Skip to main content
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 2011 Jun;193(11):2890–2891. doi: 10.1128/JB.00330-11

Genome Sequence of Streptomyces griseus Strain XylebKG-1, an Ambrosia Beetle-Associated Actinomycete

Kirk J Grubbs 1,2, Peter H W Biedermann 1,3, Garret Suen 1,4, Sandra M Adams 1,4, Joseph A Moeller 1, Jonathan L Klassen 1, Lynne A Goodwin 5,6, Tanja Woyke 5, A Christine Munk 5,6, David Bruce 5,6, Chris Detter 5,6, Roxanne Tapia 5,6, Cliff S Han 5,6, Cameron R Currie 1,4,*
PMCID: PMC3133108  PMID: 21460079

Abstract

Streptomyces griseus strain XylebKG-1 is an insect-associated strain of the well-studied actinobacterial species S. griseus. Here, we present the genome of XylebKG-1 and discuss its similarity to the genome of S. griseus subsp. griseus NBRC13350. XylebKG-1 was isolated from the fungus-cultivating Xyleborinus saxesenii system. Given its similarity to free-living S. griseus subsp. griseus NBRC13350, comparative genomics will elucidate critical components of bacterial interactions with insects.

TEXT

Streptomyces griseus is a soil bacterium known for its production of secondary metabolites, including streptomycin, the first effective antibiotic for tuberculosis (19). Here, we present the genome sequence of Streptomyces griseus strain XylebKG-1, which, to our knowledge, is the first strain of S. griseus associated with an insect. XylebKG-1 was isolated from the ambrosia beetle Xyleborinus saxeseni, which cultivates a fungus for food (2). Actinobacteria-specific isolations from both beetles and their fungal galleries resulted in isolation of XylebKG-1.

DNA from pure isolates was extracted using a bead-beating protocol (10), and the genome was sequenced at the DOE Joint Genome Institute (JGI). A noncontiguous finished genome of XylebKG-1 was generated using a shotgun approach employing a combination of Illumina (3) and 454 sequencing technologies (15). An Illumina shotgun library (69,927,062 reads totaling ∼5.3 Gbp) and two 454 GS (FLX Titanium) shotgun libraries (688,595 standard reads and 172,566 20-kbp paired-end reads totaling ∼352 Mbp) were sequenced and assembled. The 454 data were assembled using Newbler, version 2.3 (Roche), and Illumina sequencing data were assembled with Velvet, version 0.7.63 (20). All assemblies were integrated using parallel Phrap, version SPS D 4.24 (High Performance Software, LLC). Illumina data were used to correct potential base errors and increase consensus quality using the software program Polisher, developed at the JGI (Alla Lapidus, unpublished). Possible misassembled regions were corrected using gapResolution (Cliff Han, unpublished) or Dupfinisher (11) or by sequencing cloned bridging PCR fragments with subcloning. Gaps between contigs were closed by editing in Consed (68), by PCR, and by Bubble PCR (J.-F. Cheng, unpublished) primer walks. The total size of the genome is 8,727,768 bp, and the final assembly is based on 352.4 Mbp of 454 sequence (38× coverage) and 5.3 Gbp of Illumina sequence (257× coverage).

The overall genome G+C content is 72.1%. Generation (http://compbio.ornl.gov/generation/), Glimmer (5), and Critica (version 1.05) (1) were used to predict a total of 7,265 candidate protein-encoding gene models. RNAmmer (13) annotated six 16S rRNAs and six 23S rRNAs. A tRNAscan-SE (14) search revealed 66 tRNAs corresponding to all 20 standard amino acids. Additional PRIAM (4), KEGG (12), and COG (18) analyses were completed, and the results can be accessed at http://genome.ornl.gov/microbial/streACT1.

Evidence for XylebKG-1 as a strain of S. griseus is based on similarity between the genomes of XylebKG-1 and the type strain S. griseus subsp. griseus NBRC13350 (16). Both have similar genome sizes (8.7 Mbp to 8.5 Mbp) and G+C contents (72.1% to 72.2%), six rRNA operons, and 66 tRNAs. An average nucleotide identity analysis conducted between both genomes using Jspecies (version 1.2.1) (17) revealed a 98.98 ANIb value (91.68% genome alignment) and a 98.95 ANIm value (94.13% genome alignment), indicating a species level degree of similarity (9). Given this similarity, XylebKG-1 represents a unique opportunity to study genetic elements involved in Actinobacteria-insect associations.

Nucleotide sequence accession number.

The genome sequence of Streptomyces griseus strain XylebKG-1 has been deposited in GenBank under accession no. ADFC00000000.

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the DOE Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center (DOE BER Office of Science DE-FC02-07ER64494), supporting G.S., S.M.A., J.A.M., and C.R.C. This work was also funded by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture, under identification number WISO1321, supporting K.J.G. P.H.W.B. was partly supported by a DOC fellowship of the Austrian Academy of Sciences at the Department of Behavioral Ecology, University of Bern. The work conducted by the U.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute is supported by the Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy under contract no. DE-AC02-05CH11231. Additional support was provided by the National Science Foundation (MCB-0702025). Support for J.L.K. comes from an NSERC postdoctoral fellowship.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print on 1 April 2011.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Badger J. H., Olsen G. J. 1999. CRITICA: coding region identification tool invoking comparative analysis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:512–524 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Batra L. R. 1967. Ambrosia fungi: a taxonomic revision, and nutritional studies of some species. Mycologia 59:976–1017 [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Bennett S. 2004. Solexa Ltd. Pharmacogenomics 5:433–438 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Claudel-Renard C., Chevalet C., Faraut T., Kahn D. 2003. Enzyme-specific profiles for genome annotation: PRIAM. Nucleic Acids Res. 31:6633–6639 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Delcher A. L., Bratke K. A., Powers E. C., Salzberg S. L. 2007. Identifying bacterial genes and endosymbiont DNA with Glimmer. Bioinformatics 23:673–679 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Ewing B., Green P. 1998. Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using Phred. II. Error probabilities. Genome Res. 8:186–194 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Ewing B., Hillier L., Wendl M. C., Green P. 1998. Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using Phred. I. Accuracy assessment. Genome Res. 8:175–185 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Gordon D., Abajian C., Green P. 1998. Consed: A graphical tool for sequence finishing. Genome Res. 8:195–202 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Goris J., et al. 2007. DNA-DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 57:81–91 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Graff A., Conrad R. 2005. Impact of flooding on soil bacterial communities associated with poplar (Populus sp.) trees. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 53:401–415 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Han C., Chain P. 2006. Finishing repetitive regions automatically with Dupfinisher, p. 142–147 In Valafar H. (ed.), Proceedings of the 2006 International Conference on Bioinformatics Computational Biology, BIOCOMP'06 CSREA Press, Las Vegas, NV [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Kanehisa M., Goto S., Furumichi M., Tanabe M., Hirakawa M. 2010. KEGG for representation and analysis of molecular networks involving diseases and drugs. Nucleic Acids Res. 38:D355–D360 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Lagesen K., et al. 2007. RNAmmer: consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 35:3100–3108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Lowe T. M., Eddy S. R. 1997. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 25:0955–0964 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Margulies M., et al. 2005. Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors. Nature 437:376–380 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Ohnishi Y., et al. 2008. Genome sequence of the streptomycin-producing microorganism streptomyces griseus IFO 13350. J. Bacteriol. 190:4050–4060 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Richter M., Rosselló-Móra R. 2009. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106:19126–19131 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Tatusov R. L., Galperin M. Y., Natale D. A., Koonin E. V. 2000. The COG database: a tool for genome-scale analysis of protein functions and evolution. Nucleic Acids Res. 28:33–36 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Waksman S. A. 1953. Streptomycin: background, isolation, properties, and utilization. Science 118:259–266 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Zerbino D. R., Birney E. 2008. Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res. 18:821–829 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES