Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Oct 8.
Published in final edited form as: Circ Res. 2011 May 19;109(2):183–192. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.111.245035

Nfatc1 Coordinates Valve Endocardial Cell Lineage Development Required for Heart Valve Formation

Bingruo Wu 1, Yidong Wang 1, Wendy Lui 1, Melissa Langworthy 1, Kevin L Tompkins 1, Antonis K Hatzopoulos 1, H Scott Baldwin 1, Bin Zhou 1
PMCID: PMC3132827  NIHMSID: NIHMS299095  PMID: 21597012

Abstract

Rationale

Formation of heart valves requires early endocardial to mesenchymal transformation (EMT) to generate valve mesenchyme and subsequent endocardial cell proliferation to elongate valve leaflets. Nfatc1 (nuclear factor of activated T cells, cytoplasmic 1) is highly expressed in valve endocardial cells and is required for normal valve formation, but its role in the fate of valve endocardial cells during valve development is unknown.

Objective

Our aim was to investigate the function of Nfatc1 in cell-fate decision making by valve endocardial cells during EMT and early valve elongation.

Methods and Results

Nfatc1 transcription enhancer was used to generate a novel valve endocardial cell–specific Cre mouse line for fate-mapping analyses of valve endocardial cells. The results demonstrate that a subpopulation of valve endocardial cells marked by the Nfatc1 enhancer do not undergo EMT. Instead, these cells remain within the endocardium as a proliferative population to support valve leaflet extension. In contrast, loss of Nfatc1 function leads to enhanced EMT and decreased proliferation of valve endocardium and mesenchyme. The results of blastocyst complementation assays show that Nfatc1 inhibits EMT in a cell-autonomous manner. We further reveal by gene expression studies that Nfatc1 suppresses transcription of Snail1 and Snail2, the key transcriptional factors for initiation of EMT.

Conclusions

These results show that Nfatc1 regulates the cell-fate decision making of valve endocardial cells during valve development and coordinates EMT and valve elongation by allocating endocardial cells to the 2 morphological events essential for valve development.

Keywords: valves, heart defects, congenital, endocardium


Congenital heart valve defects occur in 2% to 3% of the population and are the leading cause of perinatal and neonatal mortality and morbidity.1 Endocardial to mesenchymal transformation (EMT) gives rise to heart valve mesenchyme and plays a critical role in formation of heart valves.26 A critical step of early valve formation is the cell-fate decision that determines whether an endocardial cell will undergo EMT, becoming a valve core mesenchymal component, or maintain an endothelial phenotype and participate in the generation of a valve leaflet during valve remodeling or elongation. A balance in allocation of endocardial lineages to these 2 morphogenic processes must be achieved to form functional heart valves. Therefore, studying the underlying molecular mechanisms of the cell-fate decision-making process of valve endocardial cells during valve formation may provide new insight into the pathogenesis of congenital valvular heart disease.

Migration and invasion of some but not all endocardial cells into matrix-rich cushions is the hallmark of the EMT process,710 which is regulated at least in part by the extracellular matrix and soluble growth factors.1115 However, the mechanisms that permit only some endocardial cells to undergo EMT have not been fully understood. Additionally, although EMT gives rise to most, if not all, of the valve mesenchyme of the atrioventricular and semilunar valves,16,17 and similar morphogenic pathways are shared in the atrioventricular canal (AVC) and outflow tract (OFT),1821 accumulating genetic data suggest that there are unique morphogenic mechanisms that regulate semilunar valve formation.2227 One morphogenic process that differentiates AVC and OFT development involves a contribution from the migration and subsequent differentiation of cardiac neural crest28,29; aberrant cardiac neural crest function causes defects in semilunar valve remodeling/maturation.30,31

In the mouse, valvelike function in the OFT is initially provided at embryonic day (E) 8.5 by apposition of regional swellings of the extracellular matrix, also known as endocardial cushions, which ensures unidirectional blood flow.32 Shortly after E9.5, cardiac neural crest cells migrate into the OFT from the aortic arch in mice.33,34 At E10.5, a subpopulation of endocardial cells of the proximal OFT (pOFT) undergo EMT and invade the endocardial cushions.35 By E11.5, the OFT endocardial cushions form 2 spiral OFT ridges, which can each be morphologically divided into the distal OFT (dOFT) and the pOFT according to an OFT curvature.36,37 Although it is still unknown when the EMT ceases, the cushion begins remodeling between E11.5 and E12.5. By E12.5, coincident with septation of the cardiac outlet by fusion of the pOFT ridges, the earliest analogues of semilunar valve leaflets emerge at the distal-proximal OFT boundary as 3 pairs of condensed mesenchymal swellings developing from these ridges.35,36

Although extensive studies have shown that multiple signaling pathways between the endocardium and the myocardium at the AVC and OFT are involved in activating or promoting EMT,4,1115,3840 the mechanisms that regulate endocardial cell-fate decisions during EMT and elongation remain elusive. We and others have previously shown that nuclear factor of activated T cells-c1 (Nfatc1) is an endocardial transcription factor highly expressed in valve endocardial cells (designated as Nfatc1h cells hereafter) during EMT and valve elongation, and its inactivation in mice results in severe developmental arrest of heart valves, especially the semilunar valves.23,24,41 Our subsequent studies of Nfatc1 transcriptional regulation have identified a transcriptional enhancer that regulates the sustained expression of Nfatc1 in Nfatc1h cells through an autoregulatory loop.42 Nfatc1 autoregulation has been shown to be involved in cell-fate decisions in T-cell activation/expansion43 and osteoclastogenesis,44 which suggests that it may be functionally involved in valve endocardial cell-fate decisions during heart valve development. We hypothesized that regulation of valve endocardial cell lineage development by Nfatc1 is required for normal heart valve formation.

In the present study, we generated a novel valve endocardial cell–specific Cre mouse line for fate-mapping analyses of the valve endocardial cells to test this hypothesis. We also performed in vivo loss-of-function and blastocyst complementation analyses, in vitro EMT and endocardial cell differentiation assays, and gene expression studies. We show that the valve endocardial cells marked by the Nfatc1 enhancer do not undergo EMT and remain within the endocardium as a proliferative population to support valve leaflet extension during valve elongation and that Nfatc1 inhibits EMT in a cell-autonomous manner and suppresses transcription of Snail1 and Snail2, the key transcriptional factors for initiation of EMT. Together, these results reveal a previously unknown function for Nfatc1 in endocardial cell-fate decision making and indicate that Nfatc1 coordinates EMT and valve elongation by allocating the endocardial cells to the 2 morphological events essential for valve development.

Methods

Generation of Valve Endocardium-Specific Cre and LacZ Mouse Lines

Nfatc1-enhancer Cre (Nfatc1enCre) transgenic lines were generated by microinjection of a construct that contained a nuclear localized Cre inserted between an HSP68 minimal promoter and a 4.1-kb Nfatc1 intron 1 fragment42 into the fertilized eggs. The neural crest–specific Wnt1-Cre transgenic line (Wnt1Cre),33 the endothelium-specific Tie2-Cre transgenic line (Tie2Cre),16 and R26fslz reporter were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). The Nfatc1-null allele24 was maintained as a compound heterozygous for Tie2Cre+/−;Nfatc1+/− or Wnt1Cre+/−;Nfatc1+/−. All genetically altered mouse lines were backcrossed to inbred C57BL/6 mice (Charles River Laboratories, Wilmington, MA) for at least 8 generations. Mice were housed on a 6:00 AM to 6:00 PM light-dark cycle. Noontime on the day that vaginal plugs were detected was designated as E0.5. The maintenance of mice and animal experiments were performed according to protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University and Vanderbilt University School of Medicine.

Fate-Mapping Analyses and X-Gal Staining

The embryos or hearts were collected between E9.5 and E11.5 for fate mapping of Nfatc1h endocardial cells. To reveal the role of Nfatc1 in the fate development of endocardial cells during EMT and valve elongation, Tie2Cre+/−;Nfatc1+/− or Wnt1Cre+/−;Nfatc1+/− animals were crossed to R26fslz/fslz;Nfatc1+/− animals to generate wild-type Tie2Cre+/−;Nfatc1+/+ or Wnt1Cre+/−;Nfatc1+/+ and knockout Tie2Cre+/−;Nfatc1−/− or Wnt1Cre+/−;Nfatc1−/− embryos. Whole-mount X-gal staining of embryos or isolated hearts was performed as described previously.42 At least 5 age-matched littermates were examined at each stage. The contribution of endocardial lineage to OFT morphogenesis was determined by measurement of the ratio of the length of dOFT and pOFT in E10.5 or E11.5 embryos.

In Vitro Collagen Gel Assays

Collagen gel assays for EMT were performed as described previously,13 with modifications. E10.5 pOFT or E9.5 AVC explants were dissected from Nfatc1+/+ or Nfatc1−/− embryos and placed on collagen gels. An overnight adhesion was allowed, and the adhered explants were then cultured for 24 hours. Transforming endocardial cells were identified as those spindle-shaped cells that migrated away from the explants or invaded the gel, and these were counted manually.

Mouse Blastocyst Complementation Assay

Homozygous Nfatc1−/− embryonic stem (ES) cells45 were injected into wild-type Zin40 blastocysts, which constitutively express β-galactosidase in nuclei46 (Figure 5A). Embryos of E9.5 to E10.5 were isolated, fixed, and X-gal–stained as above. Contribution of the Nfatc1+/+ or Nfatc1−/− endocardial cells to the cushion mesenchyme was visualized and quantified in parallel in the same chimeric embryo as lacZ-expressing Nfatc1+/+ or lacZ-negative Nfatc1−/− cells, respectively.

Figure 5. Blastocyst complementation analysis shows Nfatc1 inhibits EMT in a cell-autonomous manner.

Figure 5

A, Diagram shows generation of chimeric embryos by wild-type blastocyst (LacZ-labeled) injection with Nfatc1−/− ES cells. B, X-gal–stained E9.5 heart section shows Nfatc1−/− endocardial cells (negative for LacZ) were integrated into the endocardium at AVC and OFT (arrowheads) and invaded the cushions (arrows). C and D, X-gal–stained E10.5 heart sections show transformed Nfatc1+/+ (positive for LacZ) Nfatc1−/− (negative for LacZ) endocardial cells at AVC and OFT cushions. More Nfatc1−/− transformed cells appear in both cushions (★). E, Quantitative analyses demonstrate significant increases in the transformation of Nfatc1−/− endocardial cells compared with Nfatc1+/+ endocardial cells (n=8 or 6 chimeric embryos examined at E9.5 or E10.5; Student t test; bar=SD).

In Vitro Endocardial Cell Differentiation Assay

Mouse endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) were transfected with the Nfatc1 enhancer-lacZ construct. After transfection, the EPCs were induced to undergo endothelial/endocardial differentiation in vitro in the presence of cAMP as described previously,47 and the expression of endothelial/endocardial markers was determined by semiquantitative reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Additionally, some cells were fixed in 3% paraformaldehyde for 10 minutes before they were costained with Pecam1 (platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1) and β-galactosidase to identify the Nfatc1h cells differentiated from EPCs.

Cell Proliferation and RT-PCR

Bromodeoxyuridine was used for pulse labeling of proliferating cells. Immunodetection of proliferating cells was performed with antibodies against bromodeoxyuridine and by the ABC method. For RT-PCR analysis, total RNAs were extracted from pooled E10.5 Nfatc1+/+ or Nfatc1−/− hearts. cDNA templates were generated, and RT-PCR was performed with the gene-specific primers listed in Online Table I (available in the Online Data Supplement at http://circres.ahajournals.org).

Results

Nfatc1h Endocardial Cells Do Not Undergo EMT

Nfatc1 is required for heart valve formation,23,24 but its function in EMT remains unclear. We have previously identified a tissue-specific enhancer that autoamplifies Nfatc1 expression in Nfatc1h cells during EMT and subsequent valve elongation.42 To reveal the role of Nfatc1 in determining whether endocardial cells will undergo EMT or remain in the endocardium and proliferate for valve elongation, we first used the Nfatc1 enhancer to generate an Nfatc1enCre mouse line to trace the fate of Nfatc1h cells during EMT and early valve elongation from E10.5 to E12.5. When bred to R26fslz mice, Cre activated lacZ expression in a subpopulation of valve endocardial cells or Nfatc1h cells at E10.5 AVC (Figure 1B). The number of lacZ-expressing descendants of Nfatc1h cells in the AVC increased from E10.5 to E11.5 (Figure 1C) and extended to the OFT (Figure 1D). By E12.5, the X-gal–stained descendants of Nfatc1h cells were seen along the growing edge of the atrioventricular or OFT valves (Figures 1E and 1F). Surprisingly, no descendants of Nfatc1h cells were found in the cushion mesenchyme (Figures 1B through 1F). We thus used direct lacZ reporter lines driven by the same Nfatc1 enhancer (Nfatc1enlz) as an indicator of Cre expression during EMT (Online Figure I, A). The results confirmed that the Nfatc1h cells marked by the enhancer lacZ (or Cre expression) were a subpopulation of cushion endocardium in E10.5 Nfatc1enlz embryos during EMT (Online Figure I, B and C). After EMT, lacZ expression was continuously restricted to Nfatc1h cells during valve elongation from E11.5 to E12.5 (Online Figure I, D through G). Therefore, by comparing lacZ expression in Nfatc1enlz embryos (Online Figure I) to the Cre-mediated lacZ expression in the Nfatc1enCre embryos (Figure 1), we determined that Nfatc1h cells did not undergo EMT. Additionally, Nfatc1h lineages did not contribute to the core mesenchyme of the remodeling valves; instead, they remained on the endocardial edges of the growing valve leaflets at E14.5 (Figure 2). Taken together, the genetic fate-mapping analyses indicate that Nfatc1h cells do not undergo EMT and suggest that Nfatc1 regulates valvulogenesis by preventing a subset of endocardial cells from undergoing EMT, thereby allocating them to valve elongation.

Figure 1. Fate mapping of Nfatc1h valve endocardial cells shows they do not undergo EMT.

Figure 1

A, Schematic of Nfatc1h cell fate mapping in Nfatc1enCre and R26fslz mice. X-gal staining of Nfatc1enCre;R26fslz heart sections shows that Nfatc1h lineages (arrows) contribute to the endocardium but not the mesenchyme during EMT at E10.5 and E11.5 (BD) and early valve elongation at E12.5 (E and F). HSP68 indicates heat shock protein 68; AV, atrioventricular.

Figure 2. Fate mapping of endocardial cells in mature valves shows that they do not contribute to valve mesenchyme.

Figure 2

A and B, Whole-mount X-gal staining of E14.5 Nfatc1enCre;R26fslz heart shows Nfatc1h cell lineage restricted to 4 heart valves. CF, Sectional views indicate that cells of the Nfatc1h lineage only contribute to the endocardium of mature valves; they do not become valve mesenchymal cells. Ao indicates aorta; Pa, pulmonary artery; AV, aortic valve; PV, pulmonary valve; MV, mitral valve; TV, tricuspid valve; LV, left ventricle; RV, right ventricle; and IVS, interventricular septum.

Nfatc1 Is Required to Establish OFT Mesenchymal Boundary

To determine whether Nfatc1 regulates endocardial cell fate during EMT, we next performed endocardial cell lineage tracing in Nfatc1-null embryos using Tie2Cre. We did not use Nfatc1enCre because the enhancer was autoregulated by Nfatc1 and was inactivated in the Nfatc1-null embryos.42 The combination of the Tie2Cre and R26fslz reporter allowed us to trace endocardial progenies that populated the cushion mesenchyme through EMT.16 We bred Tie2Cre;Nfatc1+/− to R26fslz;Nfatc1+/− mice to trace endocardial cells in Tie2Cre;R26fslz;Nfatc1+/+ or Tie2Cre;R26fslz;Nfatc1−/− embryos (Figure 3A). We found a segmental contribution of endocardium-derived mesenchyme to the pOFT and non–endocardium-derived mesenchyme to the dOFT that generated a tissue boundary in E10.5 Nfatc1+/+ embryos (Figure 3B). The boundary formed at the OFT bend, the anatomic site for future semilunar valves. However, in E10.5 Nfatc1−/− embryos, the boundary was disrupted by an extended endocardium-derived mesenchyme to the dOFT cushion (Figure 3C). At E11.5, although mixed mesenchymal cells invested the pOFT of Nfatc1+/+ embryos (Figure 3D), only endocardium-derived mesenchyme occupied the region in Nfatc1−/− embryos (Figure 3E). Further measurement of the lengths of dOFT and pOFT showed a relative shorting of the pOFT from E10.5 to E11.5 in Nfatc1+/+ embryos (Figures 3F and 3G). In contrast, shortening did not take place in Nfatc1−/− embryos, which led to a significantly longer pOFT in these embryos at E11.5 (Figure 3F). Additionally, the AVC of Nfatc1−/− embryos appeared elongated and rigid and packed with endocardium-derived mesenchymal cells (Figure 3E).

Figure 3. Fate mapping of endocardial cells shows that Nfatc1 deletion results in abnormal OFT morphogenesis.

Figure 3

A, Schematic of endocardial cell fate mapping in Tie2Cre;R26fslz;Nfatc1+/+ or Tie2Cre;R26fslz;Nfatc1−/− embryos using Nfatc1+/+ and Nfatc1−/− embryos. B and D, E10.5 and E11.5 Nfatc1+/+ heart sections stained with X-gal show that Tie2Cre-marked endocardium-derived mesenchymal cells locate at the pOFT, and LacZ-negative neural crest–derived mesenchyme locate at the dOFT. The 2 populations form a tissue boundary at the OFT curvature (B; line). C and E, E10.5 and E11.5 Nfatc1−/− heart sections show increased endocardium-derived mesenchyme that extends into the dOFT (line). F and G, Graphs show the lengths of dOFT and pOFT and indicate a relative shorting of the pOFT from E10.5 to E11.5 in Nfatc1+/+ but not in Nfatc1−/− embryos. n=5 paired embryos analyzed for each time point. A indicates atrium; AS, aortic sac; and V, ventricle.

Cardiac neural crest cells populate the dOFT cushion.17,31,34,48 A potential defect in migration of cardiac neural crest in Nfatc1−/− mice might result in their reduced contribution to the OFT tissue boundary. To determine whether this might have occurred, we used Wnt1Cre to trace migration of cardiac neural crest cells.33 We did not detect a difference in migration between Nfatc1+/+ and Nfatc1−/− embryos at E9.0 or E10.0 (Online Figure II, A through D); however, there appeared to be an attenuation of neural crest–derived mesenchyme in the dOFT of E12.5 NFATc1−/− embryos (Online Figure II, E and F), which affected the base of the forming aortic valve (Online Figure II, G and H). Together, the reciprocal cell tracings revealed that Nfatc1 was essential for establishment of the OFT mesenchymal boundary and suggest that Nfatc1 regulates OFT morphogenesis through EMT at pOFT and cardiac neural crest cell extension at dOFT.

Nfatc1 Regulates EMT Through Matrix Adhesiveness and Cell-Cell Contact

We then applied in vitro collagen gel assays to quantify Nfatc1 regulation of EMT. The pOFT explants from E10.5 hearts were dissected according to the anatomic bend at OFT to avoid contamination of the endocardium-derived mesenchyme by migratory cardiac neural crest–derived mesenchymal cells. Using Wnt1Cre;R26fslz embryos, we confirmed that the bend was a reliable landmark that separated the distal migratory neural crest cells from the proximal transforming endocardial cells in the OFT (Figure 4A). We first noticed poor adhesion of the Nfatc1−/− OFT explants to the collagen gels. In 4 different experiments, 20 (87%) of 23 Nfatc1+/+ OFT explants adhered to the collagen gel after a 24-hour incubation, whereas only 11 (52%) of 21 Nfatc1−/− OFT explants attached to the gel at the end of the incubation. A similar observation was made with E9.5 AVC explants. Among the attached explants, the average number of transformed cells from Nfatc1+/+ pOFT or AVC explants was 30 or 68, respectively. In contrast, in Nfatc1−/− pOFT or AVC explants, the number was increased to 54 (P=0.003) or 93 (P=0.005), respectively (Figures 4B through 4F). These results indicate that Nfatc1 regulates EMT by maintaining adhesion of endocardial cells to extracellular matrix or stabilizing endocardial cell-cell contacts, thus inhibiting EMT in the Nfatcl+/+ population of the endocardium.

Figure 4. In vitro collagen gel assays show that Nfatc1 inhibits EMT.

Figure 4

A, Schematic shows the landmark to dissect pOFT cushions from E10.5 Wnt1Cre;R26fslz embryos without contamination of invasive neural crest (blue staining) from the dOFT. B, Quantification analysis showed an increase in the number of transformed cells in Nfatc1−/− pOFT (n=11) or AVC (n=13) explants compared with Nfatc1+/+ pOFT (n=20) or AVC (n=29) explants (P=0.005). Student t test; bar=SD. CF, Photomicrographs show that Nfatc1+/+ endocardial cells migrate away from E10.5 OFT (C, D) or E9.5 AVC (E, F) explants but do not invade the gel as readily as Nfatc1−/− endocardial cells (arrowheads).

Nfatc1 Regulates EMT in a Cell-Autonomous Manner

We then used mouse blastocyst complement assay to determine whether the excessive EMT of Nfatc1−/− endocardial cells was the result of an intrinsic defect in these cells. Nfatc1−/− ES cells were microinjected into Zin40-lacZ–labeled Nfatc1+/+ blastocysts26,46 (Figure 5A). Chimeric embryos were harvested at E9.5 or E10.5 and analyzed by cross-section analysis after X-gal staining. LacZ-negative cells, derived from Nfatc1−/− ES cells, were found in both the endocardium and early mesenchyme of E9.5 AVC or E10.5 pOFT (Figures 5B through 5D), which indicates that Nfatc1 is not required for endocardial cell specification or the initiation of EMT. However, further assessment of the ratio of mesenchymal cells to endocardial cells revealed an enhanced EMT by the Nfatc1−/− cells (Figure 5E). In contrast, control blastocyst complementation experiments with wild-type ES cells showed no difference in EMT between endocardial cells derived from ES cells and blastocysts (data not shown). This observation demonstrates a cell-autonomous role for Nfatc1 in limiting EMT.

Nfatc1 Promotes Proliferation and Survival of Valve Endocardial Lineages

The hallmark of the cardiac phenotypes of Nfatc1−/− embryos is the absence of semilunar valve leaflets,24 which indicates that the extended endocardium-derived mesenchyme in the dOFT of E10.5 and E11.5 Nfatc1−/− embryos results in a defect in remodeling of the mesenchyme, poor outgrowth of Nfatc1h cells, or both. We thus examined cell proliferation and programmed cell death to determine whether they were affected in Nfatc1−/− embryos. By bromodeoxyuridine staining, we found a significant decrease in the proliferation of both endocardial cells and cushion mesenchyme at E11.5 in pOFT or AVC of Nfatc1−/− embryos (Figure 6). Between E12.5 and E13.5, the decreased proliferation of Nfatc1h endocardial cells in Nfatc1−/− embryos was more pronounced at the leading edge of the primitive semilunar valves, whereas in Nfatc1+/+ embryos, the outgrowth of Nfatc1h cells began to form primitive leaflets (Online Figure III, A and B). Programmed cell death was also determined by cleaved caspase 3 staining. We observed somewhat increased activated caspase 3 staining in the primitive semilunar valves of Nfatc1+/+ embryos after E12.5 (Online Figure III, C and D), although activated caspase 3 was not detected in either Nfatc1+/+ or Nfatc1−/− embryos at E10.5 or E11.5 (data not shown). Together, these data indicate that in addition to its inhibitory role in the EMT, Nfatc1 positively regulates valve elongation by promoting the proliferation of Nfatc1h cells and survival of valve mesenchymal cells.

Figure 6. Nfatc1 promotes the proliferation of the valve endocardial lineage.

Figure 6

A and C, Bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) antibody–stained E11.5 Nfatc1+/+ heart sections show BrdU+ endocardium-derived mesenchymal cells in pOFT (A; ★) and AVC (C; ★) and Nfatc1h cells (C; arrowheads). B and D, BrdU antibody–stained E11.5 Nfatc1−/− heart sections show fewer BrdU+ endocardium-derived mesenchymal cells in pOFT (B; ★) and AVC (D; ★). E and F, Quantitative analyses show a significant reduction in BrdU+ endocardial (E) and mesenchymal cells (F) of pOFT and AVC in E11.5 Nfatc1−/− heart. Serial sections from 4 paired E11.5 Nfatc1+/+ and Nfatc1−/− embryos were examined. Student t test; bar=SD.

Nfatc1 Regulates Expression of Genes Involved in EMT and Cell-Cell Contact

To further understand how Nfatc1 regulates endocardial cell fate, we developed an in vitro endocardial cell differentiation assay using an EPC line.47 In this assay, EPCs were able to differentiate into endothelial cells, which mainly consisted of Nfatc1-possitive endocardial cells. We used Nfatc1enlz as a marker for differentiation of Nfatc1h cells from EPCs. As expected, the number of Nfatc1h cells was increased in the culture and formed clusters within vessel-like lumens that were positive for Pecam1 expression (Figures 7A and 7B; data not shown). Accordingly, quantitative RT-PCR analyses showed a significant increase in Nfatc1, vascular endothelial cadherin (VE-Cad), and Pecam1 transcripts when EPCs undertook endocardial differentiation (Figure 7C). We then examined whether the expression of the key molecular regulators of EMT was affected in Nfatc1−/− hearts. Semi-quantitative RT-PCR analyses showed upregulation of Snail1 and especially Snail2, the transcriptional repressors of VE-Cad and EMT, and downregulation of their target, VE-Cad, in E10.5 Nfatc1−/− hearts (Figure 7D). Furthermore, immunostaining of Snail 2 revealed that its expression was upregulated in cushion endocardial and mesenchymal cells of E10.5 Nfatc1−/− embryos (Figures 7E and 7F). Together, the expression results indicate that Nfatc1 maintains endocardial phenotype by suppressing Snail2 expression.

Figure 7. Nfatc1 regulates expression of genes involved in EMT and cell-cell contact.

Figure 7

A and B, Photomicrographs of the in vitro endocardial cell differentiation assay using mouse EPCs show that differentiated Nfatc1h endocardial cells form clusters within vessel-like lumens positive for Pecam1 expression (arrows). C, Quantitative RT-PCR analyses show significantly increased expression of Nfatc1, VE-Cad, or Pecam1 transcripts when EPCs undertake endocardial differentiation. D, Semiquantitative RT-PCR analyses show marked upregulation of Snail1 and Snail2, the transcriptional repressors of VE-Cad and EMT, and downregulation of their target, VE-Cad, in E10.5 Nfatc1−/− hearts. E and F, Snail2 staining of sections of E10.5 Nfatc1+/+ (E) and Nfatc1−/− (F) shows the number of Snail2-expressing cells is increased in the endocardium (F; arrowheads) and cushion mesenchymal cells (F; ★) in Nfatc1−/− embryos.

Discussion

Two waves of Nfatc activities are required for valvulogenesis in mice, one in E9.5 myocardium for initiation of EMT and the other in E11.5 endocardium for valve elongation.41 Nfatc1 is expressed by the endocardium from the stage of the primary heart tube to the looping heart between E8.5 and E10.5.23,24 Subsequently, its expression is downregulated in the chamber endocardium but maintained at a high level in valve endocardial cells or Nfatc1h cells during EMT and valve elongation. We have previously shown that a tissue-specific enhancer autoamplifies Nfatc1 expression in Nfatc1h cells during EMT and subsequent growth of primitive valve leaflets.42 This enhancer activity corresponds to the second wave of calcineurin/Nfatc activity required for valve elongation.41

In the present study, we aimed to understand the role of Nfatc1h cells in EMT and valve elongation using a combination of genetic fate-mapping, loss-of-function, and blastocyst complementation approaches. We generated Nfatc1enCre mice to map the fate of Nfatc1h cells in the developing cushions and valves (Figure 1; Online Figure I) and control Nfatc1enlz mice as an indicator of Cre expression (Online Figure II). Comparisons of these new transgenic lines revealed that Nfatc1h cells do not undergo EMT; instead, they remain in the endocardium during EMT and valve elongation (Figures 1 and 2). Further fate-mapping analyses showed that OFT is not a continuous structure of a uniform mesenchymal cell population in mice; rather, OFT mesenchymal cell populations form a segmented structure, with cardiac neural crest mesenchyme occupying the dOFT and the endocardium-derived mesenchyme populating the pOFT (Figure 3). Their interface establishes the dOFT/pOFT mesenchymal border, which corresponds to the site for developing semilunar valves in humans.37,49

However, in Nfatc1−/− embryos that did not form semilunar valves, this tissue boundary was disrupted by an increased endocardium-derived mesenchyme and a decreased cardiac neural crest–derived mesenchyme. The observation indicates that the 2 mesenchymal populations must interact coordinately to give rise to the semilunar valves. In vitro collagen gel assays revealed a premature loss of cellular adhesiveness and excessive EMT by Nfatc1−/− endocardial cells (Figure 4), and blastocyst complementation confirmed enhanced EMT by Nfatc1−/− endocardial cells (Figure 5). In addition, Nfatc1 promotes endocardial and OFT mesenchymal proliferation during valve elongation (Figure 6). Augmented expression of Nfatc1 and other endothelial markers, including VE-Cad, correlated with endocardial cell differentiation from EPCs in vitro, and Nfatc1 suppressed expression of Snail1 and Snail2, thereby maintaining VE-Cad expression in vivo (Figure 7). Together, these results revealed a previously unknown cell-autonomous role for Nfatc1 as a key regulator of endocardial fate during EMT.

Although early neural crest migration was normal in Nfatc1−/− embryos, defects in its late migration or expansion were likely present in these embryos (Online Figure III). The defects appeared to affect a unique neural crest mesenchymal population essential for semilunar valve elongation and maturation.30,31 Thus, Nfatc1 may also regulate OFT morphogenesis and semilunar valve formation through an additional non–cell-autonomous effect on neural crest–derived mesenchymal function. The disruption of normal tissue boundary where semilunar valves develop in Nfatc1−/− embryos suggests that the proper spatiotemporal contact of endocardium-derived mesenchyme and neural crest–derived mesenchyme during early OFT morphogenesis is essential for subsequent semilunar valve remodeling. However, how this tissue interaction regulates development of semilunar valves is currently unclear.

We proposed such an interaction is determined, at least in part, by Nfatc1-enhancer–regulated valve endocardial cells (Figure 8A). During normal semilunar valve formation, a mixed endocardium- and neural crest–derived mesenchyme forms at approximately E11.5 in the OFT, immediately before valve elongation or remodeling begins. Nfatc1 regulates proper spatiotemporal contact between the 2 mesenchymal populations, which may be a prerequisite for valve elongation. Nfatc1 suppresses transcription of Snail1 and especially Snail2, thereby inhibiting EMT initiated by Snail1- and Snail2-dependent downregulation of VE-Cad5052 (Figure 8B). Furthermore, Nfatc1 also positively regulates the proliferation of valve endocardial cells necessary for the growth of valve leaflets. Loss of Nfatc1 results in increased EMT and depletion of the Nfatc1h valve endocardial population required for post-EMT valve elongation (Figures 3E and 8A). The expanded endocardium-derived mesenchyme may then replace the neural crest–derived mesenchyme also necessary for semilunar valve elongation and maturation.30,31

Figure 8. Working model for the role of Nfatc1 in semilunar valve development.

Figure 8

A, Diagram showing the role of Nfatc1 in defining valve mesenchymal interaction during semilunar valve morphogenesis. In E11.5 Nfatc1+/+ embryos, apposition of endocardium-derived mesenchyme from EMT at pOFT (blue cells) and cardiac neural crest–derived mesenchyme from migration at dOFT (green cells) establishes a mesenchymal tissue boundary for semilunar valve formation. From E11.5 to E12.5, the valve elongates from the boundary and becomes primitive valve leaflets. In Nfatc1−/− embryos, this tissue boundary is shifted into the dOFT because of an increased endocardium-derived mesenchyme from augmented EMT in the pOFT and subsequently decreased neural crest–derived mesenchyme in the dOFT. The alteration of heterogeneous mesenchymal tissue populations (and reduced valve endocardial proliferation not shown in the model) disrupts post-EMT valve elongation. B, A simple diagram shows that Nfatc1 transcriptionally regulates EMT and valve endocardial cell proliferation. Nfatc1 maintains an endocardial cell phenotype through suppression of expression of Snail1 and Sanil2, thereby maintaining the VE-Cad expression necessary for a tight cell-cell contact of the valve endocardial cells that prevents them from undergoing EMT. Nfatc1 also positively regulates the proliferation of valve endocardial cells necessary for the growth of valve leaflets mediated by unknown factors.

The present study identifies a previously unknown function of Nfatc1 in endocardial cell-fate decision making in the allocation of endocardial cells to EMT and post-EMT valve elongation. Inhibition of EMT by Nfatc1 is required for proper contact between endocardium- and neural crest–derived mesenchymal cells and subsequent valve elongation. These findings suggest that mutations in NFATC1 may underlie human congenital heart valve disease.

Supplementary Material

Novelty and Significance.

What Is Known?

  • During development, the semilunar valves are generated by cells of endocardial and cardiac neural crest lineages.

  • Endocardial to mesenchymal transformation (EMT) and cardiac neural crest cell migration are involved in semilunar valve formation.

  • Nfatc1 (nuclear factors of activated T cells, cytoplasmic 1) is required for semilunar valve formation.

  • Nfatc1 expression is restricted to endocardial cells.

  • A transcription enhancer regulates high Nfatc1 expression in valve endocardial cells.

What New Information Does This Article Contribute?

  • Proper contact between endocardium- and cardiac neural crest–derived mesenchymal cells precedes normal elongation of semilunar valves.

  • A previously unidentified population of valve endocardial cell does not undergo EMT during valve formation.

  • Nfatc1 plays an important role in maintaining endocardial cell fate during EMT.

  • NFATC1 is a candidate gene for human congenital heart valve disease.

Congenital heart valve defects are a major cause of perinatal and neonatal mortality and morbidity. EMT generates heart valve mesenchyme and thus plays a critical role in the formation of heart valves. Expression of Nfatc1 is restricted to the valve endocardial endocardium during valve development through a tissue-specific enhancer. To address its potential role in endocardial cell-fate decision making during EMT, we generated a novel valve endocardial cell–specific Cre mouse line for fate-mapping analyses of valve endocardial cells. We also performed in vivo loss-of-function and blastocyst complementation, in vitro EMT, and endocardial cell differentiation assays, as well as gene expression studies. The results from these experiments showed that valve endocardial cells marked by the Nfatc1 enhancer did not undergo EMT and remained within the endocardium as a proliferative population to support post-EMT valve elongation. Nfatc1 inhibits EMT in a cell-autonomous manner by suppressing transcription of Snail1 and Snail2, the key transcriptional factors for the initiation of EMT. These studies reveal a previously unknown function of Nfatc1 in endocardial cell-fate decision making in allocating the endocardial cells to EMT and post-EMT valve elongation, and they identify NFATC1 as a candidate gene for human congenital heart valve disease.

Acknowledgments

Sources of Funding

This work was supported by grants from the American Heart Association (0435128N) and National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health (NHLB/NIH; HL07881, HL07881S, and HL104441) (B.Z.); grants from the March of Dimes (FY07-513) and NHLB/NIH (RL1HL0952551) (H.S.B.); and a U01 grant from NHLB/NIH (HL100398) (A.K.H).

Non-standard Abbreviations and Acronyms

AVC

atrioventricular canal

dOFT

distal outflow tract

EMT

endocardial to mesenchymal transformation

Nfatc1

nuclear factor of activated T cells, cytoplasmic 1

Nfatc1enCre

Nfatc1-enhancer Cre

Nfatc1h

Nfatc1 high expression

pOFT

proximal outflow tract

Footnotes

Disclosures

None.

References

  • 1.Fedak PW, Verma S, David TE, Leask RL, Weisel RD, Butany J. Clinical and pathophysiological implications of a bicuspid aortic valve. Circulation. 2002;106:900–904. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000027905.26586.e8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Delot EC. Control of endocardial cushion and cardiac valve maturation by BMP signaling pathways. Mol Genet Metab. 2003;80:27–35. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2003.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Eisenberg LM, Markwald RR. Molecular regulation of atrioventricular valvuloseptal morphogenesis. Circ Res. 1995;77:1–6. doi: 10.1161/01.res.77.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Barnett JV, Desgrosellier JS. Early events in valvulogenesis: a signaling perspective. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today. 2003;69:58–72. doi: 10.1002/bdrc.10006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Schroeder JA, Jackson LF, Lee DC, Camenisch TD. Form and function of developing heart valves: coordination by extracellular matrix and growth factor signaling. J Mol Med. 2003;81:392–403. doi: 10.1007/s00109-003-0456-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Person AD, Klewer SE, Runyan RB. Cell biology of cardiac cushion development. Int Rev Cytol. 2005;243:287–335. doi: 10.1016/S0074-7696(05)43005-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Krug EL, Mjaatvedt CH, Markwald RR. Extracellular matrix from embryonic myocardium elicits an early morphogenetic event in cardiac endothelial differentiation. Dev Biol. 1987;120:348–355. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(87)90237-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Mjaatvedt CH, Lepera RC, Markwald RR. Myocardial specificity for initiating endothelial-mesenchymal cell transition in embryonic chick heart correlates with a particulate distribution of fibronectin. Dev Biol. 1987;119:59–67. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(87)90206-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Rezaee M, Isokawa K, Halligan N, Markwald RR, Krug EL. Identification of an extracellular 130-kDa protein involved in early cardiac morphogenesis. J Biol Chem. 1993;268:14404–14411. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mjaatvedt CH, Markwald RR. Induction of an epithelial-mesenchymal transition by an in vivo adheron-like complex. Dev Biol. 1989;136:118–128. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(89)90135-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Nakajima Y, Yamagishi T, Nakamura H, Markwald RR, Krug EL. An autocrine function for transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta3 in the transformation of atrioventricular canal endocardium into mesenchyme during chick heart development. Dev Biol. 1998;194:99–113. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1997.8807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ramsdell AF, Markwald RR. Induction of endocardial cushion tissue in the avian heart is regulated, in part, by TGFbeta-3-mediated autocrine signaling. Dev Biol. 1997;188:64–74. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1997.8637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Camenisch TD, Molin DG, Person A, Runyan RB, Gittenberger-de Groot AC, McDonald JA, Klewer SE. Temporal and distinct TGFbeta ligand requirements during mouse and avian endocardial cushion morphogenesis. Dev Biol. 2002;248:170–181. doi: 10.1006/dbio.2002.0731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Nakajima Y, Yamagishi T, Hokari S, Nakamura H. Mechanisms involved in valvuloseptal endocardial cushion formation in early cardiogenesis: roles of transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta and bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) Anat Rec. 2000;258:119–127. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0185(20000201)258:2<119::AID-AR1>3.0.CO;2-U. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sugi Y, Ito N, Szebenyi G, Myers K, Fallon JF, Mikawa T, Markwald RR. Fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-4 can induce proliferation of cardiac cushion mesenchymal cells during early valve leaflet formation. Dev Biol. 2003;258:252–263. doi: 10.1016/s0012-1606(03)00099-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kisanuki YY, Hammer RE, Miyazaki J, Williams SC, Richardson JA, Yanagisawa M. Tie2-Cre transgenic mice: a new model for endothelial cell-lineage analysis in vivo. Dev Biol. 2001;230:230–242. doi: 10.1006/dbio.2000.0106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.de Lange FJ, Moorman AF, Anderson RH, Manner J, Soufan AT, de Gier-de Vries C, Schneider MD, Webb S, van den Hoff MJ, Christoffels VM. Lineage and morphogenetic analysis of the cardiac valves. Circ Res. 2004;95:645–654. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000141429.13560.cb. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Nakajima Y, Krug EL, Markwald RR. Myocardial regulation of transforming growth factor-beta expression by outflow tract endothelium in the early embryonic chick heart. Dev Biol. 1994;165:615–626. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1994.1280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Galvin KM, Donovan MJ, Lynch CA, Meyer RI, Paul RJ, Lorenz JN, Fairchild-Huntress V, Dixon KL, Dunmore JH, Gimbrone MA, Jr, Falb D, Huszar D. A role for smad6 in development and homeostasis of the cardiovascular system. Nat Genet. 2000;24:171–174. doi: 10.1038/72835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bartram U, Molin DG, Wisse LJ, Mohamad A, Sanford LP, Doetschman T, Speer CP, Poelmann RE, Gittenberger-de Groot AC. Double-outlet right ventricle and overriding tricuspid valve reflect disturbances of looping, myocardialization, endocardial cushion differentiation, and apoptosis in TGF-beta(2)-knockout mice. Circulation. 2001;103:2745–2752. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.103.22.2745. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Delot EC, Bahamonde ME, Zhao M, Lyons KM. BMP signaling is required for septation of the outflow tract of the mammalian heart. Development. 2003;130:209–220. doi: 10.1242/dev.00181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Schilham MW, Oosterwegel MA, Moerer P, Ya J, de Boer PA, van de Wetering M, Verbeek S, Lamers WH, Kruisbeek AM, Cumano A, Clevers H. Defects in cardiac outflow tract formation and pro-B-lymphocyte expansion in mice lacking Sox-4. Nature. 1996;380:711–714. doi: 10.1038/380711a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.de la Pompa JL, Timmerman LA, Takimoto H, Yoshida H, Elia AJ, Samper E, Potter J, Wakeham A, Marengere L, Langille BL, Crabtree GR, Mak TW. Role of the NF-ATc transcription factor in morphogenesis of cardiac valves and septum. Nature. 1998;392:182–186. doi: 10.1038/32419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ranger AM, Grusby MJ, Hodge MR, Gravallese EM, de la Brousse FC, Hoey T, Mickanin C, Baldwin HS, Glimcher LH. The transcription factor NF-ATc is essential for cardiac valve formation. Nature. 1998;392:186–190. doi: 10.1038/32426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Chen B, Bronson RT, Klaman LD, Hampton TG, Wang JF, Green PJ, Magnuson T, Douglas PS, Morgan JP, Neel BG. Mice mutant for Egfr and Shp2 have defective cardiac semilunar valvulogenesis. Nat Genet. 2000;24:296–299. doi: 10.1038/73528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Gitler AD, Zhu Y, Ismat FA, Lu MM, Yamauchi Y, Parada LF, Epstein JA. Nf1 has an essential role in endothelial cells. Nat Genet. 2003;33:75–79. doi: 10.1038/ng1059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Jackson LF, Qiu TH, Sunnarborg SW, Chang A, Zhang C, Patterson C, Lee DC. Defective valvulogenesis in HB-EGF and TACE-null mice is associated with aberrant BMP signaling. EMBO J. 2003;22:2704–2716. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdg264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Takamura K, Okishima T, Ohdo S, Hayakawa K. Association of cephalic neural crest cells with cardiovascular development, particularly that of the semilunar valves. Anat Embryol (Berl) 1990;182:263–272. doi: 10.1007/BF00185519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Poelmann RE, Mikawa T, Gittenberger-de Groot AC. Neural crest cells in outflow tract septation of the embryonic chicken heart: differentiation and apoptosis. Dev Dyn. 1998;212:373–384. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0177(199807)212:3<373::AID-AJA5>3.0.CO;2-E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.High FA, Jain R, Stoller JZ, Antonucci NB, Lu MM, Loomes KM, Kaestner KH, Pear WS, Epstein JA. Murine Jagged1/Notch signaling in the second heart field orchestrates Fgf8 expression and tissue-tissue interactions during outflow tract development. J Clin Invest. 2009;119:1986–1996. doi: 10.1172/JCI38922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Jain R, Engleka KA, Rentschler SL, Manderfield LJ, Li L, Yuan L, Epstein JA. Cardiac neural crest orchestrates remodeling and functional maturation of mouse semilunar valves. J Clin Invest. 2011;121:422–430. doi: 10.1172/JCI44244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Baldwin HS, Lloyd TR, Solursh M. Hyaluronate degradation affects ventricular function of the early postlooped embryonic rat heart in situ. Circ Res. 1994;74:244–252. doi: 10.1161/01.res.74.2.244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Jiang X, Rowitch DH, Soriano P, McMahon AP, Sucov HM. Fate of the mammalian cardiac neural crest. Development. 2000;127:1607–1616. doi: 10.1242/dev.127.8.1607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Li J, Chen F, Epstein JA. Neural crest expression of Cre recombinase directed by the proximal Pax3 promoter in transgenic mice. Genesis. 2000;26:162–164. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1526-968x(200002)26:2<162::aid-gene21>3.0.co;2-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Hurle JM, Colvee E, Blanco AM. Development of mouse semilunar valves. Anat Embryol. 1980;160:83–91. doi: 10.1007/BF00315651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Pexieder T. Development of the outflow tract of the embryonic heart. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser. 1978;14:29–68. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Anderson RH, Webb S, Brown NA, Lamers W, Moorman A. Development of the heart: (3) formation of the ventricular outflow tracts, arterial valves, and intrapericardial arterial trunks. Heart. 2003;89:1110–1118. doi: 10.1136/heart.89.9.1110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Armstrong EJ, Bischoff J. Heart valve development: endothelial cell signaling and differentiation. Circ Res. 2004;95:459–470. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000141146.95728.da. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Butcher JT, Markwald RR. Valvulogenesis: the moving target. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2007;362:1489–1503. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2007.2130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Combs MD, Yutzey KE. Heart valve development: regulatory networks in development and disease. Circ Res. 2009;105:408–421. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.109.201566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Chang CP, Neilson JR, Bayle JH, Gestwicki JE, Kuo A, Stankunas K, Graef IA, Crabtree GR. A field of myocardial-endocardial NFAT signaling underlies heart valve morphogenesis. Cell. 2004;118:649–663. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Zhou B, Wu B, Tompkins KL, Boyer KL, Grindley JC, Baldwin HS. Characterization of Nfatc1 regulation identifies an enhancer required for gene expression that is specific to pro-valve endocardial cells in the developing heart. Development. 2005;132:1137–1146. doi: 10.1242/dev.01640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Zhou B, Cron RQ, Wu B, Genin A, Wang Z, Liu S, Robson P, Baldwin HS. Regulation of the murine Nfatc1 gene by NFATc2. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:10704–10711. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M107068200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Asagiri M, Sato K, Usami T, Ochi S, Nishina H, Yoshida H, Morita I, Wagner EF, Mak TW, Serfling E, Takayanagi H. Autoamplification of NFATc1 expression determines its essential role in bone homeostasis. J Exp Med. 2005;202:1261–1269. doi: 10.1084/jem.20051150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Ranger AM, Hodge MR, Gravallese EM, Oukka M, Davidson L, Alt FW, de la Brousse FC, Hoey T, Grusby M, Glimcher LH. Delayed lymphoid repopulation with defects in IL-4-driven responses produced by inactivation of NF-ATc. Immunity. 1998;8:125–134. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(00)80465-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Munsie M, Peura T, Michalska A, Trounson A, Mountford P. Novel method for demonstrating nuclear contribution in mouse nuclear transfer. Reprod Fertil Dev. 1998;10:633–637. doi: 10.1071/rd98098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Hatzopoulos AK, Folkman J, Vasile E, Eiselen GK, Rosenberg RD. Isolation and characterization of endothelial progenitor cells from mouse embryos. Development. 1998;125:1457–1468. doi: 10.1242/dev.125.8.1457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Jiang X, Choudhary B, Merki E, Chien KR, Maxson RE, Sucov HM. Normal fate and altered function of the cardiac neural crest cell lineage in retinoic acid receptor mutant embryos. Mech Dev. 2002;117:115–122. doi: 10.1016/s0925-4773(02)00206-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Thompson RP, Sumida H, Abercrombie V, Satow Y, Fitzharris TP, Okamoto N. Morphogenesis of human cardiac outflow. Anat Rec. 1985;213:578–586. doi: 10.1002/ar.1092130414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Luna-Zurita L, Prados B, Grego-Bessa J, Luxan G, del Monte G, Benguria A, Adams RH, Perez-Pomares JM, de la Pompa JL. Integration of a Notch-dependent mesenchymal gene program and Bmp2-driven cell invasiveness regulates murine cardiac valve formation. J Clin Invest. 2010;120:3493–3507. doi: 10.1172/JCI42666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Niessen K, Fu Y, Chang L, Hoodless PA, McFadden D, Karsan A. Slug is a direct Notch target required for initiation of cardiac cushion cellularization. J Cell Biol. 2008;182:315–325. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200710067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Mercado-Pimentel ME, Hubbard AD, Runyan RB. Endoglin and Alk5 regulate epithelial-mesenchymal transformation during cardiac valve formation. Dev Biol. 2007;304:420–432. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.12.038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

RESOURCES