Summary
Background
The stromal reaction may be one of the key factors in the development of breast carcinomas.
Case Report
We report the case of an 80-year-old female patient who ignored a very slow growing, extensive scirrhous breast carcinoma for almost 20 years duration.
Results
Histopathology analysis revealed a Scarff Bloom Richardson (SBR)3-grade, estrogen receptor (ER)-positive (80%), progesterone receptor (PR)-positive (10%), HER2/neu-negative, lobular-invasive, scirrhous breast carcinoma with large cells.
Conclusion
A strong peritumoral fibrous stromal reaction may explain the longstanding evolution of the tumor without any distant metastases.
Key words: Breast Cancer: scirrhous, Lobular
Zusammenfassung
Hintergrund
Die Stromareaktion könnte ais einer der Schlüsselfaktoren bei der Entwicklung von Brustkarzinomen angesehen werden.
Fallbericht
Wir berichten vom Fall einer 80-jährigen Patientin, die ein sehr langsam wachsendes, ausgedehntes szirrhöses Brustkarzinom über einen Zeitraum von fast 20 Jahren ignorierte.
Ergebnisse
Die histopathologische Analyse zeigte ein Scarff-Bloom-Richardson (SRB) Grad 3, Östrogenrezep-tor (ER)-positives (80%), Progesteronrezeptor (PR)-positives (10%), HER2/neu-negatives, lobulärinvasives, szirrhöses Brustkarzinom mit großen Zellen.
Schlussfolgerung
Eine starke peritumorale, fibrotische Stromareaktion könnte die lang andauernde Entwicklung des Tumors ohne Bildung entfernter Metastasen erklären.
Introduction
An 80-year-old female patient presented with a right breast retraction consistent with a large, hard and fibrous carcinoma, the so-called ‘cancer en cuirasse’ (fig. 1) [1]. At actual presentation, long-standing permeative nodules surrounded the primary breast tumor and enlarged ipsilateral axillary lymph nodes were found. The onset of symptoms had started 20 years before, but the patient had ignored the progression of the slow-growing local tumor. Histopathology analysis revealed a Scarff Bloom Richardson (SBR)3-grade, estrogen receptor (ER)-positive (80%), progesterone receptor (PR)-positive (10%), HER2/neu-negative lobular-invasive scirrhous breast carcinoma with large cells (fig. 2).
Fig. 1.

Scirrhous breast cancer called ‘cancer en cuirasse’. An 80-yearold woman presenting with global breast retraction and biopsy-proven malignant permeative nodules on the overlying skin (arrows).
Fig. 2.

Histological section of the breast specimen (hematoxylin-eosin stain, × 200). The histological section shows clusters of tumoral cells surrounded by dense extensive fibrous stroma rich in collagen fibers (arrows) and the presence of few fibroblasts.
A whole-body multidetector computed tomography (CT) examination confirmed the presence of right axillary adenopathies with no distant metastasis. Skin retraction was shown overlying a 200 × 150 mm tumor, at clinical inspection and on 3-dimensional breast CT reformation scans (fig. 3).
Fig. 3.

3-Dimensional multidetector CT reformation of the right breast. Volume-rendering, CT scan reformation clearly shows the strong fibrous skin/nipple retraction and enlarged veins at the periphery. Despite the invasion of the whole mammary gland and the areolar plaque involvement, neither internal thoracic adenopathy nor distant metastases were depicted on the total-body CT scan, 20 years after initial clinical presentation.
Discussion
Scirrhous (etymology: Greek, skirrhos, hard) carcinomas are histologically characterized by the presence of hard, fibrous, particularly invasive tumors in which the malignant cells occur singly or in small clusters or strands in dense connective tissue [1]. Such types of breast carcinomas are mostly reported in elderly women and may indicate slow-growing tumors leading to limited local invasion and few distant metastases [2, 3]. Scirrhous carcinomas are usually ductal carcinomas whereas scirrhous lobular types have been reported very rarely [4].
The so-called ‘cancer en cuirasse’ reflects the strong extensive fibrotic process that causes the chest wall encasement as a breastplate would do [2, 5]. Stromal reaction in cancer has been interpreted as either promoting tumor angiogenesis and physical fibrillar matrix components or creating a barrier to entrap the tumor.
Breast fibromatosis is an uncommon differential diagnosis to consider in such a case, as it may simulate breast carcinoma. Fibromatosis of the breast consists in benign infiltrative proliferation of fibrous tissue [6]; similarly, Riedel thyroiditis in the neck is a differential diagnosis of thyroid cancer [7]. Some authors reported an improved clinical outcome in scirrhous carcinoma presenting with stromal reaction associated with desmoid-type fibromatosis (DTF), while others presenting with a solitary fibroblastic fibrous tumor displayed a poor prognosis [8, 9]. The DTF core gene set has thus been reported as a robust descriptor of a distinct stromal response, being associated with improved clinical outcome in breast cancer patients. Thus, not all fibrosis types appear to be equivalent.
Although such a dense fibrous stromal reaction may reflect a slow-growing tumor [8, 10, 11, 12], scirrhous breast carcinomas would be older than other kinds of tumors and thus may have a poorer prognosis [121. However, according to the literature, the definition of scirrhous carcinoma warrants further redefinition or correction as this term is overused because any cancer may present with a stellar stromal reaction. We do state that the term of scirrhous carcinoma should be limited to cancers presenting with an intense stromal reaction and a low cellularity [1].
As a matter of fact, Baltzer et al. [13] reported on a case of large invasive breast carcinoma with absence of contrast medium enhancement on the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan due to an almost missing tumor angiogenesis. This carcinoma had a low cellularity and a strong desmo-plastic reaction. We believe that, in such a genuine scirrhous cancer, the strong desmoplastic reaction may preclude local angiogenesis, thus explaining a lower contrast uptake on CT scan perfusion [14] and a subsequent very slow local tumor growth. Furthermore, Masamune et al. [15] reported a relationship between poor angiogenesis-related hypoxia and the development of fibrosis in pancreatic cancer. Moreover, as stated by Rhee [16], a stiff restrained matrix provides a high tension state, besides cytoskeletal reorganization. This phenomenon is analogous to granulation tissue and wound contraction that induce stress fiber formation and focal adhesion and thus would limit tumor growth.
Angiogenesis is a complex, multistep process driven by many local signals within the tumor. Tumor cells stimulate the formation of stroma, which excretes a variety of growth factors, cytokines, and proteases. Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) are major components of the tumor stromal matrix that may elicit diverse aspects of tumor growth as either positive or negative regulators [17, 18, 19]. In breast carcinoma, large numbers of infiltrating T cells and TAMs are often observed. Macrophage infiltration into tumors is regulated by several cytokines and chemokines, in particular macrophage chemo-attractant protein-1 (MCP-1). MCP-1 is produced not only by tumor cells but also by stromal cells. Although high concentrations of TAMs may correlate with poor prognosis, MCP-1 may activate monocyte cytostatic function against tumor cells [20]. Finally, mammary adipose tissue-derived stem cells (ASCs) that locate adjacent to the breast tumor may incorporate into tumor vessels and differentiate into endothelial cells, thus leading to tumor growth and metastasis [21]. In our case, we hypothesize that the fibrous stroma had inhibited the tumor cell spread by the secretion of MCP-1 or by cytostatic cytokines/chemokines and precluded vessel incorporation of ASCs for almost 20 years.
Conclusions
In conclusion, the very slow local tumor progression reported herein may be partly due to its estrogen dependency (post-menopausal status), but above all to the combined strong stromal reaction and the tumor cell hypoxia. This precluded stromal angiogenesis and may explain such a long-standing evolution despite a high SBR histological grade (3). Moreover, in situ production of cytostatic agents such as MCP-1 may have inhibited malignant breast cell growth for almost 20 years. A better understanding of stromal contributions to cancer progression will likely increase our knowledge of the combinatorial signals that support and promote tumor growth, and eventually result in the designation of new therapeutics targeting the stroma in breast cancer patients.
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no sponsorship or funding arrangements relating to the article ‘Long-Standing Scirrhous Breast Carcinoma en Cuirasse’ and no possible conflicts of interest to disclose.
References
- 1.Page DL, Anderson TJ. Diagnostic histopathology of the breast. New York: Churchhill Livingstone; 1987. pp. 193–197. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Graham Little EG. General carcinomatous infiltration of the skin of arm (cancer en cuirasse), apparently resulting from an X-ray burn in treatment of an indolent breast scirrhus. Proc R Soc Med. 1916;9:74–76. doi: 10.1177/003591571600900336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.MacNamara NC. Abstract of clinical lectures on carcinomas of the breast which require an operation. Br Med J. 1888;1:1046–1047. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Arnott EJ, Greaves DP. Metastases in the orbit. Br J Ophthalmol. 1965;49:43–45. doi: 10.1136/bjo.49.1.43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Gray HT, Morton R. Case of carcinoma en cuirasse, treated by X-rays. Proc R Soc Med. 1921;14:25–27. doi: 10.1177/003591572101400212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Somerville JE, Biggart JD. Fibromatosis of the breast: a benign lesion which simulates a carcinoma. Ulster Med J. 1989;58:97–99. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Papi G, LiVolsi VA. Current concepts on Riedel thyroiditis. Am J Clin Pathol. 2004;121(suppl):S50–S63. doi: 10.1309/NUU88VAFR9YEHKNA. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Beck AH, Espinosa I, Gilks CB, van de Rijn M, West RB. The fibromatosis signature defines a robust stromal response in breast carcinoma. Lab Invest. 2008;88:591–601. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.2008.31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.West RB, Nuyten DS, Subramanian S, Nielsen TO, Corless CL, Rubin BP, Montgomery K, Zhu S, Patel R, Hernandez-Boussard T, Goldblum JR, Brown PO, van de Vijver M, van de Rijn M. Determination of stromal signatures in breast carcinoma. PLoS Biol. 2005;3:el87. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Meyer JE, Kopans DB. Stability of a mammographie mass: a false sense of security. Am J Roentgenol. 1981;137:595–598. doi: 10.2214/ajr.137.3.595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Rosen EL, Baker JA, Soo MS. Malignant lesions initially subjected to short-term mammographie follow-up. Radiology. 2002;223:221–228. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2231011355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Anastassiades OT, Pryce DM. Fibrosis as in indication of time in infiltrating breast cancer and its importance in prognosis. Br J Cancer. 1974;29:232–239. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1974.62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Baltzer PA, Benndorf M, Gajda M, Kaiser WA. An exception to tumour neoangiogenesis in a malignant breast-lesion. Breast J. 2009;16:197–198. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2009.00875.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hirasawa H, Tsushima Y, Hirasawa S, Takei H, Taketomi-Takahasi A, Takano A, Amanuma M, Endo K. Perfusion CT of breast carcinoma: arterial perfusion of nonscirrhous carcinoma was higher than that of scirrhous carcinoma. Acad Radiol. 2007;14:547–552. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2007.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Masamune A, Kikuta K, Watanabe T, Satoh K, Hirota M, Shimosegawa T. Hypoxia stimulates pancreatic stellate cells to induce fibrosis and angiogenesis in pancreatic cancer. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2008;295:G709–G717. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.90356.2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Rhee S. Fibroblasts in three dimensional matrices: cell migration and matrix remodeling. Exp Mol Med. 2009;41:858–865. doi: 10.3858/emm.2009.41.12.096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Mantovani A, Bottazzi B, Colotta F, Sozzani S, Ruco L. The origin and function of tumor-associated macrophages. Immunol Today. 1992;13:265–270. doi: 10.1016/0167-5699(92)90008-U. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lee AHS, Happerfield LC, Bobrow LG, Millis RR. Angiogenesis and inflammation in invasive carcinoma of breast. J Clin Pathol. 1997;50:669–673. doi: 10.1136/jcp.50.8.669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Van Netten JP, George EJ, Ashmead BJ, Fletcher C, Thorton IG, Coy P. Macrophage-tumor cell associations in breast cancer. Lancet. 1993;342:872–873. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ghilardi G, Biondi ML, La Torre A, Battaglioli L, Scorza R. Breast cancer progression and host polymorphisms in the chemokine system: role of the macrophage chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) -2518 G alíele. Clin Chem. 2005;51:452–455. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2004.041657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Muehlberg FL, Song YH, Krohn A, Pinilla SP, Droll LH, Leng X, Seidensticker M, Ricke J, Altman AM, Devarajan E, Liu W, Arlinghaus RB, Alt EU. Tissue-resident stem cells promote breast cancer growth and metastasis. Carcinogenesis. 2009;30:589–597. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgp036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
