Abstract
Although amino acids can function as signaling molecules in the regulation of many cellular processes, mechanisms surrounding l-threonine involvement in embryonic stem cell (ESC) functions have not been explored. Thus, we investigated the effect of l-threonine on regulation of mouse (m)ESC self-renewal and related signaling pathways. In l-threonine- depleted mESC culture media mRNA of self-renewal marker genes, [3H]thymidine incorporation, expression of c-Myc, Oct4, and cyclins protein was attenuated. In addition, resupplying l-threonine (500 μm) after depletion restores/maintains the mESC proliferation. Disruption of the lipid raft/caveolae microdomain through treatment with methyl-β-cyclodextrin or transfection with caveolin-1 specific small interfering RNA blocked l-threonine-induced proliferation of mESCs. Addition of l-threonine induced phosphorylation of Akt, ERK, p38, JNK/SAPK, and mTOR in a time-dependent manner. This activity was blocked by LY 294002 (PI3K inhibitor), wortmannin (PI3K inhibitor), or an Akt inhibitor. l-threonine-induced activation of mTOR, p70S6K, and 4E-BP1 as well as cyclins and Oct4 were blocked by PD 98059 (ERK inhibitor), SB 203580 (p38 inhibitor) or SP 600125 (JNK inhibitor). Furthermore, l-threonine induced phosphorylation of raptor and rictor binding to mTOR was completely inhibited by 24 h treatment with rapamycin (mTOR inhibitor); however, a 10 min treatment with rapamycin only partially inhibited rictor phosphorylation. l-Threonine induced translocation of rictor from the membrane to the cytosol/nuclear, which blocked by pretreatment with rapamycin. In addition, rapamycin blocked l-threonine-induced increases in mRNA expressions of trophoectoderm and mesoderm marker genes and mESC proliferation. In conclusion, l-threonine stimulated ESC G1/S transition through lipid raft/caveolae-dependent PI3K/Akt, MAPKs, mTOR, p70S6K, and 4E-BP1 signaling pathways.
Keywords: Amino Acid, Cell Cycle, Embryonic Stem Cell, MAP Kinases (MAPKs), mTOR Complex (mTORC), Threonine
Introduction
A growing number of reports clearly demonstrate that amino acids are able to control many physiological functions, including regulation of cell signaling and gene expression, as well as transport and metabolism of amino acids themselves (1, 2). Although the molecular mechanisms involved in the control of gene expression by amino acid availability have been extensively studied in lower eukaryotes such as yeasts, the control of transcriptional events including signaling pathways, transcription factors, and their corresponding cis-acting DNA sequences is still unclear in stem cells. Moreover, it has been shown that the amino acid requirement is a developmentally regulated permissive event that occurs during a 4–8-h period at the early blastocyst stage in mice and that amino acids are involved in regulating early embryonic development (3). Therefore, it is now widely accepted that amino acids can stimulate signal transduction and function as signal molecules regulating many embryonic stem cell (ESC)2 functions (4, 5). For instance, glutamine synthetase, which is the only enzyme which synthesizes glutamine de novo, is essential in early mouse embryogenesis (6, 7). In addition, l-proline induces formation of a distinct pluripotent cell population with primitive ectoderm characteristics in culture (8). Furthermore, interestingly, l-threonine-deprived culture media induces abnormal ESC colony growth and decreases alkaline phosphatase marker staining levels which present ESCs self-renewal (9). Nevertheless, amino acid-dependent regulation of ESC function has not been previously described and related signal pathways remain unclear.
Threonine, one of the essential amino acids, is an α-amino acid containing a polar hydroxyl group which enables participation in hydrogen bonding, an important factor in protein structure and amino acid transporters are associated with membrane rafts (10). It suggests that membrane raft/caveolae is important for the regulation of amino acid transporter functions. Amino acid and amino acid receptors have been shown to activate the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathway which exists in two distinct protein complexes, mTOR complex1 (mTORC1) and mTOR complex2 (mTORC2). The mTORC1 complex mediates cell growth and protein synthesis (11). Unlike mTORC1, mTORC2 is thought to mediate cell proliferation and cell survival by direct phosphorylation of Akt at critical regulatory sites required for maximal Akt kinase activity (12). In addition, it is reported that activation of mTOR signaling is required for ESC proliferation (13). Cell cycle progression is tightly regulated by the coordinated action of cyclin and cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) complexes (14). Furthermore, depletion of ractor and rictor increases cells in the G1 phase while mTORC1 and mTORC2 inhibition elicits down-regulation of cyclin D1 and up-regulation of p27 levels (15). Moreover, mTOR−/− mouse embryos die due to failure of inner cell mass (ICM) development and trophoectoderm proliferation (16). Therefore, the mechanisms through which threonine regulates mTOR pose a major unanswered question with regard to ESCs.
Currently, ESCs represent an incredible in vitro model to study critical aspects involving stem cells and early embryonic development. ESCs are indeed the only stem cell type able to self-renew indefinitely and differentiate into cellular derivates of three lineages. Several studies with regard to this matter have detailed peculiar in vitro culturing protocols for ESCs, with the main effort being to optimize ESC pluripotency, maintenance, and control induction of differentiation. Potential interplay between amino acids and pluripotent cells may regulate cell fate suggesting that medium constituents used for the maintenance of ESCs should be carefully appraised and any associated bioactivities understood. While significant advances in the establishment of optimal culture conditions have been made, an understanding of the role of each component in currently available ESC culture media remains incomplete. Furthermore, advanced understanding in regulation mechanisms of ES cells function through amino acids would be help to achieve the optimal culture conditions for ES cells therapeutic application. However, although significant advances in establishment of optimal culture conditions, role of each components of available media for ES cells culture are still unclear. In this respect, one of the first issues which must be addressed is the necessity of expanding ESCs in vitro in chemically defined and animal-product-free conditions. Among the amino acids, threonine has the ability to regulate gene expression in a number of physiologic processes, as reported in a recent paper illustrating the vast panel of regulated genes (17). Thus, in this study, we examined the molecular mechanisms involved in the effects of threonine on ESC proliferation, focusing on signal molecules responsive to threonine.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Materials
Mouse (m)ES cell lines ES-E14TG2a and ES-R1 were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA). In the present study, ES-E14TG2a cells were primarily used, and ES-R1 cells were used to examine whether the responses observed in ES-E14TG2a cells is depended on cell type. Fetal bovine serum (FBS) was purchased from BioWhittaker (Walkersville, MD). LY 294002, wortmannin, PD 98059, SB 203580, SP 600125, rapamycin, and monoclonal anti-β-actin were obtained from Sigma. Akt inhibitor (1L6-hydroxymethyl-chiro-inositol-2-(R)-2-O-methyl-3-O-octadecyl-sn-lycerocarbonate) was purchased from Calbiochem (La Jolla, CA). All pharmacological inhibitors used in this study did not affect cell proliferation and signal pathway activation at treated concentrations. However, combination treatment of inhibitors for PI3K/Akt, MAPKs, and mTOR decreased [3H]thymidine incorporation (supplemental Figs. S1 and S2). [3H]thymidine was obtained from Dupont/NEN (Boston, MA). Phospho-ERK, ERK, phospho-JNK/SAPK, JNK/SAPK, phospho-p38, p38, phospho-Akt (Thr308 and Ser473), and Akt antibodies were purchased from New England Biolabs (Herts, UK). The Oct4, c-Myc, cyclin D1, and cyclin E antibodies were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA). The phospho-mTOR, phospho-p70S6K, and phospho-4E-BP1 antibodies were obtained from Cell Signaling Technology, Inc. (Danvers, MA). The goat anti-rabbit IgG was supplied by Jackson ImmunoResearch (West Grove, PA). Liquiscint was obtained from National Diagnostics (Parsippany, NY). All other reagents were of the highest purity commercially available and were used as received.
ESC Culture
The mESCs were cultured in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Media (DMEM) (Invitrogen, Gaithersburg, MD) supplemented with 3.7 g/liter sodium bicarbonate, 1% penicillin, and streptomycin, 1.7 mm l-glutamine, 0.1 mm β–mercaptoethanol, 5 ng/ml mouse leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF), and 15% FBS, without a feeder layer. The cells were grown on gelatinized 12-well plates or 60-mm culture dishes in an incubator maintained at 37 °C in humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. After 2–3 days of culture, cells were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and maintained in serum- and l-threonine-free DMEM (WelGENE; Daegu, Korea), which contained all other supplements at the concentrations indicated above to synchronize ESCs. After a 24-h incubation period, the cells were washed twice with PBS and given fresh serum- and l-threonine-free media containing the designated agents for the time periods indicated. For the time course treatment, the cells were washed twice with PBS and given fresh serum- and l-threonine-free media, and then incubated for 24 h. After incubation, l-threonine was added to the medium in reverse order, and all samples were harvested at zero time point.
Alkaline Phosphatase Staining
Cells were washed twice with PBS and fixed with 4% formaldehyde for ∼15 min at room temperature. After washing the cells with PBS, they were incubated with an alkaline phosphatase substrate solution (200 μg/ml naphthol AS-MX phosphate, 2% N,N-dimethylformamide, 0.1 m Tris, pH 8.2, and 1 mg/ml Fast Red TR salt) for 10–15 min at room temperature. After a wash with PBS, the cells were photographed.
Immunofluorescence Staining
Cells were fixed and labeled with rabbit anti-Oct4, or mouse anti-SSEA-1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) at a ratio of 1:50, followed by fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated anti-mouse IgM at 1:100, Alexa Fluor® 555 goat anti-rabbit IgG at 1:100, or labeled with FITC-conjugated mouse anti-BrdU each for 1 h at room temperature. Images were obtained using a FluoView 300 fluorescence microscope (Olympus; Tokyo, Japan).
[3H]Thymidine Incorporation
The [3H]thymidine incorporation experiments were performed as previously described by Brett et al. (18). Briefly, mouse ESCs were synchronized in the G0/G1 phase by culture in serum- and l-threonine-free media for 24 h before stimulation with l-threonine. After the incubation period, 1 μCi of [methyl-3H]thymidine (specific activity: 74 GBq/mmol, 2.0 Ci/mmol; Amersham Biosciences; Buckinghamshire, UK) was added to the cultures for 1 hr at 37 °C. Cellular [3H]thymidine uptake was quantified by liquid scintillation counting of harvested cellular material. All values were converted from absolute counts to percentages of control and reported as means ± S.E. of triplicate experiments.
Cell Number Count
To determine total cell numbers, the cells were washed twice with PBS and trypsinized from the culture dishes. The cell suspension was mixed with a 0.4% (w/v) trypan blue solution, and the number of live cells was determined using a hemocytometer. Cells failing to exclude the dye were considered nonviable.
RNA Isolation and Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)
Total RNA was extracted from cells treated with each of the designated agents using STAT-60, a monophasic solution of phenol and guanidine isothiocyanate (Tel-Test, Inc.; Friendswood, TX). Real-time quantification of RNA targets was performed in a Rotor-Gene 6000 real-time thermal cycling system (Corbett Research; NSW, Australia) using QuantiTect SYBR Green RT-PCR Kits (Qiagen; Valencia, CA). The primers used are described in supplemental Table S1. The reaction mixture (20 μl) contained 200 ng of total RNA, 0.5 μm of each primer, and enzyme and fluorescent dye amounts recommended by the supplier. The Rotor-Gene 6000 cycler was programmed as follows: 30 min at 50 °C for reverse transcription; 15 min at 95 °C for DNA polymerase activation; 15 s at 95 °C for denaturing; and 45 cycles of 15 s at 94 °C, 30 s at 55 °C, and 30 s at 72 °C. Data collection was carried out during the extension step (30 s at 72 °C) and analysis was performed using the software provided by the manufacturer. Following PCR, melting curve analysis was used to verify the specificity and identity of the PCR products.
Small Interfering RNA (siRNA) Transfection
ESCs were grown until 75% confluent. The cells were transfected for 24 h with either a SMARTpool of caveolin-1 (cav-1) specific siRNA (Dharmacon; Lafayette, CO) or non-targeting siRNA as a negative control (Dharmacon) using Dharmafect transfection reagent (Dharmacon). The construct targeting cav-1 was comprised of the following 3′ (sense) and 5′ (antisense) pairs: 3′-GCUAUUGGCAAGAUAUUCAUU and 5′-UGAAUAUCUUGCCAAUAGCUU; 3′-GCACAUCUGGGCGGUUGUAUU and 5′-UACAACCGCCCAGAUGUGCUU; 3′-GCAAAUACGUGGACUCCGAUU and 5′-UCGGAGUCCACGUAUUUGCUU; and 3′-GUCCAUACCUUCUGCGAUCUU and 5′-GAUCGCAGAAGGUAUGGACUU. The non-targeting siRNA was 5′-UGGUUUACAUGUCGACUAA-3′. After 24 h, transfection mixtures were replaced with serum- and l-threonine-free DMEM, and cells were maintained.
Immunoprecipitation
The formation of mTORC1 and mTORC2 was analyzed by immunoprecipitation and Western blotting. Cells were lysed with lysis buffer (1% Triton X-100 in 50 mm Tris-HCl, pH 7.4 containing 150 mm NaCl, 5 mm EDTA, 2 mm Na3VO4, 2.5 mm Na4PO7, 100 mm NaF, 200 nm microcystin lysine-arginine, and protease inhibitors). Cell lysates (300 μg) were mixed with 10 μg of mouse anti-mTOR antibody. The samples were incubated for 4 h, mixed with protein A/G PLUS-agarose immunoprecipitation reagent (Pierce) and then incubated for an additional 12 h. The beads were washed four times, and the bound proteins were released from the beads by boiling in sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) sample buffer for 5 min. Samples were analyzed by Western blotting with anti-phospho-mTOR, phospho-raptor, phospho-rictor, or mTOR antibodies.
Western Blot Analysis
Cells were harvested, washed twice with PBS, and lysed in lysis buffer (20 mm Tris, pH 7.5, 1 mm EDTA, 1 mm EGTA, 1% Triton X-100, 1 mg/ml aprotinin, 1 mm phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), and 0.5 mm sodium orthovanadate) for 30 min on ice. The lysates were cleared by centrifugation (30 min at 15,000 rpm, 4 °C), and the protein concentration was determined using the Bradford method (19). Equal amounts of protein (20 μg) were resolved by 10% SDS-PAGE and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes. The membranes were washed with TBST (10 mm Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 150 mm NaCl, and 0.01% Tween-20), blocked with TBST containing 5% skim milk for 1 h, and incubated with the appropriate primary antibodies at the dilutions recommended by the suppliers. The membranes were then washed and the primary antibodies detected with goat anti-rabbit IgG or goat anti-mouse IgG conjugated to horseradish peroxidase. Immunoreactive proteins were visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence (Amersham Biosciences; Buckinghamshire, UK).
Flow Cytometry for Proliferation Index
Cells were dissociated in trypsin/EDTA, pelleted by centrifugation, and resuspended at ∼106 cells/ml in PBS containing 0.1% BSA. The cells were then fixed with 70% ice-cold ethanol for 30 min at 4 °C, followed by incubation in a freshly prepared nuclei staining buffer consisting of 250 μg/ml propidium iodide (PI) and 100 μg/ml RNase for 30 min at 37 °C. Cell cycle histograms were generated after analyzing the PI-stained cells by FACS (Beckman Coulter). The samples were analyzed using CXP software (Beckman Coulter) and the proliferation indices [(S + G2/M)/(G0/G1 + S + G2/M)] calculated.
Flow Cytometry for Oct4 Expression and BrdU Incorporation
BrdU-labeled cells were dissociated in trypsin/EDTA, pelleted by centrifugation, and resuspended at ∼106 cells/ml in PBS containing 0.1% BSA. The cells were then fixed with 70% ice-cold ethanol for 30 min at 4 °C, followed by incubation with rabbit anti-Oct4 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) at a ratio of 1:50, followed by Alexa Fluor® 555 goat anti-rabbit IgG at 1:100, or labeled with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated mouse anti-BrdU each for 1 h at room temperature.
MTT Cell Viability Assay
Cell viability was determined using the conversion of MTT to formazan via mitochondrial oxidation. mES cells were pretreated with indicated inhibitors prior to incubation with/without l-threonine for 24 h. MTT solution was then added to each well at a final concentration of 1 mg/ml per well and the plates were incubated at 37 °C for another 2 h. After incubation, 150 μl of DMSO was added to each well to dissolve the formazan formed and the absorbance was read at 570 nm using a spectrophotometer.
Statistical Analysis
Results are expressed as means ± S.E. All experiments were analyzed by ANOVA, and some experiments were examined by comparing the treatment means to the control using a Bonferroni-Dunn test. A p value of < 0.05 was considered significant.
RESULTS
Effect of l-Threonine on Transcriptional Regulation of Self-renewal
To determine whether mESCs maintain their pluripotency under long-term l-threonine depletion, we incubated the cells without l-threonine for various periods (0–4 days) and examined them for the expression of self-renewal and lineage specific differentiation markers. Depletion of l-threonine from the media decreased mRNA expression levels of Oct4, nanog, FOXD3, and Rex1, but increased Sox2 in a time-dependent manner. In addition, l-threonine depletion up-regulated trophoectoderm (Cdx2 and FGF4) and mesoderm (brachyury and MESP1) markers, but did not affect on endoderm and ectoderm markers expression, except Sox1 (Fig. 1A). In agreement with mRNA expression results, we observed decreases in c-Myc and Oct4 protein expression levels (Fig. 1B). In addition, treatment with l-threonine (500 μm) recovered c-Myc, SSEA-1 (the stage-specific embryonic antigen-1 carbohydrate epitope), and Oct4 protein expression levels, which had been decreased by depletion of l-threonine for 1 day (Fig. 1C). l-Threonine-induced SSEA-1 expression was confirmed by immunofluorescence staining (Fig. 1D). To determine whether threonine was involved in regulation of ESC self-renewal, we double-labeled cells for Oct4 expression and BrdU incorporation during threonine exposure. In these experiments, treatment with l-threonine maintained Oct4 expression and BrdU incorporation, which had decreased in threonine-depleted ESCs, reflecting the fact that threonine mediated both proliferation and maintenance of self-renewal in mESCs (Fig. 1, E and F). In addition, alkaline phosphatase stain levels were increased with the addition of l-threonine (Fig. 1G). Taken together, these results indicated that l-threonine affects the mESC self-renewal. Therefore, in the next series of experiments, we sought to identify the cell signaling pathways involved in regulation of mESCs with the addition of l-threonine.
FIGURE 1.
Effect of l-threonine on transcriptional regulation of self-renewal of the mESC. The mESCs were depleted of l-threonine for 4 days, and the total RNA was extracted as described under “Experimental Procedures.” The mRNA of the self-renewal marker genes (Oct4, Sox2, nanog, FOXD3, and Rex1), trophoectoderm marker genes (Cdx2, FGF4, and GATA3), endoderm marker genes (GATA4 and GATA6), mesoderm marker genes (brachyury and MESP1), and ectoderm marker genes (Sox1, NeuroD, and FGF5) were detected (A). Data are presented as means ± S.E. (standard error) of three different experiments, each from triplicate dishes. *, p < 0.05 versus control. Total cell lysates of mESCs (E14TG2a and R1) were subjected to depletion of l-threonine for 4 days and c-Myc and Oct4 expression were detected (B). The mESCs (E14TG2a and R1) were treated with 500 μm l-threonine after 24 h-incubation with l-threonine-free media for various times (0–48 h) and c-Myc, SSEA-1, and Oct4 expression was detected by Western blot analysis as described under “Experimental Procedures” (C). The lower parts depict the mean ± S.E. of three different experiments, each from triplicate dishes. *, p < 0.05 versus control. The cells were treated with l-threonine for 24 h, and then double labeled with SSEA-1 and PI (D). Scale bars represent 100 μm. The example shown is representative of four experiments. The mESCs were exposed to 500 μm l-threonine after 24-h incubation with l-threonine-free media for 24 h and double-labeled with Oct4 and BrdU antibodies simultaneously (E). Scale bars represent 100 μm. The example shown is representative of four experiments. The mESCs were treated with 500 μm l-threonine for 24 h and dissociated in trypsin/EDTA. And then, double-labeled with Oct4 and BrdU antibodies and detected with flowcytometry (F). The percentage of cells described with the mean ± S.E. of three different experiments, each from triplicate dishes. *, p < 0.05 versus control. Alkaline phosphatase enzyme activity was assessed in mESCs treated with and without l-threonine (500 μm) for 24 h (G). Scale bars represent 100 μm. The example shown is representative of four experiments.
Effect of l-Threonine on Cell Cycle Regulatory Protein Expression Levels and DNA Synthesis
To determine the effect of l-threonine on proliferation of mESCs, we incubated the cells with culture media without l-threonine and serum for 4 days. Depletion of l-threonine from the culture media decreased [3H]thymidine incorporation and expression of cyclin D1 and cyclin E in a time-dependent manner (Fig. 2, A and B). We next measured the effect of the addition of l-threonine on cell cycle regulatory protein expression levels and DNA synthesis. Addition of l-threonine after 24 h of deprivation increased expression of cyclins and [3H]thymidine incorporation in both time- and dose-dependent manners. Cyclin D1 and E expression levels were increased when incubated with 500 μm of l-threonine for 24 h (Fig. 2, C and D). Consistent with these results, we observed significant increases in [3H]thymidine incorporation after incubating cells with more than 100 μm l-threonine at 24 h (Fig. 2, E and F). These results suggest that l-threonine plays an important role in regulation of mESC G1/S phase transition.
FIGURE 2.
Effect of l-threonine on mESC proliferation. Cells were incubated in culture media with and without l-threonine for 4 days. [3H]thymidine incorporation and cyclin D1 and cyclin E expression were then examined (A and B). The lower part depicted by bars denotes mean ± S.E. of three experiments for each condition determined by densitometry relative to β-actin. *, p < 0.05 versus control. Cells were treated with different doses of l-threonine (0–10 mm) after 24 h of incubation with l-threonine-free media. The total cell lysates were subjected to SDS-PAGE and blotted with cyclin D1 and cyclin E, or β-actin antibodies (C). The mESC (E14TG2a and R1) were treated with l-threonine (500 μm) for various time periods (0–48 h) (D). The lower part depicted by bars denotes the mean ± S.E. of three experiments for each condition determined from densitometry relative to β-actin. *, p < 0.05 versus control. The cells were treated with different doses of l-threonine (E14TG2a or R1) for 24 h or incubation for various time points with 500 μm l-threonine (E14TG2a) and were pulsed with 1 μCi of [3H]thymidine for 1 h (E and F). Data are represented as mean ± S.E. of three different experiments, each from triplicate dishes. *, p < 0.05 versus control; #, p < 0.05 versus threonine-depleted control.
Role of Lipid Raft/Caveolae on l-Threonine-induced ESC Proliferation
To examine whether the l-threonine effect operated through lipid raft of the plasma membrane, we incubated cells in l-threonine-depleted media with or without 0.01 μm methyl-β-cyclodextrin (MβCD) for 1 h or transfected them with cav-1 siRNA for 24 h, and then treat them with l-threonine (500 μm) for 24 h. Pretreatment with MβCD or cav-1 siRNA decreased the expression of l-threonine (500 μm)-induced cyclin D1, CDK4, cyclin E, and CDK2 protein expression levels (Fig. 3, A and B). In addition, disruption of lipid raft with MβCD and cav-1 knock-down decreased c-Myc and Oct4 protein expression levels (Fig. 3, C and D). Pretreatment with MβCD also decreased l-threonine-induced increases in [3H]thymidine incorporation (Fig. 3E). Consistent with these results, pretreatment with MβCD significantly decreased l-threonine-induced increases in the proliferation index and total cell numbers compared with the cells with l-threonine added (Fig. 3, F and G). These results suggest that the effects of l-threonine on mESC self-renewal are mediated by lipid raft/caveolae.
FIGURE 3.
Relationship between lipid raft and l-threonine-induced mESC proliferation. Cells were preincubated with 0.01 μm MβCD for 1 h or transfected for 24 h with either a SMARTpool of cav-1 siRNA (200 pmol) or non-targeting control siRNA using Lipofectamine 2000 for 24 h prior to treatment with l-threonine (500 μm) for 24 h. After incubation, cyclin D1, cyclin E, c-Myc, and Oct4 expression were detected (A–D). The lower part depicts the mean ± S.E. of four different experiments, each from triplicate dishes. *, p < 0.05 versus control, **, p < 0.05 versus l-threonine alone. Cells (E14TG2a and R1) were pretreated with 0.01 μm MβCD for 1 h prior to being incubation with 500 μm l-threonine for 24 h. The mESCs were pulsed with [3H]thymidine for the last 1 h (E). Cells (E14TG2a and R1) were then washed with PBS, fixed, stained, and analyzed by flow cytometry (F). Gates were manually configured to determine the percentage of cells in S phase based on DNA content. The data were calculated using a proliferation index [(S + G2/M)/(G0/G1 + S + G2/M)] and reported as the mean ± S.E. of four different experiments, each conducted in triplicate. *, p < 0.05 versus control; **, p < 0.05 versus l-threonine alone. The mESCs were pretreated with MβCD prior to 24 h of incubation with l-threonine and the number of cells was counted using a hemocytometer (G). Values are means ± S.E. of three different experiments, each from triplicate dishes. *, p < 0.05 versus control. **, p < 0.05 versus l-threonine alone.
Involvement of PI3K/Akt and MAPKs Signaling
We treated cells incubated with threonine depletion media with 500 μm l-threonine for up to 120 min to detect Akt phosphorylation and examine whether the addition of l-threonine affects the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway to induce mESC proliferation. As shown in Fig. 4A, phosphorylation of Akt in phosphorylation sites Thr308 and Ser473 increased in a time-dependent manner and maximum phosphorylation was observed at 30–90 min after the addition of l-threonine. Pretreatment with MβCD and knock-down of cav-1 blocked l-threonine-induced Akt phosphorylation (Fig. 4, B and C). Furthermore, pretreatment with PI3K inhibitors (LY 294002, 10−6 m; or wortmannin, 10−7 m), or an Akt inhibitor (10−5 m) blocked the l-threonine-induced recovery of cyclin D1, cyclin E, c-Myc, and Oct4 expression (Fig. 4, D and E). In accordance with these results, pretreatment with PI3K inhibitors and Akt inhibitor blocked l-threonine-induced increase in [3H]thymidine incorporation and total cell numbers (Fig. 4, F and G).
FIGURE 4.
Involvement of PI3K/Akt activation on l-threonine-induced mESC proliferation. Cells were treated with 500 μm l-threonine after a 24 h of incubation with l-threonine-free media for different time periods (0–180 min). The phosphorylation of Akt Thr308 and Ser473 were detected as described under “Experimental Procedures” (A). Cells were transfected for 24 h with either a SMARTpool of cav-1 siRNA (200 pmol) or non-targeting control siRNA using Lipofectamine 2000 prior to treatment with l-threonine (500 μm) for 1 h (B). Cells were pretreated with 0.01 μm MβCD for 1 h prior to the addition of l-threonine (500 μm) for 1 h (C). Cells (E14TG2a and R1) were pretreated with LY 294002 (PI3K inhibitor, 10−6 m), wortmannin (PI3K inhibitor, 10−7 m), or Akt inhibitor (10−5 m) for 30 min prior to being treated with l-threonine (500 μm) for 24 h. Total protein was extracted and blotted with cyclin D1, cyclin E, c-Myc, Oct4, or β-actin antibodies (D and E). The lower part depicted by bars denotes the mean ± S.E. of three different experiments for each condition determined from densitometry relative to β-actin. *, p < 0.05 versus control. **, p < 0.05 versus l-threonine alone. Cells (E14TG2a and R1) were pretreated with LY 294002, wortmannin, or Akt inhibitor for 30 min prior to being treated with l-threonine (500 μm) for 24 h. Cell were subsequently pulsed with 1 μCi of [3H]thymidine for 1 h (F). Data represent the mean ± S.E. of four independent experiments with triplicate dishes. *, p < 0.05 versus control. **, p < 0.05 versus l-threonine alone. The mESCs were pretreated with LY 294002, wortmannin, or Akt inhibitor prior to 24 h incubation with l-threonine and the number of cells was counted using a hemocytometer (G). Values are means ± S.E. of three different experiments, each from triplicate dishes. *, p < 0.05 versus control. **, p < 0.05 versus l-threonine alone.
To examine the involvement of MAPKs signaling in l-threonine-induced mESC proliferation and maintenance of pluripotency, the cells were treated with l-threonine for various time points (0–120 min) and the phosphorylation levels of ERK, p38, and JNK/SAPK were measured. As shown in Fig. 5A, the maximum phosphorylation of ERK, p38, and JNK/SAPK were observed at 15 min, 60 min, and 15 min, respectively, after the addition of l-threonine. In addition, PI3K inhibitors (LY 294002 or wortmannin) or Akt inhibitor pretreatment blocked the l-threonine-induced phosphorylation of ERK, p38, and JNK/SAPK (Fig. 5B). These results suggest that ERK, p38, and JNK/SAPK act as downstream signal molecules of the l-threonine-induced activated PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. Moreover, pretreatment with PD 98059 (ERK inhibitor, 10−5 m), SB 203580 (p38 inhibitor, 10−6 m), or SP 600125 (JNK/SAPK inhibitor, 10−6 m) prior to the addition of 500 μm of l-threonine reduced the l-threonine-induced cyclin D1, cyclin E, c-Myc, and Oct4 expression (Fig. 5, C and D). Furthermore, pretreatment with PD 98059, SB 203580, and SP 600125 blocked l-threonine-induced increase in [3H]thymidine incorporation and total cell numbers (Fig. 5, E and F).
FIGURE 5.
Involvement of MAPKs activation on l-threonine-induced mESC proliferation. Cells were incubated with 500 μm l-threonine after 24 h of depletion of threonine for different time periods (0–180 min). Phosphorylation of ERK, p38, and JNK was detected as described under “Experimental Procedures” (A). The cells were pretreated with LY 294002, wortmannin, or Akt inhibitor for 30 min prior to being treated with l-threonine (500 μm) for 1 h, and then phosphorylation of ERK, p38, and JNK was detected (B). Cells (E14TG2a and R1) were pretreated with PD 98059 (ERK inhibitor, 10−5 m), SB 203580 (p38 inhibitor, 10−6 m), or SP 600125 (JNK inhibitor, 10−6 m) for 30 min prior to being treated with l-threonine (500 μm) for 24 h. Total protein was extracted and blotted with cyclin D1, cyclin E, c-Myc, Oct4, or β-actin antibodies (C and D). Each example shown is representative of three independent experiments. The lower part depicted by bars denotes the mean ± S.E. of four independent experiments with triplicate dishes. *, p < 0.05 versus control. **, p < 0.05 versus l-threonine alone. Cells (E14TG2a and R1) were subsequently pulsed with 1 μCi of [3H]thymidine for 1 h (E). Data represent the mean ± S.E. of four independent experiments with triplicate dishes. *, p < 0.05 versus control. **, p < 0.05 versus l-threonine alone. The mESCs were pretreated with PD 98059, SB 203580, or SP 600125 prior to 24 h incubation with or without 500 μm l-threonine. The number of cells was counted using a hemocytometer (F). Values are means ± S.E. of three different experiments, each from triplicate dishes. *, p < 0.05 versus control. **, p < 0.05 versus l-threonine alone.
Relationship between mTORC1 and mTORC2 in Threonine-induced ESC Proliferation
We examined the phosphorylation of mTOR, raptor, 4E-BP1, p70S6K, and rictor to determine whether the mTORC1 and mTORC2 pathways participated in l-threonine induced mESC proliferation and maintenance of pluripotency. As shown in Fig. 6A, phosphorylation of mTOR, raptor, 4E-BP1, p70S6K, and rictor occurred in a time-dependent manner. To determine the relationship between l-threonine induced PI3K/Akt, MAPKs, and mTOR activation, we examined relationships between the pathways. Cells were pretreated with PI3K/Akt inhibitors or MAPKs inhibitors prior to the addition of 500 μm l-threonine, after which we looked for changes in mTOR, 4E-BP1, and p70S6K phosphorylation. Pretreatment with LY 294002, wortmannin, Akt inhibitor, PD 98059, SB 203580, or SP 600125 prior to 30 min l-threonine addition blocked l-threonine-induced phosphorylation of mTOR, 4E-BP1, and p70S6K (Fig. 6, B and C). To examine whether l-threonine induced mTOR complex formation and activation, cells were pretreated with rapamycin for 10 min or 24 h prior to incubation with l-threonine, and phosphorylation of mTOR, raptor, and rictor analyzed by immunoprecipitation and Western blotting. As determined by immunoprecipitation experiments, raptor and rictor complexed with mTOR, and their phosphorylation levels were increased by threonine treatment. Furthermore, pretreatment with rapamycin for 24 h decreased the phosphorylation levels of mTOR, raptor, and rictor completely, while pretreatment with rapamycin for 10 min partially inhibited rictor phosphorylation (Fig. 6D). These results suggest that the treatment with threonine induced activation of mTORC1 and inactivation of mTORC2 through rictor phosphorylation. In order to examine mTORC1 and mTORC2 in response to l-threonine, immunofluorescence staining of raptor and rictor was performed. Phospho-raptor, a critical component of mTORC1, localization was not affected by l-threonine treatment, but phospho-rictor, a critical component of mTORC2, was translocated from plasma membrane to cytosol/nuclear by treatment with l-threonine, which was blocked by rapamycin pretreatment (Fig. 6E). To examine the role of l-threonine-induced mTOR activity on maintenance of undifferentiated state and differentiation into specific lineage in mES cells, cells were pretreated with rapamycin prior to incubation in presence and absence of l-threonine. l-threonine altered undifferentiation markers (increase in Oct4 and nanog, decrease in Sox2), and decreased trophoectoderm and mesoderm markers, which was blocked by rapamycin treatment. In addition, there had no significant changes in markers expression in rapamycin alone compared with control (Fig. 6F). Furthermore, inhibition of mTOR signaling using rapamycin diminished l-threonine induced c-Myc, Oct4, cyclin D1, and cyclin E expression as well as [3H]thymidine incorporation (Fig. 6, G, H, and I). To confirm the involvement of mTOR signaling on l-threonine-induced mESC proliferation, cells were pretreated with rapamycin prior to 24 h of incubation after the addition of l-threonine. And then, fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACS) analysis and cell number count were performed. Pretreatment with rapamycin significantly blocked the l-threonine-induced increase in the proliferation index and total cell numbers (Fig. 6, J and K). Taken together, these results suggest that l-threonine-induced activation of mTOR signaling plays an important role in l-threonine-induced G1/S phase transition of mESC.
FIGURE 6.
Involvement of mTORC1 and mTORC2 pathway activation on l-threonine-induced mESC proliferation. Cells were treated with 500 μm l-threonine for different time periods (0–120 min). Phosphorylation of mTOR, raptor, p70S6K, 4E-BP1, or rictor was detected by Western blotting (A). Cells were pretreated with LY 294002, wortmannin, Akt inhibitor, PD 98059, SB 203580, or SP 600125 for 30 min prior to being treated with l-threonine (500 μm) for 1 h. Total protein was extracted and subjected to SDS-PAGE and phosphorylation of mTOR, p70S6K, or 4E-BP1 was detected (B and C). Cells were pretreated with rapamycin (mTOR inhibitor, 10−8 m) for 10 min or 24 h prior to 1 h-incubation with l-threonine (500 μm). The total cell lysates and immunoprecipitation of anti-mTOR were analyzed by Western blotting with antibodies that recognize mTOR, phospho-mTOR, phospho-raptor, or phospho-rictor (D). Cells were pretreated with rapamycin for 1 h prior to 1 h of incubation with l-threonine. Phosphor-raptor or -rictor localization was detected by immunostaining (E). After 24 h incubation with l-threonine deprivation media, the cells were pretreated with rapamycin for 1 h prior to being treated with l-threonine (500 μm) for 48 h, and the total RNA was extracted as described under “Experimental Procedures.” The mRNA of the self-renewal marker genes (Oct4, Sox2, and nanog), trophoectoderm marker genes (Cdx2, and FGF4), and mesoderm marker genes (brachyury and MESP1) were detected (F). The cells (E14TG2a and R1) were pretreated with rapamycin for 1 h prior to being treated with l-threonine (500 μm) for 24 h. Total protein was extracted and detected with cyclin D1, CDK4, cyclin E, CDK2, c-Myc, Oct4, or β-actin antibodies (G and H). Each example shown is representative of three independent experiments. The lower part depicted by bars denotes the mean ± S.E. of four independent experiments with triplicate dishes. *, p < 0.05 versus control. **, p < 0.05 versus l-threonine alone. Cells (E14TG2a and R1) were subsequently pulsed with 1 μCi of [3H]thymidine for 1 h (I). Data represented the mean ± S.E. of four independent experiments with triplicate dishes. *, p < 0.05 versus control. **, p < 0.05 versus l-threonine alone. The cells (E14TG2a and R1) were pretreated with rapamycin prior to incubation with l-threonine (500 μm), and then washed with PBS, fixed, stained, and analyzed by flow cytometry (J). Gates were manually configured to determine the percentage of cells in S phase based on DNA content. The data are calculated using the proliferation index [(S + G2/M)/(G0/G1 + S + G2/M)] and reported as the mean ± S.E. of four different experiments, each conducted in triplicate. *, p < 0.05 versus control; **, p < 0.05 versus l-threonine alone. The mESCs were pretreated with rapamycin prior to 24 h incubation with l-threonine, and the number of cells was counted using a hemocytometer (K). Values are means ± S.E. of three different experiments, each from triplicate dishes. *, p < 0.05versus control. **, p < 0.05 versus l-threonine alone.
DISCUSSION
This study demonstrated that l-threonine stimulated ESC proliferation through lipid raft/caveolae-dependent PI3K/Akt, MAPKs, mTOR, p70S6K, and 4E-BP1 signaling pathways (Fig. 7). Recently, it was reported that specific amino acids could affect mESC properties. Deprivation of threonine deteriorates ESC colony growth and the self-renewal (9). In addition, l-proline can induce primitive ectoderm formation in embryos and embryoid bodies (8). These opposing results suggest that individual amino acids can differently regulate ESC proliferation and pluripotency according to the type of cell line and specific amino acid. In the present study, despite a relatively low plasma l-threonine concentration (77 μm), we chose to use 500 μm l-threonine, because it is close to the concentration in conventional mESC cells (798 μm) (20) which is known to exert obvious effects on mESC proliferation. l-threonine depletion significantly decreased ESC proliferation, suggesting that l-threonine, normally contained in culture media in vitro and in plasma in vivo, is closely associated with ESC proliferation. The addition of l-threonine restores and increases DNA synthesis and expression of cyclin D1 and cyclin E, which are rate-limiting activators of G1-to-S phase transition. Among the 20 amino acids, deprivation of l-threonine significantly decreased the number of normal ESC colonies and [3H]thymidine incorporation (9). In addition, l-threonine deprivation altered self-renewal markers and differentiation markers, suggesting that l-threonine plays an important role in maintenance of mESC. Indeed, these results are consistent with a previous report in which incubation of ESCs with culture media lacking threonine decreased alkaline phosphatase activity (9). Amino acid transporters are largely associated with cholesterol-rich lipid raft microdomains of the plasma membrane. This association with lipid rafts is important for transporter trafficking and function (21). Moreover, these have an important role in maintaining self-renewal of mESCs (10, 22). In this context, we investigated the involvement of lipid raft on threonine effects in mESC. In the present study, depletion of membrane cholesterol by MβCD or lipid raft/caveolae disruption using or cav-1 siRNA significantly inhibited l-threonine-induced ESCs proliferation. Although, in this study, we did not identify the specific threonine transporters, our results suggest that lipid raft/caveolae is involved in l-threonine-induced regulation of ESCs proliferation.
FIGURE 7.
The hypothesized model for the signal pathways involved in l-threonine-induced mESC proliferation. l-threonine stimulated PI3K/Akt through putative amino acid transporter which is located in lipid raft/caveolae microdomain of plasma membrane. Subsequently, activated PI3K/Akt signaling stimulated the ERK, p38, and JNK/SAPK MAPKs activation, which induced mTOR and raptor, a component of mTORC1, activation. Activated mTOC1 led to activate the downstream molecules including 4E-BP1, p70S6K, and rictor. l-Threonine-induced activation of mTOC1 and its downstream signal molecules increased expression of c-Myc, which subsequently elicited the Oct4 and cell cycle regulatory proteins expression and exerted proliferative effects on mESC.
The mTOR is known as an evolutionarily conserved nutrient sensor that directs the cellular response to nutrient status, especially with regard to the availability of amino acids (23). The mTOR complex 1 is activated through a canonical signaling cascade triggered by the activation of class I PI3K/Akt (23) and resupplying amino aicds can stimulate p70S6 kinase a downstream molecule of mTOR signaling (24–26). Therefore, we investigate whether addition of l-threonine induces mTOR activation mediated by PI3K/Akt. The addition of l-threonine enhanced Akt phosphorylation at both Thr308 and Ser473phosphorylation sites and inhibition of PI3K/Akt decresased l-threonine-induced proliferation. These results are supported by previous studies that cellular amino acid deprivation reduces insulin-mediated phosphorylation of mTOR Ser2448, which is mediated by Akt (27). In addition, activation of the PI3K/Akt pathway is crucial for inducing cyclin D1 (28). Activation of the PI3K/Akt pathway frequently elicits the activation of other intracellular signaling cascades such as MAPKs (29). In addition, mTOR signaling pathway and downstream molecules such as p70S6K and 4E-BP1 can be stimulated by PI3K/Akt and MAPKs pathways (30, 31). Translational control mediated by PI3K/Akt/mTOR is involved in regulation of mESC proliferation and lineage-restricted differentiation (32). Therefore, we examined the effects of l-threonine on the mTOR pathway through PI3K/Akt, ERK, p38, and JNK-dependent pathways. In the present study, we found that the l-threonine stimulated MAPKs activation, which act as downstream molecules of threonine-induced PI3K/Akt activation in mESC. In addition, inhibition of MAPKs with pharmacologic antagonists reduced l-threonine-induced mESC proliferation.
Amino acids stimulate the phosphorylation of both raptor and rictor, critical components of mTORC1 and mTORC2, respectively (33, 34). Moreover, rictor is directly phosphorylated by S6K1 downstream of mTORC1 and this phosphorylation event exerts a negative regulatory effect on the mTORC2-dependent activation of Akt(Ser473), due to the phosphorylation of the rictor subsequently binding with 14-3-3 and dampening mTORC2 ability to phosphorylate Akt (34). We found that threonine regulates ESC proliferation through fine-tuned regulation of mTORC1 and mTORC2 activation. The phosphorylation of raptor (Ser792) and rictor (Thr1135) was increased by treatment with threonine. In addition, pretreatment with rapamycin decreased the phosphorylation level of raptor or rictor assembled with mTOR. These effects of threonine and rapamycin on mTOR, raptor, or rictor phosphorylation are the same in total lysates, suggesting that the threonine-induced activation of the mTOR pathway works through regulation of phosphorylation levels of complex components rather than complex integrity. Furthermore, we observed that threonine is involved in the regulation of mTORC2 translocation. Threonine and rapamycin treatment did not affect localization of raptor, but pretreatment with rapamycin altered localization of rictor from membrane to cytosol/nuclear. It has been reported that long-term treatment with rapamycin triggers dephosphorylation of mTORC2 and cytoplasmic accumulation of rictor (35). Rictor phosphorylation is an mTORC1-dependent process and inhibition of rictor phosphorylation is not a secondary effect of disrupting the mTORC2 complex (34). Inhibition of mTOR activity using rapamycin blocked the l-threonine-induced maintenance of undifferentiation markers expression. In addition, addition of l-threonine inhibited the differentiation into trophoectoderm and mesoderm of mESC cultured with l-threonine depletion media, which were blocked by rapamycin. In consistent with these results, it has been reported that the increase in levels of Sox2 were led to rapid differentiation of ESC into neuroectoderm, mesoderm, and trophoectoderm, but did not alter the endoderm markers, which suggested that the Oct4 and Sox2 function as molecular rheostats in the control of the self-renewal and pluripotency of ESC (36). Moreover, Zhou et al. (37) reported that the mTOR activity is necessary to support long-term self-renewal and to suppress mesoderm and endoderm activities in hESC. These results suggest that l-threonine-induced mTOR activity play an important role on supporting self-renewal and suppression trophpoectoderm and mesoderm activities in mESC. Furthermore, inhibition of mTOR pathways using pharmacological antagonists blocked l-threonine-induced mESC proliferation, suggesting that l-threonine-induced mTOR activation is critical to the regulation of mESC proliferation. Furthermore, l-threonine stimulated mTOR, which resulted in activation of p70S6K and 4E-BP1. Indeed in ESCs, l-proline induced phosphorylation of both 4E-BP1 and p70S6K, molecules implicated in the initiation of mRNA translation after mTOR activation (8). This activation of mTOR and its downstream molecules was blocked by PI3K inhibitors, Akt inhibitor, or MAPKs inhibitors. Taken together, our observations may support the possible role of threonine as a physiological regulator of the G1-to-S phase transition of ES cells, which will provide valuable tools for modulating ES function and cell fate choice via the addition of small, nontoxic organic molecules. However, although the signal molecules suggested for amino acid regulation of ESC growth provide a rational framework for the available data, many aspects remain entirely speculative, and much additional work is necessary to identify the components and evaluate the relationships proposed. In conclusion, addition of l-threonine following a period of l-threonine deprivation stimulated ESC proliferation through lipid raft/caveolae-dependent PI3K/Akt, MAPKs, and mTORC signaling pathways.
Supplementary Material
This study was supported by National Research Foundation Grant funded by the Korean government (MEST No. 2009-0081395 and No. 2010-0020265), and graduate fellowship of the Brain Korea 21 project provided by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, Republic of Korea.

The on-line version of this article (available at http://www.jbc.org) contains supplemental Table S1 and Figs. S1–S2.
- ESC
- embryonic stem cell
- mTOR
- mammalian target of rapamycin
- mESC
- mouse embryonic stem cell
- CDK
- cyclin-dependent kinase
- mTORC
- mTOR complex
- MAPK
- MAP kinase.
REFERENCES
- 1. Kilberg M. S., Pan Y. X., Chen H., Leung-Pineda V. (2005) Annu. Rev. Nutr. 25, 59–85 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. van Sluijters D. A., Dubbelhuis P. F., Blommaart E. F., Meijer A. J. (2000) Biochem. J. 351, 545–550 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Pantaleon M., Scott J., Kaye P. L. (2008) Biol Reprod. 78, 595–600 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Betz H., Laube B. (2006) J. Neurochem. 97, 1600–1610 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Conigrave A. D., Mun H. C., Brennan S. C. (2007) Biochem. Soc. Trans. 35, 1195–1198 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. He Y., Hakvoort T. B., Vermeulen J. L., Lamers W. H., Van Roon M. A. (2007) Dev. Dyn. 236, 1865–1875 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Gardner D. K. (1998) Theriogenology 49, 83–102 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Washington J. M., Rathjen J., Felquer F., Lonic A., Bettess M. D., Hamra N., Semendric L., Tan B. S., Lake J. A., Keough R. A., Morris M. B., Rathjen P. D. (2010) Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 298, C982–C992 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Wang J., Alexander P., Wu L., Hammer R., Cleaver O., McKnight S. L. (2009) Science 325, 435–439 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Kwak J. O., Kim H. W., Jung S. M., Song J. H., Hong S. B., Oh K. J., Ko C. B., Cha S. H. (2005) J. Nephrol. 18, 681–689 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Schmelzle T., Hall M. N. (2000) Cell 103, 253–262 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Sarbassov D. D., Ali S. M., Sengupta S., Sheen J. H., Hsu P. P., Bagley A. F., Markhard A. L., Sabatini D. M. (2006) Mol. Cell 22, 159–168 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Gangloff Y. G., Mueller M., Dann S. G., Svoboda P., Sticker M., Spetz J. F., Um S. H., Brown E. J., Cereghini S., Thomas G., Kozma S. C. (2004) Mol. Cell. Biol. 24, 9508–9516 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Murray A. W. (2004) Cell 116, 221–234 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Chen X. G., Liu F., Song X. F., Wang Z. H., Dong Z. Q., Hu Z. Q., Lan R. Z., Guan W., Zhou T. G., Xu X. M., Lei H., Ye Z. Q., Peng E. J., Du L. H., Zhuang Q. Y. (2010) Mol. Carcinog. 49, 603–610 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Murakami M., Ichisaka T., Maeda M., Oshiro N., Hara K., Edenhofer F., Kiyama H., Yonezawa K., Yamanaka S. (2004) Mol. Cell. Biol. 24, 6710–6718 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Shan J., Lopez M. C., Baker H. V., Kilberg M. S. (2010) Physiol. Genomics 41, 315–327 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Brett C. M., Washington C. B., Ott R. J., Gutierrez M. M., Giacomini K. M. (1993) Pharm. Res. 10, 423–426 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Bradford M. M. (1976) Anal. Biochem. 72, 248–254 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. O'Kane R. L., Hawkins R. A. (2003) Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 285, E1167–E1173 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Butchbach M. E., Tian G., Guo H., Lin C. L. (2004) J. Biol. Chem. 279, 34388–34396 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Liu X., Mitrovic A. D., Vandenberg R. J. (2009) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 384, 530–534 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Dann S. G., Selvaraj A., Thomas G. (2007) Trends Mol. Med. 13, 252–259 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Wang X., Campbell L. E., Miller C. M., Proud C. G. (1998) Biochem. J. 334, 261–267 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Shigemitsu K., Tsujishita Y., Hara K., Nanahoshi M., Avruch J., Yonezawa K. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 1058–1065 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Iiboshi Y., Papst P. J., Kawasome H., Hosoi H., Abraham R. T., Houghton P. J., Terada N. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 1092–1099 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Navé B. T., Ouwens M., Withers D. J., Alessi D. R., Shepherd P. R. (1999) Biochem. J. 344, 427–431 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Muise-Helmericks R. C., Grimes H. L., Bellacosa A., Malstrom S. E., Tsichlis P. N., Rosen N. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 29864–29872 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Azriel-Tamir H., Sharir H., Schwartz B., Hershfinkel M. (2004) J. Biol. Chem. 279, 51804–51816 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Luo J., Manning B. D., Cantley L. C. (2003) Cancer Cell 4, 257–262 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Wullschleger S., Loewith R., Hall M. N. (2006) Cell 124, 471–484 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Que J., Lian Q., El Oakley R. M., Lim B., Lim S. K. (2007) J. Mol. Signal 2, 9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Kim D. H., Sarbassov D. D., Ali S. M., Latek R. R., Guntur K. V., Erdjument-Bromage H., Tempst P., Sabatini D. M. (2003) Mol. Cell 11, 895–904 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Dibble C. C., Asara J. M., Manning B. D. (2009) Mol. Cell. Biol. 29, 5657–5670 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Rosner M., Hengstschläger M. (2008) Hum. Mol. Genet. 17, 2934–2948 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Kopp J. L., Ormsbee B. D., Desler M., Rizzino A. (2008) Stem Cells 26, 903–911 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Zhou J., Su P., Wang L., Chen J., Zimmermann M., Genbacev O., Afonja O., Horne M. C., Tanaka T., Duan E., Fisher S. J., Liao J., Chen J., Wang F. (2009) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 7840–7845 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.







