Skip to main content
Transfusion Medicine and Hemotherapy logoLink to Transfusion Medicine and Hemotherapy
. 2011 Jan 31;38(1):8–18. doi: 10.1159/000324160

Pathogen Reduction Technology Treatment of Platelets, Plasma and Whole Blood Using Riboflavin and UV Light

Susanne Marschner 1,*, Raymond Goodrich 1
PMCID: PMC3132976  PMID: 21779202

Summary

Bacterial contamination and emerging infections combined with increased international travel pose a great risk to the safety of the blood supply. Tests to detect the presence of infection in a donor have a ‘window period’ during which infections cannot be detected but the donor may be infectious. Agents and their transmission routes need to be recognized before specific tests can be developed. Pathogen reduction of blood components represents a means to address these concerns and is a proactive approach for the prevention of transfusion-transmitted diseases. The expectation of a pathogen reduction system is that it achieves high enough levels of pathogen reduction to reduce or prevent the likelihood of disease transmission while preserving adequate cell and protein quality. In addition the system needs to be non-toxic, non-mutagenic and should be simple to use. The Mirasol® Pathogen Reduction Technology (PRT) System for Platelets and Plasma uses riboflavin (vitamin B2) plus UV light to induce damage in nucleic acid-containing agents. The system has been shown to be effective against clinically relevant pathogens and inactivates leukocytes without significantly compromising the efficacy of the product or resulting in product loss. Riboflavin is a naturally occurring vitamin with a well-known and well-characterized safety profile. The same methodology is currently under development for the treatment of whole blood, making pathogen reduction of all blood products using one system achievable. This review gives an overview of the Mirasol PRT System, summarizing the mechanism of action, toxicology profile, pathogen reduction performance and clinical efficacy of the process.

Keywords: Pathogen reduction, Riboflavin, Transfusion safety

Introduction

Blood has a vital role in the human body, and blood transfusion can be life-saving in patients with either massive blood loss or in those unable to produce blood due to defective hematopoiesis. In most developed countries blood is fractionated into components like fresh frozen plasma (FFP), platelets and red cells concentrate for replacement or prophylactic therapies. A number of measures have been introduced in the past decade to prevent transmission of infectious agents during transfusion of blood components. Donor screening and deferral procedures in addition to serologic and nucleic acid testing helped in making blood a safer product for transfusion [1]. These efforts have drastically reduced the risk of classical transfusion-transmitted infectious agents such as HBV, HCV and HIV. However, even though screening techniques are a very reliable way to detect many lethal viruses, blood transfusion still poses risks for the following reasons: i) the window period of pathogens during which an infectious donor cannot be detected has been reduced, but not eliminated by NAT screening because NAT testing is generally carried out on pooled donor samples which can raise the chance of infection due to dilution of the signal from infected donors; ii) new emerging pathogens may enter the blood supply; iii) parasites and bacteria also represent an infective risk. Routine serological testing currently does not test for various parasitic diseases, and limited test methods exist [2]. Bacteria may be present in asymptomatic donors or, more frequently, enter the blood during collection. Efforts to reduce the risk of bacterial contamination of platelet products is of high importance since platelets are stored at room temperature, allowing for bacterial proliferation, and also because platelets are frequently given to patients with impaired immune systems who are more susceptible to bacterial infections. In developing countries the risk of all transfusion-transmitted infections is still high due to insufficient funding and organization of health services.

Methods aimed at reducing the pathogen load in labile blood products have been developed in recent years and are aimed at further reducing the risk of transmission of pathogens and adverse events. Targeting of nucleic acids has been the primary approach to inactivate pathogens and donor leukocytes in cellular blood products. This review provides an overview of the Mirasol® Pathogen Reduction Technology (PRT) System for Platelets and Plasma (CaridianBCT Biotechnologies, Lakewood, CO, USA) and describes the Mirasol System for Whole Blood currently in development. The mechanism of action, toxicology profile, pathogen reduction performance and clinical efficacy of treated products are discussed.

Mirasol PRT System

Mechanisms of Action

The ability of riboflavin (RB), vitamin B2, to act as a photo-sensitizer mediates selective damage to nucleic acids upon exposure to light, without binding to cells and proteins [3]. RB associates with nucleic acids and mediates an oxygen-independent electron transfer process leading to the modification of nucleic acids, primarily on guanine residues, and the conversion of RB to its photoproduct lumichrome (LC) [4, 5, 6, 7, 8]. Compared to the use of UV light alone, which causes reversible nucleic acid damage, damage induced by RB is irreversible since replication and repair processes are impaired due to the guanine base modification [9]. The number of lesions occur at a frequency of approximately one in every 350 base pairs (bp) [10]. Nucleic acid damage may be less frequent in mitochondrial DNA as shown by Janetzko et al. [11]. Mitochondrial DNA isolated from Mirasol-treated platelets could be amplified using 1 kb but not 4 kb primers.

Martin et al. [12] evaluated the effectiveness of RB inactivation of phage as a function of wavelength of light. At most of the wavelengths examined, the ability of RB to inactivate virus followed the absorption pattern of RB in aqueous media. For wavelengths of 310–320 nm, where the absorbance of RB in water is decreasing, the inactivation of the virus was increased, enhancing the levels of pathogen inactivation compared to the use of UV light alone. Based on this work the Mirasol system was designed to use RB at a final concentration of approximately 50 μmol/l and UV light from a fluorescent lamp with the energy centered at 313 nm. The majority (99%) of the total energy reaching the product through the plastic is in the UVB (280-315 nm) and UVA (315-400 nm) spectral regions. The peak wavelength chosen for the Mirasol process preferentially targets RB associated with nucleic acids, directing the damage specifically to nucleic acids. This light source does not emit energy in spectral regions where cytochrome C, flavin mononucleotides (FMN) and flavin adenine dinucleotides (FAD) absorb – co-factors that are essential for mitochondrial function and activity.

Toxicology and Safety

RB is a water soluble, rapidly excreted vitamin that cannot be stored by the body. It is the precursor for FMN and FAD, major co-enzymes that participate in one-electron transfer processes in the human body. It is classified by the Food and Drug Administration as a Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) product (21 CFR 184, 1695, 2001). The safety of RB has been demonstrated for oral, subcutaneous, intraperitoneal and intravenous routes of administration [13, 14, 15, 16]. Neonates undergoing phototherapy for neonatal jaundice are often temporarily RB-deficient due to the overlapping light absorption spectra of RB and bilirubin [17, 18, 19, 20]. Although concerns were expressed about the long-term effects of RB plus direct phototherapy in neonates [8], there have been no reports of adverse events in the clinical setting. Indeed, a large retrospective analysis of over 55,000 infants who had undergone phototherapy demonstrated no excess incidence of childhood leukemias over an average of 9 years of follow-up [21].

In the Mirasol process 35 ml of RB (500 μmol/l in 0.9% saline) is added to products before exposure to UV light. Photolysis of RB results in the formation of LC, 2′-ketoriboflavin, 4′-ketoriboflavin and formylmethylflavin. These photoproducts are normal metabolites of RB and have been detected in normal non-illuminated human blood at low concentrations [22], showing that no new chemicals are introduced into blood products by this RB-based PRT system. Normal levels of RB in human blood range from 100 to 400 ng/ml (equivalent to 0.5–2 mg assuming a 5 l blood volume). At present, the upper limit of the ‘no toxic effect level’ of RB remains unknown. No toxic effects have been described in the literature, with the recommended therapeutic dose up to 30 mg/day for an adult. There are also reports of people taking more than 200 mg/day safely for 6 months without issues [23, 24].

Whilst RB is known to be safe, extensive toxicology testing was performed to establish the safety of Mirasol-treated blood products. Toxicity of RB and its photoproducts was assessed using both in vitro and in vivo models. No toxicologically significant findings were observed in any of the studies performed. Prolonged and repeated exposure of dogs to Mirasol-treated platelets (78 exposures over 13 weeks) and exposure of dogs to large volumes of Mirasol-treated plasma via plasma exchange did not indicate any toxicity [25, 26]. A range of other tests assessing embryo-fetal development, geno- and cytotoxicity after exposure to Mirasol-treated platelets or high levels of LC excluded any risk and toxicity. In studies with 14C-labeled RB, no binding of RB or its photoproducts to platelets or plasma proteins was detected. No evidence of ne-oantigenicity was observed in either in vitro assays or in patient samples after repeated exposure to Mirasol-treated platelets [26, 27]. In an in vivo model of neoantigenicity, baboons immunized with Mirasol-treated RBCs displayed no immune response, and the recovery of radiolabeled Mirasol-treated RBCs was similar to untreated control RBCs [28]. Additionally, Mirasol treatment did not enhance the rate of acute lung injury in rats as measured in a two-event in vivo TRALI model [29].

The likely exposure of recipients to RB in the clinical setting has been calculated as 0.077 mg/kg (or 5.4 mg) for each product transfused, based on the assumption of an average recipient weight of 70 kg and average RB photoconversion of 18% [22]. In patient samples from the MIRACLE clinical trial no RB was detected in any patient sample, and only traces of LC (0.06–0.07 μmol/l) were detected 24 h after transfusion in two patient samples analyzed (4%). Comparison of a RB exposure level of 0.077 mg/kg to the reported LD50 for intravenous RB infusion in mice of 50-100 mg/kg [15] yields a large safety factor (649-1,299). The exposure level can also be compared to the levels of RB provided in parenteral nutrition. Based on a study by Levy et al. [30] in which RB was provided at levels of 0.43 and 0.72 mg/kg/day and no adverse effects were observed, it is recommended that low birth weight infants receive parenteral nutrition containing 0.45 mg/kg/day RB. The above findings provide strong support for the fact that the Mirasol process does not require subsequent removal of RB and its photoproducts from treated blood components prior to transfusion. This provides much needed safety and simplicity to the pathogen reduction process while minimizing component losses due to bag transfers and/or compound removal steps.

Pathogen Reduction and Leukocyte Inactivation Performance

A pathogen reduction system is expected to achieve an optimal degree of infectivity reduction, balanced with an acceptably small amount of damage to the blood component, and to pose no risk to the recipient. A high enough level of pathogen reduction needs to be achieved to reduce or prevent the likelihood of disease transmission while preserving adequate cell and protein quality. For viruses, the expected viral levels in a donor during acute and chronic infections must be considered for understanding whether a proposed method may prevent disease transmission. For bacteria, a PRT method should be able to maintain products culture-negative during storage when challenged with clinically relevant bacterial loads; for parasites and leukocytes, inactivation of these agents from infected donors or from nonleukoreduced products should be evaluated for 100% efficacy [31]. The majority of results shown in tables 1, 2, 3 were performed in plasma or platelets stored in 100% plasma. Bridging experiments have shown that the performance of the system in the presence of platelet-additive solutions (PAS) is equivalent for viral and bacterial reduction.

Table 1.

Virus log reduction results from standard in vitro assays for infectivity (TCID50)

Virus Model virus used Log/ml reductiona Type
HIV, latent intracellular human HIV 4.5 enveloped
HIV, active cell-associated human HIV 5.9 enveloped
West Nile virus West Nile virus ≥5.1 enveloped
Hepatitis C virus sindbis virus 3.2 enveloped
Hepatitis B virus pseudorabies virus 2.5 enveloped
Rabies virus vesicular stomatitis virus ≥6.3 enveloped
Influenza virus, avian flu virus influenza A virus ≥5.0 enveloped
Cytomegalovirus infectious bovine rhinotracheitis virus 2.1 enveloped
Human B19 virus porcine parvovirus ≥5.0 non-enveloped
Hepatitis A virus human hepatitis A 1.8 non-enveloped
Hepatitis A virus encephalomyocarditis virus 3.2 non-enveloped
Chikungunya virus La Reunion clinical isolate 2.1 enveloped
a

Results expressed as ‘≥’ indicate that the pathogen load was reduced to the limit of detection of the assay.

Table 2.

Parasite log reduction results from standard in vitro assays for infectivity or bio-assay in hamsters [74, 75, 76, 77, 78]

Disease Parasite Log/ml reductiona
Leishmaniasis Leishmania donovani infantum ≥4.0
Malaria Plasmodium falciparum ≥3.2
Chagas disease Trypanosoma cruzi ≥5.0
Babesiosis Babesia microti ≥4.0
Scrub typhus Orienta tsutsugamushi ≥5.0
a

Results expressed as ‘≥’ indicate that the pathogen load was reduced to the limit of detection of the assay.

Table 3.

Comparison of the Mirasol and culture method to inactivate or detect bacteriaa

Bacteria Type Occurrence Mirasol % effectiveness Culture method % effectiveness
Staphylococcus epidermidis Gram-positive 20 100 27
Escherichia coli Gram-negative 8 100 100
Bacillus cereus Gram-positive 7 100 100
Staphylococcus aureus Gram-positive 6 90 53
Streptococcus agalactiae Gram-positive 5 100 100
Streptococcus mitis Gram-positive 5 100 100
Streptococcus pyogenes Gram-positive 5 100 100
Enterobacter cloacae Gram-negative 4 100 100
Propionibacterium acnes Gram-positive 3 100 0
Serratia marcescens Gram-negative 3 100 100
Klebsiella pneumoniae Gram-negative 2 100 100
Acinetobacter baumannii Gram-negative 1 66 100
Yersinia enterocolitica Gram-negative 1 100
100
Overall % effectiveness 98 66
a

Occurrence is the number of cases of contaminated platelets with the particular bacteria as reported in hemovigilance studies[33]. Percent effectiveness is the ability to inactivate or detect the particular bacterial strain at initial contamination levels of < 100 CFU per product. Mirasol treated products had to remain culture negative during 7 days of storage flowed by a 7-day culture monitoring period (BacT/ALERT, anaerobic and aerobic 2-bottle culture system). Overall effectiveness is the multiple of the percent effectiveness with the frequency of occurrence for this agent [34].

The Mirasol system has been shown to substantially reduce the infectious load of enveloped and non-enveloped viruses in test systems, suggesting the potential to add a significant level of protection against tested and untested viruses and to close the window period that exists for screened viruses. HBV and CMV reduction studies were performed using model viruses as well as human or murine virus (manuscripts in preparation). The Mirasol system is the only PRT technology that has demonstrated inactivation of HAV, a virus that is highly resistant to chemical and heat inactivation. The Mirasol system is very effective against parasites such as T. cruzi and B. microti, the causative agents of Chagas disease and babesiosis, respectively, greatly enhancing the safety of the blood product in the absence of parasite screening. Contamination of blood products with bacteria most frequently occurs at the time of phlebotomy, or from asymptomatic donor bacteremia, resulting in low levels of contamination [32]. 22 clinically relevant bacteria strains were evaluated that are responsible for 98% of severe bacterial infections after transfusion, as reported in hemovigilance reports [33]. Mirasol treatment showed overall 98% effectiveness against these strains using clinically relevant contamination levels [34]. Relative to bacterial detection (BacT/ATERT 2-bottle system, 48-hour quarantine), which was overall 66% effective, the Mirasol system was superior in reducing the number of bacterial contaminations post processing (table 3).

Residual leukocytes in blood products can mediate a series of adverse immunological effects in the recipient. Leukoreduction reduces, but does not entirely remove donor leukocytes from blood products. Residual leukocytes passed from donor to recipient have the capacity to induce complications in the recipient, and inactivation of donor leukocytes is essential in preventing transfusion-associated graft-versus-host disease (TA-GvHD) [35]. Gamma irradiation (25-30 Gy) is currently the accepted standard of care for transfusions in immunocompromised patients or patient populations that are particularly susceptible to TA-GvHD. Mirasol treatment is as effective as gamma irradiation in inactivating leukocytes [36, 37], providing an alternative to gamma irradiation. Additional benefits of Mirasol treatment, beyond the prevention of TA-GvHD, may come from the prevention of alloimmunization and cytokine production (table 4). Data currently available indicate that Mirasol-treated leukocytes are incapable of stimulating or binding to allogeneic cells [38], that they prevent alloimmunization in an animal model [39] and that they mediate less of a decrease in platelet count increments with increasing numbers of transfusions in the clinical setting [37]. Elimination of cytokine production is beneficial because cytokine accumulation in stored platelet products has been associated with the occurrence of febrile nonhemolytic transfusion reactions. The cytokines such as IL-8, IL-6 and TNF-α are also known as endogenous pyrogens. After Mirasol treatment significantly lower amounts of TNF-α, IL-6 and IL-8 are detected in supernatants of treated leukocytes than in untreated or gamma-irradiated control cells [36, 79].

Table 4.

Leukocyte inactivation after Mirasol PRT treatment [35, 37, 38, 39, 79]

Extent of inactivation after PRT treatment
In vitro
 Limiting dilution assay (LDA) >6 log10 reduction of viable T cells
 Cytokine synthesis elimination of IL-8 and IL-1β release during storage
and
elimination IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-10, TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-8, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-12 p70 synthesis upon activation
 Antigen presentation prevented in mixed lymphocyte cultures

In vivo
 Murine transfusion model prevention of TA-GvHD
 Rat allo-immunization model prevention of allo-antibody formation

Mirasol PRT System for Platelets

It is critical that Mirasol-treated platelets remain viable and hemostatically effective. A series of in vitro studies were performed to assess platelet quality after Mirasol treatment, and a correlation between in vitro parameters and in vivo performance was established [40]. In these studies pH and lactate production rate were found to be most strongly correlated with the in vivo recovery and survival of Mirasol-treated platelets [40]. Glucose consumption rate and swirl also showed some correlation with these in vivo parameters, though to a lesser extent. P-selectin, pO2 and pCO2 expression in Mirasol-treated platelets, however, were poorly correlated with in vivo platelet recovery and survival. These relationships formed the basis for the platelet quality evaluations of the Mirasol PRT system during the development and initial field evaluations.

Changes in cell quality parameters do occur; in particular metabolism is up-regulated in treated platelets, and treatment induces some degree of platelet activation. However, shear-induced adhesion is maintained in Mirasol-treated platelets [41, 42, 43], and mitochondrial function is preserved [44, 45]. Despite the fact that mitochondrial DNA is fragmented by the treatment [11], the wavelength of UV light used in the process is distinct from the one where cytochrome C, FMN and FAD absorb (370-450 nm) [46], resulting in intact electron transfer processes within mitochondrial membranes. Low oxygen levels in the treated products are a simple measurement and indication of functional mitochondria, since oxygen is consumed and ATP produced during mitochondrial respiration [44, 45]. Additional evidence that mitochondria are intact after Mirasol treatment comes from the use of PAS, in which acetate is used as a substitute for glucose. Mitochondria of Mirasol-treated platelets are able to convert acetate and make ATP as a result [47]. Again, in order for this to occur, the mitochondrial respiratory path must be intact. This finding is important because mitochondrial respiration plays a critical role in the activation and effectiveness of platelets during clot formation at sites of vascular injury [48]. In the absence of this functionality, reduced or limited effectiveness of platelets in stopping or preventing bleeding may be an undesirable consequence [49].

The quality of Mirasol-treated platelets obtained from various apheresis platforms or from whole blood have been extensively evaluated. The Mirasol system's treatment capability allows treatment of platelets collected in plasma or PAS, with SSP+ (MacoPharma, Langen, Germany) being the recommended PAS for longer storage. The ability to treat hyperconcentrated plasma reduced platelet units that require the addition of PAS after treatment enables the user to treat double and triple products and split them for storage. Treated units can be stored for up to 5 days under standard blood banking conditions. Table 5 provides an overview of the parameters evaluated at external sites and appropriate references.

Table 5.

In vitro platelet quality assessment

Parameters Measures References
Metabolic parameters pH (22 °C) [11, 45, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85]
lactate production rate
glucose consumption rate
pO2
pCO2
Activation markers P-selectin expression
Morphology and membrane integrity parameters swirl
hypotonic shock response (HSR)
annexin V release (indicates loss of membrane integrity and cellular injury)

Mitochondrial structure and function parameters JC-1 signal (measures mitochondrial transmembrane potential) [44, 86]
MTT reduction assay (measures mitochondrial enzymatic activity)
ATP concentration in platelets

Platelet adhesion and aggregation parameters platelet aggregation velocity upon platelet activation [42, 43, 87]
shear-induced platelet adhesion and aggregation as measured by
Impact-R (DiaMed), Rotem or ex vivo perfusion model

Clinical Experience

In a randomized controlled trial (MIRACLE trial) [50] the efficacy and safety of PRT-treated platelets was evaluated. A total of 678 platelet transfusions were given to 110 patients during the study (56 in the Mirasol and 54 in the reference group). The average 1-hour corrected count increment (CCI) in the Mirasol-treated group was 11,725 ± 1,140 and in the reference group 16,939 ± 1,149. In order to meet the non-inferiority criterion, the absolute difference between the two arms needed to be less than 2,940, hence non-inferiority could not be claimed, while inferiority could not be established due to the fact that the variability observed in the CCI values exceeded the planned margins used in establishing the sample size. Average 24-hour CCI was 6,676 ± 883 for PRT-treated and 9,886 ± 915 for untreated platelets. 71.3% of the Mirasol-treated products resulted in successful transfusion increment compared to 84.1% in the reference group (success is defined by 1-hour CCI values ≥7,500 [51]). When assessed at 24 h post transfusion, the proportions were 58.9% and 68.1% for Mirasol-treated and reference platelets, respectively (success is defined by 24-hour CCI values ≥4,500 [51]). These percentages are within the ranges that have been reported in other studies [49]. Importantly, no differences between the Mirasol-treated and control group were detected for mean number of days between transfusions, mean number of platelet transfusions per patient and dose of platelets transfused. Safety data did not identify any major adverse events associated with the transfusion of Mirasol-treated platelets. The frequencies of all adverse events and severe adverse events were similar between both treatment arms. Two patients in the Mirasol-treated group (1.8%) had severe adverse events that were ‘very likely’ related to a transfusion (refractoriness in both cases), and 2 patients in the reference arm had events categorized as ‘very likely’ related (eyelid edema and anaphylactic shock) (table 6).

Table 6.

Clinical evaluations [50, 88, 89, 90, 91]

Site Number of transfusions 24-hour CCI Adverse events Neoantigen formation
MIRACLE trial – reference group 160 9,886 3 (severe*) ND
MIRACLE trial – Mirasol group 175 6,676 2 (severe*) none
Serbia 87 5,166 none none
Poland 4,328 ND 12 (grade 1#) none
Spain 44 6,351 none ND
Mirasol evaluation program 368 ND none ND
*

The following categories of adverse event severity were used: Mild: Awareness of a sign or symptom that does not interfere with the patients usual activity or is transient, resolves without treatment and with no sequelae. Moderate: Interferes with the patient's usual activity and/or requires symptomatic treatment. Severe: Symptom(s) causing severe discomfort and significant impact of the patients usual activity and requires treatment.

#

Severity of reactions followed the classification suggested by the International Hemovigilance Network. Grade 1: The recipient required no more than discontinuation of transfusion and symptomatic management. No long-term morbidity. Grade 2: The recipient requires in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization due to hypotension, or hypotension led directly to long-term morbidity.

At the time of manuscript preparation post market surveillance on over 6,000 transfusions revealed no device-related adverse events. Published clinical data from sites evaluating and using the Mirasol system in routine is summarized in table 6.

Mirasol PRT System for Plasma

Pathogen reduction techniques were first developed for plasma, and PRT-treated plasma products have been on the market in Europe for more than a decade. FFP intended for transfusion to patients must contain adequate functional levels of coagulation factors and other therapeutically valuable proteins. Protein levels should be as close as possible to those found in fresh plasma [52]. Blood component processing can affect the quality of plasma products, particularly labile coagulation factors such as factors V and VIII. Plasma frozen within 8 h of collection shows the highest levels of coagulation factor retention. Plasma separated from whole blood donations and frozen below −18 °C within 24 h of collection still shows good retention of coagulation activity. However, when compared with historic data on FFP frozen within 8 h, levels of fibrinogen, factor V, factor VIII and factor XI in FFP frozen within 24 h have been shown to be reduced by 12%, 15%, 23% and 7%, respectively [53].

As shown in figure 1, Mirasol-treated FFP shows high overall protein retention under a broad range of blood banking conditions. Mirasol-treated FFP meets the Council of Europe (CoE) guidelines [54], with external validation studies showing on average factor VIIIc levels of 0.8 ± 0.2 IU/ml post treatment [55, 56, 57]. Protein content meets CoE guidelines even when whole blood is held overnight at room temperature and plasma is separated up to 18 h or frozen up to 24 h after collection. Additionally, anticoagulant factors such as protein C and protein S are well preserved after treatment with a 96% retention reported post treatment for both proteins [56]. Extended storage at −30 °C for up to 2 years does not significantly decrease protein quality [58]. The option to Mirasol-treat previously frozen plasma has also been validated and enables sites to treat products already in inventory [59].

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Average percent plasma protein retention for coagulants from external validation [55, 56, 57].

Many countries use cryoprecipitate prepared from plasma to treat hypofibrinogenemia, von Willebrand disease, hemophilia and in massive transfusion situations in combination with other blood components. Cryoprecipitate contains the major portion of factor VIII, von Willebrand factor, fibrinogen, factor XIII, and fibronectin of freshly thawed plasma. Cryoprecipitate made from Mirasol-treated FFP exceeds the CoE requirements containing 95 ± 21 IU/unit factor VIII and 272 ± 50 mg/unit fibrinogen (manuscript in preparation).

Clinical Experience

Observational clinical studies in three European countries are ongoing to assess product performance in routine use. Several blood banks in Poland implemented Mirasol-treated plasma and platelets, and more than 10,000 plasma units have been treated to date with the Mirasol process. No device-related adverse events have been reported. The Blood Transfusion Institute in Nis, Serbia, evaluated the clinical performance of treated products in patients with hypoprothrombinemia by international normalized ratio (INR). INR is a measurement to standardize results for prothrombin time (normal range 0.8–1.2) since results vary depending on what type of analytical system is used. A mean decrease in INR of 0.49 (range 0.33-0.80) after transfusion of Mirasol-treated plasma was observed, an acceptable decrease in coagulation time [60].

Mirasol System for Whole Blood

The Mirasol system is being further developed for the treatment of whole blood, providing a single pathogen reduction and leukocyte inactivation step, followed by the use of the product as whole blood or separation into components. The treatment of RBCs or whole blood has been more challenging due to the absorption of light by hemoglobin. Although the peak absorption of hemoglobin (400-450 nm) is outside the spectral region of the Mirasol lamp output, the UV light energy dose delivered to units of whole blood is normalized for RBC volume (J/mlRBC).

As part of the development of the Mirasol System for Whole Blood in vitro parameters that may predict 24-hour survival of RBCs in vivo were established in a clinical evaluation (Cancelas et al, manuscript submitted for publication). In this study component quality and leukocyte inactivation was assessed after the addition of 35 ml of RB solution (500 μmol/l) to whole blood units and exposure to 22, 33 and 44 J/mlRBC UV light. Mirasol-treated packed RBCs were stored for 42 days prior to infusion of small aliquots of radiolabeled RBCs into healthy volunteers. The study showed that key RBC cell quality parameters, such as hemolysis and ATP concentration, may be predictive of their 24-hour recovery and T50 survival. These variables were used to assess modifications to the system, including storage duration, storage temperature and appropriate energy dose for treatment. Mirasol-treated platelet concentrates were stored for 5 days, and Mirasol-treated FFP was stored frozen for 28 days. The mean pH of stored platelet units on day 5 met AABB requirements, and no platelet loss during storage was observed. Overall protein retention after treatment was not significantly affected and levels of fibrinogen, factors V, VIIIc and XI were on average higher than reported for PRT-treated plasma (fig. 1).

Treatment with the Mirasol System for Whole Blood in the current configuration exposes units to 80 J/mlRBC UV light; this treatment energy was chosen to balance blood component quality, pathogen reduction and storage length. After treatment whole blood can be separated into components that are stored according to standard procedures. Hemolysis in Mirasol-treated RBCs increased during storage and was on average below 1% on day 35 of storage. Potassium increased and sodium levels decreased in treated units compared to untreated controls [61]. Osmotic fragility curves were similar for Mirasol-treated and untreated units throughout 42 days of storage [62]. Plasma factor activities in Mirasol-treated FFP were lower than in untreated control units, but comparable to levels observed in Mirasol-treated plasma (fig. 1). Platelet swirl and pH was not affected by the treatment during 5 days of storage, whereas glucose consumption and lactate production were enhanced as previously described [63].

In addition, the storage of Mirasol-treated whole blood is being evaluated. A whole blood product stored for short periods of time (24-48 h) at room temperature would be useful for massively transfused patients in military or trauma settings. RBC and platelet quality was assessed during storage of whole blood for 7 days. RBC hemolysis remained at background levels for all units tested throughout storage [64]. Platelet function was evaluated via ImpactR and thromboe-lastography (TEG) – methods to assess the adhesion and aggregation potential of platelets. No significant differences were detected between Mirasol-treated and untreated control platelets when whole blood units were stored for 7 days [65].

The effectiveness of the Mirasol System for Whole Blood was evaluated with tests of pathogen reduction (virus, bacteria and parasite reduction) and leukocyte inactivation. Virus reduction tests used non-enveloped (blue tongue virus, HAV and canine parvovirus) and enveloped (vesicular stomatitis virus, infectious bovine rhinotracheitis virus) viruses. All viruses were susceptible to inactivation, ranging from 1.2 log/ml reduction levels for HAV to 4.5 log/ml for vesicular stomatitis virus [62]. The treatment was 100% effective against bacteria commonly found in RBC units (S. liquefaciens and Y. enterocolitica). Contamination of whole blood units with different strains of S. epidermidis, found in 20% of contaminated platelet units as reported in hemovigilance studies [33], yielded 83-100% effectiveness depending on the bacterial strain. Effectiveness against S. epidermidis (ATCC # 12228) was 83%, whereas the ability of the culture system to detect this particular strain (BacT/ALERT) has been shown to be 27% [34]. A study in whole blood evaluating the effectiveness of the system against infectious T. cruzi, the causative agent of causes Chagas disease, showed reduction to the limit of detection of the assay at clinically relevant parasite concentrations [66]. Leukocytes are inactivated to the limit of detection of the assays at energies of 33 and 44 J/mlRBC, and engraftment of human T cells in a murine GvHD model is prevented [34].

Conclusion

Blood transfusions are life-saving but unfortunately can also serve as a potential vector for the spread of disease. The Mirasol PRT System is capable of inactivating significant levels of pathogens and leukocytes and is thus expected to reduce the risk of disease transmission and adverse events while maintaining acceptable quality of the treated blood products. Pathogen reduction of blood components represents a means to address concerns about disease transmission via blood transfusions, but sufficient benefit and cost-effectiveness to warrant implementation of the technology must be established. Custer et al. [67] developed a new health economics model to assess the cost-effectiveness of the Mirasol system in mitigating the risk of transfusion-associated infectious and some non-infectious threats. In this publication they used quality-adjusted life year (QALY) as a measure to assess the monetary value of a medical intervention. The value is based on the number of years of life that would be added by the intervention. The incremental cost-effectiveness of Mirasol-treated platelets and plasma is USD 1,423,000/QALY compared to current screens and interventions. The incremental cost-effectiveness of the Mirasol System for Whole Blood compared to current screens and interventions is USD 1,276,000/QALY. If Mirasol treatment were to be adopted, it could be even more cost-effective than reported here since bacterial culture for platelets and gamma irradiation for leukocyte inactivation could potentially be eliminated. This value compares to the cost-effectiveness of HIV and HCV NAT testing, a technology that has been broadly adopted, exceeding USD 1.5 million/QALY in the USA [68, 69].

The efficacy of pathogen-inactivated or pathogen-reduced platelet products has been established in clinical trials by tracking post-transfusion CCI. However, whether 1-hour and 24-hour CCI measurements have the sensitivity and specificity to be clinically meaningful is the subject of debate. The use of bleeding as a primary endpoint has more clinical relevance although it is difficult to measure in a consistent manner [70]. Evaluating platelet function in patients before and after transfusion may be an approach to establish clinical performance of a treated platelet product. An ongoing clinical trial is investigating whether TEG can be a useful tool to predict transfusion outcomes by comparing Mirasol-treated and control platelets (table 7).

Table 7.

Ongoing clinical trials

Trial size Primary endpoint Secondary endpoint
Italian Platelet Technology Assessment Study (IPTAS), Italy 840 Number of patients with ≥ grade 2 bleeding CCI
platelet and RBC transfusions
transfusion interval
allo-antibody formation from Luminex assay

Pathogen Reduction – Extended Storage Study (PRESS), Denmark 40 TEG measurements and correlation with CCI adverse events
bleeding

Pathogen Reduction Evaluation and Predictive Analytical Rating Score (PREPARES), the Netherlands 618 number of patients with ≥ grade 2 bleeding CCI
platelet and RBC transfusions
transfusion interval
allo-antibody formation from Luminex assay

The clinical benefits of a Mirasol-treated platelet product may include benefits related to leukocyte inactivation. The inactivation of leukocytes prevents TA-GVHD, without the use of gamma irradiation, and may also help prevent platelet refractoriness. Prevention of immune-mediated refractoriness may significantly improve the care of patients on chronic platelet transfusion support. Ongoing clinical trials (table 7) will assess the effectiveness of the Mirasol PRT System in preventing alloimmunization, by assessing alloantibody formation in multiple transfused patients.

In contrast to PRT-treated platelet products, treated plasma has been on the market in Europe for a number of years. Review of the literature demonstrates that in vitro protein quality of treated plasma products (solvent/detergent, methylene blue, Intercept and Mirasol) is comparable and that treated plasma performs well clinically [71,72].

The pathogen reduction process for whole blood has been shown to be effective in terms of pathogen reduction and leukocyte inactivation, and the quality of all three components separated from Mirasol-treated whole blood is adequately preserved. Mirasol-treated whole blood stored at room temperature retains platelet, plasma and RBC function that are critical to the support of massively transfused casualties. Clinical studies are being designed to establish the in vivo performance of this product.

No PRT-treated blood products are presently approved in the USA. Harvey Alter stated in a recent article that ‘pathogen reduction calls for a new paradigm in transfusion safety, namely, the transition from a reactive to a proactive and preemptive strategy for the prevention of transfusion-transmitted diseases’ [73]. With this in mind, when evaluating a pathogen reduction technology the traditional 6-log reduction, established by developers of sanitary solutions and pathogen reduction methods of plasma [31], must be reconsidered since it may far exceed the practical need given current tests for known viral pathogens. As these systems move into increased routine use, the balance between pathogen reduction levels and component quality must be recognized as well as the fact that there is currently no system available that affords 100% efficacy in detecting pathogens in blood products.

Disclosure Statement

Both authors are employees of CaridianBCT Biotechnologies.

References

  • 1.Klein HG. Will blood transfusion ever be safe enough? JAMA. 2000;284:238–240. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.2.238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Moor AC, Dubbelman TM, VanSteveninck J, Brand A. Transfusion-transmitted diseases: risks, prevention and perspectives. Eur J Haematol. 1999;62:1–18. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0609.1999.tb01108.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Goodrich RP, Platz MS. The design and development of selective, photoactivated drugs for sterilization of blood products. Drugs Future. 1997;22:159–171. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kasai H, Yamaizumi Z, Yamamoto F, Bessho T, Nishimura S, Berger M, Cadet J. Photosensitized formation of 8-hydroxyguanine (7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine) in DNA by riboflavin. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser. 1992:181–182. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Korycka-Dahl M, Richardson T. Photodegradation of DNA with fluorescent light in the presence of riboflavin, and photoprotection by flavin triplet-state quenchers. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1980;610:229–234. doi: 10.1016/0005-2787(80)90004-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kuratomi K, Kobayashi Y. Studies on the interactions between DNA and flavins. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1977;476:207–217. doi: 10.1016/0005-2787(77)90004-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Peak JG, Peak MJ, MacCoss M. DNA breakage caused by 334-nm ultraviolet light is enhanced by naturally occurring nucleic acid components and nucleotide coenzymes. Photochem Photobiol. 1984;39:713–716. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1984.tb03914.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Speck WT, Rosenkranz HS. Phototherapy for neonatal hyperbilirubinemia – a potential environmental health hazard to newborn infants: a review. Environ Mutagen. 1979;1:321–336. doi: 10.1002/em.2860010404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kumar V, Lockerbie O, Keil SD, Ruane PH, Platz MS, Martin CB, Ravanat JL, Cadet J, Goodrich RP. Riboflavin and UV-light based pathogen reduction: extent and consequence of DNA damage at the molecular level. Photochem Photobiol. 2004;80:15–21. doi: 10.1562/2003-12-23-RA-036.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Goodrich RP, Edrich RA, Goodrich L, Scott C, Manica K, Hlavinka D, Hovenga N, Hansen E, Gampp D, Keil SD, Gilmour DI, Li J, Martin CB, Platz MS. The antiviral and antibacterial properties of riboflavin and light: applications to blood safety and transfusion medicine. Flavins: Photochemistry and Photobiology. In: Silva E, Edwards AM, editors. Comprehensive Series in Photochemical and Photobiological Sciences. Cambridge: The Royal Society of Chemistry; 2006. pp. 83–113. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Janetzko K, Hinz K, Marschner S, Klüter H, Bugert P. Monitoring of the Mirasol Pathogen Reduction Procedure for Platelet Concentrates by PCR and bioanalyzer. Transfus Med Hemother. 2007;34(suppl 1):S60. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Martin CB, Wilfong E, Ruane P, Goodrich R, Platz M. An action spectrum of the riboflavin-photosensitized inactivation of lambda phage. Photochem Photobiol. 2005;81:474–480. doi: 10.1562/2004-08-25-RA-292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hayashi M, Kishi M, Sofuni T, Ishidate M., Jr Mi-cronucleus tests in mice on 39 food additives and eight miscellaneous chemicals. Food Chem Toxicol. 1988;26:487–500. doi: 10.1016/0278-6915(88)90001-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Munoz N, Hayashi M, Bang LJ, Wahrendorf J, Crespi M, Bosch FX. Effect of riboflavin, retinol, and zinc on micronuclei of buccal mucosa and of esophagus: a randomized double-blind intervention study in China. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1987;79:687–691. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Studer A, Zbinden G, Uehlinger E. Die Pathologie der Avitaminosen and Hypervitaminosen. In: Buchner F, Letterer E, Roulet F, editors. Handbuch der Allgemeinen Pathologie. Berlin: Springer; 1962. pp. 734–987. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Unna K, Greslin JG. Studies on the toxicity and pharmacology of riboflavin. J Pharmacol. 1942;76:75–80. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Bates CJ. Human requirements for riboflavin. Am J Clin Nutr. 1987;46:122–123. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/46.1.122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kostenbauder HB, DeLuca PP, Kowarski CR. Photobinding and photoreactivity of riboflavin in the presence of macromolecules. J Pharm Sci. 1965;54:1243–1251. doi: 10.1002/jps.2600540904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sisson TR. Photodegradation of riboflavin in neonates. Federation Proc. 1987;46:1883–1885. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Yurdakok M, Erdem G, Tekinalp G. Riboflavin in the treatment of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia. Turkish J Pediatr. 1988;30:159–161. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Olsen JH, Hertz H, Kjaer SK, Bautz A, Mellemkjaer L, Boice JD., Jr Childhood leukemia following phototherapy for neonatal hyperbilirubinemia (Denmark) Cancer Causes Control. 1996;7:411–414. doi: 10.1007/BF00052666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hardwick CC, Herivel TR, Hernandez SC, Ruane PH, Goodrich RP. Separation, identification and quantification of riboflavin and its photoproducts in blood products using high-performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection: a method to support pathogen reduction technology. Photochem Photobiol. 2004;80:609–615. doi: 10.1562/2004-04-14-TSN-139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Expert Group on Vitamins and Minerals: Revised review of riboflavin:. 2002, pp 1-48. www.food.gov.uk/multimedia/pdfs/reviewriboflavin
  • 24.BIBRA Working Group . Riboflavin and its derivatives: toxicity profile. Epscm, Surrey: BIBRA; 1990. pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Reddy H, Buytaert-Hoefen K, Hovenga N, Gampp D, White J, Goodrich R. Acute toxicity of Mirasol PRT-treated FFP in plasma exchange in dogs. Transfusion. 2007;47(suppl):P75A. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Reddy HL, Dayan AD, Cavagnaro J, Gad S, Li J, Goodrich RP. Toxicity testing of a novel riboflavin-based technology for pathogen reduction and white blood cell inactivation. Transfus Med Rev. 2008;22:133–153. doi: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2007.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ambruso DR, Thurman G, Marschner S, Goodrich RP. Lack of antibody formation to platelet neo-antigens after transfusion of riboflavin and ultraviolet light-treated platelet concentrates. Transfusion. 2009;49:2631–2636. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2009.02347.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Goodrich R, Murthy K, Doane S, Fitzpatrick C, Morrow L, Arndt P, Reddy H, Buytaert-Hoefen K, Garraty G. Evaluation of potential immune response and in vivo survival of riboflavin-ultraviolet light-treated red blood cells in baboons. Transfusion. 2009;49:64–74. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2008.01940.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Silliman CC, Khan SY, Ball JB, Kelher MR, Marschner S. Mirasol Pathogen Reduction Technology treatment does not affect acute lung injury in a two-event in vivo model caused by stored blood components. Vox Sang. 2010;98:525–530. doi: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2009.01289.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Levy R, Herzberg GR, Andrews WL, Sutradhar B, Friel JK. Thiamine, riboflavin, folate, and vitamin B12 status of low birth weight infants receiving parenteral and enteral nutrition. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1992;16:241–247. doi: 10.1177/0148607192016003241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Goodrich RP, Custer B, Keil S, Busch M. Defining adequate pathogen reduction performance for transfused blood components. Transfusion. 2010;50:1827–1837. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.02635.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.McDonald CP, Roy A, Mahajan P, Smith R, Charlett A, Barbara JA. Relative values of the interventions of diversion and improved donor-arm disinfection to reduce the bacterial risk from blood transfusion. Vox Sang. 2004;86:178–182. doi: 10.1111/j.0042-9007.2004.00404.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Brecher ME, Hay SN. Bacterial contamination of blood components. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2005;18:195–204. doi: 10.1128/CMR.18.1.195-204.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Goodrich RP, Gilmour D, Hovenga N, Keil SD. A laboratory comparison of pathogen reduction technology treatment and culture of platelet products for addressing bacterial contamination concerns. Transfusion. 2009;49:1205–1216. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2009.02126.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Fast LD, DiLeone G, Cardarelli G, Li J, Goodrich R. Mirasol PRT treatment of donor white blood cells prevents the development of xenogeneic graft-versus-host disease in Rag2-/-gamma c-/- double knockout mice. Transfusion. 2006;46:1553–1560. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2006.00939.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Fast LD, DiLeone G, Marschner S. Inactivation of human white blood cells in platelet products after pathogen reduction technology treatment in comparison to gamma irradiation. Transfusion. 2010 doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.02984.x. doi:10.1111/j.l537-2995.2010.02984.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Marschner S, Fast LD, Baldwin WM, III, Slichter SJ, Goodrich RP. White blood cell inactivation after treatment with riboflavin and ultraviolet light. Transfusion. 2010;50:2489–2498. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.02714.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Jackman R, Heitman J, Marschner S, Goodrich R, Norris PJ. Understanding loss of donor white blood cell immunogenicity following pathogen reduction: mechanisms of action in UV illumination and riboflavin treatment. Transfusion. 2009;49:2686–2699. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2009.02333.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Asano H, Lee CY, Fox-Talbot K, Koh CM, Erdinc MM, Marschner S, Keil S, Goodrich RP, Baldwin WM. Treatment with riboflavin and ultraviolet light prevents alloimmunization to platelet transfusions and cardiac transplants. Transplantation. 2007;84:1174–1182. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000287318.94088.d7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Goodrich RP, Li J, Pieters H, Crookes R, Roodt J, Heyns A. Correlation of in vitro platelet quality measurements with in vivo platelet viability in human subjects. Vox Sang. 2006;90:279–285. doi: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2006.00761.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Marschner S, Hovenga N, Goodrich RP. Coagulation potential of Mirasol Pathogen Reduction technology treated platelets. Vox Sang. 2010;99:247. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Perez-Pujol S, Tonda R, Lozano M, Fuste B, Lopez-Vilchez I, Galan AM, Li J, Goodrich R, Escolar G. Effects of a new pathogen-reduction technology (Mirasol PRT) on functional aspects of platelet concentrates. Transfusion. 2005;45:911–919. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2005.04350.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Picker SM, Schneider V, Gathof BS. Platelet function assessed by shear-induced deposition of split triple-dose apheresis concentrates treated with pathogen reduction technologies. Transfusion. 2009;49:1224–1232. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2009.02092.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Li J, Lockerbie O, de KD, Rice J, McLean R, Goodrich RP. Evaluation of platelet mitochondria integrity after treatment with Mirasol pathogen reduction technology. Transfusion. 2005;45:920–926. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2005.04381.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Picker SM, Schneider V, Oustianskaia L, Gathof BS. Cell viability during platelet storage in correlation to cellular metabolism after different pathogen reduction technologies. Transfusion. 2009;49:2311–2318. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2009.02316.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Hockberger PE, Skimina TA, Centonze VE, Lavin C, Chu S, Dadras S, Reddy JK, White JG. Activation of flavin-containing oxidases underlies light-induced production of H2O2 in mammalian cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:6255–6260. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.11.6255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Marschner S, Hovenga N, Gathof BS, Picker SM, de Korte D, Goodrich R. Acetate consumption in platelets treated with different pathogen reduction technologies. Vox Sang. 2010;99:247. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Akkerman J-W, Verhoeven AJ. Energy Metabolism and Function. In: Holmsen H, editor. Platelet Responses and Metabolism. Vol 3: Response-Metabolism Relationships. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1987. pp. 69–99. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Kerkhoffs JL, van Putten WL, Novotny VM, Te Boekhorst PA, Schipperus MR, Zwagmga JJ, van Pampus LC, de Greef GE, Luten M, Huijgens PC, Brand A, van Rhenen DJ. Clinical effectiveness of leucoreduced, pooled donor platelet concentrates, stored in plasma or additive solution with and without pathogen reduction. Br J Haematol. 2010;150:209–217. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2010.08227.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Cazenave JP, Folléa G, Bardiaux L, Boiron JM, Lafeuillade B, Debost M, Lioure B, Harousseau JL, Tabrizi R, Cahn JY, Michallet M, Ambruso D, Schots R, Tissot JD, Sensebé L, Kondo T, McCullough J, Rebulla P, Escolar G, Mintz P, Heddle NM, Goodrich RP, Bruhwyler J, Le C, Cook RJ, Stouch B, for members of the The Mirasol Clinical Evaluation Study Group A randomized controlled clinical trial evaluating the performance and safety of platelets treated with MIRASOL pathogen reduction technology. Transfusion. 2010;50:2362–2375. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.02694.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.British Committee for Standards in Haematology. Blood Transfusion Task Force Guidelines for the use of platelet transfusions. Br J Haematol. 2003;122:10–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2010.08444.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Solheim BG, Seghatchian J. Update on pathogen reduction technology for therapeutic plasma: an overview. Transfus Apher Sci. 2006;35:83–90. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2006.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Cardigan R, Lawrie AS, Mackie IJ, Williamson LM. The quality of fresh-frozen plasma produced from whole blood stored at 4 degrees C overnight. Transfusion. 2005;45:1342–1348. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2005.00219.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Keitel S (ed): Guide to the Preparation, Use and Quality Assurance of Blood Components Strasbourg, Council of Europe, 2009, pp 256-258.
  • 55.Hornsey VS, Drummond O, Morrison A, McMillan L, MacGregor IR, Prowse CV. Pathogen reduction of fresh plasma using riboflavin and ultraviolet light: effects on plasma coagulation proteins. Transfusion. 2009;49:2167–2172. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2009.02272.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Larrea L, Calabuig M, Roldan V, Rivera J, Tsai HM, Vicente V, Roig R. The influence of riboflavin photochemistry on plasma coagulation factors. Transfus Apher Sci. 2009;41:199–204. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2009.09.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Smith J, Rock G. Protein quality in Mirasol pathogen reduction technology-treated, apheresis-derived fresh-frozen plasma. Transfusion. 2010;50:926–931. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2009.02517.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Bihm D, Ettinger A, Buytaert-Hoefen K, Hendrix B, Maldonado-Codina G, Rock G, Giclas P, Goodrich RP. Characterization of plasma protein activity in riboflavinand UV light-treated fresh frozen plasma during 2 years of storage at −30 °C. Vox Sang. 2010;98:108–115. doi: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2009.01238.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Ettinger A, Miklauz MM, Hendrix B, Bihm D, Maldonado-Codina G, Goodrich RP. Protein stability of previously frozen plasma, riboflavin and UV light-treated, refrozen and stored for up to 2 years at −30 °C. Transfus Apher Sci. 2010 doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2010.12.005. (in press). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Antic A, Stanijkovic Z. Clinical performance of buffy coat platelets treated with riboflavin and UV light. Transfusion. 2010;50(suppl):p66A. [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Cancelas J, Rugg N, Worsham DN, Pratt GP, Dunn SK, Reddy H, Fletcher D, Goodrich RP. Quality assessment of stored RBC after treatment of whole blood with the Mirasol System. Transfusion. 2010;50(suppl):p71A. [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Goodrich RP, Doane S, Reddy HL. Design and development of a method for the reduction of infectious pathogen load and inactivation of white blood cells in whole blood products. Biologicals. 2010;38:20–30. doi: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2009.10.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Li J, Goodrich L, Hansen E, Edrich R, Gampp D, Goodrich RP. Platelet glycolytic flux increases stimulated by ultraviolet-induced stress is not the direct cause of platelet morphology and activation changes: possible implications for the role of glucose in platelet storage. Transfusion. 2005;45:1750–1758. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2005.00582.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Reddy H, Marschner S, Doane S, Spotts C, Goodrich RP. Room temperature storage of whole blood treated with the Mirasol System. Vox Sang. 2010;99:p243. [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Reddy H, Doane S, Spotts C, Goodrich RP. In vitro assessments of platelet function in whole blood treated with the Mirasol System and stored at room temperature. Vox Sang. 2010;99:p243. [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Tonnetti L, Thorp AM, Reddy H, Goodrich RP, Leiby DA. Evaluation of the reduction of T cruzi with the Mirasol System for Whole Blood. Transfusion. 2010;50(suppl):p209A. [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Custer B, Agapova M, Martinez RH. The cost-effectiveness of pathogen reduction technology as assessed using a multiple risk reduction model. Transfusion. 2010;50:2461–2473. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.02704.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Jackson BR, Busch MP, Stramer SL, AuBuchon JP. The cost-effectiveness of NAT for HIV, HCV and HBV in whole-blood donations. Transfusion. 2003;43:721–729. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.2003.00392.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Marshall DA, Kleinman SH, Wong JB, AuBuchon JP, Grima DT, Kulin NA, Weinstein MC. Cost-effectiveness of nucleic acid test screening of volunteer blood donations for hepatitis B, hepatitis C and human immunodeficiency virus in the United States. Vox Sang. 2004;86:28–40. doi: 10.1111/j.0042-9007.2004.00379.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Heddle NM. Optimal timing and dosing of platelet transfusions. ISBT Science Series. 2010;5:88–94. [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Prowse C. Properties of pathogen-inactivated plasma components. Transfus Med Rev. 2009;23:124–133. doi: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2008.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Rock G. A comparison of methods of pathogen inactivation of FFP. Vox Sang. 2010 doi: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2010.01374.x. DOI: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2010.01374.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Alter HJ. Pathogen reduction: a precautionary principle paradigm. Transfus Med Rev. 2008;22:97–102. doi: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2008.01.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Cardo LJ, Rentas FJ, Ketchum L, Salata J, Harman R, Melvin W, Weina PJ, Mendez J, Reddy H, Goodrich R. Pathogen inactivation of Leishmania donovani infantum in plasma and platelet concentrates using riboflavin and ultraviolet light. Vox Sang. 2006;90:85–91. doi: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2005.00736.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Cardo LJ, Salata J, Mendez J, Reddy H, Goodrich R. Pathogen inactivation of Trypanosoma cruzi in plasma and platelet concentrates using riboflavin and ultraviolet light. Transfus Apher Sci. 2007;37:131–137. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2007.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Rentas F, Harman R, Gomez C, Salata J, Childs J, Silva T, Lippert L, Montgomery J, Richards A, Chan C, Jiang J, Reddy H, Li J, Goodrich R. Inactivation of Orientia tsutsugamushi in red blood cells, plasma, and platelets with riboflavin and light, as demonstrated in an animal model. Transfusion. 2007;47:240–247. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2007.01094.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Sullivan J, Bounngaseng A, Reddy H, Keil S, Goodrich RP. Inactivation of Plasmodium falciparum in plasma and platelet concentrates with riboflavin and UV light. Vox Sang. 2008;95:p278. [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Tonnetti L, Proctor MC, Reddy HL, Goodrich RP, Leiby DA. Evaluation of the Mirasol pathogen [corrected] reduction technology system against Babesia microti in apheresis platelets and plasma. Transfusion. 2010;50:1019–1027. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2009.02538.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Fast LD, DiLeone G, Li J, Goodrich R. Functional inactivation of white blood cells by Mirasol treatment. Transfusion. 2006;46:642–648. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2006.00777.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Li J, de Korte D, Woolum MD, Ruane PH, Keil SD, Lockerbie O, McLean R, Goodrich RP. Pathogen reduction of buffy coat platelet concentrates using riboflavin and light: comparisons with pathogen-reduction technology-treated apheresis platelet products. Vox Sang. 2004;87:82–90. doi: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2004.00548.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Ostrowski SR, Bochsen L, Salado-Jimena JA, Ullum H, Reynaerts I, Goodrich RP, Johansson PI. In vitro cell quality of buffy coat platelets in additive solution treated with pathogen reduction technology. Transfusion. 2010;50:2210–2219. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.02681.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Picker SM, Steisel A, Gathof BS. Effects of Mirasol PRT treatment on storage lesion development in plasma-stored apheresis-derived platelets compared to untreated and irradiated units. Transfusion. 2008;48:1685–1692. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2008.01778.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Picker SM, Oustianskaia L, Schneider V, Gathof BS. Functional characteristics of apheresis-derived platelets treated with ultraviolet light combined with either amotosalen-HCl (S-59) or riboflavin (vitamin B2) for pathogen-reduction. Vox Sang. 2009;97:26–33. doi: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2009.01176.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Picker SM, Oustianskaia L, Schneider V, Gathof BS. Annexin V release and transmembrane mitochondrial potential during storage of apheresis-derived platelets treated for pathogen reduction. Transfus Med Hemother. 2010;37:7–12. doi: 10.1159/000264666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Ruane PH, Edrich R, Gampp D, Keil SD, Leonard RL, Goodrich RP. Photochemical inactivation of selected viruses and bacteria in platelet concentrates using riboflavin and light. Transfusion. 2004;44:877–885. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2004.03355.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Picker SM, Steisel A, Gathof BS. Cell integrity and mitochondrial function after Mirasol-PRT treatment for pathogen reduction of apheresis-derived platelets: Results of a three-arm in vitro study. Transfus Apher Sci. 2009;40:79–85. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2009.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Galan AM, Lozano M, Molina P, Navalon F, Marschner S, Goodrich R, Escolar G. Impact of pathogen reduction technology and storage in platelet additive solutions on platelet function. Transfusion. 2010 doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.02914.x. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.02914.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Cardoso M, Piotrowski D, Przybylska-Baluta Z, Leleno M, Uszynska A. Transfusion experience with platelet concentrates treated with the Mirasol PRT System in the regional BTS Warsaw. Transfusion. 2010;50(suppl):p67A. [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Marschner S, Villaescusa RD, Perez Vaquero MA, De Fusco G, Arroyo L, Pierelli L, Nucci S, Freitas A. The Mirasol Evaluation Program: use of Mirasol Pathogen Reduction Technology for platelets in routine clinical practice. Vox Sang. 2009;96(suppll):229. [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Stanijkovic ZA, Antic AM, Stamjkovic M. Clinical performance of buffy coat platelets treated with riboflavin and UV light. Transfusion. 2010;50(suppl):p66A. [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Yanez M, Blanco L, Gonzalez A, Moya A, De Coca G, Cuello R. Performance of buffy coat platelets in plasma treated with riboflavin and UV light: in vitro and in vivo evaluation. Transfusion. 2010;50(suppl):p84A. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Transfusion Medicine and Hemotherapy are provided here courtesy of Karger Publishers

RESOURCES