Table 3.
Author | Study | Trocar type | Difference in Defect Surface Area | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
Tarnay10 | Randomized, observer blinded swine abdominal wall | Cutting Conical Pyramidal | Conical fascial defect 57–68% smaller than cutting | Conical split muscles, which later re-opposed with fascia |
Conical fascial defect 32–62% smaller than pyramidal | ||||
Bhoyrul11 | 12 swine abdominal, not blinded | Cutting Blunt radially dilating | Radially dilating 52% narrower muscle defect than cutting | Muscles split rather than cut |