Abstract
The esophageal submucosal glands (SMG) secrete HCO3− and mucus into the esophageal lumen, where they contribute to acid clearance and epithelial protection. This study characterized the ion transport mechanisms linked to HCO3− secretion in SMG. We localized ion transporters using immunofluorescence, and we examined their expression by RT-PCR and in situ hybridization. We measured HCO3− secretion by using pH stat and the isolated perfused esophagus. Using double labeling with Na+-K+-ATPase as a marker, we localized Na+-coupled bicarbonate transporter (NBCe1) and Cl−-HCO3− exchanger (SLC4A2/AE2) to the basolateral membrane of duct cells. Expression of cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator channel (CFTR) was confirmed by immunofluorescence, RT-PCR, and in situ hybridization. We identified anion exchanger SLC26A6 at the ducts' luminal membrane and Na+-K+-2Cl− (NKCC1) at the basolateral membrane of mucous and duct cells. pH stat experiments showed that elevations in cAMP induced by forskolin or IBMX increased HCO3− secretion. Genistein, an activator of CFTR, which does not increase intracellular cAMP, also stimulated HCO3− secretion, whereas glibenclamide, a Cl− channel blocker, and bumetanide, a Na+-K+-2Cl− blocker, decreased it. CFTRinh-172, a specific CFTR channel blocker, inhibited basal HCO3− secretion as well as stimulation of HCO3− secretion by IBMX. This is the first report on the presence of CFTR channels in the esophagus. The role of CFTR in manifestations of esophageal disease in cystic fibrosis patients remains to be determined.
Keywords: pH stat, CFTR, Na+-coupled bicarbonate transporter, Cl−-HCO3−, Na+-K+-2Cl−, SLC26A6, cAMP
in humans, esophageal submucosal glands (SMG) secrete HCO3− (and mucin) in amounts sufficient to neutralize residual volumes of acid left in the esophagus after bolus clearance. This HCO3− secretion can approach the HCO3− output of salivary glands at rest (38). Unlike the extensive studies of secretions by salivary glands, stomach, or the duodenum, little is known about the mechanisms of SMG secretions in the esophagus. This is mainly due to the technical difficulties of isolating secretions of the human esophagus from salivary and gastric contamination and the limited availability of healthy esophageal tissue from esophagectomy specimens. We resolved this latter issue by using tissues from specific mammalian species, such as pig and opossum, whose esophagi bear SMG.
Using pH microelectrodes, we previously demonstrated a lumen-to-surface pH gradient in SMG containing esophageal sections. Surface pH increased upon stimulation with carbachol, a cholinergic agonist (1). These data suggest that the lumen-to-surface pH gradient is a dynamic process that can be enhanced under conditions when vagal (cholinergic) activity is high. In another study, we demonstrated that alkali secretion by esophageal SMG is mostly due to HCO3− generation and transport. HCO3− secretion is stimulated by cholinergic agonists and mediated by muscarinic M1 receptors. Secretion of HCO3− is DIDS-sensitive, is inhibited by the removal of serosal Cl−, and is blocked by carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (2).
The esophageal SMG consist of a mix of cell types, mostly mucin-producing cells (3, 5, 27), with some demi-lunes or caps of serous cells, arranged in acinar formation. The SMG secrete HCO3− -rich fluids in a manner that is likely similar to secretory mechanisms of other exocrine glands, such as pancreas and salivary glands. A number of models exist for how these digestive exocrine glands secrete their HCO3−-rich fluids. The secretory products are transported through a system of ducts into the organ's lumen. Secretion is likely produced in two stages: the first step is the formation of an ion-rich acinar fluid derived from blood and the second step is the enrichment of this fluid with HCO3− (39).
In this study, we aimed to identify ion transport mechanisms involved in HCO3− secretion and determine their cellular localization in SMG. We investigated the presence of CFTR, its involvement in the secretion process, and the effect of cAMP on HCO3− secretion in this tissue. We used pig esophagus, which presents several similarities with the human esophagus, including the presence of SMG (19). Our data provide functional and/or immunohistochemical evidence for the presence of Na+-coupled bicarbonate transporter (NBCe1, member of SLC4 family), chloride-bicarbonate exchanger (Cl−-HCO3−, SLC4A2/AE2), Na+-K+-2Cl− (NKCC1), cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator (CFTR; ABCC7) and the anion exchanger SLC26A6 (solute carrier family 26, member 6) in this tissue. The presence and role of CFTR in esophageal SMG may explain, in part, the high incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in cystic fibrosis patients (21, 25, 40).
METHODS
Isolated Esophagus Preparation
Perfusion of isolated pig esophagus in vitro.
Pig esophagi obtained from the slaughterhouse were transferred to the laboratory in ice-cold HEPES Ringer and dissected for cannulation and perfusion as described previously (2).
Measurement of HCO3− secretion.
HCO3− secretion was measured using the pH stat technique as described previously (2). The lumen was perfused with 100 ml of recirculated unbuffered isotonic saline solution (150 mM NaCl, pH adjusted to 7.4 with 0.01 N NaOH and continuously bubbled with CO2-free N2). Bicarbonate secretion, which constitutes most of the alkaline secretion in this tissue (2), was calculated per unit time from the amount of HCl titrant added to the luminal bath to maintain pH 7.4.
Immunofluorescence
Tissues from at least four different animals were used for labeling with each antibody. Tissues were placed in OCT compound (Sakura Finetek, Torrance, CA) and frozen in liquid nitrogen. Cryosections (5-μm thickness) were cut on a Reichert cryostat and mounted on gelatin-coated slides. Sections were fixed for 10 min in 4% methanol-free formaldehyde and rehydrated in PBS immediately prior to staining. Sections were pretreated with 1% SDS for 5 min in PBS to enhance the staining; they were then washed and blocked with serum. The primary and secondary antibodies used in this study are listed in Table 1. Sections were counterstained with the nuclear marker 4′,6-diamino-2-phenylindole, dihydrochloride (DAPI) and mounted in Vectashield (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA). Different concentrations of the primary antibody were used to determine the optimal concentration. For negative controls, primary antibodies were reacted with their respective fusion protein prior to staining or, alternatively, sections were incubated without the primary antibody. Micrographs were obtained using a Nikon Eclipse 80i microscope and a Spot RT digital camera or a Leica DMIRE2 confocal microscope.
Table 1.
Primary antibodies, concentrations used, homology of immunogen to pig protein, secondary antibodies, and relative labeling intensity in different cells of the SMGs
Immunolocalization in SMG |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Host/Antibody | Immunogen/Clone, Source | Homology to Pig Protein % | Concentrat-ion Used | Secondary Antibodies Alexa Fluor (Invitrogen) | Duct Cells | Mucous Cells | Serous Cells |
rkNBC | rkNBC, MBP-K1A, COOH-terminal portion, last 46 residues, (gift from Dr.W.F. Boron) | 94 | 1/200 | Goat anti-rabbit 488 (green fluorescence) | +++ | + | +++ |
Rabbit polyclonal | |||||||
AE2 | Mouse SA6 peptide-COOH-terminal, aa 1224–1237, (gift from Dr. S. Alper) | 93 | 1 μg/ml | Goat anti-rabbit 488 | +++ | + | + |
Rabbit polyclonal | |||||||
Na+-K+-ATPase | Sheep Na+-K+-ATPase, clone M8-P1-A3, (ABR, Boulder, CO) | 98 | 1/100 | Goat anti-mouse 568 (red fluorescence) | +++ | +++ | +++ |
Mouse monoclonal | |||||||
Na+-K+-2Cl | Human, T4 (Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, U. of Iowa, Dept of Biological Sciences) | Not available | 10 μg/ml | Goat anti-mouse 568 | +++ | +++ | ++ |
Mouse monoclonal | |||||||
CFTR | NH2 terminus 24–35, human clone MM13-4, MAB3482 (Chemicon, Billerica, MA) | 100 | 5 μg/ml | Goat anti-mouse 568 | ++ | ++ | + |
Mouse monoclonal | |||||||
CFTR | Peptide corresponding to aa 1468–1480 of human CFTR, (accession no. P13569), Alomone Labs or Chemicon 3555 | 92 | 8 μg/ml | Goat anti-rabbit 488 | +++ | +++ | ++ |
Rabbit polyclonal | |||||||
CFTR | NH2 terminus of human CFTR, (N20, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) | ∼90 | 5 μg/ml | Donkey anti-goat 488 | + | + | + |
Goat polyclonal | |||||||
CFTR | Human, NH2 terminus aa 1–182 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) | 95 | 2 μg/ml | Goat anti-rabbit 488 | + | + | + |
Rabbit polyclonal | |||||||
SLC26A3 | SLC26A3 (NP_000102, aa 503–601) partial recombinant with GST tag, (Abnova, Taipei, Taiwan) | 88 | 10 μg/ml | Goat anti-mouse 568 | _ | _ | _ |
Mouse monoclonal | |||||||
SLC26A6 | SLC26A6 (NP_075062, aa 666–739) partial recombinant with GST tag, (Abnova) | 96 | 1/100 | Goat anti-mouse 568 | +++ | + | + |
Mouse polyclonal |
SMG, submucosal glands; rkNBC, rat kidney Na-coupled bicarbonate transporter; MBP-K1A, fusion protein; AE2, anion exchanger 2; CFTR, cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator; GST, glutathione S-transferase.
Total RNA Isolation, Reverse Transcription, and Amplification of mRNA
Porcine SMG were resected under a magnification of ×60 from the cephalic and middle area of the esophagus where the glands abound and were frozen in liquid nitrogen. Frozen tissues were homogenized, and total RNA was isolated using the Ultraspec-II RNA Isolation System (Biotecx, Houston, TX) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Detection of expected 18S and 28S ribosomal RNA on a denaturing agarose gel was used to determine the quality of purified total RNA, and a porcine β-2-microglobulin mRNA-specific RT-PCR was performed (not shown).
Primers were obtained from Integrated DNA Technologies (Coralville, IA). The primers for CFTR were: 5′-GAGGACAGTTGTTGGCAGTT-3′ and 5′-TTGGCACGCTTTGATGAC-3′; for SLC26A6: 5′-GGAGAGCACCGGGGGCAACACA-3′ and 5′-TGAGGCGGTCCACATCCACAC-3′; and for NBCe1-B: 5′-GAATGGGGACACGCCCCACG-3′ and 5′-AGCTGGCATCGGTGGCAACC-3′. Reverse transcription and amplification of target sequences was performed using SuperScript III One-Step RT-PCR System for end point detection (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) according to the manufacturer's instruction. RT-PCR products were resolved by electrophoresis using a 1.5% agarose gel containing 10 μg/ml ethidium bromide. The approximate size of each product was determined by comparison to a DNA ladder (Invitrogen). PCR products were purified and sequenced using an ABI Prism 3130xl sequencer to confirm gene identity (Tulane Medical Center Core Facility).
In Situ Hybridization
Synthetic oligonucleotides (∼36 bp) labeled with fluorescein, corresponding to the tandem repeat sequences of CFTR (Sus scrofa NM_001104950.1) were used. The anti-sense sequence was 5′-AAGTGACGCTGCTGATGGGGCTGCTGTGGGAGTTGT-3′. The sense sequence was used as a negative control and a fluorescein-tagged poly(dT) oligonucleotide was used as a positive control. Tissues were fixed in 10% phosphate buffered formalin and embedded in paraffin. Sections (10 μm) were dried overnight at 56°C, deparaffinized, rehydrated in a series of alcohols, and treated with RNAase inhibitor (Protect RNA; Sigma, St. Louis). Proteinase K digestion (7 μg/ml in 0.02 M Tris·HCl, pH 7.5) was performed for 15 min at 37°C. Samples were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min and treated with 0.1 M triethanolamine, pH 8, and 0.5% acetic anhydride for 10 min. After prehybridization in 4× SSC (standard saline citrate) buffer, sections were hybridized overnight at 65°C with fluorescein-labeled oligonucleotides (200 ng/ml) diluted in 4× SSC, 10% dextran sulfate, 2× Denhardt's, 50% formamide, and tRNA (250 μg/ml) [poly(dT) slides were hybridized at room temperature]. Post-hybridization washes were performed at 37°C [poly(dT) slides were washed at room temperature] stepwise from 4× SSC to a final wash with 0.1× SSC. Sections were then blocked using in situ hybridization (ISH) blocking solution (Vector Laboratories) and stained with alkaline phosphatase anti-fluorescein antibody (Vector Laboratories). Alkaline phosphatase was developed using 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate/nitroblue tetrazolium in 100 mM Tris·HCl, pH 9.5 with levamisole added to block endogenous alkaline phosphatase (Vector) pH 9.5. Slides were counterstained with Nuclear Fast Red and mounted in Vectamount.
Solutions
The composition of Ringer solutions is in mM: 140 Na+, 119.8 Cl−, 5.2 K+, 25 HCO3−, 1.2 Ca2+, 1.2 Mg2+, 2.4 HPO42−, 0.4 H2PO4−, 10 glucose (osmolality, 290 mosmol/kgH2O, pH 7.4 when gassed with 95% O2-5% CO2 at 37°C). Chemicals were obtained from Sigma. CFTRinh-172, IBMX, forskolin, bumetanide, genistein, or glibenclamide were dissolved in a small volume of dimethyl sulfoxide and added to the solution. The concentration of DMSO never exceeded 0.2% of the final solution. To test whether DMSO had any effect on the results, HCO3− secretion was measured in three different tissues, (0.12 ± 0.04 μeq/h·cm2), the addition of DMSO at a concentration of 0.2% did not alter basal HCO3− secretion, which stayed at 0.13 ± 0.03 μeq/h·cm2 (P > 0.3).
Statistical Analysis
Data are presented as means ± SE. Data were analyzed using two-tailed paired Student's t-test unless otherwise indicated (n is the number of experiments).
RESULTS
Immunolocalization of NBCe1 and Na+-K+-ATPase
We double-labeled cryosections of esophageal tissue with NBCe1 (rat kidney NBC) antibody and an antibody to the α-subunit of the Na+-K+-ATPase, protein located at the basolateral membrane of the majority of epithelial cells. The antibody to NBC we used recognizes the COOH-terminal portion (last 46 residues) of several NBC isoforms including rat kidney and pancreas NBC. We used two different fluorescent secondary antibodies to study the colocalization of the two transporters in the same tissue.
The interlobular duct cells of SMG stained intensely with the antibody to Na+-K+-ATPase (red), and the staining clearly delineated the basolateral membrane (Fig. 1A). Similarly, the staining with the NBCe1 antibody (green) was prominent on the basolateral cell membrane of the duct cells (Fig. 1B). Figure 1D shows the overlap between the two antibodies as well as the nuclei counterstained blue with DAPI (Fig. 1C). Similarly, the intralobular duct cells showed an identical pattern of staining when the same antibodies and nuclear stain were used (data not shown).
Fig. 1.
Confocal immunofluorescence micrographs showing localization of Na+-coupled bicarbonate transporter (NBCe1) and Na+-K+-ATPase in submucosal glands (SMG). A: Na+-K+-ATPase staining (red) was intense and delineated the basolateral (bl) membrane of duct cells. B: NBCe1 staining (green) was positive in the basolateral membrane. C: nuclei were counterstained with 4′,6-diamino-2-phenylindole, dihydrochloride (DAPI). D: merge of A, B, and C show colocalization of NBCe1 and Na+-K+-ATPase. Bar = 50 μm.
In the serous cells or demi-lunes, the staining to Na+-K+-ATPase (Fig. 2A) and NBC (Fig. 2B) was intense without showing any polar distribution. Figure 2C shows the nuclei counterstained blue with DAPI. The overlap between the staining with the antibodies to Na+-K+-ATPase and NBCe1 was clearly evident in the serous cells (yellow) when Figs. 2, A–C were merged (Fig. 2D). In mucous (acinar) cells, the staining with Na+-K+-ATPase and NBCe1 antibodies was positive and clearly delineated the basolateral membrane (Figs. 2, A and B). In all sections, when the primary antibody was omitted or reacted with the fusion protein (MBP-K1A at 15 μg/ml) prior to its application to the tissue, the labeling was abolished (see Supplemental Fig. S1 posted with the online version of this article).
Fig. 2.
Immunofluorescence localization of NBCe1 and Na+-K+-ATPase in SMG acini. A: Na+-K+-ATPase staining (red) was intense in serous (s) demi-lunes and the basolateral membrane of the mucous cells (m). B: NBCe1 staining (green) was positive in the serous demi-lunes and the basolateral membrane of mucous cells. C: nuclei were counterstained blue with DAPI. D: NBCe1 and Na+-K+-ATPase stainings colocalized (yellow) when A, B, and C were merged. Bar = 10 μm. E: Shows amplification of NBCe1-B product from mRNA isolated from SMG tissue, at the expected product size of ∼479 bp (lane 2). DNA ladder is shown in lane 1.
Identification of NBC by RT-PCR
We further confirmed the presence of NBC by RT-PCR. Using coding sequence primers for NBCe1-B, RT-PCR amplification of mRNA extracted from SMG tissue showed a positive band at the expected product size of ∼479 bp as shown in Fig. 2E, lane 2. The sequence of the PCR product is shown in the online Supplementary Material. A BLAST of this sequence showed 99% homology to SLC4A4 (Sus scrofa, NM_001030533.1) (NBCe1-B) (16).
Immunolocalization of AE2 and Na+-K+-ATPase
To localize the Cl−-HCO3− transporter (SLC4A2/AE2) in SMG cells, we performed double-labeling immunofluorescence experiments with an antibody to AE2 (COOH terminus CT) and an antibody to the α-subunit of Na+-K+-ATPase. In the intralobular duct cells, the staining to Na+-K+-ATPase was intensely positive (red) in the basolateral membrane (Fig. 3A). The staining with AE2CT antibody was also positive in the basolateral cell membrane (green, Fig. 3B). The tissues were counterstained with DAPI (Fig. 3C). There was complete overlap between the staining with AE2CT and Na+-K+-ATPase, evident as yellow stain in the merged Fig. 3D. The staining with Na+-K+-ATPase and AE2CT antibodies showed a similar distribution in interlobular duct cells. Mucous and serous cells of the acini stained strongly positive to Na+-K+-ATPase antibody, while the staining to AE2CT antibody was positive in serous cells and faint in mucous cells (data not shown).
Fig. 3.
Immunofluorescence localization of the Cl−-HCO3− exchanger AE2CT (SLC4A2) and Na+-K+-ATPase in intralobular ducts of SMG. A: Na+-K+-ATPase staining (red) was intense and delineated the basolateral membrane of duct cells. B: AE2CT staining (green) was positive at the basolateral membrane only. C: nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. D: AE2CT and Na+-K+-ATPase stainings colocalized (yellow) when A, B, and C were merged. Bar = 10 μm.
To check the specificity of the labeling to AE2, we performed an experiment in which the antibody to AE2CT was reacted with the fusion protein SA6 and applied to the tissue. Reacting with the fusion protein SA6 completely abolished the staining for AE2 (see Supplemental Fig. S2).
Immunolocalization of CFTR
We labeled cryosections of esophageal tissue with a panel of four different antibodies to CFTR as listed in Table 1. All antibodies showed positive staining in the acini and interlobular and intralobular ducts of the SMG. The labeling with CFTR antibody raised against the COOH terminus of the protein (peptide corresponding to amino acids 1468–1480 of human CFTR) gave the best results and is shown in Fig. 4. Figure 4A showed intense labeling of Na+-K+-ATPase (red) in mucous (acinar) cells and duct cells as observed earlier. In mucous cells (Fig. 4B) the staining for CFTR was positive (green) but did not localize to a specific cell membrane. However, CFTR staining was more defined in the cell membranes of duct cells (Fig. 4B). Colocalization with Na+-K+-ATPase (merged image, Fig. 4D) clearly indicates that in the duct cells immediately adjacent to the lumen the staining was mostly present on the luminal membrane (labeled “l” in Fig. 4D). In the basal layers of duct cells there was some colocalization with Na+-K+-ATPase staining (yellow, Fig. 4D). Figure 4C shows nuclear staining with DAPI. In experiments where the primary antibody was reacted with the fusion protein no staining to CFTR was observed (negative control, see Supplemental Fig. S3). Labeling with another CFTR antibody raised against the NH2 terminus (amino acids 24–35, human clone MM13–4) showed a similar distribution and is shown in Supplemental Fig. S4. The labeling with an antibody against the NH2 terminus of human CFTR (N-20) and another one against human NH2 terminus (amino acid 1–182) was also positive, but the intensity was less pronounced (data not shown).
Fig. 4.
Confocal micrographs showing immunofluorescence localization of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) and Na+-K+-ATPase in SMG. A: duct cells showed intense staining for Na+-K+-ATPase at the basolateral membrane of the cells. B: CFTR staining was positive and diffuse in the acini but was clearly delineating the luminal (l) membrane of duct cells lining the lumen. C: nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. D: merged image shows that staining to CFTR was clearly positive at the luminal membrane of duct cells. Bar = 10 μm.
CFTR mRNA Detection by ISH and RT-PCR
ISH was performed using fluorescein-tagged oligonucleotide probes. Positive ISH signals (blue stain) were observed in the sections incubated with the antisense nucleotide probe to mRNA of CFTR, as shown in Fig. 5A. The sections incubated with the sense probe (Fig. 5B) or without any probe (Fig. 5D) did not show ISH signals. The sections incubated with poly(dT), as a positive probe for RNA, showed strong positive staining (Fig. 5C).
Fig. 5.
In situ hybridization (ISH) and RT-PCR amplification of CFTR in esophageal tissues. A: positive ISH signals (blue staining; arrows) in paraffin sections incubated with the anti-sense nucleotide probe to mRNA of CFTR. Sections incubated with the sense probe (B) or without any probe (D) did not show ISH signals. C: sections incubated with poly(dT), as a positive probe for RNA, showed strong positive staining. Nuclei were counterstained with Nuclear Fast Red. E: RT-PCR amplification of CFTR product from mRNA isolated from esophageal SMG (lane 1) or trachea (lane 2) used as a positive control. The expected product size was obtained in both cases.
To further determine the presence of mRNA coding for CFTR we performed RT-PCR on glandular tissues. Using gene-specific primers, RT-PCR amplification of mRNA extracted from dissected SMG tissue showed a positive band at the expected product size of ∼229 bp (Fig. 5E, lane 1). Lane 2 showed a similar band with RNA extracted from trachea and used as a positive control. The sequence of the PCR product obtained from esophageal SMG is shown in the online Supplementary Material. A BLAST of this sequence shows 95% homology to Sus scrofa CFTR (NM_0011049950.1, ATP binding cassette subfamily member 7).
Role of CFTR in HCO3− Secretion
To study the role of CFTR in SMG secretion, we measured esophageal HCO3− secretion in response to different agents that affect the activity of CFTR channels. HCO3− secretion was measured in the isolated perfused esophagus using a recirculated unbuffered luminal solution connected to a pH stat system. Following mounting and equilibration, basal (unstimulated) HCO3− secretion was recorded every 10 min and was averaged over the course of 60 min. Basal HCO3− secretion from 30 tissues averaged 0.10 ± 0.016 μeq/h·cm2. Specific agents and/or agonists were then added to the serosal bath, and the measurements were repeated and averaged over the next 60 min so that each tissue served as its own control. HCO3− secretion in the presence of agonists or inhibitors was normalized (%) to the basal secretion for that condition expressed as 100%.
Effect of stimulation of CFTR.
We used IBMX (100 μM), a phosphodiesterase inhibitor that increases cAMP levels in the cell and is a known activator of CFTR. As shown in Fig. 6A, the addition of IBMX to the serosal bath of the isolated perfused esophagus increased HCO3− secretion by 57 ± 7% (n = 6, P < 0.01).
Fig. 6.
Effects of IBMX, forskolin, and genistein on esophageal HCO3− secretion. A: 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (IBMX), a phosphodiesterase inhibitor, increased HCO3− secretion significantly (n = 6, P < 0.01). B: forskolin, an adenylyl cyclase activator, more than doubled HCO3− secretion (n = 6, P < 0.001). C: genistein an isoflavone phytoestrogen and a potentiator of CFTR increased HCO3− secretion significantly (n = 7, P < 0.005). *Significance compared with basal secretion.
We also investigated the effect of forskolin, an adenylyl cyclase activator and another activator of CFTR. As shown in Fig. 6B, when forskolin (10 μM) was added to the serosal bath, HCO3− secretion increased by 166 ± 23% (n = 6, P < 0.01) over the course of 60 min.
Activation by genistein.
Genistein, an isoflavone phytoestrogen and a tyrosine protein kinase inhibitor, has been reported to bind directly to CFTR channels to activate them without affecting cAMP (28). Genistein (20 μM) added to the bath increased HCO3− secretion by 225 ± 100% (Fig. 6C) over the course of 60 min (n = 7, P < 0.005).
Effect of Inhibition of CFTR.
Glibenclamide is a sulfonylurea cell-permeable compound (53) that blocks CFTR channels (10, 46, 56). As shown in Fig. 7A, the addition of glibenclamide to the bath of the isolated perfused esophagi resulted in a reduction of basal HCO3− secretion by ∼47 ± 23% over the course of 60 min (n = 6, P < 0.05).
Fig. 7.
Effects of glibenclamide and CFTRinh-172 on esophageal HCO3− secretion. A: glibenclamide, a Cl− channel (CFTR) blocker, inhibited basal HCO3− secretion significantly (n = 6, P < 0.05). B: CFTRinh-172 inhibited basal HCO3− secretion significantly and inhibited stimulation of secretion by IBMX. *Significance compared with basal secretion.
Last we used CFTRinh-172, a thiazolidinone derivative reported to inhibit CFTR channels (34). CFTRinh-172 is membrane permeable and has been shown to inhibit submucosal gland secretions in whole tissue preparations of pig bronchi (51). Addition of CFTRinh-172 (10 μM) to the basolateral side of the tissue inhibited basal secretion of HCO3− by ∼63% (n = 4, P < 0.05) over the course of 60 min. Subsequent addition of IBMX to the bath in the continued presence of CFTRinh-172 did not elicit any stimulation of HCO3− (n = 4, P > 0.05). These data are summarized in Fig. 7B.
Immunolocalization of SLC26A6 and SLC26A3
In the pancreas and other tissues, CFTR is reported to interact with members of the SLC26 family of anion exchangers to regulate HCO3− secretion into the lumen (31, 49). To investigate the presence of these transporters in the SMG and their coexpression with CFTR we labeled cryosections of esophageal tissue with an antibody to SLC26A6 or to SLC26A3. The staining with SLC26A3 antibody was negative in the glands. On the other hand, the staining with SLC26A6 antibody was positive and clearly delineated the luminal membrane of the ducts (Fig. 8, A and C). Figure 8B shows nuclear labeling with DAPI. This finding is consistent with the presence of SLC26A6 at the luminal membrane of those cells. SLC26A6 staining was positive but diffuse in the acinar mucous cells (data not shown).
Fig. 8.
Immunofluorescence localization and RT-PCR amplification of the luminal anion exchanger SLC26A6 in SMG. A: staining of SLC26A6 (red) was positive at the luminal membrane. B: nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. C: merged image showing expression of the anion exchanger at the apical membrane of an interlobular duct. D: SLC26A6 expression was confirmed by RT-PCR using mRNA isolated from dissected SMG (lane 1) and trachea (lane 2) as positive control. The 494-bp band was the predicted product size.
Identification of SLC26A6 by RT-PCR
Expression of SLC26A6 was also confirmed in the SMG tissue by RT-PCR. As shown in Fig. 8D, amplification using primers for Sus scrofa SLC26A6 yielded a predicted 494 base pairs product in SMG (lane 1). A similar band was observed in trachea (lane 2) used as a positive control. The sequence of the PCR product thus obtained from SMG is shown online in Supplementary Material. A BLAST of this sequence shows 99% homology to Sus scrofa anion exchanger SLC26A6 (NM_001012298.1).
Immunolocalization of Na+-K+-2Cl−
Na+-K+-2Cl− cotransporter (NKCC1) is reported to play a major role in glandular secretion via the ability to mediate influx of Cl−, K+, and Na+ into the cell. (33). We used an antibody to NKCC1 to immunolocalize the transporter in SMG tissue. Staining with this antibody showed intense labeling of the mucous cells, clearly delineating the basolateral membrane (Fig. 9, A and B). In the duct cells, the basolateral membrane also stained positive to the antibody, indicating the presence of the transporter at this membrane (Fig. 9, C and D). The nuclei are stained blue with DAPI (Fig. 9, B and D).
Fig. 9.
Immunofluorescence localization of Na+-K+-2Cl− in the SMG using a mouse monoclonal antibody. In mucous cells, A shows intense staining (red) for Na+-K+-2Cl− and B is a merged image of an acinus showing Na+-K+-2Cl− and nuclei, counterstained blue with DAPI. These images indicate that Na+-K+-2Cl− clearly delineated the basolateral membrane. In duct cells, C shows the localization of Na+-K+-2Cl− (red) in interlobular duct cells of SMG, and D is the merged image of a duct showing Na+-K+-2Cl− and nuclei stained blue with DAPI. The images indicate that Na+-K+-2Cl− staining (red) was intense and clearly delineated the basolateral membrane. Bar = 5 μm. E: bumetanide, an Na+-K+-2Cl−blocker, decreased HCO3− secretion significantly (n = 3, P < 0.005). *Significance compared with basal secretion.
Role of Na+-K+-2Cl− in HCO3− Secretion
We last demonstrated the role of Na+-K+-2Cl− in esophageal SMG secretion. To do so, we measured HCO3− secretion in the absence and presence of bumetanide (0.1 mM), a known inhibitor of this transporter, in the isolated perfused esophagus. As shown in Fig. 9E, the addition of bumetanide to the serosal bath decreased HCO3− secretion by ∼37 ± 14% (n = 3, P < 0.005).
DISCUSSION
Like the human esophagus, the pig esophagus bears SMG that are capable of secreting significant amounts of mucus and HCO3− into the esophageal lumen. The secreted mucus and HCO3− contribute to the formation of a buffered unstirred surface layer that protects the esophagus from damage caused by acidic exposure (1). In a previous study, we showed that HCO3− secretion by esophageal SMG is stimulated by cholinergic agonists and inhibited by DIDS, the removal of Cl−, and carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (2). In the present study, we characterized the cellular mechanisms involved in this process and localized the transporters that are likely involved in HCO3− secretion. Figure 10 is a schematic diagram of an epithelial duct cell of the esophageal SMG showing apical and basolateral transporters linked to HCO3− secretion for which we have obtained histological and/or functional data in our study.
Fig. 10.
Cell model of a duct cell depicting ion transport mechanisms involved in HCO3− secretion in esophageal SMG. Basolateral HCO3− entry is mediated by Na+-(HCO3−)n cotransporter (NBCe1). The anion exchanger Cl−-HCO3− (AE2) mediates Cl− uptake by the cell and could play a role in intracellular pH regulation. Basolateral Na+-K+-2Cl− (NKCC1) mediates Na+, K+, and Cl− entry into the cell. HCO3− efflux at the apical membrane is mediated by SLC26A6. Apical CFTR may serve as a channel that is permeable to HCO3− and therefore can contribute directly to HCO3− secretion. Alternatively, CFTR may serve predominantly as a channel for apical Cl− efflux, a fraction of which may be shunted to drive apical Cl−-HCO3− exchanger (SLC26A6) leading to HCO3− secretion. This model is based on data from this study and a previous study from our lab (2) where the role of different transport inhibitors, including carbonic anhydrase inhibitors on HCO3− secretion was evaluated.
NBC and AE2
NBC staining in SMG ducts overlapped with Na+-K+-ATPase staining, indicating the presence of Na+-(HCO3−)n cotransporter (NBCe1) on the basolateral side of duct cells. The staining pattern of NBC in the SMG (Figs. 1 and 2), positive in the ducts and weak in the acini, is similar to the pattern in the pancreas (35). The antibody we used was raised against the terminal 46 aa of rat kidney NBC (45) and can recognize the variants NBCe1-A (kidney proximal tubule) and NBCe1-B (pancreatic NBC). Using primers to Sus scrofa NBCe1-B, we obtained a 479-bp PCR product that had 99% homology to NBCe1-B. At the molecular level, the full sequence of this NBC isoform of the esophagus has not yet been cloned. Further experiments are needed to determine the homology between the esophageal isoform(s) of NBC and the kidney, pancreas, and brain isoforms. The presence of NBC in serous and duct cells indicates that those cells are the likely source of HCO3− secreted by esophageal SMG. To generate HCO3− in the duct lumen, basolateral NBC must bring Na+ and HCO3− from the blood side into the cell. NBC isoforms leading to influx (rather than efflux) of Na+ and HCO3− should have a configuration of (HCO3−/Na+) of 2:1 or 1:1. Such an NBC has been reported in other secretory epithelia (4, 44).
Double immunostaining with AE2CT and Na+-K+-ATPase antibodies localized AE2 to the basolateral side of duct cells only (Fig. 3). This is consistent with findings in other glandular and epithelial tissues where AE2 is also restricted to the basolateral membrane of the cells (7). Because the electrochemical gradients always favor Cl− entry into the cell, this exchanger allows the influx of Cl− and the efflux of HCO3−. It cannot, therefore, contribute directly to HCO3− uptake from the blood side for secretion into the lumen. However, the role of AE2 in the secretory process remains significant for at least two reasons. First, a likely role of AE2 is to regulate intracellular pH (pHi). The presence of the transporter (albeit faint) in mucous cells, as well as in serous and duct cells, suggests a ubiquitous role as needed for pHi regulation. A second role of AE2, and probably a more significant one, is to contribute to the transcellular transport of Cl− ions. We have previously demonstrated that the presence of Cl− on the basolateral side of the tissue is critical for HCO3− secretion (2).
Na+-K+-2Cl−
Our immunostaining experiments indicate the presence of Na+-K+-2Cl− (NKCC1) at the basolateral membrane of mucous and duct cells, a finding consistent with the distribution of this transporter in other exocrine glands (22, 32). Our functional data in the isolated perfused esophagus indicate that the addition of bumetanide, an inhibitor of Na+-K+-2Cl− transporter, to the basolateral side of the tissue decreases HCO3− secretion significantly. This observation, and the fact that HCO3− secretion in this tissue is dependant on serosal Cl− (2), suggests that Cl− entry across the basolateral membrane is a necessary step for HCO3− secretion. The residual basal secretion in the presence of bumetanide is due either to incomplete inhibition of Na+-K+-2Cl−, or to the presence of other Cl− transport mechanisms on the basolateral membrane, such as AE2, that can compensate for reduced Cl− influx by Na+-K+-2Cl−.
CFTR
A novel finding of our study is demonstrating that CFTR is localized in the esophageal SMG and that it likely contributes to mediating HCO3− secretion by these glands. In several glandular tissues, CFTR can act either as a Cl− channel or as a channel capable of transporting HCO3− (41). CFTR is reported to play a major role in HCO3− secretion in tracheobronchial glands (9, 18) and pancreas (24). CFTR channel activity can also serve as a mediator for activation of Cl−-HCO3− exchange (31, 48). The activation of this channel by the cAMP transduction pathway is one of its identifying properties (47).
We used four different antibodies to immunolocalize CFTR. Two antibodies gave the best results: 1) a polyclonal antibody against peptide corresponding to amino acids 1468–1480 of human CFTR (Fig. 4), 2) a monoclonal antibody against NH2 terminus amino acids 24–35 (see Supplemental Fig. S3). The distribution of CFTR, diffuse in mucous cells and more localized to the luminal membrane in the ducts, is in agreement with its distribution in salivary glands and pancreas (56). CFTR was prominently expressed in apical membrane of cells immediately lining the ducts. Interestingly, some basolateral labeling of CFTR was observed in basal cells of the ducts (cells not directly lining the lumen). The presence of CFTR in the basolateral membrane of glandular duct cells has been observed in other glandular tissues (42). Because immunolabeling of CFTR has been an issue of controversy in some studies (17, 37), we further tested the presence of CFTR by RT-PCR. Using gene-specific primers we confirmed the presence of CFTR product in isolated SMG. Finally, we used ISH as a third approach to verify the presence of CFTR in SMG. As shown in Fig. 5, CFTR transcript was positively labeled in SMG tissues.
Functionally, there is no ideal way to selectively activate CFTR. However, one hallmark of CFTR activation is an increase in cAMP. In our experiments the increase in intracellular cAMP caused by forskolin, an adenylyl cyclase activator, or IBMX, a phosphodiesterase inhibitor, caused a large increase in basal HCO3− secretion. However, the elevation in intracellular cAMP could activate other ion transport mechanisms, among which are K+ channels, Na+-K+-2Cl−, and Na+-(HCO3−)n (8). To confirm that the increase in HCO3− secretion was indeed due to CFTR stimulation and not to secondary effects of cAMP, we used genistein, a flavonoid that is a potent activator of CFTR channels (6, 23, 29, 36). Genistein does not operate through activation of PKA, PKC, or PKG because it does not cause increases in cAMP, Ca2+, or cGMP (11). Our experiments indicate that the activation of the CFTR channel by genistein caused an increase in HCO3− secretion. Our findings were further supported by the use of glibenclamide, an inhibitor of CFTR (46), which decreased HCO3− secretion. In another set of experiments on the isolated perfused esophagus, we used another specific CFTR channel blocker, CFTRinh-172 to block CFTR (34), and we demonstrated that basal as well as IBMX-induced HCO3− secretion were significantly inhibited.
The presence of CFTR in the esophagus has been questioned by few studies. In human fetal tissue CFTR expression was reported in most of the gastrointestinal tract but was absent in the esophagus (52). However, it is not clear whether expression by ISH was done on esophageal tissues containing SMG. Rochelle et al. (43) did not detect CFTR expression in murine esophagus, but it is known that murine esophagus is devoid of SMG, which our studies indicate are the primary location of CFTR expression in the esophagus. In a third study, published as an abstract, Joo et al. (30) reported pharmacological results on mucus secretion by porcine SMG consistent with our findings on HCO3− secretion but could not detect CFTR expression by PCR. However, our data confirmed CFTR presence in SMG by ISH, PCR, and immunolabeling in addition to the contribution of CFTR to a physiologic response measured as HCO3− secretion.
Our studies explain important characteristics of the cellular transport pathways involved in HCO3− secretion in SMG. These properties are derived from the functional and immunohistochemical data of this study and our previous studies on HCO3− secretion in the glands (2). Figure 10 is a schematic diagram of a SMG duct cell presenting a likely model of HCO3− secretion by these glands. Similar to the salivary glands (55), the acini possibly secrete a plasma-derived fluid that is then modified and enriched with HCO3− in the duct system. As shown in Fig. 10, the basolateral entry step for HCO3− seems to be predominantly mediated by NBCe1-B. Basolateral Cl−-HCO3− (AE2) identified in this study, does not contribute directly to HCO3− secretion but may be significant for intracellular pH regulation and Cl- transport. The luminal HCO3− exit step is likely mediated by Cl−-HCO3− exchanger SLC26A6. We have established a critical role of Cl− in HCO3− secretion with CFTR and basolateral Na+-K+-2Cl− contributing to this process. Apical CFTR may have dual roles in HCO3− secretion. On one hand, CFTR may serve as a channel that is permeable to HCO3− and therefore can contribute directly to HCO3− secretion (41, 50). Alternatively, CFTR may serve predominantly as a channel for apical Cl− efflux, a fraction of which may be shunted to drive apical Cl−-HCO3− exchanger (SLC26A6) leading to HCO3− secretion. The mode of regulation of these transporters and their relative contribution to HCO3− secretion in the SMG remain to be determined.
In human esophagus the expression of CFTR is yet to be determined. However, several observations indicate that a role of CFTR in the esophagus is likely. A great majority of CF patients have GERD; ∼25% in infants and ∼80% in adults (20, 54). In CF patients, proximal esophageal acid exposure is significantly higher than control with more frequent and longer episodes (14, 15, 54). Using impedance-pH monitoring and esophageal manometry in children and adult CF patients, two recent studies by Blondeau et al. (12, 13) suggest that GERD is a primary phenomenon and it is not secondary to cough. Heine et al. (26) demonstrated that GERD in infants was present before radiological lung disease was established. Accordingly, it is possible that impaired HCO3− and mucus secretions from the esophageal glands, caused by defective Cl− channels, might be a factor contributing to the epithelial damage in the esophagus.
Perspectives and Significance
The esophageal SMG are well positioned anatomically and functionally to play an important role in the defense of the esophagus against acid injury. Mechanisms that mediate and regulate esophageal SMG secretions remain largely unknown. Characterizing these mechanisms is important to understand the physiology and pathophysiology of the esophagus. Our study investigated the ion transport mechanisms involved in SMG bicarbonate secretion. We have immunolocalized several HCO3− and Cl− transport mechanisms to the membranes of SMG duct cells. Na+-coupled bicarbonate transporter, NBCe1-B, chloride-bicarbonate exchanger SLC4A2/AE2 (Cl−-HCO3−) and NKCC1 (Na+-K+-2Cl−) are present at the basolateral membrane, whereas the anion exchanger SLC26A6 and cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator, CFTR, are present at the luminal membrane. The basolateral entry step for HCO3− is likely mediated by NBCe1-B. This is the first report on the presence of CFTR and SLC26A6 in the esophagus. We have demonstrated that CFTR activity is important for HCO3− secretion. As such, CFTR may act as a channel that mediates HCO3− efflux and/or activates luminal SLC26A6. Our study could explain the high incidence of esophageal disease in cystic fibrosis patients.
GRANTS
This work was supported by a Merit grant from the Office of Research and Development (Health Services R&D), Department of Veterans Affairs (to S. Abdulnour-Nakhoul) and by National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Grant DK-62295 (to N. L. Nakhoul). H. N. Nakhoul was the recipient of a Student Research Fellowship Award from the Foundation of the American Gastroenterological Association.
DISCLOSURES
No conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, are declared by the author(s).
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Anita Verdun for donating the pig tissues and Dr. Courtney Lopreore for help with confocal microscopy.
REFERENCES
- 1. Abdulnour-Nakhoul S, Nakhoul NL, Orlando RC. Lumen-to-surface pH gradients in opossum and rabbit esophagi: role of submucosal glands. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 278: G113–G120, 2000 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Abdulnour-Nakhoul S, Nakhoul NL, Wheeler SA, Wang P, Swenson ER, Orlando RC. HCO3− secretion in the esophageal submucosal glands. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 288: G736–G744, 2005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Abdulnour-Nakhoul S, Nakhoul NL, Wheeler SA, Haque S, Wang P, Brown K, Orlando GS, Orlando RC. Characterization of esophageal submucosal glands in pig tissue and cultures. Dig Dis Sci 52: 3054–3065, 2007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Abuladze N, Lee I, Newman D, Hwang J, Boorer K, Pushkin A, Kurtz I. Molecular cloning, chromosomal localization, tissue distribution, and functional expression of the human pancreatic sodium bicarbonate cotransporter. J Biol Chem 273: 17689–17695, 1998 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Al Yassin TM, Toner PG. Fine structure of squamous epithelium and submucosal glands of human oesophagus. J Anat 123: 705–721, 1977 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Al-Nakkash L, Clarke LL, Rottinghaus GE, Chen YJ, Cooper K, Rubin LJ. Dietary genistein stimulates anion secretion across female murine intestine. J Nutr 136: 2785–2790, 2006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Alper SL, Chernova MN, Stewart AK. Regulation of Na+-independent Cl−/HCO3− exchangers by pH. J Pancreas 2: 171–175, 2001 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Bachmann O, Rossmann H, Berger UV, Colledge WH, Ratcliff R, Evans MJ, Gregor M, Seidler U. cAMP-mediated regulation of murine intestinal/pancreatic Na+/HCO3− cotransporter subtype pNBC1. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 284: G37–G45, 2003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Ballard ST, Trout L, Bebok Z, Sorscher EJ, Crews A. CFTR involvement in chloride, bicarbonate, and liquid secretion by airway submucosal glands. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 277: L694–L699, 1999 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Ballard ST, Trout L, Garrison J, Inglis SK. Ionic mechanism of forskolin-induced liquid secretion by porcine bronchi. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 290: L97–L104, 2006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Becq F, Mettey Y, Gray MA, Galietta LJ, Dormer RL, Merten M, Metaye T, Chappe V, Marvingt-Mounir C, Zegarra-Moran O, Tarran R, Bulteau L, Derand R, Pereira MM, McPherson MA, Rogier C, Joffre M, Argent BE, Sarrouilhe D, Kammouni W, Figarella C, Verrier B, Gola M, Vierfond JM. Development of substituted Benzo[c]quinolizinium compounds as novel activators of the cystic fibrosis chloride channel. J Biol Chem 274: 27415–27425, 1999 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Blondeau K, Pauwels A, Dupont L, Mertens V, Proesmans M, Orel R, Brecelj J, Lopez-Alonso M, Moya M, Malfroot A, De Wachter E, Vandenplas Y, Hauser B, Sifrim D. Characteristics of gastroesophageal reflux and potential risk of gastric content aspiration in children with cystic fibrosis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 50: 161–166 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Blondeau K, Dupont LJ, Mertens V, Verleden G, Malfroot A, Vandenplas Y, Hauser B, Sifrim D. Gastro-oesophageal reflux and aspiration of gastric contents in adult patients with cystic fibrosis. Gut 57: 1049–1055, 2008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Button BM, Heine RG, Catto-Smith AG, Phelan PD, Olinsky A. Postural drainage and gastro-oesophageal reflux in infants with cystic fibrosis. Arch Dis Child 76: 148–150, 1997 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Button BM, Roberts S, Kotsimbos TC, Levvey BJ, Williams TJ, Bailey M, Snell GI, Wilson JW. Gastroesophageal reflux (symptomatic and silent): a potentially significant problem in patients with cystic fibrosis before and after lung transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant 24: 1522–1529, 2005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Carlin RW, Sedlacek RL, Quesnell RR, Pierucci-Alves F, Grieger DM, Schultz BD. PVD9902, a porcine vas deferens epithelial cell line that exhibits neurotransmitter-stimulated anion secretion and expresses numerous HCO3− transporters. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 290: C1560–C1571, 2006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Carvalho-Oliveira I, Efthymiadou A, Malho R, Nogueira P, Tzetis M, Kanavakis E, Amaral MD, Penque D. CFTR localization in native airway cells and cell lines expressing wild-type or F508del-CFTR by a panel of different antibodies. J Histochem Cytochem 52: 193–203, 2004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Cho HJ, Joo NS, Wine JJ. Mucus secretion from individual submucosal glands of the ferret trachea. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 299: L124–L136, 2010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Christie KN, Thomson C, Hopwood D. A comparison of membrane enzymes of human and pig oesophagus; the pig oesophagus is a good model for studies of the gullet in man. Histochem J 27: 231–239, 1995 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. D'Ovidio F, Singer LG, Hadjiliadis D, Pierre A, Waddell TK, de Perrot M, Hutcheon M, Miller L, Darling G, Keshavjee S. Prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux in end-stage lung disease candidates for lung transplant. Ann Thorac Surg 80: 1254–1260, 2005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Eggermont E. Gastrointestinal manifestations in cystic fibrosis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 8: 731–738, 1996 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Evans RL, Park K, Turner RJ, Watson GE, Nguyen HV, Dennett MR, Hand AR, Flagella M, Shull GE, Melvin JE. Severe impairment of salivation in Na+/K+/2Cl− cotransporter (NKCC1)-deficient mice. J Biol Chem 275: 26720–26726, 2000 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Galietta LJ, Springsteel MF, Eda M, Niedzinski EJ, By K, Haddadin MJ, Kurth MJ, Nantz MH, Verkman AS. Novel CFTR chloride channel activators identified by screening of combinatorial libraries based on flavone and benzoquinolizinium lead compounds. J Biol Chem 276: 19723–19728, 2001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Gaskin KJ, Durie PR, Corey M, Wei P, Forstner GG. Evidence for a primary defect of pancreatic HCO3− secretion in cystic fibrosis. Pediatr Res 16: 554–557, 1982 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Gustafsson PM, Fransson SG, Kjellman NI, Tibbling L. Gastro-oesophageal reflux and severity of pulmonary disease in cystic fibrosis. Scand J Gastroenterol 26: 449–456, 1991 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Heine RG, Button BM, Olinsky A, Phelan PD, Catto-Smith AG. Gastro-oesophageal reflux in infants under 6 months with cystic fibrosis. Arch Dis Child 78: 44–48, 1998 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Hopwood D, Coghill G, Sanders DS. Human oesophageal submucosal glands. Their detection mucin, enzyme and secretory protein content. Histochemistry 86: 107–112, 1986 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Illek B, Fischer H, Santos GF, Widdicombe JH, Machen TE, Reenstra WW. cAMP-independent activation of CFTR Cl channels by the tyrosine kinase inhibitor genistein. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 268: C886–C893, 1995 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Illek B, Fischer H, Machen TE. Genetic disorders of membrane transport. II. Regulation of CFTR by small molecules including HCO3−. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 275: G1221–G1226, 1998 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Joo NS, Wine JJ, Krouse ME. CFTR-independent secretion of alkaline mucus by esophageal submucosal glands (Abstract). Pediatric Pulmonology 29, Suppl: 290, 2006 [Google Scholar]
- 31. Ko SB, Zeng W, Dorwart MR, Luo X, Kim KH, Millen L, Goto H, Naruse S, Soyombo A, Thomas PJ, Muallem S. Gating of CFTR by the STAS domain of SLC26 transporters. Nat Cell Biol 6: 343–350, 2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Lytle C, Xu JC, Biemesderfer D, Haas M, Forbush Bd. The Na+-K+-Cl− cotransport protein of shark rectal gland. I. Development of monoclonal antibodies, immunoaffinity purification, and partial biochemical characterization. J Biol Chem 267: 25428–25437, 1992 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Lytle C, Xu JC, Biemesderfer D, Forbush B., III Distribution and diversity of Na+-K+-Cl− cotransport proteins: a study with monoclonal antibodies. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 269: C1496–C1505, 1995 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Ma T, Thiagarajah JR, Yang H, Sonawane ND, Folli C, Galietta LJ, Verkman AS. Thiazolidinone CFTR inhibitor identified by high-throughput screening blocks cholera toxin-induced intestinal fluid secretion. J Clin Invest 110: 1651–1658, 2002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Marino CR, Jeanes V, Boron WF, Schmitt BM. Expression and distribution of the Na+-HCO3− cotransporter in human pancreas. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 277: G487–G494, 1999 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Melani R, Tomati V, Galietta LJV, Zegarra-Moran O. Modulation of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) activity and genistein binding by cytosolic pH. J Biol Chem 285: 41591–41596, 2010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Mendes F, Farinha CM, Roxo-Rosa M, Fanen P, Edelman A, Dormer R, McPherson M, Davidson H, Puchelle E, De Jonge H, Heda GD, Gentzsch M, Lukacs G, Penque D, Amaral MD. Antibodies for CFTR studies. J Cyst Fibros 3, Suppl 2: 69–72, 2004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Meyers RL, Orlando RC. In vivo bicarbonate secretion by human esophagus. Gastroenterology 103: 1174–1178, 1992 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Nauntofte B. Regulation of electrolyte and fluid secretion in salivary acinar cells. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 263: G823–G837, 1992 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Pereira JC. [Lung diseases and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease]. Rev Port Pneumol 15: 899–921, 2009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Poulsen JH, Fischer H, Illek B, Machen TE. Bicarbonate conductance and pH regulatory capability of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91: 5340–5344, 1994 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Quinton PM. Cystic fibrosis: lessons from the sweat gland. Physiology (Bethesda) 22: 212–225, 2007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Rochelle LG, Li DC, Ye H, Lee E, Talbot CR, Boucher RC. Distribution of ion transport mRNAs throughout murine nose and lung. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 279: L14–L24, 2000 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Roussa E, Romero MF, Schmitt BM, Boron WF, Alper SL, Thevenod F. Immunolocalization of anion exchanger AE2 and Na+-HCO3− cotransporter in rat parotid and submandibular glands. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 277: G1288–G1296, 1999 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Schmitt BM, Biemesderfer D, Romero MF, Boulpaep EL, Boron WF. Immunolocalization of the electrogenic Na+-HCO3− cotransporter in mammalian and amphibian kidney. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 276: F27–F38, 1999 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Schultz BD, DeRoos AD, Venglarik CJ, Singh AK, Frizzell RA, Bridges RJ. Glibenclamide blockade of CFTR chloride channels. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 271: L192–L200, 1996 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Schultz BD, Singh AK, Devor DC, Bridges RJ. Pharmacology of CFTR chloride channel activity. Physiol Rev 79, Suppl 1: S109–S144, 1999 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Shcheynikov N, Ko SB, Zeng W, Choi JY, Dorwart MR, Thomas PJ, Muallem S. Regulatory interaction between CFTR and the SLC26 transporters. Novartis Found Symp 273: 177–186, 2006 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Stewart AK, Yamamoto A, Nakakuki M, Kondo T, Alper SL, Ishiguro H. Functional coupling of apical Cl−/HCO3− exchange with CFTR in stimulated HCO3− secretion by guinea pig interlobular pancreatic duct. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 296: G1307–G1317, 2009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Tabcharani JA, Jensen TJ, Riordan JR, Hanrahan JW. Bicarbonate permeability of the outwardly rectifying anion channel. J Membr Biol 112: 109–122, 1989 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Thiagarajah JR, Song Y, Haggie PM, Verkman AS. A small molecule CFTR inhibitor produces cystic fibrosis-like submucosal gland fluid secretions in normal airways. FASEB J 18: 875–877, 2004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Tizzano EF, Chitayat D, Buchwald M. Cell-specific localization of CFTR mRNA shows developmentally regulated expression in human fetal tissues. Hum Mol Genet 2: 219–224, 1993 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Wei H, Lobenberg R. Biorelevant dissolution media as a predictive tool for glyburide a class II drug. Eur J Pharm Sci 29: 45–52, 2006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Wilschanski M, Durie PR. Patterns of GI disease in adulthood associated with mutations in the CFTR gene. Gut 56: 1153–1163, 2007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Young JA, Schogel E. Micropuncture investigation of sodium and potassium excretion in rat submaxillary saliva. Pflügers Arch 291: 85–98, 1966 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Zeng W, Lee MG, Yan M, Diaz J, Benjamin I, Marino CR, Kopito R, Freedman S, Cotton C, Muallem S, Thomas P. Immuno and functional characterization of CFTR in submandibular and pancreatic acinar and duct cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 273: C442–C455, 1997 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.