Abstract
The genome of Enterococcus faecalis 62, a commensal isolate from a healthy Norwegian infant, revealed multiple adaptive traits to the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) environment and the milk-containing diet of breast-fed infants. Adaptation to a commensal existence was emphasized by lactose and other carbohydrate metabolism genes within genomic islands, accompanied by the absence of virulence traits.
TEXT
Enterococcus faecalis is a multifaceted lactic acid bacterium with an intimate relationship to human health and disease (7). E. faecalis is among the earliest bacteria that colonize the gastrointestinal tracts of newborns (1), and for most people, E. faecalis is part of the normal commensal intestinal microflora (14). Remarkably, certain strains are used as probiotics (5), but E. faecalis is also a prominent cause of multiresistant nosocomial infections (9, 18). This situation has spurred a tremendous interest in the composition of E. faecalis genomes, with the number of publicly available draft genomes exceeding 50 (2, 15; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genomeprj/20875), but only the V583 and OG1RF genomes have been completely determined (16).
Here we report the complete genome sequence of the commensal E. faecalis 62, which was isolated from a healthy Norwegian infant (20). This isolate has the multilocus sequence type ST66, which is not part of any clonal complex related to nosocomial infections (20). Sequencing was performed at Eurofins MWG-Operon, Germany, using 454 Life Sciences pyrosequencing. Three data sets were obtained: (i) GS FLX, with 235,561 shotgun reads and an average read length of 230 nucleotides (nt); (ii) GS FLX Titanium, with 111,123 shotgun reads and an average read length of 390 nt; (iii) GS 20, with 113,078 reads from a 2-kb paired-end library (of which 56,539 were paired reads, equaling a 50-fold clone coverage) and an average read length of 99 nt (total, ∼101 Mb; ∼32-fold coverage). Contigs were generated and assembled into scaffolds by using the Newbler Assembler software (454 Life Sciences) via the Bioportal server (www.bioportal.uio.no).
The genome structure was compared to reference strain V583 (16) by a progressiveMauve alignment (4). Physical gaps, repeats, and assembly ambiguities were corrected through sequencing of PCR products. Open reading frame (ORF) calling and annotation were first performed using the Institute for Genome Sciences (IGS) annotation service (University of Maryland). Manual annotation was performed using Pfam (6), InterProScan (17), and BLAST comparisons to completely sequenced genomes at NCBI (3).
The genome of E. faecalis 62 consists of a single, circular chromosome (2,988,673 bp; 37.2% GC content), a pseudotemperate linear bacteriophage (EF62phi), and three plasmids (EF62pA, EF62pB, and EF62pC). The chromosome contains 2,893 protein-encoding genes, 54 tRNA-encoding genes, and 4 rRNA-encoding operons. The existence of a linear pseudotemperate Podoviridae bacteriophage, EF62φ (30,505 bp), is new to E. faecalis. This phage replicates extrachromosomally as a linear DNA molecule via a repB gene, while a toxin-antitoxin system probably ensures temperate state maintenance. The EF62pA plasmid (5,143 bp) is virtually identical to E. faecalis plasmid pS86 (10). EF62pB (51,104 bp) is a conjugative plasmid highly similar to pCF10 (8) but lacks the 18-kb Tn916 element. Notably, a Tn916 element is found in the chromosome of E. faecalis 62. EF62pC (55,393 bp) resembles pAM737-type plasmids associated with the pathogenicity island (PAI) element (11, 12, 19).
With respect to virulence traits, E. faecalis 62 contains the gelatinase gelE and serine proteinase sprE genes but displays a gelatinase-negative phenotype (24), caused by a deletion in the fsr regulatory system and consistent with previous observations (13). The genomic region corresponding to the enterococcus PAI in E. faecalis 62 lacks elements involved in virulence, including cytolysin, compared to V583 or MMH594 (19). This genomic island does, however, contain the enterococcal surface protein gene (esp), the bile salt hydrolase gene (cbh), and lactose metabolic pathway genes (lacABCDEFG).
These results illustrate the complexity involved in elucidation of the genomic differences that distinguish commensal and pathogenic E. faecalis isolates.
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.
The sequences determined in this study have been deposited with GenBank and assigned accession numbers CP002491 to CP002495.
Acknowledgments
This project was funded by the Norwegian Research Council (project numbers 191452 and 183653).
We thank Linda Godager for technical assistance, the Bioportal Project for facilitating the use of the Newbler software, and the IGS Annotation Engine (University of Maryland) for services rendered.
Footnotes
Published ahead of print on 11 March 2011.
REFERENCES
- 1. Are A., et al. 2008. Enterococcus faecalis from newborn babies regulate endogenous PPARgamma activity and IL-10 levels in colonic epithelial cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 105:1943–1948 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Bourgogne A., et al. 2008. Large scale variation in Enterococcus faecalis illustrated by the genome analysis of strain OG1RF. Genome Biol. 9:R110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Cummings L., et al. 2002. Genomic BLAST: custom-defined virtual databases for complete and unfinished genomes. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 216:133–138 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Darling A. E., Mau B., Perna N. T. 2010. progressiveMauve: multiple genome alignment with gene gain, loss and rearrangement. PLoS One 5:e11147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Domann E., et al. 2007. Comparative genomic analysis for the presence of potential enterococcal virulence factors in the probiotic Enterococcus faecalis strain Symbioflor 1. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 297:533–539 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Finn R. D., et al. 2008. The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res. 36:D281–D288 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Gilmore M. S., Ferretti J. J. 2003. The thin line between gut commensal and pathogen. Science 299:1999–2002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Hirt H., et al. 2005. Characterization of the pheromone response of the Enterococcus faecalis conjugative plasmid pCF10: complete sequence and comparative analysis of the transcriptional and phenotypic responses of pCF10-containing cells to pheromone induction. J. Bacteriol. 187:1044–1054 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Huycke M. M., Sahm D. F., Gilmore M. S. 1998. Multiple-drug resistant enterococci: the nature of the problem and an agenda for the future. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 4:239–249 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Martinez-Bueno M., Valdivia E., Galvez A., Maqueda M. 2000. pS86, a new theta-replicating plasmid from Enterococcus faecalis. Curr. Microbiol. 41:257–261 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. McBride S. M., et al. 2009. Genetic variation and evolution of the pathogenicity island of Enterococcus faecalis. J. Bacteriol. 191:3392–3402 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. McBride S. M., Fischetti V. A., Leblanc D. J., Moellering R. C., Jr., Gilmore M. S. 2007. Genetic diversity among Enterococcus faecalis. PLoS One 2:e582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Nakayama J., Kariyama R., Kumon H. 2002. Description of a 23.9-kilobase chromosomal deletion containing a region encoding fsr genes which mainly determines the gelatinase-negative phenotype of clinical isolates of Enterococcus faecalis in urine. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68:3152–3155 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Noble C. J. 1978. Carriage of group D streptococci in the human bowel. J. Clin. Pathol. 31:1182–1186 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Palmer K. L., et al. 2010. High-quality draft genome sequences of 28 Enterococcus sp. isolates. J. Bacteriol. 192:2469–2470 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Paulsen I. T., et al. 2003. Role of mobile DNA in the evolution of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis. Science 299:2071–2074 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Quevillon E., et al. 2005. InterProScan: protein domains identifier. Nucleic Acids Res. 33:W116–W120 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Richards M. J., Edwards J. R., Culver D. H., Gaynes R. P. 2000. Nosocomial infections in combined medical-surgical intensive care units in the United States. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 21:510–515 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Shankar N., Baghdayan A. S., Gilmore M. S. 2002. Modulation of virulence within a pathogenicity island in vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis. Nature 417:746–750 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Solheim M., Aakra A., Snipen L. G., Brede D. A., Nes I. F. 2009. Comparative genomics of Enterococcus faecalis from healthy Norwegian infants. BMC Genomics 10:194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]