGMSIIa respectively. The differences between HGMSII and HGMS could be largely attributed to their different genetic backgrounds.
The flowers of fertile HGMSb and HGMSIIb plants were morphologically similar to those of WTc (Wild type of B. rapa, Figure 1A–C). In HGMSa plants, however, the petals were extremely small, with elongated epidermal cells and stomas, both characteristics of the sepals rather than the petals (Figure 1D–E). In addition, HGMSa stamens were replaced by the carpels, with green ovule-like structures inside (Figure 1F). Thus, HGMSa flowers displayed a typical homeotic conversion of petals to sepals and stamens to carpels.
In HGMSIIa flowers, the petals were smaller than those of WTc and similar in size to the sepals, and they had irregularly shaped but elongated epidermal cells and stomas (Figure 1G–H), once again indicating a conversion of petals to sepals. The stamens also underwent a carpel-like transition. Interestingly, the transition was seemingly not as dramatic as that of HGMSa. The upper half of the carpel-like structure resembled the carpel with ovules, but at the base of the carpel-like structure were filament-like tissues (Figure 1I). Taken together, the phenotypes of HGMSIIa flowers display an incomplete transition of petals to sepals and stamens to carpels.
In the maintainer plant HGMSb2 (Figure 1J), the petals were sepal-sized and had malformed epidermal cells and stomas (Figure 1K), suggesting a transformation of petals into sepals. On the other hand, HGMSb2 stamens developed almost normally and produced pollen (Figure 1L).
During another breeding experiment in B. napus, we identified a petal-less mutant and bred a stably inherited apetalous line, Apt. In a large selfing population of Apt, we also recovered a natural SC mutant. By identifying a maintainer plant, we also established a 1∶1 segregating line, AMS (Table S1). The fertile and SC sterile plants in this line were named AMSb and AMSa, respectively. Besides the apparent petal-less phenotype, the flowers of the Apt line were otherwise identical to those of the wild-type WTn (Figure 1M–N). Reflecting the genetic background of Apt, the flowers of both AMSb and AMSa did not develop petals (Figure 1O–P). In addition to the petal-less phenotype, the stamens of AMSa were transformed into carpels with apparent ovule-like structures attached, whereas the stamens of AMSb developed almost normally (Figure 1P). The phenotype of AMSa suggested a homeotic conversion of stamens to carpels.
Genetic characterization of SC mutants of B. rapa and B. napus
To determine the inheritance modes of our mutants, we carried out crosses between the mutants and different wild-type varieties of B. rapa and B. napus. In the case of B. rapa, the wild-type varieties Aj, Lx, ez1 and ey5 were crossed with HGMSa, and their F1 generations showed normal flowers, and SC sterile plants segregated in the F2 generations. The F2 segregation ratios of fertile and SC sterile plants in the four crosses were 13.4∶1, 13.5∶1 and 16.8∶1 and 14.9∶1, in accordance with a ratio of 15∶1 (Table 1). When F1 plants were backcrossed with sterile HGMSa plants, the segregation ratios of the four BC1 populations were 3.4∶1, 3.3∶1, 3.7∶1, and 3.0∶1, in agreement with a ratio of 3∶1. These results indicate that the SC phenotype of the HGMSa mutant was probably controlled by two pairs of recessive genes.
Table 1. Segregations of fertile and SC sterile plants in BC1 and F2 generations of HGMS hybrids and AMS hybrids.
Female parent | Male parent | BC1 | F2 | ||||||||
Fertile plant | Sterile plant | Fertile/sterile | Expected value | χ2 | Fertile plant | Sterile plant | Fertile/sterile | Expected value | χ2 | ||
HGMS | Aj | 518 | 154 | 3.4∶1 | 3∶1 | 1.45 | 389 | 29 | 13.4∶1 | 15∶1 | 0.23 |
Lx | 441 | 120 | 3.3∶1 | 3∶1 | 0.75 | 269 | 20 | 13.5∶1 | 15∶1 | 0.122 | |
ez1 | 129 | 35 | 3.7∶1 | 3∶1 | 0.98 | 252 | 15 | 16.8∶1 | 15∶1 | 0.09 | |
ey5 | 30 | 10 | 3.0∶1 | 3∶1 | 0.03 | 134 | 9 | 14.9∶1 | 15∶1 | 0.023 | |
AMS | S3B | 145 | 12 | 12.1∶1 | 15∶1 | 0.309 | 2532 | 10 | 253.2∶1 | 255∶1 | 0.019 |
S4B | 488 | 25 | 19.5∶1 | 15∶1 | 1.433 | 1455 | 7 | 207.9∶1 | 255∶1 | 0.109 | |
K407 | 369 | 27 | 13.7∶1 | 15∶1 | 0.132 | 1936 | 8 | 242∶1 | 255∶1 | 0.001 |
Note: χ2 0.05,1 = 3.84; sterile plant means the SC sterile plant.
In the case of AMSa, when the wild-type B. napus varieties S3B, S4B and K407 were crossed with AMSa, their F1 generations showed normal flowers, and SC sterile plants segregated in the F2 generation. The F2 segregation ratios of fertile and SC sterile plants of the three crosses were 253.2∶1, 207.9∶1 and 242∶1, supporting a ratio of 255∶1 (Table 1). When F1 plants were backcrossed with AMSa plants, the segregation ratios of the BC1 populations in the three crossings were 12.1∶1, 19.5∶1 and 13.7∶1, fitting a ratio of 15∶1. These results indicate that the SC phenotype of the AMSa mutant was likely controlled by four pairs of recessive genes.
The PI gene is expressed normally in SC mutants of B. rapa and B. napus
Although the genetic mechanism behind the SC phenotypes of HGMSa and AMSa were different, both of them had the same SC phenotypes. According to the classic ABC model, class B genes (AP3 and PI) specify petal and stamen development. Mutations of AP3 and/or PI genes in Arabidopsis exhibit similar homeotic transformations of petals to sepals and stamens to carpels [3], [10]. Surprisingly, our mutants also displayed similar homeotic transformations as those of AP3 and/or PI mutants, so we examined the expression pattern of AP3 and PI genes in these mutants of B. rapa and B. napus.
To investigate PI expression, we carried out semi-quantitative RT-PCR amplifications using cDNAs from HGMSa, AMSa and wild-type plants of B. rapa and B. napus as templates. With PI-specific primers, all samples gave an apparently identical RT-PCR amplification product. Subsequent sequencing of the RT-PCR products revealed 100% identity of PI sequences among the mutants and the wild-type plants. These data indicate that the PI expression did not change in SC mutants of B rapa and B. napus (results not shown).
Expression and distribution of two types of AP3 genes in mutants of B. rapa
To examine AP3 expression, semi-quantitative RT-PCR were also performed using the AP3-specific primers AP3-F and AP3-R. We detected two major PCR products from wild-type B. rapa (WTc) and named the longer fragment as D1 and the shorter fragment as D2 (Figure 2A). In contrast to WTc, the maintainer plant HGMSb only contained one major D1 band. The maintainer plant HGMSIIb had a strong D1 band but also had a very weak D2. The differences among HGMSa, HGMSIIa, HGMSb2 and WTc were much more dramatic. We did not detect any AP3 RT-PCR products in HGMSa, but only a very low level of D2 in HGMSIIa was detected. The maintainer plant HGMSb2 contained only a D2 band, and its expression was higher than in HGMSIIa but lower than in WTc. The expression of cytosolic 18S rRNA gene was used as a control, and its expression was comparable in all samples (Figure 2A).
Sequence analysis of all RT-PCR samples showed that D1 bands from WTc, HGMSb and HGMSIIb were all identical, with a length of 699 bp. D2 bands from WTc and HGMSIIb and HGMSIIa and HGMSb2 were all identical, with a length of 675 bp.
Interestingly, the nucleotide sequences of D1 and D2 showed 91% identity. The differences between D1 and D2 included 38 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) (Figure S1), three of which caused amino acid substitutions, as well as a conspicuous 24-bp (8 amino acid residues) insertion/deletion near their C-termini (Figure 2B; Figure S1 and S2). Blasting the D1 and D2 sequences at the B.rapa genome database (http://brassicadb.org.brad/), the result revealed that the two sequences were same as two AP3 genes Bra007067 and Bra014822 (Figure S1 and S2), which located at the A09 and A04 chromosomes of B.rapa, respectively. Meanwhile the D1 and/or D2 sequences had also been identified in B. napus (DQ372719, AY313940, DQ372720, AF124814 and AY313941), B. rapa (AY623003), B. oleracea (U67453 and U67455) and B. juncea (DQ060332). And we also confirmed the presence of D1 and D2 in the four species of Brassica by RT-PCR (data not shown). These indicate that the D1 and D2 RT-PCR products represented two homologous AP3 genes in B. rapa. We thus named the two genes BraA.AP3.a and BraA.AP3.b according to the standardized gene nomenclature for the Brassica genus,which built by Ostergaard and King (2008) [35].
Further amplification of genomic DNAs from HGMSa and WTc showed that BraA.AP3.a of HGMSa had a 16-bp deletion in the first exon from bp 36 to 51 (BraA.AP3.a-16; Figure 2C and Figure S3), and BraA.AP3.b of HGMSa had a 51-bp insertion, which contained a 40-bp AT repeat sequence, in the first intron (Figure 2C and Figure S3). With the designed forward primer 24-F at the 16-bp deletion region of BraA.AP3.a-16 and reverse primer 24-R with the special 24-bp sequence of BraA.AP3.a to amplify genomic DNAs of all the materials (Figure 2D), WTc, and HGMSb and HGMSIIb all showed one clear BraA.AP3.a band. However, no bands were detected in HGMSa, HGMSIIa and HGMSb2, indicating that the BraA.AP3.a genes in them underwent a 16-bp deletion.
We designed another reverse primer, R670, against a region after the first intron of BraA.AP3.a, and used 24-F and R670 primers to amplify genomic DNAs of all the materials again (Figure 2D). WTc showed one band (containing BraA.AP3.a and BraA.AP3.b), whereas HGMSa, HGMSIIa and HGMSb2 lost this band, but each had an additional BraA.AP3.b+51 band, which was slightly larger than that of WTc, indicating that the BraA.AP3.b gene in them underwent a 51-bp insertion.
Take together, the above results show that mutations in BraA.AP3.a and BraA.AP3.b were related to SC mutants of B. rapa.
Expression and distribution of four AP3 genes in mutants of B. napus
The aberrant expression of BraA.AP3.a and BraA.AP3.b in our B. rapa mutants prompted us to look into the expression of AP3 homologous genes in our B. napus mutants. AP3 homologues in B. napus were amplified by semi-quantitative RT-PCR using the AP3-specific primers AP3-F and AP3-R. We again detected two bright PCR bands in the wild-type B. napus (WTn, Figure 3A), which were named D3 and D4, respectively. In contrast, Apt, AMSb and AMSa plants lacked D3 but contained D4 and one additional band of approximately 800-bp, which we named D5.
To further investigate the natures of the D3, D4 and D5 bands, we sequenced them and found that the D3 band of WTn was 699-bp, and the D4 bands of WTn, Apt, AMSb and AMSa were all 675-bp long, whereas the D5 bands of Apt, AMSb and AMSa were 785-bp.
Further sequence analysis revealed that D4 of WTn contained two kinds of highly homologous AP3 genes (96.7% identity and 21 single-nucleotide polymorphisms, two of which changed amino acids; Figure 3D and Figures S4, S5). Of the two AP3 genes, one was identical to the BraA.AP3.b gene of B. rapa as well as the AP3 sequences of B. rapa (AY60003) and B. napus (DQ372720); the other shared 99.4% identity with AP3 genes in B. oleracea (Bou67455) and B. napus (AY313941), and contained only two SNP (one amino acid substitution; data not shown). These results indicate that WTn of B. napus contains two types of AP3 genes with the 24-bp deletion identity: one is identical to BraA.AP3.b of B. rapa, named BnaA.AP3.b; whereas the other, which we named BnaC.AP3.b, is highly homologous to that of B. oleracea (Figure S4).
Similarly, we also found that D3 sequences of WTn also contained two types of AP3 genes (97.4% identical and 10 single-nucleotide polymorphisms, and no amino acid change; Figure 3E and Figures S5, S6). One was the same as the BraA.AP3.a gene of B. rapa, the other was the same as the AP3 gene of B. oleracea (Bou67453). After using 24-F and 24-R primers, which specifically amplified AP3 genes with the 24-bp special sequence, to amplify genomic DNA from WTn, two clear PCR bands were obtained (Figure 3B), confirming that WTn of B. napus contains two AP3 genes: one is identical to BraA.AP3.a of B. rapa, and the other, which we named BnaC.AP3.a, is the same as that of B. oleracea. Taken together, we have identified four AP3-like genes from B. napus: BnaA.AP3.b, BnaC.AP3.b, BnaA.AP3.a and BnaC.AP3.a (Figure S4 and S5).
Sequencing of the D5 band from Apt plants showed that the D5 sequence was exactly the same as BnaC.AP3.a except for an 86-bp insertion in its second exon (Figure 3E and S6). Using the 24-bp-specific primers 24-F and 24-R, only one clear band could be amplified from Apt genomic DNA, which was slightly larger than the BnaC.AP3.a band of WTn, and sequencing confirmed that this band corresponded to the D5 band of RT-PCR (Figure 3B). These findings suggest that Apt had at least lost the BnaA.AP3.a copy of the AP3 gene and that the BnaC.AP3.a copy of AP3 contained an 86-bp insertion. Subsequently, sequencing of the Apt D4 band showed that Apt contained both BnaA.AP3.b and BnaC.AP3.b. BnaA.AP3.b of Apt was the same as that of WTn. However, when compared with WTn, BnaC.AP3.b of Apt contained a single-nucleotide mutation in which the 80th nucleotide transformed from G into T and the corresponding 27th amino acid from glycine into valine, and this mutant form of Apt BnaC.AP3.b was named BnaC.AP3.b-Mu (Figure 3D and S4). Taken together, the loss of the BnaA.AP3.a gene, along with the mutations of BnaC.AP3.a and BnaC.AP3.b, was correlated with the apetalous identity of Apt. We did not detect a mutation or expression change of BnaA.AP3.b, suggesting that this gene was still functional and probably responsible for the normal development of Apt stamens.
The possible losses of the three AP3-like genes in Apt raised the question about the fate of the fourth AP3 gene BnaA.AP3.b in the SC mutant AMSa. To address this question, we carried out PCR amplification of Apt, AMSb and AMSa genomic DNA templates with AP3-F and AP3-R primers. We observed three bands in Apt and AMSb. In AMSa, we detected the top two bands, but not the smallest fragment (Figure 3C). Sequencing analysis showed that the three bands found in Apt and AMSb corresponded to D5, BnaC.AP3.b-Mu and BnaA.AP3.b, whereas the two bands in AMSa corresponded to D5 and BnaC.AP3.b-Mu, with the BnaA.AP3.b band absent in AMSa (Figure 3C). The failure to amplify BnaA.AP3.b from AMSa suggests that it may have been lost. As we indicated earlier, the Apt background was associated with the disturbance of three AP3 genes: BnaA.AP3.a, BnaC.AP3.a and BnaC.AP3.b. The loss of the fourth AP3 gene, BnaA.AP3.b, and the phenotype of AMSa plants suggest that the disruption of all four AP3 genes is correlated with the SC identity of AMSa.
Two types of AP3 genes controlling stamen and/or petal development
The amino acid sequences of BraA.AP3.a and BnaA.AP3.a and BnaC.AP3.a were identical, and those of BraA.AP3.b and BnaA.AP3.b and BnaC.AP3.b were also the same except for three amino acid differences (Figure S5). For simplicity, BraA.AP3.a and BnaA.AP3.a and BnaC.AP3.a were combined as B.AP3.a, whereas BraA.AP3.b and BnaA.AP3.b and BnaC.AP3.b were combined as B.AP3.b. The SC mutants of B. rapa and B. napus were all related to abnormal B.AP3.a and B.AP3.b gene expression. To further investigate the functions of the two genes, SC mutants of B. rapa and B. napus were reciprocally crossed.
In the F1 generation of AMSa×HGMSb, HGMSa×AMSb, AMSa×HGMSIIb and HGMSIIa×AMSb, fertile and SC plants segregated at a ratio of 1∶1 (F1 plants designations are indicated in Table 2 and Figure 4A). This segregation ratio indicated that the gene loci that caused SC mutations of AMSa and HGMSa and HGMSIIa were the same and were probably situated on the A-genome chromosome.
Table 2. Fertile plants and SC sterile plants of F1 hybrids of AMS with HGMS and HGMSII.
Combination | Fertile plant | Sterile plant | Fertile/sterile | Expected value | χ2 | ||
name | number | name | number | ||||
AMSa×HGMSb | AHb | 36 | AHa | 35 | 1.029∶1 | 1∶1 | 0.01 |
HGMSa×AMSb | HAb | 11 | HAa | 19 | 0.579∶1 | 1∶1 | 2.13 |
AMSa×HGMSIIb | AHIIb | 49 | AHIIa | 56 | 0.875∶1 | 1∶1 | 0.47 |
HGMSIIa×AMSb | HAIIb | 20 | HAIIa | 37 | 0.541∶1 | 1∶1 | 5.07 |
Note: Sterile plants: SC sterile plants. Fertile plant and sterile plant were HAb and HAa in HGMSa×AMSb, AHb and AHa in AMSa×HGMSb, AHIIb and AHIIa in AMSa×HGMSIIb, and HAIIb and HAIIa in HGMSIIa×AMSb.
Due to the abolished expression of B.AP3.a and B.AP3.b, HGMSa exhibited homeotic transformations of petal into sepal and stamen into carpel. In contrast, HGMSb expressed just one B.AP3.a gene, and its petal and stamen developed normally. In AMSa×HGMSb, fertile plants AHb had a normal-expressing B.AP3.a gene, which came from male parent HGMSb (Figure 4B), and their petals and stamens developed normally in comparison with SC plants AHa (Figure 4A). Similarly, in AMSa×HGMSIIb, the fertile plants AHIIb also had a functional B.AP3.a gene from HGMSIIb (Figure S7), and thus their petals and stamens also developed normally. These results indicate that the B.AP3.a gene is sufficient to specify petal and stamen development.
The B.AP3.b gene was not expressed in AMSa, and this mutant line exhibited petal loss and SC identity. An AMSb line with a normal-expressing B.AP3.b gene showed an apetalous identity, and stamens developed normally. In HGMSa×AMSb, sterile AHa plants exhibited petal loss and SC identity, and fertile HAb plants showed a petal-to-sepal transition while stamens developed normally. Further, genomic DNA of HAb and HAa were amplified using AP3-F/R primers, and an extra band was obtained from the HAb plant (Figure 4C). Sequencing showed that the band was the genomic DNA of BnaA.AP3.b, which came from the male parent AMSb. Similarly, in HGMSIIa×AMSb, the fertile HAIIb plants with sepaloid petals and normally developed stamens also had a BnaA.AP3.b gene from AMSb (Figure S7). These data show that the only function of B.AP3.b is to specify stamen development and it has little effect on petal formation.
Discussion
Two types of AP3 genes specify petal and stamen development of Brassica
B. napus (AACC genome) is an allotetraploid species that originated from a spontaneous hybridization between B. rapa (AA genome) and B. oleracea (CC genome) and possesses the complete diploid chromosome sets of both parental genomes [36], [37]. Our results reveal two kinds of AP3 genes, B.AP3.a and B.AP3.b, specifying petal and stamen development in B. rapa and B. oleracea. It stands to reason that B. napus has four AP3 genes: BnaA.AP3.a and BnaA.AP3.b from B. rapa and BnaC.AP3.a and BnaC.AP3.b from B. oleracea. Therefore, this is a new evidence regarding the origin of B. napus.
Our results indicate that B.AP3.a specifies petal and stamen development, in parallel with AP3 function in Arabidopsis [3], and B.AP3.b only specifies stamen development, which concurs with the research results of Pylatuik (2003): when the AG::BnAP3 construct (B.AP3.b gene with an agamous promoter) was translated into ap3-1 mutants, it restored stamen development, but not petal development [38].
Mutations of B.AP3.a and B.AP3.b genes causing the SC mutants of B. rapa
With a 16-bp sequence deletion from the first exon of BraA.AP3.a and a 51-bp foreign sequence insertion in the first intron of BraA.AP3.b, the two AP3 genes were totally unexpressed, leading to a homeotic transition in HGMSa from petals to sepals and stamens to carpels. This is consistent with the genetic result that SC identity in HGMSa is controlled by two pairs of recessive genes: B.AP3.a and B.AP3.b. HGMSb expressed only a single B.AP3.a gene, which specified petal and stamen formation, so its petals and stamens developed normally. Moreover, HGMSb2 expressed only a single B.AP3.b gene, which specified only stamen formation, so its stamens developed normally and petals transformed into sepals. If P and S stand for B.AP3.a and B.AP3.b, and p and s stand for the mutant genes of B.AP3.a and B.AP3.b, the genotypes of HGMSa, HGMSb and HGMSb2 are presumed to be ppss, Ppss and ppSs, respectively (Figure 5).
HGMSb2 had one B.AP3.b gene, thus possessing normally developed stamens, and HGMSIIa had one low-expressed B.AP3.b gene, thus exhibiting stamen to carpel transformation. This indicates that the expression level of B.AP3.b is related to stamen development. Where B.AP3.b expression was decreased, it lost its function so that SC mutants were created. Therefore, HGMSIIa is a petal sepaloid and SC mutant resulting from the non-expression of B.AP3.a and lower expression of B.AP3.b. Therefore, it is assumed that the genotypes of HGMSIIb and HGMSIIa were Ppss and ppss (Figure 5).
Losing the two B.AP3.a functions is the key reason for the apetalous mutant Apt of B. napus
In Apt, BnaA.AP3.a was lost, the second exon of BnaC.AP3.a had an 86-bp foreign sequence, and surprisingly, the foreign sequence contained a 29-bp polA sequence. It is assumed that the foreign insertion probably led to a loss of BnaC.AP3.a function. Meanwhile, BnaC.AP3.b of Apt mutated at a single nucleotide, thus changing a single amino acid, which lay in an extremely conserved MADS-box domain. Thus, the mutation probably caused a loss of function of BnaC.AP3.b. These results show that losses of function of the three AP3 genes correlated with the apetalous mutant Apt, and losing the two B.AP3.a gene functions, which specially specified petal development, was the key reason for the petal-loss identity of Apt. In addition, BnaA.AP3.b of Apt was identical to that of WTn, and this was a possible reason for normal stamen development in the Apt plant.
Loss of four AP3 functions causing the SC mutant AMSa of B. napus
AMSb and AMSa originated from Apt and carried loss-of-function mutations of BnaA.AP3.a, BnaC.AP3.a and BnaC.AP3.b. Compared with AMSb, AMSa once again lost BnaA.AP3.b. As a result, the four AP3 genes of AMSa totally lost their functions. This was the primary reason for the SC mutant AMSa and was consistent with the genetic result that SC identity in AMSa was controlled by four pairs of recessive genes. These four pairs of genes of AMSa were the four AP3 genes: two B.AP3.a and two B.AP3.b. It is presumed that the genotypes of AMSa, AMSb, Apt and WTn were ppppssss, ppppSsss, ppppSSss and PPPPSSSS, respectively (Figure 5).
The 24-bp insertion or PI-derived motif probably plays a key role in petal formation
PaleoAP3 and euAP3, although they share significant sequence similarity, are characterized by the PI-derived motif and AP3 motif in the C- termini of their proteins. PaleoAP3 lineage gene (including TM6) contains paleoAP3 motif, whereas euAP3 lineage gene has a euAP3 motif instead of the paleoAP3 motif. PaleoAP3 specifies stamen development, but euAP3 specifies petal and stamen development [1], [17], [24]. Does the euAP3 motif contribute to petal development? B.AP3.a and B.AP3.b had the same euAP3 motif (Figure 2B), and if the motif is related to petal formation, the two genes should certainly have the function of specifying petal development. However, the results of Pylatuik et al. (2003) and this study show that B.AP3.b probably does not specify petal formation [38]. Therefore, the euAP3 motif in the context of B.AP3.b is insufficient for petal development.
Does the PI-derived motif contribute to petal development? B.AP3.a and B.AP3.b are highly homologous while having a notable difference in function. Obviously, their sequence differences may contribute to their functional divergence. Surprisingly, the 24-bp divergence gave rise to different PI-derived motifs between B.AP3.a and B.AP3.b (Figure 2B). Again analyzing the research results of Lamb & Irish (2003), we found that where the C-terminus (amino acids 200–232) of AP3 is truncated, the 8-amino acid sequence was divided into two parts and damaged the PI-derived motif of euAP3 [24]. This might have led the constructed AP3CPALEO to lose its function of regulating petal development. These data indicate that the 24-bp sequence or PI-derived motif probably relates to petal development.
Due to the 24-bp difference existing natively and exhibiting two statuses before and after AP3 mutation, B.AP3.a may have originated from B.AP3.b with the 24-bp foreign insertion, and the insertion is probably related to the origin of the petal.
ABC model of Brassica flower development is controlled by two types of AP3 genes
There are two types of AP3 genes, B.AP3.a and B.AP3.b, specifying petal and stamen development in Brassica. The classic ABC model (Figure 6a) cannot perfectly explain floral development in Brassica. To make the model more suitable for Brassica plants, the two kinds of AP3 genes should be considered. B.AP3.a specifies petal and stamen development, whereas B.AP3.b specifies only stamen development. Usually, the two genes express together to specify petal and stamen development in Brassica plants (Figure 6b). With B.AP3.b lost and only B.AP3.a expressed, normal petals and stamens develop (Figure 6c); with B.AP3.a lost and only B.AP3.b expressed, stamens develop normally, but its petals transform into sepals (Figure 6d); and with both B.AP3.a and B.AP3.b lost, homeotic conversions of petals to sepals and stamens to carpels occur (Figure 6e).
Materials and Methods
Plant materials
B. rapa materials
Wild-type (WTc) B. rapa subsp. chinensis and three types of SC sterile 1∶1 lines (HGMS, HGMS2 and HGMSII) of B. rapa were used.
B. napus materials
Wild-type (WTn) B. napus, apetalous mutant of B. napus (Apt) and apetalous SC sterile 1∶1 segregating line (AMS) were used. Characteristics of all of the materials are shown in Table 3.
Table 3. Materials of B. napus and B. rapa.
Name | Source | Species | Whorl 2 | Whorl 3 |
WTc | Wild type of B. rapa | B. rapa subsp. chinensis (AA) | Petal | Stamen |
HGMSb | Fertile plants in HGMS | Petal | Stamen | |
HGMSa | SC sterile plants in HGMS | Sepal | Carpel | |
HGMSIIa | SC sterile plants in HGMSII | Sepaloid | Carpelloid | |
HGMSIIb | Fertile plants in HGMSII | Petal | Stamen | |
HGMSb2 | Another maintainer of HGMSa | Sepal | Stamen | |
WTn | Wild type of B. napus | B. napus (AACC) | Petal | Stamen |
Apt | Apetalous mutant of B. napus | Apetalous | Stamen | |
AMSb | Fertile plants in AMS | Apetalous | Stamen | |
AMSa | SC sterile plants in AMS | Apetalous | Carpel |
Note: Petal and stamen phenotypes were identified according to their morphological characteristics and appearance as observed by scanning electron microscope.
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)
Petals were picked from the flower buds, fixed with 3% glutaraldehyde at 4°C overnight, washed with 0.025 M PBS (phosphate buffered saline, pH 7.0) four times and incubated for 4 h in 1% osmic acid. Samples were washed again in 0.05 M PBS, dehydrated gradually in an ethanol series, dried in liquid carbon dioxide, sputter-coated with gold palladium, and observed with a JEOL JSM-6360LV scanning electron microscope.
Genetic analysis
After crossing the four selfing lines of B. rapa (Aj, Lx, ez1 and ey5) with HGMSa as well as the three selfing lines of B. napus (S3B, S4B and K407) with AMSa, the segregation of fertile versus SC sterile plants in each population of BC1 and F2 was examined.
RNA and DNA extraction and gene isolation
For each 1∶1 segregating line, fertile plants and SC sterile plants were identified and separated into two parts at the early stage of floral bud development, and for each of them, total RNA was extracted from its small younger floral buds using the RNAiso Reagent (TaKaRa). First-strand cDNA was synthesized by Prime Script RT-PCR kit (TaKaRa). At the same time, the genomic DNA of these materials was extracted.
Expression and isolation of AP3 genes
The AP3 gene-specific primers AP3-F (ATGGCGAGAGGGAAGATCCA) and AP3-R (TTATTCAAGAAGGTGGAAGGTAATGAT) were designed according to the sequences of AP3 genes (DQ372719, AY623003) from B. napus and B. rapa. The expression analysis of AP3 genes was conducted using reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The amounts of templates were carefully adjusted to match that of the control gene, the cytosolic 18S rRNA gene. Thirty-cycle RT-PCR was performed using AP3-F and AP3-R primers at the 61°C annealing temperature. PCR products were finally fractionated in 2.5% agarose for 4.5 h and digitally photographed. At the same time, the amplified AP3 gene fragments (about 675–800 bp) were excised and purified using an AxyPrep™ DNA Gel Extraction Kit (Axygen), cloned into the pGEM-T Easy Vector (Promega), and sequenced by Beijing Sunbiotech Co. Ltd. Similarly, full-length DNA sequences of AP3 genes were isolated.
To classify the two kinds of AP3 genes we had cloned, the special primers 24-F (AGAACCAGACCAACCGACAA), 24-R (CGTAAGCACGTGATCCTTCG) and R670 (AAAGTGTTTTCCATTTCTTCCTCAA) were designed. With the 24-F and 24-R primers, one kind of AP3 gene that contains the specific 24-bp sequence could be easily isolated.
Intercross analysis
To intercross AMS with HGMS and HGMSII, the four combinations AMSa×HGMSb, HGMSa×AMSb, AMSa×HGMSIIb and HGMSIIa×AMSb were generated artificially and sown in the field. Fertile plants and SC sterile plants in each combination were identified at the early stage of floral bud development, and their small younger buds were used for RNA extraction. During flowering, fertile and SC sterile plants were investigated.
Supporting Information
Acknowledgments
We thank Zhouping Shang Guan and Weiyong Xu for helpful comments on the manuscript.
Footnotes
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Funding: This work was supported by a grant from 863 National High-tech Research and Development Program (2009AA101105) and the fund of Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology for Agriculture (200701). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Hileman LC, Irish VF. More is better: The uses of developmental genetic data to reconstruct perianth evolution. American Journal of Botany. 2009;96:83–95. doi: 10.3732/ajb.0800066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Irish VF. Evolution of petal identity. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2009;60:2517–2527. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erp159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Coen ES, Meyerowitz EM. The war of the whorls: Genetic interactions controlling flower development. Nature. 1991;353:31–37. doi: 10.1038/353031a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Honma T, Goto K. Complexes of MADS-box proteins are sufficient to convert leaves into floral organs. Nature. 2001;409:525–529. doi: 10.1038/35054083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Pelaz S, Ditta GS, Baumann E, Wisman E, Yanofsky MF. B and C floral organ identity functions require SEPALLATA MADS-box genes. Nature. 2000;405:200–203. doi: 10.1038/35012103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Theissen G, Saedler H. Floral quartets. Nature. 2001;409:469–471. doi: 10.1038/35054172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Weigel D, Meyerowitz EM. The ABCs of floral homeotic genes. Cell. 1994;78:203–209. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90291-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bowman JL, Smyth DR, Meyerowitz EM. Genetic interactions among floral homeotic genes of Arabidopsis. Development. 1991;112:1–20. doi: 10.1242/dev.112.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Goto K, Meyerowitz EM. Function and regulation of the Arabidopsis floral homeotic gene Pistillata. Genes & Development. 1994;8:1548–1560. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.13.1548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Jack T, Brockman LL, Meyerowitz EM. The homeotic gene APETALA3 of Arabidopsis thaliana encodes a MADS box and is expressed in petals and stamens. Cell. 1992;68:683–697. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90144-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Causier B, Castillo R, Zhou J, Ingram R, Xue Y, et al. Evolution in action: following function in duplicated floral homeotic genes. Current Biology. 2005;15:1508–1512. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2005.07.063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Irish VF, Litt A. Flower development and evolution: gene duplication, diversification and redeployment. Current Opinion in Genetics & Development. 2005;15:454–460. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2005.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Litt A, Irish V. Duplication and diversification in the APETALA1/FRUITFULL floral homeotic gene lineage: implications for the evolution of floral development. Genetics. 2003;165:821–833. doi: 10.1093/genetics/165.2.821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kim S, Yoo M, Albert V, Farris J, Soltis P, et al. Phylogeny and diversification of B-function MADS-box genes in angiosperms: evolutionary and functional implications of a 260-million-year-old duplication. American Journal of Botany. 2004;91:2102–2118. doi: 10.3732/ajb.91.12.2102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kramer E, Jaramillo M, Di Stilio V. Patterns of gene duplication and functional evolution during the diversification of the AGAMOUS subfamily of MADS box genes in angiosperms. Genetics. 2004;166:1011–1023. doi: 10.1534/genetics.166.2.1011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hernandez-Hernandez T, Martinez-Castilla L, Alvarez-Buylla E. Functional diversification of B MADS-box homeotic regulators of flower development: adaptive evolution in protein-protein interaction domains after major gene duplication events. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2007;24:465–481. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msl182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kramer EM, Dorit RL, Irish VF. Molecular evolution of genes controlling petal and stamen development: Duplication and divergence within the APETALA3 and PISTILLATA MADS-box gene lineages. Genetics. 1998;149:765–783. doi: 10.1093/genetics/149.2.765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Stellari G, Jaramillo M, Kramer E. Evolution of the APETALA3 and PISTILLATA lineages of MADS-box-containing genes in the basal angiosperms. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2004;21:506–519. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msh044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Winter K, Weiser C, Kaufmann K, Bohne A, Kirchner C, et al. Evolution of class B floral homeotic proteins: obligate heterodimerization originated from homodimerization. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2002;19:587–596. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Rasmussen DA, Kramer EM, Zimmer EA. One size fits all? Molecular evidence for a commonly inherited petal identity program in Ranunculales. American Journal of Botany. 2009;96:96–109. doi: 10.3732/ajb.0800038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.de Martino G, Pan I, Emmanuel E, Levy A, Irish VF. Functional analyses of two tomato APETALA3 genes demonstrate diversification in their roles in regulating floral development. Plant Cell. 2006;18:1833–1845. doi: 10.1105/tpc.106.042978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Vandenbussche M, Zethof J, Royaert S, Weterings K, Gerats T. The duplicated B-class heterodimer model: Whorl-specific effects and complex genetic interactions in Petunia hybrida flower development. Plant Cell. 2004;16:741–754. doi: 10.1105/tpc.019166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Hileman LC, Sundstrom JF, Litt A, Chen MQ, Shumba T, et al. Molecular and phylogenetic analyses of the MADS-Box gene family in tomato. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2006;23:2245–2258. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msl095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lamb RS, Irish VF. Functional divergence within the APETALA3/PISTILLATA floral homeotic gene lineages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2003;100:6558–6563. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0631708100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Rijpkema A, Gerats T, Vandenbussche M. Genetics of floral development in Petunia. Advances in Botanical Research: Incorporating Advances in Plant Pathology, Vol 44. 2006a;44:237–278. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Rijpkema AS, Royaert S, Zethof J, van der Weerden G, Gerats T, et al. Analysis of the Petunia TM6 MADS box gene reveals functional divergence within the DEF/AP3 lineage. Plant Cell. 2006b;18:1819–1832. doi: 10.1105/tpc.106.042937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kramer EM, Irish VF. Evolution of genetic mechanisms controlling petal development. Nature. 1999;399:144–148. doi: 10.1038/20172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kramer EM, Irish VF. Evolution of the petal and stamen developmental programs: Evidence from comparative studies of the lower eudicots and basal angiosperms. International Journal of Plant Sciences. 2000;161:S29–S40. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Vandenbussche M, Theissen G, Van de Peer Y, Gerats T. Structural diversification and neo-functionalization during floral MADS-box gene evolution by C-terminal frameshift mutations. Nucleic Acids Research. 2003;31:4401–4409. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kramer EM, Su HJ, Wu CC, Hu JM. A simplified explanation for the frameshift mutation that created a novel C-terminal motif in the APETALA3 gene lineage. Bmc Evolutionary Biology. 2006;6:00. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-6-30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Piwarzyk E, Yang YZ, Jack T. Conserved C-terminal motifs of the Arabidopsis proteins APETALA3 and PISTILLATA are dispensable for floral organ identity function. Plant Physiology. 2007;145:1495–1505. doi: 10.1104/pp.107.105346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Su K, Zhao S, Shan H, Kong H, Lu W, et al. The MIK region rather than the C-terminal domain of AP3-like class B floral homeotic proteins determines functional specificity in the development and evolution of petals. New Phytol. 2008;178:544–558. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02382.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Zhang YF, Wang XF, Zhang X, Li DR, Liang ZS. The discovery and study on homeotic mutant male sterile line HGMS of non-heading Chinese cabbage. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica. 2005;14:164–168 (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
- 34.Zhang WX, Li DR, Tian JH, Yang CL. The discovery and study of apetalous sterility mutant in Brassica napus L. Chinese journal of oil crop science. 2005;27:13–15 (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ostergaard L, King GJ. Standardized gene nomenclature for the Brassica genus. Plant Methods. 2008;4:1–4. doi: 10.1186/1746-4811-4-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Howell E, Kearsey M, Jones G, King G, Armstrong S. A and C genome distinction and chromosome identification in Brassica napus by sequential fluorescence in situ hybridization and genomic in situ hybridization. Genetics. 2008;180:1849–1857. doi: 10.1534/genetics.108.095893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Snowdon R, Friedrich T, Friedt W, Khler W. Identifying the chromosomes of the A-and C-genome diploid Brassica species B. rapa (syn. campestris) and B. oleracea in their amphidiploid B. napus. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 2002;104:533–538. doi: 10.1007/s00122-001-0787-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Pylatuik JD, Lindsay DL, Davis AR, Bonham-Smith PC. Isolation and characterization of a Brassica napus cDNA corresponding to a B-class floral development gene. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2003;54:2385–2387. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erg254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.