Skip to main content
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 2011 May;193(9):2276–2289. doi: 10.1128/JB.01137-10

A C-Terminal Region of Yersinia pestis YscD Binds the Outer Membrane Secretin YscC,

Julia A Ross 1, Gregory V Plano 1,*
PMCID: PMC3133092  PMID: 21357482

Abstract

YscD is an essential component of the plasmid pCD1-encoded type III secretion system (T3SS) of Yersinia pestis. YscD has a single transmembrane (TM) domain that connects a small N-terminal cytoplasmic region (residues 1 to 121) to a larger periplasmic region (residues 143 to 419). Deletion analyses established that both the N-terminal cytoplasmic region and the C-terminal periplasmic region are required for YscD function. Smaller targeted deletions demonstrated that a predicted cytoplasmic forkhead-associated (FHA) domain is also required to assemble a functional T3SS; in contrast, a predicted periplasmic phospholipid binding (BON) domain and a putative periplasmic “ring-building motif” domain of YscD could be deleted with no significant effect on the T3S process. Although deletion of the putative “ring-building motif” domain did not disrupt T3S activity per se, the calcium-dependent regulation of the T3S apparatus was affected. The extreme C-terminal region of YscD (residues 354 to 419) was essential for secretion activity and had a strong dominant-negative effect on the T3S process when exported to the periplasm of the wild-type parent strain. Coimmunoprecipitation studies demonstrated that this region of YscD mediates the interaction of YscD with the outer membrane YscC secretin complex. Finally, replacement of the YscD TM domain with a TM domain of dissimilar sequence had no effect on the T3S process, indicating that the TM domain has no sequence-specific function in the assembly or function of the T3SS.

INTRODUCTION

The ability of a bacterial pathogen to initiate and sustain an infection is often dependent upon the pathogen's ability to neutralize host defenses that function to limit bacterial multiplication and/or dissemination. Many Gram-negative bacterial pathogens use a process termed type III secretion (T3S) to inject host cells with effector proteins that target and disrupt critical host defense systems (21). The injection process requires a multicomponent T3S apparatus, termed an injectisome, which transports effector proteins across the bacterial inner and outer membranes as well as across a eukaryotic membrane. The T3S process also plays an essential role in the assembly of the bacterial flagellum (26).

The injectisome consists of a base structure that spans the bacterial inner and outer membranes and an external needle-like structure that extends 40 to 60 nm from the bacterial cell surface (24). The bacterial flagellum consists of a similar base structure (the basal body) that is topped by the flagellar hook and filament structures (26). Both the assembly of the injectisome base structure and the assembly of the flagellar basal body require a set of approximately 10 relatively conserved T3S components (16). Additional essential T3S components are either specific to the injectisome or the flagellum or are specific to a limited subset of type III secretion systems (T3SSs).

The T3S apparatus of the human-pathogenic yersiniae is assembled from 21 essential Yersinia secretion (Ysc) proteins (7, 34). The essential Ysc proteins include conserved components involved in the assembly of the T3S apparatus base structure (YscC, YscD, YscJ, and YscW), core inner membrane secretion components (YscR, YscS, YscT, YscU, and YscV), cytoplasmic ring (YscK and YscQ), ATPase complex (YscL and YscN), and needle and rod assembly compo-nents (YscE, YscF, YscG, YscI, YscO, and YscP). In addition, the YscX and YscY proteins are essential for the T3S process; however, their role in this process is unknown (11). Together, the Ysc proteins direct the ordered assembly of the Ysc T3S apparatus, an essential virulence factor of the human-pathogenic yersiniae. The Yersinia injectisome directs the secretion of numerous T3S substrates, including six Yersinia outer proteins (Yops) that have direct antihost activities within the host's cells (41).

The initial T3S apparatus structure assembled is the base, which consists of the YscC, YscD, and YscJ proteins in the yersiniae (12, 24). YscC is a member of the secretin family of outer membrane proteins that form ring-shaped oligomers involved in the assembly of type II secretion systems (T2SSs), T3SSs, and type IV pili (23, 43). Some secretins, including YscC, require an accessory pilot protein, YscW in the yersiniae, for targeting the secretin to, and insertion into, the outer membrane (5, 14). The assembled YscC oligomer is a stable ring-shaped structure with a central pore-like channel (23).

Completion of Yersinia T3S apparatus base assembly also requires the YscJ and YscD proteins. YscJ is an inner membrane lipoprotein that is predicted to multimerize into a ring-shaped structure on the periplasmic face of the inner membrane (38, 45). YscD is an integral inner membrane protein that is predicted to include a cytoplasmic forkhead-associated (FHA)-containing domain and a large periplasmic domain (PD) (32, 33, 35). Like YscJ, YscD is also predicted to multimerize into a ring-shaped structure. Recently, the structures of predicted periplasmic regions of the YscC homolog EscC, YscJ homolog EscJ, and YscD homolog PrgH were determined (39, 45). Interestingly, these three proteins were found to share a domain with a conserved α2β3 fold that is predicted to function as a conserved “ring-building motif” that may aid in the assembly of the T3S apparatus base structure. In this study, we investigated the role of individual regions and defined domains of the Yersinia pestis YscD protein in the assembly and function of the Ysc T3S apparatus.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains and growth conditions.

Escherichia coli DH5α and Y. pestis KIM strains (see Table 1) were grown in heart infusion broth (HIB) or on tryptose blood agar (TBA) plates (BD-Difco) at 27°C (Y. pestis) or 37°C (E. coli). The antibiotics ampicillin, kanamycin, and streptomycin (Sm) were used at 50 μg/ml. For standard secretion assays, Y. pestis strains were grown in thoroughly modified Higuchi's (TMH) medium in the presence or absence of 2.5 mM CaCl2 for 1 h at 27°C and then shifted to 37°C for the next 5 h as previously described (18). For complementation studies in the ΔyscD background, FLAG-tagged YscD proteins (pFLAG-MAC or pFLAG-ATS vector) were induced with 0.05 mM IPTG (isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside) at the temperature shift. Expression of FLAG-tagged YscD proteins in the wild-type parent strain (KIM5-3001) (assay for dominant-negative phenotype) was induced with 0.05 mM IPTG during the overnight culture as well as for the duration of the assay unless otherwise indicated.

Table 1.

Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study

Strain or plasmid Description Source
E. coli strain
    DH5α F φ80lacZΔM15 Δ(lacZYA argF)U169 endAI recAI hsdR17 deoR supE44 thi-1 gyr96 relA1 6
Y. pestis strains
    KIM5-3001 (parent) Smr pCD1 pPCP1 pMT1 25
    KIM5-3001.12 Smr pCD1 (ΔyscC) pPCP1 pMT1 35
    KIM5-3001.14 Smr pCD1 (ΔyscD) pPCP1 pMT1 35
    KIM5-3001.P39 Smr pCD1 (ΔsycE-yopE::km) pPCP1 pMT1 10
    KIM5-3001.P39.F3 Smr pCD1 (ΔsycE-yopE::km yscF D28A) pPCP1 pMT1 40
    KIM5-3001.P62 Smr pCD1 (ΔsycE-yopE::km ΔyopN) pPCP1 pMT1 40
Plasmids
    pFLAG-MAC Expression vector: encodes FLAG peptide Sigma-Aldrich
    pFLAG-ATS Expression vector: encodes OmpA secretion signal (ss) fused to FLAG peptide Sigma-Aldrich
    pFLAG-YscDFL HindIII- and BglII-digested PCR fragment in pFLAG-MAC vector encoding full-length FLAG-YscD This study
    pFLAG-YscD6–419 HindIII- and BglII-digested PCR fragment in pFLAG-MAC encoding FLAG-YscD6–419 This study
    pFLAG-YscD13–419 HindIII- and BglII-digested PCR fragment in pFLAG-MAC encoding FLAG-YscD13–419 This study
    pFLAG-YscD47–419 HindIII- and BglII-digested PCR fragment in pFLAG-MAC encoding FLAG-YscD47–419 This study
    pFLAG-YscD76–419 HindIII- and BglII-digested PCR fragment in pFLAG-MAC encoding FLAG-YscD76–419 This study
    pFLAG-YscD119–419 HindIII- and BglII-digested PCR fragment in pFLAG-MAC encoding FLAG-YscD119–419 This study
    pFLAG-YscD143–419 HindIII- and BglII-digested PCR fragment in pFLAG-MAC encoding FLAG-YscD143–419 This study
    pssFLAG-YscD143–419 HindIII- and BglII-digested PCR fragment in pFLAG-ATS encoding ssFLAG-YscD143–419 This study
    pFLAG-YscD157–419 HindIII- and BglII-digested PCR fragment in pFLAG-MAC encoding FLAG-YscD157–419 This study
    pssFLAG-YscD157–419 HindIII- and BglII-digested PCR fragment in pFLAG-ATS encoding ssFLAG-YscD157–419 This study
    pFLAG-YscD217–419 HindIII- and BglII-digested PCR fragment in pFLAG-MAC encoding FLAG-YscD217–419 This study
    pssFLAG-YscD217–419 HindIII- and BglII-digested PCR fragment in pFLAG-ATS encoding ssFLAG-YscD217–419 This study
    pFLAG-YscD283-419 HindIII- and digested PCR fragment in pFLAG-MAC encoding FLAG-YscD283-419 This study
    pssFLAG-YscD283-419 HindIII- and digested PCR fragment in pFLAG-ATS encoding ssFLAG-YscD283-419 This study
    pFLAG-YscD354-419 HindIII- and BglII-digested PCR fragment in pFLAG-MAC encoding FLAG-YscD354-419 This study
    pssFLAG-YscD354-419 HindIII- and BglII-digested PCR fragment in pFLAG-ATS encoding ssFLAG-YscD354-419 This study
    pFLAG-YscD1–353 HindIII- and BglII-digested PCR fragment in pFLAG-MAC encoding FLAG-YscD1–353 This study
    pFLAG-YscD1–282 HindIII- and BglII-digested PCR fragment in pFLAG-MAC encoding FLAG-YscD1–282 This study
    pFLAG-YscD1–216 HindIII- and BglII-digested PCR fragment in pFLAG-MAC encoding FLAG-YscD1–216 This study
    pFLAG-YscD1–156 HindIII- and BglII-digested PCR fragment in pFLAG-MAC encoding FLAG-YscD1–156 This study
    pFLAG-YscD13-353 HindIII- and BglII-digested PCR fragment in pFLAG-MAC encoding FLAG-YscD13-353 This study
    pssFLAG-YscD143–353 HindIII- and BglII-digested PCR fragment in pFLAG-MAC encoding FLAG-YscD143–353 This study
    pFLAG-YscDΔ24–72 HindIII- and BglII-digested PCR fragment in pFLAG-MAC encoding FLAG-YscD with an in-frame deletion of the FHA domain (FLAG-YscDΔ24–72) This study
    pFLAG-YscDΔ88–113 HindIII- and BglII-digested PCR fragment in pFLAG-MAC encoding FLAG-YscD with an in-frame deletion of the region between the FHA domain and TM domain (FLAG-YscDΔ88–113) This study
    pFLAG-YscDΔ163–208 HindIII- and BglII-digested PCR fragment in pFLAG-MAC encoding FLAG-YscD with an in-frame deletion of the PD1 domain (FLAG-YscDΔ163–208) This study
    pFLAG-YscDΔ224–277 HindIII- and BglII-digested PCR fragment in pFLAG-MAC encoding FLAG-YscD with an in-frame deletion of the PD2 (BON) domain (FLAG-YscDΔ224–277) This study
    pFLAG-YscDΔ290–351 HindIII- and BglII-digested PCR fragment in pFLAG-MAC encoding FLAG-YscD with an in-frame deletion of the PD3 domain (FLAG-YscDΔ290–351) This study
    pFLAG-YscDΔ163–351 HindIII- and BglII-digested PCR fragment in pFLAG-MAC encoding FLAG-YscD with an in-frame deletion of the PD1, -2, and -3 domains (FLAG-YscDΔ163–351) This study
    pFLAG-YscDΔ224–351 HindIII- and BglII-digested PCR fragment in pFLAG-MAC encoding FLAG-YscD with an in-frame deletion of the PD2 and -3 domains (FLAG-YscDΔ224–351) This study
    pFLAG-YscDΔ290–315 HindIII- and BglII-digested PCR fragment in pFLAG-MAC encoding FLAG-YscD with a small in-frame deletion within the PD3 domain (FLAG-YscDΔ290–315) This study
    pFLAG-YscDΔ316–351 HindIII- and BglII-digested PCR fragment in pFLAG-MAC encoding FLAG-YscD with a small in-frame deletion within the PD3 domain (FLAG-YscDΔ316–351) This study
    pssFLAG-YscD283–353 HindIII- and BglII-digested PCR fragment in pFLAG-ATS encoding ssFLAG-YscD283–353 This study
    pFLAG-YscD-TM-24 HindIII- and BglII-digested PCR fragment in pFLAG-MAC encoding FLAG-YscD1–120-PspCYent58-81-YscD143–419 This study
    pFLAG-YscD-TM-28 HindIII- and BglII-digested PCR fragment in pFLAG-MAC encoding FLAG-YscD1–120-PspCYp38-65-YscD149-419 This study
    pPHO-YscD1–29 SacI- and ApaI-digested PCR fragment encoding YscD residues 1–29 in pPHO1 This study
    pPHO-YscD1–54 SacI- and ApaI-digested PCR fragment encoding YscD residues 1–54 in pPHO1 This study
    pPHO-YscD1–63 SacI- and ApaI-digested PCR fragment encoding YscD residues 1–63 in pPHO1 This study
    pPHO-YscD1–83 SacI- and ApaI-digested PCR fragment encoding YscD residues 1–83 in pPHO1 This study
    pPHO-YscD1–110 SacI- and ApaI-digested PCR fragment encoding YscD residues 1–110 in pPHO1 This study
    pPHO-YscD1–121 SacI- and ApaI-digested PCR fragment encoding YscD residues 1–121 in pPHO1 This study
    pPHO-YscD1–162 SacI- and ApaI-digested PCR fragment encoding YscD residues 1–162 in pPHO1 This study
    pPHO-YscD1–180 SacI- and ApaI-digested PCR fragment encoding YscD residues 1–180 in pPHO1 This study
    pPHO-YscD1–256 SacI- and ApaI-digested PCR fragment encoding YscD residues 1–256 in pPHO1 This study
    pPHO-YscD1–310 SacI- and ApaI-digested PCR fragment encoding YscD residues 1–310 in pPHO1 This study
    pPHO-YscD1–410 SacI- and ApaI-digested PCR fragment encoding YscD residues 1–410 in pPHO1 This study

Growth experiments designed to compare the effects of inducing the dominant-negative FLAG-YscD354-419 early (before and during T3S apparatus assembly) versus late (following T3S apparatus assembly) used a modified growth and secretion assay. Separate overnight cultures (with and without 0.05 mM IPTG) were grown for each strain. The next day, strains were subcultured (with and without 0.05 mM IPTG as grown overnight), grown 1 h at 27°C, and shifted to 37°C for 3 h, at which point all cultures were harvested by centrifugation for 3 min at 8,000 × g at room temperature (RT). The 3-h supernatant from each culture was collected (SUP-1), and pellets were resuspended with prewarmed TMH media containing the appropriate antibiotics and 0.05 mM IPTG (added to all cultures except control [CTL] cultures). Growth of cultures at 37°C was continued for the next 4 h, and bacterial whole cells and supernatants (SUP-2) were separated by centrifugation, collected, and subjected to sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and immunoblot analysis.

Construction of expression vectors encoding full-length FLAG-YscD as well as N-terminal- and C-terminal-truncated FLAG-YscD proteins.

DNA fragments used to construct pFLAG-YscDFL, pFLAG-YscD6–419, pFLAG13–419, pFLAG-YscD47–419, pFLAG-YscD76–419, pFLAG-YscD119–419, pFLAG-YscD143–419, pFLAG-YscD157–419, pFLAG-YscD217–419, pFLAG-YscD283-419, and pFLAG-YscD354-419 were amplified from plasmid pCD1 by the use of the downstream oligonucleotide primer YscD419-BglII-2 with each corresponding upstream primer: YscD-HindIII-1, YscD6-HindIII-1, YscD13-HindIII-1, YscD47-HindIII-1, YscD76-HindIII-1, YscD119-HindIII-1, YscD143-HindIII-1, YscD157-HindIII-1, YscD217-HindIII-1, YscD283-HindIII-1, and YscD354-HindIII-1 (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). The resultant DNA fragments were digested with HindIII and BglII and inserted into HindIII- and BglII-digested pFLAG-MAC (Sigma-Aldrich). Additionally, DNA fragments encoding YscD157-419, YscD217-419, YscD283-419, and YscD354-419 were inserted into HindIII- and BglII-digested pFLAG-ATS (Sigma-Aldrich), which encodes the OmpA secretion signal (ss) and a FLAG epitope tag, resulting in pssFLAG-YscD157-419, pssFLAG-YscD217-419, pssFLAG-YscD283-419, and pssFLAG-YscD354-419. The DNA fragment inserted in plasmid pssFLAG-YscD283-353 (PD3) was amplified from plasmid pCD1 with primers YscD283-HindIII-1 and YscD353-BglII-2. The resultant DNA fragment was digested with HindIII and BglII and inserted into HindIII- and BglII-digested pFLAG-ATS.

Expression vectors pFLAG-YscD1-353, pFLAG-YscD1-282, pFLAG-YscD1-216, and pFLAG-YscD1-156 were constructed using DNA fragments amplified from plasmid pCD1 by the use of upstream oligonucleotide primer YscD-HindIII-1 with downstream oligonucleotide primers YscD353-BglII-2, YscD282-BglII-2, YscD216-BglII-2, and YscD1-156-BglII-2, respectively. The resultant DNA fragments were digested with HindIII and BglII and inserted into HindIII- and BglII-digested pFLAG-MAC.

Construction of pFLAG-YscD expression vectors with in-frame deletions.

In-frame deletions in yscD of pFLAG-YscDFL were generated by either whole-plasmid PCR (17) or PCR-ligation-PCR (3) techniques. In certain instances, an EagI or KpnI site was created at the joint to facilitate the screening process. The pFLAG-YscDΔ24–72 (ΔFHA), pFLAG-YscDΔ224–277 (ΔBON/ΔPD2), pFLAG-YscDΔ88–113 (Δ region between the FHA domain and the transmembrane [TM]), pFLAG-YscDΔ290–315, and pFLAG-YscDΔ316–351 constructs were created by whole-plasmid PCR with the following primer sets: for pFLAG-YscDΔ24–72, primers YscD23-rev and YscD73-for; for pFLAG-YscDΔ224–277, primers YscD223-rev and YscD278-for; for pFLAG-YscDΔ88–113, primers YscD87-rev and YscD114-for; for pFLAG-YscDΔ290–315, primers YscD289-rev and YscD316-for; and for pFLAG-YscDΔ316–351, primers YscD315-rev and YscD352-for. Amplification products were treated with DpnI to digest template DNA, ligated, and electroporated into E. coli DH5α.

The pFLAG-YscDΔ163–208 (ΔPD1) and pFLAG-YscDΔ290–351 (ΔPD3) constructs were created using the PCR-ligation-PCR technique (3). Initially, PCR fragments upstream and downstream of each deletion were amplified using the following sets of primer pairs: for pFLAG-YscDΔ163–208, primer pair YscD162-rev and YscD-HindIII-1 and primer pair YscD209-for and YscD419-BglII-2; and for pFLAG-YscDΔ290–351, primer pair YscD289-rev and YscD-HindIII-1 and primer pair YscD352-for and YscD419-BglII-2. The resultant pair of DNA fragments for each deletion was ligated and reamplified with outside primers YscD-HindIII-1 and YscD419-BglII-2. The final DNA products were digested with HindIII and BglII and inserted into HindIII- and BglII-digested pFLAG-MAC.

Construction of FLAG-YscD-TM24 and FLAG-YscD-TM28.

Plasmids pFLAG-YscD-TM24 and pFLAG-YscD-TM28 encode FLAG-YscD hybrid proteins with TM residues 121 to 142 or 121 to 148 of YscD replaced with sequences encoding the TM domain of PspC of Y. enterocolitica (NH2-RVMVVLSLFFGLFVFTIAAYIVLT-COOH) or the TM domain of Y. pestis (NH2-RVIMVLSLFFGLFVFTVAAYIILAFMLE-C), respectively. These constructs were generated by multiple PCR-ligation-PCR steps. Oligonucleotides Yent-TM-1 and Yent-TM-2 were used to amplify the PspC TM domain of Y. enterocolitica from pAJD572 (30), while oligonucleotide primers Yp-TM-1 and Yp-TM-2 were used to amplify sequences encoding the PspC TM domain from Y. pestis KIM chromosomal DNA. The PCR fragment encoding YscD residues 143 to 419 was amplified with primers YscD-Yent-TM-for and YscD419-BglII-2 and ligated with the Y. enterocolitica pspC PCR fragment, whereas the YscD fragment encoding residues 149 to 419 was amplified with primers YscD-Yp-TM-for and YscD419-BglII-2 and ligated to the Y. pestis pspC PCR fragment. Finally, sequences encoding YscD residues 1 to 120 of YscD were amplified with primers YscD-HindIII-1 and YscD-TM-rev. The resultant product was ligated to the amplified DNA fragments encoding the Y. enterocolitica or Y. pestis PspC C-terminal TM YscD residues and reamplified with primers YscD-HindIII-1 and YscD419-BglII-2. The resulting fragments encoding full-length YscD, with the TM-encoding sequences replaced with those of pspC, were digested with HindIII and BglII and inserted into HindIII- and BglII-digested pFLAG-MAC, generating plasmids pFLAG-YscD-TM24 (Y. enterocolitica PspC TM residues) and pFLAG-YscD-TM28 (Y. pestis PspC TM residues).

Construction of yscD::phoA-lacZα fusions.

A dual alkaline phosphatase (PhoA) β-galactosidase (β-Gal) (LacZα) reporter system developed by Alexeyev and Winkler (1, 2) was utilized to determine the membrane topology of YscD. DNA fragments that encode residues 1 to 29, 1 to 54, 1 to 63, 1 to 83, 1 to 110, 1 to 121, 1 to 162, 1 to 180, 1 to 256, 1 to 310, and 1 to 410 of YscD were amplified by PCR using oligonucleotide YscD-SacI-1 with YscD29-ApaI-2, YscD54-ApaI-2, YscD63-ApaI-2, YscD83-ApaI-2, YscD110-ApaI-2, YscD121-ApaI-2, YscD162-ApaI-2, YscD180-ApaI-2, YscD256-ApaI-2, YscD310-ApaI-2, and YscD410-ApaI-2, respectively. The resultant DNA fragments were digested with SacI and ApaI and inserted in frame with the phoA-lacZα reporter gene of SacI- and ApaI-digested plasmid pPHO1 (38). The resulting pPHO1-YscD constructs were electroporated into E. coli DH5α and assayed for alkaline phosphatase and β-galactosidase activity as described below.

β-Galactosidase and alkaline phosphatase assays of E. coli DH5α carrying yscD::phoA-lacZα fusions.

E. coli DH5α strains harboring different pPHO1 yscD::phoA-lacZα fusion constructs were grown overnight in HIB at 37°C and used to inoculate fresh cultures at an optical density at 620 nm (OD620) of 0.2 the next day. After 1 h of growth at 37°C, expression of the YscD::PhoA-LacZα hybrid proteins was induced with 0.1 mM IPTG and growth continued for another 2 h. Bacterial cells (100 μl) were added to 500 μl of β-Gal assay buffer (100 mM sodium phosphate buffer [pH 7], 10 mM KCl, 1 mM MgSO4) or AP assay buffer (1 M Tris-HCl [pH 8]) and permeabilized by addition of 25 μl of 0.1% SDS, β-mercaptoethanol (β-ME) (50 mM final concentration), and 25 μl of CHCl3. The assays were initiated by addition of 200 μl of substrate (4 mg/ml ONPG [o-nitrophenyl-β-d-galactopyranoside] for β-galactosidase assays or 1 mg/ml pNPP [p-nitrophenyl phosphate] for alkaline phosphatase assays). Reactions were stopped by addition of 500 μl of 1 M Na2CO3, and assay times and OD420 readings were recorded and used to calculate units of activity as described previously (38).

Coimmunoprecipitation of YscJ and YscC with YscD.

Y. pestis cultures (25 ml TMH, 2.5 mM CaCl2, 0.05 mM IPTG) were grown for 1 h at 27°C and for 4 h at 37°C. Bacterial cells were harvested by centrifugation (8,000 × g for 10 min at 4°C) and resuspended in 2 to 3 ml of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (pH 7.4) in accordance with the OD620 of each culture at harvest. Protein complexes were stabilized by chemical cross-linking with 0.5 mM dithiobis(succinimidyl) propionate (DSP) (Thermo Scientific) for 20 min at RT. Bacterial cells were lysed by passage through a French pressure cell at 20,000 lb/in2. Following bacterial lysis, additional DSP (1 mM total DSP final concentration) was added and the lysate was incubated at RT for 20 min. Cross-linking was terminated by the addition of 100 μl of 1 M Tris-HCl (pH 7.4) for 10 min at RT. Inner and outer membrane proteins were solubilized with Zwittergent 3-14 (Calbiochem). Briefly, 2 ml of bacterial lysate was combined with 0.5 ml of 10% Zwittergent 3-14–PBS (pH 7.4) (2% final concentration) and incubated at RT for 10 min. Insoluble material was removed by centrifugation at 128,000 × g for 30 min at 8°C. To facilitate antibody binding, 1.5 ml of detergent-soluble supernatant was combined with 13.5 ml of PBS (pH 7.4) (0.2% Zwittergent 3-14 final concentration). Anti-FLAG M2 affinity gel (Sigma-Aldrich) (100 μl) was added to each diluted sample, and samples were incubated at 4°C with rotation overnight. The anti-FLAG M2 affinity beads were pelleted by centrifugation at 1,000 × g for 5 min at 8°C, washed twice with 8 ml PBS–0.2% Zwittergent 3-14 (pH 7.4), and eluted with the same buffer containing 200 μg/ml FLAG peptide (Sigma-Aldrich). Zwittergent 3-14 lysates and anti-FLAG M2 elutions were subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblot analysis with the FLAG M2 antibody (Sigma-Aldrich) and antisera specific for YscJ and YscC.

SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting.

Cultures of bacteria were harvested by centrifugation at 14,000 × g for 10 min at RT. Pellets of whole-cell bacteria and trichloroacetic acid (TCA)-precipitated supernatant proteins were resuspended according to the harvest OD620 and subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting as previously described (18). YscC, YscJ, YopM, and YopN were detected with rabbit polyclonal antisera (1:20,000) raised against the full-length Ysc or Yop proteins. FLAG-tagged proteins were detected with anti-FLAG M2 monoclonal antibodies (1:1,000) or rabbit anti-FLAG polyclonal antibodies (1:1,000).

RESULTS

The Y. pestis YscD protein is a 419-residue inner membrane protein that is essential for the T3S process (35). It is a member of the EscD-PrgH-YscD family of T3S components, whose members are present in all T3SSs (16). The best-studied member of this family is PrgH, a major component of the Salmonella enterica SPI-1 T3SS needle complex (22, 39). PrgH and PrgK (a YscJ homolog) are predicted to multimerize and form the inner membrane ring-like structures of the SPI-1 T3S apparatus. PrgH possesses a small cytoplasmic domain, a single TM domain, and a large periplasmic domain. The structure of a portion of the periplasmic domain of PrgH has been determined (see Fig. 1B) and shown to contain a conserved domain, termed a “ring-building motif,” that is also present in the predicted periplasmic regions of EscC (a YscC homolog) and EscJ (a YscJ homolog) (39, 44). Although significant structural information is available for PrgH, no detailed mutational or deletion studies have been completed on an EscD-PrgH-YscD family protein.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Comparison of the YscD and PrgH periplasmic regions. (A) Amino acid sequence alignment of the periplasmic regions of YscD (residues 155 to 419) and PrgH (residues 170 to 362). Regions corresponding to individual domains of PrgH are labeled as periplasmic domains PD1 to PD4. Identical residues are marked by an asterisk (*), strongly similar residues are marked by a colon (:), and weakly similar residues are marked by a period (.). (B) Ribbon representation of the PrgH170–362 crystal structure (39) generated using Pymol (http://www.pymol.org).

Membrane topology of Y. pestis YscD.

Defining the membrane topology of YscD is crucial for understanding the role of this protein in the T3S process. Previous analyses of EscD-PrgH-YscD family proteins suggest that members of this family have a single TM domain. Interestingly, the transmembrane prediction programs TopPred (42), DAS (8), and TMpred (15) all predict that YscD would possess two N-terminal TM domains (residues 80 to 97 and 122 to 142). To accurately determine the membrane topology of YscD, a dual phoA-lacZα gene fusion reporter system (2) was utilized to generate a set of 11 in-frame yscD::phoA-lacZα gene fusion constructs. These constructs, which encode increasing N-terminal regions of YscD fused in-frame to E. coli alkaline phosphatase (without its secretion signal) and the LacZα peptide, were electroporated into E. coli DH5α and analyzed for both alkaline phosphatase and β-galactosidase (α complementation) activities (Fig. 2). Alkaline phosphatase is active when fused to a region of YscD that is localized on the periplasmic side of the inner membrane; in contrast, high β-galactosidase activity is obtained when the LacZ α peptide is fused to a portion of YscD that is localized in the cytoplasm. Strains expressing YscD::phoA-lacZα fusions containing the 121 N-terminal YscD residues or fewer (29, 54, 63, 83, or 110) YscD residues all expressed high β-galactosidase activity and low alkaline phosphatase activities, indicating a cytoplasmic location. These strains included fusions located prior to, within, and immediately following the first predicted transmembrane domain (residues 80 to 97), demonstrating that this region of YscD does not function as a TM domain. Finally, strains expressing YscD::PhoA-LacZα fusions containing the N-terminal 162 YscD residues or more (180, 256, 310, or 410) YscD residues all expressed relatively high alkaline phosphatase activities and low β-galactosidase activities, indicating a periplasmic location. These results strongly indicate that YscD contains a single TM domain (residues 122 to 142) that connects a small N-terminal cytoplasmic region (residues 1 to 121) to a large periplasmic region (residues 143 to 419). This membrane topology is similar to that predicted for PrgH and HrcD, two other EscD-PrgH-YscD family members (4, 37).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Determination of YscD membrane topology. (A) Alkaline phosphatase (AP) activities (measured in AP units [U]) of E. coli DH5α strains expressing YscD::PhoA-LacZα fusion proteins fused after YscD residue 29, 54, 63, 83, 110, 121, 162, 180, 256, 310, or 410. (B) β-Galactosidase (BG) activities (measured in Miller units [U]) of the same E. coli DH5α strains expressing YscD::PhoA-LacZα fusion proteins. (C) Model of YscD membrane topology. YscD residues 1 to 121 are located in the bacterial cytoplasm, residues 122 to 142 form a transmembrane (TM) domain, and residues 143 to 419 are located in the bacterial periplasm. Values represent the means of activity determinations assayed in duplicate experiments. Error bars represent standard deviations (SD).

The N terminus of YscD is essential for the T3S process.

The role of the N-terminal cytoplasmic region of YscD in the T3S process was investigated by constructing a series of deletions in yscD of pFLAG-YscD, which encodes an N-terminal FLAG-tagged YscD protein. The truncations constructed removed yscD sequences encoding residues prior to, within, and beyond the previously identified FHA domain (residues 24 to 72) (33) and continued through the YscD TM domain (residues 122 to 142). The derivatives of pFLAG-YscD carrying the deletions were moved into the yscD deletion strain (35), and the expression of FLAG-tagged YscD proteins, as well as the expression and secretion of YopM and YopN, was subjected to analysis of growth of the bacteria in the presence and absence of calcium (2.5 mM [blocks Yop secretion]) and by evaluation of culture supernatant and whole-cell proteins by SDS-PAGE and immunoblot analysis (Fig. 3A). The full-length FLAG-tagged YscD protein (FLAG-YscDFL) restored calcium-regulated secretion of both YopN and YopM. A truncated FLAG-tagged YscD protein (FLAG-YscD6–419) lacking the N-terminal 5 amino acids showed reduced secretion of YopM and YopN, whereas removal of the N-terminal 12, 46, 75, 118, or 142 amino acids completely abolished Yop secretion. These data demonstrate the importance of the N-terminal cytoplasmic domain of YscD in the assembly of a functional T3S apparatus. Removal of even small regions of YscD prior to the FHA domain disrupted the T3S process, indicating that N-terminal regions outside the FHA domain are critical for YscD function or for the proper folding of the cytoplasmic region of YscD.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Analysis of YopM and YopN expression and secretion, as well as expression of N-terminal truncated FLAG-YscD proteins. (A) Y. pestis ΔyscD deletion strain carrying pFLAG-YscD plasmids. (B) Wild-type Y. pestis KIM5-3001 carrying pFLAG-YscD plasmids. Strains were grown in the presence (+) or absence (−) of 2.5 mM CaCl2 for 5 h at 37°C and harvested by centrifugation to separate whole-cell (WC) and supernatant (SUP) fractions. Samples were subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblot analysis. Black arrowheads indicate the various N-terminal truncated FLAG-YscD proteins.

N-terminally truncated YscD proteins display a dominant-negative phenotype when expressed in a wild-type background.

YscD is one component of a multiprotein T3S complex and likely mediates functional interactions with other components of this complex (28). Dominant-negative mutants are useful tools for defining the function, interactions, and interaction domains of a protein. Therefore, we assessed whether expression of the N-terminally truncated FLAG-YscD proteins could impair Yop secretion in a wild-type background (dominant-negative phenotype). Expression of each of the nonfunctional N-terminally truncated YscD proteins, except for FLAG-YscD143–419, in the wild-type parent strain severely impaired the secretion of YopN and YopM (Fig. 3B). The FLAG-YscD119–419 protein lacks the entire cytoplasmic domain, suggesting that the dominant-negative phenotype associated with this mutant is mediated by the TM domain or the periplasmic region of this protein. Similarly, the lack of a dominant-negative effect of FLAG-YscD143–419 is due either to removal of the TM domain or to mislocalization of the periplasmic YscD domain to the cytosol in the absence of the TM domain. Overall, these results demonstrate that YscD mutants with a deletion of 5 or more N-terminal residues are defective for T3S and exhibit a dominant-negative effect on the T3S process when expressed in the parent strain.

C-terminal regions of YscD display a dominant-negative phenotype when targeted to the periplasm in the wild-type parent strain.

To determine whether the dominant-negative effect associated with expression of the N-terminally truncated FLAG-YscD proteins was dependent upon proper localization of the YscD C terminus (residues 143 to 419) to the periplasm, vectors encoding the OmpA secretion signal fused to the FLAG epitope tag and various portions of the YscD C-terminal periplasmic region were constructed. Based on amino acid sequence alignment with PrgH (Fig. 1A), the YscD periplasmic region can be divided into four separate regions or domains, here termed periplasmic domains (PD) PD1, PD2, PD3, and PD4. pFLAG vectors expressing the entire periplasmic region (FLAG-YscD143–419), PD1 to -4 (FLAG-YscD157–419), PD2 to -4 (FLAG-YscD217–419), PD3 and -4 (FLAG-YscD283-419), or PD4 (FLAG-YscD354-419), with (pFLAG-ATS) and without (pFLAG-MAC) the OmpA secretion signal (ss), were generated and moved into the yscD deletion strain and the parent strain. As expected, all of the truncated YscD proteins were nonfunctional and failed to restore Yop secretion in the yscD deletion strain (data not shown). Interestingly, the intact as well as truncated YscD periplasmic regions with, but not without, the OmpA secretion signal exhibited at least a partial dominant-negative effect on the T3S process when expressed in the wild-type parent strain (Fig. 4). Periplasmic expression of the isolated PD4 region (ssFLAG-YscD354-419) had an especially potent dominant-negative effect on the secretion of YopM and YopN by the parent strain, suggesting that this region of YscD might compete with full-length YscD for a critical interaction site within the periplasm.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

FLAG-tagged C-terminal regions of YscD expressed in the periplasm of wild-type Y. pestis KIM5-3001 exhibit a dominant-negative effect on the T3S process. C-terminal FLAG-YscD proteins were expressed without (pFLAG-YscD constructs) or with (pssFLAG-YscD constructs) an N-terminal OmpA secretion signal (ss). Strains were grown in the presence (+) or absence (−) of 2.5 mM CaCl2 for 5 h at 37°C and harvested by centrifugation to separate whole-cell (WC) and supernatant (SUP) fractions. Samples were subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblot analysis. Black arrowheads indicate the various FLAG-tagged YscD proteins.

The C terminus of YscD is essential for the T3S process.

To determine whether the various C-terminal regions of YscD (PD1, PD2, PD3, and PD4) are necessary for the T3S process, constructs were generated lacking PD4 (FLAG-YscD1–353), PD3 and -4 (FLAG-YscD1–282), PD2 to -4 (FLAG-YscD1–216), or PD1 to -4 (FLAG-YscD1–156). These constructs were expressed in the yscD deletion strain and analyzed for FLAG-YscD expression as well as for Yop expression and secretion (Fig. 5A). The FLAG-YscD1–216 and FLAG-YscD1–156 proteins were poorly expressed. Removal of the C-terminal 66 amino acids (PD4) from the C terminus of YscD resulted in the complete loss of YopN and YopM secretion, confirming an essential role for this region in the T3S process. Interestingly, expression of the FLAG-YscD1–353 and FLAG-YscD1–282 proteins in the wild-type parent strain had no effect on the secretion of Yops (no dominant-negative effects) (Fig. 5B), further indicating that the C-terminal 66 residues (PD4) of YscD may play a critical role in the dominant-negative phenotype previously observed with the N-terminally truncated FLAG-YscD proteins. To directly address this possibility, sequences encoding the C-terminal 66 residues of YscD (PD4) were deleted from constructs encoding the dominant-negative FLAG-YscD13–419 and ssFLAG-YscD143–419 proteins, generating plasmids pFLAG-YscD13–353 and pssFLAG-YscD143–353. The pFLAG-YscD13–419, pFLAG-YscD13–353, pssFLAG-YscD143–419, and pssFLAG-YscD143–353 constructs were moved into the wild-type parent strain, and the resulting strains were analyzed for Yop expression and secretion (Fig. 6). As suspected, the C-terminal 66 residues of YscD (PD4) were found to be essential for the dominant-negative phenotype associated with expression of the FLAG-YscD13–419 and ssFLAG-YscD143–419 proteins. These results provide additional evidence that the PD4 region of YscD mediates a critical periplasmic interaction and that defective YscD proteins that carry this domain likely compete with full-length YscD for this interaction.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Analysis of YopM and YopN expression and secretion as well as expression of C-terminal truncated FLAG-YscD proteins. (A) Y. pestis ΔyscD deletion strain carrying pFLAG-YscD plasmids. (B) Wild-type Y. pestis KIM5-3001 carrying pFLAG-YscD plasmids. Strains were grown in the presence (+) or absence (−) of 2.5 mM CaCl2 for 5 h at 37°C and harvested by centrifugation to separate whole-cell (WC) and supernatant (SUP) fractions. Samples were subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblot analysis. Black arrowheads indicate the various FLAG-tagged YscD proteins.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

The C-terminal 66 residues of YscD (PD4) are required for the dominant-negative effect of FLAG-YscD13–419 and ssFLAG-YscD143–419 in wild-type Y. pestis KIM5-3001. The FLAG-YscD13–419, FLAG-YscD13–353 (PD4 region deleted), ssFLAG-YscD143–419, and ssFLAG-YscD143–353 (PD4 region deleted) proteins were expressed in wild-type Y. pestis KIM5-3001. Strains were grown in the presence (+) or absence (−) of 2.5 mM CaCl2 for 5 h at 37°C and harvested by centrifugation to separate whole-cell (WC) and supernatant (SUP) fractions. Samples were subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblot analysis. Black arrowheads indicate the various FLAG-tagged YscD proteins.

Expression of ssFLAG-YscD354-419 (PD4) blocks the assembly of a functional T3S apparatus.

The C-terminal 66 residues (PD4) of YscD were essential for YscD function and generated a strong dominant-negative effect on Yop secretion when fused to the OmpA secretion signal and targeted to the periplasm of the parent strain. These results suggest that this region of YscD mediates a critical protein interaction involved in the assembly, regulation, and/or function of the T3S apparatus.

To determine whether the dominant-negative effect of the YscD C-terminal 66 residues (PD4) is mediated through T3S regulatory components (YopN, TyeA, and LcrG) (10, 29) that function to block Yop secretion in the presence of calcium, the dominant-negative C-terminal 66 residues (PD4) of YscD were expressed in a yopN deletion strain that is defective in the regulation and cannot block secretion in the presence or absence of calcium. Expression of the C-terminal 66 residues (PD4) of YscD blocked YopM secretion from both the wild-type parent strain and the yopN deletion strain (Fig. 7A), demonstrating that the dominant-negative phenotype is not mediated through the secretion regulatory system.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7.

The dominant-negative ssFLAG-YscD354-419 (PD4) protein blocks assembly, but not the function, of the T3S apparatus. (A) Expression of the ssFLAG-YscD354-419 (PD4) protein blocks secretion of Yops by both wild-type Y. pestis KIM5-3001 and by a ΔyopN deletion mutant. Strains were grown in the presence (+) or absence (−) of 2.5 mM CaCl2 for 6 h at 37°C and harvested by centrifugation to separate whole-cell (WC) and supernatant (SUP) fractions. Samples were subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblot analysis. (B) Expression of the ssFLAG-YscD354-419 (PD4) protein blocks secretion of Yops when expression is induced prior to T3S apparatus assembly (IPTG present in overnight cultures and during secretion experiment [++]) but not when added after T3S apparatus assembly (3 h after a shift to 37°C [+]). Cultures were grown 1 h at 27°C and then shifted to 37°C for 3 h. At the 3-h time point, all cultures were centrifuged to separate bacterial whole cells (WC) from the supernatant (SUP-1). Pellets were resuspended in prewarmed TMH media with the appropriate antibiotics and 0.05 mM IPTG (except for controls lacking IPTG) and growth continued at 37°C for another 4 h. SUP-2 refers to the supernatant collected at the final harvest. Samples were subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblot analysis.

Dominant-negative mutants that function by blocking T3S apparatus assembly must be expressed prior to completion of the assembly process in order to exert their dominant-negative effect (9); in contrast, dominant-negative mutants that block the function of the assembled apparatus can exert their effects after assembly of the T3S apparatus is complete. Expression of the ssFLAG-YscD354-419 (PD4) protein fragment prior to and during T3S assembly resulted in a complete block of Yop secretion (Fig. 7B [++ IPTG samples]); however, induction of the ssFLAG-YscD354-419 (PD4) after T3S apparatus assembly (3 h after a shift to 37°C [+ IPTG samples]) had no effect on Yop secretion. These results suggest that periplasmic expression of the C-terminal 66 residues of YscD blocks a critical step in the assembly of the T3S apparatus. Although additional steps in the assembly of the T3S apparatus may still occur in the presence of ssFLAG-YscD354-419 (PD4) protein, recent studies by Diepold et al. (12) have demonstrated that no further assembly of the T3S apparatus occurs in the absence of YscD.

The C-terminal region of YscD (residues 354 to 419 [PD4]) mediates the interaction of YscD with YscC.

Several recent studies (12, 36, 37) have demonstrated that EscD-PrgH-YscD family proteins interact with both EscJ-PrgK-YscJ family proteins and the assembled outer membrane secretin family proteins (YscC in the yersiniae). To determine whether YscD residues 354 to 419 (PD4) mediate the interaction of YscD with YscC or YscJ, anti-FLAG M2 coimmunoprecipitation experiments were conducted with the ssFLAG-YscD354-419 (PD4), ssFLAG-YscD283–353 (PD3), and full-length FLAG-YscDFL proteins expressed in the ΔyscD and/or ΔyscC background (Fig. 8A). YscC, which primarily migrates as an SDS-resistant high-molecular-weight complex (19), coimmunoprecipitated with both ssFLAG-YscD354-419 (PD4) and FLAG-YscDFL but not with ssFLAG-YscD283–353 (PD3). In contrast, YscJ coimmunoprecipitated with full-length FLAG-YscDFl but not with ssFLAG-YscD354-419 (PD4) or ssFLAG-YscD283–353 (PD3). These results indicate that the isolated YscD C-terminal region (PD4) interacts with YscC, but not with YscJ, and likely mediates its dominant-negative effect on T3S apparatus assembly through this interaction.

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8.

Coimmunoprecipitation of YscC and YscJ with FLAG-tagged YscD proteins. Zwittergent 3-14-soluble lysates from ΔyscD or ΔyscC Y. pestis expressing the ssFLAG-YscD354-419 (PD4), ssFLAG-YscD283–353 (PD3), or FLAG-YscDFL proteins (A) or the FLAG-YscDΔ163–208 (ΔPD1), FLAG-YscDΔ224–277 (ΔPD2), FLAG-YscDΔ290–351 (ΔPD3), or FLAG-YscDΔ354-419 (ΔPD4) proteins (B) were immunoprecipitated with anti-FLAG M2 affinity gel. The starting lysates (L) and elutions (E) were subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblot analysis with the FLAG M2 antibody and antisera specific for YscC and YscJ.

To further evaluate the role of the individual YscD periplasmic domains in the interaction of YscD with YscC and YscJ, anti-FLAG M2 coimmunoprecipitation studies were carried out with FLAG-YscD proteins specifically deleted for PD1, PD2, PD3, or PD4 (Fig. 8B). Deletion of DNA sequences encoding PD1, PD2, or PD3 had no effect on the interaction of YscD with YscC or YscJ; however, deletion of sequences encoding PD4 eliminated the interaction of YscD with YscC but had little effect on the interaction of YscD with YscJ. Together, these results demonstrate that the C-terminal PD4 region of YscD is both sufficient to interact with YscC (Fig. 8A) and essential for this interaction (Fig. 8B). In contrast, the interaction of YscD with YscJ likely involves multiple domains of YscD, as deletion of each individual periplasmic domain had no significant effect on the YscD-YscJ interaction.

In-frame deletions of YscD cytoplasmic and periplasmic domains and motifs.

Previous bioinformatic analyses of EscD-PrgH-YscD family proteins have provided information on putative structural motifs present in YscD and other members of this family of proteins (33). These include the presence of an FHA motif in the N-terminal cytoplasmic region of YscD (residues 24 to 72) and a BON (phospholipid-binding) domain in the periplasmic region (PD2 [residues 224 to 277]). In addition, structural studies of PrgH have enabled amino acid sequence alignment-based predictions of the domain structure of the relevant YscD periplasmic region (see Fig. 1) (39). To investigate the function of these individual motifs and/or domains in YscD, in-frame deletions in pFLAG-YscDFL were generated that removed sequences encoding the FHA domain (FLAG-YscDΔ24–72), the region between the FHA domain and the TM domain (FLAG-YscDΔ88–113), PD1 (FLAG-YscDΔ163–208), PD2 (BON domain) (FLAG-YscDΔ224–277), or PD3 (pu-tative ring-building motif) (FLAG-YscDΔ290–351). The secretion of Yops by the yscD deletion strains expressing each of these in-frame deletion mutants was subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblot analysis (Fig. 9A). Strains expressing YscD proteins deleted for the FHA domain, PD1, PD4 (see Fig. 5A), and the region between the FHA domain and the TM domain (Δ88–113) were defective for YopM and YopN secretion, indicating that these regions were required for production of a functional YscD protein. Surprisingly, FLAG-YscD proteins lacking the PD2 (BON domain) or PD3 (putative ring-building motif) secreted YopM and YopN at normal levels in the absence of calcium (secretion-permissive conditions); in addition, the strain expressing the ring-building motif mutant (ΔPD3) also secreted YopM and YopN in the presence of calcium, indicating that this mutant had a specific defect in the regulation of Yop secretion. These results indicate that neither the PD2 (BON domain) nor PD3 (ring-building motif) domain plays an essential role in the assembly or the basic secretory function of the T3S apparatus, although the PD3 domain may have a role in the regulation of the secretion process. To verify that the regulatory defect associated with the FLAG-YscDΔ290–351 (ΔPD3) protein was not due to multicopy plasmid-based overexpression, the ΔPD3 and a PD4 deletion were moved into plasmid pCD1 (see the supplemental material). The resultant strains maintained their unique secretion phenotypes (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material), confirming that these phenotypes were not due to multicopy plasmid-based overexpression or to the presence of an N-terminal FLAG tag.

Fig. 9.

Fig. 9.

Analysis of YopM and YopN expression and secretion as well as expression of FLAG-YscD proteins with internal in-frame deletions. (A) Y. pestis ΔyscD strain expressing FLAG-YscDΔ24–72 (ΔFHA), FLAG-YscDΔ88–113 (Δ region between FHA domain and TM domain), FLAG-YscDΔ163–208 (ΔPD1), FLAG-YscDΔ224–277 (ΔPD2/BON), FLAG-YscDΔ290–351 (ΔPD3), or FLAG-YscDΔ354-419 (ΔPD4). (B) Y. pestis ΔyscD strain expressing FLAG-YscDΔ224–351 (ΔPD2-3) and FLAG-YscDΔ163–351 (ΔPD1-3). Strains were grown in the presence (+) or absence (−) of 2.5 mM CaCl2 for 5 h at 37°C and harvested by centrifugation to separate whole-cell (WC) and supernatant (SUP) fractions. Samples were subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblot analysis. Black arrowheads indicate the various FLAG-tagged YscD proteins.

To further assess the role of the periplasmic PD1, PD2, and PD3 domains in the T3S process, we constructed vectors encoding FLAG-YscD proteins deleted for both the PD2 and PD3 domains (FLAG-YscDΔ224–351) or the PD1, PD2, and PD3 domains (FLAG-YscDΔ163–351). Expression of the FLAG-YscDΔ224–351 or FLAG-YscDΔ163–351 proteins in the yscD deletion mutant failed to restore Yop secretion (Fig. 9B), indicating that FLAG-YscD mutants deleted for PD2 and PD3 or for PD1, PD2, and PD3 were nonfunctional. Interestingly, expression of the FLAG-YscDΔ224–351 protein or the FLAG-YscDΔ163–351 protein in the parent strain still produced a dominant-negative phenotype (data not shown), indicating that the mutant YscD proteins were properly inserted with the PD4 domain localized to the periplasm.

The defect in the calcium-dependent regulation of Yop secretion associated with the FLAG-YscDΔ290–351 (ΔPD3)-encoding construct was unexpected and represents the second example of a mutation in a periplasmic-localized T3S component that alters the regulation of the T3S process (36). This phenotype suggests either that YscD has a direct role in the regulation of Yop secretion or that the mutant FLAG-YscDΔ290–351 protein is disrupting the function of another regulatory component, possibly YscJ or (indirectly) the needle-and-rod structure that also traverses this region.

Previous studies have demonstrated that expression of some regulatory mutants (constitutively secreting YscF needle mutants) can be suppressed by increasing the amount of extracellular calcium whereas that of other regulatory mutants (constitutively secreting yopN or tyeA mutants) cannot (40). The ability of the FLAG-YscDΔ290–351 (ΔPD3) regulatory mutant to respond to calcium was examined by measuring the expression and secretion of YopM in the presence of 0 mM, 1.25 mM, 2.5 mM, 5 mM, and 7.5 mM extracellular calcium (Fig. 10A). Growth of the FLAG-YscDΔ290–351 (ΔPD3) mutant in either 5 mM or 7.5 mM calcium blocked Yop secretion in a manner similar to that previously reported for a YscF D28A point mutant (40), suggesting that the FLAG-YscDΔ290–351 (ΔPD3) protein could mediate its effect on regulation by disrupting the regulatory function of the needle-and-rod component.

Fig. 10.

Fig. 10.

Characterization of the regulation defect associated with expression of FLAG-YscDΔ290–351 (ΔPD3). (A) Expression and secretion of YopM by Y. pestis KIM5-3001.P39 (parent strain), the ΔyopN strain, the YscF(D28A) strain, and the ΔyscD strain expressing FLAG-YscDFL or FLAG-YscDΔ290–351 (ΔPD3) grown for 5 h at 37°C in the presence of 0 mM, 1.25 mM, 2.5 mM, 5 mM, or 7.5 mM CaCl2. Cultures were harvested by centrifugation to separate whole-cell (WC) and supernatant (SUP) fractions. Samples were subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblot analysis. (B) Analysis of YopM and YopN expression and secretion as well as expression of the FLAG-YscDΔ298–315 and the FLAG-YscDΔ316–351 proteins carrying internal in-frame deletions within the PD3 domain. Strains were grown in the presence (+) or absence (−) of 2.5 mM CaCl2 for 5 h at 37°C and harvested by centrifugation to separate whole-cell (WC) and supernatant (SUP) fractions. Samples were subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblot analysis. Black arrowheads indicate the various FLAG-tagged YscD proteins.

Examination of the available PrgH structure revealed that the PD3 domain is primarily comprised of two antiparallel alpha helices separated by a beta sheet (39). To further characterize the role of the PD3 domain in the regulation of Yop secretion, two additional in-frame deletions were generated that together deleted the same region as was deleted in the ΔPD3 mutant but with that deleted region taking the form of two smaller deletions. FLAG-YscDΔ290–315 and FLAG-YscDΔ316–351 were constructed in pFLAG-YscDFL and moved into the yscD deletion strain, and their secretion phenotypes were characterized (Fig. 10B). Strains expressing either of the small internal PD3 deletion mutants secreted YopM and YopN in a normal calcium-regulated manner. These results suggest that the PD3 domain likely does not have a direct functional role in the calcium-dependent regulation of Yop secretion; instead, the regulatory defect associated with the original FLAG-YscDΔ290–351 (ΔPD3) is likely due to an indirect effect of this mutant protein on other regulatory components, possibly YscI or YscF.

Role of the YscD TM domain in the T3S process.

To determine whether the TM domain of YscD has an active (sequence-specific) role in the secretion process, such as a role in TM signaling, protein interactions, or a contribution to the formation of a secretion channel, the TM domain was replaced with TM domains from a protein with a similar topology but a dissimilar TM amino acid sequence. The DNA sequence encoding the TM domain of FLAG-YscD was replaced with that of the phage shock protein C (PspC) (30) TM domain of Y. enterocolitica or Y. pestis, generating constructs encoding the different chimeric proteins (pFLAG-YscD-TM24 and pFLAG-YscD-TM28). Interestingly, replacing the TM domain of YscD with a TM domain with a dissimilar sequence had no effect on the secretion of Yops (Fig. 11), suggesting that the YscD TM domain has no distinct sequence-specific role in the secretion process but rather likely functions as an anchor, tether, or linker for the soluble cytoplasmic and periplasmic regions of YscD.

Fig. 11.

Fig. 11.

Analysis of YopM and YopN expression and secretion as well as expression of the FLAG-YscD-TM24 and FLAG-YscD-TM28 YscD/PspC TM hybrid proteins. pFLAG-YscD-TM24 and pFLAG-YscD-TM28 encode FLAG-YscD protein with YscD TM residues replaced with TM residues found in the Y. enterocolitica and Y. pestis PspC proteins, respectively. Y. pestis ΔyscD deletion strains carrying pFLAG-YscDFL, pFLAG-YscD-TM24, or pFLAG-YscD-TM28 were grown in the presence (+) or absence (−) of 2.5 mM CaCl2 for 5 h at 37°C and harvested by centrifugation to separate whole-cell (WC) and supernatant (SUP) fractions. Samples were subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblot analysis. Black arrowheads indicate the various FLAG-tagged YscD proteins.

DISCUSSION

EscD-PrgH-YscD family proteins are conserved T3S components that multimerize to form inner membrane ring-shaped structures critical for the assembly and function of T3S complexes (27, 39). The Y. pestis YscD protein is a 419-amino-acid inner membrane EscD-PrgH-YscD family protein that is essential for the assembly of a functional plasmid pCD1-encoded T3S apparatus (35). Reporter-based membrane topology studies demonstrated that YscD has a small N-terminal cytoplasmic region (residues 1 to 121), a single TM domain (residues 122 to 142), and a large periplasmic region (residues 143 to 419). Deletion analysis of YscD demonstrated that both the N-terminal cytoplasmic and C-terminal periplasmic regions of YscD are essential for the production of a functional YscD protein. Removal of the coding sequence for as few as 12 N-terminal amino acids, the central FHA domain, or the region between the FHA domain and the TM domain completely blocked all T3S activity. The function of the cytoplasmic region of EscD-PrgH-YscD family proteins is unknown; however, several recent studies suggested that this region may interact with T3S components (EscQ-Spa33-YscQ family proteins) that are implicated in the assembly of a cytoplasmic ring structure (20, 31). Indeed, evidence obtained using a LexA-based bacterial one-hybrid system (13) indicated that the isolated cytoplasmic region of YscD (residues 1 to 121) may dimerize or further multimerize (data not shown) and could form an oligomeric structure that might serve as a scaffold for the assembly of other cytoplasmic T3S components.

Interestingly, bioinformatic analysis of EscD-PrgH-YscD family proteins (33) and structural information available for PrgH (39) provided intriguing functional leads with respect to the predicted PD2 and PD3 domains of YscD. PD2 was predicted to contain a phospholipid-binding (BON) domain (residues 224 to 277), whereas the PD3 domain was suggested to represent a common “ring-building motif” involved in the multimerization and assembly of EscC-InvG-YscC, EscJ-PrgK-YscJ, and EscD-PrgH-YscD family proteins (39, 44). Surprisingly, deletion of sequences encoding almost the entire PD2 or PD3 domain had essentially no effect on the ability of the Ysc T3S apparatus to assemble and export Yop substrates. In contrast, deletion of sequences encoding the PD1 or PD4 domain of YscD disrupted the T3S process. These findings demonstrate that the PD2 (BON domain) and PD3 putative “ring-building motif” does not play an essential role in the assembly of a functional T3S apparatus, whereas the periplasmic PD1 and PD4 domains are essential for YscD function and T3S activity.

The C-terminal periplasmic region of YscD (PD4 [residues 354 to 419]) exerted a strong dominant-negative effect on the T3S process when targeted to the periplasm of the wild-type parent strain. Recent studies with PrgH (37), a Salmonella EscD-PrgH-YscJ family protein, have demonstrated that truncation of only four residues from the PrgH C terminus significantly weakened the interaction of the InvG secretin ring structure with the remainder of the needle complex. Furthermore, cross-linking of InvG to the C-terminal region of PrgH suggested that these regions are closely approximated in the assembled Salmonella needle complex (36, 37). In agreement with these studies, we demonstrated that the isolated C-terminal region of YscD (PD4) can independently interact with the outer membrane YscC secretin complex when targeted to the periplasm via the OmpA secretion signal. Furthermore, the interaction between YscD and YscC was eliminated when the PD4 domain was deleted from full-length YscD. Thus, the periplasmic-localized YscD PD4 domain is both sufficient to interact with YscC on its own and essential for the YscD protein to interact with YscC. These findings are also consistent with recent findings by Diepold et al. (12), who used fluorescent hybrid proteins to demonstrate that injectisome assembly initiates with assembly of the outer membrane secretin (YscC) followed by the addition of YscD and then YscJ. Thus, the dominant-negative periplasmic FLAG-YscD353–419 protein would be expected to directly compete with wild-type YscD for binding to the YscC secretin and would likely arrest T3S apparatus assembly at this early stage. Interestingly, none of the YscD deletion mutants that lacked the PD4 domain had a dominant-negative effect on the T3S process, even though these mutants likely contain regions of YscD involved in the interaction with other T3S components such as YscJ and YscQ. These results further support the hypothesis that YscD must interact and/or multimerize via interaction with YscC prior to establishing functional interactions with other T3S components (12).

YscD has also been shown to interact with the other major ring-forming periplasmic constituent, YscJ (12). YscJ is a lipoprotein that is attached to the inner membrane at its N terminus via its lipid moiety and at its C terminus by a single TM domain, terminating with a cytoplasmic anchor sequence (38). Recent studies have demonstrated that the N-terminal cytoplasmic region of PrgH can be cross-linked to the cytosolic C-terminal region of PrgK, a Salmonella EscJ-PrgK-YscJ family protein (37). In addition, other studies have indicated that the periplasmic regions of these proteins also interact (36). Thus, EscD-PrgH-YscD and EscJ-PrgK-YscJ family proteins likely interact at multiple contact sites involving both the periplasmic and cytoplasmic portions of these proteins. Our results are consistent with this interpretation, as YscJ coimmunoprecipitated with full-length FLAG-YscD, as well as with FLAG-YscD proteins deleted for each of the predicted periplasmic domains (Fig. 8), but not with the isolated FLAG-YscD (PD4) or FLAG-YscD (PD3) domains targeted to the periplasmic space.

Surprisingly, sequences encoding the YscD PD2 or PD3 regions could be deleted with essentially no effect on the basic T3S process, indicating that these regions are not essential for the assembly or function of the T3S apparatus. Instead, the essential PD1 and PD4 regions likely mediate the contacts critical for the assembly of a functional T3S apparatus. Alternatively, the PD2 and PD3 domains may serve redundant essential roles in T3S apparatus assembly, as elimination of both domains resulted in a nonfunctional YscD protein.

Although the ΔPD3 YscD mutant secreted normal levels of YopM and YopN under secretion-permissive conditions (37°C [without Ca2+]); this mutant also secreted Yops in the presence of calcium, indicating a defect in the regulation of Yop secretion. This defect could be suppressed by increasing the level of extracellular calcium, in agreement with what has been reported previously for YscF needle mutants defective in the regulation of secretion (40). The conformation of the needle, which is hypothesized to be controlled, in part, by extracellular calcium levels, is further hypothesized to control the activity of the YopN-SycN-YscB-TyeA complex, which controls the export of the Yop effector proteins (10). Importantly, the YscF-YscI needle-and-rod structure passes through the YscJ ring of the YscJ-YscD periplasmic structure; thus, we hypothesize that this mutant has an altered conformation that may affect the conformation of the YscD-YscJ ring structure and impinge on the needle-and-rod structure, altering its conformation and signaling function. These findings provide further evidence that the needle-and-rod-like structure, and/or possibly the YscJ-YscD ring structure itself, plays a role in regulating the T3S process in response to extracellular signals. Multiple smaller deletions in the PD3 domain (FLAG-YscDΔ290–315 and FLAG-YscDΔ316–351) that together removed the same region had no effect on the regulation or function of the T3S process, indicating that the YscD protein likely has no direct role in the regulation of Yop secretion.

Finally, we demonstrate that the YscD TM domain can be functionally replaced with a TM domain with a dissimilar sequence from another protein. Similar results were obtained with the single TM domain of YscJ (38). These studies suggest that these TM domains have no direct sequence-specific role in the T3S process and likely are not involved in signaling, protein interactions, or channel formation. Thus, the TM domain of YscD functions to tether or anchor the critical N-terminal cytoplasmic and periplasmic regions to the bacterial inner membrane. Together, the results of the studies presented demonstrate that the essential functional regions of YscD are the N-terminal cytoplasmic domain and the periplasmic PD1 and PD4 domains. Future studies will be aimed at further characterizing the specific role of these regions in the assembly and function of the Ysc T3S apparatus.

Supplementary Material

[Supplemental material]

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The work was supported by Public Health Service grant AI050552 from the National Institutes of Health.

We thank Andrew Darwin for providing plasmid pAJD572. We thank Kristian Richards, Jose Coba, and Gabriella Raffa for assistance in some of the studies.

Footnotes

Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://jb.asm.org/.

Published ahead of print on 25 February 2011.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Alexeyev M. F., Winkler H. H. 1999. Membrane topology of the Rickettsia prowazekii ATP/ADP translocase revealed by novel dual pho-lac reporters. J. Mol. Biol. 285:1503–1513 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Alexeyev M. F., Winkler H. H. 2002. Transposable dual reporters for studying the structure-function relationships in membrane proteins: permissive sites in R. prowazekii ATP/ADP translocase. Biochemistry 41:406–414 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Ali S. A., Steinkasserer A. 1995. PCR-ligation-PCR mutagenesis: a protocol for creating gene fusions and mutations. Biotechniques 18:746–750 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Berger C., Robin G. P., Bonas U., Koebnik R. 2010. Membrane topology of conserved components of the type III secretion system from the plant pathogen Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria. Microbiology 156:1963–1974 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Burghout P., et al. 2004. Role of the pilot protein YscW in the biogenesis of the YscC secretin in Yersinia enterocolitica. J. Bacteriol. 186:5366–5375 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Cambau E., Bordon F., Collatz E., Gutmann L. 1993. Novel gyrA point mutation in a strain of Escherichia coli resistant to fluoroquinolones but not to nalidixic acid. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 37:1247–1252 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Cornelis G. R. 2002. The Yersinia Ysc-Yop ‘type III’ weaponry. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 3:742–752 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Cserzö M., Wallin E., Simon I., von Heijne G., Elofsson A. 1997. Prediction of transmembrane alpha-helices in prokaryotic membrane proteins: the dense alignment surface method. Protein Eng. 10:673–676 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Davis A. J., Diaz D. A., Mecsas J. 2010. A dominant-negative needle mutant blocks type III secretion of early but not late substrates in Yersinia. Mol. Microbiol. 76:236–259 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Day J. B., Ferracci F., Plano G. V. 2003. Translocation of YopE and YopN into eukaryotic cells by Yersinia pestis yopN, tyeA, sycN, yscB and lcrG deletion mutants measured using a phosphorylatable peptide tag and phosphospecific antibodies. Mol. Microbiol. 47:807–823 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Day J. B., Plano G. V. 2000. The Yersinia pestis YscY protein directly binds YscX, a secreted component of the type III secretion machinery. J. Bacteriol. 182:1834–1843 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Diepold A., et al. 2010. Deciphering the assembly of the Yersinia type III secretion injectisome. EMBO J. 29:1928–1940 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Dmitrova M., et al. 1998. A new LexA-based genetic system for monitoring and analyzing protein heterodimerization in Escherichia coli. Mol. Gen. Genet. 257:205–212 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Hardie K. R., Lory S., Pugsley A. P. 1996. Insertion of an outer membrane protein in Escherichia coli requires a chaperone-like protein. EMBO J. 15:978–988 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Hofmann K. a, S. W. 1993. TMbase—a database of membrane spanning proteins segments. Biol. Chem. Hoppe-Seyler 374:166 [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Hueck C. J. 1998. Type III protein secretion systems in bacterial pathogens of animals and plants. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 62:379–433 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Imai Y., Matsushima Y., Sugimura T., Terada M. 1991. A simple and rapid method for generating a deletion by PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 19:2785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Jackson M. W., Day J. B., Plano G. V. 1998. YscB of Yersinia pestis functions as a specific chaperone for YopN. J. Bacteriol. 180:4912–4921 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Jackson M. W., Plano G. V. 1999. DsbA is required for stable expression of outer membrane protein YscC and for efficient Yop secretion in Yersinia pestis. J. Bacteriol. 181:5126–5130 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Johnson D. L., Stone C. B., Mahony J. B. 2008. Interactions between CdsD, CdsQ, and CdsL, three putative Chlamydophila pneumoniae type III secretion proteins. J. Bacteriol. 190:2972–2980 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Journet L., Hughes K. T., Cornelis G. R. 2005. Type III secretion: a secretory pathway serving both motility and virulence. Mol. Membr. Biol. 22:41–50 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Kimbrough T. G., Miller S. I. 2000. Contribution of Salmonella typhimurium type III secretion components to needle complex formation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97:11008–11013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Koster M., et al. 1997. The outer membrane component, YscC, of the Yop secretion machinery of Yersinia enterocolitica forms a ring-shaped multimeric complex. Mol. Microbiol. 26:789–797 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Kubori T., et al. 1998. Supramolecular structure of the Salmonella typhimurium type III protein secretion system. Science 280:602–605 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Lindler L. E., Klempner M. S., Straley S. C. 1990. Yersinia pestis pH 6 antigen: genetic, biochemical, and virulence characterization of a protein involved in the pathogenesis of bubonic plague. Infect. Immun. 58:2569–2577 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Macnab R. M. 2004. Type III flagellar protein export and flagellar assembly. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1694:207–217 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Marlovits T. C., et al. 2004. Structural insights into the assembly of the type III secretion needle complex. Science 306:1040–1042 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Marlovits T. C., Stebbins C. E. 2010. Type III secretion systems shape up as they ship out. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 13:47–52 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Matson J. S., Nilles M. L. 2001. LcrG-LcrV interaction is required for control of Yops secretion in Yersinia pestis. J. Bacteriol. 183:5082–5091 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Maxson M. E., Darwin A. J. 2006. PspB and PspC of Yersinia enterocolitica are dual function proteins: regulators and effectors of the phage-shock-protein response. Mol. Microbiol. 59:1610–1623 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Morita-Ishihara T., et al. 2006. Shigella Spa33 is an essential C-ring component of type III secretion machinery. J. Biol. Chem. 281:599–607 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Pallen M., Chaudhuri R., Khan A. 2002. Bacterial FHA domains: neglected players in the phospho-threonine signalling game? Trends Microbiol. 10:556–563 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Pallen M. J., Beatson S. A., Bailey C. M. 2005. Bioinformatics analysis of the locus for enterocyte effacement provides novel insights into type-III secretion. BMC Microbiol. 5:9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Plano G. V., Day J. B., Ferracci F. 2001. Type III export: new uses for an old pathway. Mol. Microbiol. 40:284–293 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Plano G. V., Straley S. C. 1995. Mutations in yscC, yscD, and yscG prevent high-level expression and secretion of V antigen and Yops in Yersinia pestis. J. Bacteriol. 177:3843–3854 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Sanowar S., et al. 2011. Interactions of the transmembrane polymeric rings of the Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium type III secretion system. MBio 1:1–8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Schraidt O., et al. 2010. Topology and organization of the Salmonella typhimurium type III secretion needle complex components. PLoS Pathog. 6:e1000824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Silva-Herzog E., Ferracci F., Jackson M. W., Joseph S. S., Plano G. V. 2008. Membrane localization and topology of the Yersinia pestis YscJ lipoprotein. Microbiology 154:593–607 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Spreter T., et al. 2009. A conserved structural motif mediates formation of the periplasmic rings in the type III secretion system. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 16:468–476 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Torruellas J., Jackson M. W., Pennock J. W., Plano G. V. 2005. The Yersinia pestis type III secretion needle plays a role in the regulation of Yop secretion. Mol. Microbiol. 57:1719–1733 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Trosky J. E., Liverman A. D., Orth K. 2008. Yersinia outer proteins: Yops. Cell. Microbiol. 10:557–565 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. von Heijne G. 1992. Membrane protein structure prediction. Hydrophobicity analysis and the positive-inside rule. J. Mol. Biol. 225:487–494 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Yen M. R., et al. 2002. Protein-translocating outer membrane porins of Gram-negative bacteria. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1562:6–31 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Yip C. K., Finlay B. B., Strynadka N. C. 2005. Structural characterization of a type III secretion system filament protein in complex with its chaperone. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 12:75–81 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Yip C. K., et al. 2005. Structural characterization of the molecular platform for type III secretion system assembly. Nature 435:702–707 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

[Supplemental material]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES