Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2009;48(13):2359–2363. doi: 10.1002/anie.200804689

A Phosphine-Mediated Conversion of Azides to Diazo-Compounds**

Eddie L Myers 1, Ronald T Raines 2,*
PMCID: PMC3128508  NIHMSID: NIHMS148772  PMID: 19035612

Diazo-compounds are remarkably versatile intermediates in organic synthesis, participating in a variety of thermal, photochemical and metal-catalyzed rearrangement, addition, cycloaddition and insertion reactions, typically with concomitant expulsion of N2.[1] They have been found in nature, examples of which include azaserine[2] and members of the kinamycin[3] and lomaiviticin[4] families of marine natural products. Depending upon their stability and coexisting functional groups, diazo-compounds can present a challenge with respect to their preparation and isolation. Current methods include (a) diazo-transfer,[5] (b) diazotization,[6] (c) decomposition[7] or oxidation[8] of hydrazones, (d) rearrangement of N-alkyl N-nitroso-compounds,[9] (e) fragmentation of 1,3-disubstituted alkyl aryl-triazenes,[10] and (f) elaboration of more readily available diazo-compounds (Scheme 1).[11]

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Methods for preparing diazo-compounds.

The preparation of diazo-compounds via the fragmentation of triazenes is uncommon. This route was described originally by Baumgarten, who isolated ethyl diazoacetate by the acid-catalyzed fragmentation of an aryl-triazene derivative (Scheme 1, Eq. 1).[10a] More recent work by Bräse demonstrated that similar solid-supported triazenes, specifically those substituted with electron-deficient aryl groups, also undergo fragmentation under basic conditions (Scheme 1, Eq. 2).[10b] The triazene precursors can be prepared by the addition of nitrogen-based nucleophiles to aryl diazonium salts or by the addition of organometallic species to azides with subsequent trapping of the resulting triazenyl anion with electrophiles, the former being the more popular approach.[12] These methods have limited synthetic utility. Herein we report a convenient synthetic route to 1,3-alkyl-acyl triazenes that uses azides as substrates and employs mild conditions; furthermore, we disclose that these acyl triazenes undergo thermal or base-catalyzed fragmentation in situ to form diazo-compounds in high yield.

We reasoned that triazenes (and thus diazo-compounds) might be accessible from the phosphazides produced by the highly chemoselective reaction of a phosphine and azide. Much of the chemistry associated with this partnership emanates from an iminophosphorane, a species generated by the rapid extrusion of N2(g) from the phosphazide.[13] An obvious requirement for accessing triazenes would be the avoidance of N2(g)-extrusion. Although we were encouraged by numerous reports in the literature on the isolation and trapping of phosphazides, typically achieved through careful choice of both the phosphine and the azide components,[14] we were intrigued by doing so via an intramolecular acylation event reminiscent of the Staudinger ligation (Scheme 2).[15]

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

Reactions of phosphines and azides.

Phosphines employed in the Staudinger ligation possess an O- or S-ester proximal to the phosphorus. This ester is reactive enough to trap the iminophosphorane but not the foregone phosphazide, whence extrusion of N2 is the faster process (Scheme 2).[16] We anticipated that the presence of a more potent acylating moiety could entice the phosphazide to form a triazenophosphonium species, which upon hydrolysis would provide an acyl triazene (Scheme 2). The electron distribution in acyl triazenes is similar to that in the triazenes employed by Baumgarten and Bräse (Scheme 1[10]), and we suspected that they too would be competent precursors of diazo-compounds.

We began our study by investigating the reaction of azido glycine derivative 2a with a series of phosphines that contained ester substituents of increasing leaving-group ability (Scheme 3). As expected, the reaction of azide 2a and phosphinoester 1a, the latter being of the type used in a Staudinger ligation, provided the amide 3 as the predominant product (~90% yield). Early success was achieved with phosphinothioester 1b: upon allowing the reaction mixture to stir beyond the time necessary for complete consumption of the phosphine, the solution gradually turned a yellow color, indicative of the presence of diazo-compound. Chromatography and subsequent analysis confirmed the presence of diazo-compound 5a (30% yield) along with primary amide 4 (33% yield) and Staudinger ligation product 3 (60% yield). Ultimately, using phosphine-N-hydroxysuccinimyl ester 1c, conditions were developed that provided diazo-compound 5a in excellent yield. For this particular combination, a white precipitate formed after a few hours in 1,4-dioxane/H2O or THF/H2O solvent mixtures. Upon allowing the mixture to stir for a few days, the suspension eventually gave way to a clear yellow solution. After some experimentation, we found that treating the suspension with sat. aq. NaHCO3 or NEt3 (2 equiv), facilitated the formation of the diazo-compound within minutes.

Scheme 3.

Scheme 3

Distribution of products for the reaction of phosphines with azide 2a (NHS = N-hydroxy succinimyl).

The aforementioned white precipitate and presumed precursor to the diazo-compound was tentatively characterized as acyl triazene 6 (Scheme 4). The 1H NMR spectrum of the intermediate, acquired in CDCl3 at 25 °C, was broad and exhibited a conspicuous downfield signal at ~13.4 ppm. Lowering the temperature to −6 °C led to decoalescence and sharpening of the spectrum to reveal a pair of isomers, in a ratio of 3:1, exhibiting downfield signals at ~13.5 ppm and ~12.8 ppm, respectively, that disappear following a “D2O shake”. Acyl alkyl-triazenes and alkyl aryl-triazenes are known to exist in solution as a mixture of tautomers, wherein the acidic proton resides on either terminus of the triazene moiety.[14f,17] Unfortunately, we failed in our attempts to obtain crystals of the intermediate that were suitable for X-ray crystallography, due in part to its thermal instability. When, however, aryl azide 7 was allowed to react with phosphine 1c, acyl triazene 8 was isolated in excellent yield by column chromatography, and its structure was confirmed by X-ray crystallography (Scheme 4). The 1H NMR spectrum of acyl triazene 8 exhibited a downfield signal at ~12.9 ppm, providing strong evidence that the asserted precursor to diazo-compound 5a is indeed acyl triazene 6.

Scheme 4.

Scheme 4

Synthesis of aryl acyl triazene 8.

Although the yield of diazo-compound 5a from azide 2a was satisfactory, the rate of reaction was unacceptably low. By following the progress of the reaction of 1c and 2a by 31P NMR spectroscopy, we observed that only 50% conversion to acyl triazene 6 was achieved after 100 min. We attributed this low reaction rate to delocalization of electron density from the phosphorous atom into the electron-deficient aromatic ring, thereby slowing down its addition to the azide. Accordingly, we designed an alternative reagent in which the phosphine and activated-ester moieties were not in conjugation. Phosphine 1e (Scheme 5), prepared in excellent yield by 1,4-addition of diphenylphosphine to methyl acrylate followed by saponification and carbodiimide-mediated esterification, reached 50% conversion in its reaction with 2a after just 20 min. Hence, phosphine 1e is a preferred reagent for mediating the conversion of an azide to a diazo-compound.

Scheme 5.

Scheme 5

Further reaction of diazo-compound 5a.

Conducting the reaction in a wet solvent (THF/H2O) and using near equimolar amounts of phosphine (1.05 equiv) were found to be crucial for effectuating good conversion to diazo-compound. When the reaction of azide 2a was conducted under anhydrous conditions (e.g., in CH2Cl2), diazo-compound 5a was formed quickly in situ, presumably via fragmentation of the putative acyl triazenophosphonium salt (Scheme 2). Unfortunately, although the phosphine was consumed completely, the yield of diazo-compound 5a was moderate (~50%) and a substantial amount of the azide starting material was reisolated (~10–15%). Subsequent investigation revealed the origin of the diminished conversion: phosphine 1e (and 1c) reacted with diazo-compound 5a at a rate that was comparable to that of its reaction with azide 2a to give a compound whose spectroscopic data were consistent with acyl hydrazone 9 (Scheme 5).[14a,18] Under wet conditions and preceding basic workup, the thermal decomposition of acyl triazene 6 (the hydrolysis product of the acyl triazenophosphonium salt) is slow, allowing near complete consumption of azide and phosphine before accumulation of. appreciable concentrations of the diazo-compound.

The mechanism of fragmentation of acyl triazene 6 under thermal conditions presumably involves scission of the pertinent N–N bond to give the diazonium salt and the conjugate base of primary amide 4 (4-CB) followed by proton transfer to give diazo-compound 5a and 4 (Scheme 6). As acyl triazene 6 is likely to be relatively acidic, the fragmentation might be acid-catalyzed and thus autocatalytic.[19] In a basic environment, the acyl triazene 6 would exist primarily as its conjugate base (6-CB), albeit in equilibrium with 6. Deprotonation of 6 at theα-carbon would give the alternative conjugate base 6-CB′. In a manner reminiscent of the Bamford–Stevens reaction—the base catalyzed fragmentation of p-toluenesulfonylhydrazones[7a]—such a species could undergo N–N scission to give diazo-compound 5a. Alternatively, unstable 6-CB′ could arise directly from 6-CB via an intramolecular proton transfer. For certain substrates the latter might be a contributory pathway under the conditions prior to basic workup (vide infra).

Scheme 6.

Scheme 6

Putative mechanistic scheme for the thermal or base-catalyzed fragmentation of acyl triazene 6.

The scope of the reductive fragmentation reaction was found to be quite general. Using phosphine 1e, α-azido esters and lactones (5d–g, Scheme 7) were converted to their diazo-compound derivatives in excellent yield. As complete consumption of the azide was achieved within a few hours and the side products were relatively polar (primary amide, hydrolyzed phosphine reagent, and/or trace amounts of hydrazone), short-path column chromatography was sufficient in providing diazo-compound in excellent purity. α-Azido ketones proved to be problematic due to the difficulty of avoiding pre-workup fragmentation to a diazo-compound and subsequent reaction to form an acyl hydrazone, as in Scheme 5. Nevertheless, α-diazo cyclohexanone 5h and α-diazo acetophenone 5i were obtained in yields of 67% and 49% respectively. For the latter, conducting the reaction in anhydrous toluene followed by column chromatography proved to be slightly superior with respect to yield. In addition to the glycine derivative 2a, other azido-amides were found to be excellent substrates. For example, the azido-amide derivative of phenylalanine 2b was transformed to diazo-compound 5b in 81% yield. It was observed that a prolonged basic workup (sat. aq. NaHCO3, overnight) was required for fragmentation of the putative triazene, presumably due to steric hindrance at the pertinent site of deprotonation. In contrast, an alternative workup involving isolation of the crude triazene and its treatment with the much stronger base DBU (1.2 equiv) in CH2Cl2 furnished 5b within a few minutes and in 85% yield; NEt3 was ineffectual in this instance. Similarly, azido lactam 2c (with DBU workup) gave the diazo-compound 5c in 95% yield.

Scheme 7.

Scheme 7

Scope of diazo-compound formation mediated by phosphine 1e. Footnotes: a) Workup: DBU (1.2 equiv), CH2Cl2, 20 min; b) Conditions: 1e (1.05 equiv), toluene, 0 °C to rt; c) 1e (1.1 equiv).

To probe the scope of the reaction even further, we investigated the synthesis of semi-stabilized diazo-compounds. Treatment of 9-azido-fluorene 2j with phosphine 1e under anhydrous conditions at low temperature (toluene, 0 °C), followed by loading the red solution directly on basic alumina (Grade 5) and eluting with 10% CH2Cl2/hexanes, 9-diazo-fluorene 5j was isolated in 85% yield and excellent purity (96%). Apparently, thermal fragmentation of the putative triazenophosphonium salt, which more than likely exists in its neutral λ5-phosphorane form,[16] is suppressed sufficiently for this substrate under the reaction conditions. The low temperature and low polarity of the solvent probably contribute to that greater stability. Under the standard conditions (THF/H2O), incomplete conversion of the azide 2j and contamination of the diazo-compound 5j with substantial amounts of other products, probably arising from alterative triazene decomposition and dimerization of the diazo-compound, were apparent. Finally, a vinylogous diazo-carbonyl compound 5k (96% purity) was prepared in good yield from anthraquinone-based azide 2k using the standard conditions.

Benzyl azide, whose pertinent hydrogens are relatively non-acidic, was converted in good yield to acyl triazene 10 and, unsurprisingly, failed to undergo smooth conversion to the diazo-compound under the standard conditions (Scheme 8). Yet, when a solution of 10 in toluene was heated to 80 °C in the presence of phenylalanine carboxylic acid derivative 11, the benzyl ester 12 was isolated in 50% yield. Presumably, under the latter conditions the acyl triazene undergoes protic acid-induced fragmentation to the benzyl diazonium salt and primary amide followed by rapid alkylation of carboxylate.[19] These conditions might also be conducive towards alkylation of triazene, homolytic fragmentation of triazene (to give amidyl and alkyl radicals),[20] and 1,3-acyl migration processes,[20a] some of which might contribute to the moderate conversion to ester 12.

Scheme 8.

Scheme 8

Acyl triazenes as precursors to alkyl diazonium salts.

To conclude, we have developed a mild method for the conversion of azides to their diazo-compound derivatives using a phosphine reagent. This “deimidogenation” reaction is highly selective in most chemical environments and thus allows for the synthesis of diazo-compounds in the presence of delicate functionality, which is a challenge given current methodology. Along those lines, we are in the process of preparing water-soluble phosphine reagents for applications in chemical biology,[21] a field already adept at the emplacement of the target azide moiety on biomolecules.[22]

Experimental Section

Experimental details can be found in Supporting Information

Supplementary Material

supplement

Footnotes

**

We thank Dr. Ilia A. Guzei and Amit Choudhary for X-ray data pertaining to triazene 8 and Dr. Annie Tam for preparing azide 2d. We acknowledge use of the National Magnetic Resonance Facility (NMRFAM) and services of the Mass Spectrometry Facility in the Department of Chemistry. This work was supported by NIH grant GM044783; NMRFAM was supported by NIH grant P41RR02301.

Supporting information for this article is available on the WWW under http://www.angewandte.org or from the author.

Contributor Information

Dr. Eddie L. Myers, Department of Biochemistry, 433 Babcock Drive, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA

Prof. Ronald T. Raines, Department of Biochemistry, 433 Babcock Drive, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA. Department of Chemistry, 1101 University Avenue, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA.

References

  • 1.a) Regitz M, Maas G. Diazo Compounds: Properties and Synthesis. Academic Press; London: 1986. pp. 65–198. [Google Scholar]; b) Padwa A, Weingarten MD. Chem Rev. 1996;96:223–269. doi: 10.1021/cr950022h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Doyle MP, McKervey MA, Ye T. Modern Catalytic Methods for Organic Synthesis with Diazo Compounds. John Wiley & Sons; New York: 1998. [Google Scholar]; d) Davies HML, Beckwith REJ. Chem Rev. 2003;103:2861–2904. doi: 10.1021/cr0200217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e) Zhang Z, Wang J. Tetrahedron. 2008;64:6577–6605. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bartz QR, Elder CC, Frohardt RP, Fusari SA, Haskell TH, Johannessen DW, Ryder A. Nature. 1954;173:72–73. doi: 10.1038/173072b0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.a) Ito S, Matsuya T, Omura S, Otani M, Nakagawa A, Takeshima H, Iwai Y, Ohtani M, Hata T. J Antibiot. 1970;23:315–316. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.23.315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Gould SJ, Tamayo N, Melville CR, Cone MC. J Am Chem Soc. 1994;116:2207–2208. [Google Scholar]; c) Mithani S, Weeratunga G, Taylor NJ, Dmitrienko GI. J Am Chem Soc. 1994;116:2209–2210. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.He H, Ding WD, Bernan VS, Richardson AD, Ireland CM, Greenstein M, Ellestad GA, Carter GT. J Am Chem Soc. 2001;123:5362–5363. doi: 10.1021/ja010129o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.a) Regitz M. Angew Chem. 1967;79:786–801. [Google Scholar]; Angew Chem Int Ed. 1967;6:733–749. [Google Scholar]; b) Baum JS, Shook DA, Davies HML, Smith DH. Synth Commun. 1987;17:1709–1716. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.a) Curtius T. Ber. 1883;16:2230–2231. [Google Scholar]; b) Horning EC. Org Syn Coll. Vol. 3. Wiley; New York: 1955. p. 392. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.a) Bamford WR, Stevens TS. J Chem Soc. 1952:4735–4740. [Google Scholar]; b) Fulton JR, Aggarwal VK, de Vicente J. Eur J Org Chem. 2005:1479–1492. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.a) Holton TL, Shechter H. J Org Chem. 1995;60:4725–4729. [Google Scholar]; b) Furrow ME, Myers AG. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:12222–12223. doi: 10.1021/ja0459779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.De Boer TJ, Backer HJ. Org Synth, Coll. 1963;4:250–253. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.a) Baumgarten RJ. J Org Chem. 1967;32:484–485. [Google Scholar]; b) Schroen M, Bräse S. Tetrahedron. 2005;61:12186–12192. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.a) Kink J, Regitz M. Synthesis. 1985:569–585. [Google Scholar]; b) Ye T, McKervey MA. Tetrahedron. 1992;48:8007–8022. [Google Scholar]; c) Zhao Y, Wang J. Synlett. 2005:2886–2892. [Google Scholar]; d) Meyer ME, Ferreira EM, Stoltz BM. Chem Commun. 2006:1316–1318. doi: 10.1039/b517719g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e) Liu Y, Zhang Y, Jee N, Doyle MP. Org Lett. 2008;10:1605–1608. doi: 10.1021/ol800298n. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kimball DB, Haley MM. Angew Chem. 2002;114:3484–3498. [Google Scholar]; Angew Chem Int Ed. 2002;41:3338–3351. doi: 10.1002/1521-3773(20020916)41:18<3338::AID-ANIE3338>3.0.CO;2-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.a) Wamhoff H, Richardt G, Stölben S. Adv Heterocycl Chem. 1995;33:159–249. [Google Scholar]; b) Fresneda PM, Molina P. Syn Lett. 2004:1197–1218. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.a) Molina P, López-Leonardo C, Llamas-Botía J, Foces-Foces C, Fernández-Castaño C. Tetrahedron. 1996;52:9629–9642. [Google Scholar]; b) Mizuno M, Muramoto I, Kobayashi K, Yaginuma H, Inazu T. Synthesis. 1999:162–165. [Google Scholar]; c) Velasco MD, Molina P, Fresneda PM, Sanz MA. Tetrahedron. 2000;56:4079–4084. [Google Scholar]; d) Restituyo JA, Comstock LR, Peterson SG, Stringfellow T, Rajski SR. Org Lett. 2003;5:4357–4360. doi: 10.1021/ol035635s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e) Liu X, Thirupathi N, Guzei IA, Verkade JG. Inorg Chem. 2004;43:7431–7440. doi: 10.1021/ic0492845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f) Charafeddine A, Dayoub W, Chapuis H, Strazewski P. Chem Eur J. 2007;13:5566–5584. doi: 10.1002/chem.200700058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.a) Saxon E, Bertozzi CR. Science. 2000;287:2007–2010. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5460.2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Nilsson BL, Kiessling LL, Raines RT. Org Lett. 2000;2:1939–1941. doi: 10.1021/ol0060174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Köhn M, Breinbauer R. Angew Chem. 2004;116:3168–3178. doi: 10.1002/anie.200401744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew Chem Int Ed. 2004;43:3106–3116. doi: 10.1002/anie.200401744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lin FL, Hoyt HM, van Halbeek H, Bergman RG, Bertozzi CR. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127:2686–2695. doi: 10.1021/ja044461m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.a) Oddo G, Algerino A. Ber Dtsch Chem Ges B. 1936;69B:279–282. [Google Scholar]; b) Kelly MA, Murray M, Sinnott ML. J Chem Soc, Perkin Trans 2–. 1982:1649–1654. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.a) Krommes P, Lorberth J. J Organomet Chem. 1977;127:19–31. [Google Scholar]; b) Wittig G, Haag W. Chem Ber. 1955;88:1655–1666. [Google Scholar]; c) Staudinger H, Meyer J. Helv Chim Acta. 1919;2:619–635. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.a) Ozment JL, Schmeidekamp AM, Schultz-Merkel LA, Smith RH, Jr, Michejda CJ. J Am Chem Soc. 1991;113:397–405. [Google Scholar]; b) Smith RH, Jr, Wladkowski BD, Herling JA, Pfaltzgraff TD, Pruski B, Klose J, Michejda CJ. J Org Chem. 1992;57:654–661. [Google Scholar]; c) Bräse S, Dahmen S. Chem Eur J. 2000;6:1899–1905. doi: 10.1002/1521-3765(20000602)6:11<1899::aid-chem1899>3.0.co;2-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Rademann J, Smerdka J, Jung G, Grosche P, Schmid D. Angew Chem. 2001;113:390–394. doi: 10.1002/1521-3773(20010119)40:2<381::AID-ANIE381>3.0.CO;2-V. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew Chem Int Ed. 2001;40:381–385. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.a) Curtin DY, Druliner JD. J Org Chem. 1967;32:1552–1557. [Google Scholar]; b) Lu H, Li C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005;46:5983–5985. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.a) Antos JM, Francis MB. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:10256–10257. doi: 10.1021/ja047272c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Tam A, Soellner MB, Raines RT. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:11421–11430. doi: 10.1021/ja073204p. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.a) Laughlin ST, Agard NJ, Baskin JM, Carrico IS, Chang PV, Ganguli AS, Hangauer MJ, Lo A, Prescher JA, Bertozzi CR. Methods Enzymol. 2006;415:230–250. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(06)15015-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Francis M. In: Chemical Biology: From Small Molecules to Systems Biology and Drug Design. Schreiber SL, Kapoor TM, Wess G, editors. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2007. pp. 593–634. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

supplement

RESOURCES