Skip to main content
Current Genomics logoLink to Current Genomics
. 2011 Mar;12(1):30–43. doi: 10.2174/138920211794520178

Engineering Cold Stress Tolerance in Crop Plants

Gulzar S Sanghera 1, Shabir H Wani 2,*, Wasim Hussain 1, NB Singh 3
PMCID: PMC3129041  PMID: 21886453

Abstract

Plants respond with changes in their pattern of gene expression and protein products when exposed to low temperatures. Thus ability to adapt has an impact on the distribution and survival of the plant, and on crop yields. Many species of tropical or subtropical origin are injured or killed by non-freezing low temperatures, and exhibit various symptoms of chilling injury such as chlorosis, necrosis, or growth retardation. In contrast, chilling tolerant species are able to grow at such cold temperatures. Conventional breeding methods have met with limited success in improving the cold tolerance of important crop plants involving inter-specific or inter-generic hybridization. Recent studies involving full genome profiling/ sequencing, mutational and transgenic plant analyses, have provided a deep insight of the complex transcriptional mechanism that operates under cold stress. The alterations in expression of genes in response to cold temperatures are followed by increases in the levels of hundreds of metabolites, some of which are known to have protective effects against the damaging effects of cold stress. Various low temperature inducible genes have been isolated from plants. Most appear to be involved in tolerance to cold stress and the expression of some of them is regulated by C-repeat binding factor/ dehydration-responsive element binding (CBF/DREB1) transcription factors. Numerous physiological and molecular changes occur during cold acclimation which reveals that the cold resistance is more complex than perceived and involves more than one pathway. The findings summarized in this review have shown potential practical applications for breeding cold tolerance in crop and horticultural plants suitable to temperate geographical locations.

Keywords: Cold stress, genetic engineering, transcription factors, crop plants.

INTRODUCTION

Abiotic stresses adversely affect growth, productivity and trigger a series of morphological, physiological, biochemical and molecular changes in plants. Cold stress is a major environmental factor that limits the agricultural productivity of plants in hilly areas. Plants respond and adapt to this stress to survive under stress conditions at the molecular and cellular levels as well as at the physiological and biochemical levels. However, expression of a variety of genes is induced by different stresses in diverse plants.

Low temperature often affects plant growth and crop productivity, which causes significant crop losses [1]. Plants differ in their tolerance to chilling (0-15 ºC) and freezing (< 0ºC) temperatures. In general, plants from temperate climatic regions are considered to be chilling tolerant with variable degree, and can increase their freezing tolerance by being exposed to chilling, non-freezing temperatures, a process known as cold acclimation [2], which is associated with biochemical and physiological changes [3-5] and ultimately showed marked changes in gene expression, biomembrane lipid composition, and small molecule accumulation [6]. Besides, plants of tropical and subtropical origins. are sensitive to chilling stress and lack the mechanism of cold acclimation. Low temperature resistance in plants is a very complex trait, involving many different metabolic pathways and cell compartments [7]. Conventional breeding methods have met with limited success in improving the cold tolerance of important crop plants involving inter-specific or inter-generic hybridization. Besides, in vitro induced variations have also been applied to improve the abiotic stress tolerance of various crop plants but without much success. The conventional breeding approaches are limited by the complexity of stress tolerance traits, low genetic variance of yield components under stress condition and lack of efficient selection criteria. It is important, therefore, to look for alternative strategies to develop cold stress tolerant crops.

Biotechnology offers new strategies that can be used to develop transgenic crop plants with improved tolerance to cold stress. Rapid advance in recombinant DNA technology and development of precise and efficient gene transfer protocols have resulted in efficient transformation and generation of transgenic lines in a number of crop species [8-10] (Fig. 1). A number of genes have been isolated and characterized that are responsive to freezing stress. Many studies have suggested that cold regulated gene expression is critical in plants for both chilling tolerance [11] and cold acclimation [12, 13]. Advent of molecular tools has made it possible to select directly at the gene label without waiting for the phenotype to show up. Transgenic approach is being pursued actively throughout the world to improve traits including tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses in a number of crops [14]. As compared to other stresses, plant responses to cold stress are complex, so the prospects of improving cold tolerance in crops seem not to be very bright. Despite this, efforts have been made during the last two decades to generate transgenic lines of different crops, which have shown improved tolerance to cold stress. Therefore, it is important to use most appropriate tools that help in reaching the goals. The genotype designed should be better than the available ones and must reach the farmers. An attempt has been made in this article to review the various mechanisms and genes involved in cold acclimatization and the possibilities where transgenic technology has been explored for breeding cold tolerance in crop plants.

Fig. (1).

Fig. (1)

Scheme for genetic engineering of crop plants against cold stress.

MORPHO-PHYSIOLOGICAL BASIS OF COLD TOLERANCE

A large number of studies have evaluated different plant species tolerant to different stresses such as drought, salinity and cold. However, less detail is given with regard to the methods used to evaluate the stress response; these studies may bring about some misleading conclusions from an agronomic or physiology perspective [15]. This is particularly important, in order to closely mimic the life span of most crops under cycles of stress, rather than short exposure to very severe stresses; although we agree that short exposures to stress are certainly adequate if the purpose is to assess gene expression only. In this section, we focus on the agronomic/physiological perspective and do not mean to challenge the quality of the work done to assess gene expression. Our intention is to try to reconcile both approaches (agronomic and molecular) toward a common focus: breeding cold tolerance. Though precise details about the protocols used to evaluate the performance of plants to any given stress are very essential to assess the performance of materials.

The temperate and cool regions are those where altitudes ranged from 1600-2500 m amsl (above mean sea level) and temperature during crop growth period ranged from 5-20 0C [16]. In temperate regions, low temperature is the primary abiotic stress which limits the crop productivity. The low temperature at seedling and reproductive stages is the major problem, results in slow establishment and low seed set which leads to poor yield of the crop [15]. The low temperature limits the crop productivity when temperatures remain above freezing that is > 0 oC, it is called as chilling stress. Chilling sensitive cultivars are typically tropical genotypes. There is wide range of cold stress in temperate areas differing in both timing and intensity of low temperature. Yield losses are more severe when cold stress occurs during reproductive stage/ anthesis in rice which lead to high spikelet sterility [17]. Ability of crop genotypes / lines to survive / perform better under low temperature than other genotypes is called as cold tolerance. Ordinarily, it is the consequence of cold hardening that is an earlier exposure to a low temperature for a specific period as a result of which chilling tolerance of the concerned plants increases. Cold tolerance involves increased chlorophyll accumulation, reduced sensitivity of photosynthesis, improved germination, pollen fertility and seed set which are desirable as:

INCREASED CHLOROPHYLL ACCUMULATION

Low temperature inhibits chlorophyll accumulations in actively growing leaves. In rice, cold tolerant lines, for example, japonica accumulates more chlorophyll under cold stress than do cold sensitive line, for example of indica rice [18]. Rasolofo [19] evaluated 181 accessions to identify donor and outstanding cold tolerant lines using leaf discolouration score (1-3) and found 19 remained green (dark) after 10 days in the 12 oC cold water tank. Sanghera et al. [17] found 18 cold tolerance IRCTN rice genotypes based on dark green colour and high spikelet fertility (>90%) under temperate conditions.

REDUCED SENSITIVITY OF PHOTOSYNTHESIS

Chloroplast and photosynthesis is major site of cold injury. Tolerance in these aspects is expressed in native vegetation adapted to growing under cool conditions. The reduced sensitivity of photosynthesis to cold has been observed in maize inbreds adapted to low temperature which is partly related to specific enzymes of the process [20].

IMPROVED GERMINATION

Genetic variation in cold tolerance at germination and seedling stage has been documented. Saini and Tandon [21] found that L62G, Heng Jodo, Jodo, Heugdo, IRAT 102, Khonorullo, K 78-28, Daegaldo, Mujudo and L62-2A genotypes were cold tolerant having more than 85% germination and good seedling vigour (score 3) at an average of 11 oC field temperature

Improved Pollen Fertility and Seed Set

Cold tolerance at reproductive stage is expressed as improved seed set and pollen fertility. It is largely a function of floral structure and function under stress. Lia et al. [22] reported plant cold tolerance in rice is associated with anther size, number of pollen grain, diameter of fertile pollen grains at booting stage. However, Sanghera et al. [17] reported that cold tolerance is associated with high spikelet fertility (>90%) and well panicle exsertion under temperate conditions.

Cold snaps cause a reaction in the plant that prevents sugar getting to the pollen. Without sugar there is no starch build-up which provides energy for pollen germination. And without pollen, pollination cannot occur, thereby, no grain is produced. CSIRO has found that all the ingredients for starch are present but they are not getting into the pollen grain where they are needed. A cell layer surrounding the pollen, called the ‘tapetum’, is responsible for feeding the pollen with sugar. The tapetum is only active for 1-2 days – so if a cold snap occurs at this time, then there is no further chance for pollen growth. But the sugar cannot freely move into the tapetum and pass through it to the pollen. Instead the sugar has to be broken down then transported in bits to the pollen. ‘Invertase’ is the catalyst that helps in breakdown of the sugar molecule to transport it into the tapetum before it is transported to the pollen [23]. Quantities of invertase are decreased in conventional rice when it is exposed to cold temperatures, but they remain at normal levels in a cold tolerant variety when it experiences cold. By comparing a cold tolerant strain of rice with conventional rice, CSIRO has found that the gene responsible for invertase looks exactly the same in the cold tolerant variety as it does in conventional rice. So the invertase gene itself does not make the rice plant cold tolerant – but instead a mechanism that regulates the invertase gene is different. Early research indicates that the invertase gene is regulated by the hormone abscisic acid (ABA). Oliver et al. [24] has experimented with injecting plants with ABA – the resulting rice plants are sterile, just like that if they experienced a cold snap. Also, ABA levels increase when conventional rice is exposed to cold, but they remain the same in the cold tolerant variety. Recent studies have indicated that the difference between cold-sensitive and tolerant rice is due to a different ability to control ABA levels [25]. It has also been shown that this mechanism may require interactions with other plant hormones like auxins [26]. Further, Zhao et al. [25] also reported that low temperature turns off the genes responsible for sugar transport into the pollen grains and therefore starch cannot be produced in the pollen in cold conditions. Cold did not cause repression of sugar delivery in cold tolerant Chinese rice and fertile pollen was still produced following cold treatment. The sugar metabolism genes also continued to function normally during cold treatment of cold tolerant rice. Ample genetic variation for cold tolerance is available in well adapted breeding population. Germplasm collected from high altitude and low temperature areas, cold tolerant mutant, somaclonal variants and wild species can be exploited for breeding improved cold tolerant genotypes in hilly areas [15].

MECHANISMS FOR UNDERSTANDING TOLERANCE TO COLD INJURY

Low temperature has a huge impact on the survival and geographical distribution of plants. It affects a range of cellular metabolisms in plant system depending on the intensity and duration of the stress. When exposed to low temperatures, plants respond with changes in their pattern of gene expression and protein products. Different studies have indicated that the membrane systems of the cell are the primary site of freezing injury in plants [2, 27]. In addition, it is well established that freeze-induced membrane damage results primarily from the severe dehydration associated with freezing [27, 28]. Many species of tropical or subtropical origin are injured or killed by nonfreezing low temperatures, and exhibit various symptoms of chilling injury such as chlorosis, necrosis, or growth retardation. In contrast, chilling-tolerant species are able to grow at such cold temperatures.

However, multiple forms of membrane damage can occur as a consequence of freeze induced cellular dehydration including expansion-induced-lysis, lamellar-to-hexagonal-II phase transitions, and fracture jump lesions [28]. Thus, a key function of cold acclimation should be to stabilize membranes against freezing injury. Indeed, cold acclimation prevents expansion-induced-lyses and the formation of hexagonal II phase lipids in rye and other plants [28]. This ability to adapt has an impact on the distribution and survival of the plant, and on crop yields. Multiple mechanisms appear to be involved in this stabilization. The best documented are changes in lipid composition [28]. Secondly, temperature induced change in membrane fluidity is another consequences in plants during temperature stresses and might represent a potential site of perception and/or injury [29, 30]. Adaptation of living cells to chilling temperatures is a function of alteration in the membrane lipid composition by increased fatty acid unsaturation. Genetically engineered tobacco plants over-expressing chloroplast glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase (GPAT) gene (involved in phosphatidyl glycerol fatty acid desaturation) from squash (Cucurbita maxima) and A. thaliana showed an increase in the number of unsaturated fatty acids and a corresponding decrease in the chilling sensitivity. At low temperature, greater membrane lipid unsaturation appears to be crucial for optimum membrane function. An Arabidopsis fatty acid biosynthesis (FAB1) mutant with more saturated membranes showed decreased quantum efficiency of photosystem II (PSII), chlorophyll content and the amount of chloroplast glycerolipids after prolonged exposure to low temperature [31]. A triple mutant fatty acid desaturation (fad3-2 fad7-2 fad8) devoid of trienoic fatty acids (18:3 or 16:3) produced a phenotype similar to FAB1, when plants were subjected to prolonged low temperature exposure [32]. Similarly, fad5 and fad6 mutants with more saturated membranes became chlorotic and showed growth retardation during low temperature incubation [33]. In addition to membrane unsaturation, it appears that lipid asymmetry in the membrane also contributes to membrane physical structure at low temperature [34]. The accumulation of sucrose and other simple sugars that typically occurs with cold acclimation also seems likely to contribute to the stabilization of membranes as these molecules can protect membranes against freeze-induced damage in vitro [35, 36].

Besides, protective chaperone like function of LEA proteins acting against cellular damage has been proposed, indicating the role of LEA proteins in anti aggregation of enzymes under desiccation and freezing stresses. There is emerging evidence that certain novel hydrophilic and late embryogenesis abundant (LEA) polypeptides also participate in the stabilization of membranes against freeze-induced injury. These hydrophilic and late embryogenesis abundant polypeptides are predicted to contain regions capable of forming amphipathic α-helices which are shown to have strong effect on intrinsic curvature of monolayers and their propensity to form hexagonal II phase. They are said to defer their formation at lower temperatures [37]. There is another evidence that freeze-induced production of reactive oxygen species contributes to membrane damage and that intercellular ice can form adhesions with cell walls and membranes and cause cell rupture [38]. Further, there is evidence that protein denaturation occurs in plants at low temperature [39] which could potentially result in cellular damage. In these cases, the enhancement of antioxidative mechanisms [40], increased levels of sugars in the apoplastic space [41], and the induction of genes encoding molecular chaperones [39], respectively, could have protective effects.

In cold stress-tolerant plants, many genes involved in the synthesis of osmoprotectants—organic compounds such as amino acids (e.g. proline), quaternary and other amines (e.g. glycinebetaine and polyamines) and a variety of sugars and sugar alcohols (e.g. mannitol, trehalose and galactinol) that accumulate during osmotic adjustment—have been used. Both cold-stress-induced transcripts and constitutively expressed transcripts need to be processed, exported to the cytoplasm and kept in conformations that are competent for translation. RNA can fold into extensive secondary structures that could interfere with its function, and cold temperatures exacerbate this interference. Many genes that respond to multiple stresses like dehydration and low temperature at the transcriptional level are also induced which protects the cell from dehydration and chilling. In order to restore the cellular function and make plants more tolerant to stress, transferring a single gene encoding a single specific stress protein may not be sufficient to reach the required tolerance levels. To overcome such constraints, enhancing tolerance towards multiple stresses by a gene encoding a stress inducible transcription factor that regulates a number of other genes is a promising approach. In bacteria, nucleic-acid-binding cold shock proteins (CSPs) accumulate at cold temperatures and function as transcription antiterminators or translational enhancers by destabilizing RNA secondary structure [42]. Some CSP-domain-containing proteins in plants are upregulated by cold stress, and might function as RNA chaperones in the regulation of translation [43, 44]. A different cold-responsive nucleic-acid-binding protein, a zincfinger- containing glycine-rich RNA-binding protein from Arabidopsis designated atRZ-1a, is also upregulated by cold stress, and genetic analysis supports its function in freezing tolerance [45]. Compared to other organisms, plants have the largest number of DEAD-box RNA helicase genes [46]. One of these helicases, which is encoded by the Arabidopsis low expression of osmotically responsive genes4 (LOS4) gene, is essential for plant tolerance of chilling and freezing stress [47]. LOS4 is required for efficient export of RNA from the nucleus to the cytoplasm [48]. The Arabidopsis nucleoporin AtNUP160 suppressor of auxin resistance1 (SAR1) also controls RNA export, and is crucial for chilling and freezing tolerance [49]. Both LOS4 and AtNUP160 proteins are enriched at the nuclear rim [47, 49]. Defects in the nucleocytoplasmic transport of RNA seem to affect cold tolerance preferentially, because the LOS4 and AtNUP160 mutant plants do not have severe growth or developmental phenotypes, nor are they strongly altered in the tolerance of other abiotic stresses.

KEY PLAYERS INVOLVED IN COLD RESPONSIVE PATHWAYS

Cold tolerance is the result of complex physiological mechanisms involving many cell and plant traits. Earlier studies have shown that the genetic control of cold tolerance is complex and can be regarded as polygenic [50] and the mechanism of how these genes controlled cold tolerance is still not fully clear. Therefore, the foundation for a better molecular and genetic understanding of the cold responsive pathways will improve our knowledge and pave the way for the development of improved methodologies for cold tolerance screening. Key to the tolerance of plants to abiotic stresses is a complex network of transcription factors and other regulatory genes that control multiple defense enzymes, proteins and pathways [51]. The discovery of gene expression change during cold acclimation was the starting of exploration of antifreezing molecular mechanisms. In this context, Zhao et al. [25] reported that gene expression profiling using DNA chips indicated that large numbers of genes were differentially expressed under cold stress. They identified 242 unique genes that are expressed differentially between cold sensitive and cold tolerant rice. These genes are involved in processes such as senescence, cell death, male sterility and plant hormone response. Similarly, global transcript profiling analyses indicated that > 10% of genes in the Arabidopsis genome were regulated during cold acclimation [52-55]. Transcriptome analysis using microarray technology is a powerful technique, which has proven very useful for discovering many stress-inducible genes involved in stress response and tolerance [25, 55-57]. Genes involved in stress signal sensing and a cascade of stress-signaling in A. thaliana has been of recent research interest. Components of the same signal transduction pathway may also be shared by various stress factors such as drought, salt and cold. Although there are multiple pathways of signal-transduction systems operating at the cellular level for gene regulation.

In past, it has been reported that genes induced during stress conditions function not only in protecting cells from stress by producing important metabolic proteins, but also in regulating genes for signal transduction in the stress response [52]. Several stress induced cor genes such as rd29A, cor15A, kin1 and cor6.6 are triggered in response to cold treatment, ABA and water deficit stress in the early stages of the osmotic stress response.

Several stress induced cor genes such as rd29A, cor15A, kin1 and cor6.6 are triggered in response to cold treatment, ABA and water deficit stress in the early stages of the osmotic stress response. Similarly, a cis-acting element, dehydration responsive element (DRE) identified in A. thaliana, is also involved in ABA-independent gene expression under drought, low temperature and high salt stress conditions in many dehydration responsive genes like rd29A that are responsible for dehydration and cold-induced gene expression. Thus, clearly, the overexpression of some drought-responsive transcription factors can lead to the expression of downstream genes and the enhancement of abiotic stress tolerance in plants. Thus, these gene products are classified into two groups [53, 54]. The first group of proteins that probably function in stress tolerance includes chaperones, LEA proteins, osmotin, antifreeze proteins, mRNA-binding proteins, some key enzymes for osmolyte biosynthesis (like proline, water channel proteins, sugar and proline transporters, detoxification enzymes), enzymes for fatty acid metabolism (proteinase inhibitors, ferritin) and lipid-transfer proteins [58]. It has been reported that some of these stress-inducible genes specially encoding proteins (such as enzymes for osmolyte biosynthesis, LEA proteins and detoxification enzymes) have been overexpressed in transgenic plants and produce stress-tolerant phenotypes in the transgenic plants [51, 56]. These results indicate that the gene products of the stress-inducible genes really function in stress tolerance. The second group contains protein factors involved in regulation of signal transduction and gene expression that probably function during stress response [59]. This group includes various transcription factors that regulate different stress-inducible genes collectively or separately, and may constitute gene networks. Seki et al. [59] reported that some of these regulatory pathways are also involved in drought-, cold-, or high-salinity stress responses. Though, the clear cut functions of most of these genes are not fully understood. Functional analysis of these stress-inducible transcription factors will provide precise information on the complex regulatory gene networks that are involved in responses to drought, cold, and high-salinity stresses [60, 25]. Some of these stress-inducible regulatory genes that encode proteins (transcription factors) have been overexpressed in transgenic plants and generate stress-tolerant phenotypes in them [61, 62].

COLD TOLERANCE USING TRANSGENIC APPROACHES

When a plant is subjected to abiotic stress, a number of genes are turned on, resulting in increased levels of several metabolites and proteins, some of which may be responsible for conferring a certain degree of protection to these stresses. A key to progress towards breeding better crops under stress has been to understand the changes in cellular, biochemical and molecular machinery that occur in response to stress. A key to progress towards breeding better crops under stress has been to understand the changes in cellular, biochemical and molecular machinery that occur in response to stress which in turn provides new tools and strategies to improve the environmental stress tolerance of crops. Since freezing tolerance is a multigenic trait [63], transformation of a single functional gene appears to have a limited effect on crop freezing tolerance [64]. Because many aspects of cold adaptation process are under transcriptional control, many transcription regulatory factors were chosen, hence, genetic engineering for introgression of such genes that are known to be involved in stress response and putative tolerance, might prove to be a faster track towards improving crop varieties for enhanced cold tolerance.

Low-temperature limitations have been overcome by the identification of cold-tolerant genes for applications in genetically transformed crops. In transgenic tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum), chilling tolerance at 1 ºC for 7 d was achieved by the over expression of a gene encoding chloroplast w3 fatty acid desaturase [65]. Furthermore, tolerance at 1 ºC for 11 d was conferred using a gene encoding a non-specific cyanobacterial desaturase, and the resultant transgenic tobacco plants showed a reduction in saturated fatty acid content in membrane lipids [66]. The over expression of glycerol-3-phosphate acyl transferase altered the unsaturation of fatty acids and conferred chilling tolerance in transgenic plants [67-69]. Hence, modifications in lipid composition that stabilize cell membranes and prevent cellular leakage lead to cold tolerance.

Transgenic technology has opened up many exciting possibilities to improve cold stress in plants by introduction or removal of gene or genes that regulate a specific trait [70]. It also offers uncommon opportunities for improvement in genetic potential of plants in the form of development of specific crop varieties that are more resistant to biotic and cold stresses with enhanced nutritional level.

During last two decades, advancement in plant biotechnology has led to the identification and isolation of a number of transcription factor(s) related to cold stress tolerance. A good number of genes which have been identified in different studies (Table 1) raise the question of exactly which genes are most central to increasing cold/ freezing tolerance. The genes selected for transformation should be involved in encoding enzymes that are required for the biosynthesis of various osmoprotectants. Other classes of genes that selected for transformation include those that encoded enzymes for modifying membrane lipids, LEA protein, and detoxification enzymes. In these studies, either a single gene for a protective protein or an enzyme was overexpressed under the control of the constitutive 35S cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) promoter in transgenic plants, although several genes have been shown to function in environmental stress tolerance and response [56]. The genes encoding protein factors that regulate gene expression and signal transduction, that function in stress responses may be useful for improving the cold tolerance of plants by gene transfer as they can regulate many stress-inducible genes involved in cold stress tolerance.

Table 1.

Selective Reports on Production of Cold Stress-Tolerant Transgenic Crops

Gene (s) / Gene product Cellular role Transgenic Host-Plant Performance of transgenic plants Reference
gpat Glycerol 3-phosphate acyltransferase Fatty acidunsaturation N. tabacum Transformants showed less chilling damage to photosynthetic activity than the wild type [86]
sod Superoxide dismutase Dismutation of toxic reactive oxygen intermediate N. tabacum Transformants showed 20% higher photosynthetic activity during chilling compared to untransformed plants [116]
sacB Levan sucrase Fructan biosynthesis N.tabacum Transformants were more tolerant to freezing and PEG-mediated water stress than the wild type [117]
cor15a Cold regulated gene Promotes freezing tolerance A. thaliana Transformants showed in vivo enhanced freezing tolerance of protoplasts and the chloroplasts [64]
mn-sod Mn-Superoxide dismutase Dismutation of reactiveoxygen inter mediates in mitochondria M. sativa Transformants showed reduced injury from water deficit stress and increased winter survival [118]
gst/gpx Glutathione-Stransferase and glutathione peroxidase Detoxification of herbicides and toxic substances N.tabacum Transformants over-expressing GST/GPX showed stimulated seedling growth under chilling and salt stress [119]
cbf1 CRT/DRE binding factor Transcription factor A. thaliana Transformants showed regulation of several cor genes at the same time and showed freezing tolerance [76]
dreb1 anddreb2 DRE-binding Protein Transcription factor A. thaliana Transformants revealed freezing and dehydration tolerance but caused dwarfed phenotypes in transgenic plants [81]
WCS120/COR39 CCGAC sequences like CRT/DREs in its promoter Low temperature regulated gene Trtricum sativum cold inducible in monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous plants [120]
codA Choline oxidase A Glycinebetaine biosynthesis O. sativa Transformants accumulated high levels of glycinebetaine and showed increased tolerance to salt and low temperature stress [121]
codA Choline oxidase A Glycinebetaine biosynthesis A. thaliana Transformants were tolerant to salt and cold [122]
DREB1A (CBF3) DRE-binding protein Transcription factor Arabidopsis Increased salt, drought and cold tolerance in nonacclimated plants [75]
prodh Proline dehydrogenase Proline biosynthesis A. thaliana The antisense transgenics were more tolerant to freezing and high salinity than wild types [123]
CBF3 DRE-binding protein Transcription factor Arabidopsis Increased freezing tolerance of cold- acclimated plants [5]
ala1 Aminophospholipid ATPase 1 P-type ATPase (Transporter protein) A. thaliana Transformants showing down regulation results in cold-affected plants that are much smaller than the wild type [34]
SCOF1cold-inducible zinc finger protein Regulator of SGBF-1 as a transcription factor Glycine max activate COR gene expression and increase freezing tolerance in non-acclimated transgenic plants [102]
abi3 Abscisic acid induced protein Transcription factor A. thaliana Marked increase in expression of low temperature-induced freezing tolerance accompanied by up-regulation of RAB18, LTI129, LTI130 and LTI178 [13]
CuCOR19citrus dehydrin Inhibition of lipid peroxidation N. tabacum Increased the cold tolerance [89]
CBF1/ DREB1bDRE-binding protein Transcription factor O. sativa The cold-responsive genes lip5, lip9, and OsDhn1 were up-regulated in the transgenic plants [124]
DREB1A (rd29A) DRE-binding protein Stress-inducible promoter N. tabacum Improved drought and low-temperature stress tolerance [83]
OSISAP1 Zinc-finger protein Transcription factor N. tabacum The transcript level of OSISAP1 was increased to a very high level during a 12-h cold treatment [125]
Osmyb4 Transcription factor Arabidopsis Increases chilling and freezing tolerance [126]
HOS10 Encodes an R2R3-type protein Transcription factor O. sativa Enhanced cold tolerance [127]
ZAT12 C2H2 zinc finger Transcription factor Arabidopsis Improved cold acclimation [55]
Cor15amChloroplast stromal protein Stress-inducible promoter Arabidopsis Enhanced cryoprotective activity [128]
OsMYB3R-2 DNA-binding domain Transcription factor Arabidopsis Overexpression of OsMYB3R-2 leads to increased tolerance to freezing, drought, and salt stress [93]
ACBP6Acyl-CoA-binding protein Decline in phosphatidylcholine and elevation of phosphatidic acid Arabidopsis Overexpression of ACBP6 enhanches freezing tolerance [129]
OsMYB3R-2 DNA-binding domain Transcription factor O. sativa Overexpression of OsMYB3R-2 exhibited enhanced cold tolerance [130]
AtCSP3 Cold shock protein RNA chaperon Arabidopsis Transgenic plants conferred enhanced freezing tolerance as compared to wild type plants hence demonstrating essential role of RNA chaperones for cold adaptation in higher plants [131]
MYBS3 DNA-binding repeat MYB Transcription factor O. sativa Plays a critical role in cold adaptation in rice [99]
mybc1Regulate osmotic stress tolerance Transcription factor Arabidopsis Exhibited an increased tolerance to freezing stress [132]
ThpI Thermal hysteresis proteins (Anti freeze protein) Transcription factor Arabidopsis Enhanced low temperature tolerance in transgenic plants was observed by changes of electrolyte leakage activity, malonyldialdehyde and proline contents [133]
CBF1 CRT/DRE binding factor 1 Transcription factor Solanum Lycopersicum Detection of higher activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD), higher non-photochemical quenching (NPQ), and lower malondialdehyde (MDA) content in transgenic tomato leaves suggest that CBF1 protein plays an important role in protection of PSII and PSI during low temperature stress at low irradiance [108]

The CBF genes represent one of the most significant discoveries in the field of low temperature adaptation and signal transduction. All important crops and few vegetables species have contained this gene [11]. Various low temperature-inducible genes have been isolated from plants that appear to be involved in tolerance to cold stress [71, 72], and the expression of some of them is regulated by C-repeat binding factor/dehydration-responsive element binding (CBF/ DREB1) transcription factors. Three CBF/DREB1 genes (CBF3/DREB1a, CBF1/DREB1b, and CBF2/DREB1c) belonging to the AP2/DREBP family of DNA-binding proteins have been identified in Arabidopsis [73, 74, 75]. Transgenic Arabidopsis plants constitutively over-expressing a cold inducible transcription factor (CBF1; CRT/DRE binding protein) showed tolerance to freezing without any negative effect on the development and growth characteristics [76]. Overexpression of Arabidopsis CBF1 (CRT/DRE binding protein) has been shown to activate cor homologous genes at non-acclimating temperatures [77]. The CBF1 cDNA when introduced into tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) under the control of a CaMV35S promoter improved tolerance to chilling, drought and salt stress but exhibited dwarf phenotype and reduction in fruit set and seed number per fruit [11].

The expression of related cold shock proteins (CSPs) from bacteria, CspA from Escherichia coli and CspB from Bacillus subtilis, promotes stress adaptation in multiple plant species [78]. Transgenic rice plants expressing CspA and CspB manifest improved stress tolerance for a number of abiotic stresses, including cold, heat, and water deficits. It has long been established that changes in gene expression occur upon exposure to cold acclimation. Number of COR genes isolated from Arabidopsis that encode polypeptides thought to have protective roles against dehydration. Expression profile experiments in Arabidopsis demonstrated that extensive changes in gene expression occur during cold acclimation and that a substantial number of the genes that are up-regulated by the cold response are involved in metabolism. Hajela et al. [79] reported that a set of genes that encode a related family of cold-regulated (COR) proteins, which are massively induced during cold acclimation [80]. These COR genes were used by different researchers to identify a family of Arabidopsis transcription factors known as either C-repeat binding factors (CBF) (CBF1, CBF2 and CBF3) or dehydration responsive element-binding factors (DREB) (DREB1B, DREB1C and DREB1A). In Arabidopsis (A. thaliana) and rice, the CBF/DREB1-dependent cold response pathway has been shown to play a predominant role in freezing tolerance through the process of cold acclimation. These CBFs/DREBs are upstream transcription factors that bind to promotor cis element CRT/DRE and activate the expression of these cold responsive genes [71]. Overexpression of CBF1/DREB1b and CBF3/DREB1a enhances cold tolerance by inducing COR (cold regulated) genes [81, 76, 75, 5]. Furthermore, its overexpression causes many biochemical changes, such as the accumulation of sugar and proline [5]. Thus, the CBF/DREB1 genes are thought to be activators that integrate several components of the cold acclimation response by which plants increase their tolerance to low temperatures after exposure to nonfreezing conditions [5]. Several stress induced COR genes such as rd29A, COR15A, kin1 and COR6.6 are triggered in response to cold treatment, ABA and water deficit stress [4].

There have been numerous efforts in enhancing tolerance towards multiple stresses such as cold, drought and salt stress in crops other than the model plants like Arabidopsis, tobacco and alfalfa. An increased tolerance to freezing and drought in Arabidopsis was achieved by overexpressing CBF4, a close CBF/ DREB1 homolog whose expression is rapidly induced during drought stress and by ABA treatment, but not by cold [82]. Subsequently, the overexpression of DREB1A has been shown to improve the drought- and low-temperature stress tolerance in tobacco, wheat and groundnut [83, 84]. The use of stress inducible rd29A promoter minimized the negative effects on plant growth in these crop species. Further, Gilmour et al. [80] have shown that ectopic transgenic overexpression of CBF1/DREB1B, CBF2/ DREB1C or CBF3/DREB1A in Arabidopsis activates a suite of CBF/DREB target genes at warm temperatures and results in increased freezing and drought tolerance. CBF transcripts begin accumulating within 15 minutes of plants being exposed to low temperature strongly suggests that the low temperature “Thermometer” and “Signal Transducer” are present at warm non-inducing temperatures. Two cDNA clones that encode DRE-binding proteins, DREB1A/CBF3 and DREB2A, have been isolated by using yeast one-hybrid screening. cDNA clones encoding two DREB1A homologs (named DREB1B/CBF1 and DREB1C/CBF2) and one DREB2A homolog (DREB2B) were also isolated and Expression of the DREB1A gene and its two homologs was induced by low-temperature stress, whereas expression of the DREB2A gene and its homolog was induced by dehydration. These results indicate that two independent families of DREB proteins, DREB1 and DREB2, function as transacting factors in two separate signal transduction pathways under low-temperature and dehydration conditions, respectively.

However, Agarwal et al. [85] showed that CBFs are negatively regulated by an upstream transcription factor, MYB15 (an R2R3-MYB family protein) in Arabidopsis. MYB15 is expressed even in the absence of cold stress, and MYB15 can bind to MYB recognition elements (MYBRS) in the promoters of CBFs. MYB15 mutant plants show enhanced expression of CBFs during cold acclimation and enhanced freezing tolerance, whereas, transgenic Arabidopsis overexpressing MYB15 showed a decreased expression of CBFs and a reduction in freezing tolerance. Thus, MYB15 is an upstream transcription factor that negatively regulates the expression of CBFs.

Transcriptome analysis of ZAT12-overexpressing Arabidopsis revealed that the ZAT12 regulon consists of at least 24 cold standard set (COS) genes, of which nine are cold-induced and 15 are cold-repressed genes [55]. Constitutive overexpression of Arabidopsis DREB1A improved drought and low-temperature stress tolerance in tobacco, and regulation of transgene expression via the stress-inducible RD29A promoter minimized the negative effects on plant growth [83]. Similarly, the Arabidopsis DREB1A gene was placed under control of the RD29A promoter and transferred via biolistic transformation into bread wheat [84]. However, constitutive overexpression of the CBF genes using the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter can result in undesirable agronomic traits. In Arabidopsis, CBF overexpression can cause a ‘‘stunted’’ growth phenotype, a decrease in seed yield and a delay in flowering [81, 5].

In the last decade, extensive research efforts have been undertaken to identify and characterize cold-responsive (COR) genes and a number of homologous components of the Arabidopsis CBF cold response pathway in many plants have been found [6]. Many of these putative orthologs have been structured, analyzed and functionally tested. The expression patterns of the CBFs and CORs in response to low temperature are similar in a variety of plants species, involving rapid cold-induced expression of the CBFs followed by expression of CBF-targeted genes that increase freezing tolerance. Moreover, constitutive overexpression of the Arabidopsis CBF genes in other plants resulted in increased freezing tolerance that have been successfully used to engineer cold stress tolerance in several crop species [6].

Transgenic attempts with other structural genes have also been made with fair degree of success. Genetically engineered tobacco plants over-expressing chloroplast glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase (GPAT) gene (involved in phosphatidyl glycerol fatty acid desaturation) from squash (Cucurbita maxima) and A. thaliana [86] showed an increase in the number of unsaturated fatty acids present in the plant cell wall, which enhance the cold tolerance to the plants during cold stress. Expression of a plant phosphatase (At PP2CA) in transgenic A. thaliana can accelerate the development of cold acclimation and increase freezing tolerance. It has also shown that transgenic plants expressing a constitutively active kinase NPK1, is more tolerant to chilling and other abiotic stresses [87]. Pennycooke et al. [88] reported that down-regulating α-Gal (α -Galactosidase) in transgenic petunia resulted in an increase in freezing tolerance suggesting that engineering raffinose metabolism by transformation with α -Gal provides an additional method for improving the freezing tolerance of plants. The overexpression of genes encoding LEA proteins can improve the stress tolerance of transgenic plants. Expression of the citrus gene encoding a LEA protein, CuCOR19 increased the cold tolerance of transgenic tobacco [89]. Likewise, the freezing tolerance of Arabidopsis was increased by the ectopic expression of the wheat gene WCS19 [47], the Arabidopsis gene COR15A [64], and the co-expression of the genes RAB18 and COR47 and XERO2 and ERD10 [90]. The freezing tolerance of strawberry leaves was enhanced by expression of the wheat dehydrin gene WCOR410 [72]. On the other hand, the expression of two cold-induced LEA proteins from spinach (Kaye et al., 1998) [91] and three desiccation-induced LEA proteins from C. plantagineum [92] in tobacco did not induce any significant changes in the freezing or drought tolerance of the respective transgenic plants. This may indicate either that not all LEA proteins make a significant contribution to plant stress tolerance, or that they need a particular background to function in, as suggested for transgenic strawberry plants [72]. Kim et al. [44] engineered tobacco with ring zinc finger protein (RDCPt) from hot pepper (Capsicum annuum) and reported that expression of this gene resulted in improved cold tolerance in transgenic plants as compared to wild type. Dai et al. [93] reported that overexpression of OsMYB3R-2 in transgenic Arabidopsis increased tolerance to freezing when exposed to -8 ºC for 10 h. They found that survival after 6 d at normal conditions was 26.8% for the wild-type and 84.5% for transgenic lines. Phenotypically, most transgenic seedlings were green and could regrow as compared with the wild type; whereas most wild-type seedlings became white and did not regrow after removed to normal conditions. The survival percentage under different low temperatures also showed dramatic difference between the transgenic plants and wild-type plants.

Pramanik and Imai [94] reported that TPP (trehalose-6-phosphate phosphatase) genes expressed in rice and their expression is induced by cold. Trehalose accumulates rapidly and transiently, which follows the transient induction of TPP activity, in rice tissues during chilling stress [94]. Overexpression of TPS (trehalose-6-phosphate synthase) and TPP genes enhanced the accumulation of trehalose and tolerance to cold stress in transgenic tobacco and rice [95-98]. However, the regulatory mechanism of TPPs by cold or other stresses is unclear. In another study, Su et al. [99] observed that MYBS3 plays a critical role in cold adaptation in rice and necessary for enhancing cold tolerance. They reported that transgenic rice constitutively overexpressing MYBS3 tolerated 4 ºC for at least 1 week and exhibited no yield penalty in normal field conditions.

Based on previous studies it has been established that the CBF cold responsive pathway is an integral component of the cold acclimation response [100, 63, 6]. However, the transcriptome data showed that additional cold-regulatory pathways also exist [52, 53, 101]. Transcriptome comparisons indicated that only 12% of the cold-responsive genes are certain members of the CBF regulon. Moreover, at least 28% of the cold-responsive genes were not regulated by the CBF transcription factors, including 15 encoding known or putative transcription factors, indicating that these cold-responsive genes are members of different low-temperature regulons [55].

When overexpressed in Arabidopsis and tobacco, the soybean gene SCOF-1 (encodes a zinc-finger protein) can activate COR gene expression and increase freezing tolerance in non-acclimated transgenic plants, although the SCOF-1 protein does not directly bind to either the DRE/CRT or the ABRE elements [102]. SCOF-1 interacts with another G-box binding bZIP protein, SGBF-1. SGBF-1 can activate ABRE-driven reporter gene expression in Arabidopsis leaf protoplasts. Thus, SCOF-1 may regulate the activity of SGBF-1 as a transcription factor in inducing COR gene expression [102].

Forward genetic analysis in Arabidopsis identified two transcription factors, high expression of osmotically responsive genes, HOS9 and HOS10, which are required for basal freezing tolerance [103, 104]. Similarly, microarray analysis led to the identification of the cold-stress-inducible AP2 family transcription factor gene related to ABI3/VP1 (RAV1) [52, 55] that might regulate plant growth under cold stress. RAV1 is down regulated by epibrassinolide and transgenic Arabidopsis overexpressing RAV1 exhibits a retardation of lateral root and rosette-leaf development. Further, the importance of CBF-independent pathways is also supported by analysis of mutants that have increased freezing tolerance, for example, mutations in eskimo1 (ESK1), a protein of unknown function, result in constitutive freezing tolerance. The Eskimo1 mutation was first identified as a mutation conferring frost survival without an acclimation period [105]. Later on, Bouchabke-Coussa et al. [106] clearly showed that ESKIMO1 mutants are more tolerant to freezing but only after acclimation. The genes that are affected by the ESK1 mutation are distinct from those of the CBF regulon [107]. Recently, a CBF 1 gene has been introduced into tomato that resulted in transgenic plants showing higher activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD), higher non-photochemical quenching (NPQ), and lower malondialdehyde (MDA) content . Thus suggesting that CBF1 protein plays an important role in protection of PSII and PSI during low temperature stress at low irradiance [108].

Aforementioned studies clearly demonstrate the complex and interactive relationships among different pathways regulated by cold acclimation. Hence, elucidation of the mechanism regulating cold-regulated genes is an important goal in achieving a full understanding of cold acclimation. With the advent of molecular genetics and biotechnology, it is now possible to genetically engineer plants to be more tolerant to low temperature. The technologies can be so developed/ modified that will significantly improve breeding efficiency, resulting in rapid and accurate incorporation of cold tolerant genes into crop plants.

PROSPECTS OF COLD TOLERANT GENES IN HILL AGRICULTURE

Cold is an environmental factor that limits the geographical distribution and growing season of many plant species, and it often adversely affects crop quality and productivity [71]. Most temperate plants can acquire tolerance to freezing temperature by a prior exposure to low non-freezing temperature, a process known as cold acclimatization [39,109, 110]. Plants of tropical and subtropical origins are sensitive to chilling temperature (0oC-10oC) and are incapable of cold acclimation. Genes induced by stress can be roughly classified into two groups: genes coding for regulatory proteins, mainly transcription factors, and genes encoding proteins involved directly in response mechanisms; genes from both classes are of interest. Variations in the expression of regulators could lead to a protective status before the emergence of stress and have multiple effects. Genes involved in protection or repair mechanisms could be new targets for the improvement of plant plasticity and adaptive responses to stress [111]. The unraveling of general stress responses in the model species Arabidopsis thaliana helped to identify potential targets for plant breeding. Arabidopsis genes involved in tolerance to abiotic stress were transferred, by genetic engineering, to many crops and tolerance was successfully conferred in the field, despite the complexity of plant responses to environmental stress [11, 61]. Thus, finding new key genes responsible for abiotic stress tolerance phenotypes is of great importance not only for a better understanding of stress responses, but also for promising future crop improvement.

Many studies have suggested that cold regulated gene expression is critical in plants for both chilling tolerance [47, 11] and cold acclimation [12, 71, 13, 112]. Cold responsive genes encode a diverse array of proteins such as enzymes involved in respiration and metabolism of carbohydrates, lipids, phenylpropanoids and antioxidants: molecular chaperones, antifreeze proteins, and others with a presumed function in tolerance to dehydration caused by freezing [113, 39, 71]). The change in the gene expression occur in plant during cold acclimatization a developmental process that results in increased tolerance [28]. Since then, it has repeatedly been speculated that certain COR (cold regulated) genes might have role in freezing tolerance. To test this notion investigators have turned to isolating the characterizing genes that are expressed in response to low temperature. These efforts have led to the identification of a number of genes such as the COR 15a KINI, LTI 78, fad 7etc. of A. thaliana. The generic trends of the genes and transcription factors are available in STIFDB (Stress responsive Transcription Factor Database). STIFDB (available at http://caps.ncbs.res.in/stifdb.) is a database of stress-related genes, which are upregulated in abiotic stress-related microarray experiments. STIFDB provides a platform to understand the stress-regulome of abiotic stress responsive genes in plants. STIFDB will be a highly useful resource for a researcher working on abiotic stress responses in plants [114].

Low temperature stress is a major environmental factor that not only limits where crops can be grown but also reduces yields depending on the weather in a particular growing season. In addition to exceptionally stressful years that cause significant yield reductions, less extreme stress almost certainly causes smaller losses over large areas to produce comparable yield reductions every year. Even in cases when freezing stress does not result in yield loses; it often results in crop quality reduction. Each year, worldwide losses in crop production due to low temperature damage amount to approximately $ 2 Billion. Some of the major losses include the 1995 early fall frosts in the US which caused losses of over $1 billion to corn and soybeans. The occasional freezes in Florida have shifted the citrus belt further south, and California sustained $650M of damage in 1998 to the citrus crop due to a winter freeze. The inherent cold hardiness of the crop determines in which agricultural areas it can be grown. Crops that are more resistant to freezing stress would allow some geographical regions to grow more profitable and productive crops with less environmental risks. However despite continued efforts, traditional breeding has had only limited success in imparting crop plants with better freezing tolerance due to very little was known about the mechanisms that regulate chilling and freezing tolerance. With the advent of molecular genetics and biotechnology, it is now possible to genetically engineer plants to be more tolerant to many environmental adversities, including low temperature. Molecular studies have shown that several genes with various functions are induced by environmental stresses such as drought, high-salinity and low temperature in plants. Most of the dehydration responsive genes are induced by the plant hormone abscisic acid (ABA), but others are not. Expression analyses of dehydration-responsive genes have provided at least four independent regulatory systems (regulons) for gene expression in a model plant Arabidopsis thaliana. The cis-acting elements in the promoters of some genes that have a typical stress-inducible expression profile and the transcription factors that affect the expression of these genes have been analyzed [115].

FUTURE OUTLOOK AND CONCLUSION

The development of genetically engineered plants by the introduction and/or overexpression of selected genes seems to be a viable option to hasten the breeding of ‘‘improved’’ plants. Intuitively, genetic engineering would be a faster way to insert beneficial genes than through conventional or molecular breeding. Also, it would be the only option when genes of interest originate from cross barrier species, distant relatives, or from non-plant sources. Applications of genomic approaches and gene knockout strategies are progressing to accelerate efforts to assess systematically and understand complex quantitative traits such as acquired tolerance to temperature extremes. By using genetic and molecular approaches, a number of relevant genes have been identified and new information continually emerges to enrich the CBF cold-responsive pathway. Thus, the CBF/DREB1 genes are thought to be activators that integrate several components of the cold acclimation response by which plants increase their tolerance to low temperatures after exposure to non-freezing conditions. The DREB1/CBF genes have been successfully used to improve abiotic stress tolerance in a number of different crop plants. Studies on the other transcription factors associated with stress response are in progress.

However, the results of the transcriptome study demonstrate the highly complex nature of plant adaptation to low temperature. To overcome this problem a transgenic approach to promoting cold tolerance has been widely adopted, with some success. For example, increasing the accumulation of two compatible solutes, that is, glycinebetaine and trehalose, in transgenic rice by overexpressing either E. coli choline oxidase, or trehalose-6-phosphate synthase fused to trehalose-6- phosphate phosphatase, enhanced tolerance to both salt and cold. In fact a large number of genes identified in different studies have currently annotated with ‘‘unknown function’’ and involve new genes and new pathways indicates that our knowledge of the transcriptional control of the low temperature response is limited, and the regulation of these transcriptional responses is far more complex than previously believed. Information on the low-temperature transcriptome, proteome and metabolome is expected to continue to increase in the near future. This information is necessary for our understanding of the complex network of molecular changes that are important for chilling and freezing tolerance in crop plants. A well focused approach combining the molecular, physiological and metabolic aspects of cold stress tolerance is required for bridging the knowledge gaps between short- and long-term effects of the genes and their products, and between the molecular or cellular expression of the genes and the whole plant phenotype under stress. Collaborative research with many research groups to improve stress tolerant crop plants utilizing regulon biotechnology were undertaken under the aegis of CGAIR. We hope the results of these collaborative studies will contribute to the sustainable food production in developing countries and help to prevent the global-scale environmental damage.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Xin Z, Browse J. Cold comfort farm: the acclimation of plants to freezing temperatures. Plant Cell Environ. 2001;23:893–902. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Levitt J. In: Chilling, Freezing, and High Temperature Stress. Vol. 1. New York: Academic Press; 1980. Responses of plants to environmental stress. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. Molecular response to drought and cold stress. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 1996;7:161–167. doi: 10.1016/s0958-1669(96)80007-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Thomashow MF. Role of cold-responsive genes in plant freezing tolerance. Plant Physiol. 1998;118:1–8. doi: 10.1104/pp.118.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gilmour SJ, Sebolt AM, Salazar MP, Everard JD, Thomashow MF. Overexpression of the Arabidopsis CBF3 transcriptional activator mimics multiple biochemical changes associated with cold acclimation. Plant Physiol. 2000;124:1854–1865. doi: 10.1104/pp.124.4.1854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K. Transcriptional regulatory networks in cellular responses and tolerance to dehydration and cold stresses. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2006;57:781–803. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hannah MA, Heyer A G, Hincha DK. A global survey of gene regulation during cold acclimation in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Genet. 2005;1:e26. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0010026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wani SH, Sandhu JS, Gosal SS. Genetic engineering of crop plants for abiotic stress tolerance. In: Malik CP, Kaur B, Wadhwani C, editors. Advanced Topics in Plant Biotechnology and Plant Biology. New Delhi: MD Publications; 2008. pp. 149–183. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gosal SS, Wani SH, Kang MS. Biotechnology and drought tolerance. J. Crop Improv. 2009;23:19–54. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wani SH, Gosal SS. Introduction of OsglyII gene into Indica rice through particle bombardment for increased salinity tolerance. Biol. Plant. 2011;00 [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hsieh TH, Lee JT, Yang PT, Chiu LH, Charng Y, Wang YC, Chan MT. Heterology expression of the Arabidopsis C-repeat/dehydration response element binding factor 1 gene confers elevated tolerance to chilling and oxidative stresses in transgenic tomato. Plant Physiol. 2002;129:1086–1094. doi: 10.1104/pp.003442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Knight H, Veale EL, Warren GJ, Knight MR. The sfr6 mutation in Arabidopsis suppresses low temperature induction of genes dependent on the CRT/DRE sequence motif. Plant Cell. 1999;11:875–886. doi: 10.1105/tpc.11.5.875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Tamminen I, Mäkelä P, Heino P, Palva ET. Ectopic expression of ABI3 gene enhances freezing tolerance in response to abscisic acid and low temperature in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2001;25:1–8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2001.00927.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ashraf M, Athar HR, Harris PJC, Kwon TR. Some prospective strategies for improving crop salt tolerance. Adv. Agron. 2008;97:45–110. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sanghera GS, Wani SH. Innovative approaches to enhance genetic potential of rice for higher productivity under temperate conditions of Kashmir. J. Plant Sci. Res. 2008;24:99–113. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Rice environments In: Rice Almanac. 2nd. Philippines: IRRI; 1997. Anonymous. Rice environments; pp. 17–25. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sanghera GS, Zarger MA, Anwar A, Singh SP, Ahmad N, Rather MA. Studies on spikelet fertility and incidence of leaf blast on certain IRCTN rice genotypes under temperate conditions. Paper presented at National Symposium on plant Protection Strategies for sustainable Agri-Horticulture, SKAUST-Jammu. 2001. Oct 12-13, p. 125.
  • 18.Glaszmann JC, Kaw RN, Khush GS. Genetic divergence among cold tolerant rices (Oryza satva L.) Euphytica. 1990;45:95–104. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Rasolofo PR. Screening rice cultivars at seedling stage and anthesis for low temperature tolerance in Madagascar. IRRN. 1986;11:12–13. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Singh BD. Plant Breeding. Kalyani Publishers; 2000. pp. 443–460. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Saini JP, Tandon JP. Evaluating rices for cold tolerance. IRRN. 1985;10:9–10. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lia XH, Dai LY, Zhang JH. Factors related to cold tolerance at booting stage in Oryza sativa L. Chinese J. Rice Sci. 1998;12:6–10. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Oliver SN, Van Dongen JT, Alfred SC, Mamun EA, Zhao XC, Saini HS, Fernandes SF, Blanchard CL, Sutton BG, Geigenberger P, Dennis ES, Dolferus R. Cold induced repression of the rice anther-specific cell wall invertase gene OSINV4 is correlated with sucrose accumulation and pollen sterility. Plant Cell Environ. 2005;28:1534–1551. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Oliver SN, Dennis ES, Dolferus R. ABA regulates apoplastic sugar transport and is a potential signal for cold induced pollen sterility in rice. Plant Cell Physiol. 2007;48:1319–1330. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcm100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zhao X, Dolferuf R, Darvey N. Precision breeding of cold tolerant rice. IREC Farmers Newsletter. 2008;177:12–13. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Bhatnagar-Mathur P, Vadez V, Sharma KK. Transgenic approaches for abiotic stress tolerance in plants: retrospect and prospects. Plant Cell Rep. 2008;27:411–424. doi: 10.1007/s00299-007-0474-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Steponkus PL. Role of the plasma membrane in freezing injury and cold acclimation. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 1984;35:543–584. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Steponkus PL, Uemura M, Webb MS. A contrast of the cryostability of the plasma membrane of winter rye and spring oat-two species that widely differ in their freezing tolerance and plasma membrane lipid composition. In: Steponkus P L, editor. Adv.Low-Temperature Biol. Vol. 2. London: JAI Press; 1993. pp. 211–312. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Horvath I, Glatz A, Varvasovszki V, Torok Z, Pali T, Balogh G, Kovacs E, Nadasdi L, Benko S, Joo F, Vigh L. Membrane physical state controls the signaling mechanism of the heat shock response in Synechocystis PCC 6803: identification of hsp17 as a ‘fluidity gene’. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1998;95:3513–3518. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.7.3513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Orvar BL, Sangwan V, Omann F, Dhindsa RS. Early steps in cold sensing by plant cells: the role of actin cytoskeleton and membrane fluidity. Plant J. 2000;23:785–794. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00845.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Wu J, Lightner J, Waewick N, Browse J. Low-temperature damage and subsequent recovery of fab1 mutant Arabidopsis exposed to 28°C. Plant Physiol. 1997;113:347–356. doi: 10.1104/pp.113.2.347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Routaboul JM, Fischer SF, Browse J. Trienoic fatty acids are required to maintain chloroplast function at low temperatures. Plant Physiol. 2000;124:1697–1705. doi: 10.1104/pp.124.4.1697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hugly S, Somerville CA. role for membrane lipid polyunsaturation in chloroplast biogenesis at low temperature. Plant Physiol. 1992;99:197–202. doi: 10.1104/pp.99.1.197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Gomes E, Jakobsen MK, Axelsen KB, Geisler M, Palmgreen MG. Chilling tolerance in Arabidopsis involves ALA1, a member of a new family of putative aminophospholipid translocases. Plant Cell. 2000;12:2441–2453. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Strauss G, Hauser H. Stabilization of lipid bilayer vesicles by sucrose during freezing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1986;83:2422–2426. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.8.2422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Anchordoguy TJ, Rudolph AS, Carpenter JF, Crowe JH. Modes of interaction of cryoprotectants with membrane phospholipids during freezing. Cryobiology. 1987;24:324–331. doi: 10.1016/0011-2240(87)90036-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Epand RM, Shai Y, Segrest JP, Anantharamaiah GM. Mechanisms for the modulation of membrane bilayer properties by amphipathic helical peptides. Biopolymers. 1995;37:319–338. doi: 10.1002/bip.360370504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Olien CR, Smith MN. Ice adhesions in relation to freeze stress. Plant Physiol. 1977;60:499–503. doi: 10.1104/pp.60.4.499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Guy CL. Cold acclimation and freezing stress tolerance: role of protein metabolism. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 1990;41:187–223. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Aroca R, Irigoyen JJ, Sanchez-diaz M. Drought enhances maize chilling tolerance. II. Photosynthetic traits and protective mechanisms against oxidative stress. Physiol. Plant. 2003;117:540–549. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3054.2003.00065.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Livingston DP, Henson CA. Apoplastic sugars, fructans, fructan exohydrolase, and invertase in winter oat: responses to second-phase cold hardening. Plant Physiol. 1998;116:403–408. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Jones PG, Inouye M. The cold-shock response-a hot topic. Mol. Microbiol. 1994;11:811–818. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1994.tb00359.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Nakaminami K, Karlson DT, Imai R. Functional conservation of cold shock domains in bacteria and higher plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2006;103:10122–10127. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0603168103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Kim JS, Park SJ, Kwak KJ, Kim YO, Kim JY, Song J, Jang B, Jung CH, Kang H. Cold shock domain proteins and glycine-rich RNA-binding proteins from Arabidopsis thaliana can promote the cold adaptation process in Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:506–516. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl1076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Kim YO, Kim JS, Kang H. Cold-inducible zinc finger-containing glycine-rich RNA-binding protein contributes to the enhancement of freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2005;42:890–900. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02420.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Yu E, Owttrim GW. Characterization of the cold stress-induced cyanobacterial DEAD-box protein CrhC as an RNA helicase. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28:3926–3934. doi: 10.1093/nar/28.20.3926. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Gong Z, Lee H, Xiong L, Jagendorf A, Stevenson B, Zhu JK. RNA helicase-like protein as an early regulator of transcription factors for plant chilling and freezing tolerance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2002;99:11507–11512. doi: 10.1073/pnas.172399299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Gong Z, Dong CH, Lee H, Zhu J, Xiong L, Gong D, Stevenson B, Zhu JK. A DEAD box RNA helicase is essential for mRNA export and important for development and stress responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2005;17:256–267. doi: 10.1105/tpc.104.027557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Dong CH, Hu X, Tang W, Zheng X, Kim YS, Lee B, Zhu JK. A putative Arabidopsis nucleoporin, AtNUP160, is critical for RNA export and required for plant tolerance to cold stress. Mol. Cell Biol. 2006;26:9533–9543. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01063-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Snape JW, Semokhoskii A, Fish Sarma, R.N. Quarrie, S.A. Galiba G, Sutka J. Mapping frost tolerance loci in wheat and comparative mapping with other cereals. Acta Agron. Hungar. 1997;45:265–270. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Cushman JC, Bohnert HJ. Genomic approaches to plant stress tolerance. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2000;3:117–124. doi: 10.1016/s1369-5266(99)00052-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Flower S, Thomashow MF. Arabidopsis transcriptome profiling indicates that multiple regulatory pathways are activated during cold acclimation in addition to the CBF cold response pathway. Plant Cell. 2002;14:1675–1690. doi: 10.1105/tpc.003483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Kreps JA, Wu Y, Chang HS, Zhu T, Wang X, Harper JF. Transcriptome changes for Arabidopsis in response to salt, osmotic, and cold stress. Plant Physiol. 2002;130:2129–2141. doi: 10.1104/pp.008532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Seki M, Narusaka M, Ishida AJ, Nanjo T, Fujita M, Oono Y, Kamiya A, Nakajima M, Enju A, Sakurai T, Satou M, Akiyama K, Taji T, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Carninci P, Kawai J, Hayashizaki Y, Shinozaki K. Monitoring the expression profiles of 7000 Arabidopsis genes under drought, cold and high-salinity stresses using a full-length cDNA microarray. Plant J. 2002;3:279–292. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2002.01359.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Vogel JT, Zarka DG, Van Anbuskirk HA, Fowler SG, Thomashow MF. Roles of the CBF2 and ZAT12 transcription factors in configuring the low temperature transcriptome of Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2005;41:195–211. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02288.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Seki M. Regulatory network of gene expression in the drought and cold stress responses. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2003;6:410–417. doi: 10.1016/s1369-5266(03)00092-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Seki M, Satou M, Sakurai T, Akiyama K, Iida K, Ishida J, Nakajima M, Enju A, Narusaka M, Fujita M, Oono Y, Kamei A, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K. RIKEN Arabidopsis full length (RAFL) cDNA and its applications for expression profiling under abiotic stress conditions. J. Exp. Bot. 2004;55:213–223. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erh007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Holmberg N, Bulow L. Improving stress tolerance in plants by gene transfer. Trends Plant Sci. 1998;3:61–66. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Seki M, Kamei A, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K. Molecular responses to drought, salinity and frost: common and different paths for plant protection. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2003;14:194–199. doi: 10.1016/s0958-1669(03)00030-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Tester M, Bacic A. Abiotic stress tolerance in grasses. From model plants to crop plants. Plant Physiol. 2005;137:791–793. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.900138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Zhang JZ, Creelman RA, Zhu JK. From laboratory to field. Using information from Arabidopsis to engineer salt, cold, and drought tolerance in crops. Plant Physiol. 2004;135:615–621. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.040295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Vinocur B, Altman A. Recent advances in engineering plant tolerance to abiotic stress: achievements and limitations. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2005;16:123–132. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2005.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Thomashow MF. So what’s new in the field of plant cold acclimation? Lots! Plant Physiol. 2001;125:89–93. doi: 10.1104/pp.125.1.89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Artus NN, Uemura M, Steponkus PL, Gilmour SJ, Lin C, Thomashow MF. Constitutive expression of the cold-regulated Arabidopsis thaliana COR15a gene affects both choroplast and protoplast freezing tolerance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1996;93:13404–13409. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.23.13404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Kodama H, Hamada T, Horiguchi G, Nishimura M, Iba K. Genetic enhancement of cold tolerance by expression of a gene for chloroplast w-3 fatty acid desaturase in transgenic tobacco. Plant Physiol. 1994;105:601–605. doi: 10.1104/pp.105.2.601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Ishizaki-Nishizawa O, Fuji T, Azume M, Sekiguchi K, Murata N, Ohtani T, Toguri T. Low-temperature resistance of higher plants is significantly enhanced by a nonspecific cyanobacterial desaturase. Nat. Biotechnol. 1996;14:1003–1006. doi: 10.1038/nbt0896-1003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Ariizumi T, Kishitani S, Inatsugi R, Nishida I, Murata N, Toriyama K. An increase in unsaturation of fatty acids in phosphatidylglycerol from leaves improves the rates of photosynthesis and growth at low temperatures in transgenic rice seedlings. Plant Cell Physiol. 2002;43:751–758. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcf087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Sakamoto A, Sulpice R, Hou CX, Kinoshita M, Higashi SI, Kanaseki T, Nonaka H, Moon BY, Murata N. Genetic modification of the fatty acid unsaturation of phosphatidylglycerol in chloroplasts alters the sensitivity of tobacco plants to cold stress. Plant Cell Environ. 2003;27:99–105. [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Sui N, Li M, Zhao SJ, Li F, Liang H, Meng QW. Overexpression of glycerol-3-phosphate acyl transferase gene improves chilling tolerance in tomato. Planta. 2007;226:1097–1108. doi: 10.1007/s00425-007-0554-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Kumar N, Bhatt RP. Transgenics: An emerging approach for cold tolerance to enhance vegetables production in high altitude areas. Indian J. Crop Sci. 2006;1:8–12. [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Thomashow MF. Plant cold acclimation: freezing tolerance genes and regulatory mechanisms. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 1999;50:571–599. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.50.1.571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Houde M, Dallaire S, N'dong D, Sarhan F. Overexpression of the acidic dehydrin WCOR410 improves freezing tolerance in transgenic strawberry leaves. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2004;2:381–387. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2004.00082.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Stockinger EJ, Gilmour SJ, Thomashow MF. Arabidopsis thaliana CBF1 encodes an AP2 domain-containing transcriptional activator that binds to the C-repeat/DRE, a cis-acting DNA regulatory element that stimulates transcription in response to low temperature and water deficit. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1997;94:1035–1040. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.3.1035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Gilmour SJ, Zarka DG, Stockinger EJ, Salazar MP, Houghton JM, Thomashow MF. Low temperature regulation of the Arabidopsis CBF family of AP2 transcriptional activators as an early step in cold-induced COR gene expression. Plant J. 1998;16:433–442. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1998.00310.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Kasuga M, Liu Q, Miura S, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K. Improving plant drought, salt, and freezing tolerance by gene transfer of a single stress-inducible transcription factor. Nat. Biotechnol. 1999;17:287–291. doi: 10.1038/7036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Jaglo-Ottosen KR, Gilmour SJ, Zarka DG, Schabenberger O, Thomashow MF. Arabidopsis CBF1 overexpression induces COR genes and enhances freezing tolerance. Science. 1998;280:104–106. doi: 10.1126/science.280.5360.104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Jaglo-Ottosen KR, Kleff S, Amundsen KL, Zhang X, Haake V, Zhang JZ, Detis T, Thomashow MF. Components of the Arabidopsis C-repeat/dehydration-responsive element binding factor cold-response pathway are conserved in Brassica napus and other plant species. Plant Physiol. 2001;127:910–917. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Castiglioni P, Warner D, Bensen RJ, Anstrom DC, Harrison J, Stoecker M, Abad M, Kumar G, Salvador S, D’Ordine R, Navarro S, Back S, Fernandes M, Targolli J, Dasgupta S, Bonin C, Luethy M H, Heard JE. Bacterial RNA Chaperones Confer Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Plants and Improved Grain Yield in Maize under Water-Limited Conditions. Plant Physiol. 2008;147:446–455. doi: 10.1104/pp.108.118828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Hajela RK, Horvath DP, Gilmour SJ, Thomashow MF. Molecular cloning and expression of cor (cold-regulated) genes in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol. 1990;93:1246–1252. doi: 10.1104/pp.93.3.1246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Gilmour SJ, Fowler SG, Thomashow MF. Arabidopsis transcriptional activators CBF1, CBF2, and CBF3 have matching functional activities. Plant Mol. Biol. 2004;54:767–781. doi: 10.1023/B:PLAN.0000040902.06881.d4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Liu Q, Ksauga M, Sakuma Y, Abe H, Miura S, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K. Two transcription factors, DREB1 and DREB2, with an EREBP/AP2 DNA binding domain separate two cellular signal transduction pathways in drought and low-temperature-responsive gene expression, respectively, in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 1998;10:1391–1406. doi: 10.1105/tpc.10.8.1391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Haake V, Cook D, Riechmann JL, Pineda O, Thomashow MF, Zhang JZ. Transcription factor CBF4 is a regulator of drought adaptation in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2002;130:639–648. doi: 10.1104/pp.006478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Kasuga M, Miura S, Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. A combination of the Arabidopsis DREB1A gene and stress-inducible rd29A promoter improved drought and low-temperature stress tolerance in tobacco by gene transfer. Plant Cell Physiol. 2004;45:346–50. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pch037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Pellegrineschi A, Reynolds M, Pacheco M, Brito RM, Almeraya R, Yamaguch-Shinozaki K, Hoisington D. Stress-induced expression in wheat of the Arabidopsis thaliana DREB1A gene delays water stress symptoms under greenhouse conditions. Genome. 2004;47:493–500. doi: 10.1139/g03-140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Agarwal M, Hao Y, Kapoor A, Dong CH, Fujii H, Zheng X, Zhu JK. A R2R3 type MYB transcription factor is involved in the cold regulation of CBF genes and in acquired freezing tolerance. J. Biol. Chem. 2006;281:37636–37645. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M605895200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Murata N, Ishizaki-Nishizawa O, Higashi S, Hayashi S, Tasaka Y, Nishida I. Genetically engineered alteration in the chilling sensitivity of plants. Nature. 1992;356:710–713. [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Kovtum , Chiu WL, Tena G, Sheen J. Functional analysis of oxidative stress-activated mitogen activated protein kinase cascade in plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2000;97:2940–3005. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.6.2940. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Pennycooke JC, Jones ML, Stushnoff C. Down-regulating α -Galactosidase enhances freezing tolerance in transgenic Petunia. Plant Physiol. 2003;133:901–909. doi: 10.1104/pp.103.024554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Hara M, Terashima S, Fukaya T, Kubol T. Enhancement of cold tolerance and inhibition of lipid peroxidation by citrus dehydrin in transgenic tobacco. Planta. 2003;217:290–298. doi: 10.1007/s00425-003-0986-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Puhakainen T, Hess MW, Makela P, Svensson J, Heino P, Palva ET. Overexpression of multiple dehydrin genes enhances tolerance to freezing stress in Arabidopsis. Plant Mol. Biol. 2004;54:743–753. doi: 10.1023/B:PLAN.0000040903.66496.a4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Kaye C, Neven L, Hofig A, Li QB, Haskell D, Guy C. Characterization of a gene for spinach CAP160 and expression of two spinach cold-acclimation proteins in tobacco. Plant Physiol. 1998;116:1367–1377. doi: 10.1104/pp.116.4.1367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Iturriaga G, Schneider K, Salamini F, Bartels D. Expression of desiccation-related proteins from the resurrection plant Craterostigma plantagineum in transgenic tobacco. Plant Mol. Biol. 1992;20:555–558. doi: 10.1007/BF00040614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Dai X, Xu Y, Ma Q, Xu W, Wang T, Xue Y, Chong K. Overexpression of an R1R2R3 MYB gene, OsMYB3R-2, increases tolerance to freezing, drought and salt stress in transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2007;143:1739–1751. doi: 10.1104/pp.106.094532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Pramanik MH, Imai R. Functional identification of a trehalose 6-phosphate phosphatase gene that is involved in transient induction of trehalose biosynthesis during chilling stress in rice. Plant Mol. Biol. 2005;58:751–762. doi: 10.1007/s11103-005-7404-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Garg AK JK, Kim TG, Owens AP, Ranwala YD, Choi LV, Kochian RJ, Wu R. Trehalose accumulation in rice plants confers high tolerance levels to different abiotic stresses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2002;99:15898–15903. doi: 10.1073/pnas.252637799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Jang IC, Oh SJ, Seo JS, Choi WB, Song SI, Kim CH, Kim YS, Seo HS, Choi YD, Nahm BH. Expression of a bi-functional fusion of the Escherichia coli genes for trehalose-6-phosphate synthase and trehalose- 6-phosphate phosphatase in transgenic rice plants increases trehalose accumulation and abiotic stress tolerance without stunting growth. Plant Physiol. 2003;131:516–524. doi: 10.1104/pp.007237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Ge LF, Chao DY, Shi M, Zhu MZ, Gao JP, Lin HX. Overexpression of the trehalose-6-phosphate phosphatase gene OsTPP1 confers stress tolerance in rice and results in the activation of stress responsive genes. Planta. 2008;228:191–201. doi: 10.1007/s00425-008-0729-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Iordachescu M, Imai R. Trehalose biosynthesis in response to abiotic stresses. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2008;50:1223–1229. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7909.2008.00736.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Su CF, Wang YC, Hsieh TH, Lu CA, Tseng TH, Yu SM. A novel MYBS3-dependent pathway confers cold tolerance in rice. Plant Physiol. 2010;153:145–158. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.153015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. Molecular responses to dehydration and low temperature: differences and cross-talk between two stress signaling pathways. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2000;3:217–223. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Achard P, Gong F, Cheminant S, Alioua M, Hedden P, Genschika P. The cold-inducible CBF1 factor-dependent signaling pathway modulates the accumulation of the growth-repressing DELLA proteins via its effect on gibberellin metabolism. Plant Cell. 2008;20:2117–2129. doi: 10.1105/tpc.108.058941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Kim JC, Lee SH, Cheong YH, Yoo CM, Lee SI, Chun HJ, Yun DJ, Hong JC, Lee SY, Lim CO, Cho MJ. A novel cold-inducible zinc finger protein from soybean, SCOF-1, enhances cold tolerance in transgenic plants. Plant J. 2001;25:247–259. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2001.00947.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Zhu J, Shi H, Lee BH, Damsz B, Cheng S, Strim V, Zhu JK, Hasegawa PM, Bressan RA. An Arabidopsis homeodomain transcription factor gene, HOS9, mediates cold tolerance through a CBF-independent pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2004;101:9873–9878. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0403166101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Zhu J, Verslues PE, Zheng X, Lee BH, Zhan X, Manabe Y, Sokolchik I, Zhu Y, Dong CH, Zhu JK, Hasegawa PH, Bressan RA. HOS10 encodes an R2R3-type MYB transcription factor essential for cold acclimation in plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2005;102:9966–971. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0503960102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 105.Xin Z, Browse J. Eskimo1 mutants of Arabidopsis are constitutively freezing-tolerant. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1998;95:7799–7804. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.13.7799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Bouchabke-Coussa O, Quashie M, Seoane-Redondo J, Fortabat M, Gery C, Yu A, Linderme D, Trouverie J, Granier F, Téoulé E, Durand-Tardif M. ESKIMO1 is a key gene involved in water economy as well as cold acclimation and salt tolerance. BMC Plant Biol. 2008;8:125–151. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-8-125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Xin Z, Mandaokar A, Chen J, Last RL, Browse J. Arabidopsis ESK1 encodes a novel regulator of freezing tolerance. Plant J. 2007;49:786–799. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02994.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Zhang YJ, Yang JS, Guo SJ, Meng JJ, Zhang L, Wan SB, He QW, Li XG. Over-expression of the Arabidopsis CBF1 gene improves resistance of tomato leaves to low temperature under low irradiance. Plant Biol. 2010 doi: 10.1111/j.1438-8677.2010.00365.x. in press DOI: 10.1111/j.1438-8677.2010.00365.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Hughes MA, Dunn MA. The molecular biology of plant acclimation to low temperature. J. Exp. Bot. 1996;47:291–305. [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Browse J, Xin Z. Temperature sensing and cold acclimation. Curr Opin. Plant Biol. 2001;4:241–46. doi: 10.1016/s1369-5266(00)00167-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Umezawa T, Fujita M, Fujita Y, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K. Engineering drought tolerance in plants: discovering and tailoring genes to unlock the future. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2006;17:113–122. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2006.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Chinnusamy V, Zhu J, Zhu JK. Gene regulation during cold acclimation in plants. Physiol. Plant. 2006;126:52–61. [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Mahapatra SS, Wolfraim L, Poole RJ, Dhindsa RS. Molecular cloning and relationship to freezing tolerance of cold-acclimation-specific genes of alfalfa. Plant Physiol. 1989;89:375–380. doi: 10.1104/pp.89.1.375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Shameer K, Ambika S, Varghese SM, Karaba N, Udayakumar M, Sowdhamini R. STIFDB- Arabidopsis stress responsive transcription factor database. Inter. J. Plant Genom. 2009;5:1–8. doi: 10.1155/2009/583429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Nakashima K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. Molecular studies on stress-Responsive gene expression in Arabidopsis and improvement of stress tolerance in crop plants by regulon biotechnology. JARQ. 2005;39:221–229. [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Sen Gupta A, Heinen JL, Holady AS, Burke JJ, Allen RD. Increased resistance to oxidative stress in transgenic plants that over-express chloroplastic Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1993;90:1629–1633. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.4.1629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Pilon-Smits EAH, Ebskamp MJM, Paul MJ, Jeuken MJW, Weisbeek P J, Smeekens S.C.M. Improved performance of transgenic fructan-accumulating tobacco under drought stress. Plant Physiol. 1995;107:125–130. doi: 10.1104/pp.107.1.125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Mckersie BD, Bowley SR, Harjanto E, Leprince O. Water deficit tolerance and field performance of transgenic alfalfa overexpressing superoxide dismutase. Plant Physiol. 1996;111:1177–1181. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.4.1177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Roxas VP, Smith RK, Jr, Allen ER, Allen RD. Overexpression of glutathione S-transferase/ glutathione peroxidase enhances the growth of transgenic tobacco seedlings during stress. Nat. Biotechnol. 1997;15:988–991. doi: 10.1038/nbt1097-988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Ouellet F, Vazquez-Tello A, Sarhan F. The wheat wcs120 promoter is cold-inducible in both monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous species. FEBS Lett. 1998;423:324–328. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(98)00116-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Sakamoto A, Murata AN. Metabolic engineering of rice leading to biosynthesis of glycinebetaine and tolerance to salt and cold. Plant Mol. Biol. 1998;38:1011–1019. doi: 10.1023/a:1006095015717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Hayashi H, Sakamoto A, Nonaka H, Chen THH, Murata N. Enhanced germination under high-salt conditions of seeds of transgenic Arabidopsis with a bacterial gene (codA) for choline oxidase. J. Plant Res. 1998;111:357–362. [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Nanjo T, Kobayashi M, Yoshiba Y, Kakubari Y, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K. Antisense supression of proline degradation improves tolerance to freezing and salinity in Arabidopsis thaliana. FEBS Lett. 1999;461:205–210. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(99)01451-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Lee SC, Won HK, An K, An G, Kim SR. Ectopic expression of a cold- inducible transcription factor, CBF1/DREB1b, in transgenic rice (Oryza sativa L.) Mol. Cells. 2004;18:107–114. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Mukhopadhyay A, Vij S, Tyagi AK. Overexpression of a zinc-finger protein gene from rice confers tolerance to cold, dehydration, and salt stress in transgenic tobacco. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2004;101:6309–6314. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0401572101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Vannini C, Locatelli F, Bracale M, Magnani E, Marsoni M, Osnato M, Mattana M, Baldoni E, Coraggio I. Overexpression of the rice Osmyb4 gene increases chilling and freezing tolerance of Arabidopsis thaliana plants. Plant J. 2004;37:115–127. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2003.01938.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Zhu J, Verslues PE, Zheng X, Lee BH, Zhan X, Manabe Y, Sokolchik I, Zhu Y, Dong CH, Zhu JK, Hasegawa PH, Bressan RA. HOS10 encodes an R2R3-type MYB transcription factor essential for cold acclimation in plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2005;102:9966–9971. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0503960102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 128.Nakayama K, Okawa K, Kakizaki T, Honma T, Itoh H, Inaba T. Arabidopsis Cor15am is a chloroplast stromal protein that has cryoprotective activity and forms oligomers. Plant Physiol. 2007;144:513–523. doi: 10.1104/pp.106.094581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Chen QF, Xiao S, Chye ML. Overexpression of the Arabidopsis 10-kDa acyl-CoA-binding protein ACBP6 enhances freezing tolerance. Plant Physiol. 2008;148:304–315. doi: 10.1104/pp.108.123331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Ma Q, Dai X, Xu Y, Guo J, Liu Y, Chen N, Xiao J, Zhang D, Xu Z, Zhang X, Chong K. Enhanced tolerance to chilling stress in OSMYB3R-2 transgenic rice is mediated by alteration in cell cycle and ectopic expression of stress genes. Plant Physiol. 2009;150:244–256. doi: 10.1104/pp.108.133454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Kim MH, Sasaki K, Imai R. Cold shock domain protein 3 regulates freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Biol. Chem. 2009;284:23454–23460. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.025791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Zhai H, Bai X, Zhu Y, Li Y, Cai H, Ji W, Ji Z, Liu X, Liu X, Li J. A single-repeat R3-MYB transcription factor MYBC1 negatively regulates freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2010;394:1018–1023. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.03.114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Zhu B, Xiong AS, Peng RH, Xu J, Jin XF, Memg XR, Quan-Hong Y. Over-expression of ThpI from Choristoneura fumiferana enhances tolerance to cold in Arabidopsis. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2010;37:961–966. doi: 10.1007/s11033-009-9759-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Current Genomics are provided here courtesy of Bentham Science Publishers

RESOURCES