Abstract
We previously found that downregulation of protein kinase Cα (PKCα) can inhibit retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) cell proliferation involved in the development of proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR). In this study, we tested whether PKCα could be downregulated via small interfering RNA (siRNA)-PKCα released from foldable capsular vitreous body (FCVB) in cultured human RPE cells. SiRNA-PKCα content, determined by ultraviolet (UV) spectrophotometer, was released from FCVB containing 200, 300, 400, 500, and 600 nm siRNA-PKCα in a time-dependent manner from 1 to 96 hours and a dose-dependent manner at five concentrations. The content (y) had a good linear relationship with time (x), especially in the 600 nm siRNA-PKCα group (y = 16.214x, R2 = 0.9809). After treatment with siRNA-PKCα released from FCVBs, the PKCα was significantly decreased by RT-PCR, Western blot, and immunofluorescence analysis in RPE cells. These results indicate that PKCα was significantly downregulated by siRNA-PKCα released from FCVB in human RPE cells and provide us with a new avenue to prevent PVR.
Keywords: small interfering RNA–protein kinase Cα, foldable capsular vitreous body, drug delivery system, retinal pigment epithelium, protein kinase Cα
Introduction
Proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) is a severe complication of retinal detachment and the most common reason for the failure of retinal detachment surgery.1,2 The risk of PVR varies from 10% to 40% depending on the original diseases.3,4 The pathology of PVR involves a complex network of relationships of cellular and humoral factors, in which proliferating retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) cells are thought to be an initiating factor.5–8 Protein kinase C (PKC) is an intracellular enzyme family, which transduces extracellular signals into intracellular responses. It has been well documented that the PKC family is involved in a series of life phenomena such as cell communication, secretion, ion channel regulation, cell proliferation and differentiation, and cancer, implying it is an ideal target for blocking signal transduction.9–12 Our previous study found that, of the ten kinds of PKC isoforms expressed in RPE cells, only PKCα is downstream of the confluence of the complex PVR network, which can promote RPE cell proliferation by downregulation of p27 Kip1.13,14 All of these studies strongly suggest that PKCα is an ideal and special blocking target for PVR.
Drug delivery to the posterior segments of the eye presents considerable challenges, because drugs administered by the conventional routes of topical or systemic dosing are usually ineffective due to the existence of critical barriers (such as corneal, blood–retinal, and blood–aqueous barriers) and short drug half-lives.15,16 Considering these challenges, development of a drug delivery system (DDS) is becoming increasingly important in the treatment of vitreoretinal diseases not only to facilitate drug efficacy but also to attenuate adverse effects.17
In our previous studies, we discovered that foldable capsular vitreous body (FCVB) is a public release vehicle DDS and can sustainably and mechanically release dexamethasone sodium phosphate (DexP) via the capsule apertures.18 In the clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00910702) evaluating the flexibility, efficacy, and safety of an FCVB in the treatment of severe retinal detachment, the FCVB was shown to be flexible, effective, and safe as a vitreous substitute over a 3-month implantation time. The FCVB used in the clinical trial consists of a thin vitreous-shaped capsule with a tube-valve system made using computer and industrial technology.19–21
RNA interference (RNAi) is an ancient and common biological phenomenon discovered in vivo in recent years.22 It is commonly used as a powerful tool in biological and biomedical research and has been used experimentally to prevent ocular neovascularization and inflammation.23–25 In our previous research, small interfering RNA (siRNA)-PKCα), a specific inhibitor of PKCα, was shown to be able to inhibit RPE cell proliferation.14 Therefore, in this study, we investigate whether PKCα could be downregulated via siRNA-PKCα released from FCVB in cultured human RPE cells, providing us with a new avenue to prevent PVR.
Materials and methods
Characteristics of siRNA-PKCα
SiRNA-PKCα was purchased from Ribuo Biotech (Guangzhou, China). The sequence of siRNA-PKCα was: positive-sense strand 5′GGCGUCCUGUUGUAUGAAAdAdT3′, antisense strand 3′dTdACCGCAGGACAACAUACUUU5′. Chemically synthesized siRNA-PKCα was mixed the suspension of two deoxyribose nucleotides to increase the stability in its 3′ end. Lyophilized powder of siRNA-PKCα was dissolved in TE buffer (110 mM Tris·HCl, 1 mM EDTA, pH = 8.00) into the stock concentration of 20 μM, and stored at −20°C.
Basic material and fabrication of the FCVB
FCVB is made of tailor-made modified liquid silicone rubber, which consists of a vitreous-like capsule and a tube-valve system (shown in Figure 1A). The basic material, Dow Corning Class VI elastomer, was purchased from Dow Corning Company (Midland, MI). The details of FCVB were described in our previous study.19
Figure 1.
Small interfering RNA–protein kinase Cα (SiRNA-PKCα) sustained-release studies in vitro. (A) Foldable capsular vitreous body (FCVB) consists of a thin (60 μm) vitreous-like capsule mimicked by computer with a tube-valve system. (B) SiRNA-PKCα at concentrations of 200, 300, 400, 500, and 600 nM in TE buffer was injected into the capsules of FCVB, which were immersed in cups of modified Frans diffusion cells. Two hundred (200) μL liquid was aspirated at time intervals of 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours.
In vitro drug sustained-release studies
In a typical experiment, siRNA-PKCα at concentrations of 200, 300, 400, 500, and 600 nm in TE buffer was injected into the capsules of the FCVBs, and the FCVBs were separately immersed in five cups of modified Franz diffusion cells (shown in Figure 1B) and 4 mL of TE buffer as release medium was transferred into each cup. These cups were kept in an orbital shaker maintained at 37°C with constant agitation. Two hundred microliters (200 μL) of the release medium was aspirated for measurement at 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours, and then the same amount of fresh medium was added into the cups. The collected samples were stored in a refrigerator. The siRNA-PKCα content in the liquid was then detected by UV spectrophotometer (DU800; Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA).
SiRNA-PKCα sample assay in vitro
First, a standard curve was made to demonstrate the effectiveness of the assay method. In brief, the 20 μM siRNA-PKCα stock solution was serially diluted with TE buffer to the desired concentrations: 20, 40, 60, 80, 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, and 600 nm. Samples of 100 μL were transferred into the cuvette chamber. Samples were assayed at the absorbance of 260 nm, and 100 μL of TE buffer was added to blank the background. Calibrations were made using Excel software (2003; Microsoft, Redmond, WA).
Micromorphology of the FCVB
The capsule of the FCVB was cut into a 1-cm diameter disc, and then the sample was cleaned, coated with gold, and fixed on a specimen stub. The image of the specimen surface was captured with a scanning electron microscope (XL 30 ESEM FEG; FEI-Philips, Eindhoven, the Netherlands). Examinations were carried out at 10 kV and in a humid atmosphere of approximately 1.8–2.0 Torr. Individual parameters are visible in the scale bar of each image.
Human RPE cell culture
Human RPE cells were isolated within 24 hours of death from donor eyes, which were obtained from the Eye Bank of the Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center as previously described.26 The project was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center and followed the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. RPE cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM; Invitrogen-Gibco, Karlsruhe, Germany) containing 10% fetal bovine serum, penicillin G (100 μg/mL), streptomycin sulfate (100 mg/mL), and L-glutamate in Corning culture plates. The cells were maintained at 37° C in 5% CO2 in a humidified atmosphere, and those between the third and sixth passages were used for all experiments.
Treatment of human RPE cells with siRNA-PKCα released from FCVB
Human RPE cells grown in transwells (Corning Inc, Corning, NY) were incubated for 12 hours. The culture media was then replaced with DMEM without serum or antibiotics, and filter inserts (8 μm pore size) carrying FCVBs containing 400, 500, and 600 nm siRNA-PKCα were transferred to transwells. Lipofectamine 2000 (5 μL) (Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany) was added to each well at time points of 48, 24, and 12 hours for each group, and the medium in each well was replaced with DMEM with 10% fetal bovine serum 6 hours later. Eighteen hours later, cells were harvested for Western blot and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). For immunofluorescence analysis, cells which were grown on cover lips in transwells were subjected to the same treatments as Western blot and RT-PCR. Cells treated by DMEM with 10% fetal bovine serum and transfected with 100 nm siRNA for 24 hours were used for blank control and positive control, respectively.
RT-PCR
Total RNA was extracted using Trizol reagent (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD). The integrity of the RNA was checked by 2% agarose gel electrophoresis. Approximately 2 μg RNA was reverse-transcribed following the protocol of the Super Script™ first-strand synthesis system. CDNAs encoding PKCα and GAPDH genes were amplified by PCR as follows: denaturation at 94°C for 30 seconds, annealing at 63°C for 30 seconds and elongation at 72°C for 45 seconds. Primer sequence was designed using Primer 3. For PKCα, the forward primer was 5′-ATCCGCAGTGGAATGAGTC CTTTACAT-3′, and the reverse primer was 5′-TTGGAAG GTTGTTTCCTGTCTTCAGAG-3′. A housekeeping gene, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) was used as the internal control. The forward primer was 5′-ACCCAGAAGACTGTGGATGG-3′, and the reverse primer was 5′-TGCTGTAGCCAAATTCGTTG-3′. PCR products were analyzed by agarose (2%) gel electrophoresis. Quantifications of signal intensity were confirmed using a specific computer program (Image J 1.43U software, Wayne Rasband, National Institutes of Health, USA).
Preparation of cell extracts
The medium was removed and the plates were washed twice with ice-cold phosphate buffered saline (PBS). The human RPE cells were lysed with sample buffer that contained 60 mM Tris, pH 6.8, 2% (w/v) sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 100 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, and 0.01% (w/v) bromophenol blue.27 The lysate was then incubated on ice for 30 minutes. The lysate was scraped using a cell scraper and harvested using a pipettor, then centrifuged at 4°C for 30 minutes. The supernatant was collected and boiled for 5 minutes and stored at −20°C.
Western blot analysis
Cellular extracts from human RPE cells were processed for Western blot analysis.28 Briefly, 60 μg of protein per well was loaded on a 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) gel. The protein was electro-transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Millipore, Billerica, MA) for 1 hour at 350 mA, then blocked with Tris-buffered saline (TBS) containing 5% nonfat milk and 0.1% Tween-20 (TBST) for 1 hour and incubated with mouse anti-PKCα (BD Systems, Torrance, CA) overnight. After three washes with TBST, the membranes were incubated with horseradish peroxidase conjugated secondary antibody for 1 hour at room temperature and washed with TBST. Localization of the antibody was detected by chemiluminescence using the ECL kit (Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. β-actin (Boster Biologic Technology Ltd, Wuhan, China) was used as an internal control.
Immunofluorescence analysis
After treatment, cells were fixed for 15 minutes in 4% paraformaldehyde, and then rinsed three times in PBS. All reagent incubations were performed in a humidified chamber. The mouse anti-PKCα was incubated for 16 hours in PBS at room temperature; horse serum was used as the negative control instead of the primary antibody. After washing four times for 10 minutes in PBS, fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled secondary antibodies were incubated for 40 minutes at 37°C. Then Hoechst 33342 was incubated for 10 minutes at room temperature. After three rinses in PBS, cover slips were mounted onto glass slides and analyzed on a Zeiss laser scanning confocal microscope (LSCM 510 META; Oberkochen, Germany).
Statistical analysis
All data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). All experiments were repeated at least 4 times, and similar results were obtained. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), the test of homogeneity of variances, and a post hoc test (Bonferroni test) were used to determine significant differences between the treated groups and the control groups. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Selectivity and acceptability of the standard curve
A representative result of the standard curve is shown in Figure 2A. The standard curve showed a very good linear relationship (y = 2976.3x, R2 = 1), demonstrating that the method selected had good selectivity and acceptability.
Figure 2.
Standard curve and in vitro release profile in the cumulative amount of five different concentrations. (A) The standard curve had a very good linear relationship. With the absorbance (x) increase, the small interfering RNA–protein kinase Cα (SiRNA-PKCα) concentration (y) rose accordingly (y = 2976.3x, R2 = 1). B–G) Time and dose-dependent release. The siRNA-PKCα released from the foldable capsular vitreous body (FCVB) increased in a linear manner with time. Of the five different concentrations, the 600 nM group had a best linear relationship (y = 16.214x, R2 = 0.9809). When siRNA-PKCα concentration rose inside the FCVBs, the content released from the capsules rose accordingly. The tendency began from 1 hour, and lasted until 96 hours.
Notes: Results shown were representative of four repeated experiments. The concentrations of different time points are statistically different (P < 0.05). The data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD).
In vitro release of siRNA-PKCα
The cumulative release of siRNA-PKCα from FCVB is shown in Figure 2B–2G. SiRNA-PKCα released from the capsules of FCVB increased with time in a 96-hour experimental time period. The content (y) had a good linear relationship with time (x), especially in the 600 nm group, indicating that the FCVB released siRNA-PKCα stably with time (y = 16.214x, R2 = 0.9809) (P < 0.05).
The contents released from FCVB increased accordingly, with siRNA-PKCα concentration rising in the FCVB. The released content was much greater in the 600 nm group at the same release time than in the other groups. All data indicated that siRNA-PKCα was released from the capsules of FCVB in a dose-dependent manner in vitro in 5 concentrations during a 96-hour experiment time period.
Scanning electron microscopy image of the FCVB
Before the experiment, scattered mini apertures of 300 nm could be seen in the capsule of FCVB by scanning electron microscopy. Figure 3A shows 2 of the typical apertures. After a 96-hour experimental time period, 300-nm mini apertures still existed in the capsules, as shown in Figure 3B. No great changes were observed in the capsule apertures by scanning electron microscopy.
Figure 3.
Scanning electron microscope images of the capsule of the foldable capsular vitreous body. Mini apertures of 300 nm in the capsules were observed before the release (A) and at the end of the experiment time (B) (arrows).
PKCα downregulation after treatment by siRNA-PKCα released from FCVB
As shown in Figure 4A1 and 4A2, RT-PCR results showed that PKCα messenger RNA (mRNA) was significantly downregulated following 24-hour release siRNA-PKCα treatments in the 400 nm, 500 nm, and 600 nm release groups. Consistent with a change at the mRNA level, the PKCα protein after treatment decreased 45.1% ± 6.73%, 50.8% ± 4.96%, and 54.3% ± 3.62% in the 400 nm, 500 nm, and 600 nm release groups, respectively, and 64.0% ± 4.5% in the positive control of 100 nm siRNA-PKCα treated group compared with that in the untreated control group (Figure 4B1 and 4B2). In the untreated RPE cells, both the mRNA and protein level remained constant. These data indicate that siRNA-PKCα can actually be released from the FCVBs and further decrease expression of PKCα in cultured human RPE cells.
Figure 4.
Expression of protein kinase Cα (PKCα) messenger RNA (mRNA) and protein downregulation by released small interfering RNA (siRNA)-PKCα in retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) cells. A1, A2) RT-PCR showed that released siRNA-PKCα reduced the mRNA levels of PKCα significantly compared with control groups. *P < 0.05 vs the corresponding value for control groups. Data are the mean ± standard deviation of quadruplicates from an experiment that was repeated with similar results (siRNA100 means RPE cells treated with 100 nM siRNA-PKCα; R400, R500, and R600 mean RPE cells treated with siRNA-PKCα released from foldable capsular vitreous bodies containing 400, 500, and 600 nM siRNA-PKCα). B1, B2) Western blot showed that released siRNA-PKCα reduced the protein levels of PKCα significantly compared with control groups.
We further examined the expression changes of PKCα using immunocytochemistry. The cultured human RPE cells formed a monolayer with typical polygonal cellular arrays, as shown in Figure 5. Compatible with findings from RT-PCR and Western blot analysis, staining of PKCα decreased significantly after exposure to both 100 nm siRNA-PKCα and siRNA-PKCα released from FCVBs. Compared with the positive control of 100 nm siRNA-PKCα treated group, the stain did not change greatly in the experimental groups.
Figure 5.
Confocal images of protein kinase Cα (PKCα) expression in retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) cells by different treatments. PKCα staining was much lighter in the small interfering RNA (siRNA)-PKCα treatment than in the control, with no significant difference in the released siRNA-PKCα treatment groups. (A) blank control. (B) RPE cells treated with 100 nM siRNA-PKCα. (C–E) RPE cells treated with siRNA-PKCα released from foldable capsular vitreous bodies containing 400, 500, and 600 nM siRNA-PKCα, respectively. (1) PKCα staining in the cytoplasm and nuclei of RPE cells. (2) Staining of the nuclei with Hoechst 33342. (3) An overlay of images 1 and 2. Scale bars, 20 μm. Magnification × 1000.
Discussion
In this study, we determined the siRNA-PKCα release of a nonbiodegradable device (FCVB) and its effect on PKCα in cultured human RPE cells. Our present study indicates that FCVB can mechanically and sustainably release siRNA-PKCα in a time-dependent and dose-dependent manner during a 96-hour experimental time period. Furthermore, PKCα was decreased in RPE cells treated with siRNA-PKCα released from FCVBs. However, compared with the positive control group, expression of the target protein did not decrease remarkably with our experimental systems even in the presence of transfection reagents. This is likely attributable to the fact that our FCVB drug delivery system released siRNA-PKCα progressively and to the fact that siRNA-PKCα of the positive control group reached peak concentration quickly. The present results were consistent with a previous study that FCVB can sustainably, mechanically release DexP via the apertures of the capsule in a time-dependent and dose-dependent manner.18
In this study, siRNA-PKCα was shown to be fairly permeable through the capsule apertures of FCVB and to downregulate PKCα in RPE cells. We speculated that there were two main factors involved in the mechanism. The first is the concentration gradient of siRNA-PKCα. With the concentration gradient increase, siRNA-PKCα released from the FCVBs subsequently increased, as shown in Figure 2B–2G. Second, the diffusion coefficient was related to the concentration gradient. The two factors mentioned previously have been reported by Acharya and colleagues in a homogeneous poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) microstructures drug release system.29
The current intraocular DDS confronts some major disadvantages. For example, they are opaque, may interfere with vision, and result in a nonuniform drug distribution.30 In contrast to the current intraocular DDS, FCVB has good transparency and induces very little refractive shift,31 permitting the siRNA-PKCα in solution to make direct contact with the retina and achieve targeted drug delivery. Therefore, the FCVB can sustainably and mechanically release drugs without changing their chemical properties, and may provide a common vehicle for releasing different drugs.
The ideal intravitreal DDS is a kind of material that is not only an intravitreal drug delivery system but also a vitreous tamponade agent.30 Previous studies demonstrated that FCVB was a fine vitreous substitute that closely mimicked vitreous morphology and restored its physiological functions, such as support and cellular barriers, during a 3-month implantation period without the obvious complications commonly induced by silicone oil.32 In our study, siRNA-PKCα was released from FCVB in a time-dependent and a dose-dependent manner in vitro. SiRNA-PKCα was detected until 96 hours, indicating that FCVB can be used as a DDS in addition to serving as a vitreous substitute.
Instability is one of the essential obstacles of the RNAi therapeutic applications.33 SiRNA is easily degraded by nucleases in vitro and in vivo. Andrieu-Soler and his colleagues have demonstrated that there was high nuclease activity in the vitreous.34 To solve the problem, siRNA-PKCα combined with FCVB shows great advantages. On the one hand, chemically synthesized siRNA-PKCα was mixed with the suspension of 2 deoxyribose nucleotides to increase the stability in its 3′ end; on the other hand, siRNA-PKCα was injected into the capsule of FCVB, protecting it from contacting nucleases in vitro and in vivo. In addition, Ambati J and colleagues reported that 21-nt or longer siRNAs suppress hemanogiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis in various mouse models of neovascularization in a sequence- and target-independent manner through activating cell surface Toll-like receptor 3.35,36 Therefore, it is critical to address the safety issue using in vivo systems.
The underlying factor in many vision-threatening vitreo-retinal diseases is unwanted intraocular cell proliferation.37 In the pathology of PVR, proliferating RPE cells are thought to be an initiating factor.5–8 In a previous study, we found that PKCα affects the cell cycle progression and proliferation in RPE cells through the downregulation of p27kip1.14 Since PKCα was downregulated after exposure to siRNA-PKCα released from FCVB, it may be a rational approach for targeted therapies against RPE cell proliferation and PVR disease.
Intravitreal sustained-release systems are exciting new modalities of drug delivery that offer effective treatment of some visually devastating diseases.38 SiRNA-PKCα combined with FCVB shows great prospects for preventing PVR, and it will greatly reduce the suffering and economic burden of patients. As a public release vehicle, FCVB has the potential to release several drugs at the same time, which will meet the requirements of drug combinations for many diseases.
In conclusion, FCVB can sustainably and mechanically release siRNA-PKCα via capsule apertures in a time-dependent and dose-dependent manner in addition to serving as a vitreous substitute. The in vitro study demonstrated that PKCα was inhibited after exposure to siRNA-PKCα released from FCVBs. The present research offers a new avenue for the treatment of diseases of the posterior segment of eyes, especially proliferative eye diseases.
Conclusion
In this study, we developed a FCVB drug delivery system to release siRNA-PKCα to inhibit PKCα expression in RPE cells in vitro. We found that PKCα was significantly downregulated by siRNA-PKCα released from FCVB, providing a new avenue to prevent PVR.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by Natural National Science Foundation of China (NSFC-30973258) and the National Basic Research Program of China (“973” program, Number 2007CB512200). The Eye Bank of Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center is thanked for providing eye cups for primary cell culture.
Footnotes
Disclosure
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
References
- 1.Sunalp MA, Wiedemann P, Sorgente N, Ryan SJ. Effect of adriamycin on experimental proliferative vitreoretinopathy in the rabbit. Exp Eye Res. 1985;41(1):105–115. doi: 10.1016/0014-4835(85)90099-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Cowley M, Conway BP, Campochiaro PA, Kaiser D, Gaskin H. Clinical risk factors for proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1989;107(8):1147–1151. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1989.01070020213027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kirchhof B. Strategies to influence PVR development. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2004;242(8):699–703. doi: 10.1007/s00417-004-0978-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Cardillo JA, Stout JT, LaBree L, et al. Post-traumatic proliferative vitreoretinopathy. The epidemiologic profile, onset, risk factors, and visual outcome. Ophthalmology. 1997;104(7):1166–1173. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(97)30167-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Murphy TL, Sakamoto T, Hinton DR, et al. Migration of retinal pigment epithelium cells in vitro is regulated by protein kinase C. Exp Eye Res. 1995;60(6):683–695. doi: 10.1016/s0014-4835(05)80010-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Harris MS, Sakamoto T, Kimura H, et al. Hypericin inhibits cell growth and induces apoptosis in retinal pigment epithelial cells: possible involvement of protein kinase C. Curr Eye Res. 1996;15(3):255–262. doi: 10.3109/02713689609007619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sheu SJ, Sakamoto T, Osusky R, et al. Transforming growth factor-beta regulates human retinal pigment epithelial cell phagocytosis by influencing a protein kinase C-dependent pathway. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1994;232(11):695–701. doi: 10.1007/BF00171387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sakamoto T, Hinton DR, Sakamoto H, et al. Collagen gel contraction induced by retinal pigment epithelial cells and choroidal fibroblasts involves the protein kinase C pathway. Curr Eye Res. 1994;13(6):451–459. doi: 10.3109/02713689408999873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Nishizuka Y. The molecular heterogeneity of protein kinase C and its implications for cellular regulation. Nature. 1988;334(6184):661–665. doi: 10.1038/334661a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Moriarty P, Dickson AJ, Erichsen JT, Boulton M. Protein kinase C isoenzyme expression in retinal cells. Ophthalmic Res. 2000;32(2–3):57–60. doi: 10.1159/000055590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Evans VG. Multiple pathways to apoptosis. Cell Biol Int. 1993;17(5):461–476. doi: 10.1006/cbir.1993.1087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kizaki H, Suzuki K, Tadakuma T, Ishimura Y. Adenosine receptor-mediated accumulation of cyclic AMP-induced T-lymphocyte death through internucleosomal DNA cleavage. J Biol Chem. 1990;265(9):5280–5284. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Yu K, Ma P, Ge J, et al. Expression of protein kinase C isoforms in cultured human retinal pigment epithelial cells. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2007;245(7):993–999. doi: 10.1007/s00417-006-0467-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Gao Q, Tan J, Ma P, et al. PKC alpha affects cell cycle progression and proliferation in human RPE cells through the downregulation of p27kip1. Mol Vis. 2009;15:2683–2695. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hughes PM, Olejnik O, Chang-Lin JE, Wilson CG. Topical and systemic drug delivery to the posterior segments. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2005;57(14):2010–2032. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2005.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Cunha-Vaz JG. The blood-ocular barriers: past, present, and future. Doc Ophthalmol. 1997;93(1–2):149–157. doi: 10.1007/BF02569055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Yasukawa T, Ogura Y, Tabata Y, Kimura H, Wiedemann P, Honda Y. Drug delivery systems for vitreoretinal diseases. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2004;23(3):253–281. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2004.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Liu Y, Ke Q, Chen J, et al. Sustained mechanical release of dexamethasone sodium phosphate from a foldable capsular vitreous body. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51(3):1636–1642. doi: 10.1167/iovs.09-4134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Liu Y, Jiang Z, Gao Q, et al. Technical standards of a foldable capsular vitreous body in terms of mechanical, optical, and biocompatible properties. Artif Organs. 2010;34(10):836–845. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2010.01006.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lin X, Ge J, Gao Q, et al. Evaluation of the flexibility, efficacy, and safety of a foldable capsular vitreous body in the treatment of severe retinal detachment. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(1):374–381. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-5869. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Gao Q, Mou S, Ge J, et al. A new strategy to replace the natural vitreous by a novel capsular artificial vitreous body with pressure-control valve. Eye (Lond) 2008;22(3):461–468. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6702875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Bernstein E, Caudy AA, Hammond SM, Hannon GJ. Role for a bidentate ribonuclease in the initiation step of RNA interference. Nature. 2001;409(6818):363–366. doi: 10.1038/35053110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Novina CD, Sharp PA. The RNAi revolution. Nature. 2004;430(6996):161–164. doi: 10.1038/430161a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Reich SJ, Fosnot J, Kuroki A, et al. Small interfering RNA (siRNA) targeting VEGF effectively inhibits ocular neovascularization in a mouse model. Mol Vis. 2003;9:210–216. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Nakamura H, Siddiqui SS, Shen X, et al. RNA interference targeting transforming growth factor-beta type II receptor suppresses ocular inflammation and fibrosis. Mol Vis. 2004;10:703–711. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Cinatl J, Jr, Michaelis M, Fleckenstein C, et al. West Nile virus infection induces interferon signaling in human retinal pigment epithelial cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47(2):645–651. doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-1022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Campa MJ, Wang MZ, Howard B, Fitzgerald MC, Patz EF., Jr Protein expression profiling identifies macrophage migration inhibitory factor and cyclophilin a as potential molecular targets in non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Res. 2003;63(7):1652–1656. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Weaver SA, Schaefer AL, Dixon WT. Western blotting for detection of glucocorticoid receptors in the brain and pituitary gland from adrenal intact pigs. Brain Res. 2000;869(1–2):130–136. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(00)02358-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Acharya G, Shin CS, Vedantham K, et al. A study of drug release from homogeneous PLGA microstructures. J Control Release. 2010;146(2):201–206. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2010.03.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Colthurst MJ, Williams RL, Hiscott PS, Grierson I. Biomaterials used in the posterior segment of the eye. Biomaterials. 2000;21(7):649–665. doi: 10.1016/s0142-9612(99)00220-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Gao Q, Chen X, Ge J, et al. Refractive shifts in four selected artificial vitreous substitutes based on Gullstrand-Emsley and Liou-Brennan schematic eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50(7):3529–3534. doi: 10.1167/iovs.08-2802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Chen J, Gao Q, Liu Y, et al. Clinical device-related article evaluation of morphology and functions of a foldable capsular vitreous body in the rabbit eye. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2011;97(2):396–404. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.31812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Fattal E, Barratt G. Nanotechnologies and controlled release systems for the delivery of antisense oligonucleotides and small interfering RNA. Br J Pharmacol. 2009;157(2):179–194. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2009.00148.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Andrieu-Soler C, Bejjani RA, de Bizemont T, Normand N, BenEzra D, Behar-Cohen F. Ocular gene therapy: a review of nonviral strategies. Mol Vis. 2006;12:1334–1347. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kleinman ME, Yamada K, Takeda A, et al. Sequence- and target-independent angiogenesis suppression by siRNA via TLR3. Nature. 2008;452(7187):591–597. doi: 10.1038/nature06765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Cho WG, Albuquerque RJ, Kleinman ME, et al. Small interfering RNA-induced TLR3 activation inhibits blood and lymphatic vessel growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(17):7137–7142. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0812317106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Cheng L, Hostetler K, Valiaeva N, et al. Intravitreal crystalline drug delivery for intraocular proliferation diseases. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51(1):474–481. doi: 10.1167/iovs.09-3672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Guidetti B, Azéma J, Malet-Martino M, Martino R. Delivery systems for the treatment of proliferative vitreoretinopathy: materials, devices and colloidal carriers. Curr Drug Deliv. 2008;5(1):7–19. doi: 10.2174/156720108783331050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]





